Assignment of Psycology
Assignment of Psycology
Assignment of Psycology
Biological psychologists are interested in
measuring biological, physiological, or
genetic variables in an attempt to relate
them to psychological or behavioural
variables. Because all behaviour is controlled
by the central nervous system, biological
psychologists seek to understand how the
brain functions in order to understand
behaviour. Key areas of focus include
sensation and perception; motivated
behaviour (such as hunger, thirst, and sex);
control of movement; learning and memory;
sleep and biological rhythms; and emotion. As
technical sophistication leads to
advancements in research methods, more
advanced topics such as language, reasoning,
decision making, and consciousness are now
being studied.
Biological psychology has its roots in early
structuralist and functionalist psychological
studies, and as with all of the major
perspectives, it has relevance today. In section
1.2, we discuss the history and development of
functionalism and structuralism. In this
chapter, we extend this discussion to include
the theoretical and methodological aspects of
these two approaches within the biological
perspective and provide examples of relevant
studies.
The early structural and functional
psychologists believed that the study of
conscious thoughts would be the key to
understanding the mind. Their approaches to
the study of the mind were based on
systematic and rigorous observation, laying
the foundation for modern psychological
experimentation. In terms of research focus,
Wundt and Titchener explored topics such as
attention span, reaction time, vision, emotion,
and time perception, all of which are still
studied today.
Wundt’s primary method of research
was introspection, which involves training
people to concentrate and report on their
conscious experiences as they react
to stimuli. This approach is still used today in
modern neuroscience research; however,
many scientists criticize the use of
introspection for its lack of empirical
approach and objectivity. Structuralism was
also criticized because its subject of interest –
the conscious experience – was not easily
studied with controlled experimentation.
Structuralism’s reliance on introspection,
despite Titchener’s rigid guidelines, was
criticized for its lack of reliability. Critics
argued that self-analysis is not feasible, and
that introspection can yield different results
depending on the subject. Critics were also
concerned about the possibility of
retrospection, or the memory of sensation
rather than the sensation itself.
Today, researchers argue for introspective
methods as crucial for understanding certain
experiences and contexts.Two Minnesota
researchers (Jones & Schmid, 2000)
used autoethnography, a narrative
approach to introspective analysis (Ellis,
1999), to study the phenomenological
experience of the prison world and the
consequent adaptations and transformations
that it evokes. Jones, serving a year-and-a-day
sentence in a maximum security prison, relied
on his personal documentation of his
experience to later study the psychological
impacts of his experience.
From Structuralism to
Functionalism
As structuralism struggled to survive the
scrutiny of the scientific method, new
approaches to studying the mind were
soughtBuilt on structuralism’s concern for the
anatomy of the mind, functionalism led to
greater concern about the functions of the
mind, and later on to behaviourism.
One of James’s students, James Angell,
captured the functionalist perspective in
relation to a discussion of free will in his 1906
text Psychology: An Introductory Study of
the Structure and Function of Human
Consciousness:
Inasmuch as consciousness is a systematising,
unifying activity, we find that with increasing
maturity our impulses are commonly
coordinated with one another more and more
perfectly. We thus come to acquire definite
and reliable habits of action. Our wills become
formed. Such fixation of modes of willing
constitutes character. The really good man is
not obliged to hesitate about stealing. His
moral habits all impel him immediately and
irrepressibly away from such actions. If he
does hesitate, it is in order to be sure that the
suggested act is stealing, not because his
character is unstable. From one point of view
the development of character is never
complete, because experience is constantly
presenting new aspects of life to us, and in
consequence of this fact we are always engaged
in slight reconstructions of our modes of
conduct and our attitude toward life. But in a
practical common-sense way most of our
important habits of reaction become fixed at a
fairly early and definite time in life.
Functionalism considers mental life and
behaviour in terms of active adaptation to the
person’s environment. As such, it provides the
general basis for developing psychological
theories not readily testable by controlled
experiments such as applied psychology.
William James’s functionalist approach to
psychology was less concerned with the
composition of the mind than with examining
the ways in which the mind adapts to changing
situations and environments. In functionalism,
the brain is believed to have evolved for the
purpose of bettering the survival of its carrier by
acting as an information processor.
IMPORTANCE
THE END