Safed Guidelines June 2020.

Guidelines
on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts
LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020

I Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
The Safety Assessment Federation - SAFed - represents

the interests of companies engaged in independent
inspection and safety assessment of engineering and
manufacturing plant, systems and machinery.
© 2020 SAFETY ASSESSMENT FEDERATION
WAIVER
Copyright is waived by SAFed in respect of Annex A - Certificate and Reports.
The purpose of this waiver is to enable the Competent Person to call for
additional site specific tests and to enable those responsible for carrying out
the tests as appropriate to adapt the reports accordingly.
The certificate and reports in Annex 5 are available electronically at either

www.leia.co.uk or www.safed.co.uk websites.
All rights reserved. Except for normal review purposes, no part of this publication may be
reproduced, utilised, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information,
storage or retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher.
II Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
ISSUE STATUS AND REVISIONS

Issue Date Pages
02 February 2006 New document
03 February 2009 II 6.7
04 June 2020 New document
04.1 June 2020 Error on page 5.25,

Line 5, 4.11 corrected to 4.12
III Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
FOREWORD
These revised Guidelines have been prepared by the Safety Assessment
Federation in consultation with other interested parties within the lift industry.
This publication should not be regarded as an authoritative interpretation
of the law; however, if the guidance provided is followed, it will normally be
regarded as sufficient to comply with health and safety law in respect of
supplementary testing in support of thorough examinations.
The Health and Safety Executive believes that the contents of this publication
represent good practice in the lift industry.
IV Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
FOREWORD III
Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1

1.1 Terms 1.1
1.1.1 Competent Person 1.1
1.1.2 Thorough examination 1.2
1.1.3 Functional test 1.2
1.1.4 Supplementary tests 1.3
1.2 Purpose of supplementary tests 1.3
1.3 Aim of guidance on supplementary tests 1.3
1.4 Status of guidance 1.4
1.5 Relationship between the thorough examination and
‘maintenance requirements and the development of
new technology’ 1.4
Section 2 LEGAL COMMENTARY 2.1

2.1 Introduction 2.1
2.2 The law outlined 2.1
2.2.1 Health & Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSWA) 2.1
2.2.2 Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations
1999 (MHSWR) 2.1
2.2.3 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations
1992 (WPR) 2.1
2.2.4 The Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations
1998 (PUWER) 2.2
2.2.5 The Lifting Operations & Lifting Equipment Regulations
1998 (LOLER) 2.2
2.3 Duties on lift owners 2.3
2.3.1 HSWA particular requirements 2.3
2.3.2 Lift owners responsibilities under HSWA s4 2.3
2.3.3 PUWER Regulation 5: Requirements for lift maintenance 2.3
2.3.4 Lift owners responsibilities for keeping records of
supplementary tests carried out 2.3
2.4 Duties of Competent Persons 2.4
2.4.1 Thorough examinations 2.4
V Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
Page
2.4.2 Report of thorough examination 2.4

2.4.3 Safety at work 2.4
2.4.3.1 Employers’ duties HSWA s2 2.4
2.4.3.2 Employers’ duties HSWA s3 2.5
2.4.3.3 Self Employed persons’ duties HSWA s3 2.5
2.4.3.4 Duties of persons concerned with premises
HSWA s4 2.5
2.4.3.5 Employees’ duties HSWA s7 2.5
2.4.4 Persons working in another employer’s undertaking 2.5
Section 3 PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 3.1

3.1 Scope 3.1
3.2 Types of installation 3.1
3.3 Process of assessment 3.2
3.4 Programmable electronic system in safety related
applications for lifts (PESSRAL) 3.2
Section 4 SUPPLEMENTARY TESTS 4.1

4.1 Earth continuity 4.1
4.2 Electric safety devices 4.2
4.3 Terminal speed reduction systems 4.3
4.4 Landing door interlocks 4.3
4.5 Lift machine 4.4
4.5.1 Investigatory test (type ‘A’) 4.5
4.5.2 Comprehensive test (type ‘B’) 4.5
4.6 Safety gear system (governor, safety gear,
suspension failure device) 4.6
4.6.1 Overspeed governors 4.6
4.6.2 Governor operated safety gear instantaneous type 4.7
4.6.3 Governor operated safety gear progressive type 4.8
4.6.4 Safety gear operated by other means 4.9
4.7 Devices to prevent overspeed of the ascending lift car 4.9
4.8 Unintended Carrier Movement Protection (UCMP) 4.10
4.9 Energy dissipation buffers 4.11
VI Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
Page
4.10 Suspension system 4.11

4.11 Car overload detection warning devices 4.12
4.12 Hydraulic system 4.12
4.12.1 Hydraulic cylinders in boreholes or similar locations 4.13
4.12.2 Hydraulic rupture/restrictor valves 4.13
4.13 Anti-creep devices 4.14
4.13.1 Electrical anti-creep device 4.14
4.13.2 Mechanical anti-creep device (Pawl or clamping device) 4.14
4.14 Low pressure detection devices (Switch or valve) 4.14
4.15 Traction, brake and levelling 4.15
4.16 Car/Counterweight balance 4.16
4.17 Automatic power operated doors 4.17
4.18 Other supplementary tests 4.17
Section 5 ANNEX A - COVERING CERTIFICATE AND REPORT(S) OF

SUPPLEMENTARY TEST(S) 5.1
Annex A Report of examination and test(s) - Principle 5.1
Covering Certificate of examination and test(s) 5.1
Reports of supplementary test(s) 5.1
Annex A.1 Earth continuity 5.2
Annex A.2 Electric safety devices 5.3
Annex A.3 Terminal speed reduction systems 5.4
Annex A.4 Landing door interlocks 5.5
Annex A.5 Lift Machine - Investigatory test (TYPE A) 5.6
Continuation sheet 5.7
Annex A.6 Lift Machine - Comprehensive test (TYPE B) 5.8
Continuation sheet - 1/- 2 5.9/5.10
Annex A.7 Overspeed governors 5.11
Continuation sheet 5.12/5.13
Annex A.8 Governor operated safety gear instantaneous type 5.14/5.15
Annex A.9 Governor operated safety gear progressive type 5.17
VII Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
Page
Annex A.10 Safety gear operated by other means 5.19

Annex A.11 Devices to prevent overspeed of the ascending lift car 5.21/5.22
Annex A.12 Unintended car movement protection 5.23
Annex A.13 Energy dissipation buffers 5.24
Annex A.14 Suspension system 5.25
Annex A.15 Car overload detection warning devices 5.26
Annex A.16 Hydraulic system 5.27
Annex A.17 Hydraulic cylinders in boreholes or similar locations 5.28
Annex A.18 Hydraulic rupture/restrictor valves 5.29
Annex A.19 Electrical anti-creep device 5.30
Annex A.20 Mechanical anti-creep device
(Pawl or clamping device) 5.31
Annex A.21 Low pressure detection devices (Switch or valve) 5.32
Annex A.22 Traction, brake and levelling 5.33/5.34
Annex A.23 Car/counterweight balance 5.35
Annex A.24 Automatic power operated doors 5.36
Annex A.25 Other supplementary tests 5.37
Section 6 ANNEX B (INFORMATIVE) - TECHNICAL INFORMATION 6.1

Annex B (Informative) - Technical information 6.1
B.1 Electrical safety devices 6.1
B.2 Guide to reduced stroke buffering 6.2
Table 1 - Length of buffer stroke 6.2
B.3 Machine system components 6.2
B.3.1 Shafts and bearings 6.2
B.3.2 Roller, ball and needle bearings 6.3
B.3.3 Traction sheaves, bearings and pulleys 6.3
B.4 Developments in British Standards of the requirements
for safety gear tests 6.4
Table 2 - Developments in British Standards of the
requirements for safety gear tests 6.4
VIII Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
Page
B.5 Suspension system data 6.5

B.5.1 Suspension ropes 6.5
B.5.1.1 Broken wires 6.6
Table 3 - Number of visible broken wires - Single layer ropes
with fibre cores operating in cast iron or steel sheaves 6.6
B.5.1.2 Wear and age 6.7
B.5.1.2.1 Diametric reduction 6.7
B.5.1.2.2 Rope life 6.7
B.5.1.2.3 Unusual features 6.8
B.5.2 Lubrication 6.8
B.5.3 Suspension rope terminations 6.8
B.6 Suspension chains 6.9
B.6.1 Wear and age 6.9
B.6.1.1 Round link chains 6.9
B.6.1.2 Plate link chains 6.9
B.6.1.3 Sprocket or chain wheels 6.9
B.6.1.4 Identification and measurements of most
worn chain section 6.10
B.6.2 Replacement 6.10
B.6.3 Lubrication 6.10
B.7 Hydraulic systems 6.10
B.8 History of British Standards requirements for pressure
testing of hydraulic lift systems 6.11
Table 4 - History of British Standards requirements for
pressure testing of hydraulic lift systems 6.11
B.9 Non-destructive testing 6.12
Section 7 ANNEX C - REVIEW COMMITTEE 7.1
Section 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY 8.1

Section 1
Introduction

SECTION 1 Page 1.1 Guidelines on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020
INTRODUCTION
These guidelines apply to supplementary testing in support of thorough
examination carried out on in-service lifts according to regulation 9(3)(a) of the
Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations.
They do not apply to supplementary testing in support of thorough

examination according to regulation 9(1), 9(2) or 9(3)(b) although they might
be considered.
The revised 2006 Guidelines for the supplementary tests of in-service lifts
were formulated by a Review Committee comprising owners, users, lift
manufacturers, lift maintenance companies, inspection bodies, lift consultants,
enforcement authorities and other professional bodies, chaired by the Health
and Safety Executive. At that point they superseded the original document
‘Lifts Guidelines (LG 1): Guidelines on the thorough examination and testing of
lifts, Volumes 1 and 2’, published by SAFed in December 1998, which was
withdrawn. The original 1998 Guidelines in turn replaced the earlier HSE PM7
“Lifts” which were withdrawn.
Please be aware, that the revised document from 2006 has now been updated
several times, refer to SAFed website for most up to date version.
www.safeduk.co.uk
A list of organisations represented on the Review Committee can be found at

Annex C.
1.1Terms
For the purpose of these Guidelines the following terms apply.
1.1.1 Competent Person

A Competent Person is someone who…‘has such appropriate practical
and theoretical knowledge and experience of the lifting equipment to
be thoroughly examined as will enable them to detect defects or
weaknesses and to assess their importance in relation to the safety and
continued use of the lifting equipment’.1
1 ACOP paragraph 296 - HSE L113(2014): Safe Use of Lifting Equipment - Lifting Operations
and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 - ACOP and Guidance
2 Guidance paragraph 297 - HSE L113(2014): Safe Use of Lifting Equipment - Lifting
Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 - ACOP and Guidance
3 INDG339(rev 1): Thorough examination and testing of lifts - Simple guidance for lift owners
- Selecting a competent person
Further HSE guidance states:

‘The Competent Person must be sufficiently independent and impartial
to allow objective decisions to be made’.2
Further HSE simple guidance for lift owners states:

‘For this reason, it is not advisable for the same person who performs
routine maintenance to carry out the thorough examination, as they are
then responsible for assessing their own work’.3
1.1.2 Thorough examination

Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, Regulation 2(1)
Interpretation:
‘thorough examination’ in relation to a thorough examination under
paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of regulation 9 -
(a) means a thorough examination by a Competent Person;

(b) where it is appropriate to carry out testing for the purpose
described in the paragraph, includes such testing by a
Competent Person as is appropriate for the purpose,
and ‘thoroughly examined’ shall be construed accordingly’.4
Note: Regulation 9(3)(a) applies to the periodic thorough examination

of in-service lifts and is relevant to these Guidelines.
Further HSE guidance states:

‘A thorough examination is a systematic and detailed examination of
the lift and all its associated equipment by a Competent Person. Its aim
is to detect any defects which are, or might become, dangerous, and
for the Competent Person to report them to the dutyholder and, if
appropriate, the enforcing authority (the Health and Safety Executive or
Local Authority) so that appropriate remedial action can be taken’.5
1.1.3 Functional test

Normally undertaken by the Competent Person at the time of the thorough
examination, to prove that the device is in efficient working order.
4 Regulation 2 (1) HSE L113(2014): Safe Use of Lifting Equipment - Lifting Operations and
Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 - ACOP and Guidance
5 INDG 339rev1: Thorough examination and testing of lifts - Simple guidance for lift owners -
What is a thorough examination
6 Guidance paragraph 310/312 - HSE L113(2014): Safe Use of Lifting Equipment - Lifting
Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 - ACOP and Guidance
1.1.4 Supplementary tests

Appropriate tests and/or examinations called for by the Competent
Person where concerns regarding the condition of equipment arise from
the thorough examination.
'The Competent Person should decide whether or not a load test is

necessary, and the nature of the test, as part of the thorough
examination’.
and
‘Other testing may be carried out as part of the thorough examination
where the Competent Person considers they are required to properly
assess the safety of the equipment, eg non-destructive tests’.6
1.2 Purpose of supplementary tests

The purpose of the supplementary tests is to support the thorough
examination in order to establish the equipment’s suitability for continued
safe use. Such supplementary tests, which should be called for by the
Competent Person, will need to be undertaken and documented in order to
enable the subsequent thorough examination to be completed. Failure to
complete the supplementary tests may preclude the completion of the
subsequent thorough examination, requiring the lift to be taken out of
service and not used. In some circumstances the Competent Person may
require to witness the ‘supplementary tests’.
The supplementary tests themselves are not part of a servicing or

maintenance regime; they are solely to support the thorough examination.
Where concerns regarding the condition of the equipment arise from a
thorough examination it is ultimately the decision of the Competent Person
carrying out that thorough examination as to what supplementary tests are
required and when.
1.3 Aim of guidance on supplementary tests

The Guidelines are primarily intended for Competent Persons undertaking
thorough examinations and represent a consensus of practical experience.
The overall aim of these Guidelines is to clarify the scope and reasons for
supplementary tests, called for by the Competent Person in support of the
thorough examination, and to achieve consistency of reporting the test
results. Where such supplementary tests are called for they should be based
on an assessment of the condition of the equipment at the time of the
thorough examination.
1.4 Status of guidance

This document has no legal status. Where called for in support of the
thorough examination, compliance with these Guidelines would normally
satisfy the requirements of The Provision and Use of Work Equipment
Regulations 1998 (PUWER) and The Lifting Operations and Lifting
Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER). Should Competent Persons not
follow these guidelines they should take other action to ensure compliance
with Health and Safety law. A legal commentary, including the legal
requirements for the maintenance of lifts, is contained in Chapter 2.
1.5 Relationship between the thorough examination and

‘maintenance requirements and the development of
new technology’
As noted in paragraph 1.2 the contents of these Guidelines should not be
confused with servicing and maintenance and neither replaces any aspect
of the maintenance requirements for lifts nor does it preclude the
introduction and use of new technologies or test techniques. The suitability
of any new supplementary test techniques supporting the thorough
examination proposed either by the manufacturer or his agent should be
agreed by the Competent Person, the owner and such relevant parties prior
to their application.
Information on how to perform testing of new technologies or components

may be found in the original equipment manufacturer’s (OEM) manual, this
may support the Competent Person during he through examination (for
example instructions on how to perform simple over-travel limit switch
check on a PESSRAL device, rather than calling for a supplementary test).
Section 2
Legal Commentary

LEGAL COMMENTARY
2.1 Introduction
The law places duties on persons concerned with lifts, both those who
provide or make available lifts for use and those involved with work on
lifts. This Chapter outlines those legal duties and points the reader towards
further relevant guidance material.
2.2 The law outlined

Legislation relating to the use of lifts at work includes the:
• Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974
• Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999/3242
• Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992/3004
• Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998/2306
• Lifting Operations & Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998/2307
2.2.1 Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA)

HSWA places a duty on employers to ensure the health and safety of
employees and others who may be affected by their work activities.
Similar duties are placed on the self-employed and persons in control of
premises. Employees, managers and directors also have responsibilities.
The HSWA also places a duty on lift owners and other duty holders,
where their work activity involves lifts being used by the general public.
2.2.2 Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999

(MHSWR)
Under MHSWR, employers and self-employed people are required to
assess risks to health and safety from their undertaking. This includes
risks from the use, repair and examination of lifts in their building,
including the operation of the lift machinery. The risk assessment
should identify what measures are needed to comply with health and
safety requirements. The duty holder should then put in place the
organisation and arrangements to ensure that those measures are
properly implemented.
2.2.3 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

(WPR)
WPR places duties on employers to ensure, as far as is reasonably
practicable, that their work places are safe and without risks to health.
The WPR cover matters such as ventilation, temperature, lighting,
electromagnetic radiation and cleanliness of the workplace as well as
certain basic welfare provisions.
2.2.4 The Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998

(PUWER)
PUWER is concerned with such matters as safeguarding of dangerous
parts of machinery, provision of appropriate controls and lighting of
work equipment.
PUWER places duties on any person who has control to any extent of:
• work equipment;
• a person at work who uses, supervises or manages the use of work
equipment; or
• the way in which work equipment is used at work.
PUWER applies to employers in respect of work equipment provided

for, or used by, their employees, self-employed persons in respect of
work equipment they use and other persons, e.g. visitors. Work
equipment covers lifts used at work.
PUWER requires that every employer shall ensure that work equipment
is maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good
repair. Also that every employer shall ensure that where any machinery
has a maintenance log, the log is kept up to date. NOTE: It is clear that
maintenance and thorough examination are separate activities.
2.2.5 The Lifting Operations & Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998

(LOLER)
LOLER deals with the specific risks arising from the use of work
equipment to lift loads. It builds upon PUWER and applies to the same
groups of people. LOLER introduces particular requirements for lifting
equipment which is used to lift people, and a requirement for the
periodic thorough examination of lifts.
Persons in control of non-domestic premises who provide a lift or lifts

which are used by other people at work are required to comply with
their duties under LOLER.
‘LOLER only applies to work activities. It does not apply, for example, to
people who provide lifting equipment principally for use by members of
the public such as lifts provided for use by the public in a shopping centre.
In such circumstances owners will have to satisfy the requirements of the
HSWA, principally sections 3 and 4, but if they use the requirements of
LOLER as a guide they will probably satisfy these legal duties’.7
7 Guidance paragraph 43 - HSE L113(2014): Safe Use of Lifting Equipment - Lifting Operations
and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 - ACOP and Guidance
Although the example in the ACOP above is of a lift in a shopping

centre, it might be that such lifts are routinely used by people at work.
Consequently, it is usual practice for such lifts to be subject to regular
thorough examination as described in LOLER.
2.3 Duties on lift owners
2.3.1 HSWA particular requirements

Owners and managers of buildings in which lifts are installed have duties
under HSWA s4. This section relates to ‘persons who have, to any extent,
control of non-domestic premises used by persons who are not their
employees, as a place of work or as a place where they may use plant’.
Note: ‘Plant’ includes equipment.
2.3.2 Lift owners responsibilities under HSWA s4

HSWA s4 deals with general duties of controllers of premises. In buildings
in which there are lifts, it is generally clear who has responsibility for
providing the lift and for ensuring its continuing safe use. These may be
different people, for example the person who is ‘in control’ of the lift may
be the owner of the premises in which the lift is installed, a facilities
manager or the occupier of those premises. The individuals or companies
who have ‘control’ under s4 are described in these Guidelines as the ‘lift
owner’ or ‘duty holder’. Lift owners are expected to take reasonably
practicable measures to ensure that the premises, as well as all means of
access, egress, working environment and any plant or substances provided
for use there, are safe and without risk to health.
2.3.3 PUWER Regulation 5: Requirements for lift maintenance

PUWER Regulation 5 requires that work equipment is maintained in an
efficient state, in efficient working order and in good repair. Where any
machinery has a maintenance log, this should be kept up-to-date. There
should be regular maintenance and a simple record should be kept that
such maintenance has been carried out.
2.3.4 Lift owners responsibilities for keeping records of reports and

supplementary tests carried out
A thorough examination may include some testing, if the Competent
Person considers it to be necessary. The Competent Person should
determine what tests are required. Where supplementary tests have
been called for in support of the thorough examination, it is the lift
owner’s responsibility to ensure that such supplementary tests are
undertaken by those competent to carry out and certify such tests.
The records of supplementary tests, as part of the report of thorough

examination, must be retained by the lift owner as required by LOLER
Regulation 10. In all cases the reports of thorough examination and
any records of supplementary tests should be made available to the
Competent Person and a copy sent to the lift maintenance company, by
the lift owner.
2.4 Duties of Competent Persons
2.4.1 Thorough examinations

LOLER Regulation 9 requires that thorough examinations are
undertaken by a Competent Person. It is essential that the Competent
Person is sufficiently independent and impartial to allow objective
decisions to be made. The Competent Person is responsible for notifying
the lift owner immediately if there is any dangerous, or potentially
dangerous, defect. In certain cases it may also be necessary to send a
copy of the report to the relevant enforcing authority (Local Authority or
Health and Safety Executive).
The Competent Person undertaking the thorough examination should

identify any requirement for supplementary tests to be carried out in order
to complete a thorough examination or prior to a subsequent thorough
examination. Should the Competent Person wish to witness the
supplementary tests then he should inform the lift owner of this
requirement at the time of the thorough examination.
2.4.2 Report of thorough examination

In all cases following a thorough examination, the Competent Person
should make a report of thorough examination in writing containing the
information specified in LOLER Schedule 1. This report should be sent to
the lift owner or their chosen representative commissioning the thorough
examination. Where supplementary tests have been called for in support of
the thorough examination, the type and extent of the test(s) as determined
by the process of assessment and the reason for the request should be
clearly documented on the report. Requests for supplementary tests should
only be submitted by the Competent Person carrying out the thorough
examination and normally submitted on the report to the lift owner.
2.4.3 Safety at work
2.4.3.1 Employers’ duties HSWA s2

The law requires thorough examinations and any supplementary tests to
be carried out in a safe manner. Employers of a Competent Person and
of those who carry out supplementary tests have duties under HSWA s2
to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, their safety at work. This
duty extends to the provision and maintenance of safe work equipment,
providing such information, instruction, training and supervision as is

necessary to ensure safety.
Employers should ensure safe working arrangements for solitary

workers. Particular hazards should be identified by carrying out the risk
assessment and planning of the work.
Note: Some of the issues are outlined in the HSE guidance booklet
‘Working Alone – Health and safety guidance on the risks of lone
working’ INDG73(rev3).
2.4.3.2 Employers’ duties HSWA s3

Employers also have duties under HSWA s3 to conduct their
undertaking in such a way as to ensure, so far as is reasonably
practicable, that persons not in their employment who might be
affected, are not exposed to risks to their health and safety.
2.4.3.3 Self Employed persons’ duties HSWA s3

Self-employed persons have the same duties as employers (see 2.4.3.2
above) under HSWA s3 to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable,
that their work is conducted in such a way that does not expose other
persons or themselves to risks.
2.4.3.4 Duties of persons concerned with premises HSWA s4

Persons who have to any extent control of premises should, so far as is
reasonably practicable, ensure that such premises, including access to
and egress from, or of any plant or substance in the premises are safe
and without risk to health. These responsibilities are held by persons
who have control of the premises in connection with a trade, business
or undertaking.
2.4.3.5 Employees’ duties HSWA s7

Employees have general duties under HSWA s7 to take reasonable care
for the health and safety of themselves and of other persons who may
be affected by their acts or omissions at work; and to co-operate with
their employer in the fulfilment of their duties.
2.4.4 Persons working in another employer’s undertaking

Under MHSWR Regulation 12 it is the responsibility of an employer or
self-employed person to provide the employer of any employees from an
outside undertaking with information on any health and safety risks arising,
and on measures taken to comply with the relevant legislation. An example
would be a third party Competent Person witnessing a supplementary test
carried out by a third party testing organisation at the undertaking where
the lift is located. The employer of the undertaking is responsible for
providing information to the employer of the third parties.
Section 3
Practical Considerations

PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
3.1 Scope
The purpose of these Guidelines is to inform Competent Persons
undertaking thorough examinations of examples of supplementary tests
which they could call for as part of their thorough examinations.
These Guidelines do not define the scope of a thorough examination which

is the responsibility of the Competent Person undertaking the thorough
examination. The supplementary tests alone do not constitute the scope of
a thorough examination.
An assessment by a Competent Person, based on reasoned engineering

judgement together with the potential hazards and risks, should establish
the type and extent of such supplementary tests. A conclusion of such an
assessment could be that such supplementary tests are not required.
However, whilst this is effective for the majority of supplementary tests,

there are some tests, for which the condition and continued safety could be
more difficult to establish during a thorough examination. In such cases, it
is for the Competent Person, using an engineering judgement, to decide
whether a supplementary test should be called for using the periodicities
recommended within these guidelines.
This does not prevent lift maintenance companies from recommending a

supplementary test where their maintenance inspection have identified
potential defects, which need further investigation under the supplementary
test regime. Where this occurs, the results of any such tests should be
documented using the documentation found in Annex A, a copy of this
should be kept with the lift and advised to the Competent Person accordingly,
so that it can be considered during the next Thorough Examination.
The Guidelines also inform those third party organisations competent to

undertake such supplementary tests, when called for by the Competent Person
or others following a thorough examination or other form of inspection.
3.2 Types of installation

These Guidelines are applicable to the thorough examination and testing of
the following types of lift, irrespective of drive system:
Passenger; Passenger/goods; Goods only; Service; Domestic and

Lifting platform.
In the absence of alternative specific guidance, the general principles may

additionally be applied to other types of lifting equipment.
3.3 Process of assessment

The process of assessment should include consideration of:
• design
• condition
• usage of the lift
• operating environment
• known problems with the particular equipment
• relevant component manufacturers’ recommendations
• integrity of the building and installation
The results of the process of assessment may necessitate variations to the

extent and nature of the supplementary tests described later in this section
of the document and to the frequency with which they are performed.
Where such variations are identified these should be communicated to
the lift owner. The process of assessment leading to the engineering
judgement should be justified and recorded, a notebook is deemed as
being sufficient.
3.4 Programmable electronic system in safety related applications

for lifts (PESSRAL)
These tests might not require specialist training or equipment and so could
be carried out by the Competent Person during the thorough examination
following the instructions in the OEM manual.
Where a functional test of a PESSRAL device cannot be carried out without

proprietary test equipment and specialist training, the Competent Person
should call for evidence to confirm the functionality of the system.
Any testing of these devices should be done by referencing the OEM

manuals for guidance on how these tests should be undertaken.
Section 4
Supplementary Tests

SUPPLEMENTARY TESTS
The following outlines a series of recommended supplementary tests of key
components and areas to be determined by the Competent Person through a
process of assessment.
The results of all supplementary tests and subsequent maintenance and repair
if required should be recorded on the Examination and Test Report(s). These are
contained within Annex A and are to be annotated in the covering Certificate
(Page 5.1).
The Examination and Test Certificate and Report(s) contained at Annex A are
available in electronic format on the SAFed website www.safed.co.uk or the LEIA
website www.leia.co.uk. They are guidance on a format for reporting the results
of supplementary tests and are intended for use by companies and persons
competent to carry out the designated supplementary tests. Such companies or
persons may adjust or otherwise alter these reports for their own use and to
allow for company identity and any special particulars relating to the lift, the test,
the site and the company carrying out the test. However in all cases the reports
must contain the data required to identify the actual lift, the site, the date and
details of the test(s) carried out and the company or person carrying out the
supplementary test(s). Responsibility for and ownership of the Certificate of
Examination and Test(s) and of completed Report(s) lies wholly with the
company or person issuing the Certificate and Report(s) and not with the Safety
Assessment Federation, the Lift & Escalator Industry Association or its agents.
The list of key components specifically mentioned in this chapter is by no

means exhaustive. Whilst every effort has been made to include as many key
components as practicable, Competent Persons should be aware that particular
modern lift designs may include additional key components not featured here.
4.1 Earth continuity

It should be established that adequate earthing of all metal work, such as
the car, landing doorframes, machine, controller and guides is provided.
This is primarily to ensure electrical integrity and prevent electric shocks.
Visual examination will normally be carried out by the Competent Person

during the Thorough Examination to assess the presence and condition of
earth bonding. This is an important check as earth bonding maybe taken off
for maintenance or repair, so correct refitting is essential.
Where it is not possible to verify the earth continuity of the installation

during the thorough examination, consideration should be given by the
Competent Person to calling for a supplementary test.
The fuse protection of the safety circuit should be tested by either a purpose
made device or by measuring the resistance of the circuit and calculating
the short circuit current. The safety circuit should not be checked by
grounding its furthest point. It is recommended that to be consistent with
BS7671 Requirements for Electrical Installations: IET Wiring Regulations
and IET Guidance Note 3, this supplementary test should be called for at 5
yearly intervals unless it can be demonstrated that more frequent tests are
required or that less frequent tests will be adequate to ensure safety .
The earth continuity should not exceed 0.5Ω but check the OEM manual for
any relevant information regarding earth testing methods and acceptable
values. Lower values may be actually needed to ensure adequate protective
device disconnection time and higher values might be acceptable.
It is important that both the building supply and lift circuits are tested,
further guidance can be found in Annex D of BS7255:2012 “Code of
Practice for Safe working on Lifts”.
See Annex A.1 for report format of examination and test.
4.2 Electric safety devices

In order to verify that electrical safety devices are in efficient working order,
a functional test of each of these devices should be undertaken as part of
thorough examination by the Competent Person.
Where the functional test of a safety device cannot be carried out by the
Competent Person where access is difficult or a test may not be possible for
a given reason, then that person should call for a supplementary test to be
made of the specific device(s) at least annually.
Where the Competent Person considers that in addition a supplementary

test is required then this should be clearly identified.
Where test techniques are not known e.g. PESSRAL devices, always refer to
the OEM manual for guidance on how these tests should be undertaken.
See Annex B.1 for a non-exhaustive list of electric safety devices.

4.3 Terminal speed reduction systems

It is common for lifts with a rated speed of 2.5m/s or greater to be provided
with buffers that are not intended to arrest the car or counterweight at such
speeds (reduced stroke buffers). In such circumstances the control system
should have been provided with a terminal speed reduction system to
ensure the car or counterweight cannot impact the buffer at speeds above
that for which they are designed.
It is unlikely that the Competent Person will have the equipment or access
to carry out verification of the terminal speed reduction system, where
these are fitted, with the occasional exception of older mechanical systems.
It is therefore recommended that the supplementary test should be called
for at 5 yearly intervals, unless it can be demonstrated that more frequent
tests are required or that less frequent tests will be adequate to ensure
safety.
Before conducting any supplementary test it should first be determined that

a terminal speed reduction system is applicable and in place.
Before commencing any dynamic test it should be determined that the

control system functions correctly and any limit switches or associated
parts are correctly positioned.

manuals for guidance on how these tests should be undertaken to minimise
any potential wear or damage.
The normal slowing signals for the lift should be made inoperative and the
car driven at rated speed towards the terminal floor. It should be
determined that the lift slows down automatically to a speed not greater
than the buffer design impact speed.
4.4 Landing door interlocks

In order to verify that landing door interlocks (including both lock and
pre-lock contacts on landing locks used with retiring ramps) are in efficient
working order, a functional test of each of these devices should be
undertaken at every thorough examination.
Where the condition of any landing door lock cannot be verified by the
Competent Person, that person should call for a supplementary test of the
device. Any such supplementary test should ensure that the lock prevents
the door from opening when the lift is outside of the unlocking zone. It
should also be ensured that the lift will stop if the lock circuit is opened
outside of the unlocking zone. All parts of the lock should be clean, not
excessively worn, without signs of burning and undamaged in any way.
4.5 Lift machine

The Competent Person would normally as part of the thorough examination
be able to observe the condition of the lift machine. For geared lift
machines, this should include the winding mechanism, gearwheel
backlash, horizontal and lateral shaft thrust, and detection of any hot spots,
oil leaks, noise or excessive vibration.
If due to the design of the lift machine, it is not possible to make a

reasonable judgement as to the critical integrity of the lift machine then the
Competent Person should consider calling for a Type A investigatory test as
detailed in 4.5.1.
If as a result of the thorough examination there is reason to believe there

may be a problem within the lift machine and is not possible to pinpoint
the exact cause then, the Competent Person should consider calling for a
more detailed supplementary test is required, such as a Type B
comprehensive test as detailed in 4.5.2.
In determining the need for and degree of any supplementary test which
may be required, the Competent Person should make an assessment that
takes into account some or all of the following:
a) The age of the components

b) The results of any previous inspection
c) Signs of unusual or excessive vibration
d) Presence of unusual noise
e) Excessive backlash or thrust float
f) Condition of the lubricant (metal particles in the oil)
g) Excessive temperature or hot spots
h) Known problem with the particular type of machine
i) Ratio of the maximum allowable duty to the actual duty rating
where known
j) Accessibility of hidden critical components
k) Evidence of excessive wear with major load path components
l) Condition and security of shaft keys
In any case, after 10 years of use, any of the above parts, which cannot be
properly visually examined without dismantling should be subject to a
Type B comprehensive test. If after taking into account low usage and
condition the Type B comprehensive test can be delayed but should not be
delayed beyond 15 years.
The thorough examination report should indicate which type of supplementary

test is required, type A (investigatory) or type B (comprehensive).
See also Annex B.3 Machine system components.
Note 1: It is considered unlikely that a gearless traction machine would

need to be subject to supplementary tests because of their design and
accessibility of critical components.
Note 2: Some designs of gearbox may require external checking and

measurement of certain key parameters or return to the manufacturer e.g.
measurement of backlash before the gearbox is dismantled.
4.5.1 Investigatory test (type ‘A’)

An investigatory supplementary test can be called for where it is not
possible to make a reasonable assessment of condition at the time of
the thorough examination and where the assessment indicates that a
supplementary test is advisable. This may be the case in certain designs
of machine where critical components such as load nuts, load chains,
anchor pins, worm-wheel teeth and rim bolts cannot be seen.
The machine should be free of excessive or unusual noise, vibration,

excessive temperature or hot spots.
The machine should operate throughout its travel cycle without

excessive thrust float or backlash.
Gear wheel teeth marking should be even and approximately central of

the teeth. The teeth should be free of steps, pitting or ridges (smooth
faced) and oil should appear clean and most importantly, show no sign
of metal particles. Worm wheel rim/bolts should be secure.
Shafts and bearings should not run hot or show signs of vibration or noise.
Load nut wear and chain extension should be within acceptable limits.
See Annex A.5 for report format of an investigatory test (type A).
4.5.2 Comprehensive test (type ‘B’)

Where a Thorough Examination or an investigatory test indicates there
is serious cause for concern over the condition of a critical load path
item, a comprehensive test of the parts should be undertaken.
Such a supplementary test should include the measurement and

recording of important dimensions such as the wear, extension, thrust
float, backlash and bearing clearances. Detailed inspection should be
made of worm and wheel for wear, signs of excessive heating, cracking,
pitting etc.
Suitable non-destructive testing or examination of areas subject to high

stress loading (e.g. shouldered shafts and keyways) and alignment checks
(e.g. out-rigger bearing), should also be considered if deemed necessary.
Non-destructive testing techniques and oil analysis may be used to

supplement the examination process.
The findings should be set out in a detailed report as indicated in

Annex A.6.
Comprehensive tests (type B) are only to be called for where there is

clear evidence that something serious is wrong or about to occur.
See Annex A.6 for report format of a comprehensive test (type B).
4.6 Safety gear system (governor, safety gear, suspension

failure device)
Where no documented evidence exists verifying the satisfactory operation
of the system, consideration should be given by the Competent Person to
calling for such a supplementary test. Thereafter, consideration should be
given to calling for such a supplementary test of the safety gear
(car/counterweight), together with any overspeed governor and torpedo
release device (if fitted).
Supplementary testing should be carried out on every occasion that a

change is made e.g. change of governor rope to the safety gear system.
Appropriate supplementary tests are described in the following sections.
4.6.1 Overspeed governors

Overspeed governors should be subject to supplementary testing to
ensure correct electrical and mechanical operation at the appropriate
tripping speeds (including sufficient gripping force on the rope to
activate the safety gear). A tripping speed test with the safety gear
disconnected is not generally considered an onerous test and should be
carried out at 5 yearly intervals.
See Annex B - Table 2 for guidance.

Where a test of safety gear according to 4.6.2 or 4.6.3 is not carried out,
then the operation of the system and adequate pull-through force to
engage the safety gear should be checked by tripping the overspeed
governor with the empty car descending at reduced speed or manually. It
is recommended that this be included as a periodic test at 5 year intervals
unless there is evidence to suggest more frequent testing is required.
Such supplementary testing should be carried out as mentioned above and

on every occasion that an overspeed governor has been subject to any repair.
Where test techniques are not known e.g. electronic overspeed

governors, always refer to the OEM manual for guidance on how these
tests should be undertaken.
4.6.2 Governor operated safety gear instantaneous type

Where documented evidence exists (signed test document) that the
safety gear system met the requirements current at the time of
installation, modification, replacement or refurbishment, a rated speed
empty car test should be conducted for car and any counterweight
safety gear. The objective of the test, is to ensure the correct operation
of the overspeed governor and safety gear system and to ensure fittings
within the car remain secure, ropes do not leave sheaves and filler
weights in counterweight frames do not become displaced.
Where there is no documented evidence of a previous successful test (with

a rated load for car, empty car for counterweight) a test should be performed
to prove the system operates in accordance with the requirements specified
in the standard applicable at the time of installation. When conducting the
test the method should ensure the lift is stopped by the safety gear without
the assistance of the brake or some other device. Any testing of these
devices should be done by referencing the OEM manuals for guidance to
minimise any potential wear or damage. The aim of this test is to check the
correct mounting, correct setting and the soundness of the complete
assembly, comprising car, safety gear, guide rails and their fixing to the
building. The test should also ensure that the safety gear and car frame
are capable of absorbing the loads imposed on them.
A visual check will be carried out by the Competent Person during the
thorough examination and further regular visual checks of the system
should be carried out by the maintenance company but it is
recommended that this be included as a periodic test at 10 year intervals
After any such supplementary test, it should be ascertained that no

deterioration, which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift,
has occurred. If necessary, friction components should be replaced.
4.6.3 Governor operated safety gear progressive type

Where documented evidence exists (signed test document) that the
safety gear system has been tested and met the requirements current at
the time of installation, modification, replacement or refurbishment, a
reduced speed (approximately 1m/s) empty car test should be
conducted for car and any counterweight safety gear. When
conducting the test the method should ensure the lift is stopped by the
safety gear without the assistance of the brake or some other device.
manuals for guidance to minimise any potential wear or damage. The
objective of the test, is to ensure the correct operation of the overspeed
governor and the safety gear system and to ensure fittings within the car
remain secure, ropes do not leave sheaves and filler weights in
counterweight frames do not become displaced.
Where there is no documented evidence of a previous successful test (in

accordance with requirements current at the time of installation) a test
should be performed to prove the system operates in accordance with
the standard applicable at the time of installation. The aim of this test is
to check the correct mounting, correct setting and the soundness of the
complete assembly, comprising car, safety gear, guide rails and their
fixing to the building. The test should also ensure that the safety gear and
car frame are capable of absorbing the loads imposed on them.
After the test, it should be ascertained that no deterioration which could

adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred. If necessary,
friction components may be replaced.
See Annex B.4 for further information on safety gear tests.

4.6.4 Safety gear operated by other means (other than

overspeed governor)
Some types of safety gears operate only on failure or slackening of the
main suspension system. Where documented evidence exists (signed
test document) that the safety gear system met the requirements current
at the time of installation, modification, replacement or refurbishment,
a rated speed empty car test should be conducted for car and any
counterweight safety gear. The objective of the test, is to ensure the
correct operation of the safety gear system and to ensure fittings within
the car remain secure, ropes do not leave sheaves and filler weights in
counterweight frames do not become displaced.
Where there is no documented evidence of a previous successful test

(with a rated load for car, empty car for counterweight) a test should be
performed to prove the system operates in accordance with the
requirements specified in the standard applicable at the time of
installation. When conducting the test the method should ensure the lift
is stopped by the safety gear without the assistance of the brake or
some other device. Any testing of these devices should be done by
referencing the OEM manuals for guidance to minimise any potential
wear or damage. The aim of this test is to check the correct mounting,
correct setting and the soundness of the complete assembly, comprising
car, safety gear, guide rails and their fixing to the building. The test
should also ensure that the safety gear and car frame are capable of
absorbing the loads imposed on them.
After any such supplementary test, it should be ascertained that no

deterioration, which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift,
has occurred. If necessary, friction components should be replaced.
4.7 Devices to prevent overspeed of the ascending lift carrier

Where a mechanical device has been installed to prevent overspeed of the
ascending lift car its operation should be tested. As part of the supplementary
test, all moving parts of the device should be checked for free and effective
operation, and for any signs of excessive deterioration and wear.
Where the device is a rope or sheave brake a supplementary dynamic test

should be carried out. Where the rated speed of the lift is 1m/s or less the
device should be tested at rated speed with an empty car. Where the rated
speed exceeds 1m/s the test should be made in accordance with the
manufacturer’s recommendations or at not less than 1 m/s with an empty
car. In some instances, the stopping device may be the lift machine brake
with suitable monitoring of brake operation and redundancy. Any testing of
these devices should be done by referencing the OEM manuals for
guidance to minimise any potential wear or damage. The objective of the
test, is to ensure the correct operation of the device.
Where there is no documented evidence of a previous successful test,

consideration should be given by the Competent Person to calling for a
supplementary test which proves the system operates in accordance with
requirements current at the time of installation. It is recommended that this
be included as a periodic test at 10 year intervals unless there is evidence
to suggest more frequent testing is required..
Where the device is a safety gear operated by a governor it should be

tested as defined in the relevant section (4.6) titled ‘Safety gear system
(governor, safety gear, suspension failure device)’.
4.8 Unintended Carrier Movement Protection (UCMP)

The UCMP system prevents the carrier moving away from the landing outside
a predefined zone with open doors. A UCMP system may be composed of
a detection device, an actuation device, and a stopping device.
In some instances, the UCMP stopping device may be the lift machine
brake with suitable monitoring of brake operation and redundancy. Where
it is feasible, the UCMP system should be tested at every thorough
examination by the competent person. If this is not possible, then the
Competent Person should call for a supplementary test on an annual basis.
The complete system should be subject to verification and test every time
any modification or adjustment is carried out.
For UCMP systems where the stopping device is other than a machine
brake as above, the following applies.
Thorough Examination and further regular visual checks of the system
should be carried out by the maintenance company.
Where there is no documented evidence of a previous successful

verification and test, consideration should be given by the Competent
Person to calling for a supplementary test which proves the system operates
in accordance with requirements current at the time of installation. Any
testing of these devices should be done by referencing the OEM manuals for
guidance to minimise any potential wear or damage. The objective of the
test, is to ensure the correct operation of the combined system.
It is recommended that this be included as a periodic test at 10 year intervals

4.9 Energy dissipation buffers

Visual examination of energy dissipation buffers will normally be carried
out by the Competent Person during the thorough examination to assess the
condition, note any leakage and carry out a functional test of the buffer
return switch.
To ensure that the piston returns to its fully extended position after the
buffer has been compressed, energy dissipation buffers, whose effective
operation cannot be verified and which do not have a buffer return switch,
should be subject to a slow speed, empty car supplementary test.
Thereafter, a supplementary test should be called for at 12 monthly
intervals unless it can be demonstrated that a more or less frequent test will
be adequate to ensure safety.
It is recommended that a supplementary test of all energy dissipation

buffers (including those fitted with a buffer return switch) at 5 yearly
intervals unless it can be demonstrated that a more or less frequent test will
be adequate to ensure safety. The supplementary test should determine that
all such energy dissipation buffers can be fully compressed and that they
then return to their extended position.
4.10 Suspension system

Suspension systems could include one of the following:
• conventional steel wire ropes;
• chains;
• ropes with a reduced traction sheave diameter not allowing “D/d”
required or suspension ropes of less than the minimum size;
• suspension belts;
• suspension ropes made from aramid;
• suspension ropes of steel wire with polymer coating.
Suspension systems should be examined for wear or damage at every

thorough examination of the lift by the Competent Person. In some
instances, an automatic monitoring device may be used to supplement
these inspections where the internal condition of the suspension system is
not visible. Where the condition cannot be determined, consideration
should be given by the Competent Person to calling for a supplementary
test which proves the condition of the suspension system. The OEM
manuals and manufacturers guidelines should be followed to determine the
method and frequency of supplementary testing.
4.11 Car overload detection warning devices

Where such a device has been fitted as required by the Lift Regulations or
where an overload detection warning device incorporating a visual display
is fitted then calibration of the device should be in accordance with the
manufacturer’s recommendations.
Where there is documentation to demonstrate that the design is such that it

degrades to a safe condition a supplementary test should not be required.
Where there is excessive car floor area in relation to rated load e.g. for
carrying lighter more bulky objects such as hospital trolleys etc then this
test should carried out at periodic intervals of 5 years.

manuals for guidance
Devices that measure load to provide information to the lift drive and other
systems are not overload warning detection devices.
4.12 Hydraulic system

The integrity of the hydraulic system (cylinder, pipes, valve block) should
be verified.
Where no documented evidence exists verifying the satisfactory operation

of the system, consideration should be given by the Competent Person to
calling for a supplementary test.
Thereafter, consideration should be given to calling for supplementary tests

at 5 yearly intervals unless it can be demonstrated that more frequent tests
are required or that less frequent tests will be adequate to ensure safety.
The test should consist of applying 200% of full load static pressure with an
empty car for a period of 15 minutes to the hydraulic system between and
including the non-return valve and the jack. The piston should be fully
extended and brought up to test pressure and allowed to rest for 10
minutes. The pressure should then be observed for a further 5 minutes. For
such a test to be considered successful there should be no loss of pressure
greater than 10% during the final 5 minute period.
Note: In exceptional circumstances following assessment, the Competent

Person may set a lower pressure provided it adequately assesses the
integrity of the system.
4.12.1 Hydraulic cylinders in boreholes or similar locations

If, by virtue of its position, it is not possible to ascertain the integrity of
the cylinder by either direct or indirect examination, it should be
subjected to a supplementary test. The necessity and/or frequency of the
test should depend on the presence or absence of corrosion protection
to the cylinder, signs of water in the pit or borehole, age of cylinder, any
unusual sinking of the car or unexplained loss of fluid and the existence
of other safety arresting devices such as a piston clamp.
This is potentially an expensive and disruptive process and should only

be carried out where there is sufficient evidence to indicate a defect
exists. It is recommended that this test should be carried out at a
periodic interval of 10 years unless it can be demonstrated that more
frequent tests are required or that less frequent tests will be adequate to
ensure safety, and if lifts have been modernised or upgraded but retain
the original cylinder and borehole.
In the event that the cylinder fails the pressure test and the cause of the
failure cannot be determined, the cylinder should be examined to
ascertain the cause of the problem. This may involve the removal of the
cylinder from its bore hole.
4.12.2 Hydraulic rupture/restrictor valves

The correct operation of rupture/restrictor valves should be verified by
performing an appropriate test. Where no evidence exists verifying the
satisfactory operation of the valves, consideration should be given by
the Competent Person to calling for such a supplementary test. It is
recommended that this test should be carried out at a periodic interval
of 5 years unless it can be demonstrated that more frequent tests are
required or that less frequent tests will be adequate to ensure safety.
As far as is possible, the verification test procedure should replicate the

rupture of a hydraulic pipe.
4.13 Anti-creep devices
4.13.1 Electrical anti-creep device

In order to verify that electrical anti-creep devices are in working order,
a functional test of each of the devices should be undertaken at every
Thorough Examination. Where this cannot be assessed the Competent
Person should use risk assessment (age, condition, evidence of creep
etc) to determine the requirement for supplementary testing.
4.13.2 Mechanical anti-creep device (pawl or clamping device)

Linkages and all moving parts of any mechanical device should be
checked at every Thorough Examination for free and effective operation
and for any signs of deterioration and wear. A rated load test of the device
should be carried out at intervals to be determined by the Competent
Person based on risk assessment (age, condition, evidence of creep etc).
4.14 Low pressure detection devices

There is often confusion between the low pressure switch and the low
pressure valve. The low pressure valve is an important safety component and
if this is not present it should be strongly recommended that one is fitted.
Low pressure switch

Any low pressure switch should be checked for satisfactory operation at
every thorough examination. Where this is not possible, a
supplementary test should be carried out.
Low pressure valve

Any low pressure valve should be checked for satisfactory operation at
every thorough examination, where this is not possible a supplementary
test of the low pressure valve should be carried out to ascertain
satisfactory operation.
Slack rope device

Any slack rope device (activation of the device and switch) should be
checked for satisfactory operation at every thorough examination.
Where this is not possible a supplementary test should be carried out.
Unless there is evidence to show that such tests have been carried out
during routine maintenance, it is recommended that these tests should be
carried out at a periodic interval of 12 months unless it can be
demonstrated that more frequent tests are required or that less frequent tests
will be adequate to ensure safety.
4.15 Traction, brake and levelling

The Competent Person would normally as part of Thorough Examination:
• check that the lift stops at floor levels with an acceptable levelling
accuracy for the drive and braking system;
• check that the brake stops the empty lift car travelling in the upward
direction, without loss of traction or excessive slide, in the upper part of
the lift well;
• inspect the visible components of the brake.
If during Thorough Examination the Competent Person finds traction, brake

or levelling performance to be unsatisfactory then the Competent Person
should call for supplementary tests to establish the cause.
On some modern brakes where the lift machine brake is used as the
stopping device for ascending carrier overspeed protection or UCMP, with
suitable monitoring of brake operation and redundancy, it might not be
possible to access all of the brake parts for examination. Reference should
be made to the testing procedure in the OEM manuals.
Traditional brakes, before the introduction of self-monitoring, and

especially where the drive systems have been updated e.g. with variable
speed drives, checks should be made that the machine does not drive
through the brake (in the event of the brake not lifting correctly) and that
the brake stops a lift car travelling downwards with 125% of rated load in
the lift car. Where no documented evidence exists verifying that these have
been checked, consideration should be given by the Competent Person to
calling for supplementary tests.
It is recommended that these tests should be carried out at a periodic

interval of 5 years.

manuals for guidance.

4.16 Car/Counterweight balance

Where the Competent Person has reason to believe that modification has
been carried out to the lift which either increase or decrease its mass (such
as relining of the car, loose counterweight filler weights on the car top) then
a check should be carried out to confirm the car mass and counterweight
balance is as the manufacturer’s specification.
Generally, and especially in model lift designs under the Lifts Regulations,
an increase in car mass has implications for the suspension and safety
devices rating which may be exceeded. A reduction in car mass has
implications for traction which might be compromised.
For the minimum and maximum allowed car masses and counterweight
balance, reference should be made to the OEM manuals or
manufacturers guidance.
4.17 Automatic power operated doors

Where no documented evidence exists verifying that the kinetic energy and
closing force of the door system has been checked, consideration should
be given by the Competent Person to calling for such supplementary tests.
It is recommended that these tests should be carried out at a periodic
interval of 5 years.
Supplementary testing should be carried out on every occasion that a change

is made e.g. adjustment of door controller such as increase in speed or torque
parameters, replacement or new door operator or change of door panels.
Any testing of the door systems should be done by referencing the OEM
manuals for guidance.
4.18 Other supplementary tests

The list of key components specifically mentioned above in this chapter is
by no means exhaustive. Where there are components or functions which
cannot readily be tested as part of the thorough examination, the Competent
Person should call for supplementary testing of these components or functions.
Unless there is evidence to show that such tests have been carried out
during routine maintenance, it is recommended that these tests should be
carried out at a periodic interval of 12 months unless it can be
demonstrated that more frequent tests are required or that less frequent tests
will be adequate to ensure safety.
The Competent Person should specify the detail of any test required and
how they should be carried out taking account of the guidance in any OEM
manuals and guidance available e.g. BS 8899. See Annex A.25 for an open
format report of examination and test.
Examples of such components or functions, depending on the type of lift,

may include:
• Emergency release/ rescue operation;
• Devices to ensure adequate refuge spaces in the lift pit and headroom
e.g. pre-triggered stopping system;
• Fire recall function e.g. as BS EN 81-73 where this cannot be checked
as part of thorough examination;
• Evacuation control and other aspects e.g. operation on secondary
power supplies where this cannot be checked as part of thorough
examination. See BS 8899:2016, clause 8 for recommendations on
thorough examination;
• Firefighters control and other aspects e.g. operation on secondary
power supplies where this cannot be checked as part of thorough
examination. See BS 8899:2016, clause 8 and Annex D for an example
of an annual firefighters lift operational inspection report.
Section 5
Annex A
The Examination and Test Certificate and Report(s) contained at Annex A
are available in electronic format on the SAFed website www.safed.co.uk.
They are guidance on a recommended format for reporting the results of
supplementary tests and are intended for use by companies and persons
competent to carry out the designated supplementary tests and who are
bona fide holders of this document. Such companies or persons may adjust
or otherwise alter these reports for their own use and to allow for company
identity and any special particulars relating to the lift, the test, the site and
the company carrying out the test. However in all cases the reports must
contain the data required to identify the actual lift, the site, the date and
details of the test(s) carried out and the company or person carrying out the
supplementary test(s). Responsibility for and ownership of the Certificate of
Examination and Test(s) and of completed Report(s) lies wholly with the
company or person issuing the Certificate and Report(s) and not with the
Safety Assessment Federation or its agents.
Periodicities detailed within this document are for guidance only and
all supplementary tests are to be carried out at the request and discretion
of the competent person. The report formats address the most common
lift arrangements. Where non-standard arrangements have been adopted,
all examination(s) and test(s) appropriate to the equipment installed and
any other test(s) instructed and detailed by the competent person should
be carried out and documented.

Annex A - COVERING CERTIFICATE AND REPORT(S) OF

SUPPLEMENTARY TEST(S)
Unique report reference ID
Report of examination and test(s) - Principle
The Competent Person should specify by reference to the specific number of the clause(s)
of these Guidelines on the report of thorough examination issued to the owner of any
supplementary test(s) required to determine that the lift is safe.
In cases where tests other than those specified in this document are required, the Competent
Person should detail exactly what is required and how the test(s) should be conducted.
Covering Certificate of examination and test(s)

Owner/Occupier of premises
Address
Type of lift(s) and description
Owner’s Identification Number(s)
Manufacturer’s Serial Number(s) (If known)
Location of lift(s)
To be completed by the person or corporate body carrying out the supplementary test.
Signed Position
Print Name
Lift I.D. / Ref Date
Reports of supplementary test(s)

The following suggested forms provide the information to be contained for the results of
supplementary test(s) that have been conducted following a Thorough Examination of a Lift.
Periodicities detailed within this document are for guidance only and all supplementary tests
are to be carried out at the request and discretion of the Competent Person.
The report formats address the most common lift arrangements. Where non-standard
arrangements have been adopted, all examination(s) and test(s) appropriate to the
equipment installed and any other test(s) instructed and detailed by the Competent
Person should be carried out and documented.
Reports attached: (e.g. A1, A4, A8)

Page 1 of (e.g. 4)
Annex A.1 - EARTH CONTINUITY

Reference clause 4.1
State method of test
Complete as applicable
• Is the maximum continuity resistance to the earth 0.5Ω or less? Yes No
• Has the fuse protection of the safety circuit been satisfactorily Yes No
tested by either a purpose made device or by measuring the
resistance of the circuit and calculating the short circuit current
or test according to the OEM manual?
If No, explain below:
• Does the result of the supplementary test(s) indicate further Yes No

remedial work is necessary?
If Yes, state your recommendation(s) for further action required:
Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.2 - ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES

Reference clause 4.2, but see also Annex B.1 for a non-exhaustive list
of safety switches
Description and location of safety device(s) being inspected/tested and method of test:
• Does the switch operate satisfactorily? Yes No
• Is all wiring, including earth wires, properly terminated and in Yes No

good condition?
• Can it be determined that all parts are clean, secure and free of Yes No
excessive wear with no signs of burning, or physical damage?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.3 - TERMINAL SPEED REDUCTION SYSTEMS

• Does the terminal speed reduction system ensure that the lift Yes No
slows down automatically to a speed not greater than the buffer
design impact speed?
How was the system tested?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.4 - LANDING DOOR INTERLOCKS

• Do the electrical interlocks operate satisfactorily? Yes No
• Does the mechanical locking operate satisfactory? Yes No
• Is all wiring, including earth wires, properly terminated and in Yes No

good condition?
• Are all parts clean, secure and free of excessive wear with no Yes No
signs of burning or physical damage?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.5 - LIFT MACHINE - INVESTIGATORY TEST (TYPE A)

Reference clause 4.5 and 4.5.1 and Annex B.3
Investigatory examination
Gearbox Type/Model:
Manufacturer:
Year of Manufacture: (if known)
Identification Number: (if known)
• Does the machine run without excessive or unexpected noise, Yes No

vibration or heat?
• Does the machine run without excessive backlash and end float? Yes No
• Are gear wheel teeth markings even and approximately central Yes No
of the teeth?
• Are gear teeth free of steps, pitting or ridges? Yes No
• Is gear oil clean and free of any metal particles? Yes No
• Are all rim bolts and shaft keys present and secure? Yes No
• Are all bearings and shafts running without signs of excessive Yes No
or unexpected heat, noise or vibration?
• For screw and nut drives is the wear on the load nut and any Yes No
chain extension within acceptable limits?
• Is the gearbox in a satisfactory condition? (If no, then detailed Yes No
reasons to be given)
(See A.5 Continuation sheet)

Annex A.5 - CONTINUATION SHEET
• Is there any reason why a more detailed examination ‘type B’ Yes No

is required?
If Yes, explain below:

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.6 - LIFT MACHINE - COMPREHENSIVE TEST (TYPE B)

Reference clause 4.5 and 4.5.2 and Annex B.3
Comprehensive examination
Gearbox Type/Model:
Manufacturer:
Year of Manufacture: (if known)
Identification Number: (if known)
• Does the machine run free from excessive or unexpected noise, Yes No
vibration or heat?
• Are gear wheel teeth markings even and approximately central Yes No
of the teeth?
• Are gear teeth free of steps, pitting or ridges? Yes No
• Is gear oil clean and free of any metal particles? Yes No
• Are all rim bolts and shaft keys present and secure? Yes No
• Are all bearings and shafts running with no signs of excessive or Yes No
unexpected heat, noise or vibration?
• Is the gearbox in satisfactory condition? Yes No
(See A.6 Continuation sheet 1)

Annex A.6 - CONTINUATION SHEET - 1

The following dimensions are to be measured and recorded:
Crown wheel and worm

Complete as appropriate Complete as applicable
• Backlash: Measured mm Satisfactory? Yes No
• Backlash: Measured mm Satisfactory? Yes No
State your comments and observations on Continuation Sheet - 2
Gearbox, plain shafts & bearings

Shaft/Bearing Location: Bearing running clearance mm:
• Provide details of any non destructive testing
• Details and result of any oil analysis
• Details of any other tests performed
(See A.6 Continuation sheet 2)

Annex A.6 - CONTINUATION SHEET - 2

Comments and observations:

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.7 - OVERSPEED GOVERNORS

Reference clause 4.6 and 4.6.1
Date of last recorded dynamic test if known:
Tick as appropriate
Indicate Car or Counterweight Car Counterweight
Governor type:
Serial number:
• Does the overspeed governor have a permanent label indicating Yes No

the tripping speeds?
• Is the overspeed governor calibration correct for the rated speed Yes No
of the lift and safety gear?
• Does the pull through force of the governor effectively engage Yes No
the safety gear against the guide rails?
How was the overspeed governor tested?

Complete as appropriate
Tripping speed
Marked Measured
Car up Car down
Electrical 1: m/s m/s
Electrical 2: m/s m/s
Mechanical: m/s m/s

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.8 - GOVERNOR OPERATED SAFETY GEAR

INSTANTANEOUS TYPE
Tick as appropriate
Safety gear type and/or reference:
• Are all linkages and moving parts free of any defects, deterioration Yes No
or wear that may prevent their free and effective operation?
• Are the surfaces of any friction elements free of any abnormal or Yes No
excessive wear that may prevent free and effective operation of
the safety gear system?
• Does the safety gear mechanism move freely and engage the Yes No
guide rails satisfactorily?
Dynamic test conditions (where appropriate)

• Load in car? kg
• Speed at activation? m/s


• Did the safety gear operate and stop the car as required? Yes No

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.9 - GOVERNOR OPERATED SAFETY GEAR

PROGRESSIVE TYPE
Reference clause 4.6, 4.6.3 and Annex B.4
Tick as appropriate


• Load in car? kg



Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.10 - SAFETY GEAR OPERATED BY OTHER MEANS

Tick as appropriate

• Load in car? kg
How was the safety gear activated?


• State the stopping distance (Progressive types only) mm
• Does the safety gear stop the car or counterweight in the Yes N/A* No
downward direction during dynamic testing?
• Was the floor of the lift car sloping less than 5° to the Yes N/A* No
horizontal after the safety gear has activated and before it
is released?
• After the test, confirm that no deterioration has occurred Yes N/A* No
that could adversely affect the safety of the lift and
correct operation of the safety gear system.
* Some safety gear systems (slack rope type) may not be possible to operate. In such
circumstances indicate above that a dynamic test has not been made and describe below
in detail what has been inspected, the condition of the device, the probability
of successful operation and why it could not be operated.

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.11 - DEVICES TO PREVENT OVERSPEED OF THE

ASCENDING LIFT CARRIER
Date of last recorded dynamic test: (If known)
Device type and/or reference:
the braking device?
• Does the device mechanism move freely and engage the ropes Yes No
or pulley etc. satisfactorily?
• Does the device operate satisfactorily during dynamic testing? Yes No
• After the test, confirm that no deterioration has occurred that Yes No
could adversely affect the safety of the lift and correct operation
of the system.

• Load in car? kg
How was the device activated?



Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.12 - UNINTENDED CAR MOVEMENT

PROTECTION MEANS
Date of last recorded dynamic test: (If known)
Device type and/or reference:
• Does the device stop the lift car within the specified stopping Yes No
distance?
• Does the device operate satisfactorily during dynamic testing? Yes No
• After the test, confirm that no deterioration has occurred that Yes No
could adversely affect the safety of the lift and correct operation
of the system

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.13 - ENERGY DISSIPATION BUFFERS

For buffers without return switch
• After compression does the piston return to its fully extended Yes No
position within 15 minutes?
For all buffers

• Does the buffer compress when the car is moved down onto it? Yes No
• After compression does the piston return to its fully extended Yes No
position?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.14 - SUSPENSION SYSTEM

• Describe suspension means (synthetic ropes, flat belts etc.)
• State your observations from visual inspection of suspension means and anchorages
• Are all suspension ropes/chains/belts free from signs of wear Yes No

or damage that may prevent their continued use until the next
Thorough Examination?
How was the suspension system tested?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.15 - CAR OVERLOAD DETECTION

WARNING DEVICES
Date of last recorded test: (If known)
• Does the overload device and its car indicator operate correctly Yes No
to prevent use of the lift?
• Is the load at which it is set or calibrated satisfactory to prevent Yes No
overloading?
• State the load at which the detection device operates kg

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.16 - HYDRAULIC SYSTEM

Complete as appropriate or as applicable
• State the full load static pressure (measured or calculated). Bar

• Is the pressure test as described in 4.12 satisfactory? Yes No
• State pressure drop (if applicable) Bar

• Is this pressure drop acceptable? Yes No
• After the above test, is the integrity of the hydraulic system Yes No
maintained?
• Does the pressure relief valve operate satisfactorily? Yes No

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.17 - HYDRAULIC CYLINDERS IN BOREHOLES OR

SIMILAR LOCATIONS
Reference clause 4.12.1
• State the full load static pressure (measured or calculated). Bar

• Is there evidence of any significant pressure drop or leakage? Yes No
If Yes, explain below:
• State pressure drop (if applicable) Bar

• Is this pressure drop acceptable? Yes No
• After the above test, is the integrity of the hydraulic Yes No

system maintained?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.18 - HYDRAULIC RUPTURE/ RESTRICTOR VALVES

Reference clause 4.12.2
• Does the rupture/restrictor valve operate correctly? Yes No
Note: A restrictor valve should lower the car at a speed not exceeding 0.3m/s

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.19 - ELECTRICAL ANTI-CREEP DEVICE

• Does the anti-creep device operate satisfactorily within the Yes No

unlocking zone at each floor?
• Does the anti-creep device operate both when the car and Yes No
landing doors are open and when they are closed at each floor?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.20 - MECHANICAL ANTI-CREEP DEVICE

(PAWL OR CLAMPING DEVICE)
the braking device?
• Are the contact surfaces of any engaging components correctly Yes No
aligned, in good condition and free of any abnormal or excessive
wear that may prevent free and effective engagement?
• Does the device mechanism move freely and engage satisfactorily Yes No
with full load in the lift car?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.21 - LOW PRESSURE DETECTION DEVICES

Device type and/or reference
• Does the low pressure detection operate satisfactorily? Yes No

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.22 - TRACTION, BRAKE AND LEVELLING

• Does the brake lift correctly Yes No

State operating voltage: V
• Is the brake adjusted correctly in accordance with Yes No
OEM instructions?
• Are all gripping components within the brake in a Yes No
satisfactory condition?
• Are all other components of the brake system in a Yes No
satisfactory condition?
• For brakes where one braking element can be disabled (check Yes No
OEM instructions), does the brake with each braking element
disabled (check both) hold the empty lift car?
• Where the brake is fitted with monitoring devices, do these Yes No
function correctly in accordance with OEM instructions?
• Does the brake stop the empty lift car travelling in the upward Yes No
direction, without loss of traction or excessive slide in the
upper part of the lift well?
• Does the brake stop the lift car with 125% load in the car Yes No
travelling in the down direction in the lower part of the lift
well without excessive slide?
• With the machine driving against the de-energised brake, Yes No
does the brake hold the lift car stationary or the drive shut
down in an acceptable time??



Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.23 - CAR/COUNTERWEIGHT BALANCE

• Where the car mass has been changed, state the empty car mass kg
• State the balance percentage as found %
• Is the mass of the empty car and balance correct as Yes No
OEM instructions?
State the method of determining the balance

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.24 - AUTOMATIC POWER OPERATED DOORS

• Is the force to prevent closing of the car and landing doors Yes No
150 N or less?
• Is the kinetic energy of the car and landing doors 10 J or less? Yes No
• Do all the protective devices reverse the doors? Yes No
• If the doors are able to close with the reversal device deactivated Yes No
or having failed, is the kinetic energy no more than 4 J and
accompanied by an audible signal?
• For doors made from glass (except for vision panels) is the force Yes No
to prevent opening of the car and landing doors 150 N or less?

Signed Position
Print Name

Annex A.25 - OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY TESTS

Component or function to be tested:
State method of test:
• Does the component or function operate satisfactorily? Yes No

Signed Position
Print Name

Section 6
Annex B

ANNEX B (INFORMATIVE) - TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Annex B is intended to provide the Competent Person with additional technical

information in the assessment of the need for supplementary tests.
• Electrical safety devices

• Guide to reduced stroke buffering
• Machine system components
• Developments in British Standards for the requirements of safety gear tests
• Suspension systems
• Suspension chains
• Hydraulic systems
B.1 Electrical safety devices

Electrical safety devices include (but are not limited to):
• Main isolator circuit breaker • Stop switch(es) on car top

control switch • Suspension rope/chain tension
• Removable hand-winding wheel equalising device switch
switch • Safety gear switch
• Overspeed governor switch • Contact on pit entry door
• Overspeed governor re-set switch • Stop switch in pit
• Ascending car overspeed switch • Check of the stored position of pit
• Slack rope/chain switch (positive ladder
drive lift) • Switch on compensating sheave
• Stop switch in pulley room • Switch on anti-rebound device
• Landing door locks • Overspeed governor rope tension
• Slave door contacts switch
• Inspection and/or emergency door • Buffer return switch (energy
interlocks dissipation type)
• Car door contact switch • Reduced stroke buffer switch
• Car door lock • Final limit switches
• Car docking operation stop switch • Proving device for slowdown
• Car emergency door/ trap door • Levelling/re-levelling limit switches
interlock • Docking operation limit switch
• Contacts of devices protecting • Car overload detection
working spaces or refuge spaces
B.2 Guide to reduced stroke buffering

Some lifts with speeds of 2.5 m/s or greater have buffers provided where the
stroke is less than that normally required to stop the lifts at a rate of
deceleration of less than 1gn (9.81m/s2). Where these reduced stroke buffers
are provided the lift should also have a feature that ensures it cannot impact
the buffer at a speed greater than that for which it is designed. This feature may
be referred to as Terminal Speed Reduction or Reduced Stroke Buffering.
It is not always evident that this feature is provided but if the overspeed governor
contract speed is greater than the maximum impact speed of the buffer or the
impact length of the buffer stroke is less than Table 1, such a feature should have
been provided and its operation should therefore be checked.
Table 1 - LENGTH OF BUFFER STROKE

Lift speed (m/s) Stroke (mm)
2.5 ≥ 420
3.0 ≥ 606
3.5 ≥ 825
4.0 ≥ 1078
4.5 ≥ 1360
5.0 ≥ 1680
6.0 ≥ 2420
B.3 Machine system components

B.3.1 Shafts and bearings
The objective to be met when inspecting plain shafts and bearings of
any age is to determine if a critical failure is likely to occur in the
foreseeable future.
The dismantling of shafts and bearings is not to be undertaken lightly as

such intrusive inspections can create more problems and risks than they
resolve. It may however be necessary in cases where other less intrusive
inspections indicate there is cause for concern. In such cases a more
detailed inspection is essential.
B.3.2 Roller, ball and needle bearings

Exposure of these types of bearing for examination should be undertaken
only when evidence obtained from other methods of examination indicates
that a more detailed assessment is required. If the above examinations
indicate problems may exist a further more detailed examination should be
carried out by a specialist.
The results of the investigatory examination should be documented as

shown at Annex A.5. The report should also advise if and when a similar
investigatory examination should be repeated or whether a comprehensive
examination is required, as shown in Annex A.6 and the reasons for it.
B.3.3 Traction sheaves, bearings and pulleys

It may be considered appropriate at the time of the supplementary test of
the gearbox to carry out checks on the condition of pulleys, bearings,
traction sheaves, diverter and suspension pulleys whilst the load has been
removed from the drive system.
Suitable non-destructive testing or examination of areas subject to high

stress loadings (e.g. shouldered shafts and keyways) should be undertaken;
alignment checks may also be necessary.
B.4 Developments in British Standards of the requirements for safety gear tests
Table 2 - DEVELOPMENTS IN BRITISH STANDARDS OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY GEAR TESTS
Standard Summary of design Summary of test Comment
BS 2655-1 Safety gear to stop and hold car with • Test at site with full load at governor tripping speed • Instantaneous type safety gears used up to 160 fpm
100% load at governor tripping speed or
1958 • All electrical switches except governor switch operating • Governor trip speed not to exceed 200 fpm
at failure of suspension
• Check guide slide marks • Governor trip speeds and safety gear slide distance
defined in graphs
BS 2655-1 Safety gear to stop and hold car with • Testing not defined in BS2655 part 1 but in BS2655 part 7 Testing • Instantaneous type safety gears up to 150 fpm
1970 • Test at site with full load at contract speed • Governor trip speed not to exceed 200 fpm
BS 5655-1 Safety gear to stop and hold car with • Instantaneous type or instantaneous with buffered effect test with full load at • Instantaneous type safety gears up to 0.63m/s
100% load at governor tripping speed or rated speed
1979 • Instantaneous with buffered effect up to 1m/s
• Progressive types, test with 125% load at levelling speed
• Governor trip speed not to exceed 200 fpm
BS 5655-1 Safety gear to stop and hold car with • Instantaneous type or instantaneous with buffered effect test with full load at • Instantaneous type safety gears up to 0.63m/s
1986 • Instantaneous with buffered effect up to 1m/s
• BS5655 part 10 1986 addressed testing and required the following:
1 Instantaneous full load at rated speed
2 Progressive with type test, 125% load at levelling speed.
3 Progressive without type test, full load at governor tripping speed
BS EN 81 Safety gear to stop and hold car with • Instantaneous type or instantaneous with buffered effect test with full load at
1998 at failure of suspension
• Progressive types test with 125% load at rated speed or at levelling speed
&
Amendments • British Standard PAS 32 addresses testing and requires the following:
1 Instantaneous full load at rated speed
2 Progressive with type test, 125% load at levelling speed
BS EN 81-20 Safety gear to stop and hold car with • Instantaneous type with rated load at rated speed
2014 • Progressive types with 125% load at rated speed or lower
& 2020 • BS 8486-3 addresses testing and requires the following:
1 Instantaneous type at rated load at rated speed
2 Progressive types with 125% load at rated speed or lower
B.5 Suspension system data

B.5.1 Suspension ropes
All factors affecting rope condition should be taken into account and the
Competent Person should decide the degree of wear that can be tolerated
and the stage at which replacement becomes necessary.
Typical factors creating visible change in any suspension rope condition

include:
• the number of broken wires and their position
• surface wear
• inequality in rope tension
• excessive stretching8
• inequality in diameter
• external evidence of internal conditions e.g. corrosion.
The following concerning the state and replacement of ropes should

also be noted:
• Severely corroded ropes cannot be restored to serviceable condition by
a belated application of lubricant.
• When replacement of a suspension rope is necessary, all the suspension
ropes of that lift must be renewed together.
• The latest date for replacement should be specified on any report of
thorough examination.
In the absence of any national regulations or instruction from the original

equipment manufacturer, the following is a general guide to discard.
In the case of ropes operating in sheaves other than cast iron or steel, the
Competent Person should be aware of the possibility of more advanced
internal deterioration occurring than that which might be visually obvious
from the outside.
8 An indication of excessive rope stretch can be gained from suitable monitoring of

counterweight bottom over-run dimensions
B.5.1.1 Broken wires

Broken wires are normally the result of progressive deterioration due to
fatigue and wear.
Table 3 indicates the number of visible broken wires in the worst section
of a single layer rope with a fibre core within the set at which replacement
or next examination should take place within a specified period and at
which replacement should take place immediately. The values apply to
suspension ropes, governor ropes and compensating ropes.
For other types of ropes, guidance on the number of allowable visible

broken wires should be provided by the rope manufacturer.
Table 3 - NUMBER OF VISIBLE BROKEN WIRES - SINGLE LAYER ROPES

WITH FIBRE CORES OPERATING IN CAST IRON OR STEEL SHEAVES
Condition Replace ropes or examine within a Discard ropes immediately
specified period as stated by the
competent person
Class 6 x 19 FC Class 8 x 19 FC Class 6 x 19 FC Class 8 x 19 FC
Broken wires More than More than More than More than
randomly 12 per rope lay * 15 per rope lay * 24 per rope lay * 30 per rope lay *
distributed
among the
outer strands
Broken wires More than More than More than More than
predominating 6 per rope lay * 8 per rope lay * 8 per rope lay * 10 per rope lay *
in one or two
outer strands
Adjacent 4 4 More than 4 More than 4
broken wires
in one outer
strand
Valley breaks 1 per rope lay * 1 per rope lay * More than More than
1 per rope lay * 1 per rope lay *
* The length of one rope lay is approximately equivalent to 6 x d
(where d is the nominal rope diameter).
B.5.1.2 Wear and age

Factors to which particular attention should be paid, taking account of site
conditions and type of drive, include diametric reduction, rope life and
other unusual features indicating the possibility of failure.
B.5.1.2.1 Diametric reduction

In the case of traction drives with ‘U’, ‘V’ or undercut grooves, a
reduction of more than 6% on the nominal diameter of the rope is a
guide for rejection on the grounds of reduced rope strength.
In other instances, when 6 and 8 strand ropes are working over metal
pulleys, a reduction of more than 10% of the nominal diameter of the
rope is a guide for rejection.
B.5.1.2.2 Rope life

Although the life of a suspension rope depends on many factors, in
general the greatest factors affecting rope life are:
• the number of bends made by the rope and
• the radius of such bends.
The following factors should also be noted:

• Particular attention is required for ropes on installations having a
pulley/rope diameter ratio less than 40:1.
• Uneven wear on traction sheaves may result in rope slip and tension
differences in the ropes.
• Any twisting of ropes resulting from poor installation or absence of
restraint to twisting of anchorage points, may result in accelerated
wear of ropes and/or sheaves.
It should be appreciated that no definitive guide as to the life of a

suspension rope can be given, but particular care should be exercised
where the ropes are more than ten years old or where the lift has a
history of short rope life.
When ropes are replaced, the date of replacement should be recorded

and be readily accessible to the Competent Person.
B.5.1.2.3 Unusual features

Unusual features, indicating the possibility of failure,
may be present; e.g.
• ropes exuding a red dust or rouge
• a local reduction in diameter
• displaced strands
• unstable form
• localised indentation
In such cases replacement should be considered.
B.5.2 Lubrication
Lubricants, applied during rope manufacture to provide corrosion
protection, are usually adequate for initial in-use service.
A slightly oily deposit on the rope sheave grooves is a good indication of

the correct degree of lubrication; inadequate or excessive lubrication is to
be avoided. (The latter may cause slip between rope and traction sheaves
to occur).
Factors that can affect rope lubrication include:

• a hostile environment causing ‘drying out’
• an inner core that retains corrosive elements and causes internal
corrosion (This may be indicated by excessive rope stretch)
Other factors include:

• Where there is evidence of corrosion the original lubricant may prove
to be inadequate and it may be necessary to dress the rope with an
approved non-acid lubricant to inhibit corrosion.
• Care should be taken where ropes have man-made fibre inner cores as
their ability to retain the initial dressing differs from ropes with natural
fibre cores.
B.5.3 Suspension rope terminations

Suspension rope terminations or anchorages should be fitted in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and should comply with
an appropriate British, European or other recognised Standard that
provides equivalent strength.
At every Thorough Examination suspension rope terminations should be

closely examined for signs of movement, fracturing, deterioration or wear
and broken wires.
B.6 Suspension chains

B.6.1 Wear and age
Assessment of the wear and age of suspension chains should include the
examination of round link chains, plate link chains, sprocket or chain
wheels and the identification and measurement of most worn chain section.
B.6.1.1 Round link chains

It is particularly important to examine round link chains at the points
where wear due to contact with the chain wheel may occur i.e.:
• at the point of contact between adjacent links and
• at the crown of the links
B.6.1.2 Plate link chains

Plate link chains and bushed roller chains should be examined for:
• cracked or missing link plates
• loose or worn pins with damaged heads
• evidence of pitting due to rust or corrosion - particularly on the
outer faces of link plates
• pins rotating in the outer plates
• loss of free movement (stiff chain)
• wear on link plate edges i.e. that caused by running over the
pulleys. Any reduction due to wear of link plate edge should not
exceed 5% of the original dimension. Replacement of mating
sprockets and/or pulleys should also be considered when replacing
the chains
• anchor pin locking device damaged or missing
• wear and corrosion of the anchor pin and anchor
• wear between pins and plates and/or associated components, or
stretching. Before measuring chain extension it is essential that the
chain is loaded
• confirmation that no joints are included in the loaded section of the
suspension chain
B.6.1.3 Sprocket or chain wheels

The sprocket or chain wheel should also be examined
B.6.1.4 Identification and measurements of most worn chain section

The most worn section of the chain should be identified and
measurements made over a minimum of ten pitches in at least three
locations. The maximum measured extension over the nominal length,
as specified or as measured on an unworn section of the chain, should
not exceed the manufacturer’s recommended figure. Where no such
guidance is given, a figure of up to 3% should be used.
B.6.2 Replacement
When replacement of one chain is necessary, all chains on that lift must
be renewed. The maximum allowable face wear in respect of plate link
chain is 5%. Replacement of mating sprockets and/or pulleys should also
be considered when replacing the chains. Only chains, anchorages and
anchorage pins as specified by the original lift manufacturer, or those
manufactured to an equivalent specification, should be fitted. If any of the
other defects identified above are found, the severity of the defect and the
normal conditions in which use is envisaged, will be used by the
Competent Person to determine whether renewal of the chain is required.
B.6.3 Lubrication
At intervals recommended by the lift manufacturer/installer and with the
chain in-situ in a slack condition, chains, anchors and pins should be
lubricated. It should be confirmed that only lubricants approved by the lift
manufacturer/installer are being used. In a hostile environment, special
lubricants may be required; these should be agreed with the lift
manufacturer/installer and the chain manufacturer.
B.7 Hydraulic systems

The purpose of pressure testing hydraulic buried cylinders at frequent intervals
is to establish a history of the cylinder that will enable any change in its
performance to be observed. The test may be made by pressurising the cylinder
directly at the cylinder or by pressurising the system between the valve block
and the cylinder.
B.8 History of British Standards requirements for pressure testing

of hydraulic lift systems
Table 4 gives the history of British Standards requirements for pressure testing
of hydraulic lift systems.
Table 4 - HISTORY OF BRITISH STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS FOR

PRESSURE TESTING OF HYDRAULIC LIFT SYSTEMS
Standard Summary of requirements Requirements for test
for design of cylinder/piston.
(design pressure)
BS 2655 None None
pre 1970
BS 2655 Cylinders rams, valves and pipes No test was defined in the
to withstand 2 x max normal standard as it was assumed that
1970 operating pressure if correctly designed the system
would withstand twice the
pressure under test
BS 5655-2 Cylinders rams, valves and pipes No test was defined in the
to withstand 2 x max normal standard as it was assumed that
1983 operating pressure if correctly designed the system
would withstand twice the
pressure under test
BS 5655-2 Proof test based on 2.3 x full Annex D called for 200% full
load pressure with a safety load static pressure test
1988 factor of 1.7
BS 5655 part 10 1986 called for
200% full load static pressure test
BS EN 81-2 Proof test based on 2.3 x full Annex D called for 200% full
load pressure with a safety load static pressure test
1998 &
factor of 1.7
Amendments PAS 32 and BS 8486-2:2007 call
for 200% full load static
BS EN 81-20 Proof test based on 2.3 x full Clause 6.3.10 of EN 81-20 calls
load pressure with a safety for 200% full load static
2014 factor of 1.7 pressure test
& 2020
BS 8486-3:2017 calls for 200%
full load static pressure test
B.9 Non-destructive testing

During thorough examination of a hoist's structure and mechanism, it may be
appropriate to use certain non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques to assess
the integrity of components. These techniques can assist in the detection of
cracks or wear that might grow in service and ultimately lead to failure.
NDT techniques should only be carried out by adequately trained and

experienced persons who should be briefed on the purpose and extent of the
NDT examination required, for example, the typical locations and type of
defect anticipated.
Guidance on the qualifications and certification of persons undertaking NDT is

given in BS EN ISO 9712:2012: Non-destructive testing - Qualification and
certification of NDT personnel - General principles.
The three most common types of NDT used for in-service inspections
of hoists are:
• ultrasonic examination
• dye penetrant
• magnetic particle examination.
For further information on these types of NDT, HSE has published:

• Best practice for the procurement and conduct of
non-destructive testing
• Part 1 - Manual ultrasonic inspection
• Part 2 - Magnetic particle and dye penetrant inspection
Useful links can be found on the HSE internet site:-

www.hse.gov.uk
Section 7
Annex C

ANNEX C - 2019/2020 REVIEW COMMITTEE

Safety Assessment Federation (SAFed)
Lift and Escalator Industry Association (LEIA)
PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE
BAA PLC
Carillion PLC
Chartered Institute of Building Service Engineers (CIBSE) City of Westminster
Independent National Inspection and Testing Association (INITA) Lift Forum
Transport for London (London Underground)
Section 8
Bibliography

BIBLIOGRAPHY
(1) L21, Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999
- Approved Code of Practice.
(2) L22, Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
(3) L24, Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
- Approved Code of Practice and Guidance.
(4) L113, Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998
(5) INDG 73(rev3), Working Alone in Safety - Controlling the risks of
solitary work.
(6) INDG 339(rev1), Thorough examination and testing of lifts
- Simple guidance for lift owners.
(7) INDG 401(rev2) The Work at Height Regulations 2005 (as amended)
Safety Assessment Federation Limited
Unit 4, 70 South Lambeth Road, Vauxhall, London SW8 1RL
Tel: +44 (0)20 7582 3208
www.safeduk.co.uk and www.safed.ie

Safed Guidelines June 2020.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Safed Guidelines June 2020.

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Safed Guidelines June 2020.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidelines

on the supplementary tests of in-service lifts

LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020

The Safety Assessment Federation - SAFed - represents

© 2020 SAFETY ASSESSMENT FEDERATION

The certificate and reports in Annex 5 are available electronically at either

ISSUE STATUS AND REVISIONS

03 February 2009 II 6.7

04 June 2020 New document

04.1 June 2020 Error on page 5.25,

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1

Section 2 LEGAL COMMENTARY 2.1

2.4.2 Report of thorough examination 2.4

Section 3 PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 3.1

Section 4 SUPPLEMENTARY TESTS 4.1

4.10 Suspension system 4.11

Section 5 ANNEX A - COVERING CERTIFICATE AND REPORT(S) OF

Annex A.10 Safety gear operated by other means 5.19

Section 6 ANNEX B (INFORMATIVE) - TECHNICAL INFORMATION 6.1

B.5 Suspension system data 6.5

Section 7 ANNEX C - REVIEW COMMITTEE 7.1

Section 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY 8.1

LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020

They do not apply to supplementary testing in support of thorough

A list of organisations represented on the Review Committee can be found at

1.1.1 Competent Person

Further HSE guidance states:

Further HSE simple guidance for lift owners states:

1.1.2 Thorough examination

(a) means a thorough examination by a Competent Person;

and ‘thoroughly examined’ shall be construed accordingly’.4

Note: Regulation 9(3)(a) applies to the periodic thorough examination

Further HSE guidance states:

1.1.3 Functional test

1.1.4 Supplementary tests

'The Competent Person should decide whether or not a load test is

1.2 Purpose of supplementary tests

The supplementary tests themselves are not part of a servicing or

1.3 Aim of guidance on supplementary tests

1.4 Status of guidance

1.5 Relationship between the thorough examination and

Information on how to perform testing of new technologies or components

LG1 Issue 04.1: June 2020

2.2 The law outlined

2.2.1 Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA)

2.2.2 Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999

2.2.3 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

2.2.4 The Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998

PUWER applies to employers in respect of work equipment provided

2.2.5 The Lifting Operations & Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998

Persons in control of non-domestic premises who provide a lift or lifts

Although the example in the ACOP above is of a lift in a shopping

2.3 Duties on lift owners

2.3.1 HSWA particular requirements

Note: ‘Plant’ includes equipment.

2.3.2 Lift owners responsibilities under HSWA s4

2.3.3 PUWER Regulation 5: Requirements for lift maintenance

2.3.4 Lift owners responsibilities for keeping records of reports and

The records of supplementary tests, as part of the report of thorough