Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 75 views

    Solution: (1) : Item (Mpa) (Mpa) 1 120 - 80 0 2 - 120 80 0 3 93 0 - 65 4 - 90 - 15 90 5 120 75 - 75

    Uploaded by

    Wasan Shakir
    (1) The document provides the solution to a problem involving determining the factor of safety for a cast aluminum alloy under different states of plane stress using the Coulomb-Mohr failure theory. (2) Five different stress states are analyzed, with the factor of safety calculated using equations from the Coulomb-Mohr theory and estimated graphically from a failure locus plot for each state. (3) The factors of safety range from 1.225 to 1.6 depending on the specific stress values for each state.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Solution: (1) : Item (Mpa) (Mpa) 1 120 - 80 0 2 - 120 80 0 3 93 0 - 65 4 - 90 - 15 90 5 120 75 - 75

    Uploaded by

    Wasan Shakir
    75 views4 pages
    (1) The document provides the solution to a problem involving determining the factor of safety for a cast aluminum alloy under different states of plane stress using the Coulomb-Mohr failure theory. (2) Five different stress states are analyzed, with the factor of safety calculated using equations from the Coulomb-Mohr theory and estimated graphically from a failure locus plot for each state. (3) The factors of safety range from 1.225 to 1.6 depending on the specific stress values for each state.

    Original Title

    Q3 DESIGHN

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    (1) The document provides the solution to a problem involving determining the factor of safety for a cast aluminum alloy under different states of plane stress using the Coulomb-Mohr failure theory. (2) Five different stress states are analyzed, with the factor of safety calculated using equations from the Coulomb-Mohr theory and estimated graphically from a failure locus plot for each state. (3) The factors of safety range from 1.225 to 1.6 depending on the specific stress values for each state.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    75 views4 pages

    Solution: (1) : Item (Mpa) (Mpa) 1 120 - 80 0 2 - 120 80 0 3 93 0 - 65 4 - 90 - 15 90 5 120 75 - 75

    Uploaded by

    Wasan Shakir
    (1) The document provides the solution to a problem involving determining the factor of safety for a cast aluminum alloy under different states of plane stress using the Coulomb-Mohr failure theory. (2) Five different stress states are analyzed, with the factor of safety calculated using equations from the Coulomb-Mohr theory and estimated graphically from a failure locus plot for each state. (3) The factors of safety range from 1.225 to 1.6 depending on the specific stress values for each state.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Q3: A cast aluminum 195-T6 exhibits σ ut = 248 MPa,σ uc = 241 MPa, and

    ε f = 0.045. For the given state of plane stress, (a) using the Coulomb-
    Mohr theory, determine the factor of safety, (b) plot the failure locus and
    the load line, and estimate the factor of safety by graphical
    measurement.

    Item σx (MPa) σ y ( MPa) τ xy (MPa)


    1 120 -80 0
    2 -120 80 0
    3 93 0 -65
    4 -90 -15 90
    5 120 75 -75

    SOLUTION:
    (1)
    σ ut = 248 Mpa
    σ uc = 241 Mpa
    (a) σ x= 120 Mpa , σ y= − 80 Mpa
    BCM: Eq. (5-31b),
    σA σB 1
    S ut
    - S uc
    = n

    120 1
    248
    - −80
    241
    = n

    n= 1.225
    (b)
    175
    n = 145 = 1.225

    (2)
    (a) σ x= -120 Mpa , σ y= 80 Mpa
    BCM: Eq. (5-31b),
    σA σB 1
    S ut
    - S uc
    = n

    −120 80 1
    248
    - 241
    = n

    n= 1.225

    (b)
    175
    n= 145 = 1.225

    (3)
    (a) σ x= 93 Mpa , σ y= 0 Mpa
    2
    σ 1 , σ 2= σ x + σ y ± ( σ x −σ y ) + τ 2
    2 √2
    2
    xy

    σ 1 , σ 2= 93+0 ± ( 93−0 ) +(−65)2❑


    2 2 √ = 126.4 , -33.42

    BCM: Eq. (5-31b),


    σA σB 1
    S ut
    - S uc
    = n

    126.4 1
    248
    - −33.42
    241
    = n

    n= 1.54
    200
    (b) n= 130 = 1.53
    (4)
    (a) σ x= -90 Mpa , σ y= -15 Mpa
    2
    σ 1 , σ 2= σ x + σ y ± ( σ x −σ y ) + τ 2
    2 √ 2 xy

    2 2 √
    σ 1 , σ 2= −90−15 ± ( −90+15 ) +(90)2❑ = 45, -150

    BCM: Eq. (5-31c),


    S uc
    σB =-
    n
    S uc 241
    n =- = - −150 = 1.6
    σB

    (b)
    195
    n= 157 = 1.6

    (5)
    (a) σ x= 120 Mpa , σ y= 75 Mpa
    2
    σ 1 , σ 2= σ x + σ y ± ( σ x −σ y ) + τ 2
    2 √ 2 xy

    2
    σ 1 , σ 2= 120+75 ± ( 120−75 ) +(−75)2❑ =
    2 2 √ 172.6 , 22.3

    BCM: Eq. (5-31a),


    S ut
    σA = n
    S ut 248
    n = = = 1.39
    σA 172.6
    250
    (b) n= 175 = 1.39

    You might also like