Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Experimental Study On The Structural Behavior of Circumferentially and Diametrical Braced Domes

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE STRUCTURAL

BEHAVIOR OF CIRCUMFERENTIALLY AND


DIAMETRICAL BRACED DOMES

BY
THAMER ADEL TAHA

SUPERVISED BY
ASST. PROF. AAMER NAJIM ABBAS
INTRODUCTION
A structure can be classified as a shell if have a curvature in one or two directions, and
have a thickness smaller than other two dimensions. A shell is a three dimensional
structure having two surfaces parallel its centerline. The geometry of a shell is entirely
defined by specifying the form of the middle surface and thickness of the shell at each
point. Shells have all the characteristics of plates, along with an additional one
curvature. The curvature could be chosen as the primary classifier of a shell because a
shell’s behavior under an applied loading is primarily governed by curvature.
Depending on the curvature of the surface, shells are divided into cylindrical
(noncircular and circular), conical, spherical, ellipsoidal, paraboloidal, toroidal, and
hyperbolic paraboloidal shells. Owing to the curvature of the surface, shells are more
complicated than flat plates because their bending cannot. Domes that a shell have a
semi spherical shape, it can presents a large span. Using this type of structures belong
to 700 BC, when the pantheon dome was constructed by masonry units, its diameter
was 44m.
PARAMETER IN THIS STUDY
NSC
Type of concrete MRPC
RPC

2mm Steel ring only


Thickness of steel plate
4mm Steel ring with rib

Strengthening by using RPC Ring only


RPC
RPC Ring with rib

Height and layer of Height 20mm 1 layer of GFRP


circumferentially GFRP Height 40mm 2 layer of GFRP

1 strip of GFRP
Meridional GFRP
2 strip of GFRP
AIMS OF THE STUDY

1. Investigated the structural behavior of domes under the


influence of different types of strengthening.
2. Preventing lateral movement that occurs at the bottom of
the dome due to the concentration of stresses in this area,
using different types of strengthening methods.
3. Evaluate the structural behavior of thin shell (dome)
made with reactive powder concrete, modified reactive
powder concrete and normal strength concrete.
METHODOLOGY
For the purpose of achieving the main objectives of a study, 15
models of domes were cast and divided according to the research
variables as follows.
15 Domes

3 Domes 2 Domes 4 Domes 2 Domes 4 Domes

Type of Strengthening Thickness of Meridional Circumferential


concrete by using RPC steel plate of GFRP ly of GFRP
EXPERIMENTAL WORK

Experimental program

Casting and curing Bracing of dome Tested of dome


of dome
Casting and curing of
domes

1. Mold of dome

2. Aluminum foil 3. Welded wire mesh


EXPERIMENTAL WORK

4. Oil of mold and 5. Casting of dome 6. Curing of dome


installing welded wire
mesh
EXPERIMENTAL WORK Bracing of domes

1. Bracing by using RPC as ring beam and ring beam


with rib
EXPERIMENTAL WORK Bracing of domes

2. Bracing by using steel plate as ring beam and ring beam


with rib

Steel plate Cutting machine

Steel plate Forming machine Channel section


(channel section) Rotating
machine
EXPERIMENTAL WORK Bracing of dome

Ring beam with rib

Ring beam
Sika-dur 330

Mixing ratio
part A: part B = 4:1
by weight

Joining steel ring with dome by using epoxy


EXPERIMENTAL WORK Bracing of dome

3. Bracing by using meridional GFRP strips and steel ring (2mm thickness)

Steel ring (2mm thickness)

Meridional GFRP 2 strip


Meridional GFRP 1 strip
EXPERIMENTAL WORK Bracing of dome

4. Bracing by using circumferentially GFRP ( height and layer of GFRP)

Clean of surface Epoxy GFRP sheet

Fiber Type High Strength Carbon Fiber*

Areal weight 300 gm/m2

Fabric thickness 0.167mm

Tensile strength of fibers 3820 N/mm2

Tensile E modulus of fibers 230000 N/mm2

length roll 100 m

Width roll 0.5 m


EXPERIMENTAL WORK Tested of domes

You might also like