NOTES

1
K. Ramey (2012). Types of Technology Used in the Classroom. Use of
Technology. Retrieved from http://www.useoftechnology.com/types-
technology-classroom/
2
J. Garofalo, H. Drier, S. Harper, M.A. Timmerman, & T. Shockey, (2000).
Promoting Appropriate Uses of Technology in Mathematics Teacher
Preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,
1(1). Retrieved from
http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/mathematics/article1.ht
m.
3
J. Kaput, S. Hegedus, & R. Lesh (2007). Technology becoming infrastructural in
mathematics education. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. J. Kaput (Eds.),
Foundations for the future mathematics education (pp. 173-191). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4
J. Dockstader (2008). Teachers of the 21st century know the what, why, and
how of technology integration. Retrieved from http://the-
tech.mit.edu/Chemicool/
5
E. Billings, & C. Mathison (2011). I get to use an iPod in school? Using
technology-based advance organizers to support the academic success of
English Learners. Journal of Science Education Technology, 21(4), 494-
503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9341-0
6
A. Oliver, J. O. Osa, & T. M. Walker (2012). Using instructional technologies to
enhance teaching and learning for the 21st century preK-12 students.
International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(4), 283-295 .
7
R. De Pasquale, Mc Namara, E. & K. Murphy (2003). Meaningful connections:
Using technology in primary classrooms. Young Children on the Web.
Retrieved from
http://journal.naeyc.org/btj/200311/techinprimaryclassrooms.pdf
8
R. S. Earle (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public
education; Promises and challenges. ET Magazine, 42(1), 5-13. Retrieved
July 23, 2008, from http://bookstoread.com/earle.pdf
9
B. Ferguson (1997). Educational technology: An extended literature review.
Retrieved from
http://www.sdavjr.davis.k12.ut.us/~brian/research/exlitrev.htm
10
H. Wenglinsky (2001). Flunking ETS: How teaching matters. Education Matters,
1(2), 75-78. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Centre.
21
B. Fishman, & E. Davis (2006). Teacher learning research and the learning
sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning
sciences (pp. 535-550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22
P. Irenea Olivares GES II (Mathematics) SED (1998) Regional Office V
“Guidelines in Teaching Mathematics”
23
L. Pascua (1993). Secondary Mathematics Education in the Philippines Today.
Bell, G (Ed). Asian Perspectives on Mathematics Education. Te University
of New England, Australia.
24
Fund for Assistance to Private Education (1988). Proceedings of the
conference on the Participation of Private Schools in the Secondary
Education Development Project
25
UP National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development
(2001) One Hundred Years of Science and Mathematics Education in the
Philippines. Diliman, QC, Pundasyon.
26
E. C. Itaas, (March 2009). “Capacity -building for Philippine Public Secondary
School Teachers on the Information and Communications Technology
Literacy Training Program,
27
The Philippine Star (April 8, 2006). Public school teachers to get free computer
training.

28
M D. Labian, Jr. (April 2007). “Status and Problems of ICT program in the
secondary schools of Northern Samar.
29
C. Rodriguez (2007). Building teachers’ capacity to make better use of ICT in
Philippines schools
30
J. A. Lapus (July 2008). “Philippine Digital Literacy Program to Train and Certify
Public School Teachers,” Certiport Success Story
31
F. G. Escudero (2003). “An Act to Integrate a ComputerEducation Program into
the Educational System and for other Purposes,” 12th Congress, Quezon
City.
32
T. L. Manzano (November 2002). Computerization of Instructions in the Public
Secondary Schools of Nueva Ecija: An evaluation.
33
M. N. Casiano (2007). Teaching Computer for Secondary and Tertiary Levels,
Rex Bookstore, Manila.
34
M. Robles (2006). Designing and Implementing an Effective Teacher
Professional Development Program on ICT Integration: A Framework for
Decision-Making.
35
G. Engel & T. Green (2011). Cell Phones in the Classroom: Are We Dialing Up
Disaster? Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning,
55(2), 39-45.
36
M. Pustari (2014) Pengaruh Penggunaan Microsoft Mathematics Terhadap
Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPS Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Materi
Turunan Fungsi. Unpublised Thesis. STKIP Kebangkitan Nasional,
Jakarta, 2014.
37
R. MacBride & A. Luehmann (2008). Capitalizing on Emerging Technologies: A
Case Study of Classroom Blogging. School Science & Mathematics,
108(5), 173-183.
38
Garofalo, et al. (2000). Promoting Appropriate Uses Of Technology in
Mathematics Teacher Preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology
and Teacher Education, 1(1). Retrieved from
http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/mathematics/article1.ht
m. (p.67)
39
J.House & J. A. Telese (2011). Effects of Computer Activities and Classroom
Lesson Strategies on Motivation for Mathematics Learning for Eighth-
Grade Students in the United States and Korea. International Journal Of
Instructional Media, 38(3), 295-306
40
G. Engel & Green T. (2011). Cell Phones in the Classroom: Are We Dialing Up
Disaster? Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning,
55(2), 39-45.
41
R. MacBride & A. Luehmann (2008). Capitalizing on Emerging Technologies:
A Case Study of Classroom Blogging. School Science & Mathematics,
108(5), 173-183.
42
M. Shirley, L. Irving, K.E. Sanalan, S. J. V.A. Pape, & D.T. Owens (2011). The
Practicality of Implementing Connected Classroom Technology in
Secondary
Mathematics and Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science &
Mathematics Education, 9(2), 459-481.
43
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2011). Using Calculators for
Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Retrieved from
http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Research_News_and_Advocacy/Rese
arch/Clps_and_Briefs/2011-Research_brief_18-calculator.pdf
44
The Geometer’s Sketchpad. (2009). Algebra With Sketchpad. Retrieved from
http://learningcenter.dynamicgeometry.com/x402.xml
45
E. Often (2011). Crosswalks and quality: linking math language and cte
standards. Techniques (ACTE), 86(3), 52-55. Retrieved from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?
accno=EJ92079
46
D. Beck-Hill & Y. Rosen (2012). Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one
laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the time to
know program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3),
225-241. Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.nwmissouri.edu:2060/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
sid=274f4f19a3a5-4bdd-a189-
1a08b17512de@sessionmgr14&vid=3&hid=9
47
W. Haddad and Draxler (2012). “The Dynamics of Technology for Education”,
UNESCO and AED, Paris and Washington.
48
Jesa Mae Larobis, PennyLyn Olima, N. Copio, John Ray C. (2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/97403709/Computer-Literacy-Program-
Thesis#scribd
49
Famor (2009) National Framework Plan for ICTs in Basic Education Harnessing
ICTs for Quality Basic Education for All. http://ebookbrowse.com/national-
framework-plan-for-icts-in-basic-education-pdf-d18473851\
50
R. F. Dollado, Jr. (2009). “A Computer Education Program for the Teachers of
Calbayog Pilot Central School: A feasibility study.” Unpublished Master’s
Thesis, Tiburcio Tancinco Memorial Institute of Science and Technology,
Calbayog City.
51
N. G. Cajilig, (2009). Integration of Information and Communication Technology
in Mathematics Teaching in Metro Manila Public Secondary Schools.
College of Education, University of the Philippines, Diliman.
52
M. F. Valenzuela (March 2010). “Perceived Technology Orientation and
Competency of Non-Computer Teachers in Dasmarinas National High
School–Main: Input for Staff Development.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis.
Technological University of the Philippines, Manila.
53
V. L. Tinio (2012). Survey of Information & Communication Technology
Utilization in Philippine Public High Schools. Foundation for Information
Technology Education and Development.
54
F. De Guzman, L. Landrito, A. Ocampo, E. Ronda, R. San Jose, S. Ulep, & C.
Vistro-Yu (2011). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study
Philippine Report: Volume II Mathematics, Population I. Quezon City:
DOST-SEI, DepEd, UP NISMED.
55
F.D. Davis Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance
of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319-340.
56
T. Teo, C. B. Lee and C. S. Chai (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers’
computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance
model. Journal of computer assisted learning, 24(2), 128-143.
57
P. Mishra, & M. J. Koehler (2006). Technological pedagogical content
knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College
Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
58
L. S. Shulman (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.
Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
59
ISTE (2008). International Society for Technology in Education (Ed.). (2008).
National educational technology standards for teachers (NETS-T) and
performance indicators. R etrieved from http://www.iste.org

60
D. L. Johnson & L. Liu, (2000). First steps toward a statistically generated
information technology integration model. Computers in the Schools,
16(2), 3-12.