Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
47 views

Anova: Overall Conclusion: Yes, After Applying The Two Way ANOVA We Find That There Is A Difference in

A two-way ANOVA test determines the effect of two independent variables on a dependent variable. It tests for differences in the means of the dependent variable for all combinations of levels of the two independent variables as well as for interaction between the two variables. The document provides examples of two-way ANOVA analyses with different independent and dependent variables such as temperature and material type on battery life. It tests null hypotheses about no differences or interaction and reports p-values to determine whether to reject the null hypotheses.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Wajahat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views

Anova: Overall Conclusion: Yes, After Applying The Two Way ANOVA We Find That There Is A Difference in

A two-way ANOVA test determines the effect of two independent variables on a dependent variable. It tests for differences in the means of the dependent variable for all combinations of levels of the two independent variables as well as for interaction between the two variables. The document provides examples of two-way ANOVA analyses with different independent and dependent variables such as temperature and material type on battery life. It tests null hypotheses about no differences or interaction and reports p-values to determine whether to reject the null hypotheses.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Wajahat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

LAB#15

Two Way ANOVA

A two-way ANOVA test is a statistical test used to determine the effect of two nominal
predictor variables on a continuous outcome variable. ANOVA stands for analysis of variance and tests
for differences in the effects of independent variables on a dependent variable.

ANSWER OF QNO 1

1) H0 →μ72= μ72= μ73 H02→μm1=μm2 =μm3 Ho3→Interaction b/w temperature &material type isn’t

HO1→μ71≠μ72≠μ73, Ha2→μm1≠ μm2≠ μm3, Ha3→Interaction b/w temperature &material type is

2) As α is not given ,we will assume it 5%


3) Determination of p-value

4) If p<α, Ho , If p>α, reject HA


Case #1(Temperature, Battery life):
P-value =0
As P<α, Ho1 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assumed significance level (α) of 5% , data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean battery
Life change due to the change in temperature
Case #2(Material type ,Battery life)
P-value=0.002
As P<α, Ho2 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assume significance level (α) of 5% data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the
mean battery
Life changes due to the change in material type
Case#3 (Material type , temperature ,Battery life)
P-value=0.019
As P<α ,Ho2 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assumed significance level (α) of 5% , data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean battery
Life change due to the change in both the material type & temperature
Overall Conclusion: Yes , after applying the two way ANOVA we find that there is a difference in
the mean life of batteries by varying the temperature and changing the type of material.
ANSWER OF Q 2
1) H0 →μ72= μ72= μ73 H02→μm1=μm2 =μm3 Ho3→Interaction b/w Center &Dose Group isn’t

HO1→μ71≠μ72≠μ73, Ha2→μm1≠ μm2≠ μm3, Ha3→Interaction b/w Center &Dose Group is

2) As α is not given ,we will assume it 5%


3) Determination of p-value

4) If p<α, Ho , If p>α, reject HA


Case #1(Center, Dose group):
P-value =0
As P<α, Ho1 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assumed significance level (α) of 5% , data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean dose group
Life change due to the change in temperature
Case #2(Center, Dose)
P-value=0.038
As P<α, Ho2 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assume significance level (α) of 5% data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the
mean battery
Life changes due to the change in material type
Case#3 (Material type , temperature ,Battery life)
P-value=0.049
As P<α ,Ho2 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assumed significance level (α) of 5% , data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean hemoglobin
Life change due to the change in both the center type & dose
Overall Conclusion: Yes , after applying the two way ANOVA we find that there is a effect on the
hemoglobin if it is tasted individually with the center and the doses of rebligen but as it is tested
with both center and doses of rebligen altogether the hemoglobin is not effected .
ANSWER Q3

1) H0 →μ72= μ72= μ73 H02→μm1=μm2 =μm3 Ho3→Interaction b/w Center &Dose Group isn’t

HO1→μ71≠μ72≠μ73, Ha2→μm1≠ μm2≠ μm3, Ha3→Interaction b/w Center &Dose Group is

2) As α is not given ,we will assume it 5%


3) Determination of p-value

4) If p<α, Ho , If p>α, reject HA


Case #1(Cancer, Doses):
P-value =0
As P<α, Ho1 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assumed significance level (α) of 5% , data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean dose group
Life change due to the change in cancer
Case #2(Cancer, Doses)
P-value=0.038
As P<α, Ho2 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assume significance level (α) of 5% data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the
mean battery
Life changes due to the change in material type
Case#3 (Hemoglobin, cancer, Doses)
P-value=0.049
As P<α ,Ho2 will be rejected
Conclusion:
At the assumed significance level (α) of 5% , data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean hemoglobin
Life change due to the change in both the cancer type & doses
Overall Conclusion: Yes , after applying the two way ANOVA we find that there is a effect on the
hemoglobin if it is tasted individually with the center and the doses of rebligen but as it is tested
with both cancer and doses of rebligen altogether the hemoglobin is not effected .

You might also like