6 PDF
6 PDF
Reactor Design
The types of reactors used in industry for carrying out heterogeneous catalytic reactions
may be classified in terms of relatively small numbers of categories. One simple means of
classification is in terms of relative motion of the catalyst particles and reactants.
Reactors in which the solid catalyst particles remain in a fixed position relative to one
another (fixed bed, trickle bed and moving bed reactors).
Reactors in which the particles are suspended in a fluid and are constantly moving about
(fluidized bed and slurry reactors).
The catalyst constituting the fixed bed will generally be employed in one of the
following configurations:
The packing itself may consist of spherical, cylindrical or randomly shaped pellets, weir
screens or gauzes, crushed particles or a variety of other physical configurations. The particles
usually are 0.25 to 1.0 cm in diameter. The structure of the catalyst pellets is such that the
internal surface area far exceeds the superficial (external) surface area so that the contact area is
in principle, independent of pellet size. To make effective use of the internal surface area, one
must use a pellet size that minimizes diffusional resistance with in the catalyst pellet but that also
gives rise to an appropriate pressure drop across the catalyst bed.
The most commonly used direction of reactant. Flow is down ward through the bed. This
approach gives a stable bed that will not fluidize, dance or lift out of the reactor. This approach
minimizes catalyst attrition and potential entrainment of catalyst fines. When processing
conditions are such that the reactor is subjected to wide variations in feed flow rates or when the
feed is a dense fluid, it is imperative that the flow direction be downward. The attendant
advantages of-downward flow is the tendency of bed to compress itself and the gravitation of
catalyst fines (resulting from attrition) down through the bed. Both phenomena may lead to
increased pressure drop and channeling or mal distribution of the flow. Up flow has the
advantage of lifting catalyst fines or fragmented particles from the bed there by avoiding
channeling and blockage of bed. However, this mode of operation is disadvantageous because it
may lead to unstable beds at high flow rates. It leads to dancing in a pulsating flow that caused
catalyst abrasion and in unusual circumstances may lead to fluidization.
A fixed bed reactor has many unique and value able advantages relative to other reactor
types. One of its prime attributes is its simplicity, with the attendant consequence of low costs for
construction, operation and maintenance relative to moving bed or fluidized bed operation. It
requires a minimum of auxiliary equipment and is particularly appropriate for use in small
commercial units when investments of large sums for control, catalyst handling and supporting
facilities would be economically prohibitive-. Another major advantage of this mode of
operation is implicit in "fixed bed reactor" is that there are no problems in separating the catalyst
from the reactor effluent stream. In many fluidized bed systems catalyst recovery can be quite
troublesome and require substantial equipment costs. Another important attribute of fixed bed
reactors is the wide variation in space times at which they can be operated. This flexibility is
extremely important in situations where one is likely to encounter wide variations in the quantity
or quality of the feed stock to be processed. For example high temperatures or high pressure
reactions employing solid catalyst, economic considerations usually dictate that the process
becomes commercially viable only when a fixed bed reactor is employed.
For economical production of large amounts of product, fixed bed reactors are usually the
first choice, particularly for gas-phase reactions. Many catalyzed gaseous reactions are amenable
to long catalyst life (1-10 years); and as the time between catalyst changes outs increases,
annualized replacement costs decline dramatically, largely due to savings in shutdown costs. It is
not surprising, therefore, that fixed-bed reactors now dominate the scene in large-scale chemical-
product manufacture.
Fixed-bed reactors may also be classified into two major categories according to the heat
requirements:
» Adiabatic fixed bed reactors
» Non-adiabatic fixed bed reactors
Moderately exothermic or
Mild hydrogenation
Single adiabatic bed endothermic non-equilibrium
limited
Radial flow and useful where change Styrene from ethyl benzene
in moles is large
Many hydrogenations
Highly endothermic or
Ethylene oxidation to
Multi-tabular exothermic reactions requiring
ethylene oxide, formaldehyde
non-adiabatic close temperature control to
by methanol oxidation,
ensure high selectivity phathalic anhydride
production
Because of the necessity of removing or adding heat, it may not be possible to use a single large-
diameter tube packed with catalyst. In this event the reactor may be built up of a number of tubes
encased in a single body as illustrated in figure. The energy exchange with the surroundings is
obtained by circulating, or perhaps boiling, a fluid in the space between the tubes. If the heat
effect is large, each catalyst tube must be small (tubes as small as 1.0 in. diameter are widely
used) in order to prevent excessive temperatures within the reaction mixture. A disadvantage of
this method of cooling is that the rate of heat transfer to the fluid surrounding the tubes is about
the same all along the tube length, but the major share of the reaction usually takes place near the
entrance. For example, in an exothermic reaction the rate will be relatively large at the entrance
to the reactor tube owing to the high concentrations of reactants existing there. It will become
even higher as the reaction mixture moves a short distance into the tube, because the heat
liberated by the high rate of reaction is greater than that which can be transferred to the cooling
fluid. Hence the temperature of the reaction mixture will rise, causing an increase in the rate of
reaction. This continues as the mixture moves up the tube, until the disappearance of reactants
has a larger effect on the rate than the increase in temperature. Farther along the tube the rate will
decrease. The smaller amount of heat can now be removed through the wall with the result that
the temperature decreases. This situation leads to a maximum in the curve of temperature versus
reactor-tube length.
2-3. The largest difference will occur at lower Reynolds numbers. Most catalyst carriers have
low conductivities, but some such as carbides have high conductivities.
Reaction Phase:
Reactions are occurring in gaseous phase at 340oC and 202kPa in the presence
catalyst of NiO-MoO3 supported on alumina
Reaction Kinetics:
Weight of catalyst:
On the basis of reaction
[( ) ]
Where,
[( ) ]
W = 3670.18 kgcat
= 3.058 m3
Reactor Volume:
Reactor volume can be calculated as:
Vr = Vcat / (1 - )
= 3.058 / (1 - 0.4)
= 5.097 m3
Reactor Geometry:
Assuming tube length of 2.5 m and taking the diameter of tube to prevent
deviation from plug flow assumption. Dt/Dp > 10‡
Where,
Dt = diameter of tube
Dp = diameter of particle
Tube Dimensions:
Tube outside diameter do = 60.45 mm
⁄
So, = 5.097 / ( /4 x 0.052502 x 2.5)
= 940
P = 1.25do
So, P = 0.07556 m
√[ ]
So, ND = 35
Di PND 1
Shell Height:
Length of tube = 2.5 m
= 3.5 m
ΔP 1 φ G 1501 φ μ
3 1.75G
L φ DPρf g c DP
gc = 9.80 m/sec2
L = length = 2.50 m
= 2.039 m2
Cooling media
Temperature difference, ΔT = 20 K
Q = m.Cp.ΔT
677093.4 = m x 4.18 x 20
⁄ [ ]
Ac = 3.11 m2
Equivalent Diameter:
[ ⁄ ⁄ ]
[ ]
⁄ ⁄
= 0.879 m
Shell side mass velocity = water flow rate / shell side flow area
= 2.23 / 3.11
GDe
Reynolds Number Re
= 315.23
Where
Gs = 59459.8 lb/ft2/hr
= 1
Shell Side:
Where,
Assuming, = 1
So,
Wall Resistance:
( ⁄ )
Where,
Tube Side:
0.7 Dp
hi D DpG 4.6
3.5 e D
k μ
k = 0.497 W/m-K
Dp = diameter of particle = 5 mm
hi = 293.92 W/m2-K
Ui = 210.8 W/m2-K
LMTD = 87.1 oC
= 372.45 m2
Reactor