Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Serviceability Limit State

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

15/3/2020

PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN SARAWAK (PPKS)


SARAWAK SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SSDC)

SERVICEABILITY
Serviceability Limit State

By:
Ir. Mohamad Salleh Yassin
School of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

INTRODUCTION

 In order to serves its intended


purpose, a structure must be safe and
serviceable.

 Serviceability, implies that


deformation of structures such as
deflections, cracking and other
distortions under load shall not be
excessive

1
15/3/2020

Deflection

 Excessive deflection lead to sagging of


floor, crushing of partitions, buckling of
glass enclosures, ill lifting doors and
windows, poor drainage, misalignment of
machinery and excessive vibration.

Damage in masonry wall due to excessive deflection of lintel

2
15/3/2020

Deflection of ECC specimen,

3
15/3/2020

 For control of deflection, two alternative


methods are described in EC2 clause 7.4:

1. Limiting span to depth ratios


(Clause 7.4.2)

2. Calculation of actual deflection


(Clause 7.4.3)

 Deflection limit:

1. final deflection of a beam, slab or cantilever


subjected to quasi-permanent loads should not
exceed span/250

2. for the deflection which takes place after the


application of finishes or fixing of partition
should not exceed span/500 to avoid damage
to fixtures and fittings.

4
15/3/2020

Limiting (span / depth) ratio

(L/d)actual ≤ (L/d)allowable

(L/d)allowable = (L/d)basic x f1 x f2 x f3

Basic (span / depth) ratio


The basic span-effective depth ratios, to control
deflection to a maximum of span/250 are given in EC2
as;

l  o  o  
3/ 2

 K 11  1.5 f ck  3.2 f ck   1  if ρ ≤ ρo


d     

l  o 1 ' 
 K 11  1.5 f ck  f ck  if ρ > ρo .
d     ' 12  

5
15/3/2020

where:

K is the factor to take into account the different


in structural system
ρo is the reference reinforcement ratio = 10-3
f ck

ρ is the required tension reinforcement ratio


= As,req / bd

ρ’ is the required compression reinforcement ratio


= As’,req / bd

Table 4.1: Basic span/effective depth ratio (fyk = 500 N/mm2, C30/35 Concrete)

Basic span-effective depth ratio

Structural System K Concrete highly Concrete lightly


stressed, ρ = stressed, ρ =
1.5% 0.5%
1. Simply supported beam, one/two way
simply supported slab 1.0 14 20
2. End span of continuous beam or one-
way continuous slab or two way
1.3 18 26
spanning slab continuous over one long
side
3. Interior span of beam or one way or two
way spanning slab 1.5 20 30
4. Slab supported on columns without
beam (flat slab) based on longer span 1.2 17 24

5. Cantilever 0.4 6 8

6
15/3/2020

The basic ratios are modified in particular cases as follows:


 f1
For flange section where the ratio of the flange width to the web
width exceeds 3, the values should be multiplied by 0.8.

 f2
For beam and slabs, other than flat slab, with spans exceeding 7
m, which support partitions liable to be damaged by excessive
deflection, the values should be multiplied by 7/span.

 f3
Where more tension reinforcement is provided (As,prov) than
that calculated (As, req), multiply the values by As,prov/As,req.
(upper limit = 1.5)

Cracking

Cracks are induced in reinforced concrete elements as a result of:

 flexural tensile stress due to bending under applied loads;

 diagonal tension stress due to shear under applied load;

 volume changes due to shrinkage, creep, thermal and


chemical effects; and

 splitting along reinforcement due to bond and anchorage failure.

7
15/3/2020

Tension Crack

Flexural Cracking Thermal Cracking

8
15/3/2020

 The primary objective of crack control is to


limit the width of individual cracks.

 This is required not only for aesthetic


reasons, more importantly, for durability
and particularly for corrosion protection of
reinforcement.

For control of crack, two alternative methods


are described in EC2 clause 7.3.

1. Control of cracking without direct


calculation, (Clause 7.3.3)

2. Calculation of crack widths (Clause 7.3.4)

9
15/3/2020

Control of Cracking
Crack width

Wactual ≤ Wallowable

Bar spacing

Sactual ≤ Sallowable

Limiting crack width :

 In the absence of specific requirements


(e.g. water tightness) the crack width may be
limited to 0.3 mm in all exposure classes under
quasi-permanent combination of loads.

 In the absence of requirements for


appearance, this limit may be relaxed to 0.4 mm
for exposure classes X0 and XC1.

10
15/3/2020

Control of cracking without direction


calculation.
 Minimum reinforcement area

As, min = kc k fct, eff Act / fyk

 Maximum spacing of reinforcement

 Maximum bar size

Table 4.2: Maximum bar spacing for crack control

Steel stress Maximum bar spacing (mm)


(N/mm2) wk = 0.4 mm wk = 0.3 mm
160 300 300
200 300 250
240 250 200
280 200 150
320 150 100
360 100 50
f yk Gk  0.3Qk 1
fs  x
1.15 (1.35Gk  1.5Qk ) 

11
15/3/2020

Table 4.3: Maximum bar diameters for crack control

Steel stress (N/mm2) Maximum bar size (mm)


wk = 0.4 mm wk = 0.3 mm
160 40 32
200 32 25
240 20 16
280 16 12
320 12 10
360 10 8
400 8 6
450 6 5
f yk Gk  0.3Qk 1
fs  x
1.15 (1.35Gk  1.5Qk ) 

12

You might also like