Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

PD 1529 Section 108 Jurisprudence

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Section 108 of P.D. No.

1529 reads as follows:


Section 108. Amendment and alteration of certificates. – No erasure, alteration, or
amendment shall be made upon the registration book after the entry of a certificate of
title or of a memorandum thereon and the attestation of the same by the Register of
Deeds, except by order of the proper Court of First Instance. A registered owner or
other person having interest in the registered property, or, in proper cases, the Register
of Deeds with the approval of the Commissioner of Land Registration, may apply by
petition to the court upon the ground that the registered interest of any description,
whether vested, contingent, expectant or inchoate appearing on the certificate, have
terminated and ceased; or that new interest not appearing upon the certificate have
arisen or been created; or that an omission or an error was made in entering a
certificate or any memorandum thereon, or on any duplicate certificate: or that the
same or any person in the certificate has been changed or that the registered owner has
married, or, if registered as married, that the marriage has been terminated and no
right or interest of heirs or creditors will thereby be affected; or that a corporation
which owned registered land and has been dissolved has not yet convened the same
within three years after its dissolution; or upon any other reasonable ground; and the
court may hear and determine the petition after notice to all parties in interest, and
may order the entry or cancellation of a new certificate, the entry or cancellation of a
memorandum upon a certificate, or grant any other relief upon such terms and
conditions, requiring security and bond if necessary, as it may consider
proper;Provided, however, That this section shall not be construed to give the court
authority to reopen the judgment or decree of registration, and that nothing shall be
done or ordered by the court which shall impair the title or other interest of a
purchaser holding a certificate for value and in good faith, or his heirs and assigns
without his or their written consent. Where the owner’s duplicate certificate is not
presented, a similar petition may be filed as provided in the preceding section.
All petitions or motions filed under this section as well as any other provision of this
decree after original registration shall be filed and entitled in the original case in
which the decree of registration was entered.
Based on the provision, the proceeding for the amendment and alteration of a
certificate of title under Section 108 of P.D. No. 1529 is applicable in seven
instances or situations, namely: (a) when registered interests of any description,
whether vested, contingent, expectant, or inchoate, have terminated and ceased; (b)
when new interests have arisen or been created which do not appear upon the
certificate; (c) when any error, omission or mistake was made in entering a
certificate or any memorandum thereon or on any duplicate certificate; (d) when
the name of any person on the certificate has been changed; (e) when the registered
owner has been married, or, registered as married, the marriage has been
terminated and no right or interest of heirs or creditors will thereby be affected; (f)
when a corporation, which owned registered land and has been dissolved, has not
conveyed the same within three years after its dissolution; and (g) when there is
reasonable ground for the amendment or alteration of title.[8]
We agree with both the CA and the RTC that the petitioner was in reality
seeking the reconveyance of the property covered by OCT No. 684, not the
cancellation of a certificate of title as contemplated by Section 108 of P.D. No.
1529. Thus, his petition did not fall under any of the situations covered by Section
108, and was for that reason rightly dismissed.

You might also like