Seminar Report On Ion Propulsion
Seminar Report On Ion Propulsion
Seminar Report On Ion Propulsion
INTRODUCTION:
Since Space Age began with Sputnik 1 launch in 1957, aerospace industry has
been evolving driven by the demand of the current society. Communication satellites
nowadays are the best known application of space technology, since nobody could
imagine their life today without services such as long distance calling or satellite
television. However, there are many others uses of Earth Orbiting spacecraft,
including navigation systems, Earth observation or scientific research. Some
examples are GPS satellites, the International Space Station or the Hubble Space
Telescope. Furthermore, technology development has enabled us to complete
exploration missions, reaching important targets like the Moon or different planets in
the Solar System.
One of the main challenges in each mission is to find the most suitable space
propulsion system. A spacecraft does not only have to leave the Earth’s surface, but it
also must achieve its optimum orbit and keep it, or speed up the vehicle in order to
decrease the travel time.
Until now, the only way to escape from the dense atmosphere is through huge
amounts of fuel and large thrusts (achieved with chemical propulsion), but once in the
space, the propulsion requirements are very different. Low thrust propulsion systems
are ideal for such in-space applications and, from among them all, we can highlight
the electric thrusters.
They offer several advantages with respect to the conventional chemical engines.
For example, they are more efficient, requiring much less propellant to produce the
same overall effect. Propellant is ejected much faster, generating higher specific
impulses (𝐼𝑠𝑝), which is a measure of the efficiency of rockets. Consequently, they
provide small accelerations, and it takes much longer to achieve particular speeds.
Nevertheless, the thrust they produce can be applied over long periods of time,
enabling spacecraft to acquire high speeds needed for interplanetary missions.
Moreover, they are able to regulate their thrust, making it possible to control the
spacecraft’s attitude with exceptional precision. Next figure reflects the working
ranges of thrust and 𝐼𝑠𝑝 for both propulsion systems.
Fig.1 Range of thrust and 𝐼𝑠𝑝
In Fig 1, we can see that electrical systems provide lower accelerations (low thrust
levels), but require much less propellant mass (high 𝐼𝑠𝑝) than chemical propulsion
systems. The advantages of the electrical engines make them suitable for many space
missions.
Nowadays, electric propulsion is considered in operations like:
- State of the art research. Analysis of the ion thruster existing applications.
- Results validation.