Courier Journal Files Lawsuit Against LMPD Seeking Records in Breonna Taylor Case
Courier Journal Files Lawsuit Against LMPD Seeking Records in Breonna Taylor Case
Courier Journal Files Lawsuit Against LMPD Seeking Records in Breonna Taylor Case
v.
Serve:
Mike O’Connell
Jefferson County Attorney
531 Court Place, Suite 900
Louisville, KY 40202
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, The Courier-Journal, Inc., brings this lawsuit under the Open Records Act against
Louisville Metro Police Department (“LMPD”) to compel disclosure of public documents related
to LMPD’s now-completed investigation of the death of Breonna Taylor, who was shot and killed
its principal office address at 525 West Broadway, Louisville, Kentucky 40202.
KRS 61.870(1) and is located at 633 W. Jefferson Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202.
3. This action is brought pursuant to KRS 61.882 to appeal LMPD’s denial of an open
records request submitted by Courier-Journal reporter Tessa Duvall and to obtain injunctive relief
requiring LMPD to disclose public records in violation of the Open Records Act.
1
4. Jurisdiction and venue are proper in this Court because LMPD’s principal place of
business is in Jefferson County, Kentucky and because the public records at issue in this action are
FACTS
5. Shortly before 1:00 a.m. on March 13, 2020, three LMPD Officers broke down the
6. After Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired a shot in apparent self defense
7. Ms. Taylor was struck by at least 8 bullets fired by LMPD officers and died at the
scene.
8. LMPD officers arrested Mr. Walker and charged him with various offenses,
9. At the time of the shooting, LMPD was executing a no-knock search warrant for
Taylor’s residence in connection with a raid on a suspected drug house on Elliott Avenue, located
10. Upon information and belief, the warrant application for Ms. Taylor’s home
suggested that a U.S. Postal Inspector informed LMPD that Jamarcus Glover – one of the targets
of the Elliott Avenue raid – received mail at Ms. Taylor’s residence. Subsequent reporting quoting
a U.S. Postal Inspector located in Louisville has suggested that his office did not inform LMPD
that Glover had been receiving mail at Taylor’s address, however. See, e.g., D. Costello, Breonna
2
(May 16, 2020). It further stated that the Postal Inspector, Tony Gooden, looked into the mater in
January 2020 and concluded there were no packages of interest going to Ms. Taylor’s house. Id.
11. In the wake of the public outcry over Ms. Taylor’s death, LMPD’s Public Integrity
Unit (“PIU”) conducted an investigation into what happened at Ms. Taylor’s home on March 13.
12. The Commonwealth Attorney has recused himself from deciding whether charges
should be brought against the LMPD officers involved in the shooting, however, turning that
decision over to the Kentucky Attorney General. See D. Costello, Top prosecutor recuses himself
in Breonna Taylor shooting, pursues case against boyfriend, Courier-Journal.com (May 13, 2020).
13. On May 20, 2020, Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer publicly announced that PIU had
completed its investigation and provided it to the Kentucky Attorney General, the Federal Bureau
of Investigation (“FBI”), and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky to
14. Upon information and belief, LMPD and its PIU will play no further role in
determining whether criminal charges will be brought against the LMPD officers involved in Ms.
Taylor’s death.
3
15. Two days after LMPD turned the PIU investigation over to the Attorney General,
Jefferson County Commonwealth Attorney Tom Wine held a press conference announcing the
dismissal of charges pending against Ms. Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker. See D. Costello
and A. Wolfson, Prosecutor to dismiss charges against Breonna Taylor's boyfriend, wants more
16. During that press conference, Mr. Wine publicly disclosed many aspects of the
investigation into Ms. Taylor’s death, including by playing recorded statements from Mr. Walker
and one of the officers involved (Jonathan Mattingly), as well as by disclosing a photograph that
reveals LMPD’s plans for executing the warrants on March 13. Id.
II. The Courier-Journal’s Open Records Request and Response from LMPD
17. Pursuant to Kentucky’s Open Records Act, KRS 61.870 et seq., LMPD is required
to disclose, upon request, the completed PIU investigation because it is not exempt from disclosure
18. On May 20, 2020, after Mayor Fischer publicly confirmed that LMPD had provided
the PIU investigation to the Attorney General, Courier Journal reporter Tessa Duvall submitted an
Open Records Request seeking “[a] copy of the Public Integrity Unit investigative file relating to
the March 13 shooting at 3003 Springfield/Breonna Taylor case that was provided to AG Daniel
19. The following day, LMPD responded with the very same boilerplate response that
it has used to deny many other requests seeking records related to Ms. Taylor’s death:
Your request is denied pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(h) and 17.150(2) which state
that records of law enforcement agencies are exempt from disclosure through the
provisions of the Open Records Act until such time as prosecution is completed or
declined. Turning over the PIU investigation for the Breonna Taylor case is but one
step in the investigation, which remains open and ongoing. Prematurely releasing
records for an open and ongoing investigation in a public forum could result in
4
prejudice to the potential witnesses and has the potential to adversely color a
witness’ recollection of the events. You may wish to resubmit your request after a
decision is rendered regarding prosecution and / or the PIU investigation is closed.
20. LMPD’s boilerplate response violated the Open Records law in numerous respects,
including that it (1) knowingly mischaracterizes the scope of the exemptions that it cited, which
are far narrower than LMPD suggests; (2) falsely implies that LMPD – the agency subject to this
request – is still investigating the matter when its role in the decision-making process has in fact
concluded; (3) relies on a blanket presumption that all records related to a pending investigation
may be withheld, contrary to binding Kentucky Supreme Court precedent; (4) fails to provide a
meaningful, non-boilerplate explanation of how release the records requested would harm an
ongoing investigation “in some specific and concrete way,” City of Fort Thomas v. Cincinnati
Enquirer, 406 S.W.3d 842, 856 (Ky. 2013); and (5) fails to disclose any non-exempt portions of
21. Following Mr. Wine’s press conference, Ms. Duvall sent a follow-up email to
LMPD asking them to disclose portions of the PIU report that relate to information that has now
As you know, Commonwealth’s Attorney Tom Wine hosted a news conference this
afternoon, at which he disclosed a number of pieces of evidence to the public,
including at least three audio clips from Kenneth Walker’s statements, one audio
clip from Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and a photo of the whiteboard that shows
LMPD’s plan for the warrants executed on the night of March 13.
Considering all of this was shared publicly, I am now asking that LMPD reconsider
this denial and in turn release any parts of the investigative report, or supporting
materials, that were addressed today.
See Exhibit 2.
22. To date, LMPD has not acknowledged or responded to Ms. Duvall’s email.
5
COUNT I – VIOLATION OF OPEN RECORDS ACT
23. The Courier-Journal hereby incorporates and restates the allegations set forth in
24. Under Kentucky law, the Courier-Journal is entitled to disclosure of the PIU
investigation, in the form it was transmitted to the Attorney General, FBI, and US Attorney, under
the Open Records Act as there is no applicable statutory exemption. KRS 61.870 et seq.
25. LMPD willfully violated the Open Records Act by refusing to disclose records
responsive to the Courier-Journal’s request by (1) citing inapplicable exemptions; (2) failing to
acknowledge or follow binding Kentucky Supreme Court precedent; (3) failing to offer any
meaningful explanation of how the disclosure of the document could cause harm to an ongoing
investigation in some “significant and concrete way”; and (4) failing to disclose any non-exempt
26. Pursuant to KRS 61.882(2), the Courier-Journal is entitled to seek injunctive and
other relief from LMPD’s actions with respect to its Open Records requests directly from this
Court without first seeking relief from the Attorney General under KRS 61.880.
27. Pursuant to KRS 61.882(4), this action should take precedence on this Court’s
docket over all other causes and should be assigned for hearing or trial at the earliest practicable
date.
28. Pursuant to KRS 61.882(5), the Courier-Journal is entitled to recover its costs,
reasonable attorneys’ fees from this lawsuit, and statutory penalties because the LMPD has
willfully withheld the requested records in violation of the Open Records Act.
6
WHEREFORE, the Courier-Journal respectfully requests the following relief:
1. An expedited briefing schedule and hearing on this matter at the earliest practicable
date;
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Jon L. Fleischaker
Jon L. Fleischaker
Michael P. Abate
Andrea N. Aikin
KAPLAN JOHNSON ABATE & BIRD LLP
710 West Main Street, 4th Floor
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Tel: (502) 416-1630
Fax: (502) 540-8282
jfleischaker@kplouisville.com
mabate@kplouisville.com
aaikin@kplouisville.com
7
EXHIBIT 1
8
Duvall, Tessa
Your request is denied pursuant to KRS 61.8781)(h) and 17.150(2) which state that records of law enforcement agencies
are exempt from disclosure through the provisions of the Open Records Act until such time as prosecution is completed
or declined. Turning over the PIU investigation for the Breonna Taylor case is but one step in the investigation, which
remains open and ongoing. Prematurely releasing records for an open and ongoing investigation in a public forum could
result in prejudice to the potential witnesses and has the potential to adversely color a witness’ recollection of the
events. You may wish to resubmit your request after a decision is rendered regarding prosecution and / or the PIU
investigation is closed.
Requestor Address *
525 W. Broadway
Louisville, KY 40202
United States
1
Will the Record be used for No
Commercial Purposes? *
Describe the specific record or records you wish A copy of the Public Integrity Unit investigative file relating to the March 13
to examine here or submit attachment with shooting at 3003 Springfield/Breonna Taylor case that was provided to AG
record description below: * Daniel Cameron, FBI and U.S. Attorney.
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the
recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.
2
EXHIBIT 2
9
Duvall, Tessa
Alicia,
As you know, Commonwealth’s Attorney Tom Wine hosted a news conference this afternoon, at which he disclosed a
number of pieces of evidence to the public, including at least three audio clips from Kenneth Walker’s statements, one
audio clip from Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and a photo of the whiteboard that shows LMPD’s plan for the warrants
executed on the night of March 13.
Considering all of this was shared publicly, I am now asking that LMPD reconsider this denial and in turn release any
parts of the investigative report, or supporting materials, that were addressed today.
Tessa
Tessa Duvall
Investigative and enterprise reporter
Mobile: 502.548.8872
Office: 502.582.4059
Twitter: @TessaDuvall
tduvall@courier-journal.com
Pronouns: she/her
courierjournal.com
Your request is denied pursuant to KRS 61.8781)(h) and 17.150(2) which state that records of law enforcement agencies
are exempt from disclosure through the provisions of the Open Records Act until such time as prosecution is completed
or declined. Turning over the PIU investigation for the Breonna Taylor case is but one step in the investigation, which
remains open and ongoing. Prematurely releasing records for an open and ongoing investigation in a public forum could
result in prejudice to the potential witnesses and has the potential to adversely color a witness’ recollection of the
1
events. You may wish to resubmit your request after a decision is rendered regarding prosecution and / or the PIU
investigation is closed.
Requestor Address *
525 W. Broadway
Louisville, KY 40202
United States
Describe the specific record or records you wish A copy of the Public Integrity Unit investigative file relating to the March 13
to examine here or submit attachment with shooting at 3003 Springfield/Breonna Taylor case that was provided to AG
record description below: * Daniel Cameron, FBI and U.S. Attorney.
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the
recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,