Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

MSY Lecture1 - Introduction To EC

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 46

15/3/2020

PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN SARAWAK (PPKS)


SARAWAK SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SSDC)

AN INTRODUCTION TO

EUROCODES

By:
Ir. Mohamad Salleh Yassin
School of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Structural Eurocodes are a set of


harmonized European standards
for the design of buildings and civil
engineering structures.

Developed over
twenty-five years
(Started since 1975)

1
15/3/2020

March 2010 they have effectively


replaced the British Standard as
the primary basis for designing
buildings and civil engineering
structures in the UK

Eurocodes have been developed


to improve the competitiveness of
the European construction industry
both within and outside the
European Union

A design framework plus detailed


implementation rules valid across
Europe and likely to find significant
usage worldwide

Claimed to be the most


technically advanced
structural design codes
available internationally

2
15/3/2020

The most advanced technical


views prepared by the best
informed groups of experts in their
fields across Europe

The most comprehensive


treatment of the subjects, with
many aspects not previously
codified now being covered by
agreed procedures

Provide common design criteria


and common understanding
regarding the design of structures
between owners, operators and
users, designers.
Eurocode is actually a
performance code which has
more advantages over British
Standard, which is a descriptive
code.

3
15/3/2020

The utilisation of the Eurocode will


be beneficial in the long term. It is
a state-of-the art code and
contains many improvements
which one cannot fine in the British
Standard.
Eurocodes lead to a modest
but significant improvement
in economy compared to
existing British Standards

4
15/3/2020

5
15/3/2020

6
15/3/2020

THREE PILLARS OF EUROPEAN


STANDARDISATION

Product Standards

EN 206 Concrete

EN 13369 Precast Concrete Products

EN 10025 Hotrolled Structural Steel Products

EN 10080 Steel for Reinforcement

EN 1317 Road Restraint System

7
15/3/2020

Execution Standards

EN 1090 Execution of Steel and Aluminium Structures

EN 13670 Execution of Concrete Structures

EN 1536 Execution of Special Geotechnical Works: Bored Piles

EN 1537 Execution of Special Geotechnical Works: Ground Anchors

The Structural Eurocodes


The Eurocode Family (58 all together)
EN 1990 Eurocode Basis of structural design
EN 1991 Eurocode 1 Actions on structures
EN 1992 Eurocode 2 Design of concrete structures
EN 1993 Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures
EN 1994 Eurocode 4 Design of composite steel and concrete structures
EN 1995 Eurocode 5 Design of timber structures
EN 1996 Eurocode 6 Design of masonry structures
EN 1997 Eurocode 7 Geotechnical design
EN 1998 Eurocode 8 Design of structures for earthquake resistance
EN 1999 Logi Rawatan
EurocodeAir 9 Design of aluminium alloy structures Jambatan

8
15/3/2020

Organization and link between Eurocodes

Structural safety, serviceability


and durability

Actions on structures

Design and detailing

Geotechnical and seismic


design
Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

EUROCODE 1 : ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES


EN 1991-1-1 Densities, self weight and imposed loads
EN 1991-1-2 Actions on structures exposed to fire
EN 1991-1-3 Snow loads
EN 1991-1-4 Wind loads
EN 1991-1-5 Thermal loads
EN 1991-1-6 Actions during execution
EN 1991-1-7 Accidental actions
EN 1991-2 Traffic loads on bridges
EN 1991-3 Actions induced by cranes and machinery
EN 1991-4 Silos and tanks Jambatan

9
15/3/2020

EUROCODE 2 : DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES

EN 1992-1-1 General rules and rules for buildings

EN 1992-1-2 General rules – Structural fire design

Concrete bridges – design and detailing


EN 1992-2
rules
Liquid retaining and containment
EN 1992-3
structures

EUROCODE vs BS
Eurocodes Title Superseded standards
EN 1990 Basis of structural design BS 8110: Part 1- Section 2
EN 1991-1-1 Densities, self-weight and imposed BS 6399: Part1 and BS 648
loads
EN 1991-1-2 Action on structures exposed to -
fire
EN 1991-1-3 Snow loads BS 6399: Part 2
EN 1991-1-4 Wind loads BS 6399: Part 3
EN 1991-1-5 Thermal actions -
EN 1991-1-6 Actions during execution -
EN 1991-1-7 Accidental actions -
Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

10
15/3/2020

Eurocodes Title Superseded standards


EN 1991-2 Traffic loads on bridges BD 37/88
EN 1991-3 Actions induced by -
crane and machinery
EN 1991-4 Silos and tanks -
EN 1992-1-1 General rules for BS 8110: Parts 1, 2 and 3
buildings
EN 1992-1-2 Fire resistance of BS 8110: Part 1 Table 3.2
concrete structures BS 8110: Part 2 Sect. 4
EN 1992-2 Bridges BS 5400: Part 4
EN 1992-3 Liquid-retaining and BS 8007
containment structures
Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Format of the Eurocodes


 Each Eurocode contains:
- National Fowarded
- Main text and Annexes
- National Annex

 National annex gives Nationally


Determined Parameters (NDPs)

 NDPs have been allowed for reason of


safety, economy and durability

11
15/3/2020

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Two types of annex

Normative annexes are part of


the requirements of the code.

Informative annexes provide


guidance that can be adopted
or not on a country by country
basis.

12
15/3/2020

 The family of Eurocode is


based on principles rather than
methods

 Format of all codes is: principles,


materials, ultimate, service,
detailing

 All materials are subjected to


the same limit state regime Jambatan

 Eurocodes used different terminology:


Eurocode British Standard
Action Force or imposed displacement
Verification Check
Resistance Capacity
Execution Construction
Permanent action Dead load
Variable action Live load or imposed load
Isostatic Primary

13
15/3/2020

 Eurocodes used subscripts extensively:

“Ed” = design internal effect


e.g. NEd = design axial force

“Rd” = design resistance


e.g. NRd = design resistance to
axial force

Logi Rawatan Air

THANK YOU

14
15/3/2020

PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN SARAWAK (PPKS)


SARAWAK SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SSDC)

EN 1990 :EUROCODE
Basis of structural
design
by :
Ir. Mohamad Salleh Yassin
School of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

EN 1990
Contents
Section 1 General
Section 2 Requirements
Section 3 Principles of Limit State Design
Section 4 Basic variables
Structural analysis and design assisted by
Section 5
testing

Section 6 Verification by the partial factor method

Annex A1 Application for buildings


Annex A2 Application for bridges
Management of structural reliability for
Annex B
construction works
Basis for partial factor design and
Annex C
reliability analysis
Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan
Annex D Design assisted by testing

15
15/3/2020

1.1 Scope

(1)EN 1990 establishes Principles and


requirements for safety,
serviceability and durability of
structures, describes the basis for
their design and verification and
gives guidelines for related
aspects of structural reliability.

(2) EN 1990 is intended to be used in


conjunction with EN 1991 to 1999
for the structural design of
buildings and civil engineering
works, including geotechnical
aspects, structural fire design,
situations involving earthquakes,
execution and temporary
structures

16
15/3/2020

(3) EN 1990 is applicable for the design of


structures where other materials or other
actions outside the scope of EN 1991 to 1999
are involved.

(4) EN 1990 is applicable for the structural


appraisal of existing construction, in
developing the design of repairs and
alterations or in assessing changes of use.

1.3 The general assumption of EN 1990 are:

- the choice of the structural system and the design of


the structure is made by appropriately qualified and
experienced personnel;

- execution is carried out by personnel having


appropriate skill and experience;

- adequate supervision and quality control is provided


during execution of the work, i.e. in design office,
factories, plant, and on sites;

17
15/3/2020

1.4 Distinction between Principles and


Application Rules
(1) Depending on the character of the individual clauses,
distinction is made in EN 1990 between Principles and
Application Rules.

(2) The Principles comprise:


- general statements and definitions for which there is no
alternatives, as well as;
- requirements and analytical models for which no
alternative is permitted unless specifically stated.

(3) The Principles are identified by letter P following the


paragraph number

(4) The Application Rules are generally recognised rules


which comply with the Principle and satisfy their
requirements.

(5) It is permissible to use alternative design rules different


from Application Rules given in EN 1990 for works,
provided that it is shown that the alternative rules accord
with the relevant Principles and are at least equivalent
with regard to the structural safety, serviceability and
durability which would be expected when using the
Eurocodes.

(6) In EN 1990, the Application Rules are identified by a


number in bracket.

18
15/3/2020

Section 2: Requirements

2.1 Basic Requirements

(1)P A structure shall be designed and executed in such a way


that it will, during its intended life, with appropriate degrees of
reliability and in an economical way
- sustain all actions and influences likely to occur during
execution and use, and
- remain fit for use for which it is required.

(2)P A structure shall be designed to have adequate:


- structural resistance
- serviceability, and
- durability

2.3 Design working life


Design working Indicative design Examples
life category working life
(years)
1 10 Temporary structures
2 10 to 25 Replaceable structural parts, e.g. gantry
girders, bearing
3 15 to 30 Agricultural and similar structures
4 50 Buildings structures and other common
structures
5 100 Monumental building structures, bridges,
and other civil engineering structures

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

19
15/3/2020

Section 3 : Principle of limit states design


3.2 Design situations

Persistent : - Design situation during a period of the


same order as he design working life of
the structure.
- Represents normal use

Transient: - Design situation during a period much


shorter than the design working life
of the structure.
- e.g. during execution or repair

Accidental: - Design situation involving exceptional


conditions for structure.

- e.g. Fire, explosion, impact etc

Seismic: - Design situation involving exceptional


conditions for structure during seismic
event.

20
15/3/2020

3.3 Ultimate limit states

(1)P The limit states that concern;


- the safety of people, and/or
- the safety of the structure.

3.4 Serviceability limit states

(1)P The limit states that concern;


- the functioning of the structure or structural
members under normal use;
- the comfort of people
- the appearance of the construction works.

Section 4 : Basic variables


4.1 Actions and environmental influences
4.1.1 Classification of actions

(1)P Actions shall be classified by their variations in time as follows:

- permanent actions (G), e.g. Self-weight of structures, fixed


equipment and road surfacing, and indirect actions caused
by shrinkage and uneven settlements;

- variable actions (Q), e.g. Imposed loads on building floors,


beams and roofs, wind actions or snow loads;

- accidental action (A), e.g. Explosion, or impact from


vehicles.

21
15/3/2020

For each variable actions there are four representative


values:

1. Characteristic value, (Qk) – an upper value with an


intended probability of not being exceeded or a
lower value with an intended probability of being
achieved, during some specific reference period

2. Combination value, (oQk) – value intended to take


account of a reduced probability of the
simultaneous occurrence of two or more variable
actions.

3. Frequent value, (1Qk) – value such that it should be


exceeded only for a short period of time and is used
primarily for the serviceability limit states and also
accidental limit state.

4. Quasi-permanent value, (2Qk) – value may be


exceeded for a considerable period of time;
alternatively it may be considered as an average
loading over time. It is used for a long term affects at
the SLS and also accidental and seismic ULS.

22
15/3/2020

Recommended values of  factors for buildings

Action 0 1 2

Imposed loads in buildings (see EN 1991-1-1)


Category A: domestic, residential areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category B: office areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category C: congregation areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category D: shopping areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category E: storage areas 1.0 0.9 0.8
Category F: traffic area, vehicle weight < 30 kN 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category G: traffic area, 30 kN < vehicle weight < 160 kN 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category H: roof (see EN 1991-1-1: Cl. 3.3.2) 0.7 0 0
Wind loads on buildings (see EN 1991-1-4) 0.5 0.7 0.7
Temperature (non-fire) in buildings (see EN 1991-1-5) 0.6 0.7 0.7

Representative values of variable actions

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

23
15/3/2020

Combination of actions
“Combination of action” is specifically used for the definition of
the magnitude of actions to be used when a limit state is under the
influence of different actions.

“Load cases” is concerned with the arrangement of the variable


actions to give the most unfavourable conditions.

Where there is only one variable actions (e.g. Imposed load) in a


combination, the magnitude of the actions can be obtained by
multiplying them by the appropriate factors.

Where there is more than one variable actions in combination, it is


necessary to identify the leading action(Qk,1) and other
accompanying actions (Qk,i). The accompanying actions is always
taken as the combination value.

6.4 Ultimate Limit State


The ultimate limit states are divided into the following categories;

EQU Loss of equilibrium of the structure

STR Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure or


structural member

GEO Failure due to excessive deformation of the ground

FAT Fatigue failure of the structure or structural member

For persistent and transient design situation under the STR limit
state, the Eurocode defines three possible combination as follows;

24
15/3/2020

Table A1.2(B) : Design values of actions- Ultimate limit states for


persistent and transient design situation

Accompanying variable
Permanent actions Leading
Combination actions
variable
Expression Main
Unfavourable Favourable actions Others
(if any)
Exp. (6.10) Gj,sup Gkj,sup Gj,inf Gk,j,inf Q,1Qk,1 Q,i 0,i Qk,i
Exp. (6.10a) Gj,sup Gkj,sup Gj,inf Gk,j,inf Q,1 0,1 Qk,1 Q,i 0,i Qk,i
Exp. (6.10b) Gj,sup Gkj,sup Gj,inf Gk,j,inf Q,1Qk,1 Q,i 0,i Qk,i

Notes:
1. The choice between 6.10, or 6.10a and 6.10b will be in the National annex.
2. The  and  values may be set by the National annex. The following values for 
and  are recommended when using 6.10, 6.10a and 6.10b. Gj,sup = 1.35,
Gj,inf = 1. 0 Q,1 = 1.50 where Unfavourable (0 where favourable)
Q,i = 1.50 where Unfavourable (0 where favourable)  = 0.85

Design values of actions, ultimate limit state-persistent and transient design situations

Accompanying variable
Permanent actions Leading
Combination actions
variable
Expression
actions
Main
Unfavourable Favourable Others
(if any)
Exp. (6.10) 1.35Gk 1.0Gk 1.5Qk 1.50,iQk,i
Exp. (6.10a) 1.35Gk 1.0Gk 1.50,1Qk 1.50,iQk,i
Exp. (6.10b) 0.925x1.35Gk 1.0Gk 1.5Qk 1.50,iQk,i

Note:
1. Design for either Exp.(6.10) or the less favourable of Exp. (6.10a) and (6.10b)
2. The terms favorable and unfavorable refer to the effect of the action on the design situation under consideration.
For example, if a beam, continuous over several spans, is to be designed for largest sagging bending moment it
will have to sustain any action that has the effect of increasing the bending moment will be considered unfavorable
whilst any action that reduces the bending moment will be considered to be favourable.

25
15/3/2020

Table A1.4 : Design values of actions- Serviceability limit states

Permanent actions, Gd Variable actions, Qd


Combination

Unfavourable Favourable Leading Others

Characteristic Gkj,sup Gk,j,inf Qk,1 0,i Qk,i

Frequent Gkj,sup Gk,j,inf 1,1 Qk,1 2,i Qk,i

Quasi-
Gkj,sup Gk,j,inf 2,1 Qk,1 2,i Qk,i
permanent

Design values of actions, serviceability limit states

Permanent actions Variable actions


Combination Example of use
Unfavourable Favourable Leading Others

Characteristic 1.0Gk 1.0Gk Qk,1 0,iQk,i


Cracking –
Frequent 1.0Gk 1.0Gk 1,1Qk,1 2,1Qk,i prestressed
concrete
Quasi-
1.0Gk 1.0Gk 2,1Qk,1 2,1Qk,i Deflection
permanent

26
15/3/2020

PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN SARAWAK (PPKS)


SARAWAK SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SSDC)

EN 1991 :EUROCODE 1
Actions on Structures

By :
Ir. Mohamad Salleh Yassin
School of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

EN 1991
EUROCODE 1 : ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES
EN 1991-1-1 Densities, self weight and imposed loads
EN 1991-1-2 Actions on structures exposed to fire
EN 1991-1-3 Snow loads
EN 1991-1-4 Wind loads
EN 1991-1-5 Thermal loads
EN 1991-1-6 Actions during execution
EN 1991-1-7 Accidental actions
EN 1991-2 Traffic loads on bridges

EN 1991-3 Actions induced by cranes and machinery

EN 1991-4 Silos and tanks

27
15/3/2020

EN 1991-1-1
Contents

Section 1 General
Section 2 Classification of actions
Section 3 Design situations
Densities of construction and stored
Section 4
materials

Section 5 Self-weight of construction works

Section 6 Imposed load on buildings

Tables for nominal density of construction


Annex A materials, and nominal density and angle of
repose of stored materials

Annex B Vehicle barriers and parapets for car parks


Jambatan
Logi Rawatan Air

Density of construction materials

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

28
15/3/2020

Density of construction materials

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Density of stored materials

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

29
15/3/2020

Imposed load

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

30
15/3/2020

Category of loaded area

A1: All usages within self-contained dwelling units


A
Area for domestic and residential A2: Bedrooms and dormitories
activities
A3 : Bedrooms in hotels, hospital

B B1: General use


Office area B2: At or below ground floor level
C11: Areas with tables – dining rooms
C
Areas where people may C13: Areas with tables -Classrooms
congregate
C22: Area with fixed seat – Assembly areas
D
D1: Areas in general retail shops
Shopping areas

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

31
15/3/2020

Load values with various


intensities of people loading
Imposed load

1.5 kN/m2 : 8 persons in a space 4m2 2.0 kN/m2 : 11 persons in a space 4m2

3.0 kN/m2 : 17 persons in a space 4m2 4.0 kN/m2 : 22 persons in a space 4m2

32
15/3/2020

5.0 kN/m2 : 28 persons in a space 4m2

THANK YOU

33
15/3/2020

PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN SARAWAK (PPKS)


SARAWAK SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SSDC)

EN 1992:
EUROCODE 2: Design of
Concrete Structures

By:
Ir. Mohamad Salleh Yassin
School of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

EN 1992

EUROCODE 2 : DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES

EN 1992-1-1 General rules and rules for buildings

EN 1992-1-2 General rules – Structural fire design

EN 1992-2 Concrete bridges – design and detailing rules

EN 1992-3 Liquid retaining and containment structures

34
15/3/2020

EN 1992-1-1
Contents:

1 General
2 Basis of design
3 Materials
4 Durability and cover to reinforcement
5 Structural analysis
6 Ultimate limit states (ULS)
7 Serviceability limit states (SLS)
8 Detailing of reinforcement & prestressing
tendons -General
9 Detailing of members and particular rules
10 Additional rules for precast structures
11 Lightweight aggregated concrete
structures
12 Plain and lightly reinforced concrete
structures

Key differences of EC2


 EC2 is generally laid out to give advice on the
basis of phenomena (e.g. bending, shear etc)
rather than by member type as in BS 8110 (e.g.
beams, slabs, columns etc).
 Design is based on characteristic cylinder
strength not cube strength.
 EC2 does not provide derived formulae (e.g.
for bending only the details of the stress block
are expressed)

35
15/3/2020

Key differences of EC2

Key differences of EC2


Table 1.4: Concrete strength classes and modulus of elasticity

Concrete Characteristic Characteristic Modulus of


strength class cylinder strength cube strength elasticity E cm
f ck (N/mm2) f ck,cube (N/mm2) (kN/mm2)
C20/25 20 25 30
C25/30 25 30 31
C30/37 30 37 33
C35/45 35 45 34
C40/50 40 50 35
C45/55 45 55 36
C50/55 50 60 37
C55/67 55 67 38
C60/75 60 75 39

36
15/3/2020

Key differences of EC2

Key differences of EC2


 Units for stress are mega pascals, MPa
(1 MPa = 1 N/mm2)
 EC2 uses comma for a decimal point.
 One thousandth is represent by %.
 The partial safety factor for steel reinforcement is
1.15. The characteristic yield strength is 500 Mpa.
 There is no guidance on plain steel bar or mild
steel reinforcement.

37
15/3/2020

Key differences of EC2


 The effects of geometric imperfection are
considered in addition to lateral loads.
 Minimum concrete cover is related to bond
strength, durability and fire resistance. There
is allowance for deviations due to variations
in execution.
 Higher strengths of concrete are covered
by EC 2, up to class C90/105.

 The “variable strut inclination” method is used for the assessment


 of the shear capacity of a section.

38
15/3/2020

Key differences of EC2

 Serviceability checks can still carried out


using ‘deemed to satisfy’ span to effective
depth rules similar to BS 8110.

 The rules for determining the anchorage


and lap length are more complex than the
simple tables in BS 8110.


Key differences of EC2
The punching shear checks are carried out at 2d from the
face of the column and for a rectangular column, the
perimeter is rounded at the corners.

39
15/3/2020

PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN SARAWAK (PPKS)


SARAWAK SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SSDC)

MALAYSIAN
NATIONAL ANNEXES

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

40
15/3/2020

 Technical Committee (IEM-SWO) for Standards in


Design of Concrete Structures, recommends
the adoption of EC2 in totality with national annex
& NCCI and the relevant parts of EC0, EC1 and EC2.

 Eurocodes allow for country to make their national


choices where standard gives values with notes.

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

 The committee have prepared Malaysian National


Annexes to MS EN 1990: 2009, MS 1991-1-1: 2009
and MS EN 1992-1-1: 2009.

 Hence we have these National Annexes which


contain Malaysia Determined Parameters for use
in design of buildings and civil engineering works.

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

41
15/3/2020

The following sub-clauses in MS EN1990: 2009 where


national choice are made,

A1.2.1(1) on Combination of actions


A1.2.2 Table A1.1 Values of ψ factors for buildings
A1.3.1(1) Tables A1.2(A) to (C) on Design values of
actions
A1.3.1(5) on Design of structural members (footings,
piles, basement wall etc.
A1.3.2 Table A.1.3 on Design values of seismic &
accidental actions

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Table A1.1: Recommended values of  factors for buildings

Action 0 1 2
Imposed loads in buildings (see EN 1991-1-1)
Category A: domestic, residential areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category B: office areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category C: congregation areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category D: shopping areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category E: storage areas 1.0 0.9 0.8
Category F: traffic area, vehicle weight < 30 kN 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category G: traffic area, 30 kN < vehicle weight < 200 kN 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category H: roof (see EN 1991-1-1: Cl. 3.3.2) 0.7 0 0
Wind loads on buildings (see MS 1553: 2002) 0.5 0.7 0.7
Temperature (non-fire) in buildings (see EN 1991-1-5) 0.6 0.7 0.7
* See also MS EN 1991-1-1: Clause 3.3.2(1)
Jambatan

42
15/3/2020

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

43
15/3/2020

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

44
15/3/2020

DESIGN OF RC BUILDINGS WITH EUROCODES


MS EN 1990
EN 206 Basis of Structural Design MS EN 1991
Specifying Concrete Action on Structures
Part 1-1-1: Densities,
MS EN 1992 selfweight, imposed load
Design of Concrete Structures Part 1-1-2: Fire
EN 10080 Part 1-1-4: Wind
Reinforcing Steels

EN 13670
Execution of Structures Part 1-1: General & Buildings National Annexs
Part 1-2: Fire Design

PD 6687-1 (Part 1)
MS EN 1998 MS EN 1997 PD 6687-2 (Part 2)
Seismic design Geotechnical design

DESIGN OF CONCRETE BRIDGES WITH EUROCODES


MS EN 1990
EN 206 Basis of Structural Design MS EN 1991
Specifying Concrete Action on Structures
Part 1-1-1: Densities,
MS EN 1992 selfweight, imposed load
Design of Concrete Structures Part 1-1-4: Wind
EN 10080 Part 2: Traffic loads
Reinforcing Steels

EN 13670
Execution of Structures Part 1-1: General & Buildings National Annexs
Part 2: Bridge design

MS EN 1998 MS EN 1997 PD 6687-1 (Part 1)


Seismic design Geotechnical design PD 6687-2 (Part 2)

45
15/3/2020

DESIGN OF RC WATER TANKS WITH EUROCODES


MS EN 1990
EN 206 Basis of Structural Design
Specifying Concrete MS EN 1991
Action on Structures

MS EN 1992 Part 1-1-1: Densities,


Design of Concrete Structures selfweight, imposed load
EN 10080
Part 4: Silo & Tank
Reinforcing Steels

EN 13670
Execution of Structures Part 1-1: General & Buildings National Annexs
Part 3: Liquid retaining structures

PD 6687-1 (Part 1)
MS EN 1998 MS EN 1997
PD 6687-2 (Part 2)
Seismic design Geotechnical design

End of Lecture 1

Thank You

Logi Rawatan Air Jambatan

46

You might also like