Cmi Naac SSR PDF
Cmi Naac SSR PDF
Cmi Naac SSR PDF
Contents
1 Profile of the University 3
3.5 Consultancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
3.7 Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
December, 2015 1
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.3 IT Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
7.2 Innovations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
Mathematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
December, 2015 2
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
Website: http://www.cmi.ac.in
2. For communication:
Designation Name Telephone Mobile Fax Email
O: (044)
Vice +91
Prof. Rajeeva 67480906 (044) director@
Chancellor/ 81448
L. Karandikar R: (044) 27470225 cmi.ac.in
Director 13296
24513296
Pro Vice
N.A.
Chancellor(s)
O: (044)
+91
67480901 (044) sripathy@
Registrar S. Sripathy 94449
R: (044) 27470225 cmi.ac.in
94840
22530304
Steering
Committee/
N.A.
IQAC
Coordinator
O: (044)
+91
Madhavan 67480923 (044) madhavan@
Dean of Studies 94449
Mukund R: (044) 27470225 cmi.ac.in
92990
24570321
3. Status of the University:
√
State University
√
State Private University
√
University under Section 3 of UGC (Deemed University)
√
Institution of National Importance
√
Any other (please specify)
4. Type of University:
√
Unitary
√
Affiliating
December, 2015 3
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
5. Source of funding:
√
Central Government
√
State Government
√
Self-financing
√
Any other (please specify)
December, 2015 4
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
12. Provide information on the following: In case of multi-campus University, please provide
campus-wise information.
√
• Auditorium/seminar complex with infrastructural facilities
• Sports facilities
√
– Playground
– Swimming pool
√
– Gymnasium
– Any other (please specify)
• Hostel
– Boys’ hostel
i. Number of hostels: 1
ii. Number of inmates: 176
iii. Facilities: Internet, 24 Hours Power Supply (Two Generators are available in
case of EB power failure)
– Girls’ hostel
i. Number of hostels: 1
ii. Number of inmates: 25
iii. Facilities: Internet, 24 Hours Power Supply (Two Generators are available in
case of EB power failure)
– Working women’s hostel
i. Number of hostels: None
ii. Number of inmates: N.A.
iii. Facilities
• Residential facilities for faculty and non-teaching
No
• Cafeteria
Yes
December, 2015 5
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
14. Does the University Act provide for conferment of autonomy (as recognized by the UGC)
to its affiliated institutions? If yes, give the number of autonomous colleges under the juris-
diction of the University
√ √ √ √
Yes No Number N.A.
December, 2015 6
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
16. Does the university conform to the specification of Degrees as enlisted by the UGC?
√ √
Yes No
If the university uses any other nomenclatures, please specify.
17. Academic programmes offered by the university departments at present, under the following
categories: (Enclose the list of academic programmes offered)
Programmes Number
UG 2
PG 3
Integrated Masters –
M.Phil. –
Ph.D. 3
Integrated Ph.D. –
Certificate –
Diploma –
PG Diploma –
Any other (please specify) –
Total 8
18. Number of working days during the last academic year. 248
19. Number of teaching days during the past four academic years.
143 144 144 142
(‘Teaching days’ means days on which classes were engaged. Examination days are not to
be included.)
December, 2015 7
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
22. In the case of Private and Deemed Universities, please indicate whether professional pro-
grammes are being offered?
√ √
Yes No
If yes, please enclose approval / recognition details issued by the statutory body governing
the programme.
N.A.
23. Has the university been reviewed by any regulatory authority? If so, furnish a copy of the
report and action taken there upon.
Yes, the university has undergone annual reviews by UGC committees, as well as reviews
by an Expert Committee set up by NBHM, an Expert Committee set up by DST and the
P.N. Tandon Committee set up by UGC.
The reports of the annual UGC reviews are enclosed. The reports of the other committees
are available with the respective departments.
December, 2015 8
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 9
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
28. Students enrolled in the university departments during the current academic year, with the
following details:
Integ-
rated Integ- D.Litt. PG
Certi- Dip-
Students UG PG Mas- M.Phil.Ph.D. rated / Dip-
ficate loma
ters Ph.D. D.Sc. loma
*M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F *M *F
From the
state
where 7 M, 4 M, 13 M,
– – – – – – –
the uni- 4F 1F 1F
versity is
located
From
other 82 M, 61 M, 32 M,
– – – – – – –
states of 7F 6F 7F
India
NRI 0 M, 0 M, 0 M,
– – – – – – –
students 0F 0F 0F
Foreign 0 M, 0 M, 0 M,
– – – – – – –
students 0F 0F 0F
89 M, 65 M, 45 M,
Total – – – – – – –
11 F 7F 8F
*M – Male, *F – Female
29. Unit cost of education
(Unit cost = total annual recurring expenditure (actual) divided by total number of students
enrolled)
December, 2015 10
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
32. Does the university have a provision for external registration of students?
√ √
Yes No
If yes, how many students avail of this provision annually?
33. Is the university applying for Accreditation or Re-Assessment? If Accreditation, name the
cycle.
√ √ √ √
Accreditation: Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4
√
Re-Assessment:
34. Date of accreditation* (applicable for Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4 and re- assessment only)
Cycle 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dd/mm/yyyy),
Accreditation outcome/Result . . . . . . . . . .
Cycle 2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dd/mm/yyyy),
Accreditation outcome/Result . . . . . . . . . .
Cycle 3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dd/mm/yyyy),
Accreditation outcome/Result . . . . . . . . . .
Cycle 4: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dd/mm/yyyy),
Accreditation outcome/Result . . . . . . . . . .
35. Does the university provide the list of accredited institutions under its jurisdiction on its
website? Provide details of the number of accredited affiliated / constituent / autonomous
colleges under the university.
Not applicable.
36. Date of establishment of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and dates of submission
of Annual Quality Assurance Reports (AQAR).
IQAC has not been established.
37. Any other relevant data, the university would like to include:
CMI had been recognised as a deemed university under the de-novo category with a mandate
to pursue research and teaching in mathematical sciences. The funding structure of CMI is a
mix of public and private funding and is not covered by fees by students. Indeed, all eligible
students get fellowship from CMI. The number of students is small (as compared to most
universities) and we have a very small administrative staff, with just one officer (Registrar).
We have courses broadly in three areas: Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics. All
our faculty members are active researchers and have Ph.D. degrees. The education system
at CMI is similar to that followed at IITs, IISc, ISI, where the instructor of the course sets
the question paper and evaluates the answer books. Being a small institution, we have not
felt the need for setting up Internal Quality Assurance Cell, and we achieve this objective
via informal mechanisms.
Each year, CMI attracts several students from the Indian team for the International Math-
ematics Olympiad and International Olympiad in Informatics, as well as those who go for
final selection camps for these events.
A large proportion of graduates from CMI in the past decade have gone on to pursue further
studies at the best academic institutions in India and abroad, and a good proportion of these
December, 2015 11
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
have completed their Ph.D. The institutions where our students have gone for higher studies
include Berkeley, Caltech, Chicago, Harvard, MIT, NYU (Courant), Princeton, Penn, Yale
in USA, ENS Paris, ENS Cachan, Univ Paris-Sud and Univ Bordeaux in France, the Max
Planck Institutes and Humboldt University in Germany and the Harish-Chandra Research
Institute, IITs, IMSc, ISI and TIFR in India.
Over a dozen CMI graduates have returned to India after completing their doctoral studies
(Ph.D.) to take up academic positions at institutions like TIFR, CMI, IMSc, IIT Bombay,
IIT Kanpur, IISER Kolkata, IISER Mohali, IISER Pune as well as in research labs such
as Microsoft Research, ABB Research and IBM India Research Lab. An equal number, or
more, have faculty or postdoctoral research positions at academic and research institutions
across the world.
Students with a Ph.D. degree from CMI have taken up academic positions at IIT Bombay,
IIT Guwahati and IIM Indore.
CMI graduates have also moved into areas such as financial mathematics, management and
economics, both in India and abroad. The organizations where they have found placements
include IBM, TCS R&D, Veritas, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ICICI, Mu Sigma and
some startups.
December, 2015 12
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
1.1.2. Does the university follow a systematic process in the design and development of the
curriculum? If yes, give details of the process (need assessment, feedback, etc.).
Yes. CMI has four Boards of Studies, one each in Mathematics, Computer Science, and
Physics, and one for the undergraduate programme. These Boards are made up of senior
faculty members from CMI as well as external experts. The Boards meet regularly to
design, develop, and fine tune the curriculum. The recommendations of the Boards are
ratified by the Academic Council, which is made up of leading academicians from across
the country.
1.1.3. How are the following aspects ensured through curriculum design and development?
• Employability
The course contents are designed to equip students with skills to pursue careers in
research as well as to take up leading technical positions in industry.
• Innovation
The course content is regularly reviewed and updated to take into account changes
in the focus of academic research and technological advances in industry.
• Research
All teaching faculty are actively involved in research and students are encouraged
to participate in research alongside their regular courses.
1.1.4. To what extent does the university use the guidelines of the regulatory bodies for devel-
oping and/or restructuring the curricula? Has the university been instrumental in leading
any curricular reform which has created a national impact?
CMI follows UGC guidelines for the overall structure of the programmes.
1.1.5. Does the university interact with industry, research bodies and the civil society in the
curriculum revision process? If so, how has the university benefitted through interactions
with the stakeholders?
Yes. CMI has consistently interacted with industry. Many leading industrialists are
members of the CMI Trust. An important initiative that has come out of this exercise is
the formation of AlgoLabs—a meeting place for academicians and industry to work on
mutually beneficial projects.
December, 2015 13
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
1.1.6. Give details of how the university facilitates the introduction of new programmes of
studies in its affiliated colleges.
Not applicable.
1.1.7. Does the university encourage its colleges to provide additional skill-oriented programmes
relevant to regional needs? Cite instances (not applicable for unitary universities).
Not applicable.
1.2.2. Give details on the following provisions with reference to academic flexibility
December, 2015 14
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
consistently good academic records. Students also have the freedom to move across
disciplines when moving from BSc to MSc and MSc to PhD.
1.2.3. Does the university have an explicit policy and strategy for attracting international stu-
dents?
The Institute has active programmes for student exchanges with the Ecole Normale
Supérieure, Paris and Ecole Normale Supérieure, Cachan in France. CMI is also one
of two non-European partners in ALGANT, a multi-institution Masters programme in
Algeba, Geometry and Number Theory funded by the European Union. The Institute
also accepts international students selected and recommended by organizations such as
International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste.
1.2.4. Have any courses been developed targeting international students? If so, how successful
have they been? If ‘no’, explain the impediments.
No specific courses have been designed to target international students. The Institute has
signed an MoU with ENS Paris and ENS Cachan for regular exchanges of students. CMI
is a partner in ALGANT, a multi-institution master’s programme in Algebra, Geometry
and Number Theory funded by the European Union.
1.2.5. Does the university facilitate dual degree and twinning programmes? If yes, give details.
No
1.2.6. Does the university offer self-financing programmes? If yes, list them and indicate if
policies regarding admission, fee structure, teacher qualification and salary are at par
with the aided programmes?
No
1.2.7. Does the university provide the flexibility of bringing together the conventional face-to-
face mode and the distance mode of education and allow students to choose and combine
the courses they are interested in? If ‘yes’, give operational details.
No
1.2.8. Has the university adopted the Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)? If yes, for how
many programmes? What efforts have been made by the university to encourage the
introduction of CBCS in its affiliated colleges?
Yes. All programmes are covered by the credit system. In each programme, stu-
dents have to complete certain core requirements and the remaining credits are obtained
through elective courses.
• Annual system
0%
• Semester system
100%
• Trimester system
0%
December, 2015 15
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
1.2.10. How does the university promote inter-disciplinary programmes? Name a few pro-
grammes and comment on their outcome.
After completing the core requirements in each programme, students have great flexibil-
ity in choosing elective courses. Through a judicious combination of electives, students
can specialize in the subject of their choice. It is not uncommon for students to shift
from one stream to another. For example, a student with a physics degree at the under-
graduate level is presently pursuing a PhD in mathematics at MIT, USA. Other students
have shifted from physics to MSc in computer science. A student with an undergraduate
degree in physics from CMI has gone on to win the best PhD thesis award in Biological
Sciences from the American Physical Society.
1.3.2 During the last four years, how many new programmes at UG and PG levels were intro-
duced? Give details.
• Inter-disciplinary
None.
• Programmes in emerging areas
At the postgraduate level, a new programme, MSc Applications of Mathematics,
was started 2010, with two streams of specialisation—financial mathematics and
analytics. At the undergraduate level, a new programme, BSc (Honours) in Mathe-
matics and Physics, was started in 2012.
1.3.3 What are the strategies adopted for the revision of the existing programmes? What per-
centage of courses underwent a syllabus revision?
CMI has four Boards of Studies—one each in Mathematics, Computer Science, Physics,
and one for undergraduate studies. These boards periodically review the courses and their
contents. In each programme, the list of core courses is typically reviewed every 3 years.
For instance, in the current academic year, 2015–2016, the undergraduate programme
has been restructured to decrease the number of core courses and increase the number of
electives by about 30%, to enhance flexibility. Moreover, the curriculum of all mathe-
matics courses has been reviewed and updated. In all programmes, the list of electives is
updated every year to ensure that the curriculum remains aligned to contemporary trends
in each of the subjects.
1.3.4 What are the value-added courses offered by the university and how does the university
ensure that all students have access to them?
CMI has a steady stream of very distinguished visitors both from India and abroad. This
list includes Nobel Laureates, Field Medalists, Abel Prize Winners, and Fellows of the
December, 2015 16
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
Royal Societies. These visitors spend time at CMI giving lectures and interacting with
faculty and students.
Under the auspices of the CMI Arts Initiative, CMI supports two international writers
each year for a residency of 4-6 weeks. The objective of the CMI Arts Initiative is to
provide a space for students, professionals and anybody else keenly interested in the
humanities and arts to interact and learn from experts in these areas.
1.3.5 Has the university introduced any higher order skill development programmes in con-
sonance with the national requirements as outlined by the National Skills Development
Corporation and other agencies?
No
Any other information regarding Curricular Aspects which the university would
like to include.
December, 2015 17
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
several centres across the country. Entrance examination question papers from previous
years, with solutions, are posted on the CMI website.
After the entrance examination, the solutions to the question papers are put up on the
CMI website. All requests for re-evaluation of answer-books are honoured.
2.1.2. Explain in detail the process of admission put in place by the university. List the criteria
for admission: (e.g.: (i) merit, (ii) merit with entrance test, (iii) merit, entrance test and
interview, (iv) common entrance test conducted by state agencies and national agencies
(v) other criteria followed by the university (please specify).
Admission to the undergraduate programme at CMI is through a national entrance ex-
amination conducted at several centres across the country, with an optional interview
at the discretion of the Admissions Committee. In addition to this, direct admission is
offered to students who are selected for the national level camps in the Olympiads in
mathematics, informatics, and physics. For the MSc and PhD programmes, students are
selected based on their performance in CMI’s national entrance examination as well as
in external examinations such as JEST and NBHM, supplemented by interviews.
2.1.3. Provide details of admission process in the affiliated colleges and the university’s role in
monitoring the same.
Not applicable
2.1.4. Does the university have a mechanism to review its admission process and student profile
annually? If yes, what is the outcome of such an analysis and how has it contributed to
the improvement of the process?
CMI regularly reviews the admissions process and the student profile. The number of
centres where the entrance exam is conducted has grown steadily over the years. For
certain programmes, interviews have been introduced to supplement the entrance exam-
ination.
2.1.5. What are the strategies adopted to increase / improve access for students belonging to
the following categories:
• SC/ST
• OBC
• Women
• Persons with varied disabilities
• Economically weaker sections
• Outstanding achievers in sports and other extracurricular activities
CMI has relaxed cut-offs for SC/ST, OBC and general students during the admis-
sion process. CMI’s advertisement encourages students from SC/ST and OBC
categories, and people with disabilities to apply for admission. CMI offers schol-
arships to students that are substantial enough to cover their living expenses.
2.1.6. Number of students admitted in university departments in the last four academic years:
December, 2015 18
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 19
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
2.2.2. Does the university have a mechanism through which the “differential requirements of
the student population” are analysed after admission and before the commencement of
classes? If so, how are the key issues identified and addressed?
CMI students write a rigorous entrance examination, and the number of students overall
is not large, so the selection procedure ensures that all students are capable of coping
with the courses. However, each batch is assigned a faculty advisor who actively moni-
tors the progress of the students across all courses and recommends corrective action for
students who are not performing well.
2.2.3. Does the university offer bridge / remedial / add-on courses? If yes, how are they struc-
tured into the time table? Give details of the courses offered, department-wise/faculty-
wise?
CMI does not have such courses. However, each batch is assigned a faculty advisor
who actively monitors the progress of the students across all courses and recommends
corrective action for students who are not performing well. This includes personalized
assistance for such students.
2.2.4. Has the university conducted any study on the academic growth of students from disad-
vantaged sections of society, economically disadvantaged, physically handicapped, slow
learners, etc.? If yes, what are the main findings?
No
2.2.5. How does the university identify and respond to the learning needs of advanced learners?
Students who do well in the programme have several opportunities to advance their
knowledge and skills. There is sufficient flexibility in the system for them to take ad-
vanced courses. They can also sign up for reading courses on special topics with faculty
members. It is also common for students to take up research projects. Some of the
research done by undergraduate students has resulted in publications in international
peer reviewed journals. The institute has also instituted a prize, given during the annual
convocation, for the research done during the year by an undergraduate.
December, 2015 20
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
2.3.2. Does the university provide course outlines and course schedules prior to the commence-
ment of the academic session? If yes, how is the effectiveness of the process ensured?
The overall course structure along with the syllabus and other details is made available
on the CMI website. These details are updated on a regular basis.
2.3.3. Does the university face any challenges in completing the curriculum within the stipu-
lated time frame and calendar? If yes, elaborate on the challenges encountered and the
institutional measures to overcome these.
No
2.3.4. How is learning made student-centric? Give a list of participatory learning activities
adopted by the faculty that contributes to holistic development and improved student
learning, besides facilitating life-long learning and knowledge management.
The lectures are complemented and supplemented by assignments which the students
are expected to work out to improve their understanding of the subject. The faculty
members are available outside class hours to cater to any special needs the students may
have. Besides, every batch has a faculty advisor who facilitates the management of time,
learning and knowledge.
2.3.5. What is the university’s policy on inviting experts / people of eminence to deliver lectures
and/or organize seminars for students?
CMI has a steady stream of distinguished visitors who are experts in various fields who
deliver lectures and interact with students.
2.3.6. Does the university formally encourage blended learning by using e-learning resources?
CMI is covered by a wifi network and the library is open round the clock. The computer
lab is also open round the clock. Students are encouraged to use online resources to
supplement classroom material. CMI has state of the art computational facilities with
access to packages such as Mathematica, MatLab and Sage. CMI is also a part of the
National Knowledge Network.
2.3.7. What are the technologies and facilities such as virtual laboratories, e-learning, open
educational resources and mobile education used by the faculty for effective teaching?
Faculty members use the Moodle LMS as well as individual webpages to make course
material available.
2.3.8. Is there any designated group among the faculty to monitor the trends and issues regard-
ing developments in Open Source Community and integrate its benefits in the univer-
sity’s educational processes?
All the computer systems available for common use run open source software. The Com-
puter Committee, made up of faculty members, that regularly monitors and upgrades the
open source software on campus.
2.3.9. What steps has the university taken to orient traditional classrooms into 24×7 learning
places?
CMI is covered by a wifi network. The library and computer lab are open round the
clock.
December, 2015 21
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
2.3.10. Is there a provision for the services of counsellors / mentors/ advisors for each class
or group of students for academic, personal and psycho-social guidance? If yes, give
details of the process and the number of students who have benefitted.
Each batch of students in each discipline has a faculty advisor who acts as a friend,
philosopher and guide to cope with the academic requirements of the students.
The institute also engages a professional counsellor to help students cope with stress
arising from personal and academic issues. All students meet the counsellor when they
join CMI, to become acquainted. Subsequently, appointments are arranged based on
individual needs. Consultations between students and the counsellor are bound by a
professional confidentiality clause. Hence, no detailed statistics are available about the
number of students who make use of this facility. However, it has generally been ob-
served that many students do appreciate and benefit from having access to a professional
counsellor on the campus.
2.3.12. How does the university create a culture of instilling and nurturing creativity and scien-
tific temper among the learners?
CMI has a regular series of seminars and colloquia, both by faculty and students of CMI
and by visitors. This activity often goes beyond the subjects that CMI specialises in.
2.3.13. Does the university consider student projects mandatory in the learning programme? If
yes, for how many programmes have they been (percentage of total) made mandatory?
Student projects are not mandatory for undergraduate students. However, many students
do taken on summer projects, typically in academic institutions.
A project/dissertation is compulsory for the MSc Computer Science and MSc Mathemat-
ics programmes and is an option in the MSc Applications of Mathematics programme.
2.3.14. Does the university have a well qualified pool of human resource to meet the require-
ments of the curriculum? If there is a shortfall, how is it supplemented?
December, 2015 22
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
CMI has access to 50–60 full-time and part-time faculty, all with PhDs, for teaching
courses. CMI invites well-qualified guest faculty from other academic and research
institutions to teach courses in areas that are not within the range of expertise available
locally.
2.3.15. How are the faculty enabled to prepare computer-aided teaching/ learning materials?
What are the facilities available in the university for such efforts?
All faculty members are provided with computers for their individual use and are adept at
using software for preparing documents and preparations. All classrooms are equipped
with projection facilities. The learning management system Moodle is available to fac-
ulty to organize their course material and make it available online to students. CMI is
also a part of the National Knowledge Network.
2.3.16. Does the university have a mechanism for the evaluation of teachers by the students
/ alumni? If yes, how is the evaluation feedback used to improve the quality of the
teaching-learning process?
There is no formal mechanism for student feedback, but students do provide feedback
on individual courses via their faculty advisors and this is discussed by the faculty in
their regular meetings.
December, 2015 23
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
2.4.3. Does the university encourage diversity in its faculty recruitment? Provide the following
details (department / school-wise).
Department % of % of faculty % of faculty % of
/ School faculty from other from faculty
from the universities universities from
same within the outside the other
university State State countries
Mathematics 0.00% 10.00% 50.00% 40.00 %
Computer Science 0.00% 9.09% 54.55% 36.36 %
Physics 0.00% 0.00% 60.00% 40.00 %
2.4.4. How does the university ensure that qualified faculty are appointed for new programmes
/ emerging areas of study (Bio-technology, Bio-informatics, Material Science, Nan-
otechnology, Comparative Media Studies, Diaspora Studies, Forensic Computing, Ed-
ucational Leadership, etc.)? How many faculty members were appointed to teach new
programmes during the last four years?
The focus of CMI is on subjects related to the mathematical sciences. The Institute has
full time faculty in the areas of mathematics, computer science, physics and statistics.
Adjunct faculty have been appointed in related areas such as economics and mathemati-
cal finance. As the Institute’s activities expand in scope to areas related to mathematical
sciences, active steps will be taken to recruit new faculty in these areas.
2.4.5. How many Emeritus / Adjunct Faculty / Visiting Professors are on the rolls of the uni-
versity?
Emeritus: 1, Adjunct Faculty: 11
2.4.6. What policies/systems are in place to academically recharge and rejuvenate teachers
(e.g. providing research grants, study leave, nomination to national/international con-
ferences/ seminars, in- service training, organizing national/international conferences
etc.)?
CMI allows faculty members to take one year of sabbatical leave every six years, which
is the standard in leading academic institutions. Besides this, CMI has a very liberal
policy that encourages and supports faculty members to participate in and/or organise
workshops and national/international conferences. Research grants are available to sup-
port these activities from the Faculty Development Fund.
2.4.7. How many faculty received awards / recognitions for excellence in teaching at the state,
national and international level during the last four years?
Nil
2.4.8. How many faculty underwent staff development programmes during the last four years
(add any other programme if necessary)?
CMI faculty do not normally attend training programmes. Rather, CMI faculty serve as
resource persons for such programmes conducted by organizations such as NBHM in
Mathematics and IARCS/ACM in Computer Science.
December, 2015 24
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
2.4.10. How often does the university organize academic development programmes (e.g.: cur-
riculum development, teaching-learning methods, examination reforms, content / knowl-
edge management, etc.) for its faculty aimed at enriching the teaching-learning process?
Given the nature of the faculty and students at the Institute, there is no need perceived to
organize such programmes.
December, 2015 25
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
If yes, how have these schemes helped in enriching the quality of the faculty?
Participation in research activities through exchange visits, collaborations, conferences
and workshops is an integral part of the academic structure in place at CMI. The above
programmes have greatly contributed not only to enhance the research activities at CMI,
but also to showcase to the world the work being done at CMI.
2.5.2. What are the important examination reforms initiated by the university and to what ex-
tent have they been implemented in the university departments and affiliated colleges?
Cite a few examples which have positively impacted the examination management sys-
tem.
There is no centralized process for setting examinations. Examinations are set by the
individual instructors based on the material taught by them. This has been found to be
the most effective way to meaningfully assess students’ understanding of the material
taught in class.
2.5.3. What is the average time taken by the university for declaration of examination results?
In case of delay, what measures have been taken to address them? Indicate the mode /
media adopted by the university for the publication of examination results e.g. website,
SMS, email, etc.).
Results are announced within a fortnight for the odd semester and within a month for
the even semester.
The Dean of Studies monitors delays and ensures that the results are announced in a
timely manner.
Individual transcripts are prepared and distributed to the students by email.
2.5.4. How does the university ensure transparency in the evaluation process? What are the
rigorous features introduced by the university to ensure confidentiality?
December, 2015 26
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
The students are free to examine their corrected answer-books and request re- evaluation.
There is also a grade monitoring committee to ensure that there are no anomalies in the
grading process.
2.5.5. Does the university have an integrated examination platform for the following pro-
cesses?
2.5.6. Has the university introduced any reforms in its Ph.D. evaluation process?
CMI follows a standard procedure whereby Ph.D. theses are sent to two external exam-
iners who provide written feedback. This is followed by an oral viva-voce examination.
No reform has been deemed necessary.
2.5.7. Has the university created any provision for including the name of the college in the
degree certificate?
Not applicable.
2.5.8. What is the mechanism for redressal of grievances with reference to examinations?
Students can raise their grievances with the concerned instructor, or the faculty advisor,
or the Dean of Studies.
2.5.9. What efforts have been made by the university to streamline the operations at the Office
of the Controller of Examinations? Mention any significant efforts which have improved
the process and functioning of the examination division/section.
Given the size of CMI, there is no separate Office of the Controller of Examinations. All
aspects of the examination process are handled by the administrative staff handling of
student affairs along with the Dean of Studies and the faculty advisors.
December, 2015 27
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
2.6.2. Does the university have clearly stated learning outcomes for its academic programmes?
If yes, give details on how the students and staff are made aware of these?
CMI is a centre for excellence in mathematics and related subjects. Students attending
the academic programmes are required to clear a specified set of core courses which are
designed to give them a certain degree of proficiency and have a choice of electives to
cater to their interests.
2.6.3. How are the university’s teaching, learning and assessment strategies structured to facil-
itate the achievement of the intended learning outcomes?
This is considered an integral part of our system.
2.6.4. How does the university collect and analyse data on student learning outcomes and use
it to overcome the barriers to learning?
Faculty advisors monitor the performance of students in courses and collect informal
feedback from students about difficulties faced. These are discussed in faculty meetings
to take corrective action, where necessary.
2.6.5. What are the new technologies deployed by the university in enhancing student learning
and evaluation and how does it seek to meet fresh/ future challenges?
Courses are taught in a traditional lecture format. However, class sizes are small and
interaction is encouraged. Most courses have assignments and projects in addition to
exams and the Moodle learning management system is available to instructors to orga-
nize their course material, collect submissions and deliver feedback.
Any other information regarding Teaching, Learning and Evaluation which the
university would like to include.
3.1.2. What is the policy of the university to promote research in its affiliated / constituent
colleges?
Not applicable
December, 2015 28
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.1.3. What are the proactive mechanisms adopted by the university to facilitate the smooth
implementation of research schemes/ projects?
December, 2015 29
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 30
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.1.6. How does the university facilitate researchers of eminence to visit the campus as adjunct
professors? What is the impact of such efforts on the research activities of the university?
CMI has a regular stream of very eminent and distinguished researchers including Nobel
Laureates, Abel Laureates, Fields Medallists, and members of the Royal Societies and
Academies. The Infosys Foundation has provided funding to establish a visiting chair
to invite distinguished faculty to spend extended periods at the institute. CMI also has a
residency programme under the auspices of which writers and artists of eminence spend
1–2 months at time at CMI.
These visits contribute greatly to the research activity on campus. They enable faculty
and students to explore new ideas and keep current with the latest ideas in circulation
across the world.
3.1.7. What percentage of the total budget is earmarked for research? Give details of heads of
expenditure, financial allocation and actual utilization.
About 60% of the budget is for faculty salaries. Research is an integral part of faculty
duties.
Another 10% of the budget is for the library, academic travel to conferences and inviting
visitors, all of which contribute to research productivity.
The remaining 30% is for basic recurring expenses such as maintenance, security, com-
munication, postage etc.
Hence, about 70% of the total budget may be deemed to be earmarked for research.
3.1.8. In its budget, does the university earmark funds for promoting research in its affiliated
colleges? If yes, provide details.
Not applicable.
December, 2015 31
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.1.9. Does the university encourage research by awarding Post Doctoral Fellowships/Research
Associateships? If yes, provide details like number of students registered, funding by
the university and other sources.
Yes, CMI has an active post-doctoral programme. Post-doctoral scholars are called vis-
iting faculty members and are supported by Institute fellowships. They are also en-
couraged to participate in the teaching programme to gain valuable teaching experience.
Some post-doctoral fellow are also supported through the INSPIRE and Ramanujan fel-
lowships of Department of Science and Technology (DST).
3.1.10. What percentage of faculty have utilized the sabbatical leave for pursuit of higher re-
search in premier institutions within the country and abroad? How does the university
monitor the output of these scholars?
25% of faculty have availed of sabbatical leave. Work done during the sabbatical is
included in the annual progress report submitted by each faculty member, which is used
to compile the annual report of the Institute.
3.1.11. Provide details of national and international conferences organized by the university
highlighting the names of eminent scientists/scholars who participated in these events.
December, 2015 32
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
Participants
• J Andersen (Aarhus)
• G. Berczi (Oxford)
• O. Biquard (ENS, Paris)
• P. Boalch (ENS, Paris)
• L. Brambila-Paz (Guanajuato)
• B. Collier (UIUC, Urbana)
• Du Pei (Caltech)
• E. Franco (Campinas)
• J. Heinloth (Essen)
• M. Garcia-Fernandez (ICMAT, Madrid)
• T. Gomez (ICMAT, Madrid)
• J. Iyer (Chennai)
• J. Hurtubise (McGill)
• I. Mundet i Riera (Barcelona)
• A. Oliveira (Porto)
• T. Pantev (Philadelphia)
• A.J. Parameswaran (Bombay)
• A. Peon (Heidelberg)
• B. Pym (Oxford)
• S. Ramanan (CMI, Chennai)
• C. Sabbah (Paris)
• F. Schaffhauser (Bogota)
• L. Schaposnik (UIUC, Urbana)
• S. Szabo (Budapest)
• G. Thompson (Trieste)
• S. Venugopalan (Chennai)
• F. Villegas (Trieste)
• J. Weitsman (Northeastern)
• R. Wentworth (Maryland)
• G. Wilkin (Singapore)
2. International Conference on Algebra, Geometry and History of Mathematics, in hon-
our of R. Sridharan on the occasion of his 80th birthday, July 2729, 2015
Organizers
V. Balaji (CMI), R. Parimala (Emory), C.S. Seshadri (CMI), R. Sujatha (TIFR), V.
Suresh (Emory)
Participants
• Ravi Rao - TIFR, Mumbai
• Sudhesh Khanduja - IISER, Mohali
• Nivedita Bhaskhar - Emory, Atlanta
• Preeti Raman - IITB, Mumbai
December, 2015 33
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 34
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 35
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 36
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 37
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 38
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 39
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 40
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 41
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
Prof. David Eisenbud (University of California, Berkeley, USA), who gave a series
of lectures on free resolutions. In addition to Prof. Eisenbud’s talks, there were a
series of lectures by experts in the area of syzygies and free resolutions.
Speakers for the preparatory workshop (17–22 December 2012):
• Krishna Hanumanthu, CMI, Siruseri.
• Manoj Kummini, CMI, Siruseri.
• Pramathanath Sastry, CMI, Siruseri.
• Sudhir Ghorpade, IIT Bombay, Mumbai.
Speakers at the workshop (24-28 December 2012).
• Srikanth Iyengar, University of Nebraska, USA.
• Jaya Iyer, IMSc, Chennai.
• Vikram Mehta, TIFR, Mumbai.
• Bangere Purnaprajna, University of Kansas, USA.
• S. Ramanan, CMI, Siruseri.
• Hema Srinivasan, University of Missouri, USA.
• Kavita Sutar-Deshpande, CMI, Siruseri.
16. Ninth AFS-1, NBHM Advanced Training in Mathematics School, December 2012
This AFS covered Algebra, Analysis and Topology and Geometry. The resource
persons were:
(i) S. Senthamarai Kannan, CMI
(ii) Krishna Hanumanthu, CMI
(iii) S. Vishwanath, IMSc
(iv) Purusottam Rath, CMI
(v) Amritanshu Prasad, IMSc
(vi) B.V. Rao, CMI
(vii) M. Sundari, CMI
(viii) E.K. Narayanan, IISc
(ix) Priyavrat Deshpande, CMI
(x) Sukhendu Mehrotra, CMI
(xi) Vimala Ramani, Anna University
(xii) Mahan Mj, RKM Vivekananda University
17. Formal Methods Update Meeting 2012, July 2012
This is an annual event where speakers present recent developments in areas related
to formal methods. The list of talks at the workshop was as follows:
(i) Deepak D’Souza, IISc
Program Analysis Techniques for Under and Over Approximations
(ii) Shibashis Guha, IIT Delhi
Prebisimulation for Timed Automata
(iii) Kamal Lodaya, IMSc
Verification of Probabilistic Systems
(iv) Bastien Maubert, IRISA
Dependence Logic
December, 2015 42
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 43
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 44
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
21. Advanced Instructional School (sponsored by NBHM) on Lie Algebras during July
2011 at Chennai Mathematical Institute (CMI) and Institute of Mathematical Sci-
ences (IMSc)
This AIS aimed to develop basics of the theory as the classification of the algebras
by means of root systems, the structure of an algebra in terms of a Cartan subal-
gebra and root spaces, complete reducibility of representations, parametrization of
the irreducible representations by means of highest weights, well known character
formulas for representations, Chevalley groups and their basic properties and affine
Kac-Moody Lie algebras and their representations, up to the Kac-Weyl character for-
mula and the proof of the Macdonald identities.
Conveners: Upendra Kulkarni (CMI), K. N. Raghavan (IMSc), and S. Viswanath
(IMSc).
Resource persons:
• Punita Batra (HRI, Allahabad)
• Anuradha Garge (CEBS, Mumbai)
• Shripad Garge (IIT, Bombay)
• Senthamarai Kannan (CMI)
• Upendra Kulkarni (CMI),
• Brajesh Mishra (Allahabad University, Allahabad)
• K.N. Raghavan (IMSc)
• Ravindra
• P. Shukla (Allahabad University, Allahabad)
• Anupam Kumar Singh (IISER, Pune)
• K.V. Subrahmanyam (CMI)
• S. Viswanath (IMSc).
Unity of Mathematics lectures: In addition to the lectures on the syllabus proper, there
were two lectures on relations to physics (“The uses of Lie groups and Lie algebras
in physics”) by N. Mukunda, IISC, Bangalore and a lecture on relations to compu-
tational complexity (“Positivity and plethysms in geometric complexity theory”) by
Ketan Mulmuley.
22. Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems, ACTS III - January 2011
ACTS III is envisioned as a follow-up to the ACTS workshops held in CMI in January
2009 and February 2010 The main theme of the workshop is the use of logic and
automata for modelling and verifying distributed, open and timed systems.
Speakers:
(i) Benedikt Bollig, LSV, ENS Cachan - An automaton over data words that cap-
tures EMSO logic.
(ii) Tayssir Touili, LIAFA, Paris 7 - On Model Checking Multi-threaded recursive
programs.
(iii) Benoit Razet, TIFR, Mumbai - Tracing the decision procedure for regular ex-
pressions equality.
(iv) Nathalie Bertrand, INRIA - A game approach to determinize timed automata.
(v) Stefan Haar, INRIA/LSV, ENS Cachan - A Concurrency-Preserving Translation
from Time Petri Nets to Networks of Timed Automata.
December, 2015 45
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
(vi) Hugo Gimbert, LaBRI, Bordeaux - Stochastic Games with Partial Observation:
Decidable and Undecidable Problems.
(vii) Manfred Kufleitner, Stuttgart - On languages of dot-depth one over infinite
words.
(viii) Loic Helouet, IRISA - Diagnosis with Dynamic MSC Languages.
(ix) Paritosh Pandya, TIFR, Mumbai - Unambiguity in Timed Regular Languages:
Automata, Logics and Expressiveness.
(x) K. Vasanta Lakshmi, IISc., Bangalore - Verification of Requirement Specifica-
tions Using Counter Automata.
(xi) Yaron Velner, Tel Aviv - Church Synthesis Problem for Noisy Input.
(xii) Ramchandra Phawade, IMSc., Chennai - A Kleene functor for a subclass of net
systems.
(xiii) Soumya Paul, IMSc., Chennai - Neighbourhood structures in games.
(xiv) B. Srivathsan, LaBRI, Bordeaux - A lazy reachability algorithm for timed au-
tomata.
(xv) Supratik Chakraborty, IIT, Mumbai - Ranking function based disambiguation
techniques for Bchi automata.
(xvi) Stefan Schwoon, LSV, ENS Cachan - Towards an efficient contextual unfolder.
(xvii) S.P. Suresh, CMI, Chennai - A DEXPTIME-complete Dolev-Yao theory with
distributive encryption.
(xviii) Hrishikesh Karmarkar, IIT, Mumbai - Determinization of ?-automata unified.
(xix) Sylvain Salvati, LaBRI, Bordeaux - Towards an algebraic classification of rec-
ognizable sets of lambda-terms.
(xx) S. Akshay, NUS, Singapore - Approximate methods for probabilistic inference
in Dynamic Bayesian Networks.
(xxi) Deepak D’Souza, IISc. Bangalore - Conflict Tolerant Specifications for Hybrid
Systems.
(xxii) M Praveen, IMSc., Chennai - Small Vertex Cover makes Petri Net Coverability
and Boundedness Easier.
23. ICM satellite conference on Mathematical Logic and Set Theory - August 2010
In the successful tradition of logic satellite meetings at recent ICMs, CMI hold a satel-
lite conference on mathematical logic and set theory in India to provide a specialized
venue for logicians and set theorists connected with ICM 2010 in Hyderabad. The
conference was co-hosted by the Institute of Mathematical Sciences and the Chennai
Mathematical Institute on behalf of the Association for Logic in India. The scope of
the intended meeting is all of mathematical logic, including its areas of application
(theoretical computer science, algebraic logic and others).
(i) Theodore A. Slaman,University of California, U.S.A. - Structures Recursive in
a Random Real.
(ii) Dilip Raghavan, University of Toronto, Canada - Cofinal types of ultrafilters.
(iii) Andre Nies, University of Auckland, New Zealand - Borel Structures.
(iv) Justin T. Moore, Cornell University, U.S.A. - Forcing Axioms and the Contin-
uum Hypothesis.
(v) Andrew Brooke-Taylor, University of Bristol - Zero-one laws for Fraisse limits
over infinite languages.
December, 2015 46
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
(vi) Gunnar Wilken, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Japan - Tracking
Chains of σ2 -Elementarity.
(vii) Denis I. Saveliev, Moscow State University, Russia - Groupoids of ultrafilters.
(viii) Anand Pillay, University of Leeds, U.K. - Measures in model theory.
(ix) Joan Bagaria, ICREA & Universitat de Barcelona, Spain - Structural Reflection
and the Hierarchy of C(n) cardinals.
(x) Janak Ramakrishnan, Universit Claude Bernard, France - Definable linear or-
ders definably embed into lexicographic orders in o-minimal structures.
(xi) Cedric Milliet, Universit Claude Bernard, France - Groups with few types.
(xii) Menachem Magidor,Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel - Square like prinic-
ples and Forcing axioms.
(xiii) Rob Goldblatt, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand - Elementary
Classes Generating Varieties of Complex Algebras.
(xiv) S.M. Srivastava, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata - Stochastic Kripke models.
(xv) Kobi Peterzil, University of Haifa, Israel - O-minimal ingredients in solutions
to arithmetic conjectures in Algebraic Geometry.
(xvi) Wolfgang Thomas, Rheinisch-Westflische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Ger-
many - Refining determinacy results for infinite games.
24. Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems (ACTS) II - February 2010
ACTS II (sponsored by the CMI-TCS Academic Alliance) is envisioned as a follow-
up to the ACTS workshop held in CMI in January 2009.
The main theme of the workshop is the use of logic and automata for modelling and
verifying distributed, open and timed systems.
(i) Dietmar Berwanger (LSV, ENS Cachan): Information tracking in distributed
games.
(ii) Benedikt Bollig (LSV, ENS Cachan): Realizability of Dynamic MSC Lan-
guages.
(iii) Ahmed Bouajjani (LIAFA, Paris 7): On the Verification Problem for Weak
Memory Models.
(iv) Deepak D’Souza (IISc, Bangalore): On the equivalance of the pointwise and
continuous semantics of First-Order Logic with linear constraints.
(v) Laurent Doyen (LSV, ENS Cachan): Energy and Mean-payoff Games.
(vi) Paul Gastin (LSV, ENS Cachan): Weighted MSO versus Probabilistic Logics.
(vii) Stefan Haar (LSV, ENS Cachan): Event structure framework for supervising
partially observable systems.
(viii) Loic Helouet (IRISA, Rennes): Discovering covert channels with information
theory.
(ix) Akash Lal (MSR, Bangalore): Concurrency and Weighted Automata.
(x) Kamal Lodaya (IMSc, Chennai): LTL can be more succinct.
(xi) Antoine Meyer (Marne-la Vallee): Counting CTL.
(xii) Joel Ouaknine (Oxford): On Classical, Real-Time, and Time-Bounded Verifi-
cation.
(xiii) Paritosh Pandya (TIFR, Mumbai): Chop Expressions.
December, 2015 47
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
(xiv) Sylvain Salvati (LaBRI, Bordeaux): Recognizability in the simply typed lambda-
calculus.
(xv) Stefan Schwoon (LSV, ENS Cachan): Unfoldings of contextual Petri nets.
(xvi) S.P. Suresh (CMI, Chennai): Extensions of Dolev-Yao theory and the secrecy
problem.
(xvii) P.S. Thiagarajan (NUS, Singapore): Asynchronous Automata Based Approxi-
mations of Distributed Hybrid behaviors.
(xviii) Tayssir Touili (LIAFA, Paris 7): Reachability Analysis of Networks of Com-
municating Pushdown Systems.
(xix) James Worrell (Oxford): Reachability in Parametric One-Counter Machines.
25. Sixth AFS-1, NBHM Advanced Training in Mathematics School Funded by National
Board for Higher Mathematics
AFS-I organised in Chennai in December 2009 was the first of the 6th Annual Foun-
dation Schools organised on behalf of NBHM.
Algebra
Analysis
December, 2015 48
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 49
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 50
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
(i) Dietmar Berwanger (LSV, ENS Cachan) The order of moves in a game: When
does it matter?
(ii) Benedikt Bollig (LSV, ENS Cachan) Realizability of Concurrent Recursive Pro-
grams
(iii) Patricia Bouyer (LSV, ENS Cachan) Quantitative timed games
(iv) Philippe Darondeau (INRIA Rennes). Opacity control
(v) Volker Diekert (FMI, Stuttgart) Fragments of first-order logic over infinite words
(vi) Deepak D’Souza (IISc Bangalore) Automata and Logics over Signals
(vii) Paul Gastin (LSV, ENS Cachan). How to get decidability of distributed synthe-
sis for asynchronous systems
(viii) Hugo Gimbert (LaBRI, U. Bordeaux) Qualitative Determinacy and Decidability
of Stochastic Games with Partial Observation
(ix) Stefan Haar (LSV, ENS Cachan). Diagnosability and a covering relation in
occurrence nets
(x) Hrishikesh Karmakar (IIT Bombay). Improved state-count for determinization
of non-deterministic Buchi automata: A Safra-tree based approach
(xi) K. Narayan Kumar (CMI, Chennai) Analyzing time-constrained message se-
quence graphs
(xii) Dietrich Kuske (IfI, Leipzig) Which local temporal logics for traces are tractable?
(xiii) Kamal Lodaya (IMSc, Chennai) Around dot-depth two
(xiv) Anca Muscholl (LaBRI, U. Bordeaux) A look at the control of asynchronous
automata
(xv) Paritosh Pandya (TIFR, Mumbai) A Sampling Approach to the Analysis of Met-
ric Temporal Logic
(xvi) Soumya Paul (IMSc, Chennai). Thiagarajan’s conjecture
(xvii) M. Praveen (IMSc, Chennai). Petri nets with small path property
(xviii) R. Ramanujam (IMSc, Chennai) Counting multiplicity over infinite alphabets
(xix) Abhisekh Sankaran (IIT Bombay). A FOL Fragment for Safety Checking in
Infinite State Systems
(xx) Anil Seth (IIT, Kanpur). Parity Games on Multi-Stack Pushdown Systems
(xxi) Vijay Suman (TIFR Bombay). Determinization and Expressiveness of Integer
Reset Timed Automata with Silent Transitions
(xxii) Pascal Weil (LaBRI, U. Bordeaux) Independence monoids and recognizable
trace languages
(xxiii) Marc Zeitoun (LaBRI, U. Bordeaux) Tree Pattern Rewriting Systems
(xxiv) Wiesiek Zielonka (LIAFA, Paris). Positional equilibria in infinite perfect infor-
mation games
30. Perspectives in Concurrency Theory on the occasion of P.S. Thiagarajan’s 60th birth-
day December 15?16, 2008.
Speakers
(i) Gerard Boudol, INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis: True concurrency at work: relaxed
memory models
(ii) Javier Esparza, TU Muenchen: Scheduling stochastic branching processes
December, 2015 51
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.2.2. Has the university taken any special efforts to encourage its faculty to file for patents? If
so, how many have been registered and accepted?
Not Applicable.
December, 2015 52
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.2.5. How many departments of the university have been recognized for their research activ-
ities by national / international agencies (UGC-SAP, CAS; Department with Potential
for Excellence; DST-FIST; DBT, ICSSR, ICHR, ICPR, etc.) and what is the quantum of
assistance received? Mention any two significant outcomes or breakthroughs achieved
by this recognition.
The mathematics department has been recognised by DST through the award of a FIST
grant.
CMI is also one of two non-European partners in ALGANT, a multi-institution Masters
programme in Algeba, Geometry and Number Theory funded by the European Union.
CMI also has exchange programmes with the Ecole Normale Superieure and Ecole Poly-
technique, of France.
December, 2015 53
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
(a) research projects completed and grants received during the last four years (funded
by National/International agencies).
Insert table
December, 2015 54
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 55
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.3.2. Does the university have an Information Resource Centre to cater to the needs of re-
searchers? If yes, provide details of the facility.
No
3.3.3. Does the university have a University Science Instrumentation Centre (USIC)? If yes,
have the facilities been made available to research scholars? What is the funding allotted
to USIC?
No
3.3.4. Does the university provide residential facilities (with computer and internet facilities)
for research scholars, post-doctoral fellows, research associates, summer fellows of var-
ious academies and visiting scientists (national/international)?
Yes
3.3.5. Does the university have a specialized research centre/ workstation on-campus and off-
campus to address the special challenges of research programmes?
No
3.3.6. Does the university have centres of national and international recognition/repute? Give
a brief description of how these facilities are made use of by researchers from other
laboratories.
CMI as an institute is recognised both nationally and internationally for its research
and teaching. It has a vibrant internship programme through which students from other
universities/institutes visit CMI and benefit by interacting with the faculty and students.
CMI is also one of two non-European partners in ALGANT, a multi-institution Masters
programme in Algeba, Geometry and Number Theory funded by the European Union.
CMI also has exchange programmes with the Ecole Normale Superieure and Ecole Poly-
technique, of France.
CMI is a partner in an International Associated Laboratory (LIA) on Formal Methods
set up by the French National Centre for Research in Science (CNRS).
CMI is also a partner in the Indo-US Virtual Institute for Mathematical and Statistical
Sciences (VI-MSS) jointly funded by the National Science Foundation, USA and the
Department of Science and Technology, India.
December, 2015 56
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 57
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 58
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
CMI faculty publish their research in international journals and conferences that
are recognized by the academic community as the leading publication outlets in
the corresponding areas.
December, 2015 59
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 60
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
(d) FM, Formal Methods - 15th International Symposium, Abo Akademi Uni-
versity, Turku, Finland, 2008.
(e) FSTTCS, Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer
Science
∗ 34th Conference, Delhi, 2014.
∗ 32nd Conference, Hyderabad, 2012.
∗ 28th Conference, Bangalore, 2008 (co-chair).
∗ 26th Conference, Kolkata, 2006.
(f) ICALP, International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Program-
ming
∗ 41st Colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014.
∗ 35th Colloquium, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2008.
∗ 33rd Colloquium, Venice, Italy, 2006.
(g) LICS, Logic in Computer Science
∗ 30th Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, 2015.
∗ 28th Symposium, New Orleans, USA, 2013.
(h) MFCS, Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
∗ 39th International Symposium, Budapest, Hungary, 2014.
∗ 38th International Symposium, IST, near Vienna, Austria, 2013.
∗ 35th International Symposium, Brno, Czech Republic, 2010.
∗ 32nd International Symposium, Cesky Krumlov, Czech Republic, 2007.
(i) Petri Nets, International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri
Nets and Concurrency
∗ 36th Conference, Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
∗ 35th Conference, Tunis, Tunisia, 2014.
∗ 33rd Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 2012.
∗ 32nd Conference, Kanazawa, Japan (relocated to Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
UK), 2011.
∗ 31st Conference, Braga, Portugal, 2010.
∗ 30th Conference, Paris, France, 2009.
∗ 29th Conference, Xian, China, 2008.
∗ 27th Conference, Turku, Finland, 2006.
∗ 26th Conference, Miami, Florida, 2005.
(j) SEFM, IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and For-
mal Methods
∗ 9th Conference, Montevideo, Uruguay, 2011.
∗ 8th Conference, Pisa, Italy, 2010.
∗ 7th Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2009.
∗ 4th Conference, Pune, India, 2006.
(k) STACS, Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, 23rd
Symposium, Marseilles, France, 2006.
(l) TACAS, International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Con-
struction and Analysis of Systems, 16th Conference, Paphos, Cyprus,
2010. K. Narayan:
December, 2015 61
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 62
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 63
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.4.5. Indicate the average number of successful M.Phil. and Ph.D. scholars guided per faculty
during the last four years. Does the university participate in Shodhganga by depositing
the Ph.D. theses with INFLIBNET for electronic dissemination through open access?
The Institute has no M.Phil students. Currently there are two PhD students per faculty
and in the last four years 0.23 students per faculty has been awarded PhD. CMI has tried
to register with Shodhganga, but the process has not been completed.
3.4.6. What is the official policy of the university to check malpractices and plagiarism in
research? Mention the number of plagiarism cases reported and action taken.
The institute has a zero-tolerance policy towards malpractice and plagiarism. No cases
of plagiarism have been reported from CMI.
3.4.7. Does the university promote interdisciplinary research? If yes, how many interdepart-
mental / interdisciplinary research projects have been undertaken and mention the num-
ber of departments involved in such endeavours?
Researchers have complete freedom in pursuing research in the topic of their choice
and these often cut across disciplines. Also, CMI has a vibrant programme of research
seminars throughout the year, combined with regular visits by distinguished academic
visitors. This fosters an atmosphere where cross-fertilization of ideas is naturally en-
couraged.
December, 2015 64
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.4.8. Has the university instituted any research awards? If yes, list the awards.
The Dr. S. Parthasarathy Commemorative Prize is awarded for exceptional research
work at the undergraduate level.
3.4.9. What are the incentives given to the faculty for receiving state, national and international
recognition for research contributions?
No special incentives are considered necessary. Recruitment and promotion is based on
research productivity.
3.5 Consultancy
3.5.1. What is the official policy of the university for structured consultancy? List a few im-
portant consultancies undertaken by the university during the last four years.
Faculty members are permitted to take on external consultancy projects, so long as the
time spent on this activity does not interfere with regular teaching and research.
Sample projects
3.5.2. Does the university have a university-industry cell? If yes, what is its scope and range
of activities?
CMI has recently started a society called AlgoLabs, a meeting place for academicians
and industry to work on mutually beneficial projects.
3.5.3. What is the mode of publicizing the expertise of the university for consultancy services?
Which are the departments from whom consultancy has been sought?
One of the goals of AlgoLabs is to publicize the expertise available at CMI.
3.5.4. How does the university utilize the expertise of its faculty with regard to consultancy
services?
CMI only takes on projects that involve significant mathematical modelling. Depending
on the domain, appropriate faculty members are assigned to oversee these projects.
3.5.5. List the broad areas of consultancy services provided by the university and the revenue
generated during the last four years.
Education and training: Rs 50 lakhs (TCS, final year, 2011)
Algorithms and modelling: Rs 30 lakhs (PXIL, Hexaware)
Analytics: Rs 6 lakhs (Cognizant)
December, 2015 65
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
3.6.2. How does the university promote university-neighbourhood network and student en-
gagement, contributing to the holistic development of students and sustained community
development?
CMI conducts outreach programmes where students from schools throughout the city
visit the campus and are exposed to concepts from the mathematical sciences.
3.6.3. How does the university promote the participation of the students and faculty in exten-
sion activities including participation in NSS, NCC, YRC and other National/ Interna-
tional programmes?
These programmes are not present in CMI.
3.6.4. Give details of social surveys, research or extension work, if any, undertaken by the uni-
versity to ensure social justice and empower the underprivileged and the most vulnerable
sections of society?
None
3.6.5. Does the university have a mechanism to track the students’ involvement in various
social movements / activities which promote citizenship roles?
No
3.6.6. Bearing in mind the objectives and expected outcomes of the extension activities orga-
nized by the university, how did they complement students’ academic learning experi-
ence? Specify the values inculcated and skills learnt.
Not applicable
3.6.7. How does the university ensure the involvement of the community in its outreach ac-
tivities and contribute to community development? Give details of the initiatives of the
university which have encouraged community participation in its activities.
Not applicable
3.6.8. Give details of awards received by the institution for extension activities and/contributions
to social/community development during the last four years.
None
3.7 Collaboration
3.7.1 How has the university’s collaboration with other agencies impacted the visibility, iden-
tity and diversity of activities on campus? To what extent has the university benefitted
academically and financially because of collaborations?
December, 2015 66
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
CMI has had active support from agencies such as the Indo-French Centre for Promo-
tion of Advanced Research (IFCPAR) and the Indo-US Science and Technology Fo-
rum(IUSSTF). This has established CMI’s reputation as an internationally renowned
centre for research in mathematical sciences.
The CMI Arts Initiative has been set up to provide opportunities for students and faculty
to to interact and learn from experts in the humanities and arts. In addition to organizing
2-3 day courses on special topics, the CMI Arts Initiative collaborates with Sangam
House, an international writers’ residency program based in Bangalore, to support two
writers in residence at CMI each year.
• Curriculum development
• Internship
• On-the-job training
• Faculty exchange and development
• Research
• Publication
• Consultancy
• Extension
• Student placement
• Any other (please specify)
Activities organized in collaboration IFCPAR and IUSSTF have resulted in ex-
change visits, research collaborations and workshops.
The CMI Arts Initiative has enabled students to interact with international writers
from different countries and get a valuable insight into ideas and cultures across the
world.
3.7.3 Has the university signed any MoUs with institutions of national/international impor-
tance/other universities/ industries/corporate houses etc.? If yes, how have they enhanced
the research and development activities of the university?
At the national level, CMI has signed an MoU with the Institute of Mathematical Sci-
ences, IISER Pune, and the Indian Statistical Institute. At the international level, CMI
has signed an MoU with the Ecole Normale Superieure in France.
3.7.4 Have the university-industry interactions resulted in the establishment / creation of highly
specialized laboratories / facilities?
CMI is part of an International Associated Laboratory (LIA) on Formal Methods, estab-
lished by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS).
December, 2015 67
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 68
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.1.6. How does the university cater to the requirements of residential students? Give details
of
• Capacity of the hostels and occupancy (to be given separately for men and women)
96 rooms for men and 16 for women
• Recreational facilities in hostel/s like gymnasium, yoga centre, etc.
The hostel has a common room with TV, gym, library, etc. There are also open
playgrounds with facilities for volleyball, basketball, cricket and football.
• Broadband connectivity / wi-fi facility in hostels.
The hostel is covered by the campus-wide wireless network and students have 24
hour access to the Institute’s high-speed Internet link.
4.1.7. Does the university offer medical facilities for its students and teaching and non-teaching
staff living on campus?
We have an arrangemenet with Chettinad Hospitals, nearby, to provide immediate care
to students in case of a medical emergency. There is a vehicle available 24/7 on campus
to transport students to the hospital, if needed.
4.1.8. What special facilities are available on campus to promote students’ interest in sports
and cultural events/activities?
The hostel has basketball and volleyball courts and a playground for the students to play
cricket and football. There is a cultural committee and film club run by students, both
of which are active.
December, 2015 69
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
• Working hours (on working days, on holidays, before examination, during exami-
nation, during vacation)
Open 24 hours, 365 days
• Layout of the library (individual reading carrels, lounge area for browsing and
relaxed reading, IT zone for accessing e- resources)
All the reading tables have facility to connect personal laptops. Free wi-fi is avail-
able. Area for relaxed reading is present. Computer terminals also present to look
up the OPAC and also access the Internet.
• Clear and prominent display of floor plan; adequate sign boards; fire alarm; access
to differently-abled users and mode of access to collection
Adequate information regarding shelving of collections is displayed for each floor
and shelf wise. Fire alarm is installed.
4.2.4. What tools does the library deploy to provide access to the collection?
• OPAC
Yes
• Electronic Resource Management package for e-journals
Yes
• Federated searching tools to search articles in multiple databases
No
• Library Website
Yes
December, 2015 70
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.2.5. To what extent is ICT deployed in the library? Give details with regard to
• Library automation
Library is fully automated. Catalogue is available online. Members are issued
RFID tagged library cards. Circulation is via an electronic RFID-enabled kiosk
without human intervention.
• Total number of computers for general access
Two
• Total numbers of printers for general access
One
• Internet band width
100 mbps
• Institutional Repository
No
• Content management system for e-learning
Not applicable
• Participation in resource sharing networks/consortia (like INFLIBNET)
INFLIBNET, Consortia - MathSciNet
4.2.7. Give details of specialized services provided by the library with regard to
December, 2015 71
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
• Manuscripts
Nil
• Reference
Separate Reference Section is available in the library
• Reprography/Scanning
Scanner is available in the library
• Inter-library Loan Service
ILL service for books and journals are provided
• Information Deployment and Notification
Notifications are sent via emails
• OPACS
OPAC is available
• Internet Access
Free wi-fi with access to the Institute’s high-speed Internet link.
• Downloads
Members can download using the terminal/personal laptops
• Printouts
Printouts can be taken
• Reading list/ Bibliography compilation
Lists can be generated by the members depending on their interest using OPAC
• In-house/remote access to e-resources
Available
• User Orientation
Orientation is conducted for new members
• Assistance in searching Databases
No databases
• INFLIBNET/IUC facilities
CMI library is part of INFLIBNET
4.2.8. Provide details of the annual library budget and the amount spent for purchasing new
books and journals.
Budget for the year 2014-15: Rs.37,50,000/=
Spent: Rs.27,54,503/=
4.2.9. What initiatives has the university taken to make the library a ‘happening place’ on
campus?
Students and faculty at CMI are naturally inclined to make active use of the library and
no special initiatives are required to attract users to the library.
4.2.10. What are the strategies used by the library to collect feedback from its users? How is
the feedback analysed and used for the improvement of the library services?
Users are free to provide feedback. The library committee which meets periodically
analyses the feedback and takes necessary steps towards improvement.
December, 2015 72
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.2.11. List the efforts made towards the infrastructural development of the library in the last
four years.
(i) RFID technology was introduced in 2010 to fully automate Check-in / Check-out
to ensure that members can use the library 24 hours.
(ii) Seating capacity was increased.
(iii) Leisure reading area was added.
(iv) Facility to connect personal laptops was provided on every reading table.
4.3 IT Infrastructure
4.3.1. Does the university have a comprehensive IT policy with regard to
• IT Service Management
The IT infrastructure is managed by the Computer Committee, made up of faculty
members, together with some technical staff. These issues are typically addressed
by this group of people.
• Information Security
All sensitive information is stored securely. Faculty and student data are stored on
separate servers with strict permissions for access.
• Network Security
Firewalls are in place to prevent unauthorized access to the network from outside
the Institute.
• Risk Management
Essential services are being moved to virtual servers that can be copied and de-
ployed on backup hardware in case of physical server failure. Regular backups are
taken of user data and all sensitive data.
• Software Asset Management
Almost all the software used at CMI is open source. This is updated regularly to
the latest versions, with security fixes as required. Commercial software is used
for accounts, which is maintained and updated regularly. Matlab is installed on a
central server for scientific computation.
• Open Source Resources
Almost all the software used at CMI is open source.
• Green Computing
The institute does not have power intensive servers.
4.3.2. Give details of the university’s computing facilities i.e., hardware and software.
December, 2015 73
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.3.3. What are the institutional plans and strategies for deploying and upgrading the IT infras-
tructure and associated facilities?
The IT infrastructure is managed by the Computer Committee, made up of faculty mem-
bers, together with some technical staff. This group monitors the state of the current
hardware and prepares plans for replacement/expansion of machines.
4.3.4. Give details on access to on-line teaching and learning resources and other knowledge
and information database/packages provided to the staff and students for quality teach-
ing, learning and research.
Students can access course material taught at CMI through the Moodle LMS as well as
individual webpages of faculty members. All library data is available online through
Koha.
All students and faculty have 24/7 Internet access through a high-speed connection and
are able to reach out to online educational content throughout the world.
4.3.5. What are the new technologies deployed by the university in enhancing student learning
and evaluation during the last four years and how do they meet new / future challenges?
The Moodle LMS has been deployed extensively in the last 4 years and has helped
to make course material available more readily to students as well as to provide for
systematic collection and assessment of assignments.
December, 2015 74
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.3.6. What are the IT facilities available to individual teachers for effective teaching and qual-
ity research?
All faculty members have individual laptops/desktops with 24/7 internet connectivity.
All classrooms have facilities to project lecture material, in addition to traditional black-
boards.
4.3.7. Give details of ICT-enabled classrooms/learning spaces available within the university?
How are they utilized for enhancing the quality of teaching and learning?
There is one video-enabled classroom connected to the National Knowledge Network.
All other classrooms have internet connectivity and facilities for projecting course ma-
terial.
4.3.8. How are the faculty assisted in preparing computer-aided teaching-learning materials?
What are the facilities available in the university for such initiatives?
Faculty typically prepare such material on their own. There is a systems engineer to
assist with technical issues.
4.3.10. Does the university avail of the National Knowledge Network connectivity? If so, what
are the services availed of?
CMI has a video classroom set up through the National Knowledge Network. Due to
technical issues with the location of the campus, the actual NKN network connectivity
has not yet reached CMI. Nevertheless, the classroom is being used regularly to share
lectures with other institutions using CMI’s existing internet connection.
4.3.11. Does the university avail of web resources such as Wikipedia, dictionary and other edu-
cation enhancing resources? What are its policies in this regard?
Students and faculty regularly use resources on the Internet to supplement the material
available in textbooks and other traditional printed material.
4.3.12. Provide details on the provision made in the annual budget for the update, deployment
and maintenance of computers in the university.
The budget for maintenance and replacement of computers in 2014–2015 was approxi-
mately Rs 50 lakhs.
4.3.13. What plans have been envisioned for the gradual transfer of teaching and learning from
closed university information network to open environment?
CMI has always placed all its teaching material on a publicly accessible website. CMI’s
Moodle page is also accessible from outside the Institute.
December, 2015 75
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
4.4..2 How are the infrastructure facilities, services and equipments maintained? Give details.
The Institute has a very small core of permanent administrative staff. External contract-
based services are used for housekeeping, gardening, catering, electrical and computer
maintenance and security.
5.1.2. Apart from classroom interaction, what are the provisions available for academic men-
toring?
Faculty are easily accessible to the students. Students may approach teachers any time
they have questions. In addition, most instructors have teaching assistants to help the
students.
5.1.3. Does the university have any personal enhancement and development schemes such as
career counselling, soft skill development, career-path-identification, and orientation to
well-being for its students? Give details of such schemes.
Faculty have regular contact with students to continuously help them with all matters
related to their career.
5.1.4. Does the university provide assistance to students for obtaining educational loans from
banks and other financial institutions?
CMI charges very nominal fees and provides tuition waivers and scholarships to students
by default, so there is no requirement for educational loans.
5.1.5. Does the university publish its updated prospectus and handbook annually? If yes, what
are the main issues / activities / information included / provided to students through these
documents? Is there a provision for online access?
CMI annually publishes a brochure at the time of admission with all the relevant aca-
demic details. This brochure is available online on the CMI website. All other informa-
tion is also easily accessible on the website.
December, 2015 76
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
5.1.6. Specify the type and number of university scholarships / freeships given to the students
during the last four years. Was financial aid given to them on time? Give details (in a
tabular
All fresh students (BSc/MSc/PhD) receive scholarship and it is given at the end of each
month. The continuation of the scholarship depends on the academic performance of
the student.
5.1.7. What percentage of students receive financial assistance from state government, central
government and other national agencies (Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana (KVPY),
SN Bose Fellow, etc.)?
20%
5.1.8. Does the university have an International Student Cell to attract foreign students and
cater to their needs?
Not considered necessary at this time.
5.1.9. Does the university provide assistance to students for obtaining educational loans from
banks and other financial institutions?
CMI charges very nominal fees and provides tuition waivers and scholarships to students
by default, so there is no requirement for educational loans.
• overseas students
• physically challenged / differently-abled students
• SC/ST, OBC and economically weaker sections
• students participating in various competitions/conferences in India and abroad
• health centre, health insurance etc.
• skill development (spoken English, computer literacy, etc.)
• performance enhancement for slow learners
• exposure of students to other institutions of higher learning/ corporates/business
houses, etc.
• publication of student magazines
All students receive continuous support of the faculty and the university as a whole. No
separate support services are considered necessary at this time. Students who are going
to participate in conferences get strong support in terms of guidance for preparation of
their presentation and in deserving cases, financial assistance.
5.1.11. Does the university provide guidance and/or conduct coaching classes for students ap-
pearing for Civil Services, Defence Services, NET/SET and any other competitive ex-
aminations? If yes, what is the outcome?
Students from CMI do not typially appear for these kinds of examinations.
5.1.12. Mention the policies of the university for enhancing student participation in sports and
extracurricular activities through strategies / schemes such as
December, 2015 77
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
5.1.13. Does the university have an institutionalized mechanism for students’ placement? What
are the services provided to help students identify job opportunities, prepare themselves
for interview, and develop entrepreneurship skills?
There is no formal placement cell. Two faculty members are assigned to coordinate cam-
pus placement activities. Prospective employers visit the campus to make presentations
and conduct selection tests/interviews.
5.1.14. Give the number of students selected during campus interviews by different employers
(list the employers and the number of companies who visited the campus during the last
four years).
The number of companies visiting the campus each year is about 10–15. These in-
clude Bally Technologies, Canon, Credit Suisse, Crisil, Ernst and Young, Ford, Goldman
Sachs, Google, iNautix, Mu Sigma, Oracle, Standard Chartered and Tata Consultancy
Services.
5.1.15. Does the university have a registered Alumni Association? If yes, what are its activities
and contributions to the development of the university?
CMI has an alumni association. It supports the current students by funding their activi-
ties, helping them with applications for higher studies and enabling better communica-
tion between past and present students.
5.1.16. Does the university have a student grievance redressal cell? Give details of the nature of
grievances reported. How were they redressed?
Not considered necessary at this time.
5.1.17. Does the university promote a gender-sensitive environment by (i) conducting gender
related programmes (ii) establishing cell and mechanism to deal with issues related to
sexual harassment? Give details.
The Disciplinary Committee deals with this matter. No instances of sexual harassment
have been reported at CMI.
5.1.18. Is there an anti-ragging committee? How many instances, if any, have been reported
during the last four years and what action has been taken in these cases?
There is a Disciplinary Committee that deals with this. No instances of ragging have
been reported at CMI.
5.1.19. How does the university elicit the cooperation of all its stakeholders to ensure the overall
development of its students?
Every member of CMI is committed to the overall development of its students.
December, 2015 78
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
5.1.20. How does the university ensure the participation of women students in intra- and inter-
institutional sports competitions and cultural activities? Provide details of sports and
cultural activities where such efforts were made.
Not considered necessary at this time.
5.2.3. What is the number and percentage of students who appeared/ qualified in examinations
like UGC-CSIR-NET, UGC-NET, SLET, ATE / CAT / GRE / TOFEL / GMAT / Central
/ State services, Defense, Civil Services, etc.?
Around 250 students (90%) appeared since 2006.
5.2.4. Provide category-wise details regarding the number of Ph.D./ D.Litt./D.Sc. theses sub-
mitted/ accepted/ resubmitted/ rejected in the last four years.
PhD accepted in Mathematics: 2
PhD accepted in Computer Science: 6
5.3.2. Give details of the achievements of students in co- curricular, extracurricular and cultural
activities at different levels: University / State / Zonal / National / International, etc.
during the last four years.
CMI students organize an annual inter-collegiate festival called Fiesta. CMI students
take part in inter-collegiate festivals organized by other colleges in the region. CMI
students regularly take part in the ACM Inter-Collegiate Programming Contest (ICPC).
December, 2015 79
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
5.3.3. Does the university conduct special drives / campaigns for students to promote heritage
consciousness?
Not considered necessary at this time.
5.3.4. How does the university involve and encourage its students to publish materials like
catalogues, wall magazines, college magazine, and other material? List the major publi-
cations/ materials brought out by the students during the last four academic sessions.
In some years, students have brought out an online magazine but this has not been a
regular activity. There is a proposal to revive this activity under the guidance of an
external faculty member who teaches English.
5.3.5. Does the university have a Student Council or any other similar body? Give details on
its constitution, activities and funding.
Students have various committees such as hostel committee, sports committee, cultural
committee. Students elect these committees themselves. These committees bring stu-
dent issues to the faculty, organise sports and cultural events.
5.3.6. Give details of various academic and administrative bodies that have student representa-
tives on them. Also provide details of their activities.
Students have their own Hostel Committee that interacts with the Institute’s Hostel Com-
mittee to oversee matters pertaining to the hostel. Students do not have any representa-
tives on any formal academic bodies.
Any other information regarding Student Support and Progression which the
university would like to include.
6.1.2. Does the mission statement define the institution’s distinctive characteristics in terms
of addressing the needs of the society, the students it seeks to serve, the institution’s
tradition and value orientations, its vision for the future, etc.?
Yes.
December, 2015 80
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
6.1.4. Were any of the top leadership positions of the university vacant for more than a year?
If so, state the reasons.
No
6.1.5. Does the university ensure that all positions in its various statutory bodies are filled and
meetings conducted regularly?
Yes
6.1.6. Does the university promote a culture of participative management? If yes, indicate the
levels of participative management.
Yes, CMI promotes the culture of participative management. There is very lean admin-
istrative staff and most faculty members are invoved in running of the institute through
committees.
6.1.7. Give details of the academic and administrative leadership provided by the university
to its affiliated colleges and the support and encouragement given to them to become
autonomous.
Not applicable.
6.1.8. Have any provisions been incorporated / introduced in the University Act and Statutes
to provide for conferment of degrees by autonomous colleges?
Not applicable.
6.1.9. How does the university groom leadership at various levels? Give details.
The correct faculty member is identified for each task, and is either given full freedom,
or encouraged to work in a team. Faculty members gain experience from these activities.
6.1.10. Has the university evolved a knowledge management strategy? If yes, give details.
No
6.1.11. How are the following values reflected the functioning of the university?
December, 2015 81
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
December, 2015 82
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
• Internationalisation
All CMI faculty have strong academic ties with leading scientists around the world.
The Institute has participated in a number of bilateral international collaborative
research projects. Each year, the Institute hosts a number of international visitors
who deliver seminars and engage in collaborative research with CMI faculty. The
Institute also regularly organizes seminars and symposia in which leading experts
from around the world participate.
CMI welcomes international students nominated by external organizations such
as ICTP, Trieste or through programmes such as the European Union ALGANT
programme.
6.2.2. Describe the university’s internal organizational structure and decision making processes
and their effectiveness.
The Director of CMI is both the academic and administrative head of the institute. He
is assisted in academic matters by the Dean of Studies and in administrative matters by
the Registrar. The Governing Council and the Board of Trustees oversee and facilitate
the administrative issues, while the Academic Council and the Boards of Studies ensure
smooth functioning of the academic matters.
6.2.3. Does the university have a formal policy to ensure quality? How is it designed, driven,
deployed and reviewed?
CMI maintains very high academic standards for faculty hiring and promotion, as well
as selection of students. This combination naturally ensures academic quality.
6.2.4. Does the university encourage its academic departments to function independently and
autonomously and how does it ensure accountability?
Faculty members in all areas are encouraged to function independently and enjoy full
academic autonomy.
6.2.5. During the last four years, have there been any instances of court cases filed by and
against the institute? What were the critical issues and verdicts of the courts on these
issues?
No. There were no court cases involving the institute.
6.2.6. How does the university ensure that grievances / complaints are promptly attended to
and resolved effectively? Is there a mechanism to analyse the nature of grievances for
promoting better stakeholder relationship?
Given the small size, a mechanism to analyse the nature of grievances is not considered
necessary at this stage. As and when issues come up, they are addressed immediately
by he Director, Dean and senior colleagues. There have been no serious complaints or
grievances.
6.2.7. Does the university have a mechanism for analyzing student feedback on institutional
performance? If yes, what was the institutional response?
No
6.2.8. Does the university conduct performance audit of the various departments?
Not considered necessary at this stage.
December, 2015 83
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
6.2.9. What mechanisms have been evolved by the university to identify the developmental
needs of its affiliated institutions?
Not applicable.
6.2.10. Does the university have a vibrant College Development Council (CDC) / Board of
College and University Development (BCUD)? If yes, detail its structure, functions and
achievements.
The Board of Trustees and the Governing Conucil jointly oversee planning and devel-
opment of the Institute and as such serve as (CDC/BCUD).
6.3.2. What is the outcome of the review of various appraisal methods used by the university?
List the important decisions.
Given its size, such an exercise has not been taken up. All faculty members file annual
progress reports. Individual performance reviews take place when promotions are taken
up.
6.3.3. What are the welfare schemes available for teaching and non- teaching staff? What
percentage of staff have benefitted from these schemes in the last four years? Give
details.
We follow standard central government norms with respect to welfare schemes. In addi-
tion, CMI has put in place a group medical insurance scheme for its employees and their
families. 100% of staff have benefited from these scheme.
6.3.4. What are the measures taken by the University for attracting and retaining eminent fac-
ulty?
One of the main attractions of CMI is its vibrant research programme, with visits of
leading researchers and support for faculty to attend conferences with minimal paper-
work. This attracts high-quality faculty and also helps us retain them. We have been
able to attract a steady stream of distinguished visitors and good set of young applicants.
Thanks to a grant from Infosys Foundation, CMI is able to provide generous fellowships
and grants for travel to faculty members to make their benefits comparable to those in
IITs, IISc etc.
6.3.5. Has the university conducted a gender audit during the last four years? If yes, mention
a few salient findings.
No
6.3.6. Does the university conduct any gender sensitization programmes for its faculty?
Not considered necessary
December, 2015 84
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
6.3.7. What is the impact of the University’s Academic Staff College Programmes in enhancing
the competencies of the university faculty?
Not applicable
December, 2015 85
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
6.5.3. Is there a central body within the university to continuously review the teaching learning
process? Give details of its structure, methodologies of operations and outcome?
The Director and Dean of Studies interact with faculty advisors (there is a separate
faculty advisor for each batch) to review the teaching and learning process.
6.5.4. How has IQAC contributed to institutionalizing quality assurance strategies and pro-
cesses?
Not applicable
6.5.5. How many decisions of the IQAC have been placed before the statutory authorities of
the university for implementation?
Not applicable
6.5.6. Does the IQAC have external members on its committees? If so, mention any significant
contribution made by such members.
Not applicable
6.5.7. Has the IQAC conducted any study on the incremental academic growth of students
from disadvantaged sections of society?
No
6.5.8. What policies are in place for the periodic review of administrative and academic de-
partments, subject areas, research centres, etc.?
Not considered at this stage.
2. Shri Arun Duggal, Former Chairman, Shriram Capital Ltd, New Delhi,
6. Prof. M.S. Raghunathan, F.R.S.,Director, National Centre for Mathematics, IIT Bombay,
Mumbai,
December, 2015 86
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
7.1.2. What are the initiatives taken by the university to make the campus eco-friendly?
• Energy conservation
Solar heater is used in the hostel complex for hot water.
• Use of renewable energy
CMI is too small for such measures becoming effective.
• Water harvesting
CMI harvests rain water.
• Check dam construction
Not applicable, given the size and nature of the campus.
• Efforts for Carbon neutrality
CMI has a mechanism for use of biogas.
• Plantation
The campus is extensively covered by plants and trees. Several gardeners attend to
the maintenance of the gardens.
• Hazardous waste management
CMI does not generate any hazardous waste.
• e-waste management
All e-waste is disposed of in a responsible manner.
• any other (please specify)
CMI has a sewage treatment plant. The treated water is used for watering trees.
December, 2015 87
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
7.2 Innovations
Give details of innovations introduced during the last four years which have created a positive
impact on the functioning of the university.
1. Active use of teaching assistants to conduct problem solving sessions and guide students
with difficulties in specific topics.
2. Use of internet enabled National Knowledge Network classroom to share seminars and lec-
tures with other institutions.
3. Installation of RFID tags and automated kiosk in the library for smooth check-in, checkout
of books and effective inventory management.
December, 2015 88
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
• B.Sc. (Hons) in Mathematics and Computer Science, with Computer Science depar-
ment
• B.Sc (Hons) in Mathematics and Physics, with Physics department
December, 2015 89
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
11. Faculty profile with name, qualification, designation, area of specialization, experience and
research under guidance
December, 2015 90
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
No. of
Ph.D/
No. of M.Phil
Qualifi- Years students
Name Designation Specialization
-cation of Expe- guided
rience for the
last 4
years
Probability
Rajeeva L. Professor, Theory,
Ph.D. 34 0
Karandikar Director Stochastic
Processes
Professor,
Director- Algebraic
C.S. Seshadri Ph.D. 57 0
Emeritus Geometry
Algebraic
V. Balaji Ph.D. Professor 24 3
Geometry
Associate Commutative
Clare D’Cruz Ph.D. 17 0
Professor Algebra
Assistant Financial
Sourish Das Ph.D. 7 0
Professor Mathematics
Priyavrat Assistant Algebraic
Ph.D. 4 0
Deshpande Professor Topology
Krishna Assistant Algebraic
Ph.D. 7 0
Hanumanthu Professor Geometry
Representation
S.
Theory,
Senthamarai Ph.D. Professor 14 2
Algebraic
Kannan
Geometry
Upendra Associate Representation
Ph.D. 16 2
Kulkarni Professor Theory
Manoj Associate Commutative
Ph.D. 7 0
Kummini Professor Algebra
Sukhendu Assistant Algebraic
Ph.D. 10 0
Mehrotra Professor Geometry
Contact and
Dishant Associate
Ph.D. Symplectic 8 0
Pancholi Professor
Topology
Differential
T.R. Ramadas Ph.D. Professor and Algebraic 33 0
Geometry
Purusottam Associate Number
Ph.D. 9 0
Rath Professor Theory
Pramathanath Algebraic
Ph.D. Professor 25 0
Sastry Geometry
December, 2015 91
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
No. of
Ph.D/
No. of M.Phil
Qualifi- Years students
Name Designation Specialization
-cation of Expe- guided
rience for the
last 4
years
Partial
Differential
Shiva Shankar Equations,
Ph.D. Professor 32 0
Mechanics,
Control
Theory
Operator
Associate Algebras,
R. Srinivasan Ph.D. 17 1
Professor Operator
Theory
Assistant Operator
S. Sundar Ph.D. 5 0
Professor Algebras
Representati
on Theory of
Associate
M. Sundari Ph.D. Lie Groups, 17 0
Professor
Harmonic
Analysis
• Seshadri Chintapalli
• Krishanu Dan
• Dhriti Ranjan Dolai
• Ananya Lahiri
• Sauvik Mukherjee
• Debajyoti Nandi
• Vijay Ravikumar
• Pranab Sardar
• Sachin Sharma
• Kavita Sutar
• Sushmita Venugopalan
Adjunct Faculty
• S Kesavan
• V Lakshmibai
December, 2015 92
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
• T Parthasarathy
• S Ramanan
• B V Rao
• R Sridharan
• V Swaminathan
15. Number of academic support staff (technical) and administrative staff: sanctioned, filled and
actual
Academic/administrative support staff: 5 (shared across all departments)
17. Number of faculty with ongoing projects from a) national b) international funding agencies
and c) Total grants received. Give the names of the funding agencies, project title and grants
received project-wise.
a) National collaboration
December, 2015 93
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
b) International collaboration
CMI is a partner in the Indo-US Virtual Institute for Mathematical and Statistical Sci-
ences (VI-MSS) jointly funded by the National Science Foundation, USA and the De-
partment of Science and Technology, India.
CMI is a partner in a joint collaboration with Centre for Quantum Geometry of Mod-
uli Spaces, Aarhus University, Denmark and Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
Mumbai.
19. Departmental projects funded by DST-FIST; UGC-SAP/CAS, DPE; DBT, ICSSR, AICTE,
etc.; total grants received.
• state recognition
• national recognition
• international recognition
CMI is a partner in the Indo-US Virtual Institute for Mathematical and Statistical Sci-
ences (VI-MSS) jointly funded by the National Science Foundation, USA and the De-
partment of Science and Technology, India.
CMI is a partner in a joint collaboration with Centre for Quantum Geometry of Mod-
uli Spaces, Aarhus University, Denmark and Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
Mumbai.
22. Publications:
December, 2015 94
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
• SJR
• Impact Factor - range / average
• h-index
In the areas of Mathematics that are represented at CMI, numeric indicators such as
impact factor and h-index are not meaningful. CMI faculty publish their research in
international journals and conferences that are recognized by the academic community
as the leading publication outlets in the corresponding areas.
1. Area: Cryptography
Partner: WESEE (Indian Navy)
Faculty Member: Rajeeva L. Karandikar
Amount Received: Rs. 10,00,000
2. Area: Predictive Modelling
Partner: Cognizant Ltd
Faculty Member: Sourish Das
Amount Received: Rs. 6,00,000
25. Faculty selected nationally / internationally to visit other laboratories / institutions / indus-
tries in India and abroad
Rajeeva L. Karandikar
December, 2015 95
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
11. Gave a 6-hour tutorial on Stochastic Calculus at ICTS School in Math Finance, TIFR
Mumbai.
12. Visited Stanford University for Young Researchers Meet (Mathematics and Computer
Science) during May 26-27, 2012. Also gave a talk on “Opinion Polls in the context of
Indian Parliamentary Democracy”.
13. Visited University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, June 2012.
14. Talked on “Introduction to Cryptography” at a conference for college teachers and stu-
dents organised by IIT Bombay, Mumbai, January 2013.
15. Talked on “Modeling in the Spirit of Markowitz Portfolio Theory in a Non Gaussian
World” at IIM, Indore.
16. Gave invited talks on “Opinion Polls in the context of Indian Parliamentary Democracy”
at
• IIT, Indore,
• At the Bayes by the Bay conference organised by Institute of Mathematical Sciences,
January 2013.
• At the annual conference of International Indian Statistical Association at Chennai
January 2013.
• . At national seminar at St. Xavier’s College, Kolkata, January 2013.
17. Invited talk on “Limit Theorems in Finitely Additive Probability Theory” at the confer-
ence on ”Limit theorems in probability” at IISc, January 2013.
18. Gave invited talks on Opinion Polls in the context of Indian Parliamentary Democracy at
IISER, Pune in September 2013.
19. Visited Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi, in December 2013.
20. Gave an invited talk at National Meet of Research Students in Mathematical Sciences,
University of Pune on “Introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation” in February 2014.
21. Gave invited talks on Opinion Polls in the context of Indian Parliamentary Democracy at
University of Pune as part of Science day celebrations (2014).
22. Gave invited talks on Opinion Polls in the context of Indian Parliamentary Democracy at
IIT, Kanpur, in March 2014.
23. Gave invited talk at a discussion meeting on “Nonlinear Filtering and Data Assimilation”,
at ICTS, Bangalore on “ Introduction to Nonlinear Filtering”.
24. Gave an invited talk at the Indo French Technology summit, New Delhi, on “Economic
Benefits of Mathematical Science Research?.
25. Delivered a invited public lecture at Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi on
“Interface of Mathematics with Society”, under Science & Society Public Engagement
Programme in April 2014.
26. Delivered a popular talk on “Power and Limitations of Opinion Polls” at Indian Associ-
ation Of Investment Professionals, CFA society, India Chapter in April 2014.
27. Gave a special invited lecture at the Annual Meeting of Indian Academy of Sciences in
November 2014 on “Power and Limitation of opinion polls”.
28. Visited Indian Institute of Science Education and Research and gave seminar titled “On
Differential equations and Diffusion Processes” and “Power and Limitation of opinion
polls”
December, 2015 96
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
29. Visited Indian Institute of Technology, Indore and gave a colloquium talk on “Introduc-
tion to Monte Carlo Simulation”.
30. Gave an invited talk at National Seminar in Statistics at Presidency College, Kolkata, in
February 2015 on “Introduction to Option Pricing”.
31. Gave an invited talk at IISER (Indian Institute of Science Education and Research),
Kolkata in February 2015 on “Power and Limitations of Opinion Polls”.
32. Gave an invited talk at Ramanujam Symposium at C R Rao Institute, Hyderabad, in
March 2015 on “Introduction to Martinagles”.
C.S. Seshadri
V. Balaji
1. Gave invited talk in Madrid in September 2012 in the Indo-Spanish Conference in honour
of Professor M.S. Narasimhan’s 80th birthday.
2. Gave a Course of Lectures in the “Geometry of Principal bundles” in University of Milan
in September 2012.
3. Gave invited talk in University of Roma I on “Higher dimensional analogues of Narasimhan-
Seshadri theorem” in September 2012.
4. Gave three invited talks in University of Paris 7 and Paris 8 on
(i) Higher dimensional analogues of Narasimhan-Seshadri theorem
(ii) Parahoric torsors on algebraic curves
(iii) Tensor product theorems of semistable bundles and Hitchin pairs.
5. Gave invited talk in the International Conference in the Indian Institute of Science in
honour of Professor M.S. Narasimhan.
6. Invited to give a Master’s Class Course at the QGM Center in Aarhus University.
7. Invited to the ICM Satellite Conference in Singapore on “Higgs Bundles” to give a talk.
8. Conducted AIS in Algebraic Geometry in the Kerala School of Mathematics in December
2014 (along with D.S. Nagaraj) and gave a series of 5 talks in the Workshop.
Clare D’Cruz
December, 2015 97
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
Sourish Das
1. Taught “Linear Models” at ISI Chennai in Fall 2013 semester (September - December
2013).
2. Gave a talk on “Some Perspective on Efficient Market Hypothesis and Multiple Testing
Problem” at ISI-Chennai, in January 2014.
3. Gave a talk on “Bayesian Solution to Some Ill-Posed Problems”, at CMI.
4. Presented at the Statistics Department of National University of Singapore titled “Some
Perspective on Efficient Market Hypothesis and Multiple Testing Problem” in May 2014.
5. Gave a course on “Linear Models” at ISI Chennai Center during April - September 2014.
6. Presented at SSN Institute titled “Statistical Data Analysis using R” in September 2014.
7. Taught a course on “Linear Models” at ISI, Chennai Center.
8. Presented at the International Conference on Applied Statistics at Colombo, SriLanka
titled “Efficient Algorithms for Gaussian Process for Big Data” in December 2014.
9. Presented Poster at the Indo-Russian Conference on Probability and Statistics, at ISI,
Delhi on “Efficient Algorithms for Gaussian Process for Big Data” in January 2015.
10. Presented Tutorial at National Conference on Distributed Machine Learning on “System-
atic Approach towards Research on Machine Learning and Distributed Computing”.
Krishna Hanumanthu
December, 2015 98
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
S.Senthamarai Kannan.
1. Gave a talk in RMS held at the University of Allahabd during October 2011.
2. Gave a talk in the Vaidhyanadha Samy Memorail lecture at Ramanujan Institute for Ada-
vanced Study in Mathematics, Chennai.
3. Attended the Groups and Geometry Conference at ISI, Bangalore in December, 2012.
4. Attended the Algebraic Geometry Conference at KSOM, Kozhikode in March, 2013.
5. Attended Vector Bundles conference at KSOM during March 2014.
Upendra Kulkarni
1. Gave five lectures in Advanced Instructional School on “Lie Algebras” at CMI, in July
2011
2. Visited IIT Mumbai, and gsave two lectures on “Schur-Weyl duality and representation
theory of GL(n)”, in November 2011.
3. Attended ATM Workshop in Representation theory of finite group of Lie-type: Deligne-
Lusztig theory at TIFR, Mumbai, in December 2011.
4. Gave lectures on representations of Chevalley groups in the ATM school on Chevalley
Groups, in May 2013 at IISER Pune.
5. Attended Workshop on Cohomological Finite Generation by Wilberd van der Kallen
during June - July 2013 at IMSc., Chennai.
6. Attended Workshop on Sheaves on affine flag manifolds, combinatorics of Bruhat graphs
and modular representations of algebraic groups by Professor Peter Fiebig in October
2013 at IMSc., Chennai.
7. Gave lectures on Clifford algebras in AIS on Classical Groups and Introduction to K-
theory, in December 2013 at IISER, Pune.
8. Attended Workshop on Soergel bimodules and Kazhdan-Lustig theory by Ben Elias dur-
ing January - February 2014 at IMSc., Chennai
Manoj Kummini
December, 2015 99
NAAC Self Study Report Chennai Mathematical Institute
8. Gave a talk on “Poset embeddings of Hilbert functions” at City University of New York,
New York, NY in October, 2012.
9. Gave a talk on Local Boij-Söderberg theory, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Oc-
tober 2012.
10. Lectured in the preparatory workshop for Panaroma Lectures on “Syzygies and Free
Resolutions” by David Eisenbud in CMI in December, 2012.
11. Lectured in the ATM workshop on Singularity Categories in Algebra and Geometry in
IIT Madras in Januar, 2013.
12. Visited IMSc, Chennai, in July 2013.
13. Gave an invited talk at Hanoi, Vietnam, in December 2013.
14. Attended KSOM at Kozhikode, in February 2014.
15. Gave a talk at International Conference on Algebra and Applications, Aligarh Muslim
University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.
16. Instructor at Advance Instructional School on ‘Schemes and Cohomology’, Kerala School
of Mathematics, Kozhikode, Kerala.
17. Instructor at Annual Foundational School, IIT-Madras, Chennai, Tamilnadu.
18. Gave a talk on “A geometric technique of constructing interesting complexes” at the
Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore, in February 2015.
19. Gave a talk on “Free resolutions of some determinantal-line varieties” at CAAG 2015
Conference held at IIT-Guwahati, Guwahati, in February 2015.
20. Gave a talk on “Betti tables of p-Borel-fixed ideals” at the Indian Statistical Institute,
Kolkata, in February 2015.
Sukhendu Mehrotra
1. Attended the workshop on “Brauer groups and obstruction problems” at the American
Institute of Mathematics, Palo Alto from February 25 to March 1, 2013.
2. Visited the National University of Singapore from November 6–11, 2012. Gave a talk on
“Hyperholomorphic sheaves and deformations of K3 surfaces” in the Geometry Seminar
on November 9, 2012.
3. Lectured in Module 2, Geometry and Topology in the Ninth AFS at CMI in December,
2012.
4. Lectured in the ATM Workshop on Singularity Categories in Algebraic Geometry and
Commutative Algebra at IIT Madras, January 2–12, 2013.
5. Visited TIFR, Mumbai from January 27 to February 1, 2013. Gave a Colloquium on
“Hyperholomorphic sheaves and deformations of K3 surfaces” on January 31, 2013.
6. Gave invited workshop lecture at National University of Singapore, Singapore in July
2014 on “Noncommutative K3 surfaces and moduli spaces of sheaves”.
7. Gave a course on “Representation theory of finite groups” at Universidad Católica de
Chile.
8. Taught a course on “Representation theory of finite groups” at the Catholic University of
Chile (PUC, Santiago).
9. Gave a talk entitled “Non commutative K3 surfaces and moduli spaces of sheaves” at the
LXXXIII Annual Meeting of the l Sociedad de Matemática de Chile in December 2014.
10. Year-long academic visit to Catholic University of Chile (PUC, Santiago).
11. Gave multiple talks in a seminar on derived categories at the Department of Mathematics,
PUC.
Dishant Pancholi
1. Visited the International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Tireste, Italy from 7–14
January, 2013.
T.R. Ramadas
Purusottam Rath
Pramathanath Sastry
Shiva Shankar
R. Srinivasan
S. Sundar
(a) Visited Université d’Orleans, France from September 23 to October 18, 2012.
(b) Visited Prof. Renault at University of Orleans for a month during September October
2013 to collaborate. The collaboration ended in a research article titled “Groupoids
associated to Ore semigroup actions” which is accepted by J. Operator theory.
(c) Attended the workshop held in Kerala School of Mathematics in February 2014 on the
occasion of 70th birthday of Prof. Kalyan B. Sinha.
(d) Attended a conference at Oberwolfach, Germany during the period October 2014.
M. Sundari
26. Faculty serving in (a) National committees, (b) International committees, (c) Editorial Boards,
(d) any other (please specify)
Rajeeva Karandikar:
1. Currently editor of Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (by INSA).
2. In the past have served as the editor of Sankhya (Journal of indian Statistical Institute)
3. As associate editor/editorial board member for Annals of Probability
4. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
5. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry.
C. S. Seshadri:
V. Balaji:
Shiva Shankar:
Senthamarai Kannan:
1. On the editorial board for “International Journal of Mathematics and Scientific Comput-
ing”. ISSN: 2231 5330.
T. R. Ramadas:
27. Faculty recharging strategies (UGC, ASC, Refresher / orientation programs, workshops,
training programs and similar programs).
Not Considered Necessary.
• Faculty
1. T.R. Ramadas was awarded J.C. Bose National Fellowship by the Department of
Science and Technology in 2015.
2. Rajeeva L. Karandikar was awarded the P C Mahalanobis Gold Medal by the
Prime Minister at the Indian Natioanal Science Congress in February 2014.
3. C.S. Seshadri was awarded Doctoate Honoris Causa by Univ Paris et Marie Curie,
Paris, France in 2013
4. C.S. Seshadri was elected the Fellow of the American Mathematical Society,
U.S.A. In 2013.
5. C.S. Seshadri was awarded the degree of Doctor of Science (Honoris Causa) by
the University of Hyderabad in 2012.
6. Purusottam Rath was awarded ICTP Regular Associateship until December 2016.
7. C.S. Seshadri was elected to the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A in April
2010.
8. V. Balaji was awarded J.C. Bose National Fellowship by the Department of Sci-
ence and Technology in December 2008.
9. C. S. Seshadri was awarded H.K. Firodia Award for Excellence in Science and
Technology, Pune, in October 2008.
10. C.S. Seshadri was awarded Padma Bhushan by the President of India in January
2009.
11. S. Kesavan was elected as a Fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences.
12. V. Balaji was elected as a Fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences.
13. V. Balaji was awarded the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize in Mathematics for the
year 2006.
14. C.S. Seshadri was awarded the Trieste Science Prize for the year 2006.
15. C.S. Seshadri was appointed as National Research Professor by the Government
of india.
• Doctoral / post doctoral fellows
• Students
30. Seminars/ Conferences/Workshops organized and the source of funding (national / interna-
tional) with details of outstanding participants, if any.
11. Ninth AFS-1, NBHM Advanced Training in Mathematics School, December 3-29, 2012.
Funded by National Board for Higher Mathematics (NBHM).
12. CMI-IMSc Mathematics Colloquium 2012, January 23-27, 2012.
Jointly organied with Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai.
13. NBHM Advanced Instructional School on Invariant Theory, December 12-30, 2011.
Funded by National Board for Higher Mathematics (NBHM).
14. NBHM Advanced Instructional School on Lie Algebras, July 4-23, 2011.
Funded by National Board for Higher Mathematics (NBHM).
15. Sixth AFS-1, NBHM Advanced Training in Mathematics School, December 3-30, 2009.
Funded by National Board for Higher Mathematics (NBHM).
16. Principal Bundles in Geometry, February-March, 2009.
Funded by the CMI-TCS Academic Alliance.
17. Galois Representations and Modular Forms, September-October, 2007.
Funded by the Centre for Theoretical Studies, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
34. How many students have cleared Civil Services and Defense Services examinations, NET,
SET, GATE and other competitive examinations? Give details category-wise.
None.
a) Library
CMI Library has an extensive collection of mathematics books.
b) Internet facilities for staff and students
CMI campus has 24 hours high-speed (32 Mbps) internet connection.
c) Total number of class rooms
12 (Shared by all departments)
d) Class rooms with ICT facility
All classrooms are equipped with projector and internet facility.
e) Students’ laboratories
No.
f) Research laboratories
No.
• Sarjick Bakshi
b) from other institutions/universities
Doctoral students:
• Anbu Arjunan
• Suratno Basu
• Abhishek T Bharadwaj
• Narasimha Chary B
• Debayudh Das
• Sourav Das
• Abhijeet Ghanwat
• Mitra Koley
• Naveen Kumar
• Subramani Muthukrishnan
• S P Murugan Paramasivam
• Praveen Kumar Roy
• Kuldeep Saha
• Pinakinath Saha
• Rajib Sarkar
• Shraddha Srivastava
Post Doctoral students:
• Seshadri Chintapalli
• Krishanu Dan
• Dhriti Ranjan Dolai
• Ananya Lahiri
• Sauvik Mukherjee
• Debajyoti Nandi
• Vijay Ravikumar
• Pranab Sardar
• Sachin Sharma
• Kavita Sutar
• Sushmita Venugopalan
40. Number of post graduate students getting financial assistance from the university.
Fifty.
41. Was any need assessment exercise undertaken before the development of new programme(s)?
If so, highlight the methodology.
No.
44. Give details of student enrichment programmes (special lectures / workshops / seminar)
involving external experts.
Students participate in all the academic activities, such as seminars and workshops.
45. List the teaching methods adopted by the faculty for different programmes.
Each faculty member has complete academic freedom in the teaching methods he or she
adopts and varies from person to person and time to time. General methods include close
personal monitoring, continuous assessment through assignments, and exams; and term pa-
pers and presentations.
46. How does the department ensure that programme objectives are constantly met and learning
outcomes are monitored?
The Board of Studies and Academic Council of the institute meet periodically to ensure
that the programme objectives are met. Each PhD student has a doctoral committee which
monitors his/her progress.
49. State whether the programme/ department is accredited/ graded by other agencies? If yes,
give details.
No.
50. Briefly highlight the contributions of the department in generating new knowledge, basic or
applied.
CMI is a major center for algebraic geometry, with Prof. C.S. Seshadri, the Founder-
Director of CMI being a leading expert in this area. He along with his collaborators have
made substantial contributions to the theory of moduli of bundles, Free resolutions of some
Schubert singularities. Dishant Pancholi (with Roger Casals and Francisco Presas) has com-
pleted a major piece of work, to appear in Annals of Mathematics. In this paper, the exis-
tence of a contact structure is proved in any homotopy class of almost contact structures on
a closed 5-dimensional manifold.
Other areas of significant work at CMI in mathematics include symplectic topology, algebro-
geometric foundations of conformal field theory, diagram categories and their representa-
tions, Hoskin-Deligne formula for the length of complete ideals of height two in a two-
dimensional regular local ring, transcendental number theory, Euclidean Ramsey theory,
controllability of a Kalman state space system, theory of E0-semigroups, Ore semigroup,
quadratic variation of martingales and stochastic calculus. These contributions have resulted
in publications in high quality journals.
CMI has a vigorous programme on the history of mathematics, with Professor Kim Plofker
visiting CMI every year and leading this activity.
51. Detail five major Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) of the de-
partment.
Computer Science
1. Name of the Department
Computer Science
2. Year of establishment
2006
4. Names of programmes offered (UG, PG, M.Phil., Ph.D., Integrated Masters; Integrated
Ph.D., D.Sc., D.Litt., etc.)
10. Number of teaching posts sanctioned, filled and actual (Professors/Associate Professors/Asst
Professors/others)
Sanctioned Filled Actual (including CAS & MPS)
Professor – 4 4
Associate Professor – 3 3
Assistant Professor – 5 5
Others – – –
11. Faculty profile with name, qualification, designation, area of specialization, experience and
research under guidance
No. of
Ph.D/
No. of M.Phil
Qualifi- Years students
Name Designation Specialization
-cation of Expe- guided
rience for the
last 4
years
Formal
Professor,
Madhavan verification,
Ph.D. Dean of 23 2
Mukund Concurrency
Studies
theory
Automata
Theory,
Aiswarya Assistant
Ph.D. Verification, 2 0
Cyriac Professor Logic,
Concurrency
Complexity
Sourav Associate
Ph.D. theory, 7 3
Chakraborty Professor
Algorithms
Complexity
Samir Datta Ph.D. Professor theory, Graph 11 2
algorithms
Partha Complexity
Mukhopad- Associate theory,
Ph.D. 6 1
hyay Professor Additive
combinatorics
Complexity
Prajakta Assistant
Ph.D. theory, 5 0
Nimbhorkar Professor
Algorithms
No. of
Ph.D/
No. of M.Phil
Qualifi- Years students
Name Designation Specialization
-cation of Expe- guided
rience for the
last 4
years
Distributed
K. Narayan automata,
Ph.D. Professor 20 2
Kumar verification,
logic
Paramterized
Geeverghese Assistant
Ph.D. Algorithms 4 0
Philip Professor
Complexity
Concurrency,
Infinite state
Assistant systems,
M. Praveen Ph.D. 3 0
Professor Logic and
parametrized
complexity
Formal
verification,
Assistant
B. Srivathsan Ph.D. Formal 3 0
Professor
language
theory
Algorithms
and
Complexity,
Algebraic
K.V. Subrah-
Methods and
manyam Ph.D. p Professor 3 0
Algebraic
Complexity,
Polyhedral
Combinatorics
Logic in
computer
science,
Concurrency
Associate
S.P. Suresh Ph.D. p and 12 3
Professor
distributed
computing,
Reasoning
about security
• Manindra Agrawal
• Ramesh Hariharan
• Neeraj Kayal
• Raghav Kulkarni
• Rani Siromoney
• Mandayam Srivas
• V. Vinay
15. Number of academic support staff (technical) and administrative staff: sanctioned, filled and
actual
Academic/administrative support staff: 5 (shared across all departments)
17. Number of faculty with ongoing projects from a) national b) international funding agencies
and c) Total grants received. Give the names of the funding agencies, project title and grants
received project-wise.
a) National collaboration
b) International collaboration
i. CMI is a partner in an International Associated Laboratory (LIA) on Formal Meth-
ods set up by the French National Centre for Research in Science (CNRS).
ii. Indo-Swedish Research Project on “Verification of Concurrent Software” with Up-
psala University, Sweden.
iii. Indo-French Research Project on “Automated Verification of Concurrent Software”
with University of Paris 7, France.
19. Departmental projects funded by DST-FIST; UGC-SAP/CAS, DPE; DBT, ICSSR, AICTE,
etc.; total grants received.
None
• state recognition
• national recognition
• international recognition
CMI is a partner in an International Associated Laboratory (LIA) on Formal Methods
set up by the French National Centre for Research in Science (CNRS).
CMI has an Indo-Swedish Research Project on “Verification of Concurrent Software”
with Uppsala University, Sweden.
22. Publications:
25. Faculty selected nationally / internationally to visit other laboratories / institutions / indus-
tries in India and abroad
Madhavan Mukund
1. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan, France and IRISA, Rennes, France in April-May 2010
2. Attended ICALP 2010 at Bordeaux, France, in July 2010.
3. Attended 9th Update Meeting on Advanced Formal Methods, at DA-IICT, Gandhinagar,
in July 2010 and presented a talk on “Verification of weak memory models”
4. Gave a talk on “Who’s afraid of concurrent programming?” in ACM, Chennai Profes-
sional Chapter at IMSc., in November 2010.
5. Attended 76th annual conference of the Indian Mathematical Society at NIT, Surat, in
December 2010 and presented an invited talk on “The Interplay between Automata The-
ory and Mathematical Logic”.
6. Attended RMIT Symposium on Mathematics and Information Technology at NIT, Surat,
in December 2010 and presented an invited talk on “Formal Verification”.
7. Co-organizer of Workshop on Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems III, at the
Chennai Mathematical Institute, in January 2011.
8. Co-organizer of Mysore Park Workshop on “The Chemistry of Concurrent and Dis-
tributed Programming”, at Mysore, during February 2011.
9. Attended Fourth Indo-American Frontiers of Science Symposium (IAFOS) 2011, Irvine,
U.S.A., in April 2011. Member of Organizing Committee.
10. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan, France, LaBRI, Bordeaux, France and IRISA, Rennes,
France in April-May 2011 and gave a talk on “Assembling Sessions” at LSV, ENS de
Cachan
11. Attended 10th Update Meeting on Advanced Formal Methods, at VIT University, Vel-
lore, July 2011 and gave a talk on “The decidability frontier for Petri nets”, 10th Update
Meeting on Advanced Formal Methods, VIT University, Vellore, July 12-14, 2011.
12. Organized ACM Chennai Faculty Workshop on Formal Methods for Specification and
Verification, CMI, July 2011 and gave a talk on “Adding time to automata”.
13. Participated in ACM Education Council meeting, at Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. in Septem-
ber 2011.
14. Visited Tata Research Development and Design Centre (TRDDC), Pune in September
2011.
15. Attended ATVA 2011, at Taipei, Taiwan, October 2011 and presented a talk.
16. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan, France, LaBRI, Bordeaux, France and IRISA, Rennes,
France in November 2011.
17. Attended FSTTCS 2011, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, in December 2011 and chaired a session.
18. Attended Mysore Park Workshop on “The Future of Debugging”, Mysore, during February-
March 2012.
19. Visited LaBRI, Bordeaux, France, LSV, ENS de Cachan, France, and IRISA, Rennes,
France in May-June 2012. Presented a talk entitled “Tagging Makes Local Testing of
Message-Passing Systems Feasible” at LaBRI, Bordeaux, France.
20. Gave a talk on “Statistical Model Checking” at the 11th Update Meeting on Advanced
Formal Methods, CMI, July 1921, 2012.
21. Gave a talk on “Timed Automata”, as part of the Golden Jubilee Thematic Lectures on
“Automata for the Real World”, IMSc, July 21, 2012.
22. Gave a talk on “Automata and Program Verification”, SSN College of Engineering,
September 12, 2012
23. Was Chair of the Programme Committee for 10th International Symposium on Auto-
mated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2012), Thiruvananthapuram, In-
dia, October 3-6, 2012.
24. Gave a talk on “Software Model Checking” at the Alan Turing Centenary Year Workshop
on Advanced Topics in Theoretical Computer Science, Anna University, November 1618,
2012.
25. Attended 32nd conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Com-
puter Science (FSTTCS 2012) at IIIT Hyderabad, in December 2012. Was a member of
the Programme Committee and chaired a session.
26. Visited Tata Research Development and Design Centre (TRDDC), Pune in December,
2012.
27. Co-organizer of the ACM India Annual Event, IIT Madras, January 2013. l Attended the
MSR-ACM India Faculty Summit, New Delhi, February, 2013.
28. Gave series of video lectures on Algorithms, Microsoft Research Massively Empowered
Classrooms online course, during January-May 2013.
29. Gave an invited talk on “Concurrent programming: old problems, new challenges” at
TACTiCs 2013, 9th Global TCS Technical Architects Conference, at Tata Consultancy
Services, Chennai, in April 2013.
30. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan, France and LIAFA, Univ Paris 7, France in May 2013. Pre-
sented a talk entitled “Deterministically Communicating MDPs” at LSV, ENS de Cachan,
France. Presented a talk entitled “Optimized OR-Sets Without Ordering Constraints” at
LIAFA, Univ Paris 7, France in May 2013.
31. Gave an invited talk on “Concurrent programming: old problems, new challenges” at
Global Analytics, Chennai, in June 2013.
32. Attended 12th Update Meeting on Advanced Formal Methods at New Delhi, in July
2013.
33. Presented a talk at the Round Table on “IT Systems in the industry: how to ensure soft-
ware reliability?” at India-France Technology Summit, New Delhi, in October 2013.
34. Visited IRISA, Rennes, France in September-October 2013 and presented a talk entitled
“Deterministically Communicating MDPs” at IRISA, Rennes, France in October 2013.
35. Gave an invited talk on “Correctness in a connected world”, IDRBT Doctoral Collo-
quium at Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology, Hyderabad, in
December 2013.
36. Participated in ACM India Annual Event at IIT Delhi, in February 2014.
37. Gave an invited talk on “Whos Afraid of Algorithms”, at MSR MEC Workshop, Chennai,
in February 2014.
38. Gave lectures on Data Mining and Machine Learning in the Business Analytics Training
Programme at ISI Chennai, in March 2014.
39. Gave lectures on NP-Completeness at SSN College of Engineering, Chennai, in March
2014.
40. Gave a talk on “Life and work of Leslie Lamport, Turing Tech Talk Series, Persistent
Systems” at Pune, in June 2014.
41. Gave a talk on “Concurrent programming: old problems, new challenges” at SV College
of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, in July 2014.
42. Gave a course on “Programming for Mathematics” at IMSc., Chennai, in August 2014.
43. Gave a talk on “Concurrent programming: old problems, new challenges” at NGP Insti-
tute of Technology, Coimbatore, in August 2014.
44. Gave MHRD QEEE online course on “Data Structures and Algorithms” at IIT Madras,
during August-September 2014.
45. Gave a talk on “Machine Learning” at Hindustan University, Chennai, in September
2014.
46. Gave a talk on “Efficient processing of range queries” at SSN College of Engineering, in
September 2014
47. Gave an invited tutorial at CSI National Conference on Formal Methods, IISc, Bangalore,
in October 2014 on “Statistical Model Checking”.
48. Visited National University of Singapore, in December 2014 Collaborative research with
P S Thiagarajan.
49. Attended 34th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Com-
puter Science (FSTTCS) 2014 New Delhi, in December 2014.
50. Attended 16th International Conference on Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract
Interpretation (VMCAI) 2015 at Mumbai, in January 2015.
51. Attended 42nd SIGACT/SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
(POPL) 2015 at Mumbai, in January 2015.
52. Gave an NPTEL MOOC course on Design and Analysis of Algorithms during January -
February 2015.
53. Gave AlgoLabs Certification Course on Machine Learning, in February 2015.
54. Attended ACM iSIGCSE workshop on ”Effective ways of teaching Computer Science”
at Pune, in February 2015.
55. Attended ACM India Annual Event and chaired a panel discussion on ”Overcoming chal-
lenges within the university system” at Goa, in February 2015.
56. Attended Workshop on Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems (ACTS) 2015 at
CMI, in February 2015.
57. Delivered a keynote talk on “Formalizing the Cloud”, International Symposium on Big
Data and Cloud Computing Challenges (ISBCC) at VIT, Chennai, in March 2015.
58. Gave an NPTEL MOOC course on Design and Analysis of Algorithms during July -
September 2015.
59. Gave an NPTEL MOOC course on Functional Programming in Haskell during July -
October2015.
K V Subrahmanyam:
K Narayan Kumar
1. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan in May-June 2010 funded by the ARCUS project of Ile-de-
France.
2. Attended 9th Update Meeting on Advanced Formal Methods at Ahmedabad and gave a
talk on “Analysis of Multi-stack Systems”, in July 2010.
3. Attended 21st International Conference on Concurrency Theory, Paris, France, in August
2010.
4. Attended 30th Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science
(FSTTCS 2010), at IMSc, Chennai, in December 2010.
5. Attended Workshop on Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems III, CMI, Chennai,
in February 2011.
6. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan in May-June 2011 and November 2011 on the ARCUS
project as well as the CNRS LIA “Informel”.
7. Attended 31st Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science
(FSTTCS 2011) at IIT Bombay, Mumbai, in December 2011.
8. Attended 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Software Science and
Computation Structures (FoSSaCS 2012), as part of ETAPS 2012, at Tallin, Estonia, in
March 2012.
9. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan in May 2012 and as part of the CNRS LIA “Informel”.
10. Attended the 10th International Conference on Automated Techniques for Verification
and Analysis (ATVA 2012), Thiruvananthapuram, October 2012.
11. Visited Uppsala University, Sweden, in Nov-Dec 2012.
12. Attended the 32nd Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Sci-
ence (FSTTCS 2012), IIIT, Hyderabad, December 2012.
13. Gave a talk titled “Verifying Temporal Properties of Multi-pushdown Systems” at the
IMPECS Workshop on Program Analysis, IISc Bangalore.
14. Attended CEFIPRA Workshop on “Challenges in overcoming complexity, from big data
to cyber-physical systems”, in April 2013.
15. Visited Uppsala University, Sweden, in May 2013.
16. Visited LSV, ENS de Cachan in June 2013 and as part of the CNRS LIA “Informel”.
17. Gave a talk on “Split-width and the Verification of Concurrent Recursive Programs”, at
TIFR, Mumbai, in July 2013.
18. Gave a talk on “Split-width and the Verification of Concurrent Recursive Programs”, at
IISc, Bangalore, in October 2013.
19. Visited LSV, ENS Cachan, France in May 2014.
20. Visited LaBRi, Univ. of Bordeaux, France in May 2014.
21. Visited Uppsala University, Sweden in June 2014.
22. Attended the 42nd ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Language (POPL
2015), in TIFR Bombay, Mumbai, in January 2015.
Samir Datta
Sourav Chakraborty
Partha Mukhopadhyay
Prajakta Nimbhorkar
B Srivathsan
S P Suresh
26. Faculty serving in (a) National committees, (b) International committees, (c) Editorial Boards,
(d) any other (please specify)
Madhavan Mukund
Member, Programme Committee of:
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK), 2011, 31st Conference, Braga, Portugal, 2010, 30th Confer-
ence, Paris, France, 2009, 29th Conference, Xian, China, 2008, 27th Conference, Turku,
Finland, 2006, 26th Conference, Miami, Florida, 2005)
10. SEFM, IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods
(9th Conference, Montevideo, Uruguay, 2011, 8th Conference, Pisa, Italy, 2010, 7th
Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2009, 4th Conference, Pune, India, 2006)
11. STACS, Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
(23rd Symposium, Marseilles, France, 2006)
12. TACAS, International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and
Analysis of Systems
(16th Conference, Paphos, Cyprus, 2010)
K. Narayan Kumar
Member, Programme Committe:
1. The Sixth International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verifica-
tion September 21 23, 2015, Genova, Italy
2. 16th International Workshop on Verification of Infinite-State Systems IIT Delhi, India,
18th of December 2014
3. 25th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR’14), Rome, Italy, Sep
2014.
4. 33rd International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical
Computer Science (FSTTCS’13), Guwahati, India, Dec 2013.
5. 7th International Workshop on Reachability Problems 2013 (RP’13), Uppsala, Sweden,
Sep 2013.
6. 10th International Symposium on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis
(ATVA 2012), Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 2012.
7. 31st International Conference on the Foundations of Software Technology and Theoreti-
cal Computer Science, IIT Bombay, Bombay, India, 2011.
8. 21st International Conference on Concurrency Theory, Paris, France, 2010. 9) 29th Inter-
national Conference on the Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Com-
puter Science, IIT Kanpur, India, 2009. (co-Chair and co-Editor of Proceedings with
Ravi Kannan)
Samir Datta
Member, Programme Committe:
S P Suresh
27. Faculty recharging strategies (UGC, ASC, Refresher / orientation programs, workshops,
training programs and similar programs).
Not considered necessary.
• Faculty
– Madhavan Mukund elected President of Indian Association for Research in Com-
puting Science, IARCS (2011-2017)
– Madhavan Mukund elected Vice-President of ACM India Council (2014-2016)
– Madhavan Mukund elected to the European Association of Theoretical Computer
Science (EATCS) Council (2007-2011)
– Madhavan Mukund appointed Executive Director, Internataional Olympiad in In-
formatics (2011-2014)
• Doctoral / post doctoral fellows
– Ramprasad Saptharishi awarded ACM India Doctoral Dissertation Award 2013
for best Computer Science PhD thesis in India.
• Students
None
30. Seminars/ Conferences/Workshops organized and the source of funding (national / interna-
tional) with details of outstanding participants, if any.
1. Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems (ACTS II) - January 2010, Local Organizers
- Madhavan Mukund, K. Narayan Kumar
Funded by CMI-TCS Academic Alliance and ARCUS programme, Ile-de-France, Indo-
French Network Project Timed-Discoveri
2. Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems (ACTS II) - January 2010, Local Organizers
- Madhavan Mukund, K. Narayan Kumar
Funded by CMI-TCS Academic Alliance and ARCUS programme, Ile-de-France.
3. ICM satellite conference on Mathematical Logic and Set Theory - August 2010, Local
organizer - S P Suresh.
Funded by International Mathematical Union (IMU) and Association for Symbolic Logic
(AS)
4. Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems (ACTS III) - January 2011, Organizers -
Madhavan Mukund, K. Narayan Kumar
Funded by CMI-TCS Academic Alliance and ARCUS programme, Ile-de-France.
5. Workshop on Pseudorandomness - August 2011, Organizers - K. V. Subrahmanyam,
Partha Mukhopadhyay, Sourav Chakraborty and V Balaji.
Funded by CMI-TCS Academic Alliance.
6. . Formal Methods Update Meeting 2012, July 2012, Organizers: Madhavan Mukund,
K. Narayan Kumar, S.P. Suresh
Funded by CMI
7. Making Formal Verification Scalable and Useable, January, 2013 Organizers: Madhavan
Mukund, Mandayam Srivas
Funded by CMI
8. 4th Workshop on Automata, Concurrency and Timed Systems, February 9-13 2015. Or-
ganizers: M. Praveen and B. Srivathsan
Funded by CMI
a) Library
CMI Library has an extensive collection of mathematics books.
b) Internet facilities for staff and students
CMI campus has 24 hours high-speed (32 Mbps) internet connection.
c) Total number of class rooms
12 (Shared by all departments)
d) Class rooms with ICT facility
All classrooms are equipped with projector and internet facility.
e) Students’ laboratories
Computer laboratory with 35 desktop PCs.
f) Research laboratories
No.
40. Number of post graduate students getting financial assistance from the university.
44
41. Was any need assessment exercise undertaken before the development of new programme(s)?
If so, highlight the methodology.
No.
b. students on staff, curriculum and teaching-learning-evaluation and how does the depart-
ment utilize the feedback?
There is no formal mechanism for student feedback, but students to provide feedback on
individual courses via their faculty advisors and this is discussed by the faculty in their
regular meetings.
c. alumni and employers on the programmes offered and how does the department utilize
the feedback?
There is no formal mechanism for feedback from alumni and employers, but any com-
ments or suggestions received are discussed by the faculty in their regular meetings.
44. Give details of student enrichment programmes (special lectures / workshops / seminar)
involving external experts.
Students participate in all the academic activities, such as seminars and workshops.
45. List the teaching methods adopted by the faculty for different programmes.
Each faculty member has complete academic freedom in the teaching methods he or she
adopts and varies from person to person and time to time. General methods include close
personal monitoring, continuous assessment through assignments, and exams; and term pa-
pers and presentations.
46. How does the department ensure that programme objectives are constantly met and learning
outcomes are monitored?
The Board of Studies and Academic Council of the institute meet periodically to ensure
that the programme objectives are met. Each PhD student has a doctoral committee which
monitors his/her progress.
49. State whether the programme/ department is accredited/ graded by other agencies? If yes,
give details.
No.
50. Briefly highlight the contributions of the department in generating new knowledge, basic or
applied.
The members of the department have published over 300 papers in reputed journals and
conferences. We are in the cutting edge of research in several areas of theoretical computer
science. We are one of the very few centres in India for research in some areas allied to
formal verification, logic, and complexity theory. The members of the department also
contribute to the CS teaching community by making widely available their lecture notes
Physics
1. Name of the Department
Physics
2. Year of establishment
2006
4. Names of programmes offered (UG, PG, M.Phil., Ph.D., Integrated Masters; Integrated
Ph.D., D.Sc., D.Litt., etc.)
10. Number of teaching posts sanctioned, filled and actual (Professors/Associate Professors/Asst
Professors/others)
Sanctioned Filled Actual (including CAS & MPS)
Professor – 2 2
Associate Professor – 2 2
Assistant Professor – 1 1
Others – 5 5
11. Faculty profile with name, qualification, designation, area of specialization, experience and
research under guidance
No. of
Ph.D/
No. of M.Phil
Qualifi- Years students
Name Designation Specialization
-cation of Expe- guided
rience for the
last 4
years
Theoretical
V.V. Sreedhar Ph.D. Professor 20 0
Physics
Theoretical
K. Narayan Ph.D. Professor 13 2
Physics
Govind Theoretical
Associate
Krishnaswami Ph.D. 11 1
Professor Physics
Associate Theoretical
K.G. Arun Ph.D. 9 0
Professor Physics
Assistant Theoretical
Alok Laddha Ph.D. 7 0
Professor Physics
• G. Rajasekaran
• H. S. Mani
• R. Parthasarathy
• R. Jagannathan
• T. R. Govindarajan
15. Number of academic support staff (technical) and administrative staff: sanctioned, filled and
actual
17. Number of faculty with ongoing projects from a) national b) international funding agencies
and c) Total grants received. Give the names of the funding agencies, project title and grants
received project-wise.
Nil.
a) National collaboration
Nil
b) International collaboration
Nil
19. Departmental projects funded by DST-FIST; UGC-SAP/CAS, DPE; DBT, ICSSR, AICTE,
etc.; total grants received.
Nil
• state recognition
Nil
• national recognition
Nil
• international recognition
Nil
22. Publications:
• Edited Books
• Books with ISBN with details of publishers
• Number listed in International Database (For e.g. Web of Science, Scopus, Humani-
ties International Complete, Dare Database - International Social Sciences Directory,
EBSCO host, etc.)
• Citation Index - range / average
• SNIP
• SJR
• Impact Factor - range / average
• h-index
In the areas of Physics that are represented at CMI, numeric indicators such as impact
factor and h-index are not meaningful. CMI faculty publish their research in interna-
tional journals and conferences that are recognized by the academic community as the
leading publication outlets in the corresponding areas.
25. Faculty selected nationally / internationally to visit other laboratories / institutions / indus-
tries in India and abroad
V.V. Sreedhar
K. Narayan
1. Attended “Conference on Cold Materials, Hot Nuclei and Black Holes: Applied Gauge/Gravity
Duality? held at the Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy, in August 2011.
2. ICGC2011 (International Conference on Gravitation and Cosmology) conference, Goa,
in December 2011 and gave a talk on “Cosmological singularities, AdS/CFT and de Sitter
deformations?.
3. Visited TIFR String theory group, in July 2011, and December 2011.
4. Visited the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics (KITP), University of Californaia Santa
Barbara, and the Physics Departments at Stanford University and University of Kentucky,
USA, May–Jun 2012. Gave a talk on “Aspects of Lifshitz scaling in string theory” at
KITP and the University of Kentucky.
5. Attended the Indian Strings Meeting (ISM2012), international string theory workshop,
Puri, India, Dec 2012. Gave a talk on “AdS plane waves, Lifshitz scaling, hyperscaling
violation and entanglement entropy”.
6. Visited the International Center for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS) and attended ”Discus-
sion Meeting on String Theory”, Bangalore, Jun 2012. Gave a talk on “Aspects of Lif-
shitz scaling in string theory”.
7. Visited the String Theory group, TIFR, Mumbai, July 2012.
8. Gave a Seminar at the Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai, Sep 2012 on
“Lifshitz scaling and hyperscaling violation in string theory”.
9. Attended the workshop on “Non-perturbative gauge theories, holography and all that”,
Center for High Energy Physics, IISc, Bangalore, Jan 2013. Gave a talk on “Hyperscaling
violation and entanglement entropy in gauge/string theory”.
10. Attended the Discussion Meeting on “String Theory”, TIFR, Mumbai, Jan 2013.
11. Visited String theory group, Institute for Advanced Study (IAS), Princeton, U.S.A., in
May 2013 and gave a talk on “D-brane plane waves, hyperscaling violation and entan-
glement entropy”.
12. Attended Great Lakes Strings Conference, in May 2013, at U. Kentucky, U.S.A. and gave
a talk on “D-brane plane waves, hyperscaling violation and entanglement entropy”.
13. Visited Center for Particle Physics, MIT, USA, in May 2013.
14. Attended “The Information Paradox, Black Holes and Entanglement” workshop, at ICTS
Bangalore, in September 2013.
15. Attended Prospects in Theoretical Physics, advanced school on string theory, Institute
for Advanced Study (IAS) & Princeton Univ., Princeton, U.S.A., in June 2014.
16. Attended “Strings 2014”, international conference on string theory, Institute for Ad-
vanced Study (IAS) & Princeton Univ., Princeton, U.S.A., in June 2014.
17. Gave a talk on “Aspects of extremal surfaces in (A)dS” at “Entanglement from Gravity”
Discussion Meeting around the Chandrasekhar Lectures given by Rob Myers, ICTS,
Bangalore, in December 2014.
18. Gave a talk on “Aspects of extremal surfaces in (A)dS” at Indian Strings Meeting, inter-
national string theory workshop, Puri, in December 2014.
Govind S. Krishnaswami
(a) Gave a talk on “A KdV-like wave equation with some remarkable properties”, at IISER
Thiruvananthapuram, in August 2011.
(b) Attended the first Meeting of DST-Ramanujan Fellows, Pune, 4–6 May, 2012.
(c) Along with Profs G. Rajasekaran and H. S. Mani, co-organised a national Refresher
Course on quantum mechanics (May 2013) at SB College Changanacherry, Kerala for
college and university faculty. This course is conducted by the three Indian science
academies under the chairmanship of Prof. N. Mukunda. Taught a lecture course (13
lectures) on relativistic quantum mechanics and gave some supplementary lectures on
non-relativistic quantum mechanics.
(d) Visited Thiruvananthapuram for physics discussions with Prof. S.G. Rajeev during
June 2013.
(e) Gave a talk on “Higgs mechanism and fluid mechanics” at the Second Ramanujan
Fellows Conclave at IISER Pune, during December 2013.
(f) Along with Professors G. Rajasekaran, H. S. Mani and K. S. Mallesh, co-organised
a national Refresher Course on quantum mechanics (December 2013) at JSS Ma-
haviyapeetha, Suttur, Karnataka for college and university faculty. Taught a lecture
course (13 lectures) on Quantum Mechanics: Formalism, Harmonic oscillator, Angu-
lar momentum, Identical particles, Atoms.
(g) Gave a talk on “A fluid analogy for the Higgs mechanism” in the International confer-
ence on New Trends in Field Theories, in November 2014 at Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi.
(h) Resource person for Science Academies national Refresher Course on Classical Me-
chanics and Electromagnetism at SDM College, Ujire, Karnataka for faculty and re-
search scholars and students in December 2014. Taught a lecture course (12 lectures,
each 90 minutes) on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, Poisson brackets and
Canonical transformations, Oscillations and Rigid bodies.
(i) Gave a rading course on “Geometrical and group theoretical methods in physics”.
(j) Hosted Prof A. Thyagaraja, Bristol, UK, in January 2015 for a collaboration meeting.
K.G. Arun
(a) Gave a colloquium on Gravitational Waves named “Audible Universe” at IIT Madras
in August 2011.
(b) Visited Raman Research Institute, Bangalore (May, September 2011 & February 2012).
(c) Visited IISER Thiruvananthapuram in July 2011 for research collaborations and gave
a seminar on “Parametrized Tests of Post-Newtonian theory using Gravitational Wave
Observations”.
(d) Attended International Conference on Cosmology & Gravitation, Goa, December 2011.
Gave a talk on “Generic bounds on dipolar Gravitational Radiation from inspiralling
compact binaries” in the work shop session. Contributed poster on “New accurate set
of PN phase parameters using singular value decomposition” with Archana Pai.
(e) Attended Indo-Japan Cooperative Science program (IJCSP) meeting at IISER Thiru-
vananthapuram in December 2011.
(f) Attended one week long IndIGO work shop at IUCAA, Pune in March 2012.
Alok Laddha
26. Faculty serving in (a) National committees, (b) International committees, (c) Editorial Boards,
(d) any other (please specify)
(i) National Organizing Committee, Indian Strings Meeting (ISM-12) international string
theory conference, Dec 16-21, 2012, Puri, India.
(ii) National Organizing Committee, Indian Strings Meeting (ISM-08) international string
theory conference, Dec 6-13, 2008, Pondicherry, India.
(iii) Local Organizing Committee, Indian Strings Meeting (ISM-08) international string
theory conference, Dec 6-13, 2008, Pondicherry, India.
(iv) Editorial Boards: Resonance, Current Science, Managing Editor: Texts and Readings
in Physics (Hindustan Book Agency), Physics Education, SIGMA: Symmetry, Inte-
grability, and Geometry: Methods and Applications.
27. Faculty recharging strategies (UGC, ASC, Refresher / orientation programs, workshops,
training programs and similar programs).
None.
• Faculty
1. Alok Laddha awarded the Ramanujan National Research Fellowship in 2012.
2. Govind Krishnaswami awarded the Ramanujan National Research Fellowship in
2009.
3. K. Narayan awarded the Ramanujan National Research Fellowship in 2008.
• Doctoral / post doctoral fellows
None
• Students
None
30. Seminars/ Conferences/Workshops organized and the source of funding (national / interna-
tional) with details of outstanding participants, if any.
1. A semester-long activity was organised in fluid mechanics which was completely funded
by CMI. It attracted distinguished experts in the field both from India and abroad. The
list of speakers included Abel Laureate S.R.S.Varadan from Courant Institute, New York
University, K.R. Sreenivasan, Director, Abdus Salam Institute for Theoretical Physics,
Italy and Courant Institute, A. Thyagaraja from Culham Laboratories, U.K., S. G. Rajeev,
University of Rochester, Shiraz Minwalla, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, R.
Narasimha, JNCASR, Bengaluru.
2. Asymptotia: A three-day workshop on asymptotic symmetries in Classical and Quantum
Gravity was conducted.
a) Library
CMI Library has an extensive collection of mathematics books.
b) Internet facilities for staff and students
CMI campus has 24 hours high-speed (32 Mbps) internet connection.
c) Total number of class rooms
11 (Shared by all departments)
d) Class rooms with ICT facility
All classrooms are equipped with projector and internet facility.
e) Students’ laboratories
There is a fully functional physics teaching laboratory which is small but sufficiently
well-equipped to meet the needs of students of the BSc(Hons) Mathematics and Physics
students.
f) Research laboratories
No.
• Ramadas N.
• Vishnu T.R.
40. Number of post graduate students getting financial assistance from the university.
10.
41. Was any need assessment exercise undertaken before the development of new programme(s)?
If so, highlight the methodology.
No.
44. Give details of student enrichment programmes (special lectures / workshops / seminar)
involving external experts.
Students actively participate in all academic activities including seminars and workshops.
45. List the teaching methods adopted by the faculty for different programmes.
Each faculty member has complete academic freedom in the teaching methods he or she
adopts and varies from person to person and time to time. General methods include close
personal monitoring, continuous assessment through assignments, and exams; and term pa-
pers and presentations.
46. How does the department ensure that programme objectives are constantly met and learning
outcomes are monitored?
The Board of Studies and Academic Council of the institute meet periodically to ensure
that the programme objectives are met. Each PhD student has a doctoral committee which
monitors his/her progress.
49. State whether the programme/ department is accredited/ graded by other agencies? If yes,
give details.
No.
50. Briefly highlight the contributions of the department in generating new knowledge, basic or
applied.
The department has published over sixty research papers in peer-reviewed national and in-
ternational journals of repute in its relatively short period of existence. It has also published
three books.
51. Detail five major Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) of the de-
partment.
them are Statistical Mechanics, Integrable Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Classical and
Quantum Information Sciences all frontier areas of physics with close and natural connec-
tions to Mathematics and Computer Science.
For the department to grow and take its rightful place as one of the leading centres of ex-
cellence, it is necessary that a vibrant graduate programme is established. It is a challenge
for a small group to compete with more established groups with large faculty strengths and
diverse research interests.
In view of the foregoing challenges, the department would like to attract promising candi-
dates that will complement and supplement our current strengths. Having a critical mass of
active faculty members with a reasonably diverse range of expertise is crucial in attracting
good quality research students and post-doctoral scholars. Once this is in place, the problem
of handling large number of students at the undergraduate level will also be automatically
solved.
Having said that, we are also acutely aware of both our strengths and limitations. So, we plan
to focus, at least in the foreseeable future, to restrict our interests to theoretical physics so
that we can establish a synergy between the mathematics and computer sciences departments
at CMI.