Q: What Is The Difference Between These Administrative and Judicial Remedies?
Q: What Is The Difference Between These Administrative and Judicial Remedies?
Q: What Is The Difference Between These Administrative and Judicial Remedies?
INCTAXA
CompiledbyJ.Casem
There are remedies that may be availed of by the government.
There are remedies that may be resorted to by the taxpayer.
These remedies are either administrative or judicial.
Q: What is the difference between these administrative and judicial remedies?
A: Administrative remedies are those that do not require judicial proceedings,
Whereas judicial remedies are those that require /necessitate /warrant judicial actions or
proceedings.
REMEDIES OF THE TAXPAYER
These are legal actions which a taxpayer can avail to seek relief from the undue burden or oppressive
effect of tax laws, or as means to check possible excesses by revenue officers in the performance of
their duties.
A. Administrative remedies
a. Protest of assessment;
i. Reconsideration
ii. Reinvestigation
b. Compromise; and
c. Abatement
B. Judicial Remedies
A. Administrative remedies
a. Tax refund
b. Tax credit
B. Judicial remedies
B. Judicial Remedies
1. Civil action;
2. Criminal action;
ASSESSMENT
An assessment contains not only a computation of tax liabilities, but also a demand for payment within
a prescribed period. It also signals the time when penalties and interests begin to accrue against the
taxpayer. To enable the taxpayer to determine his remedies thereon, due process requires that it must
be served on and received by the taxpayer.
- DETERMINING THE CORRECTNESS of TAX DUE and
- Giving a WRITTEN NOTICE of the FINDING to the taxpayer.
- ISSUING A DEMAND FOR PAYMENT of a tax LIABILITY OF DEFICIENCY
TAX ASSESSMENT – formal letter made by the BIR demanding the taxpayer to settle his liability
within an indicated period
Who makes assessment? CIR or his duly authorized representative
ASSESSMENT PERIOD-
-refers to a span of time allowed by law to investigate a taxpayer’s discrepancy.
Q: Which comes first, assessment or collection?
A: Assessment precedes collection except when the unpaid tax is a tax due per return as in the case
of a self-assessed income tax under the pay-as-you-file system in which case collection may be
instituted without need of assessment.
Q: When assessment is made ?
A: An assessment is deemed made only when the Collector of Internal Revenue RELEASES, MAILS
OR SENDS such notice to the taxpayer (CIR, v. Pascor Realty and Development Corporation, et. al. G.R.
No. 128315, June 29, 1999).
JEOPARDY ASSESSMENT
TAX REMEDIES
INCTAXA
CompiledbyJ.Casem
A delinquency tax assessment made without the benefit of a complete or partial investigation by an
authorized revenue officer who has a reason to believe that the assessment and collection of a
deficiency tax will be jeopardized by delay caused by the taxpayer’s failure to:
a. Comply with audit and investigation requirements to present his books of accounts and/or
pertinent records, or
b. Substantiate all or any of the deductions, exemptions or credits claimed in his return (Sec. 3
(1)(a), R.R. 30-2002).
Provided the release was effected before the prescription sets in, the assessment is deemed made on
time, even if the taxpayer actually receives if after the prescriptive period.
TAX REMEDIES
INCTAXA
CompiledbyJ.Casem
However, the fact that the assessment notice was mailed before the prescription period sets in must
be proved with substantial evidence by the CIR. The presumption that a letter duly directed and
mailed was received in the regular course of mail cannot be applied if there is no substantial evidence
to prove that the notice was indeed sent (Ingles, 2015).
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
Protest under the NIRC
Preliminary Assessment
A: The BIR will issue the Final Assessment Notice (FAN) or Final Letter of Demand (FLD).
5
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
Suspension of prescriptive Allowed Not allowed
period (Section 228)
1. When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in the computation of the tax
as appearing on the face of the return; or
2. When a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld and the amount actually
remitted by the withholding agent; or
3. When a taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or tax credit of excess creditable withholding tax for a
taxable period was determined to have carried over and automatically applied the same amount
claimed against the estimated tax liabilities for the taxable quarter or quarters of the succeeding
taxable year; or
4. When the excise tax due on excisable articles has not been paid; or
5. When the article locally purchased or imported by an exempt person, such as, but not limited to,
vehicles, capital equipment, machineries and spare parts, has been sold, traded or transferred to non-
exempt persons.
Q: What is the purpose of the 60-day period after filing the administrative protest?
A: It is required in request for reinvestigation where relevant supporting documents shall be submitted.
6
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
Q: What happens if there is a decision by the Commissioner?
A: If there is a decision, the taxpayer may opt to;
1. Appeal to the CTA within 30 days from receipt of the decision;or
2. File a request for reinvestigation within 30 days from receipt.
TAX REFUND
1. Tax Refund – When a refund check or warrant remains unclaimed or uncashed within 5 years from
date of mailing or delivery.
2. Tax Credit – a Tax Credit Certificate which remains unutilized after 5 years from date of issue, shall be
invalid. Unless revalidated (Sec. 230, NIRC).
No suit or proceeding shall be filed after the expiration of 2 years from the date of payment of the tax or
penalty regardless of any supervening cause that may arise after payment (Sec 229, NIRC).
It is necessary that the tax be paid in full, and that the claim for refund in the BIR as well as the
proceedings in the CTA be commenced within 2 years counted from the payment of the tax.
Thus, as a rule, the two-year prescriptive period runs from the payment of tax. However, the following
instances provide for different commencement of the two-year period.
Tax is paid in installments (For individuals): From the date of the final payment
Payments effected through the withholding tax system: From the date it falls due at the end of the
taxable year
Overpaid quarterly corporate income tax: From the date the final adjustment return is filed after the
end of the taxable year. The period is counted from the actual filing, not the last day allowed by law to file.
Example;
For instance, local tax was paid in 2016. In 2017, there was finding to effect that this taxpayer was
exempt. What’s the reckoning date of the 2-year period? 2016 or 2017?
7
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
2017 is from the time he is entitled thereto. But if it were a revenue tax, you should count that from the
date of payment.
Q: What are the requisites for a tax refund under the NIRC?
A: The requisites are as follows;
1. There must be a written claim for refund filed by the taxpayer with the commissioner;
2. The claim for refund must be a categorical demand for reimbursement;
3. The claim for refund must be filed within two years from date of payment of the tax or penalty
regardless of any supervening cause;
Q: In case of a leap year, which will prevail; the Civil Code or the Administrative Code?
A: The Administrative Code(12 months regardless of number of days). Lex posterior derogat prior. It
means that recent law prevails over prior law. The prior law must yield to recent law otherwise. The
recent law is the 1987 Administrative Code. That is you’re your reason why.
PROBLEM 1:
Q: GJM filed its Annual Income Tax Return for the taxable year 1999 on April 12, 2000. BIR sent
FAN through registered mail on April 14, 2003, well within the 3-year prescriptive period. GJM
however denies having received any FAN. BIR failed to prove that GJM received the FAN. Should
the assessment be given due course?
Tax Return Filed for taxable year 1999- April 12, 2000
BIR sent FAN – April 14, 2003
8
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
Should the assessment be given due course?
A: NO. When an assessment is made within the prescriptive period, as in the case at bar, receipt by the
taxpayer may or may not be within said period. But the rule does not dispense with the requirement that
the taxpayer should actually receive the assessment notice, even beyond the prescriptive period. If the
taxpayer denies having received the assessment from the BIR, it then becomes incumbent upon the latter
to prove by competent evidence that such notice was indeed received by the addressee.
Here, the onus probandi has shifted to the BIR to show by contrary evidence that GJM indeed received the
assessment in the due course of mail. While it is true that an assessment is made when the notice is sent
within the prescriptive period, the release, mailing, or sending of the same must still be clearly and
satisfactorily proved (CIR v. GJM, G.R. No. 202695, February 29, 2016).
PROBLEM 2:
On March 10, 2010, Continental, Inc. received a preliminary assessment notice (PAN) dated March 1,
2010 issued by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) for deficiency income tax for its taxable year
2008. It failed to protest the PAN. The CIR thereupon issued a final assessment notice (FAN) with letter of
demand on April 30, 2010. The FAN was received by the corporation on May 10, 2010, following which or
on May 25, 2010, it filed its protest against it. The CIR denied the protest on the ground that the
assessment had already become final and executory, the corporation having failed to protest the PAN. Is
the CIR correct? Explain. (5%)
May 10, 2010 – received PAN (dated March 1, 2010) for taxable year 2008
Failed to protest PAN.
CIR issued FAN with Final Letter of Demand on April 30, 2010
FAN received by Corp May 10, 2010
May 25, 2010 – filed Protest
CIR denied protest – ground- Assessment had already become Final and Executory having failed to
protest the PAN.
Is the CIR Correct?
No. The issuance of preliminary assessment notice (PAN) does not give rise to the right of the
taxpayer to protest. What can be protested by the taxpayer is the final assessment notice (FAN) or
that assessment issued following the PAN. Since the FAN was timely protested (within 30 days
from receipt thereof, the assessment did not become final and executory
9
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
Since MNO Corporation adopted fiscal year ending June 30 as its taxable year for income tax purposes, it
paid its 2% business tax for fiscal year ending June 30, 2007 based on gross sales of P15 million.
However, the Quezon City Treasurer assessed the corporation for deficiency business tax for 2007 based
on gross sales of P25 million alleging that local business taxes shall be computed based on calendar year.
Q1: Is the position of the city treasurer tenable? Explain.
A1: Yes. Under Sec. 165 of the Local Government Code, the taxable period for the payment of
business taxes is the calendar year.
Q2: May the deficiency business tax be paid in installments without surcharge and interest? Explain.
A2: Yes, provided there is a valid tax ordinance enacted for that purpose that does not impose
such surcharge and/or interest on any taxes not paid (Sec. 192, Local Government Code).
On May 15, 2009, La Manga Trading Corporation received a deficiency business tax assessment of
P1,500,000.00 from the Pasay City Treasurer. On June 30, 2009, the corporation contested the
assessment by filing a written protest with the City Treasurer. On October 10, 2009, the corporation
received a collection letter from the City Treasurer, drawing it to file on October 25, 2009 an appeal
against the assessment before the Pasay Regional Trial Court (RTC). (IXa) Was the protest of the
corporation filed on time? Explain.
The taxpayer has the right to protest an assessment within 60 days from receipt thereof (Sec 195,
LGC).
(IXb) Was the appeal with the Pasay RTC filed on time? Explain.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The appeal was not filed on time. When an assessment is protested, the treasurer has 60 days
within which to decide. The taxpayer has 30 days from receipt of the denial of the protest or from
the lapse of the 60-day period to decide whichever comes first, otherwise the assessment becomes
conclusive and unappeallable.
Since no decision becomes conclusive and unappeallable. Since no decision on the protest was
made, the taxpayer should have appealed to the RTC within 30 days from the lapse of the period
to decide the protest (Sec 195, LGC).
PROBLEM
The taxpayer received an assessment notice on April 15, 2019 and filed its request for reinvestigation
against the assessment on April 30, 2019. Additional documentary evidence in support of its protest was
submitted by it on June 29, 2011. If no denial of the protest was received by the taxpayer, when is the last
day for the filing of its appeal to the CTA?
PAN- April 15, 2011
10
TAX REMEDIES UNDER NIRC CompiledbyJ.Casem-June2019
Request for Reinv- April 30, 2019 (60 days
Additional Evidence- June 29, 2019
(A) November 30, 2011; (B) December 30, 2011; (C) January , 2020; (D) February 28, 2012.
Using the same facts in the immediately preceding number, but assuming that the final decision on the
disputed assessment was received by the taxpayer on July 30, 2011, when is the last day for filing of the
appeal to the CTA.
(A) August 30, 2011; (B) September 30, 2011; (C) December 30, 2011; (D) January 30, 2012.
PROBLEM
Q: On Mar. 12, 2001, REN paid his taxes. Ten months later, he realized that he had overpaid and
immediately filed a claim for refund with the CIR. On Feb. 27, 2003, he received the decision of the
CIR denying REN's claim for refund. On Mar. 24, 2003, REN filed an appeal with the CTA. Was his
appeal filed on time or not?
A: NO, his appeal was not filed on time. The 2-year period for filing a claim for refund is not only a
limitation for pursuing the claim at the administrative level but also for appealing the case to the CTA.
The law provides that "no suit or proceeding shall be filed after the expiration of 2 years from the date of
the payment of the tax or penalty regardless of any supervening cause that may arise after payment.
Since the appeal was only made on Mar. 24, 2003, more than two years had already elapsed from the time
the taxes were paid on Mar. 12, 2003. Accordingly, REN had lost his judicial remedy because of
prescription.
11