An Overview of 5G Technologies

Huu Quy Tran, Ca Van Phan and Quoc-Tuan Vien

Abstract Since the development of 4G cellular networks is considered to have ended

in 2011, the attention of the research community is now focused on innovations in
wireless communications technology with the introduction of the fifth-generation
(5G) technology. One cycle for each generation of cellular development is generally
thought to be about 10 years; so the 5G networks are promising to be deployed around
2020. This chapter will provide an overview and major research directions for the
5G that have been or are being deployed, presenting new challenges as well as recent
research results related to the 5G technologies. Through this chapter, readers will have
a full picture of the technologies being deployed toward the 5G networks and vendors
of hardware devices with various prototypes of the 5G wireless communications
systems.

1 Introduction

Intelligent devices are developing daily from personal and household equipment,
such as smartphones, washing machines, fridges, air-conditioners, etc., to bulky items
in factories. These devices are keeping changing to accommodate the upcoming fifth-
generation (5G) of cellular networks. The 5G networks can therefore be regarded as
an infrastructure to accelerate the process of social change and the industry.
The 5G networks are promising to meet the demands of various individual appli-
cations with a significant increase in size, content, and rate. It is also a platform for
innovation to deal with millions of applications. The 5G networks, however, raise
a number of issues that need to be tackled. For instance, how to guarantee that the

H. Quy Tran · C. Van Phan

Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
e-mail: 1627002@student.hcmute.edu.vn; tranquyhuu@iuh.edu.vn
H. Quy Tran
Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Q.-T. Vien (B)
Middlesex University, London, UK
e-mail: Q.Vien@mdx.ac.uk
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018 59
K. V. Arya et al. (eds.), Emerging Wireless Communication and Network Technologies,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0396-8_4
60 H. Quy Tran et al.

devices are interacting with each other with a latency of less than one millisecond?
Although such concern is not a critical requirement in general telecommunication
systems with only voice or data services, it is vital in some specific areas with par-
ticular services, such as healthcare, military, and disaster communications systems.
The applications of 5G cellular networks will spread across smart city infrastruc-
ture with high capacity storage, intelligent transportation, and smart communication
systems. The 5G evolution is being fueled by a number of factors such as the explosion
of mobile data traffic, the increasing demand for high data rates, and the growth in
connected and searchable devices for low-cost, energy-saving, and environmentally
friendly wireless communications.
This chapter is devoted to outlining various research directions for the 5G networks
that have been or are being studied and examined with new design challenges as well
as their relevant works will be provided.

2 Evolution of Mobile Technologies from 1G to 5G

Starting with the first-generation (1G) mobile communications systems launched by

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT) for the first time in 1979, the 1G systems
were then employed worldwide in the 1980s. In the 1G systems, analog wireless
access with narrowband frequency division multiple access (FDMA) is employed
with a channel spacing of around 25–30 kilohertz (kHz). Then, the second-generation
(2G) systems, i.e., North American Interim Standards 54 and 136 (IS-54/136), Euro-
pean standards Global System for Mobile (GSM), and Japan standards Personal
Digital Cellular (PDC), were deployed in the 1990s, all of which adopted time divi-
sion multiple access (TDMA) with the channel spacing ranging from 25 to 200 kHz
[1].
Along with FDMA and TDMA, a wireless access technique based on code divi-
sion multiple access (CDMA) was developed and standardized first in the IS-95 by
Qualcomm in 1995 with its initial version called cdmaOne. With the CDMA, the
channel spacing is 1250 kHz, which is much wider compared to the traditional 2G
systems [1]. The data transfer rate in the 2G systems is however only around 9.6
kilobits per second (kbps) and does not meet the requirements of multimedia com-
munications with high resolution. This accordingly motivated the development of the
third-generation (3G) systems. The 3G systems were expected to provide advanced
services with much higher data rates of megabits per second (Mbps) [2–4]. The first
3G networks were introduced by NTT DoCoMo in Japan in 1998 and were commer-
cially launched in October 2001 also by NTT DoCoMo. The 3G systems were then
deployed worldwide; for instance, in South Korea in January 2002 by SK Telecom,
in the United States in 2002 by Monet Mobile Networks, and in the United Kingdom
in 2003 by Hutchison Telecom.
With higher data rate requirements, the cellular networks kept evolving from the
3G to the fourth-generation (4G) systems. As a candidate standard for the 4G systems,
the first-release Long-Term Evolution (LTE) standard was commercially deployed in
An Overview of 5G Technologies 61

Norway and Sweden in 2009. The 4G systems enable a very high data transmission
rate of up to 1–1.5 Gigabits per second (Gbps) for low-mobility communication,
such as pedestrians, stationary users, nomadic and local wireless access, and up to
100 Mbps for high-mobility communication, such as mobile access from trains and
cars. The 4G technologies were regarded as the future standard of wireless devices,
allowing users to download and transfer high-quality multimedia. There exist two
standard core technology of the 4G networks, including Worldwide Interoperability
for Microwave Access (WiMAX) and LTE using different frequency bands (see [5,
6] and references therein). The LTE has switched to LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) since
the fall of 2009 with many various LTE services started to launch in South Korea,
the United States, and the United Kingdom in 2012.
Beyond the current 4G systems with LTE-A standards, the fifth-generation (5G)
wireless systems have been proposed to be the next telecommunications standards
aiming at providing a higher capacity, a higher reliability, and a higher density
of mobile broadband users [7–9]. In order to address the high traffic growth and
increasing demand for high-bandwidth connectivity, the development of 5G networks
becomes crucial to support a massive number of connected devices with real-time
services and high-reliability communications in critical applications [10–13]. By pro-
viding wireless connectivity for a diversity of applications from wearable devices,
smartphones, tablets, and laptops to utilities within smart homes, transportation, and
industry, the 5G networks are promising to provide ubiquitous connectivity for any
kind of devices, enabling and accelerating the development of Internet of Things
(IoT).
Further than improving solely the maximum throughput, the 5G systems are
expected to provide lower power consumption dealing with battery issues, concurrent
data transfer paths, lower outage, and better coverage for cell-edge and high-mobility
users. Moreover, the 5G systems are required to be more secure, better cognitive func-
tionality via software-defined radio (SDR), and artificial intelligent (AI) capabilities.
With the employment of the SDR, a lower infrastructure cost could be favorably
achieved, which might help reduce the traffic fees while the users can experience
high-quality multimedia beyond 4G speeds. The evolution of mobile technologies
from 1G to 5G is illustrated in Fig. 1.

3 5G Trends, Targets, Requirements, and Challenges

Despite some uncertainties, the 5G wireless systems have drawn attention to pub-
licity, generating a call for innovative designs and philosophies from researchers
in academia to mobile operators and communications service providers in indus-
try. Expected to be commercially deployed around 2020, the 5G systems are being
learnt with various proposed technologies to create more effective and financially
viable business models [14]. Some widely known use cases of the 5G systems can be
listed as in Fig. 2, which consist of broadband experience everywhere anytime, smart
62 H. Quy Tran et al.

Fig. 1 Evolution of mobile technologies

Fig. 2 5G use cases

vehicles transport and infrastructure, media everywhere, critical control of remote

devices, and interaction between human and IoT.
Given the above use cases, it is totally optimistic that the 5G systems will offer
significant benefits to all users and operators in the future mobile networks as long
An Overview of 5G Technologies 63

as all the challenges could be overcome. In the following, specific trends, targets,
and requirements of the 5G networks will be briefly presented along with some of
emerging challenges and major technical issues to be confronted.

3.1 5G Trends

As one of the key new services in the 5G networks, the IoT will influence the num-
ber of connected devices that will enter the marketplace. Additionally, the IoT will
have a significant impact on 5G traffic patterns as well as their quality of service
(QoS) requirements, all of which will also affect backhaul requirements and speci-
fications. The aggregate data demand of the IoT should be very different from that
of smartphone-oriented experiences. Capacity demands will grow and more base
stations will have to be deployed to achieve the required QoS which are absolutely
necessary for the IoT to be successful.
There are five key trends of the underlying 5G networks as the IoT expands [14],
which can be listed as follows:
• More capacity per device: In order to meet the requirements of ultrahigh capacity
per end device, as the first trend of the 5G networks, either more spectrums for
improved spectrum efficiency or enhanced technologies are required.
• More devices of different types: The average number of devices per person is
anticipated to rapidly increase in both quantity and diversity with a variety of
device types for different services, such as smartphones, tablets, and wearable
devices like smart watches and glasses. The 5G systems are therefore required to
overhaul such exponential augmentation of devices.
• Higher capacity for denser networks: With the increased number of devices,
the 5G systems aim at increasing the site capacity by up to 1000 times of the
current networks. Although such task sounds feasible given numerous evolved
technologies, several challenges need to be addressed. For instance, the current
wireless backhaul links need to support a data rate of ten Gigabits per second
(Gbps) or higher and are also required to cover denser networks.
• Enhanced backhaul capability for critical applications: Many new service types
are developing in mission-critical networks for government, transportation, public
safety, healthcare systems and military services. For these critical applications, the
coverage, ultralow latency and strict security are dramatically the needs of wireless
backhaul infrastructure in the 5G systems to lessen the risks of communication
failure.
• Diverse virtual and cloud-based services: With cloud technology, it is promis-
ing that capital expenditure and operating expenses would be saved along with
the openings of potential markets for a variety of virtual and cloud-based ser-
vices. The 5G wireless systems will therefore give the operators and researchers
the opportunity of reviewing and adapting the current technologies to the cloud
platform.
64 H. Quy Tran et al.

3.2 5G Targets

The mobile data traffic is tremendously growing every year as per increasing users’
demands over a number of applications and services with different smart devices.
The present 4G networks, although have been shown to be satisfactory, may not be
able to cope with such rapid growth in future. So, will the 5G networks be able to
support a million connected devices per square kilometer with a download rate of up
to 10 Gbps and a latency of less than one millisecond? The 5G systems are full of
promise, incorporating a number of targets that require a lot of efforts. Some of the
5G targets are as follows:
• Enhanced user experiences: The 5G systems will not simply an enhanced 4G
systems as an evolution, but they will aim at bringing new network and service
capabilities given limited bandwidth and power resources. With novel design in the
5G networks, user experiences will be enriched guaranteeing that users can con-
tinuously access mobile broadband networks, especially in critical circumstances;
for instance, in high-mobility trains, airplanes, dense areas, etc.
• Platform for IoT: The 5G systems will be driven toward providing a platform for
IoT. A massive number of smart sensors will be connected to deliver various kinds
of service in our daily life given an inevitable fact that they have severely limited
power and short lifetime.
• Improved mission-critical services: The 5G systems will be destined for mission-
critical services, such as public safety, healthcare, disaster, and emergency services,
which require high-reliability communications with low latency and high coverage.
• Unified network infrastructure: The 5G systems will be tailored to meet the
requirements of various network infrastructures in order to bring them together in
a unified infrastructure. This integration will not only provide scope for optimizing
all networking, computing, and storage resources but also enable dynamic usage
of these resources along with convergence of services.
• Incorporated market for operators: The 5G systems will be directed to enable
operators to collaborate over a digital or virtual market by taking advantage of
cloud computing. Such market will make room for further development of the 5G
networks.
• Sustainable and scalable network: The 5G systems will be particularly focused
on energy consumption reduction and energy harvesting, targeting at compensating
the radical increase of energy usage. With automation integration and hardware
optimization, the operational cost will be expected to considerably reduce for
sustainable and scalable network model.
• Ecosystem for innovation: The 5G systems will be means for involving vertical
markets in different sectors and areas, such as energy, transportation, manufac-
turing, agriculture, health care, education, government, and so on. This will be
an excellent opportunity to encourage startups and innovations in these diverse
trading businesses.
An Overview of 5G Technologies 65

3.3 5G Requirements

Aiming at enabling new services as well as enhancing current services in the next
few years, there are a number of expected requirements for the 5G networks, which
are more diverse than those for the 4G networks. Specifically, the 5G networks need
to meet the following requirements:
• User experiences should be consistently and ubiquitously delivered in the 5G
systems at a high data rate and low latency with optional mobility support for
specific user demands of certain services.
• Networks/systems are required to support massive connected devices with high
traffic density, high spectrum efficiency, and high coverage.
• Devices/terminals are desired to be smarter allowing operator control capabilities
with programmability and configurability, supporting multiple frequency bands,
increasing battery life, and improving resource and signaling efficiency.
• Services are indispensable to provide connectivity transparency with seamless,
ubiquitous and high-reliability communications for mobile users, improve local-
ization with additional three-dimensional space attributes, protect users’ data from
possible cybersecurity attacks, as well as ensuring the availability and resilience
of mission-critical services.
• Network deployment, operational, and management are all needed to provide
the new enhanced services in a low cost and low energy consumption for ensuring
sustainability of the 5G and beyond networks, and also should facilitate the future
upgrade and innovation assuring flexibility and scalability.

3.4 5G Challenges

Although the 5G systems are optimistic encouraging researchers in both academia

and industry to overcome limitations of the current standards and theories, there are
several challenges that need to be tackled in order to meet the requirements as stated
in Sect. 3.3 and also to achieve the proposed targets in Sect. 3.2.
As one of the critical issues in the existing technologies, energy performance
needs to be improved with appropriate resource allocation. The resources should be
optimized to facilitate better utilization in a dynamic and adaptable manner. Addi-
tionally, given the scarcity of spectrum resource, an efficient spectrum usage is crucial
in the 5G systems to support massive connected devices of different kinds.
In particular, a higher coverage with a higher density of mobile broadband users
needs to be coped with in the 5G systems. Indeed, the 5G systems will need to manage
a very dense heterogeneous network. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the radio resource
management will become a paramount problem to handle the dense deployment
of small cells in coordination with existing macrocells and billions of connected
devices.
66 H. Quy Tran et al.

Fig. 3 Radio resource management in 5G

4 5G Enabling Technologies

Working toward 5G and beyond systems, a variety of enabling technologies have

been being researched and developed, of which some are at still at early stage along
with those well proposed in the literature as illustrated in Fig. 4. In this section, these
technologies will be sequentially presented outlining their key concepts with relevant
works.

Fig. 4 5G enabling technologies

An Overview of 5G Technologies 67

4.1 Massive MIMO

Massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) (also known as large-scale MIMO

or large-scale antenna systems) is an emerging technology in the next-generation
mobile system, i.e., 5G and beyond, which has been upgraded from the conventional
multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO) technology. A typical massive MIMO architecture
is illustrated in Fig. 5.
The massive MIMO has shown to be potential in dealing with the high sensitivity
to blockages and distance-dependent propagation effects. In an effort to achieve all
the gains of the MU-MIMO, the massive MIMO is promising to provide a larger scale
in terms of energy and spectrum efficiency [15]. In particular, the massive MIMO
exploits the spatial multiplexing gain to increase almost ten times of the capacity
and 100 times of the energy efficiency compared with the MU-MIMO systems. In
the massive MIMO, large arrays of antennas that contain a few hundred of antenna
elements are deployed at base station (BS) to simultaneously serve several terminals
using the same time–frequency resources.
In the MU-MIMO systems, to achieve both uplink and downlink spectral efficien-
cies, both the BS and the terminals must handle several complicated signal processing
operations and have the channel state information (CSI) on the downlink which is
accommodated by transmitting pilots in both directions [16]. With the increase in
the number of antennas, the CSI process in the MU-MIMO systems is nevertheless
unreasonable for the massive MIMO systems, especially in high-mobility condi-
tions. In order to deal with such issue, the massive MIMO makes use of time division
duplex (TDD) mode for pilot transmission based on an assumption that the uplink
and downlink channels are reciprocal, and thus linear signal processing techniques
can be employed to provide near-optimal performance with a low complexity [17].

Fig. 5 Massive MIMO concept

68 H. Quy Tran et al.

4.2 mmWave Massive MIMO

Current mobile systems are all allocated in the microwave frequency bands of which
most operate in the bands below 3 GHz and share the scarce spectrum resources of
600 MHz divided among operators. In contrast, mmWave frequency bands ranging
from 3 to 300 GHz can offer multi-GHz of unlicensed bandwidth [18].
Some mmWave propagation measurements performed recently in both indoor
and outdoor environments have similar general characteristics to the microwave
propagation that reveals the great potential for small-cell communications [19]. Large
arrays of antennas can eliminate the frequency dependence of path loss significantly
compared with omnidirectional antennas. In addition, the narrow beams provided by
adaptive arrays of antennas are able to reduce the impact of interference. In addition,
the extremely short wavelength of the mmWave signals allows small antenna to direct
them in narrow beams with enough gain to overcome propagation losses [20]. So, it
is very likely to build a large number of antenna elements in a small area enough to
fit into the mobile phones. This is the most important feature that helps to realize the
massive MIMO at mmWave bands in realistic environments [21, 22].
mmWave massive MIMO has potential to provide ultra-large bandwidth and high
spectrum efficiency that may significantly improve the overall system throughput in
the future 5G cellular networks. An example of its deployment is illustrated in Fig. 6.
However, due to the special propagation features and hardware requirements of the
mmWave systems, there are several challenges when deploying the mmWave massive
MIMO at the physical and upper layers. Particularly, the network architecture and
protocols must be considered carefully in the network design to adapt signaling and
resource allocation, as well as to cope with severe channel attenuation, directionality,
and blockage [23].

Fig. 6 mmWave massive

MIMO deployment
An Overview of 5G Technologies 69

4.3 Cloud Radio Access Networks

In general cell site architecture deployed in the 3G systems, BS contains two sep-
arated sectors including remote radio head (RRH) or remote radio unit (RRU) and
baseband unit (BBU) or DATA UNIT (DU). The RRH performs radio frequency
(RF) processing, digital-to-analog conversion (DAC), analog-to-digital conversion
(ADC), and power amplification and filtering, while the BBU provides baseband-
processing functions. In contrast to the traditional radio access networks (RANs),
cloud radio access network (C-RAN) has recently emerged as a novel architecture
for the RAN in which the baseband processing is now centralized and based on cloud
computing technology [24–29].
In C-RAN architecture, all baseband computational resources are processed and
aggregated within a central pool, also known as a virtualized BBU Pool. The geo-
graphically distributed RRHs/antennas are connected to a cloud platform through
an optical transmission network. This model allows reducing the number of BBUs
while maintaining similar coverage and offering better services compared to the tra-
ditional RAN architecture [30–33]. In fact, several cell sites can effectively share the
computation resources, and thus help save a lot of operation and management cost
leading to a significantly reduced capital expenditure. In addition, the virtualization
in cloud computing has also the potential to achieve load balancing and scalability.
This means that it is able to allocate and utilize the resources more efficiently under
busty traffic conditions thus reducing waste of computation resources and power con-
sumption [34]. Moreover, the resource cloudification in the C-RAN allows network
operators to provide the RAN as a cloud service [35].
A comparison of C-RAN architecture and the traditional BS architecture is illus-
trated in Fig. 7. In Fig. 7a, the antenna module is located a few meters from the BS
and connected to the BS by using coaxial cables with high signal attenuation in the
traditional BS. Another configuration is shown in Fig. 7b where the BS with RRH
is separated into two parts including RRU and BBU, which are connected by fiber
optic cable, while the coaxial cable is only used to connect the RRH and the antenna.
Finally, the fully centralized C-RAN architecture, as shown in Fig. 7c, is character-
ized by a large number of the RRHs located at different antenna sites connected to a
BBU pool cloud located in a centralized cloud server through an optical transmission
network.

4.4 D2D Communications

Device-to-device (D2D) communications is one of the most important technologies

in 5G systems. In D2D communications, mobile user equipment (UE) communicates
with each other in short range without involving eNodeB or the core network on the
licensed cellular network.
70 H. Quy Tran et al.

Fig. 7 Base station architecture evolution

Fig. 8 Typical use cases of D2D communications in cellular networks

The D2D communications not only provides a flexible communication platform

based on multiple radio access technologies embedded on mobile UEs but also
promises to considerably improve energy efficiency, throughput, spectrum efficiency,
and so on [36, 37]. In addition, it is feasible for integrating cooperative communi-
cation and cognitive radio along with performance optimization combining both ad
hoc and centralized communications in the D2D communication. Figure 8 illustrates
typical use cases of the D2D communications which can be found in smart building,
healthcare, and public safety networks, e.g., [38, 39].
An Overview of 5G Technologies 71

The D2D communication, however, faces several challenges including interfer-

ence management, resource allocation, as well as delay-sensitive processing. In fact,
in the 3GPP LTE architecture, there are many pairs of D2D UEs sharing cellular
resources of eNodeB that may cause severe interferences including the interference
from the eNodeB within the same cell, those from other co-channel D2D UEs in the
same cell, and also those from the eNodeBs and co-channel D2D UEs within other
cells [40, 41]. The resource allocation is also one of the most important concerns in
the D2D communications given a limited number of subcarriers in the 3GPP LTE
networks. Based on the quality of service requirement, the resource allocation tech-
nique will be selected consist of D2D mode or power control in cellular networks
[42].

4.5 Ultradense Heterogeneous Networks

4.5.1 Heterogeneous Networks

In order to cope with the rapid growth of wireless traffic demands in 5G commu-
nications, the deployment of a large number of small cells (femtocell, picocell, and
microcell) has been shown to be a feasible solution to achieve high capacity, leading
to a heterogeneous network (HetNet). The HetNet is typically a multi-tier network
architecture consisting of multiple types of infrastructure elements including macro-
BSs, micro-BSs, pico-BSs, and femto-BSs with different transmission powers and
coverage sizes.
In the HetNet, the powerful macro-BSs with high-power transmission are
deployed in a planned way for covering large geographical areas whereas the small-
cell BSs serving small coverage areas is used to complement the traditional macro-
BSs. The range of a microcell or picocell is in the order of few hundred meters,
whereas femtocells are used to provide indoor coverage within the range of few
meters. A typical heterogeneous network is shown in Fig. 9 where the low-power
BSs served for microcells or picocells which are deployed to cover a small area with
heavy traffic such as a commercial center, airport, subway, and train station.
By deploying a variety of cells of different sizes, the HetNet architecture is highly
probable for increasing the radio capacity, improving throughput, and serving sev-
eral types of users with different QoS requirements in the next-generation cellular
networks [43]. In addition, the deployment of low-power small-cell BSs in dense
areas is one of the key solutions to enhance coverage and provide more capacity
by covering smaller area than macro-BSs as well as improve the spectral efficiency
of cellular networks. Moreover, the small cell integrated with macrocells provides
a potential opportunity to decouple the control plane and user plane in which low-
power small-cell BSs handle the control plane, while the overall control signaling
to all users and cell-specific reference signals of small-cell BSs can be delivered
to powerful high-power macro-BSs. Therefore, HetNets have advantages of serving
hotspot customers with high data rates and busty traffic [44–48].
72 H. Quy Tran et al.

Fig. 9 Heterogeneous
cellular network

Along with a number of advantages, the HetNet is facing a critical issue when too
dense low-power small-cell BSs underlaid with macro-BSs reusing the same spec-
tral resources could incur severe inter-tier interferences [45, 46]. Hence, advanced
signal processing techniques are vital to fully obtain the potential gains of Het-
Nets. Specifically, the advanced coordinated multipoint (CoMP) transmission and
reception techniques have been proposed to suppress both intra-tier and inter-tier
interference and improve the cell-edge user throughput [49, 50]. Another technique
for enhancing the performance of the HetNet is co-locating massive MIMO BS and
low-power small cell access in which the massive MIMO ensures outdoor mobile
coverage whereas the small cell access equipped with cognitive and cooperative
functionalities enables the HetNet to provide high capacity for indoors and outdoors
with low-mobility users [26].

4.5.2 Distributed Antenna Systems

Another approach in dealing with dense networks is an employment of distributed

antenna systems (DAS). The DAS has shown to be the high potential providing
more uniform coverage, especially in shadowed and indoor areas, as well as enhanc-
ing the transmit capability of BS by adding multiple remote antenna units (RAUs)
geographically distributed in a macrocell [51].
In the DAS, the spatially separated antenna units are connected to a BS or a central
unit (CU) by using a high-bandwidth low-latency dedicated link that can be coaxial
cable or optical fiber [52]. In this way, the BS can operate as a multiple-antenna
system, although the antennas are located in different geographic locations. The DAS
can accordingly improve indoor and outdoor coverage, reduce the outage probability,
and increase the capacity of cellular systems in a variety of configurations. A typical
DAS is illustrated in Fig. 10 where spatially separated antenna elements are connected
to a macro-BS via a dedicated fiber/microwave backhaul link. This configuration
indeed provides a better coverage since the terminals can connect to nearby antenna
An Overview of 5G Technologies 73

Fig. 10 Distributed
antennas systems

elements, and thus a higher capacity gain can be achieved by exploiting both macro-
and micro-diversities.
Comparing with co-located-antenna systems, the DAS has been shown to achieve
a much higher sum capacity due to higher water-filling gain and multiuser diversity
gain. Moreover, DAS technique allows shortening considerably the radio transmis-
sion distance between the transmitter and receiver leading to support high data rate
transmission and achieve significant improvement in power efficiency [53, 54]. Par-
ticularly, fully distributed antennas also result in higher sum rates than having multi-
ple antennas at each RRU with the same number of antennas. Since all the RAUs in a
macrocell are connected to a CU remotely, spatial diversity and spatial multiplexing
can be exploited in the DAS in order to improve the system performance.

4.5.3 Ultradense Heterogeneous Networks

Demand for high-speed data traffic in the mobile and ubiquitous computing era has
been growing explosively and exponentially in recent years. For instance, in apart-
ments, enterprises, and hotspot environments where users with high traffic demand
are densely distributed. Deploying ultradense heterogeneous small cells has been
widely recognized as a promising technique to address such exponential traffic
growth with enhanced coverage especially in indoor and hotspot environments [55,
56]. The networks with a large number of densely distributed heterogeneous small
cells, also known as ultradense HetNets, are illustrated in Fig. 11.
In ultradense HetNet architecture, the low-power small-cell BSs are densely
deployed within the coverage area, which is served by the high-power macrocell
BS to enhance the spectrum efficiency and thus increase the network capacity. The
ultradense HetNet has also been regarded as a network in which inter-site com-
munications occur at very short distances with low interferences. In particular, the
distances between the access nodes in the newly envisioned small cells range from
a few meters for femtocells deployed in indoor up to 50 m for microcells or pico-
74 H. Quy Tran et al.

Fig. 11 Ultradense HetNets

cells with outdoor deployment [57]. Over the short distances between the users and
the small-cell BSs, the received power of the desired signal at the user increases
considerably, promising to provide a significantly enhanced network capacity.
Although the deployment of ultradense HetNets has been well identified as a
feasible solution to manage the increasing traffic demands, the dense and random
deployment of the small cells and their uncoordinated operation also bring several
challenges in such multi-tier networks [58–61]. In this distributed network archi-
tecture, both backhaul and fronthaul traffics need to be relayed to the destination.
Hence, an efficient multi-hop routing algorithm becomes crucial for such scenario.
Since the coverage of the small cells in ultradense HetNet is less than that of the
macrocell in the conventional cellular networks, the frequent handover in small cells
causes a considerably increased redundant overhead and also reduces the user expe-
riences. In addition, the mmWave antennas with beamforming technique equipped in
the small-cell BS can provide strong directivity having the advantage of high-speed
transmission but revealing the disadvantage in supporting the high-speed mobile
users.

4.5.4 Security Issues

The security of mobile devices access in ultradense heterogeneous network is largely

based on the specific features and architecture of the network system. We may find
that the vulnerabilities of ultradense heterogeneous networks can occur in some
cases, such as IP spoofing, interference management attack, handover management
attack, unauthorized cell identification, RFID Tag, etc.
From there we can define security domains to access the network without fail,
network accounts are not attacked, networks are stable, and quality of service meets
the increasing needs of users. A typical security architecture of the user ultradense
heterogeneous networks (UUDHN) is illustrated in Fig. 12 [62]. In this security
An Overview of 5G Technologies 75

Fig. 12 User ultradense

heterogeneous network
security architecture

architecture, the UUDHN is a wireless heterogeneous network in which the access

point (AP) density is comparable to the user density. The UUDHN organizes an
access point group (APG) as the following coverage to serve each user seamlessly
without user’s involvement, and there are many security feature groups.
• The AP access security: The APs are very familiar to the user and even may be
deployed by the user. The security threats of AP deployment which the UUDHN
facing is the same as home evolved node B (HeNB) in long-term evolution (LTE)
network. The HeNB supports a device validation method with either certification
based or universal subscriber identity module (USIM) based mutual authentication,
which helps prevent the attacker from exploiting the HeNB as a springboard to
access the LTE networks [63]. In order to access the UUDHN, the APs also need
to simultaneously authenticate between them and the UUDHN networks. When
the authentication is successful, the APs then can enter into the working status.
• The APG organization security: The overall security of the UUDHN will be threat-
ened by a malicious AP which counterfeits the APG. To cope with the APG secu-
rity threats, two security aspects should be considered, including: (i) A security
refresher for new APs joining the APG or AP registration leaving the APG, and
(ii) A secure communication (e.g., collaborative signaling and data exchange, etc.)
between the APG members.
• User equipment (UE) to the UUDHN access network security: Because the APG
is refreshing, there are so many threats have emerged. The members of the APGs
will be changed and the AP wireless connections may be entered by attackers.
For instance, when the data transferred between the UE and the APs (APG), the
attackers can eavesdrop on or manipulate the signaling and user data. The user’s
mobility between the APs may be also found or discovered where a particular user
is located. These can pose a huge threat to user’s privacy. It is the effective mea-
sures to protect the user’s private data with the keys based on specific encryption
algorithms. For instance, it is relied on the APG interim key to derive the keys for
ciphering of user plane (KUPint) and also protects the integrity and encryption of
76 H. Quy Tran et al.

the radio resource control (RRC) signals between the UE and AP/APG (KRRCenc
and KRRCint) is an effective way.
• The UE to the UUDHN core network security: In the UUDHN, the AP may pertain
to multiple APGs (in another APG-ID) at certain time at a local service center
(LSC). Obviously, there are threats that the APG or the AP may be counterfeited.
Then, the UE may be attacked to access the other the APG or the UUDHN core
networks by the counterfeited the AP. So as to prevent these threats, the mutual
authentication mechanism between the UE and the LSC (APG-ID defined therein)
needs to be considered to make sure the UE access security.
• Network access security: The set of security features providing users and entities
with secure access to services and which particularly protect against attacks on
the (radio) access link.
• Network domain security: The set of security features about the APG organization
security, including the APG initiating, APG-ID/master the AP selection, the APG
refreshing, the APG handover, and the AP security itself. They protect against
attacks from the counterfeited the APs/APG.
• The APG domain security: The set of security features enabling entities to securely
exchange signaling data and user data (among access network, serving network,
and within access network) and protect against attacks on the wireline network.
• User domain security: The set of security features securing access to mobile sta-
tions.
• Application domain security: The set of security features enabling applications in
the user and in the provider domain to securely exchange messages [64].

5 Conclusions

After nearly four decades since the birth of the first-generation networks, mobile
communications networks have been continuously evolved as an important infras-
tructure offering distinct types of services in our daily life and activities. This chapter
has sketched a picture for the evolution of the mobile technologies from 1G to 5G that
has attracted interests of a number of researchers and developers. The upcoming 5G
systems have indeed drawn their attention with a variety of trends, targets, require-
ments, and challenges to be tackled. Dealing with these challenges, this chapter
has outlined different enabling technologies, including massive MIMO, mmWave
massive MIMO, C-RAN, D2D, HetNet, DAS, and ultradense HetNet. These tech-
nologies have been shown to be promising candidates for the 5G wireless networks,
meeting the strict requirements of high spectrum efficiency and energy efficiency as
well as enhancing user experiences and services. With a number of evolved tech-
niques, we are completely hopeful and optimistic that the upcoming 5G systems are
going to fulfill the mobile users’ demands in ultrahigh data rates, very low latency,
high mobility, high coverage, long-life batteries, high reliability, and extraordinarily
enhanced services.
An Overview of 5G Technologies 77

References

1. K. S. Gilhousen, I. M. Jacobs, R. Padovani, A. J. Viterbi, L. A. Weaver and C. E. Wheatley,

“On the capacity of a cellular CDMA system,” in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,
vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 303–312, May 1991.
2. W. C. Y. Lee, “Overview of cellular CDMA,” in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,
vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 291–302, May 1991.
3. F. Adachi, “Wireless past and future evolving mobile communications systems”, in IEICE
Transactions on Fundamentals, vol. E84-A, pp. 55–60, January 2001.
4. H. Viswanathan and M. Weldon, “The past, present, and future of mobile communications,” in
Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 19, pp. 8–21, 2014.
5. A. Damnjanovic et al., “A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks,” in IEEE Wireless Com-
munications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 10–21, June 2011.
6. S. Parkvall et al., “LTE-Advanced - Evolving LTE towards IMT-Advanced,” in Proc. IEEE
VTC 2008, Calgary, BC, 2008, pp. 1–5.
7. A. Osseiran et al., “Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the
METIS project,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 26–35, May 2014.
8. J. G. Andrews et al., “What will 5G be?,” in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,
vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1065–1082, June 2014.
9. A. Gupta and R. K. Jha, “A survey of 5G network: Architecture and emerging technologies,”
in IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 1206–1232, 2015.
10. R. Trestian, P. Shah, H. X. Nguyen, Q.-T. Vien, O. Gemikonakli, and B. Barn, “Towards
connecting people, locations and real-world events in a cellular network,” in Telematics and
Informatics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 244–271, February 2017.
11. R. Trestian and H. Venkataraman, 5G Radio Access Networks: centralized RAN, cloud-RAN
and virtualization of small cells, eds. CRC Press, 2017.
12. F. Boccardi, R. W. Heath, A. Lozano, T. L. Marzetta and P. Popovski, “Five disruptive technol-
ogy directions for 5G,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 74–80, February
2014.
13. C. X. Wang et al., “Cellular architecture and key technologies for 5G wireless communication
networks,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 122–130, February 2014.
14. D. Cohen, “5G and the IoT: 5 trends and implications,” in Microwave Journal, September
2016.
15. E. G. Larsson, O. Edfors, F. Tufvesson and T. L. Marzetta, “Massive MIMO for next generation
wireless systems,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 186–195, February
2014.
16. H. Q. Ngo, E. G. Larsson and T. L. Marzetta, “Energy and spectral efficiency of very large
multiuser MIMO systems,” in IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 4, pp.
1436–1449, April 2013.
17. L. Lu, G. Y. Li, A. L. Swindlehurst, A. Ashikhmin and R. Zhang, “An overview of massive
MIMO: Benefits and challenges,” in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing,
vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 742–758, October 2014.
18. F. Boccardi, R. W. Heath, A. Lozano, T. L. Marzetta and P. Popovski, “Five disruptive technol-
ogy directions for 5G,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 74–80, February
2014.
19. M. Shafi et al., “5G: A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and
practice,” in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1201–1221,
June 2017.
20. A. L. Swindlehurst, E. Ayanoglu, P. Heydari and F. Capolino, “Millimeter-wave massive
MIMO: the next wireless revolution?,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 9,
pp. 56–62, September 2014.
21. T. E. Bogale and L. B. Le, “Massive MIMO and mmWave for 5G wireless HetNet: Potential
benefits and challenges,” in IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 64–75,
March 2016.
78 H. Quy Tran et al.

22. S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport and E. Erkip, “Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: Poten-
tials and challenges,” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 366–385, March 2014.
23. H. Shokri-Ghadikolaei, C. Fischione, G. Fodor, P. Popovski and M. Zorzi, “Millimeter wave
cellular networks: A MAC layer perspective,” in IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol.
63, no. 10, pp. 3437–3458, October 2015.
24. J. Wu, Z. Zhang, Y. Hong and Y. Wen, “Cloud radio access network (C-RAN): a primer,” in
IEEE Network, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–41, January-February 2015.
25. Q.-T. Vien, N. Ogbonna, H. X. Nguyen, R. Trestian, and P. Shah, “Non-orthogonal multiple
access for wireless downlink in cloud radio access networks,” in Proc. EW 2015, Budapest,
Hungary, May. 2015, pp. 434–439.
26. M. Agiwal, A. Roy and N. Saxena, “Next generation 5G wireless networks: A comprehensive
survey,” in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1617–1655, third
quarter 2016.
27. M. Peng, Y. Li, Z. Zhao and C. Wang, “System architecture and key technologies for 5G
heterogeneous cloud radio access networks,” in IEEE Networks, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 6–14,
March-April 2015.
28. Q.-T. Vien, T. A. Le, B. Barn, and C. V. Phan, “Optimising energy efficiency of non-orthogonal
multiple access for wireless backhaul in heterogeneous cloud radio access network,” in IET
Communications, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 2516–2524, 2016.
29. H. Q. Tran, P. Q. Truong, C. V. Phan, and Q.-T. Vien, “On the energy efficiency of NOMA for
wireless backhaul in multi-tier heterogeneous CRAN,” in Proc. SigTelCom 2017, Da Nang,
Vietnam, January 2017, pp. 229–234.
30. C. L. I, J. Huang, R. Duan, C. Cui, J. (. Jiang and L. Li, “Recent progress on C-RAN central-
ization and cloudification,” in IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 1030–1039, 2014.
31. M. Peng, Y. Li, J. Jiang, J. Li and C. Wang, “Heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: a new
perspective for enhancing spectral and energy efficiencies,” in IEEE Wireless Communications,
vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 126–135, December 2014.
32. A. Checko et al., “Cloud RAN for mobile networks - A technology overview,” in IEEE Com-
munications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 405–426, first quarter 2015.
33. Q.-T. Vien, N. Ogbonna, H. X. Nguyen, R. Trestian, and P. Shah, Performance evaluation
of NOMA under wireless downlink cloud radio access networks environments. In: 5G Radio
Access Networks: Centralized RAN, Cloud-RAN and Virtualization of Small Cells, CRC Press,
pp. 67–84, 2017.
34. P. Demestichas et al., “5G on the horizon: Key challenges for the radio-access network,” in
IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 47–53, September 2013.
35. P. Rost et al., “Cloud technologies for flexible 5G radio access networks,” in IEEE Communi-
cations Magazine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 68–76, May 2014.
36. N. Panwar, S. Sharma, A. K. Singh, “A survey on 5G: The next generation of mobile commu-
nication,” in Physical Communication, vol. 18, Part 2, pp. 64–84, March 2016.
37. R. Trestian, Q.-T. Vien, H. X. Nguyen, and O. Gemikonakli, “ECO-M: Energy-efficient cluster-
oriented multimedia streaming in a LTE D2D environment,” in Proc. IEEE ICC 2015, London,
UK, June 2015, pp. 55–61.
38. K. Ali, H. X. Nguyen, P. Shah, Q.-T. Vien, and N. Bhuvanasundaram, “Architecture for public
safety network using D2D communication,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC 2016 - Workshop on Com-
munications in Extreme Conditions (ComExCon 2016), Doha, Qatar, April 2016, pp. 206–211.
39. K. Ali, H. X. Nguyen, P. Shah, Q.-T. Vien, and E. Ever, “D2D multi-hop relaying services
towards disaster communication system,” in Proc. ICT 2017 - Workshop on 5G Networks for
Public Safety and Disaster Management (IWNDP 2017), Limassol, Cyprus, May 2017, pp.
1–5.
40. L. Wei, R. Q. Hu, Y. Qian and G. Wu, “Enable device-to-device communications underlaying
cellular networks: challenges and research aspects,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.
52, no. 6, pp. 90–96, June 2014.
41. J. Liu, N. Kato, J. Ma and N. Kadowaki, “Device-to-device communication in LTE-Advanced
networks: A survey,” in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp.
1923–1940, fourth quarter 2015.
An Overview of 5G Technologies 79

42. D. Feng, L. Lu, Y. Yuan-Wu, G. Y. Li, S. Li and G. Feng, “Device-to-device communications in

cellular networks,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 49–55, April 2014.
43. A. Ghosh et al., “Heterogeneous cellular networks: From theory to practice,” in IEEE Com-
munications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 54–64, June 2012.
44. R. Q. Hu and Y. Qian, “An energy efficient and spectrum efficient wireless heterogeneous
network framework for 5G systems,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp.
94–101, May 2014.
45. Q.-T. Vien, T. Akinbote, H. X. Nguyen, R. Trestian, and O. Gemikonakli, “On the coverage
and power allocation for downlink in heterogeneous wireless cellular networks,” in Proc. IEEE
ICC 2015, London, UK, June 2015, pp. 4641–4646.
46. Q.-T. Vien, T. A. Le, H. X. Nguyen, and M. Karamanoglu, “An energy-efficient resource
allocation for optimal downlink coverage in heterogeneous wireless cellular networks,” in
Proc. ISWCS 2015, Brussels, Belgium, August 2015, pp. 156–160.
47. R. Trestian, Q.-T. Vien, P. Shah, and G. Mapp, “Exploring energy consumption issues for
multimedia streaming in LTE HetNet small cells,” in Proc. IEEE LCN 2015, Florida, USA,
October 2015, pp. 498–501.
48. Q.-T. Vien, T. A. Le, C. V. Phan, and M. O. Agyeman, “An energy-efficient NOMA for small
cells in heterogeneous CRAN under QoS constraints,” in Proc. EW 2017, Dresden, Germany,
May 2017, pp. 80–85.
49. J. G. Andrews, “Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift,” in IEEE Communica-
tions Magazine, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 136–144, March 2013.
50. N. Bhuvanasundaram, H. X. Nguyen, R. Trestian, and Q.-T. Vien, “Sum-rate analysis of cell
edge users under cooperative NOMA,” in Proc. IFIP WMNC 2015, Munich, Germany, October
2015, pp. 239–244.
51. R. W. Heath Jr, T. Wu, Y. H. Kwon and A. C. K. Soong, “Multiuser MIMO in distributed
antenna systems with out-of-cell interference,” in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,
vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 4885–4899, October 2011.
52. Shidong Zhou, Ming Zhao, Xibin Xu, Jing Wang and Yan Yao, “Distributed wireless communi-
cation system: A new architecture for future public wireless access,” in IEEE Communications
Magazine, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 108–113, March 2003.
53. L. Dai, “A comparative study on uplink sum capacity with co-located and distributed antennas,”
in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1200–1213, June
2011.
54. H. Zhu, “Performance comparison between distributed antenna and microcellular systems,” in
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1151–1163, June 2011.
55. X. Ge, S. Tu, G. Mao, C. X. Wang and T. Han, “5G ultra-dense cellular networks,” in IEEE
Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 72–79, February 2016.
56. S. Chen, T. Zhao, H. H. Chen, Z. Lu and W. Meng, “Performance analysis of downlink coordi-
nated multipoint joint transmission in ultra-dense networks,” in IEEE Network, vol. PP, no.99,
pp. 12–20.
57. R. Baldemair et al., “Ultra-dense networks in millimeter-wave frequencies,” in IEEE Commu-
nications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 202–208, January 2015.
58. Y. S. Soh, T. Q. S. Quek, M. Kountouris and H. Shin, “Energy efficient heterogeneous cellular
networks,” in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 840–850,
May 2013.
59. T. Zhang, J. Zhao, L. An and D. Liu, “Energy efficiency of base station deployment in ultra
dense HetNets: A Stochastic Geometry Analysis,” in IEEE Wireless Communications Letters,
vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 184–187, April 2016.
60. S. F. Yunas, M. Valkama and J. Niemelä, “Spectral and energy efficiency of ultra-dense networks
under different deployment strategies,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp.
90–100, January 2015.
61. D. Calabuig et al., “Resource and mobility management in the network layer of 5G cellular
ultra-dense networks,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 162–169, 2017.
80 H. Quy Tran et al.

62. Z. Chen, S. Chen, H. Xu, B. Hu, “Security architecture and scheme of user-centric ultra-dense
network (UUDN),” in Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 28,
no. 9, pp. 2161–3915, February 2017.
63. 3GPP, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Small cell enhancements for
E-UTRA and E-UTRAN – Physical layer aspects (Rel. 12),” in 3GPP TR 36.872, V12.1.0,
September 2013.
64. S. Chen, F. Qin, B. Hu, X. Li, Z. Chen, “User-centric ultra-dense networks (UUDN) for 5G:
Challenges, methodologies and directions,” in IEEE Wireless Communication Magazine, vol.
23, no. 2, pp. 78–85, April 2016.