opening repertoire

1 d4 with 2 c4
Cyrus Lakdawala

www.everymanchess.com
 About the Author

Cyrus Lakdawala is an International Master, a former National Open and American Open
Champion, and a six-time State Champion. He has been teaching chess for over 30 years,
and coaches some of the top junior players in the U.S.

Also by the Author:

Play the London System
A Ferocious Opening Repertoire
The Slav: Move by Move
1...d6: Move by Move
The Caro-Kann: Move by Move
The Four Knights: Move by Move
Capablanca: Move by Move
The Modern Defence: Move by Move
Kramnik: Move by Move
The Colle: Move by Move
The Scandinavian: Move by Move
Botvinnik: Move by Move
The Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Move by Move
Korchnoi: Move by Move
The Alekhine Defence: Move by Move
The Trompowsky Attack: Move by Move
Carlsen: Move by Move
The Classical French: Move by Move
Larsen: Move by Move
1...b6: Move by Move
Bird’s Opening: Move by Move
Petroff Defence: Move by Move
Fischer: Move by Move
Anti-Sicilians: Move by Move
Opening Repertoire: ...c6
First Steps: the Modern
Caruana: Move by Move
Contents

About the Author 3

Bibliography 5
Introduction 7

1 The Nimzo-Indian Defence 15

2 The King’s Indian Defence 78
3 The Grünfeld Defence 131
4 Benoni Defences 158
5 The Benko Gambit 193
6 The Queen’s Gambit Declined 212
7 The Queen’s Gambit: the Chigorin and the Albin 279
8 The Queen’s Gambit Accepted 296
9 The Semi-Slav and Slav Defences 317
10 The Dutch Defence 367
11 The Modern Defence 386
12 The Budapest Gambit 404
13 The Old Indian, 1...d6, and the English Defence 420

Index of Variations 442

Index of Complete Games 447
 Introduction

Tony’s Guinea Pig: The Experiment

This is my 40th chess book and, like other people who turn 40, I’m going through a mid-life
(chess) crisis, where the guy who has been married for 15 years suddenly buys a Porsche
and dumps his loving wife to run off with a new girlfriend, 19 years his junior. It came
about when my buddy IM Tony Saidy sent an admonishing email about my opening
choices. He politely opined that I was a disgrace to the white pieces with my choices of the
London and Colle Systems and Ulf Andersson’s ultra-safe 1 Ìf3 instant endgame reper-
toire. I long ago abandoned the root of all evil, a craving for complications, but Tony
claimed that my opening choices lacked arable land in which to be creative. Tony argued
that, for decades, my opening choices have been kissing simplicity’s butt, in a naked dis-
play of sycophancy which hasn’t been seen in the world since Henry VIII’s wives (or at least
that is how I interpreted his email!). He insisted that this trend must end and that I take up
an aggressive 1 d4 and 2 c4! repertoire.
Tony’s suggestion sounded to me like something from the Island of Dr. Moreau, where the
mad scientist breeds lizards and gorillas with humans to produce a new, more powerful race.
When it comes to sharp opening lines your writer is a chess Napoleon: in retreat from my many
Moscows, since I tend to operate on the very reasonable assumption that in complex positions
all my opponents see more than I do. Our unique style is the barrier which separates us from
the rest of chess humanity and I argued to Tony that a realization of our own limitations is a
form of wisdom which keeps us safe from tempting yet foolhardy decisions.
But he insisted that I switch to 1 d4 and 2 c4, adding: “Always attack! Never overex-
tend!” (Tony should seriously consider switching to decaf!) He argued that it is foolish to
live a simple life of Londons, Colles, et al. for a person who is theoretically competent. I ad-
mit that my opening choices remind people of unimaginative dog owners who name their
pets Spot, Fido, Rover, and Shep. And my openings do provide a wide scope for the imagi-
nation, just as long as you don’t have much imagination! My problem is underextending,
not overextending. Now, at an age when senior moments arrive uninvited and without
warning, I’m suddenly supposed to turn into a brawler! Fine. I agreed to try a far sharper 1
d4 and 2 c4!? repertoire for the next few months – although Tony’s vast ambition may far
exceed my ability to implement it, and if I end up as the first 1300-rated IM in history, my
blood will be on his hands.

7
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

Chess books are filled with ideas we believe we understand, yet don’t. This sometimes
applies to the author as well. Can the exciting past be a remedy to our boring present? I
haven’t played a sharp 1 d4 and 2 c4 system regularly since the early 1980s, so you can say
I’m a bit rusty. With old age comes a loss of our former confidence and an increase in cau-
tion, and my philosophy has been that the more distrusting of sharp lines I am, the longer I
will survive. With this book I’m working on an attempt to reverse the process. So there
won’t be any lines for White for those with a puritanical streak, who object to any form of
fun or happiness. Tell me something and I forget; let me experience it and I learn. So I plan
on taking Tony’s advice and trying out this rather scary repertoire – and so far it has far
exceeded expectations.
That is why I wrote this book. Not in my wildest imaginings did I foresee the immensity
of Black’s responses to 1 d4 and 2 c4. The museum of memory (mine at least) has limited
storage space. The only way to learn such a wide-ranging repertoire is through a mixture
of memorization and – more importantly – a conceptual understanding of the underlying
concepts. I have tried my best to incorporate both for the club player in this book.
When it comes to our opening choices, we sometimes tend to gravitate toward the
trendy, without contemplating whether we have the aptitude and stylistic capacity to pull
them off or not. But there is no “best” when it comes to our opening repertoire, only the
“best fitting” counts. If you choose to play the one in this book, you should possess the fol-
lowing qualifications:

1. If you are a theory hater, this repertoire may not be right for you. The lines tend to be
high-maintenance intricate dances, whose steps you need to commit to memory. So the
player suited for this book must be unafraid to study lengthy theory and, just as impor-
tantly, update it for improvements and alterations for both sides.

2. You must be prepared to take on the part of the class bully – and enjoy it! You are an
aggressively-minded player, who craves confrontation, both strategic and tactical.
If you qualify for both, then the repertoire in this book may be well suited for you.

Mapping out lines is the cartographer’s toughest task and a good general is wise to
memorize the potential battlefield first before engaging the enemy. I set up this repertoire
via reversed engineering, placing myself as Black and asking the question: “Which White
line do I fear most?” Here are the lines I advocate in the book:

8
 Introduction

Nimzo-Indian Defence: 4 f3
W________W
[rhb1kDW4]
[0pDWDp0p]
[WDWDpDWD]
[DW)nDWDW]
[WDWDWDWD]
[)W)WDPDW]
[WDWDPDP)]
[$WGQIBHR]
W--------W
Our side deliberately takes on three isolanis, two of them doubled. Okay, I can see from
the look on your faces that I am going to have to sell this with the fervour of a carnival
pitch man. I would usually launch into a lengthy and pious homily on the evils of an un-
clean structure. Not this time though, as I’m beginning to see the light and realize that
White’s activity and bishops clearly compensate. It was Nimzowitsch who taught that a
move’s power is derived not from its outer beauty but from its inner efficiency, and our
last move 8 dxc5 fully qualifies.
The position above arose after 7 cxd5 Ìxd5, by the way. If Black recaptures instead with
7...exd5, we get to own a central preponderance of pawns to go with our bishop pair. After
Black castles short, we normally set up with Íd3, Ìe2, 0-0, Ìg3 and play for an e3-e4
break, usually followed by a kingside attack.

King’s Indian Defence: Petrosian System

W________W
[rhb1W4kD]
[0p0WDpgp]
[WDW0WhpD]
[DWDP0WDW]
[WDPDPDWD]
[DWHWDNDW]
[P)WDB)P)]
[$WGQIWDR]
W--------W
9
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

Our associations tend to alter with time. I bet more people associate the name “Ti-
berius” with Captain James Kirk than they do with the ancient Roman Emperor. One which
never seems to change in chess is the association of Tigran Petrosian with mastery of
closed positions. For the King’s Indian I advocate his line which is easy to learn and greatly
cuts down on your study.
In the diagram we arrive at an irreconcilable dichotomy of belief systems, reminiscent
of Marlon Brando’s speech from On the Waterfront: “My philosophy in life: Do it to him be-
fore he does it to you!” Black believes White will get mated, whereas we as White believe
we will infiltrate and plunder Black’s queenside, all the while keeping our king matelessly
safe. Black can easily end up feeling like someone in a crowded and stalled lift stuck be-
tween floors.

Grünfeld Defence: Pseudo-London

W________W
[rhb1kDW4]
[0p0W0pgp]
[WDWDWhpD]
[DWDpDWDW]
[WDP)WGWD]
[DWHWDNDW]
[P)WDP)P)]
[$WDQIBDR]
W--------W
Welcome to the not-quite-London-System. Just remember: the best mob hitmen don’t
look like hitmen. They come with bland, anonymous faces that easily blend into a crowd.
This line is just such a mob enforcer, with a quiet exterior and ruthless interior.

Modern Benoni: Flick Knife Variation

I have always believed that people who embrace the black side of a Benoni have a subcon-
scious desire to die young. So let’s help them out and make their wish come true by chal-
lenging them with the ruthless Flick Knife line, which to my mind is a grave danger to Black
in the Benoni. The word “primitive” tends to come with negative connotations. Yet we have
all seen refined players go down in flames against a barbarian’s vicious attack, which is
exactly the route we plan to take to our opponents.

10
 Introduction

W________W
[rDbDkDW4]
[0pDnDpDp]
[WDWDPDpD]
[DB0PDWDW]
[WDWDWDWD]
[DW)WGW)W]
[PDWDWDWD]
[$WDQIWHq]
W--------W
Have you ever been inside a carnival house of mirrors, where you become so disoriented
that you aren’t sure which of the images is the real you? The above diagram is a book posi-
tion from this variation. It may seem incomprehensible at first, yet the comp’s help and
repeated study, mixed with over-the-board application, gives rise to confidence. White is
heavily favoured, as long as you thoroughly know around 24 moves of theory!

Benko Gambit Declined: 5 f3

Black’s ...b7-b5 sacrifice, the insignia of the Benko Gambit’s office, fails to measure up to
normal heroic standards because it’s 100% sound. In this book I advocate initiative over
material, so we turn down most of our opponents’ gambits like a bedspread. Since accept-
ing the Benko pawn would indenture us to servile defence for the next 30 moves or so, the
best way to gain the initiative here is to decline it.
W________W
[rhWDkgn4]
[DbDpDp0p]
[pDWDWDWD]
[DP1N)WDW]
[WDpDWDWD]
[DWHWDPDW]
[P)WDQDP)]
[$WGWIBDR]
W--------W
If you decide to enter this line of the Benko, then expect a lifespan of less than 50 years,

11
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

as the stress from playing (and studying!) ages you prematurely. Are you confused yet? I
am. There is very little – if anything at all – which can be defined in this position as “nor-
mal”. For the sacrificed piece White gets wicked compensation.

Queen’s Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation

W________W
[rhb1kgW4]
[0p0WDp0p]
[WDWDWhWD]
[DWDpDWGW]
[WDW)WDWD]
[DWHWDWDW]
[P)WDP)P)]
[$WDQIBHR]
W--------W
Don’t think for a moment that the old-school Exchange against the Queen’s Gambit De-
clined is a shrine to obsolescence, since it is the common choice of top players even today.
Unlike other Exchange Variations, such as in the French or Slav, when we play the Ex-
change against the Queen’s Gambit Declined, we are actually choosing a rather sharp line.
Our plan: e2-e3, Íd3, Ëc2, Ìge2, 0-0 and then aim for an f2-f3 and e3-e4 central break.

Queen’s Gambit Accepted: Botvinnik System

W________W
[rhb1kgW4]
[DpDWDp0p]
[pDWDphWD]
[DW0WDWDW]
[PDB)WDWD]
[DWDW)NDW]
[W)WDW)P)]
[$NGQDRIW]
W--------W
Black will soon play ...c5xd4, giving us a d4-isolani when we recapture with our e-pawn,

12
 Introduction

which is both a source of strategic concern and attacking hope. Tony sent me a brilliant
attacking game by Pal Benko (the first one in Chapter Eight) and told me this is how chess
should be played. So I will try not to look at that gaping hole on b4 and get on with attack-
ing Black with my soon-to-be isolated queen’s pawn.

Slav and Semi-Slav: Meran System

Against the ultra-solid Semi-Slav, let’s go for the sharp lines of the Meran with e2-e3. We
may soon reach the position below:
W________W
[WDr1kgW4]
[0bDnDp0p]
[WDWDpDWD]
[DBDnDWDW]
[N0WHWDWD]
[DPDWDWDW]
[PDWDW)P)]
[$WGQ$WIW]
W--------W
I used to believe that Black stood slightly better in the above variation. That changed
when I noticed a relatively new idea for White: the just played b2-b3, which poses Black
new problems, and if ...Íe7 we have Îxe6!.
Note that we also play an early e2-e3 against the Slav, forestalling attempts by Black to
grab the c4-pawn and defend it with ...b7-b5.

Dutch Defence
I have a nicotine-addicted friend who has been a smoker for over four decades. Every time
we meet he announces that he will quit “someday”. We both know he is lying. I have a few
students too who have told me they want to kick the Dutch Defence habit, yet they always
return.

13
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

W________W
[rhb1kDW4]
[0p0p0Wgp]
[WDWDWhpD]
[DWDWDpDP]
[WDP)WDWD]
[DWHWDWDW]
[P)WDP)PD]
[$WGQIBHR]
W--------W
The above position arises in the Leningrad Dutch, where we get rough and treat it with
great disrespect by pushing our h-pawn. If Black plays ...Ìxh5, we are happy to sacrifice the
exchange.

Those are just some of the main variations we will meet in this book. As we will see,
Black has numerous other options too. In all cases may we deliver mate and send our op-
ponents home early with our 1 d4 and 2 c4! repertoire.

Cyrus Lakdawala,
San Diego,
March 2019.

14
 Chapter One
The Nimzo-Indian Defence

Fear of the Nimzo-Indian kept me away from playing 1 d4 and 2 c4 for about 35 years.
Now with the emergence of the 4 f3! Pseudo-Sämisch (4 a3 is the Sämisch proper), I’m back
on board (talk about a late bloomer!). It is a more dynamic alternative to the overanalysed
4 Ëc2 (Capablanca) and 4 e3 (Rubinstein); it recently moved into theoretical prominence
when Magnus Carlsen landed in difficulties as Black against Anand and Nakamura. These
two games are featured in the chapter, even though Carlsen, either through witchcraft or a
pact with the devil, miraculously won both.

Game 1
V.Anand-Wang Hao
Wijk aan Zee 2011

1 d4 Ìf6 2 c4 e6 3 Ìc3 Íb4

This pin is the characteristic move of the Nimzo-Indian. Note that Black can also play
3...d5, transposing to the Queen’s Gambit Declined (see Chapter Six); or 3...c5, where we
push past with 4 d5, transposing to the Modern Benoni (see Chapter Four).
4 f3

15
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

W________W
[rhb1kDW4]
[0p0pDp0p]
[WDWDphWD]
[DWDWDWDW]
[WgP)WDWD]
[DWHWDPDW]
[P)WDPDP)]
[$WGQIBHR]
W--------W
Bob Dylan was right, I suppose – the times they really are a-changin’. Nobody played 4
f3 against the Nimzo back in the early 1980s, whereas in 2011 GM Alex Baburin called this
move White’s new main line. I actually think it’s White’s only way to try and play for an
advantage, since both 4 Ëc2 and 4 e3, the Capablanca and Rubinstein variations, have
been worked out to kingdom come, with Black achieving equality at the end. The popular-
ity of 4 f3 is relatively recent, so I’m guessing your Nimzo-Indian opponents won’t be as
prepared as they would be for the others. My proof? I tested White in this position against
several of my students who play Nimzo-Indian as Black. All of them are competent against
4 Ëc2 and 4 e3. When I hit them with 4 f3, the lot of them demonstrated they didn’t have a
strong grasp on the key ideas and all went under in the practice games shockingly easily,
without putting up much of a fight. Most had even studied the theory but just lacked ex-
perience against the line and played it without true understanding. So I’m predicting that,
at club level, most of your opponents may do the same.
The intentions of our last move are as follows:
1. White prepares to seize total control over the centre with e2-e4.
2. White prevents ...Ìe4 ideas.
3. If Black fianchettoes with ...b7-b6, as in many other Nimzo-Indians, the b7-bishop hits
a white pawn wall on e4 or f3.
4. If Black castles kingside, which is the case nearly 100% of the time, then White’s f2-f3
can be useful preparation for an attack/expansion with g2-g4.
4...d5
Black’s main alternatives, 4...c5 and 4...0-0, are covered in Games 6-10.
Others:
a) 4...Ìc6 5 e4 d5 6 cxd5 exd5 7 e5 Ìg8 (the knight re-routes to e7) 8 Íe3 Ìge7 9 f4 0-0
10 Ìf3 Íxc3+!? (10...Ìa5 11 Íd3 Ìc4 12 Ëe2 also looks good for White) 11 bxc3 f5
(11...Íf5 12 Íe2 Ëd7 13 Ìd2! and g2-g4 should make Black nervous) 12 Íc1!, F.Berkes-
Z.Medvegy, Hungarian Championship, Heviz 2012. Black found himself short on space and

16
 The Nimzo-Indian Defence

may have trouble dealing with White’s now unopposed dark-squared bishop, which is
headed for a3.
b) 4...Íxc3+ (White often encourages this with a2-a3, so we should be delighted when
Black captures unprovoked) 5 bxc3 d6 6 e4 Ìfd7 7 Íd3 b6 8 f4! Ìc6 9 Ìf3 Ìa5 10 0-0 Ía6
11 Ëe2 Ëe7 12 Íe3, S.Arkhipov-B.Gurgenidze, Tbilisi 1986. White’s space and bishop pair
easily outweigh Black’s slight pressure on c4.
c) 4...Ìh5 (threatening ...Ëh4+, which White easily covers) 5 Ìh3 f5 6 e3 0-0 7 Íd2 Ìc6
8 a3 Íe7 9 Íe2 d6, E.Gasanov-I.Turova, Dubai 2009. White’s fluid centre and extra space
offer our side a comfortable edge.
d) 4...b6 5 e4 Íxc3+ 6 bxc3 d6 7 Íd3 e5 8 Ìe2 0-0 9 Íg5 Ìc6 10 0-0 h6 11 Íe3 Îe8 12
Ìg3 Ìa5 13 Ëe2 (covering the c4-pawn against ...Ía6 ideas) 13...Ëe7, D.Khismatullin-
H.Simonian, Minsk 2008. White’s position looks promising with the plan Îae1, h2-h3 and
then either an f2-f4 break or attacking Black’s king by moving our knight on g3 and playing
for g2-g4.
5 a3
We want the bishop pair and are willing to expend resources to get it.
5...Íxc3+
Later in the chapter we look at Carlsen’s introverted choice 5...Íe7.
6 bxc3 c5
The usual move. 6...0-0 7 cxd5 exd5 8 e3 c5 transposes to Game 4, whereas 6...dxc4 7 e4
b5 is a bit greedy. I played White against a master in a casual blitz game recently and I was
shocked at how easily my position improved after 8 a4 c6 9 Ía3. White’s bishop pair, dark
square control, strong centre and the fact that Black is unable to castle are far more mean-
ingful than the not-so-great extra pawn.
W________W
[rhb1kDW4]
[0pDWDp0p]
[WDWDphWD]
[DW0pDWDW]
[WDP)WDWD]
[)W)WDPDW]
[WDWDPDP)]
[$WGQIBHR]
W--------W
7 cxd5
We arrive at a collision of world views. I prefer this move which violates one principle:
Don’t open the game when behind in development, while following another: Open the posi-

17
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

tion when you own the bishop pair.

White can also play 7 e3 first, after which 7...0-0 8 cxd5 exd5 is Game 4 again. Naturally,
8...Ìxd5 is possible here too. C.Holst-Cu.Andersson, correspondence 1977, continued 9 Íd2
f5 10 Íd3 Ìc6 11 f4! (discouraging ...e6-e5) 11...b6 12 Ìf3 Íb7 13 0-0 Îc8, when White
looks a shade better after 14 Ëe2 Ëd6 15 c4 Ìf6 16 Íc3 cxd4 17 exd4.
7...Ìxd5
Black’s other critical choice, 7...exd5, is examined in Games 3 and 4.
8 dxc5!
W________W
[rhb1kDW4]
[0pDWDp0p]
[WDWDpDWD]
[DW)nDWDW]
[WDWDWDWD]
[)W)WDPDW]
[WDWDPDP)]
[$WGQIBHR]
W--------W
I know what you’re thinking: “Man, those are a pair of ugly babies on c3 and c5!” Believe
it or not, this structure-busting pawn grab is White’s main line. If taking on a structural
weakness is a burden, then why are we inviting more? The answer is the more open our
position gets, the more powerful our bishops become. So we don’t interpret our wonky
structure as some flaw in need of correction. 8 dxc5 represents a definitional alteration on
how the white side of the Nimzo-Indian is normally played. We won’t consider other
moves, such as 8 Ëd3 or 8 Ëd2, in this book.
8...Ëa5
Next game we look at 8...f5. Because the line is still slightly under the radar, our Pseudo-
Sämisch can even throw masters off: 8...0-0? 9 e4 Ìxc3? 10 Ëb3 Ëd4? (10...Ìxe4 11 fxe4
Ëd4 was necessary; even there Black doesn’t get enough for the piece) 11 Íb2 Ëe3+ 12
Íe2 Ìd5 was C.Lakdawala-B.Baker, San Diego (rapid) 2008, and now the simple 13 Ëxe3! (I
moved my queen to c4, which is still winning) 13...Ìxe3 14 Êf2 wins a piece for only one
pawn, since 14...Ìc2 is met by 15 Îc1 and the knight has no place to go.
9 e4!
We are happy to give away our c3-pawn. Indeed, it is unwise for Black to take it, as after
9...Ìxc3?! 10 Ëd2 Ìc6 11 Íb2 Ìa4 12 Ëxa5 Ìxa5 13 Íxg7 Îg8 14 Íf6 Ìxc5 15 Ìh3,
K.Honfi-A.Gunsberger, European Team Championship, Bucharest 1960, White’s bishop pair
and strength on the dark squares offer our side a clear advantage in the ending.

18
 The Nimzo-Indian Defence

9...Ìe7
If 9...Ìf6 10 Íe3! 0-0 (after 10...Ëxc3+?! 11 Êf2 Black lost time and didn’t hurt our posi-
tion a bit) 11 Ëb3 Ìfd7, we play 12 a4! Ëc7 (12...Ìxc5? 13 Ëb4 Ëxb4 14 cxb4 is an awful
ending for Black, who must suffer against White’s bishop pair and space) 13 Ëa3 b6 14 a5!
(forcing Black to recapture on c5 with the b-pawn) 14...bxc5 15 a6! c4 16 Ëa5 Ìxa6 17
Ëxc7 Ìxc7 18 Íxc4 a5 19 Íe2 f5 20 exf5 exf5 21 Ìh3, as in Ding Liren-P.Leko, Beijing
(rapid) 2012, where White milked his bishop pair to a win.
10 Íe3 0-0
Once again we are happy to give away our c3-pawn. After 10...Ëxc3+ 11 Êf2 Ìbc6 12
Íd3 Ëf6 13 Ìe2 Íd7 14 h4! h6 15 Ìf4 Îd8 16 g4!, M.Noble-L.Wellen, correspondence
2011, Black’s position looks uncomfortable as it may be too scary to castle kingside.
11 Ëb3
W________W
[rhbDW4kD]
[0pDWhp0p]
[WDWDpDWD]
[1W)WDWDW]
[WDWDPDWD]
[)Q)WGPDW]
[WDWDWDP)]
[$WDWIBHR]
W--------W
We finally protect the loose pawn.
11...Ëc7 12 Íb5
Now the g1-knight can go to e2 without blocking the bishop.
12...Ìec6
12...Ìd7 13 Íxd7! secures the extra pawn, and if 13...Íxd7 14 Ìe2 e5 15 c4, Black must
worry about Ìc3 and Ìd5.
13 Ìe2 Ìa5
A critical position in this variation, where White must decide where to place his queen.
14 Ëb4
The idea of this move is simply to reinforce c5 and make Black work to win it back. I pre-
fer it to either 14 Ëa4 or 14 Ëc2.
14...e5
White doesn’t mind 14...Ìbc6 15 Ëa4 Íd7 16 Îd1 a6 17 Íxc6 Íxc6 18 Ëb4, when his
cramping c5-pawn is extra and it intends to remain that way.
15 0-0 Íe6?

19
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

Wang is unable to adapt to the exotic customs of this strange land. Correct is 15...Ìa6
16 Íxa6 bxa6 17 c4! (offering our queen air) 17...Íe6 18 Îfd1 Îab8 19 Ëe1 Ìxc4 20 Íf2
Ìb2 21 Îd6 Îfd8 22 Îxd8+ Ëxd8, as in N.Papenin-F.Finocchiaro, correspondence 2013.
Black has regained his pawn, but I still think White has the advantage after 23 Ëc3, since
the passed c5-pawn is obviously more valuable than Black’s doubled pawn on a6.
W________W
[rhWDW4kD]
[0p1WDp0p]
[WDWDbDWD]
[hB)W0WDW]
[W!WDPDWD]
[)W)WGPDW]
[WDWDNDP)]
[$WDWDRIW]
W--------W
Exercise (planning): Anand found a startling idea here which pushed his
position from simply better to strategically won. What would you play as White?

Answer: Piece sacrifice.

16 Ìd4!!
Some ideas come into the world with a violent birth; in this case White’s knight chooses
a martyr’s death. As it turns out, White’s centre isn’t quite as dormant as we originally be-
lieved. Anand’s move is a clear improvement over the routine 16 Îfd1 from M.Cebalo-
S.Marinkovic, European Championship, Budva 2009.
16...exd4
Black agrees to the deal, not by inclination but by compulsion. Now the white struc-
ture’s former inelasticity expands into absolute flexibility and the central pawns turn into
a conglomeration of bullies, looking to make life miserable for their enemies.
White also holds a clear advantage if the piece is declined; for example, 16...Íd7 17 Ìf5
Ìbc6 (or 17...Íxf5 18 exf5 Ìbc6 19 Ëe4 and White dominates) 18 Ëa4 a6 19 Íd3! and
Black has no useful discovered attack on White’s queen, since 19...Ìd4? is met by 20 Ìe7+
Êh8 21 Ìd5 Ëd8 22 Ëb4 Ìdc6 23 Ëb2 with a strategically won game.
17 cxd4
These creatures hunt in a pack. Just look at the transformation of those central pawns.
White’s profit margin for the piece:
1. Two powerful, central pawns, which threaten to napalm their way through Black’s
position.

20
 The Nimzo-Indian Defence

2. By the structural alteration, White’s bishops just got 100% more potent.
3. Worse still, Black has no available counterplay and can only wait.
Conclusion: Black is fighting for his life, despite the extra piece.
17...Ìbc6 18 Ëc3
Threatening swift dismemberment with d4-d5.
18...Ìe7
Black’s defenders try to give the white pawns a wide berth.
19 Îfd1 Îad8 20 Íf2!
W________W
[WDW4W4kD]
[0p1Whp0p]
[WDWDbDWD]
[hB)WDWDW]
[WDW)PDWD]
[)W!WDPDW]
[WDWDWGP)]
[$WDRDWIW]
W--------W
Transferring to the more effective h2-b8 diagonal.
20...a6
Weakening b6 only makes matters worse. Black may have been better off with 20...b6,
although 21 a4 Íd7 22 Íg3 Ëc8 23 Îac1 Íc6 24 Ëb4 applies intense pressure.
21 Íg3 Ëc8 22 Íf1
It tugs at my heart strings when I see some poor soul dressed as a hot dog, twirling a
sign in front of a burger joint. Black’s a5-knight, which just ran out of safe havens, reminds
us of that forlorn guy with the sign, who life has left behind.
22...b6
Or 22...Ìac6 23 Íd6, threatening d4-d5, and Black’s game collapses no matter how he
responds.
23 Îab1 Ìb3
Returning some of the material fails to ease Black’s pain.
24 Îxb3 Íxb3 25 Ëxb3 bxc5 26 d5!

21
Opening Repertoire: 1 d4 with 2 c4

W________W
[WDq4W4kD]
[DWDWhp0p]
[pDWDWDWD]
[DW0PDWDW]
[WDWDPDWD]
[)QDWDPGW]
[WDWDWDP)]
[DWDRDBIW]
W--------W
Black is the exchange up for a pawn, yet his position is hopeless since White’s central
pawns are monsters and Black’s a6- and c5-pawns are weaklings, waiting to be picked off.
26...Ìg6 27 Ëb6
There goes a6.
27...f5 28 Íxa6 Ëd7 29 Íb5 Ëf7 30 exf5
There was nothing wrong with the immediate 30 Ëxc5 either.
30...Ëxf5 31 Ëxc5
Now White has three pawns for the exchange, not to mention a completely dominating
position.
31...Îc8 32 Ëd4 Îfd8 33 a4 1-0
W________W
[WDr4WDkD]
[DWDWDW0p]
[WDWDWDnD]
[DBDPDqDW]
[PDW!WDWD]
[DWDWDPGW]
[WDWDWDP)]
[DWDRDWIW]
W--------W
Black will be trampled by White’s passed pawns. Wang Hao didn’t want to stick around
to witness the end.

22