Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 154 views

    Aimcat 1801 Expert Review PDF

    Uploaded by

    Mansi Nigam
    The VARC section of the AIMCAT 1801 exam was difficult, testing students' nerves. Both the verbal and reading comprehension areas had high difficulty. Some questions were of medium difficulty but most were difficult or very difficult. The data interpretation and logical reasoning section had mostly manageable, easy to medium difficulty questions allowing students to boost their scores. A few questions were more difficult. The quantitative ability section was of moderate difficulty overall. Many questions required only basic math skills and were achievable. A net score of over 30 was possible.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Aimcat 1801 Expert Review PDF

    Uploaded by

    Mansi Nigam
    154 views2 pages
    The VARC section of the AIMCAT 1801 exam was difficult, testing students' nerves. Both the verbal and reading comprehension areas had high difficulty. Some questions were of medium difficulty but most were difficult or very difficult. The data interpretation and logical reasoning section had mostly manageable, easy to medium difficulty questions allowing students to boost their scores. A few questions were more difficult. The quantitative ability section was of moderate difficulty overall. Many questions required only basic math skills and were achievable. A net score of over 30 was possible.

    Original Title

    AIMCAT 1801 EXPERT REVIEW.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The VARC section of the AIMCAT 1801 exam was difficult, testing students' nerves. Both the verbal and reading comprehension areas had high difficulty. Some questions were of medium difficulty but most were difficult or very difficult. The data interpretation and logical reasoning section had mostly manageable, easy to medium difficulty questions allowing students to boost their scores. A few questions were more difficult. The quantitative ability section was of moderate difficulty overall. Many questions required only basic math skills and were achievable. A net score of over 30 was possible.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    154 views2 pages

    Aimcat 1801 Expert Review PDF

    Uploaded by

    Mansi Nigam
    The VARC section of the AIMCAT 1801 exam was difficult, testing students' nerves. Both the verbal and reading comprehension areas had high difficulty. Some questions were of medium difficulty but most were difficult or very difficult. The data interpretation and logical reasoning section had mostly manageable, easy to medium difficulty questions allowing students to boost their scores. A few questions were more difficult. The quantitative ability section was of moderate difficulty overall. Many questions required only basic math skills and were achievable. A net score of over 30 was possible.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    AIMCAT 1801

    AIMCAT 1801 Analysis

    VARC
    The VARC section of AIMCAT1801 would definitely have tested the nerves of
    many a student to a good extent. With both the areas viz., VA & RC on the
    higher side of difficulty, the test takers should have handled this section with
    extra caution. Natural to assume that the number of attempts would also have
    gone down for many of the students. However, at the same time if somebody
    could keep calm, remain focussed and had concentrated on the accuracy
    levels, then this would have paid rich dividends in this section. 

    

    Talking about the RC area, there were three passages with six questions each
    and two with three questions each, adding up to 24 questions. The number of
    words were in the range 380 to 700. The passages were from varied topics
    viz., Architecture - Historical perspective, Economics, Linguistic Philosophy,
    Psychology, World Economics. Somebody who has a good amount of exposure
    in terms of varied readings,, would have found the RC area as an interesting
    one.

    

    The Verbal ability part of the paper had 10 questions with the distribution as -
    Para Jumbles (3 questions - odd one out), Para Jumbles (3 questions - 5
    sentences), Upstream-downstream (1 question), Summary based (2
    questions), Fill in the blank (1 question). 

    

    In terms of difficulty, question number 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15, 16, 24, 25,
    28, 31 were of medium difficulty level with the rest under difficult or very
    difficult category. 

    


    PERCENTIL
    MARKS
    E
    99 68
    95 55
    90 48
    85 43

    Section II - DATA INTERPRETATION & LOGICAL ABILITY


    The DILR section had a few good things to offer this time around. With almost
    every question a manageable one, one should have definitely done well in this
    particular section. With the average difficulty level ranging from easy to
    medium, the studetns should have used this section as an overall score
    booster as well. The questions were based on Arrangements, Distribution,
    Binary Logic, Flow Chart, Bar Graph, Pie Charts. 

    

    The only questions that fell under the difficult category were 29, 30, 31, 32. 


    Page 1
    AIMCAT 1801

    PERCENTIL
    MARKS
    E
    99 58
    95 46
    90 40
    85 36

    QUANTITATIVE ABILITY
    QA section of this AIMCAT was Moderate in difficulty. 

    

    A net score of more than 30 marks (out of 102 marks) was very much
    achievable in this test. For answering many of the qs, just a basic knowledge of
    Maths was required. There was no question which would be classified as very
    difficult. There were a couple of qs which were slightly difficult but with proper
    strategy, one could have attempted those questions as well. 

    

    Q-1 was a direct question involving the concepts of Averages, Mixtures and
    Alligations. Q-2 involved a direct concept on Percentages, profit, Loss.
    However, one had to be careful as there were two possibilities (Profit or Loss %
    but out of which one could be eliminated). Q-3 (on Arithmetic progressions
    involving inclusion of P terms) was tricky, though doable if the right concept
    was applied in the first place. Some of the questions which were very much
    doable were Q-5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26(by
    elimination of options), 29(by elimination of options), 32, 33 and 34. 

    

    All in all, the whole idea, yet again, is the right selection of questions. 

    


    PERCENTIL MARK
    E S
    99 57
    95 45
    90 38
    85 34

    The entire T.I.M.E. team wishes you all the best for your (final AIM) CAT!

    Page 2

    You might also like