Effect of Chromium (VI) On Bacterial Kinetics of Heterotrophic Biomass of Activated Sludge
Effect of Chromium (VI) On Bacterial Kinetics of Heterotrophic Biomass of Activated Sludge
Effect of Chromium (VI) On Bacterial Kinetics of Heterotrophic Biomass of Activated Sludge
Abstract
The effect of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), on the maximum specific growth rate, mm and biomass yield, YH ; of
heterotrophic biomass was studied in batch tests conducted under high (=10) and low (=1.5) substrate-to-biomass
ratios ðS0 =X0 Þ: The effects of sludge age and biomass acclimatization to Cr(VI) on the bacterial kinetics were also
studied. The mm values were determined by measuring oxygen uptake rate (OUR) and volatile suspended solids (VSS)
increase. Cr(VI) concentrations equal or greater than 10 mg l1 inhibited the growth of unacclimatized activated sludge
and caused a significant decrease in mm and YH values. The acclimatization of biomass and the selection of a high
operating sludge age reduced the inhibitory effect of Cr(VI). At a sludge age of 20 days, Cr(VI) concentrations of
o10 mg l1 stimulated bacterial growth as evidenced by an increase in both the mm and YH values. Determining mm
values by OUR and VSS methods, revealed that the presence of Cr(VI) in unacclimatized biomass caused an inhibitory
effect mostly on substrate oxidation, while in acclimatized biomass, anabolic pathways were inhibited more. r 2002
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Toxicity; Cr(VI); Activated sludge; Bacterial kinetics; Batch methods; S0 =X0 ratio
0043-1354/02/$ - see front matter r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 4 3 - 1 3 5 4 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 1 8 - 0
3342 A.S. Stasinakis et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 3341–3349
substrate removal determined in batch reactors. This observed a continuous decrement of mm in the presence
discrepancy may be attributed to culture history of the of 2–11 mg l1 Cr(VI).
microorganisms [8], the parameter identifiability [9] and These controversial results on the effect of Cr(VI)
the nature of kinetic assay [10]. Under high substrate-to- could be attributed to the fact that the impact of heavy
biomass ratios ðS0 =X0 Þ; fast grown bacteria appeared to metals and other toxic compounds on activated sludge is
gain a competitive advantage, resulting in higher mm influenced by several factors such as the sludge age ðyc Þ
values than those obtained under low S0 =X0 [10,11], an [21–23], the acclimatization of biomass to the toxic
observation consistent with ‘‘r’’ strategist microorga- compound [18,24], the concentration of suspended solids
nisms [12]. Moreover, it was proposed that the oxygen [5], the species of microorganisms presented in activated
uptake rate (OUR)-based estimate of mm ðmmðOURÞ Þ is a sludge [25] and the exposure time of biomass to the toxic
measure of substrate oxidation and under certain compound [22,3].
circumstances is differentiated from mm determined by These controversial results lead us to undertake the
measuring exponential bacterial growth ðmmðVSSÞ Þ current research. Thus, the purpose of this study was to
[13,14,11]. investigate the toxic effects of Cr(VI) on the bacterial
The data presented in the literature describing the kinetics of heterotrophic biomass (maximum specific
Cr(VI) toxicity effects on activated sludge process and growth rate, mm ; and biomass yield, YH ) and to estimate
specifically on substrate removal, respiration activity the effect of acclimatization of biomass and sludge age
and bacterial growth, are often controversial. Early on observed toxicity. For this reason, experiments were
works by Barth et al. [15] and Moore et al. [16] on conducted with Cr(VI) acclimatized and unacclimatized
substrate removal supported that aerobic biological biomass, grown at various sludge ages that ranged from
treatment processes could tolerate, without significant 2.5 to 20 days. Based on our previous study [11], values
loss in treatment efficiency, Cr(VI) concentrations in the of mm were obtained from oxygen uptake (OUR) and
range of 10–50 mg l1. Moreover, Moore et al. [16] biomass growth (volatile suspended solids (VSS)) in
showed that at concentration of 5 mg l1 Cr(VI), the unit batch tests conducted at high S0 =X0 (=10) and low
performed better than the control reactor. However, S0 =X0 (=1.5) ratios in order to evaluate the sensitivity
Lamb and Tollefson [5] reported that shock loading of a of different methods to assess Cr(VI) toxicity and to
completely mixed activated sludge system with 5 mg l1 estimate the effect of Cr(VI) on substrate oxidation and
CrO24 reduced organic substrate removal by 50%. bacterial growth.
Literature data on biomass respiration activity are also
contradictory. Vankova et al. [3] reported that the 1-h
EC50 value was in the range of 40–90 mg l1, whereas 2. Materials and methods
Madoni et al. [17] reported that 1 h exposure of activated
sludge to 100 mg l1 Cr(VI) (as initial concentration) 2.1. Activated sludge cultivation
reduced the OUR only by 21.5%. Gokcay and Yetis [18]
and Yetis et al. [19] showed that an acclimatized sludge Four parallel 10 l sequencing batch reactors (SBRs)
was stimulated in the presence of Cr(VI) and observed were used to simulate activated sludge process and to
an approximately two times increase in mm value and provide biomass for evaluating bacterial kinetics.
stimulatory effects on biomass yield in the presence of Activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment
25 mg l1 Cr(VI). On the contrary, Mazierski [20] plant (Plomari, Lesvos) was used to seed the reactors.
A.S. Stasinakis et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 3341–3349 3343
Inhibition (%)
observed not only for Cr(VI) concentration of 1 mg l1
40
but also for 10 mg l1. Further increase of Cr(VI)
concentration decreased the YH value below the value 20
Table 4
Values of maximum specific growth rate, mmðOURÞ and mmðVSSÞ that were obtained in batch tests with S0 =X0 =10
yc ¼ 20 days yc ¼ 10 days yc ¼ 5 days yc ¼ 2:5 days yc ¼ 20 days yc ¼ 10 days yc ¼ 5 days yc ¼ 2:5 days
Unacclimatized biomass
0 1.06 2.05 2.84 3.46 0.96 1.73 1.83 1.80
1 1.77 1.79 2.46 3.10 1.57 1.71 1.63 1.25
10 0.46 1.17 0.53 1.70 1.12 1.04 0.59 0.78
25 0a 0a 0a 0a 0.69 0.36 0.22 0.16
Acclimatized biomass
1 1.95 1.44 3.04 2.95 1.09 0.93 1.76 1.29
10 1.82 0.76 1.92 0b 1.17 0.61 0.86 0b
25 0.4 0.72 0.95 0b 0.33 0.46 0.48 0b
a
Activated sludge growth was completely inhibited as indicated by a zero increase in OUR values.
b
SBRs failed and neither mmðOURÞ nor mmðVSSÞ could be determined.
100
80
Inhibition (%) of µm(VSS)
60
40
20
0
-20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-40
-60
-80
Cr(VI) (ppm)
Fig. 2. Cr(VI) toxicity in unacclimatized biomass expressed as proportional reduction of mmðVSSÞ (% inhibition) at various sludge ages
and at S0 =X0 ¼ 10:
3346 A.S. Stasinakis et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 3341–3349
100
80
-40
-60
-80
-100
Cr(VI) (ppm)
Fig. 3. Cr(VI) toxicity in acclimatized biomass expressed as proportional reduction of mmðOURÞ (% inhibition) at various sludge ages
and at S0 =X0 ¼ 10:
2 100
1.8
1.6 non-acclimated biomass 80
60
1.2
1
40 θc=10 days, µm(OUR)
0.8
θc=10 days, µm(VSS)
0.6 θc=5 days, µm(OUR)
20
0.4 θc=5 days, µm(VSS)
0.2
0
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Cr(VI) (ppm)
Cr(VI) (ppm)
Fig. 5. Comparison of inhibition on values of mmðOURÞ 2mmðVSSÞ
Fig. 4. Effect of acclimatization on mmðVSSÞ values for sludge in the presence of Cr(VI) for unacclimatized biomass (sludge
age of 5 days (batch tests with So =Xo ¼ 10). age of 5 and 10 days) determined by batch tests conducted at
S0 =X0 ¼ 10:
3). The above effect of sludge age has been reported by In this study, comparison of chromium toxicity
several researchers [31,32,22] and can be attributed to determined via experiments with acclimatized and
the higher amount of extracellular polymers excreted by unacclimatized biomass showed that the acclimatized
activated sludge at long yc that tend to adsorb inhibitors microorganisms are less sensitive in the presence of
[21,24] rendering them unavailable to bacteria. chromium than unacclimatized ones (Fig. 4). This
According to the literature the effect of biomass phenomenon is probably due to the fact that during
acclimatization to hexavalent chromium has been acclimatization, resistant microorganisms are selected
mostly studied by determining the kinetic parameters and/or microorganisms are adapted metabolically to the
in experiments with acclimatized biomass and not in heavy metal concentration. According to the hypothesis
parallel experiments, where acclimatized and unaccli- of metabolic adaptation, the metal ion-damaged en-
matized biomass is used simultaneously [18,19]. Only zymes are replaced by new enzyme synthesis or new
Gokcay and Dilek [33] conducted parallel experiments shunt pathways are created to substitute the inoperative
at Cr(VI) concentrations of 1 and 50 mg l1 and reported ones [34,18]. The above effect of acclimatization was not
that the effect of Cr(VI) was two times higher in cultures observed at a sludge age of 10 days, where Cr(VI)
seeded with unacclimatized biomass. toxicity appeared to be approximately the same for
A.S. Stasinakis et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 3341–3349 3347
100
80
60
Inhibition (%) 40
20
0
-20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-40
-60
-80
-100
Cr(VI) (ppm)
Fig. 6. Comparison of inhibition on values of mmðOURÞ 2mmðVSSÞ in the presence of Cr(VI) for acclimatized biomass (sludge age of 5 and
20 days) determined by batch tests conducted at S0 =X0 ¼ 10:
100
80
60
40
Inhibition (%)
20
0
-20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-40
-60
-80
-100
Cr(VI) (ppm)
Fig. 7. Comparison of inhibition on values of mmðOURÞ 2mmðourÞ in the presence of Cr(VI) for acclimatized biomass (sludge age of 2.5, 5
and 20 days) determined by batch tests conducted at S0 =X0 ¼ 10 and S0 =X0 ¼ 1:5:
acclimatized and unacclimatized bacteria. This behavior acclimatized biomass. According to Stasinakis et al.
of acclimatized biomass was attributed to insufficient [11] mmðOURÞ provides information on oxygen consump-
biomass acclimatization period (15 days). tion and substrate oxidation by bacteria, while mmðVSSÞ is
Cr(VI) toxicity evaluated by the OUR ðmmðOURÞ Þ and related to microbial growth. Pollard et al. [13,14]
VSS ðmmðVSSÞ Þ methods is illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6. The underlined the importance of developing novel methods
results revealed that in the case of unacclimatized to describe bacterial growth that can differentiate from
biomass, the OUR method appears to exhibit a higher the bacterial metabolic activities determined by the
negative effect on growth rates than the VSS method, OUR method. Therefore the results of our study
while the opposite was observed in the case of indicate that the presence of Cr(VI) in unacclimatized
3348 A.S. Stasinakis et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 3341–3349
biomass inhibits more catabolic activities, whereas in Batch experiments conducted at low S0 =X0 appeared
acclimatized biomass Cr(VI) is causing a greater to be a sensitive method for evaluating Cr(VI) toxicity
decrease in bacterial growth. only in cases that acclimatized biomass is used. The
insensitivity of this method for evaluating inhibition in
3.2.3. Comparison of mm determined at low and high unacclimatized biomass is probably due to the short
S0 =X0 ratios contact time between biomass and the toxic compound.
Fig. 7 illustrates that for acclimatized biomass mmðourÞ Determining mm values by OUR, at high and low
values determined at high S0 =X0 ratios ðS0 =X0 ¼ 10Þ are substrate-to-biomass ratios, showed that fast growing
influenced less by Cr(VI) than mmðOURÞ values deter- bacteria appeared to be less sensitive to chromium
mined at low S0 =X0 ratios ðS0 =X0 ¼ 1:5Þ: High S0 =X0 toxicity than the original bacterial culture. Further
ratios tend to support cell multiplication and favor the investigation is needed to evaluate the effect of substrate
bacterial species growing faster. Therefore, kinetic oxidation on Cr(VI) reduction to the less toxic Cr(III),
constants determined at high S0 =X0 reflect the char- which may also affect the evaluation of Cr(VI) toxicity.
acteristics of the culture developed at the end of the Batch experiments conducted with unacclimatized
batch assay and less the original culture. On the other and acclimatized biomass illustrated that the presence
hand, at low S0 =X0 ratio no significant cell replication of Cr(VI) in unacclimatized biomass inhibits more
occurs as storage phenomena prevail and therefore the catabolic activities, whereas in acclimatized biomass
obtained kinetic constants are more representative of the Cr(VI) causes a greater decrease in bacterial growth.
original culture [10,35,11]. Thus the results indicate that
fast growing microorganisms seem to be less sensitive to
hexavalent chromium than the initial activated sludge Acknowledgements
biocenosis.
However, two more alternative explanations should A.S. Stasinakis would like to thank the Greek
be considered. High S0 =X0 ratio could promote the Scholarship Foundation for financial support of this
higher production of biomass at the end of the work. The authors would also like to thank Mrs. Anna
experiment, thus extracellular polymers could be present Vassalou and Mrs. Eustathia Nakou for their valuable
at higher concentrations, leading to a lower bioavail- help during the experiments.
ability of inhibitors. Moreover, it should also be taken
into account that Cr(VI) reduction to the less toxic
Cr(III) may occur during oxidation of organic matter.
References
Shen and Wang [36], based on experiments with pure
cultures, reported that the substrate concentration [1] Martell AE. Chemistry of carcinogenic metals. Environ
affects Cr(VI) reduction by microrganisms and insuffi- Health Perspect 1981;40:207–26.
cient carbon sources limited the rate of Cr(VI) reduc- [2] Strotmann U, Zaremba S, Bias WR. Rapid toxicity tests
tion. In experiments with high S0 =X0 ratios (=10), the for the determination of substance toxicity to activated
substrate concentration is significantly higher than that sludge. Acta Hydrochim Hydriobiol 1992;20:136–42.
of experiments with S0 =X0 ¼ 1:5: Thus, it is possible [3] Vankova S, Kupec J, Hoffmann J. Toxicity of chromium
that Cr(VI) reduction may be occurring at a higher rate to activated sludge. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1999;42:16–21.
during experiments with high S0 =X0 ratios. The reduc- [4] Harper SC, Manoharan R, Mavinic DS, Randall CW.
tion of Cr(VI) in activated sludge and the effect of Chromium and nickel toxicity during the biotreatment of
high ammonia landfill leachate. Water Environ Res
substrate oxidation are the subject of our future studies.
1996;68:19–24.
[5] Lamb A, Tollefson EL. Toxic effects of cupric, chromate
and chromic ions on biological oxidation. Water Res
4. Conclusions 1973;7:599–613.
[6] Dilek FB, Gokcay CF. Microbiology of activated sludge
The experimental results presented in this study treating wastewater containing Ni(II) and Cr(VI). Water
showed that sludge age, acclimatization of biomass Sci Technol 1996;34(5–6):183–91.
and S0 =X0 significantly influence Cr(VI) toxicity. Ope- [7] Cabrero A, Fernandez S, Mirada F, Garcia J. Effects of
rating at high sludge age values and acclimatization of copper and zinc on the activated sludge bacteria growth
biomass can reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, determined by mm kinetics. Water Res 1998;32:1355–62.
[8] Templeton LL, Grady Jr. CPL. Effect of culture history on
and YH values. Moreover, for sludge age of 20 days,
the determination of biodegradation kinetics by batch and
concentrations of Cr(VI) up to 10 mg l1 stimulated the fed-batch techniques. J Water Pollut Control Fed
maximum growth rate and the biomass yield of the 1988;60:651–8.
culture. This could be attributed to an increase in [9] Grady JCP, Smets BF, Barbeau DS. Variability in kinetic
metabolic activity of bacteria in the presence of low parameters; a review of the possible causes and proposed
Cr(VI) concentrations. terminology. Water Res 1996;30:742–8.
A.S. Stasinakis et al. / Water Research 36 (2002) 3341–3349 3349
[10] Chudoba P, Capdeville B, Chudoba J. Explanation of [24] Neufeld RD, Hermann ER. Heavy metal removal by
biological meaning of S0/X0 ratio in batch cultivation. acclimated activated sludge. J Water Pollut Control Fed
Water Sci Technol 1992;26:743–51. 1975;47:310–29.
[11] Stasinakis AS, Mamais D, Paraskevas PA, Lekkas TD. [25] Shuttleworth KL, Unz RF. Influence of metals and metal
Evaluation of different methods for the determination of speciation on the growth of filamentous bacteria. Water
maximum heterotrophic growth rate in activated sludge Res 1991;25:1177–86.
systems. Water Environ Res, 2001, submitted for publica- [26] APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water
tion. and wastewater, 17th ed. Washington, DC: American
[12] Atlas RM, Bartha R. Microbial ecology: fundamentals Public Health Association, 1989.
and applications. New York: Addison Wesley Longman [27] Ekama GA, Dold PL, Marais GvR. Procedures for
Inc., 1997. determining influent COD fractions and the maximum
[13] Pollard PC, Staib CI, Greenfield PF. Measurements of specific growth rate of heterotrophs in activated sludge.
bacterial specific growth rates in toxic industrial (coke Water Sci Technol 1986;18:91–114.
oven) wastewater. Resource Environ Biotechnol [28] Kappeler J, Gujer W. Estimation of kinetic parameters of
1998;2:73–91. heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and
[14] Pollard PC, Steffens MA, Biggs CA, Lant PA. Bacterial characterization of wastewater for activated sludge. Water
growth dynamics in activated sludge batch assays. Water Sci Technol 1992;26:125–39.
Res 1998;32:587–96. [29] Sollfrank U, Gujer W. Characterisation of domestic
[15] Barth EF, Ettinger MG, Salotto BV, Mc Dermott GN. wastewater for mathematical modelling of the activated
Summary report on the effects of heavy metals on the sludge process. Water Sci Technol 1991;23:1057–66.
biological treatment processes. J Water Pollut Control Fed [30] Bagby MM, Sherrard JH. Combined effects of Cd and Ni
1965;37:86–96. on the activated sludge process. J Water Pollut Control
[16] Moore WA, Mc Dermott GN, Post MA, Ettinger MB. Fed 1981;53:1609–19.
Effects of chromium on the activated sludge process. [31] Beyenal NY, Ozbelge TA, Ozbelge HO. Combined effect
J Water Pollut Control Fed 1961;33:54–72. of Cu and Zn on activated sludge process. Water Res
[17] Madoni P, Davoli D, Guglielmi L. Response of SOUR 1997;31:699–704.
and AUR to heavy metal contamination in activated [32] Lombrana JI, Varona F, Mijanos F. Biokinetic behavior
sludge. Water Res 1999;33:2459–64. and settling characteristics in an activated sludge under the
[18] Gokcay CF, Yetis U. Effect of chromium(VI) on activated effect of toxic Ni II influents. Water Air Soil Pollut
sludge. Water Res 1991;25:65–73. 1993;69:57–68.
[19] Yetis U, Demirer GN, Gokcay CF. Effect of chromium [33] Gokcay CF, Dilek FB. Effects of nickel, chromium and
(VI) on the biomass yield of activated sludge. Enzyme initial feed concentration on the batch growth of a
Microbial Technol 1999;25:48–54. microbial consortium developed from sewage. Environ
[20] Mazierski J. Effect of chromium Cr(VI) on the growth rate Technol 1991;12:1–11.
of activated sludge bacteria. Water Res 1995;29:1479–82. [34] Chang SY, Huang JC, Liu YC. Effects of Cd(II) and
[21] Battistoni P, Fava G, Ruello ML. Heavy metal shock load Cu(II) on a biofilm system. J Environ Eng ASCE
in activated sludge uptake and toxic effects. Water Res 1986;112:94–104.
1993;27:821–7. [35] Novak L, Larrea L, Wanner J. Estimation of maximum
[22] Stasinakis AS, Thomaidis NS, Lekkas TD. Toxicity of specific growth rate of heterotrophic and autotrophic
organotin compounds to activated sludge. Ecotoxicol biomass: a combined technique of mathematical modelling
Environ Saf 2001;49:275–80, doi:10.1006/eesa.2000.2061. and batch cultivations. Water Sci Technol 1994;30:171–80.
[23] Sujarittanonta S, Sherrard JH. Activated sludge nickel [36] Shen H, Wang YT. Biological reduction of chromium by
toxicity studies. J Water Pollut Control Fed 1981;53: E. coli. J Environ Eng ASCE 1994;120:560–72.
1314–22.