500 687 1 SM PDF
500 687 1 SM PDF
500 687 1 SM PDF
Abstract:
Functional Grammar describes grammar in functional terms in which a
language is interpreted as a system of meanings. The language system consists of
three macro-functions known as meta-functional components: the interpersonal
function, the ideational function, and the textual function, all of which make a
contribution to the structure of a text. The concepts discussed in Functional
Grammar aims at giving contribution to the understanding of a text and
evaluation of a text, which can be applied for text analysis. Using the concepts
in Functional Grammar, English teachers may help the students learn how
various grammatical features and grammatical systems are used in written texts
so that they can read and write better.
Key Words:
Functional Grammar, meta-functional components
language is sign which is arbitrary. And language and not with the deeper
parole or speech is the individual functional levels of meaning constructed
manifestation, a part of social system. from social interaction. In functional
But he was not prepared to take context orientation, functions are essentially the
of language use into account in the purposes that we accomplish with
2
elaboration of his theory. The other language, e.g., stating, requesting,
dominant formal theory is responding, greeting, parting, etc.
transformational generative grammar However, forms of language are needed
proposed by Chomsky. His main to accomplish functions. Forms are the
concern is a speaker’s knowledge of outward manifestation of language and
grammar (linguistic competence), that functions are the realization of those
the abstract outlines of the rules systems forms.4 The theme unifying the functional
are part of a human being’s genetic approach is the belief that language
3
endowment. For Chomsky, human must be studied in relation to its role in
beings have the ability to produce and human communication.
understand an infinite number of The British linguist, J.B. Firth,5
sentences, none of which had ever been opening the door for the study of
uttered before. language function, suggested that
Ferdinand de Saussure’s linguistic linguistics at all levels of analysis be
theory and Chomsky’s are considered to concerned with meaningful human
have influenced a lot in the theory of behavior in society. He derived his
language teaching and learning, e.g. in theory of ‘context of situation’ from
the grammar-translation method and Malinowski, who believes that meaning
also audio-lingual method, producing a comes not from a passive contemplation
structural syllabus, giving top priority to of the word, but from an analysis of its
the teaching of grammar or structure of functions, with reference to the given
the language. culture. Malinowski and Firth represent a
The formal orientation seems to view of language as context-dependent
neglect the context in which language is and sociological in orientation, as
used. The rules proposed by the opposed to a more internal view in which
structuralists were considered abstract, language is a self-contained system. As
formal, explicit, and quite logical, but we know human beings do not
they concerned with the forms of communicate with each other in a
vacuum, but rather in a socio-culturally
2 defined activities and situation in which
Yalden, Janice. 1987. The
Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design, and
Implementation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
4
International. Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of
3
Foley, William A. & van Valin, Roberrt D. Language Learning and Teaching. New York:
1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
5
Cambridge University Press. Ibid
and produce bits of language that make sets of semantic choice. (1) Theme
sense. So a functional grammar is structures express the organization of
essentially a ‘natural’ grammar, in the the message: how the clauses relates to
sense that everything in it can be the surrounding discourse, and to the
explained by reference to how language context of situation in which it is being
is used. The relationship between the produced; (2) Mood structures express
meaning and the wording (grammar) is interactional meaning: what the clause is
not, however, an arbitrary one: the form doing, as a verbal exchange between
of the grammar relates naturally to the speaker-writer and audience; (3)
meanings that are being encoded. Transitivity structures express
Furthermore, the fundamental representational meaning: what the
components of meaning in language are clause is about, which is typically some
functional components, called process, with associated participants
metafunctional components consisting of and circumstances. These three sets of
ideational or reflective, interpersonal or options together determine the structural
active, and textual. The first two underlie shape of the clause.
all uses of language: (1) to understand
the environment (ideational), and (2) to THEME: CLAUSE AS MESSAGE
act on the others in it (interpersonal), The system of Theme belongs to
and the textual breathes relevance into the textual metafunction of the language.
the other two. In the third sense, each The Theme functions in the structure of
element in a language is explained by the clause as a message. The Theme is
reference to its function in the total the element which serves as the point of
linguistic system. A functional grammar departure of the message. It is
combines all the units of a language – its concerned with the organization of
clauses, phrases and soon. information within individual clauses.
Halliday’s main purposes of his The following examples show that ‘the
functional grammar are a contribution to same’ clause-sized piece of information
the understanding of the text: the embody alternative Theme choices.
linguistic analysis enables one to show Your reporter repeatedly interrupted her
how, and why, the text means what it replies.
does, and a contribution to the Her replies were repeatedly interrupted
evaluation of the text: the linguistic by your reporter.
analysis may enable one to say why the Repeatedly, your reporter interrupted her
text is, or is not, an effective text for its replies.
own purposes.
The three metafunctional
components proposed by Halliday serve
to express three largely independent
the Subject like the following examples: adverb. It provides the speaker’s
comment, assessment or attitude toward
the message, for example:
neg. attributive
Mood Residue
Complement
A second component of the
residue is the complement. A Adjunct
complement is defined as non-essential A third component of the Residue
participant in the clause. It can be is the Adjunct. It is a clause element
identified as an element within the which contributes some additional
residue that has a potential of being information to the clause. Adjuncts can
Subject. It can be subject through the be identified as elements which do not
process of making the clause passive. have the potential to become Subject.
They are not nominal elements, but
adverbial, or prepositional like the
Charles wrote ‘Oliver
following examples:
Dickens Twist’.
The old man died yesterday.
Subject Finite Predicator Complem
I learnt the dance from my aunt.
ent
Mood Residue
WH- interrogative, Exlamative, and
Imperative Clauses
WH-element is always linked to
‘Oliver was written By
one or another of the three functions
Twist’ Charles
Subject, Complement, Adjunct. If it is
Dickens
linked to the Subject, it is part of the
Subject Finite Predicator Adjunct
Mood element, and if it linked to a
Mood Residue
Complement or Adjunct it becomes part
of the Residue.
The complement is typically a
nominal group. It can also be a whole who killed John Lennon
clause. There is a particular sub-class of Subject/ (past) kill Complement
12 13
The examples can be seen from the The examples can be seen from the
following table 3. following table 2.
sensed – felt, thought, or seen. This can abstraction; they are related symbolically
be any kind of entity entertained or and reversible.14
created by consciousness – a conscious Attributive and identifying modes
being, an object, a substance, an have each own characteristics. There
institution, or an abstraction, but not only are four characteristics of attributive
such things but also acts. clauses which distinguish them from
Grammatically, a wide range of units can identifying ones: (1) the nominal group
serve as Phenomenon. In the following functioning as Attribute is typically
examples the Phenomenon is indefinite: either an adjective or a
underlined: common noun. It cannot be a proper
The man knew too much. noun or a pronoun; (2) the verb realizing
Her tasks interested her. the Process is one of the ‘ascriptive’
I like swimming early in the morning. classes, for examples become, get,
remain, stay, seem, appear, look, sound,
Relational processes: processes of be, feel; (3) the probe for such clauses is
being what?, how?, what…like?; (4) these
In discussing this kind of process clauses are not reversible: there are no
Halliday apply the category of relational passive forms.
clauses of the traditional notion of The identifying clauses have
‘copula’ construction. The English characteristics which contrast with the
system operates with three main types: attributive clauses: (1) the nominal group
(1) intensive; (2) circumstantial; (3) realizing the function identifier is typically
possessive. Each type occurs in two definite: it has a common noun as Head,
distinct modes, attributive and with the or other specific determiner, or a
identifying. The attributive mode is an proper noun or pronoun; (2) the verb
entity having some quality ascribed or realizing the Process is one from the
attributed to it, while the identifying mode ‘equative’ classes, for example play, act
is some thing having an identity as, mean, indicate, equal, make, include,
assigned to it. Each has different sets of represent, illustrate, stand for, mean, be
participant roles: (1) attributive clauses become; (3) the probe for such clauses
with Carrier + Attribute, which are of is which?, who?, which/who…as?; (4)
the same order of abstraction but differ these clauses are reversible. All verbs
in generality as member to class, and (2) except the neutral have passive forms.
identifying clauses with Token + Value,
which are of different orders of Other process types
14
The examples are given in table 1 .
In addition to the three main types, there semiotic processes that are not
are three subsidiary process types, necessarily verbal (indicating, showing).
accommodates an intermediate type The central participant is labeled the
with mixed characteristics. They are Sayer – the participant saying, stating,
behavioural sharing characteristics of informing, asking, etc. it can be human
material and mental, verbal sharing the or human-like speaker, but it can also be
characteristics of mental and relational, other symbolic source, for example:
existential sharing the characteristics of She told me a strange story.
relational and material. They asked me whether I could come to
the meeting.
Behavioural processes The paper says there’ll be another
These are processes of physiological election.
and psychological behaviour. They are In addition, a verbal clause may
partly like the material and partly like the also represent the addressee of a
mental. The participant who is ‘behaving’ speech interaction, Receiver, for
typically a conscious being, labeled example they told me to leave at once.
Behaver. It is like the Senser, but the The Receiver can be the Subject in a
Process is grammatically like one of clause with a passive, e.g. I in I wasn’t
‘doing’, which have typical told the news. Beside the Receiver, the
characteristics: (1) the unmarked content of saying or the name of the
representation of present in present; (2) saying may also construed as a
they cannot report; (3) behavioural participant labeled the Verbiage. The
processes including categories reflecting other participant function is Target which
the mental and verbal ones, for is the entity that is targeted by the
examples look, talk, think, etc, and process of saying.
behavioural processes including more They told me a story.
material-like subtypes which covered by They were speaking French.
two main types physiological processes, She always praised him to his friends.
for examples cry, laugh, breathe, etc
and social processes, like sing, dance, Existential Processes
chat, etc. These represent that something exists or
happens. They resemble relational
Verbal processes processes, but they are different in that
Verbal processes represent processes there is only one participant. In
of ‘saying’. This category includes not existential clauses, the there signals the
only the different modes of saying process type but does not function as a
(asking, stating, offering) but also Location circumstance; nor does it
18
Ibid
19
Ibid
REFERENCES
Fries, Peter H. 1997. Theme and New in
Badib, Abbas A. 2009. Linguistic Written English. In Tom Miller
Theories in EFL Teaching in a (Ed.), Functional Approaches to
Multilingual Setting. A paper Written Text: Classroom
presented in a seminar held by Application. Washington: English
English Dept. of UNIROW Tuban & Language Programs United States
The English Teachers’ Association Information Agency.
of Tuban, 8th February 2009.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Functional Grammar. New York:
Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.
New York: Addison Wesley
Longman Inc. Martin, J.R., Matthiesen, Christian
M.I.M., and Painter, Clare. 1997.
Eggins, Suzzane. 2004. An Introduction Working with Functional Grammar.
to Systemic Functional Grammar. London: Arnold
London: Continuum International
Publishing Group. Yalden, Janice.1987. The
Communicative Syllabus:
Foley, William A. & van Valin, Robert Evolution, Design, and
D.1984. Functional Syntax and Implementation. New Jersey:
Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Prentice Hall International.
Cambridge University Press.
Table 2
Type Actor Process Goal Beneficiary Range
Action she built the house for the kids
she moved the chair
Event the chair moved
she climbed the mountain
Table 3
The lion chased The tourist lazily through the
bush
participant process participant circumstance circumstance
Nominal Verbal Nominal Adverbial group Prepositional
group group group phrase
Table 4
let’s go home shall we
Subject Predicator Adjunct Finite Subject
Mood Residue Mood tag