Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
49 views

Error-Detection and - Correction Techniques

This document discusses error detection and correction techniques used in computer networks. It begins by introducing the basic scenario where data transmitted from a sending node to a receiving node may experience bit errors. It then examines three techniques in detail: parity checks, checksumming methods, and cyclic redundancy checks (CRCs). Parity checks involve adding an extra parity bit to detect errors, while checksumming and CRCs involve performing calculations on the data and transmitting the results to detect errors at the receiving end. CRC is widely used today and works by dividing the transmitted data by a pre-agreed pattern and checking if the remainder is zero.

Uploaded by

جلال عواد كاظم جودة
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
49 views

Error-Detection and - Correction Techniques

This document discusses error detection and correction techniques used in computer networks. It begins by introducing the basic scenario where data transmitted from a sending node to a receiving node may experience bit errors. It then examines three techniques in detail: parity checks, checksumming methods, and cyclic redundancy checks (CRCs). Parity checks involve adding an extra parity bit to detect errors, while checksumming and CRCs involve performing calculations on the data and transmitting the results to detect errors at the receiving end. CRC is widely used today and works by dividing the transmitted data by a pre-agreed pattern and checking if the remainder is zero.

Uploaded by

جلال عواد كاظم جودة
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
AL-MUSTAQBAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
COMPUTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

Error-Detection and -Correction Techniques

SUPERVISION BY: STUDENT NAME:

DR: Layth Abudlkareem Hassnawi Jalal Awad Kadhem

Eng: Sundos Firas Jabbar


1. Introduction
In this section we will examine a few of the simplest techniques that can be used to detect
and, in some cases, correct such bit errors. Figure 1 illustrates the setting for our study. At
the sending node, data, D, to be protected against bit errors is augmented with error-
detection and correction bits (EDC). Typically, the data to be protected includes not only
the datagram passed down from the network layer for transmission across the link, but also
link-level addressing information, sequence numbers, and other fields in the link frame
header. Both D and EDC are sent to the receiving node in a link-level frame. At the
receiving node, a sequence of bits, D′ and EDC′ is received. Note that D′ and EDC′ may
differ from the original D and EDC as a result of in-transit bit flips. The receiver’s
challenge is to determine whether or not D′ is the same as the original D, given that it has
only received D′ and EDC′. The exact wording of the receiver’s decision in Figure 1 (we
ask whether an error is detected, not whether an error has occurred!) is important. Error-
detection and -correction techniques allow the receiver to sometimes, but not always, detect
that bit errors have occurred. Even with the use of error-detection bits there still may be
undetected bit errors; that is, the receiver may be unaware that the received information
contains bit errors.

Figure 1: Error-detection and -correction scenario.

Let’s now examine three techniques for detecting errors in the transmitted data: parity
checks (to illustrate the basic ideas behind error detection and correction), checksumming
methods (which are more typically used in the transport layer), and cyclic redundancy
checks (which are more typically used in the link layer in an adapter).
1.1 Parity Checks
Perhaps the simplest form of error detection is the use of a single parity bit. Suppose that
the information to be sent, D in Figure 2, has d bits. In an even parity scheme, the sender
simply includes one additional bit and chooses its value such that the total number of 1s in
the d + 1 bits (the original information plus a parity bit) is even. For odd parity schemes,
the parity bit value is chosen such that there is an odd number of 1s. Figure 2 illustrates an
even parity scheme, with the single parity bit being stored in a separate field.
Receiver operation is also simple with a single parity bit. The receiver need only count the
number of 1s in the received d + 1 bits. If an odd number of 1-valued bits are found with an
even parity scheme, the receiver knows that at least one bit error has occurred. More
precisely, it knows that some odd number of bit errors have occurred. But what happens if
an even number of bit errors occur? You should convince yourself that this would result in
an undetected error.

Figure 2: One-bit even parity.

Let’s consider a simple generalization of one-bit parity that will provide us with insight into
error-correction techniques. Figure 3 shows a two-dimensional generalization of the single-
bit parity scheme. Here, the d bits in D are divided into i rows and j columns. A parity
value is computed for each row and for each column. The resulting i + j + 1 parity bits
comprise the link-layer frame’s error-detection bits.
Suppose now that a single bit error occurs in the original d bits of information. With this
two-dimensional parity scheme, the parity of both the column and the row containing the
flipped bit will be in error. The receiver can thus not only detect the fact that a single bit
error has occurred, but can use the column and row indices of the column and row with
parity errors to actually identify the bit that was corrupted and correct that error! Figure 3
shows an example in which the 1-valued bit in position (2,2) is corrupted and switched to a
0—an error that is both detectable and correctable at the receiver. Although our discussion
has focused on the original d bits of information, a single error in the parity bits themselves
is also detectable and correctable.
Figure 3: Two-dimensional even parity

1.2 Checksumming Methods


In checksum error detection scheme, the data is divided into k segments each of m bits. In
the sender’s end the segments are added using 1’s complement arithmetic to get the sum.
The sum is complemented to get the checksum. The checksum segment is sent along with
the data segments as shown in the following example. At the receiver’s end, all received
segments are added using 1’s complement arithmetic to get the sum. If the result is ones,
the received data is accepted; otherwise discarded.
Suppose that you have the following data: (10110011101010110101101011010101) and
k=4, m=8. To calculate the checksum (in the sender side) we do the following calculation:
Sender:

10110011
10101011
01011110
1
01011111
01011010
10111001
11010101
10001110
1
Sum:10001111
Checksum:01110000
Receiver:
10110011
10101011
01011110
1
01011111
01011010
10111001
11010101
10001110
1
10001111
01110000
Sum:11111111
No error

1.3 Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC)


An error-detection technique used widely in today’s computer networks is based on cyclic
redundancy check (CRC) codes. CRC codes operate as follows. Consider the d-bit piece
of data, D, that the sending node wants to send to the receiving node. The sender and
receiver must first agree on an r + 1 bit pattern, known as a generator, which we will
denote as G.
We will require that the most significant (leftmost) bit of G be a 1. The key idea behind
CRC is that for a given piece of data, D, the sender will choose r additional bits, R, and
append them to D such that the resulting d + r bit pattern (interpreted as a binary number) is
exactly divisible by G (i.e., has no remainder) using modulo-2 arithmetic. The process of
error checking with CRCs is thus simple: The receiver divides the d + r received bits by G.
If the remainder is nonzero, the receiver knows that an error has occurred; otherwise the
data is accepted as being correct.
Figure 4 illustrates this calculation for the case of D = 101110, d = 6, G = 1001, and r = 3.
The 9 bits transmitted in this case are 101 110 011.
1.4 REFERENCES

ABRAMSON, N. "The ALOHA system-- another alternative for computer commu- nications," in
Proc. 1970 Fall Jt Com- puter Conf, AFIPS Press, Arlington, Va., pp 281-285.

ABRAMSON, N "The ALOHA system," DAYS76 in Computer-communwat~on networks, N.


Abrarnson and F. Kuo (Eds.), Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973.

BARAN, P. "On dmtributed communica- tion networks," IEEE Trans. Commun. Syst. CS-12
(March 1964), 1-9.

You might also like