Calibration Laboratory Quality Manual: Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Revision: 1 Date: November 2018

Copper Mountain Technologies
Calibration Laboratory
Quality Manual
Document Name: QMS.01:2018

Revision: 1
Date: November 2018
DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD

Revision Date Brief Description of Changes
18-November-2018 The manual cancels and replaces the QMS.01:2015, which has
been technically revised.
Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 2 of 58 Revision: 1


CONTENTS
DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD .................................................................................................. 2
CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................. 4
AUTHORIZATION APPROVALS ................................................................................................. 6
DISTRIBUTION ........................................................................................................................... 6
1 SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................... 7
2 NORMATIVE REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 7
3 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................... 7
4 MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................... 7
4.1 Impartiality ..................................................................................................................................................7
4.2 Confidentiality ............................................................................................................................................8
5 STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. 9
6 RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................ 10
6.1 General ....................................................................................................................................................... 10
6.2 Personnel .................................................................................................................................................. 10
6.3 Facilities and environmental conditions ...................................................................................... 11
6.4 Equipment................................................................................................................................................. 11
6.5 Metrological traceability ..................................................................................................................... 13
6.6 Externally provided products and services .................................................................................. 14
7 PROCESS REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................... 15
7.1 Review of requests, tenders and contracts .................................................................................. 15
7.2 Selection, verification and validation of methods .................................................................... 16
7.3 Sampling.................................................................................................................................................... 17
7.4 Handling of test or calibration items ............................................................................................. 17
7.5 Technical records ................................................................................................................................... 18
7.6 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty ...................................................................................... 18
7.7 Ensuring the validity of results ........................................................................................................ 19
7.8 Reporting of results .............................................................................................................................. 20

7.9 Complaints ................................................................................................................................................ 25

7.10 Nonconforming work ......................................................................................................................... 26
7.11 Control of data and information management ........................................................................ 27
8 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................... 28
8.1 Options ....................................................................................................................................................... 28
8.2 Management system documentation (Option A) ....................................................................... 28
8.3 Control of management system documents (Option A) .......................................................... 29
8.4 Control of records (Option A) ............................................................................................................ 29
8.5 Actions to address risks and opportunities (Option A) ............................................................ 30
8.6 Improvement (Option A)...................................................................................................................... 30
8.7 Corrective actions (Option A) ............................................................................................................ 30
8.8 Internal audits (Option A) ................................................................................................................... 31
8.9 Management reviews (Option A) ...................................................................................................... 31
9 USE OF ACCREDITATION BODY SYMBOL ........................................................................... 33
ANNEX A ORGANIZATION CHART .......................................................................................... 34
ANNEX B PROCESSES INTERACTION CHART ........................................................................ 35
ANNEX C QUALITY POLICY STATEMENT............................................................................... 53
ANNEX D STRUCTURE OF DOCUMENTATION ....................................................................... 56
ANNEX E PERSONNEL COMPETENCE..................................................................................... 57

AUTHORIZATION APPROVALS
Electronic authorization approval is the preferred method for approving quality system
documents. Signed hardcopies are only available upon request.
Approver: Laboratory Head
Approver: Consulting Engineer
Document Reviewer: Quality Manager
Document Owner: Quality Manager
DISTRIBUTION
Printed copies of this document are uncontrolled and users must verify the revision is
current before use. All previous revisions must be discarded. Current documents and revision
index are available on Copper Mountain Technologies network. All documents will have elec-
tronic approval. An uncontrolled copy is available to customers via the Copper Mountain
Technologies website.

1 SCOPE
This Calibration Laboratory Quality Manual defines or identifies the policies, procedures
and requirements for the competence, impartiality and consistent operation that choose to
comply with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 as a calibration laboratory. This document
is applicable to all laboratory activities, regardless of accreditation exists. Any local docu-
ments, procedures and policies associated with ISO/IEC 17025 compliance for calibration
laboratories must comply with this document.
2 NORMATIVE REFERENCES
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this docu-
ment. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest
edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO/IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration la-
boratories
ISO/IEC Guide 99 International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts

and associated terms (VIM, also known as JCGM 200), issued by BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC,
IUPAP and OIML
ISO/IEC Guide 98-4 Uncertainty of measurement – Part 4: Role of measurement uncer-

tainty in conformity assessment (also known as JCGM 106), issued by BIPM, IEC, IFCC, I L A C ,
ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML
EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 12 Guidelines on the Evaluation of Vector Network Ana-
lyzers (VNA)
3 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this document, the relevant terms and definitions given in VIM apply.
4 MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Impartiality
4.1.1 Laboratory activities are undertaken impartially and structured and managed so as
to safeguard impartiality.

4.1.2 The laboratory management is committed to impartiality.
4.1.3 The laboratory is responsible for the impartiality of its laboratory activities and
does not allow commercial, financial or other pressures to compromise impartiality.
4.1.4 The laboratory identifies risks to its impartiality on an on-going basis. This includes
those risks that arise from its activities, or from its relationships, or from the relationships
of its personnel. However, such relationships do not necessarily present a laboratory with a
risk to impartiality.
4.1.5 If a risk to impartiality is identified, the laboratory is able to demonstrate how it

eliminates or minimizes such risk.
4.2 Confidentiality
4.2.1 The laboratory is responsible, through legally enforceable commitments, for the
management of all information obtained or created during the performance of laboratory
activities. The laboratory informs the customer in advance, of the information it intends to
place in the public domain. Except for information that the customer makes publicly availa-
ble, or when agreed between the laboratory and the customer (e.g. for the purpose of re-
sponding to complaints), all other information is considered proprietary information and is
regarded as confidential.
4.2.2 When the laboratory is required by law or authorized by contractual arrange-

ments to release confidential information, the customer or individual concerned is, unless
prohibited by law, notified of the information provided.
4.2.3 Information about the customer obtained from sources other than the customer (e.g.
complainant, regulators) is confidential between the customer and the laboratory. The pro-
vider (source) of this information is confidential to the laboratory and is not be shared
with the customer, unless agreed by the source.
4.2.4 Personnel, including any committee members, contractors, personnel of external

bodies, or individuals acting on the laboratory's behalf, keep confidential all information ob-
tained or created during the performance of laboratory activities, except as required by law.

5 STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS
5.1 The laboratory is a defined part of Copper Mountain Technologies that is legally re-
sponsible for its laboratory activities.
5.2 The laboratory has identified management that has overall responsibility for the la-
boratory (annex A).
5.3 The laboratory has defined and documented the range of laboratory activities for
which it conforms with this document. Copper Mountain Technologies laboratory performs
calibration activities. The laboratory only claims conformity with this document for this
range of laboratory activities, which excludes externally provided laboratory activities on an
ongoing basis. Laboratory whose work includes both accredited and non-accredited calibra-
tions complies to this document, but non-accredited calibrations are not required to fully
comply with sections 6.5, 7.6 and reporting requirements of 7.8.
5.4 Laboratory activities are carried out in such a way as to meet the requirements
of this document, the laboratory’s customers, regulatory authorities and organizations
providing recognition. This includes laboratory activities performed in its permanent facili-
ties.
5.5 The laboratory has (annex B):

a) defined the organization and management structure of the laboratory, its place in
parent organization (see also annex A), and the relationships between management, technical
operations and support services. The structure is described to a level of detail sufficient to
identify key personnel / activities and in order to reveal possible conflicts of interest involving
both calibration services and manufacturing activities involving calibration;
b) specified the responsibility, authority and interrelationship of all personnel who man-
age, perform or verify work affecting the results of laboratory activities;
c) documented its procedures to the extent necessary to ensure the consistent applica-
tion of its laboratory activities and the validity of the results.
5.6 The laboratory has personnel named as a quality manager who, irrespective of other
responsibilities, have the authority and resources needed to carry out their duties, including:
a) implementation, maintenance and improvement of the management system;
b) identification of deviations from the management system or from the procedures
for performing laboratory activities;
c) initiation of actions to prevent or minimize such deviations;

d) reporting to laboratory management on the performance of the management system

and any need for improvement;
e) ensuring the effectiveness of laboratory activities.
NOTE Individuals may be assigned more than one function and it may be impractical to
appoint deputes for every function.
5.7 Laboratory management ensures that:

a) communication takes place regarding the effectiveness of the management system
and the importance of meeting customers’ and other requirements;
b) the integrity of the management system is maintained when changes to the manage-
ment system are planned and implemented.
6 RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
6.1 General
The laboratory has available the personnel, facilities, equipment, systems and support
services necessary to manage and perform its laboratory activities.
6.2 Personnel
6.2.1 All personnel of the laboratory, either internal or external, that could influence
the laboratory activities act impartially, are competent and work in accordance with the la-
boratory's management system.
6.2.2 The laboratory documents the competence requirements for each function influ-
encing the results of laboratory activities, including requirements for education, qualifica-
tion, training, technical knowledge, skills and experience.
6.2.3 The laboratory ensures that the personnel have the competence to perform
laboratory activities for which they are responsible and to evaluate the significance of devia-
tions.
6.2.4 The management of the laboratory communicates to personnel their duties, re-
sponsibilities and authorities.
6.2.5 The laboratory has procedure (s) and retains records for:
a) determining the competence requirements;
b) selection of personnel;
c) training of personnel;

d) supervision of personnel;
e) authorization of personnel;
f) monitoring competence of personnel.
6.2.6 The laboratory authorizes personnel to perform specific laboratory activities, in-
cluding but not limited to, the following:
a) development, modification, verification and validation of methods;
b) analysis of results, including statements of conformity or opinions and interpreta-
tions;
c) report, review and authorization of results.
6.3 Facilities and environmental conditions
6.3.1 The facilities and environmental conditions are suitable for the laboratory activ-
ities and not adversely affect the validity of results.
6.3.2 The requirements for facilities and environmental conditions necessary for the
performance of the laboratory activities are documented.
6.3.3 The laboratory monitors, controls and records environmental conditions in ac-
cordance with relevant specifications, methods or procedures or where they influence the va-
lidity of the results.
6.3.4 Measures to control facilities are implemented, monitored and periodically re-
viewed and include, but not be limited to:
a) access to and use of areas affecting laboratory activities;
b) prevention of contamination, interference or adverse influences on laboratory activi-
ties;
c) effective separation between areas with incompatible laboratory activities.
6.3.5 When the laboratory performs laboratory activities at sites or facilities outside
its permanent control, it ensures that the requirements related to facilities and environmen-
tal conditions of this document are met.
6.4 Equipment
6.4.1 The laboratory has access to equipment (including, but not limited to, measuring
instruments, software, measurement standards, reference materials, reference data, reagents,
consumables or auxiliary apparatus) that is required for the correct performance of laboratory

activities and that can influence the results.
6.4.2 When the laboratory uses equipment outside its permanent control, it ensures
that the requirements for equipment of this document are met.
6.4.3 The laboratory has a procedure for handling, transport, storage, use and planned
maintenance of equipment in order to ensure proper functioning and to prevent contamina-
tion or deterioration.
6.4.4 The laboratory verifies that equipment conforms to specified requirements be-
fore being placed or returned into service.
6.4.5 The equipment used for measurement is capable of achieving the measurement
accuracy and/or measurement uncertainty required to provide a valid result.
6.4.6 Measuring equipment is calibrated when:

− the measurement accuracy or measurement uncertainty affects the validity of the re-
ported results, and/or
− calibration of the equipment is required to establish the metrological traceability of
the reported results.
6.4.7 The laboratory establishes a calibration program, which is reviewed and adjusted
as necessary in order to maintain confidence in the status of calibration.
6.4.8 All equipment requiring calibration or which has a defined period of validity is
labelled, coded or otherwise identified to allow the user of the equipment to readily identify
the status of calibration or period of validity.
a) Laboratory has a procedure stating its policy for establishing and changing calibration
intervals for equipment that it controls.
6.4.9 Equipment that has been subjected to overloading or mishandling, gives question-
able results, or has been shown to be defective or outside specified requirements, is taken out
of service. It is isolated to prevent its use or clearly labelled or marked as being out of service
until it has been verified to perform correctly. The laboratory examines the effect of the de-
fect or deviation from specified requirements and initiates the management of nonconform-
ing work procedure (see 7.10).
6.4.10 When intermediate checks are necessary to maintain confidence in the per-
formance of the equipment, these checks are carried out according to a procedure.

6.4.11 When calibration and reference material data include reference values or correc-
tion factors, the laboratory ensures the reference values and correction factors are updated
and implemented, as appropriate, to meet specified requirements.
6.4.12 The laboratory takes practicable measures to prevent unintended adjustments of

equipment from invalidating results.
6.4.13 Records are retained for equipment which can influence laboratory activities.
The records include the following, where applicable:
a) the identity of equipment, including software and firmware version;
b) the manufacturer's name, type identification, and serial number or other unique iden-
tification;
c) evidence of verification that equipment conforms with specified requirements;
d) the current location. Copper Mountain Technologies use only one location for all cali-
bration activities, thus, as a current location the laboratory is considered (RCD.020 Accommo-
dation data list);
e) calibration dates, results of calibrations, adjustments, acceptance criteria, and the
due date of the next calibration or the calibration interval;
f) documentation of reference materials, results, acceptance criteria, relevant dates and
the period of validity; Copper Mountain Technologies do not use reference material in its
laboratory activities, thus, section 6.4.13 f) is not applicable.
g) the maintenance plan and maintenance carried out to date, where relevant to the
performance of the equipment;
h) details of any damage, malfunction, modification to, or repair of, the equipment.
6.5 Metrological traceability
6.5.1 The laboratory establishes and maintains metrological traceability of its meas-
urement results by means of a documented unbroken chain of calibrations, each contributing
to the measurement uncertainty, linking them to an appropriate reference.
6.5.2 The laboratory ensures that measurement results are traceable to the Internation-
al System of Units (SI) through:
a) calibration provided by a competent laboratory; or
b) certified values of certified reference materials provided by a competent producer
with stated metrological traceability to the SI; (Copper Mountain Technologies do not use
reference material in its laboratory activities, thus, section 6.5.2 b) is not applicable) or

c) direct realization of the SI units ensured by comparison, directly or indirectly, with

national or international standards.
6.5.3 When metrological traceability to the SI units is not technically possible, the
laboratory demonstrates metrological traceability to an appropriate reference, e.g.:
a) certified values of certified reference materials provided by a competent producer.
Copper Mountain Technologies do not use reference material in its laboratory activities,
thus, section 6.5.3 a) is not applicable;
b) results of reference measurement procedures, specified methods or consensus
standards that are clearly described and accepted as providing measurement results fit for
their intended use and ensured by suitable comparison.
6.6 Externally provided products and services
6.6.1 The laboratory ensures that only suitable externally provided products and ser-
vices that affect laboratory activities are used, when such products and services:
a) are intended for incorporation into the laboratory’s own activities;
b) are provided, in part or in full, directly to the customer by the laboratory, as re-
ceived from the external provider;
c) are used to support the operation of the laboratory.
6.6.2 The laboratory has a procedure and retains records for:

a) defining, reviewing and approving the laboratory’s requirements for externally pro-
vided products and services;
b) defining the criteria for evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance and re-
evaluation of the external providers (annex B.5);
c) ensuring that externally provided products and services conform to the laboratory’s
established requirements, or when applicable, to the relevant requirements of this docu-
ment, before they are used or directly provided to the customer;
d) taking any actions arising from evaluations, monitoring of performance and re-
evaluations of the external providers.
6.6.3 The laboratory communicates its requirements to external providers for:

a) the products and services to be provided;
b) the acceptance criteria;
c) competence, including any required qualification of personnel;
d) activities that the laboratory, or its customer, intends to perform at the external pro-
vider's premises.

6.6.4 When a laboratory subcontracts any part of the calibration, this work is placed with
a laboratory complying with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 and (or) ANSI/NCSL Z540-1.
The laboratory ensures and is able to demonstrate that its subcontractor is competent to per-
form the activities in question and complies with the same criteria of competence as the la-
boratory with respect to the work being sub-contracted. The laboratory advises the customer
of its intention to subcontract any portion of the calibration to another party.
7 PROCESS REQUIREMENTS
7.1 Review of requests, tenders and contracts
7.1.1 The laboratory has a procedure for the review of requests, tenders and con-
tracts. The procedure ensures that:
a) the requirements are adequately defined, documented and understood;
b) the laboratory has the capability and resources to meet the requirements;
c) where external providers are used, the requirements of 6.6 are applied and the labor-
atory advises the customer of the specific laboratory activities to be performed by the ex-
ternal provider and gains the customer's approval;
d) the appropriate methods or procedures are selected and are capable of meeting
the customers' requirements.
7.1.2 The laboratory informs the customer when the method requested by the customer
is considered to be inappropriate or out of date.
7.1.3 When the customer requests a statement of conformity to a specification or

standard for calibration (e.g. pass/fail, in-tolerance/out-of-tolerance), the specification or
standard and the decision rule are clearly defined. Unless inherent in the requested specifi-
cation or standard, the decision rule selected is communicated to, and agreed with, the cus-
tomer.
7.1.4 Any differences between the request or tender and the contract are resolved be-
fore laboratory activities commence. Each contract is acceptable both to the laboratory and
the customer. Deviations requested by the customer are not impact the integrity of the la-
boratory or the validity of the results.
7.1.5 The customer is informed of any deviation from the contract.
7.1.6 If a contract is amended after work has commenced, the contract review is re-

peated and any amendments are communicated to all affected personnel.
7.1.7 The laboratory cooperates with customers or their representatives in clarifying

the customer's request and in monitoring the laboratory’s performance in relation to the work
performed.
7.1.8 Records of reviews, including any significant changes, are retained. Records also
are retained of pertinent discussions with a customer relating to the customer's requirements
or the results of the laboratory activities.
7.2 Selection, verification and validation of methods
7.2.1 Selection and verification of methods
7.2.1.1 The laboratory uses appropriate methods and procedures for all laboratory activ-
ities and, where appropriate, for evaluation of the measurement uncertainty as well as statis-
tical techniques for analysis of data.
7.2.1.2 All methods, procedures and supporting documentation, such as instructions,

standards, manuals and reference data relevant to the laboratory activities, are kept up to
date and are made readily available to personnel (see 8.3).
7.2.1.3 The laboratory ensures that it uses the latest valid version of a method unless
it is not appropriate or possible to do so. When necessary, the application of the method is
supplemented with additional details to ensure consistent application.
7.2.1.4 When the customer does not specify the method to be used, the laboratory
selects an appropriate method and informs the customer of the method chosen. Methods
published either in international, regional or national standards, or by reputable technical
organizations, or in relevant scientific texts or journals, or as specified by the manufacturer
of the equipment, are recommended. Laboratory-developed or modified methods can also be
used.
7.2.1.5 The laboratory verifies that it can properly perform methods before introducing
them by ensuring that it can achieve the required performance. Records of the verification are
retained. If the method is revised by the issuing body, verification is repeated to the extent
necessary.
7.2.1.6 When method development is required, this is a planned activity and is assigned
to competent personnel equipped with adequate resources. As method development pro-

ceeds, periodic review is carried out to confirm that the needs of the customer are still being
fulfilled. Any modifications to the development plan is approved and authorized.
7.2.1.7 Deviations from methods for all laboratory activities occur only if the deviation
has been documented, technically justified, authorized, and accepted by the customer.
7.2.2 Validation of methods
7.2.2.1 The laboratory validates non-standard methods, laboratory-developed methods

and standard methods used outside their intended scope or otherwise modified. The valida-
tion is as extensive as is necessary to meet the needs of the given application or field of ap-
plication.
7.2.2.2 When changes are made to a validated method, the influence of such changes
is determined and where they are found to affect the original validation, a new method vali-
dation is performed.
7.2.2.3 The performance characteristics of validated methods, as assessed for the in-
tended use, is relevant to the customers' needs and consistent with specified requirements.
7.2.2.4 The laboratory retains the following records of validation:

a) the validation procedure used;
b) specification of the requirements;
c) determination of the performance characteristics of the method;
d) results obtained;
e) a statement on the validity of the method, detailing its fitness for the intended use.
7.3 Sampling
Copper Mountain Technologies accredited measurement facilities do not sample. Thus,
section 7.3 of ISO/IEC 17025 is not applicable.
7.4 Handling of calibration items
7.4.1 The laboratory has a procedure for the transportation, receipt, handling, protec-
tion, storage, retention, and disposal or return of calibration items, including all provisions
necessary to protect the integrity of the calibration item, and to protect the interests of the
laboratory and the customer. Precautions are taken to avoid deterioration, contamination,
loss or damage to the item during handling, transporting, storing/waiting, and preparation for
calibration. Handling instructions provided with the item are followed.

7.4.2 The laboratory has a system for the unambiguous identification of calibration
items. The identification is retained while the item is under the responsibility of the labor-
atory. The system ensures that items will not be confused physically or when referred to
in records or other documents. The system, if appropriate, accommodates a sub-division of
an item or groups of items and the transfer of items.
7.4.3 Upon receipt of the calibration item, deviations from specified conditions are rec-
orded. When there is doubt about the suitability of an item for calibration, when anti-
tamper seals are present but broken, or when an item does not conform to the description
provided, the laboratory consults the customer for further instructions before proceeding
and records the results of this consultation. When the customer requires the item to be
calibrated acknowledging a deviation from specified conditions, the laboratory includes a dis-
claimer in the report indicating which results may be affected by the deviation.
7.4.4 When items need to be stored or conditioned under specified environmental

conditions, these conditions are maintained, monitored and recorded.
7.5 Technical records
7.5.1 The laboratory ensures that technical records for each laboratory activity contain
the results, report and sufficient information to facilitate, if possible, identification of factors
affecting the measurement result and its associated measurement uncertainty and enable
the repetition of the laboratory activity under conditions as close as possible to the orig-
inal. The technical records include the date and the identity of personnel responsible for
each laboratory activity and for checking data and results. Original observations, data and
calculations are recorded at the time they are made and are identifiable with the specific task.
7.5.2 The laboratory ensures that amendments to technical records can be tracked to
previous versions or to original observations. Both the original and amended data and
files are retained, including the date of alteration, an indication of the altered aspects and the
personnel responsible for the alterations.
7.6 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty
7.6.1 Laboratory identifies the contributions to measurement uncertainty. When evaluat-

ing measurement uncertainty, all contributions that are of significance, including those aris-
ing from sampling, are taken into account using appropriate methods of analysis.
7.6.2 A laboratory performing calibrations, including of its own equipment, evaluates

the measurement uncertainty for all calibrations.
7.6.3 Copper Mountain Technologies has accredited measurements facilities to perform

a calibration. Testing is not performed under accreditation. Thus, section 7.6.3 of
ISO/IEC 17025 is not applicable.
7.7 Ensuring the validity of results
7.7.1 The laboratory has a procedure for monitoring the validity of results. The result-
ing data are recorded in such a way that trends are detectable and, where practicable, statis-
tical techniques are applied to review the results. This monitoring is planned and reviewed
and includes, where appropriate, but not be limited to:
a) use of reference materials or quality control materials. Copper Mountain Technolo-
gies do not use reference material in its laboratory activities, thus, section 7.1.1 a) is not
applicable;
b) use of alternative instrumentation that has been calibrated to provide traceable re-
sults;
c) functional check(s) of measuring and testing equipment;
d) use of check or working standards with control charts, where applicable;
e) intermediate checks on measuring equipment;
f) replicate calibrations using the same or different methods;
g) recalibration of retained items;
h) correlation of results for different characteristics of an item;
i) review of reported results;
j) intralaboratory comparisons;
k) testing of blind sample(s).
7.7.2 The laboratory monitors its performance by comparison with results of other la-
boratories, where available and appropriate. This monitoring are planned and reviewed and
includes, but not be limited to, either or both of the following:
a) participation in proficiency testing;
b) participation in interlaboratory comparisons other than proficiency testing.
7.7.3 Data from monitoring activities are analyzed, used to control and, if applicable,
improve the laboratory's activities. If the results of the analysis of data from monitoring
activities are found to be outside pre-defined criteria, appropriate action are taken to pre-
vent incorrect results from being reported..

NOTE Laboratory develops schedule for monitoring the validity of results – technical
record that would reflect key planned measurement events according to the scope of accredi-
tation, data to be kept, appropriate methods, evaluation analysis with predefined criteria.
According to the schedule, during equipment lifetime, monitoring the obtained meas-
urement result trends is performed in purpose of:
- identification of possible deterioration or aging of a standard;
- making decision for initial adjustment of a standard;
- making decision for replacing or repairing of a standard, or purchasing another one;
- making decision to upgrade a standard;
- making decision for using automation programs or techniques for more effective oper-
ations with a standard (where applicable);
- making decision to change monitoring interval in case of a doubt;
- making decision to appoint actions to prevent incorrect results in case of data are close
to pre-defined criteria;
- making decision to correct the scope of accreditation.
For collecting and analysis of the measurement results, one should adhere to methods
given in this section. The most important of them are proficiency testing activity as a part of
interlaboratory comparison, intermediate check, reviewing and investigation of reported re-
sults, comparison analysis of measurements obtained with the same type equipment.
It is also recommended to use statistical software for treatment of the results.
Laboratory carries out corrective actions (in accordance with 8.7) if the results of the
analysis of data from monitoring activities are found to be outside pre-defined criteria.
Results of the analysis are considered into management reviews.
7.8 Reporting of results
7.8.1 General
7.8.1.1 The results are reviewed and authorized prior to release.

7.8.1.2 The results are provided accurately, clearly, unambiguously and objectively,
usually in a report (e.g. calibration certificate), and include all the information agreed with
the customer and necessary for the interpretation of the results and all information required
by the method used. All issued reports are retained as technical records.
7.8.1.3 When agreed with the customer, the results may be reported in a simplified way.
Any information listed in 7.8.2 to 7.8.7 that is not reported to the customer are readily availa-
ble.
7.8.2 Common requirements for reports
7.8.2.1 Each report includes at least the following information, unless the laboratory
has valid reasons for not doing so, thereby minimizing any possibility of misunderstanding or
misuse:
a) a title (e.g. “Calibration Certificate”);
b) the name and address of the laboratory;
c) the location of performance of the laboratory activities, including when performed
at a customer facility or at sites away from the laboratory’s permanent facilities, or in asso-
ciated temporary or mobile facilities;
d) unique identification that all its components are recognized as a portion of a com-
plete report and a clear identification of the end;
e) the name and contact information of the customer;
f) identification of the method used;
g) a description, unambiguous identification, and, when necessary, the condition of the
item;
h) the date of receipt of the calibration item(s), where this is critical to the validity and
application of the results;
i) the date(s) of performance of the laboratory activity;
j) the date of issue of the report;
k) reference to the sampling plan and sampling method used by the laboratory or other
bodies where these are relevant to the validity or application of the results;
l) a statement to the effect that the results relate only to the items tested, calibrated or
sampled;
m) the results with, where appropriate, the units of measurement;
n) additions to, deviations, or exclusions from the method;
o) identification of the person(s) authorizing the report;
p) clear identification when results are from external providers;

q) a statement, that the calibration certificate shall not be reproduced except in full,
without written approval of the laboratory.
7.8.2.2 The laboratory is responsible for all the information provided in the report, ex-
cept when information is provided by the customer. Data provided by a customer are
clearly identified. In addition, a disclaimer is put on the report when the information is sup-
plied by the customer and can affect the validity of results. Where the laboratory has not
been responsible for the sampling stage (e.g. the sample has been provided by the custom-
er), it states in the report that the results apply to the sample as received.
7.8.3 Specific requirements for test reports

All accredited Copper Mountain Technologies measurement facilities perform calibra-
tions and issue calibration certificates. Thus, section 7.8.3 of ISO/IEC 17025 dealing with
Test Reports is not applicable.
7.8.4 Specific requirements for calibration certificates
7.8.4.1 In addition to the requirements listed in 7.8.2, calibration certificates include

the following:
a) the measurement uncertainty of the measurement result presented in the same unit
as that of the measurand or in a term relative to the measurand (e.g. percent);
b) the conditions (e.g. environmental) under which the calibrations were made that have
an influence on the measurement results;
c) a statement identifying how the measurements are metrologically traceable;
d) the results before and after any adjustment or repair, if available. Certificates or re-
ports designate any special limitations of use;
e) where relevant, a statement of conformity with requirements or specifications (see
7.8.6);
f) where appropriate, opinions and interpretations (see 7.8.7);
g) the following or a similar statement on its issued certificates: “Reported uncertainties
(where applicable) represent expanded uncertainties expressed at approximately the 95%
confidence level using a coverage factor of 2 (k=2)”;
h) the measurement uncertainty unless it has been established and documented during
contract review that only a statement of compliance to a specification is required by the cus-
tomer;
i) when a customer requests only a statement of compliance without data and measure-
ment uncertainty (as evidenced in contract review records), contract review records indicate

the customer was notified that the calibration is not intended to be used in support of further
dissemination of metrological traceability (i.e., to calibrate another device);
j) at specific customer request (as documented in contract review records), the laboratory
may issue a statement of compliance without taking the measurement uncertainty into con-
sideration. In this case, are the results and measurement uncertainty included in the calibra-
tion certificate and is the following statement included in the certificate: “The statement of
compliance in this certificate was issued without taking the uncertainty of measurement into
consideration. The customer shall assess the results and uncertainty when determining if the
results meet their needs.” This is considered “shared responsibility”;
k) the laboratory maintain records of measurement uncertainty for all accredited calibra-
tions;
l) the uncertainties reported to, at most, two significant digits, where feasible;
m) the laboratory ensures it does not report a smaller uncertainty of measurement on its
issued accredited certificates than the CMC on the scope of accreditation.
7.8.4.2 Where the laboratory is responsible for the sampling activity, calibration certifi-
cates meet the requirements listed in 7.8.5 where necessary for the interpretation of calibra-
tion results.
7.8.4.3 A calibration certificate or calibration label does not contain any recommen-
dation on the calibration interval, except where this has been agreed with the customer.
7.8.5 Reporting sampling – specific requirements

All accredited Copper Mountain Technologies measurement facilities perform calibra-
tions and issue calibration certificates. Thus, section 7.8.5 of ISO/IEC 17025 dealing with
Sampling Report is not applicable.
7.8.6 Reporting statements of conformity
7.8.6.1 When a statement of conformity to a specification or standard is provided, the

laboratory documents the decision rule employed, taking into account the level of risk (such
as false accept and false reject and statistical assumptions) associated with the decision rule
employed, and apply the decision rule.
NOTE Where the decision rule is prescribed by the customer, regulations or normative
documents, a further consideration of the level of risk is not necessary.
7.8.6.2 The laboratory reports on the statement of conformity, such that the state-
ment clearly identifies:

a) to which results the statement of conformity applies;

b) which specifications, standards or parts thereof are met or not met;
c) the decision rule applied (unless it is inherent in the requested specification or stand-
ard).
NOTE When reporting statements of conformity, laboratory has chosen the next ap-
proach for defining a decision rule based on ISO/IEC Guide 98-4 and EURAMET Calibration
Guide No. 12.
Two main cases should be considered:
- Statement of conformity applies to parameters which are covered by the scope of ac-
creditation, and laboratory establishes a sequence of uncertainty calculation for them (for
more details refer to traceability guide).
EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 12 (Annex E) prescribes decision rule and way of uncer-
tainty accounting for S-parameters in accordance with scalar case of quantitative verification
criteria. S-parameters are named into the scope as “Reflection Magnitude”, “Reflection Phase”,
“Transmission Magnitude”, and “Transmission Phase”.
For other parameters into the scope such as “RF Absolute Power - Measure” and “Fre-
quency” the decision rule is “simple acceptance” described into the ISO/IEC Guide 98-4 (refer
to 8.2) and based on TUR of 3:1 or best. Under such a rule, the producer and user (consumer)
of the measurement result agree to accept as conforming (and reject otherwise) an item
whose property has a measured value in the tolerance interval.
- Statement of conformity applies to parameters which are not included into the scope
of accreditation. The unaccredited material, where applicable, is indicated by an asterisk ( * )
or confined to clearly marked sections. Uncertainty of such measurements is not calculated
and cannot be taken into account. Thus, a measured value is accepted as pass decision if it is
in the tolerance interval and rejected as fail decision when it is out of the tolerance.
7.8.7 Reporting opinions and interpretations
7.8.7.1 When opinions and interpretations are expressed, the laboratory ensures that
only personnel authorized for the expression of opinions and interpretations release the re-
spective statement. The laboratory documents the basis upon which the opinions and inter-
pretations have been made.
7.8.7.2 The opinions and interpretations expressed in reports are based on the results

obtained from the calibrated item and are clearly identified as such.
7.8.7.3 When opinions and interpretations are directly communicated by dialogue with
the customer, a record of the dialogue is retained.
7.8.8 Amendments to reports
7.8.8.1 When an issued report needs to be changed, amended or re-issued, any change
of information is clearly identified and, where appropriate, the reason for the change included
in the report.
7.8.8.2 Amendments to a report after issue are made only in the form of a further
document, or data transfer, which includes the statement “Supplement to Calibration Certifi-
cate, serial number... [or as otherwise identified]”, or an equivalent form of wording.
Such amendments shall meet all the requirements of this document.
7.8.8.3 When it is necessary to issue a complete new report, this is uniquely identified
and contains a reference to the original that it replaces.
7.8.8.4 If any event, such as the identification of defective laboratory calibration equip-
ment, casts doubt on the validity of results given in any prior calibration report or certificate
or amendment to a report or certificate, the calibration laboratory notify the customer
promptly in writing. Such notification quantifies the magnitude of error created in the calibra-
tion results. The customer promptly notified when any customer's measuring and test equip-
ment is found significantly out of tolerance during the calibration/verification process. Meas-
urement data reported so that appropriate action can be taken.
7.9 Complaints
7.9.1 The laboratory has a documented process to receive, evaluate and make deci-
sions on complaints. Where applicable, complaints are promptly resolved.
7.9.2 A description of the handling process for complaints is available to any interest-
ed party on request. Upon receipt of a complaint, the laboratory confirms whether the
complaint relates to laboratory activities that it is responsible for and, if so, deal with it.
The laboratory is responsible for all decisions at all levels of the handling process for com-
plaints.
7.9.3 The process for handling complaints includes at least the following elements and

methods:
a) description of the process for receiving, validating, investigating the complaint, and
deciding what actions are to be taken in response to it;
b) tracking and recording complaints, including actions undertaken to resolve them;
c) ensuring that any appropriate action is taken.
7.9.4 The laboratory receiving the complaint is responsible for gathering and verifying
all necessary information to validate the complaint.
7.9.5 Whenever possible, the laboratory acknowledges receipt of the complaint, and
provides the complainant with progress reports and the outcome.
7.9.6 The outcomes to be communicated to the complainant are made by, or reviewed
and approved by, individual(s) not involved in the original laboratory activities in question.
7.9.7 Whenever possible, the laboratory gives formal notice of the end of the complaint
handling to the complainant.
7.10 Nonconforming work
7.10.1 The laboratory has a procedure that is implemented when any aspect of its labora-
tory activities or results of this work do not conform to its own procedures or the agreed re-
quirements of the customer (e.g. equipment or environmental conditions are out of specified
limits, results of monitoring fail to meet specified criteria). Out of tolerance calibration
standards are considered to be nonconforming calibration work. The procedure ensures that:
a) the responsibilities and authorities for the management of nonconforming work are
defined;
b) actions (including halting or repeating of work and withholding of reports, as neces-
sary) are based upon the risk levels established by the laboratory;
c) an evaluation is made of the significance of the nonconforming work, including an
impact analysis on previous results;
d) a decision is taken on the acceptability of the nonconforming work;
e) where necessary, the customer is notified and work is recalled;
f) the responsibility for authorizing the resumption of work is defined.
7.10.2 The laboratory retains records of nonconforming work and actions as specified
in 7 .10 .1 , bullets b) to f).
7.10.3 Where the evaluation indicates that the nonconforming work could recur, or that

there is doubt about the conformity of the laboratory's operations with its own manage-
ment system, the laboratory implements corrective action.
7.11 Control of data and information management
7.11.1 The laboratory has access to the data and information needed to perform la-
boratory activities.
7.11.2 The laboratory information management system used for the collection, pro-
cessing, recording, reporting, storage or retrieval of data are validated for functionality, in-
cluding the proper functioning of interfaces within the laboratory information management
system by the laboratory before introduction. Whenever there are any changes, including
laboratory software configuration or modifications to commercial off-the-shelf software,
they are authorized, documented and validated before implementation.
NOTE 1 In this document “laboratory information management system(s)” includes the
management of data and information contained in both computerized and non-computerized
systems. Some of the requirements can be more applicable to computerized systems than to
non-computerized systems.
NOTE 2 Commercial off-the-shelf software in general use within its designed application
range can be considered to be sufficiently validated.
7.11.3 The laboratory information management system:

a) is protected from unauthorized access;
b) is safeguarded against tampering and loss;
c) is operated in an environment that complies with provider or laboratory specifica-
tions or, in the case of non-computerized systems, provides conditions which safeguard the
accuracy of manual recording and transcription;
d) is maintained in a manner that ensures the integrity of the data and information;
e) includes recording system failures and the appropriate immediate and corrective ac-
tions.
7.11.4 When a laboratory information management system is managed and main-

tained off-site or through an external provider, the laboratory ensures that the provider or
operator of the system complies with all applicable requirements of this document.
7.11.5 The laboratory ensures that instructions, manuals and reference data relevant to
the laboratory information management system are made readily available to personnel.

7.11.6 Calculations and data transfers are checked in an appropriate and systematic
manner.
8 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
8.1 Options
8.1.1 General
The laboratory establishes, documents, implements and maintains a management system
that is capable of supporting and demonstrating the consistent achievement of the require-
ments of this document and assuring the quality of the laboratory results. In addition to meet-
ing the requirements of Clauses 4 to 7, the laboratory implements a management system in
accordance with Option A.
8.1.2 Option A
The management system of the laboratory address the following:
− management system documentation (see 8.2);

− control of management system documents (see 8.3);
− control of records (see 8.4);
− actions to address risks and opportunities (see 8.5);
− improvement (see 8.6);
− corrective actions (see 8.7);
− internal audits (see 8.8);
− management reviews (see 8.9).
8.1.3 Option B
Copper Mountain Technologies have chosen Option A. Thus, section 8.1.3 of
ISO/IEC 17025 is not applicable.
8.2 Management system documentation (Option A)
8.2.1 Laboratory management, under the direction of top management, establish, doc-
ument, and maintain policies and objectives for the fulfilment of the purposes of this
document and ensure that the policies and objectives are acknowledged and implemented
at all levels of the laboratory organization (annex C).
8.2.2 The policies and objectives address the competence, impartiality and consistent
operation of the laboratory.

8.2.3 Laboratory management provide evidence of commitment to the development

and implementation of the management system and to continually improving its effective-
ness. The laboratory management, under the direction of top management, ensures the integ-
rity of the management system when changes are planned or implemented to the laboratory
management system.
8.2.4 All documentation, processes, systems, records, related to the fulfilment of the
requirements of this document are included in, referenced from, or linked to the management
system (annex D).
8.2.5 All personnel involved in laboratory activities have access to the parts of the
management system documentation and related information that are applicable to their re-
sponsibilities (annex E).
8.3 Control of management system documents (Option A)
8.3.1 The laboratory controls the documents (internal and external) that relate to the ful-
filment of this document.
8.3.2 The laboratory ensures that:

a) documents are approved for adequacy prior to issue by authorized personnel;
b) documents are periodically reviewed, and updated as necessary;
c) changes and the current revision status of documents are identified;
d) relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use and, where
necessary, their distribution is controlled;
e) documents are uniquely identified;
f) the unintended use of obsolete documents is prevented, and suitable identification
is applied to them if they are retained for any purpose.
8.4 Control of records (Option A)
8.4.1 The laboratory establishes and retains legible records to demonstrate fulfilment of
the requirements in this document.
8.4.2 The laboratory implements the controls needed for the identification, storage,
protection, back-up, archive, retrieval, retention time, and disposal of its records. The laborato-
ry retains records for a period consistent with its contractual obligations. Access to these
records are consistent with the confidentiality commitments, and records are readily availa-
ble.

8.5 Actions to address risks and opportunities (Option A)
8.5.1 The laboratory considers the risks and opportunities associated with the laboratory
activities in order to:
a) give assurance that the management system achieves its intended results;
b) enhance opportunities to achieve the purpose and objectives of the laboratory;
c) prevent, or reduce, undesired impacts and potential failures in the laboratory activi-
ties;
d) achieve improvement.
8.5.2 The laboratory plans:

a) actions to address these risks and opportunities;
b) how to:
− integrate and implement these actions into its management system;
− evaluate the effectiveness of these actions.
8.5.3 Actions taken to address risks and opportunities are proportional to the potential
impact on the validity of laboratory results.
8.6 Improvement (Option A)
8.6.1 The laboratory identifies and selects opportunities for improvement and imple-
ments any necessary actions.
8.6.2 The laboratory seeks feedback, both positive and negative, from its customers. The
feedback is analyzed and used to improve the management system, laboratory activities
and customer service.
8.7 Corrective actions (Option A)
8.7.1 When a nonconformity occurs, the laboratory:

a) reacts to the nonconformity and, as applicable:
− takes action to control and corrects it;
− addresses the consequences;
b) evaluates the need for action to eliminate the cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order
that it does not recur or occur elsewhere, by:
− reviewing and analyzing the nonconformity;
− determining the causes of the nonconformity;
− determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur;

c) implements any action needed;

d) reviews the effectiveness of any corrective action taken;
e) updates risks and opportunities determined during planning, if necessary;
f) makes changes to the management system, if necessary.
8.7.2 Corrective actions are appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities encoun-
tered.
8.7.3 The laboratory retains records as evidence of:

a) the nature of the nonconformities, cause(s) and any subsequent actions taken;
b) the results of any corrective action.
8.8 Internal audits (Option A)
8.8.1 The laboratory conducts internal audits at planned intervals to provide infor-
mation on whether the management system:
a) conforms to:
− the laboratory’s own requirements for its management system, including the labora-
tory activities;
− the requirements of this document;
b) is effectively implemented and maintained.
The cycle for internal audit will be completed annually.
8.8.2 The laboratory:

a) plans, establishes, implements and maintains an audit program including the fre-
quency, methods, responsibilities, planning requirements and reporting, which is taken
into consideration the importance of the laboratory activities concerned, changes affecting
the laboratory, and the results of previous audits;
b) defines the audit criteria and scope for each audit;
c) ensures that the results of the audits are reported to relevant management;
d) implements appropriate correction and corrective actions without undue delay;
e) retains records as evidence of the implementation of the audit program and the audit
results.
8.9 Management reviews (Option A)
8.9.1 The laboratory management reviews its management system at planned intervals,
in order to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness, including the stated
policies and objectives related to the fulfilment of this document. The management review is

conducted at a minimum annually.
8.9.2 The inputs to management review are recorded and include information related to
the following:
a) changes in internal and external issues that are relevant to the laboratory;
b) fulfilment of objectives;
c) suitability of policies and procedures;
d) status of actions from previous management reviews;
e) outcome of recent internal audits;
f) corrective actions;
g) assessments by external bodies;
h) changes in the volume and type of the work or in the range of laboratory activities;
i) customer and personnel feedback;
j) complaints;
k) effectiveness of any implemented improvements;
l) adequacy of resources;
m) results of risk identification;
n) outcomes of the assurance of the validity of results; and
o) other relevant factors, such as monitoring activities and training.
8.9.3 The outputs from the management review record all decisions and actions related to
at least:
a) the effectiveness of the management system and its processes;
b) improvement of the laboratory activities related to the fulfilment of the re-
quirements of this document;
c) provision of required resources;
d) any need for change.

9 USE OF ACCREDITATION BODY SYMBOL
9.1.1 The laboratory, when reporting accredited results uses either the accreditation
body symbol or the following statement (edited as appropriate): “This calibration/test is ac-
credited under the laboratory’s ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation issued by [Accreditation Body
Name]. Refer to certificate and scope of accreditation [insert accreditation number here]”.
9.1.2 The accreditation body symbol is being used properly (if being used) when making
reference to the laboratory’s accreditation in communication media such as the internet, doc-
uments, brochures, or advertising.
9.1.3 The laboratory uses the accreditation body symbol only within its scope of accredi-
tation except where accredited and non-accredited results are on the same report/certificate.
In such cases, non-accredited results are to be clearly defined and a footnote to acknowledge
that the report/certificate includes non-accredited work.
9.1.4 The laboratory ensures that:

a) it does not make any misleading or unauthorized statements regarding its accredita-
tion;
b) reports or certificates containing the accreditation body symbol are not used in a mis-
leading manner;
c) it does not use its accreditation to imply that a product, process, system, or person is
approved by accreditation body;
d) it does not use the accreditation body symbol on cover sheets for sub-contracted cali-
brations.
9.1.5 If the laboratory uses the ILAC mark:

a) it ensures to use it only in conjunction with the accreditation body symbol;
b) the laboratory has obtained permission from accreditation body;
c) the accreditation number (for example ХХ-XXXX) included with the accreditation
body symbol;
d) it does not use the ILAC mark on business cards;
e) it ensures that requirements of ILAC and accreditation body are met.

ANNEX A
ORGANIZATION CHART
QMS.01.1
ORGANIZATION CHART
CEO
Laboratory
Head
Quality Senior Consulting

Manager Technician Engineer
Calibration
Technician

ANNEX B
PROCESSES INTERACTION CHART
QMS.01.2
PROCESSES INTERACTION CHART
Customer Feedback
P5
Management
Requirements
Regulatory
Lab Quality Lab

Head Manager Head
Control
Customer Quality Laboratory P7
Interaction Management Management
Metrological Assurance
Manufacturer
Instrument
Consulting Engineer & Senior Technician

Instruments Specification
Methods
Equipment Uncertainty Methods
Development
Management Analysis & Data
& Validation
Request
Calibration
Customers
Customers
Calibration Technician
Calibrated
Instruments & Requirements Instruments & Docs
P1 Environment
Calibration
P2 Conditions P6
Workflow
P3 Monitoring
Resources
Suppliers
Senior Lab Lab

Technician Head Head
P4
Accommoda-
Inventories Personnel P8
tion
Environment
Calibration
Laboratory

QMS.01.2.2
COMPLAINT HANDLING
Complaint
Acknowledge
Receipt Corrective action Management
Customer
Actions Outcome
Complaint
Investigation based upon Effectiveness Analisys Approval
validating
risk level
Customer
Customer interaction
interaction // Complaints
Complaints
Laboratory Management Quality Management
ERP&CRM Control of
/ontrol
Risk register
system records
Management
Management
Processes
Metrological
Calibration Resources
Assurance

B.1 Processes Interaction Chart shows:
− relationships between quality management, technical operations, and support services

(see 5.5 a). Four main processes are defined: Management, Calibration, Metrological Assur-
ance and Resourses, including the subprocesses;
− responsibility of all personnel who manage, perform or verify work affecting the quali-
ty of the calibrations (see 5.5 b) and performance of management system (see 5.6);
− interaction lines between main processes. Lines demonstrate both flows of instru-
ments, requirements and resources (direction of the flow is shown with arrow) and communi-
cation activity (communication is bi-directional, its direction is not shown. If interaction line
exists then communication is made);
− and policies (P1…P8) as the control gates of processes or the special rules for ingoing
or outgoing process data. This new approach is applied to find the proper place for the policy
statements in daily laboratory work. The policies are under laboratory head supervision.
B.2 Policy Statements:
P1: Copper Mountain Technologies ensures the protection of its customers’ confidential
information and proprietary rights, including protecting the electronic storage and transmis-
sion of results (see 4.2).
P2: Copper Mountain Technologies avoids involvement in any activities that would di-
minish confidence in its competence, impartiality, judgment or operational integrity (see 4.1).
P3: All requests, tenders and contracts are considered in detail even if the requirements
exceed the capabilities of laboratory (see 7.1).
P4: Any deviations from requested services and supplies are discussed with the labora-
tory head (see 6.6). Services and supplies with deviations deemed significant to the calibra-
tion work are rejected. Corrective action will be initiated as deemed appropriate.
P5: All complaints received from customers or other parties are considered in detail (see
7.9).
P6: When any aspect of calibration work, or the results of this work, do not conform to
laboratory procedures or the agreed requirements of the customer an information about it
immediately passes to quality manager (see 7.10).
P7: When nonconforming work or departures from the policies and procedures in the
management system or technical operations have been identified the correction action is im-
plemented immediately together with a decision about the acceptability of the nonconform-
ing work (see 8.7).
P8: For identifying training needs and providing training of personnel the verbal com-
munication is used, and captured in RCD.010 Personnel Record (see 6.2).
B.3 Processes Description:
In this document the process approach for describing the quality management system is
implemented. Processes and subprocesses are defined, authorities are assigned. Because of
size of the calibration laboratory an employee at certain position participates at several main
processes. Therefore it is impractical to document the procedures separately. Under the condi-
tions the best solution is to describe process steps for every employee at certain position. The
steps are in annex E.
To guarantee the proper implementation for all of processes that are covered with quali-
ty management system and described in this manual the brief instructions (comments) are
provided for each of documents or folders with that the employee must work. Comments are
part of the document and additional identification is not needed.
Implementation of all processes, subprocesses and procedures is guaranteed and is con-

firmed by documents maintenance and compliance with requirements to structure and rules
of access to the laboratory documentation. All documentation is divided between employees
and is used and is managed by them in daily work.

B.4 Procedures Matrix

Related
Parent Parent Procedure Procedure
Instructions Documents
Process Subprocess Title Description
and Records
Laboratory Head
1 Define personal responsibility for every activity.
2 Define deputy for every position.
3 Provide full access to information linked with la- P2
Impartiality 4.1 boratory activity. RCD.010
4 Systematically conduct trainings. RCD.110
5 Use semi-automatic calibration software.
6 Monitor risks to impartiality (see procedure 8.5).
1 Define rules of access for employees.
2 Provide data security through internal networking
P1
Confidentiality 4.2 systems that are installed behind an Internet fire-
Management
Privacy Policy
Interaction
Customer
wall.
3 Define Privacy policy and publish it in Web-site.
1 Define and understand the requirements (together
P3
with senior technician).
Scope of ac-
2 Analyze resources and opportunities using scope
creditation
of accreditation and current workload.
RCD.040
Review of 3 Communicate with customer if external provider
RCD.042
requests, tenders 7.1 performs specific lab activities, gain customer’s ap-
RCD.044
and contracts proval. External provider should be evaluated as 6.6.
RCD.060
4 Select appropriate calibration method. Inform cus-
RCD.062
tomer of the method chosen. Communicate with cus-
EPR&CRM sys-
tomer when method requested is inappropriate or
tem
out of date.


Related
and Records
5 Define both the specification or standard and the
corresponding decision rule if statement of conform-
ity is requested. Decision rule selected should be
agreed with customer.
6 Document in any way the review, including any
significant changes.
7 Inform customer of any deviation from the con-
tract.
8 Repeat contract review and communicate to all
affected person when any amendments.
9 Be in touch with customer.
1 Accept every request, feedbacks in different ways
(website, phone, e-mail, etc). Use and analyze it to EPR&CRM sys-
improve work processes. tem
Improvement
8.6 2 Identify needed improvements and potential Web-site
(Option A)
sources of non-conformities. RCD.070
3 Allow to visit calibration facilities. (OFI type)
4 Maintain Contact Us webpage.
1 Receive and document the complaint according to EPR&CRM sys-
company’s information system rules. tem
2 Validate the complaint: check that described case RCD.061
Complaints 7.9
is exactly related with laboratory activity. RCD.070
3 Perform cause analysis (together with quality RCD.071
manager). RCD.110


Related
and Records
4 Implement corrective actions (together with quali-
ty manager) if necessary. Pay attention, the actions
should be based upon risk level (see RCD.110 Risk
Register for potential complaints cases).
5 Ensure that the actions taken will resolve the
complaint.
6 Save all records, including actions undertaken.
7 Communicate outcome to customer.
8 Be in touch with customer.
1 Analyze information (see 8.9.2).
Management 2 Define weaknesses.
RCD.090
reviews (Option 8.9 3 Define changes or improvements.
RCD.091
A) 4 Fix the results (see 8.9.3).
5 Check for implementation.
1 Analyze results of reviews and define and classify
Management
Laboratory
risks and opportunities for next key directions:

- lab and company essence;
Actions to - lab activities including risk to its impartiality;
address risks and - management system effectiveness.
8.5 RCD.110
opportunities 2 Plan actions to prevent risks achieved and improve
(Option A) opportunities defined.
3 Evaluate the effectiveness of these actions during
management review.


Related
and Records
1 Monitor actuality of competence requirements.
Redefine if needed.
2 Assess the competence of personnel once a year or
before new authorization. Assessment methods to be
used:
- direct supervision;
- classroom discussion;
- 1-on-1 training, etc.
Use competence requirements when new worker is
Resourses
Personnel
being accepted for employment. P8

Personnel 6.2 3 Perform training if needed: RCD.010
- Assess needs for training. Annex E
- Define training topic and training schedule.
- Perform training.
- Assess effectiveness of training in follow-up audit.
4 Ensure supervision of how personnel work in daily
routine.
8 Assign the authorization and deputy authorization
for every person.
9 Monitor the competence of personnel. Reassess
immediately if there is found competence's decline.


Related
and Records
Accommodation
Facilities and
environmental 6.3 QMS.CAL.01, QMS.GNR.02 RCD.020
conditions
Quality Manager
1 Use rules of access for employees.
2 Use semi-automatic calibration software.
3 Use data security through internal networking sys-
Quality Management
tems that are installed behind an Internet firewall. EPR&CRM

Management
To control the documents and records in the proper system

Documents and 7.5, 7.11, way it is necessary to fill in the RCD.050 record. G-Suite
Records 8.3, 8.4 1 Define list of all laboratory documents. RCD.050
2 Check current revision status of document. RCD.051
3 Enter the change to document and identified it if RCD.052
necessary (together senior technician if needed).
4 Approve document, put into folder.
5 Assign the last actualization date.


Related
and Records
6 Assign document owner and storage folder.
7 Perform back up where applicable.
8 Perform periodically review.
To manage the non-conforming calibration work in
the proper way it is necessary to fill in the RCD.070.
1 Fix the nonconforming work and, as applicable:
- takes action to control and corrects it;
- addresses the consequences.
2 Assign responsible person.
3 Evaluate significance of nonconformity work in-
cluding an impact analysis on previous results based
on risk-oriented approach. Take a decision on the
possibility of continuing calibration (together with
Nonconforming P6
7.10 laboratory head if needed).
work RCD.070
4 Perform cause analysis to evaluate the need for
action to eliminate the cause(s) of the nonconformi-
ty, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere,
by:
- reviewing and analyzing the nonconformity;
- determining the causes of the nonconformity;
- determining if similar nonconformities exist, or
could potentially occur.
5 Take a decision about the acceptability of noncon-
formity work.


Related
and Records
6 Notify customer and recall work if needed.
7 Implement corrective action if evaluation indicates
possibility of recursion and / or nonconformity with
management system requirements.
8 Give info gathered to lab head to take his/her per-
mission on work resumption.
To manage the corrective action in the proper way it
is necessary to fill in the RCD.071 record.
1 Collect all complaints and non-conformity records.
2 Perform cause analysis.
3 Prepare correction action plan.
P7
Corrective 4 Monitor plan fulfillments.
RCD.061
actions (Option 8.7 5 Review the effectiveness of any corrective action
RCD.070
A) taken.
RCD.071
6 Update risks and opportunities determined during
planning, if necessary.
7 Make changes to the management system, if nec-
essary.
6 Perform audit (see 8.8) if necessary.


Related
and Records
To manage the internal audit in the proper way it is

necessary to fill in the RCD.080 and RCD.081 rec-
ords.
1 Define internal audit schedule.
2 Define processes to be controlled, audit criteria
relayed.
3 Carry out internal audit. Methods used during audit
are next: interview, observe and docs review. Take
Internal audits RCD.080
8.8 into consideration the importance of lab activities
(Option A) RCD.081
concerned, changes affecting and results of previous
audits.
4 Assess effectiveness of corrective actions.
5 Bring audit data to laboratory head.
6 Implement appropriate correction and corrective
actions without undue delay.
7 Verify audit data (corrective action implementa-
tion, effectiveness, etc) in follow-up audit.


Related
and Records
Senior Technician
QMS.EQP.01, QMS.TRC.01 (Traceability chains)
Establishing and changing of calibration interval:

1 Define equipment manufacturer recommendations.
2 Analyze intensiveness of equipment exploitation,
data of previous calibrations, maintenance and re-
pair.
Management
Equipment
Equipment, 3 Establish interval according manufacturer recom- RCD.030

Metrological 6.4, 6.5 mendations if analysis data are satisfactory and ex- RCD.032
Metrological
traceability ploitation is performed on regular base. RCD.033

Assurance
4 When analytical data are suspicious, reduce inter-

val to the next. Interval is defined as 6, 12, 18 or 24
months, or other interval as deemed appropriate.
5 When analysis data are satisfactory and exploita-
tion is performed rarely, increase interval to the next.
Interval is defined as 6, 12, 18 or 24 months, or oth-
er interval as deemed appropriate.
Uncertainty
Evaluation of
Analysis
Scope of ac-
measurement 7.6 QMS.TRC.01
creditation
uncertainty


Related
and Records
1 Define schedule for monitoring the validity of re-
sults:
- take a part in proficiency testing in regular base;
- perform functional check(s) and/or intermediate
checks on equipment;
- use one from different methods and/or different
Calibration
equipment (where applicable);
data
Ensuring the va- - review and investigate reported results.
7.7 Proficiency
lidity of results 2 Determine criteria for each discipline in accord-
testing results
ance with the scope.
RCD.120
3 Analyze results obtained during monitoring, in-
cluding trend behavior.
4 Use statistical software (where applicable).
5 Implement corrective actions if needed.
6 Present the monitoring analysis data in manage-
ment review.
1 Define an instrument specification to be checked
ment & Validation
Methods Develop-
during calibration.
Selection, 2 Define a method for calibration from RCD.043 or RCD.043
verification and develop a new method. QMS.CAL.01
7.2
validation of 3 Fill in RCD.043 for new method. QMS.GNR.01
methods 4 If parameter defined by new method is used or QMS.TRC.01
planned to be used in lab scope of accreditation:


Related
and Records
a) Save obtained verification / validation / proficien-
cy test data for new method;
b) Compare data with specified requirements in
scope of accreditation (or in project of scope);
c) Define uncertainty and traceability requirements
in QMS.TRC.01 for new method.
5 Add new issue into QMS.CAL.01 and QMS.GNR.01.
1 Monitor actuality of laboratory requirements. Re-
define if needed.
2 Select type, specs and manufacturer if required for
absent inventories (equipment, consumable materi- P4
als, etc) or define requirements for externally provid- RCD.030
ed services. RCD.032
3 Use EPR&CRM system to place order for absent RCD.033
Externally
Inventories
Resourses
inventories or services required, together with de- RCD.043

provided
6.6 tailed description and/or bring the information to lab RCD.050
products and
head. RCD.100
services
4 Monitor current status of request to ensure that it FM2015
was reviewed and approved or to be able correct or EPR&CRM
cancel it promptly. Communicate with lab head if system
necessary. Annex B.5
5 If item requested should be bought from supplier
which is absent in list of approved suppliers the suf-
ficient approving should be performed before.


Related
and Records
6 Discuss any actions arising from approving with
lab head.
7 Communicate with supplier to clearance lab re-
quirements.
8 Receive requested item.
9 Verify item and its docs. If the item is not comply
with its specs and lab requirements, do not use it in
laboratory activities.
10 Fill in RCD.030, RCD.032, RCD.033, RCD.043,
RCD.050, RCD.100, if applicable.
11 Deliver item to work places or directly provide to
customer.
Calibration Technician
P6
QMS.CAL.01 RCD.040
Calibration
7.5, 7.8 Fill in RCD.040 record for calibration data (technical RCD.041
Calibration
Calibration
Workflow
Procedure
records). Calibration
data
EPR&CRM
Handling of
7.4 QMS.GNR.01 system
calibration items
QMS.GNR.01.1


Related
Environment and Records
Monitoring
Conditions
Environment RCD.020,
Conditions 6.3.3 QMS.GNR.01 Logger data,
Monitoring QMS.GNR.01.1

B.5 Criteria for evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance and re-evaluation of ex-
ternal providers
Calibration laborato-
Proficiency test pro-

Original equipment
National metrology
(tool) manufacturer
Equipment (tool)
institute
dealers
Others
vider
ry
Evaluation
Method Q* Q Q* Q & A* Q & A* Q & A*
Criteria:
Competencies in manufacturing O P
Competencies in services (exc. cali- O O O
bration)
Competencies in calibration P O O
Maintenance and repair P P P P
Competencies in quality management P P P
Selection
CIPM MRA participant O
Accreditation for ISO/IEC 17025 P P O P
Accreditation for ISO/IEC 17043 O
Monitoring of performance
Period & method NA 3Q 3Q 3Q&A* 3Q&A* 3Q&A*
Re-Evaluation
Period & method NA 6Q 6Q 6Q 6Q 6Q
Method (in case of quality discrepancy) NA A A A A A
Comments:
Method: NA – not applicable; Q – questionnaire; I – incoming inspection; A – audit; S – site
visits; * - if necessary;
Period: 1 time in number of years;
Selection marks: O – obligatory requirement, P - permitted, could be qualified as an ad-
vantage.

ANNEX C
POLICY STATEMENTS



ANNEX D
STRUCTURE OF DOCUMENTATION
QMS.01.4
STRUCTURE OF DOCUMENTATION
Level 0:
International Standard
ISO/IEC 17025
Level 1:
Quality Manual &
Certificate and Scope of
Accreditation
Level 2:
Methods & Work
Instructions
Level 3:
Records & User Manual

ANNEX E
PERSONNEL COMPETENCE
E.1 Competence requirements QMS.01.5
Calibration
Laboratory
technician
technician
manager
Quality
Senior
head
Education
Technical X X X X
Qualification
Electrical Engineering or a related field X X X
Trainings
ISO/IEC 17025 external training X X
Internal training “Introduction to ISO/IEC 17025 and AN- X X
SI/NSCL Z540-1”
Internal training “Quality management system (NC, CA, PA)” X X
Internal training “Complaints” X X
Internal training “Conducting Audit” X X
Internal training “Proficiency testing: what it is and why it’s X X
important”
Technical knowledge
Frequency measurements and uncertainty calculations X X X
Reflection measurements and uncertainty calculations X X X
Transmission measurements and uncertainty calculations X X X
RF power measurements and uncertainty calculations X X X
Skill
Receipt and handling of equipment and accessories X X
Housekeeping, access control, PC maintenance, environ- X X
mental conditions
Packaging, return shipment X X
Experience
Ability to process orders, quoting, review of RFQ (Odoo) X X
Ability to use Google Drive (QMS), understanding of its or- X X
ganization, permissions existing
Ability to perform document control X X

Calibration
Laboratory
technician
technician
manager
Quality
Senior
head
Ability to determine equipment to purchase, managing X X
suppliers list
Ability to perform equipment maintenance, its intermediate X X
checking, understanding traceability requirements
Ability to install and use VNAPT, *.prf files, printing test re- X X X
ports and certificates
Ability to compile and control workflow checklist, under- X X X
standing CAL and GNR documents
E2 Relevant authorization
Laboratory personnel are authorized to perform specific laboratory activities:
- calibration activity includes calibration procedure together with reporting; handling of

test or calibration items; environment conditions monitoring (see annex B.4);
- equipment maintenance activity includes equipment management, metrological tracea-

bility; evaluation of measurement uncertainty; ensuring the validity of results; selection, veri-
fication and validation of methods; externally provided products and services (see annex B.4);
- certificate issuing activity includes reviewing and authorization of calibration results and
continuing analysis of results, including statements of conformity or opinions and interpreta-
tions.

E.3 Personnel job descriptions
LABORATORY HEAD JOB DESCRIPTION JD.01 Version 3
The Laboratory Head reviews incoming work requests and clarifies discrepancies. He/She reviews laboratory data with respect to the calibration
laboratory quality system and calibration standards and for accuracy and conformance to customer and/or specification requirements. The Laboratory Head
oversees maintenance of lab equipment. He/She must report to the Quality Manager and CEO about the data which falls outside the quality acceptance
criteria. The Laboratory Head shall notify the Quality Manager of any quality problem. The Laboratory Head reports directly to the CEO.
Direct work is management of laboratory activities, including customer interaction, and observance of laboratory objectives and policies.
With what? How?
Accommodation Management Review

Environment Conditions Business Planning
Resources Continuous Improvement
QMS.01 Quality Manual and Policies
Process Steps Outputs

Inputs
1. Waiting for calibration request RCD.010 Personnel List
Customers Requests, Responses & Complaints Resources and Opportunites Analysis RCD.020 Accommodation Data List
Scope of Accreditation Cost defining QMS.CAL.01 Performance Test Manual
JD.01 to JD.04 Job Descriptions Scheduling QMS.GNR.02 Calibration Lab Housekeeping
RCD.040 Calibrations List Initialization of preliminary works if needed RCD.042 Calibration Schedule
RCD.042 Calibration Schedule Pay, Job and Response Monitoring RCD.044 Calibration Contracts List
RCD.070 Non-Conformity Record 2. Approve action when non-conformity, give a RCD.060 Customers List
RCD.071 Corrective Action Plan permission for work resumption RCD.061 Complaints List
RCD.080 Internal Audits Schedule 3. Assure the safety work RCD.062 Calibration Contracts
RCD.081 Internal Audit Record 4. Implement employee development program RCD.090 Management Reviews Plan
RCD.090 Management Reviews Plan 5. Monitor the effectiveness resource RCD.091 Management Reviews Records
RCD.100 Suppliers List utilization RCD.100 Suppliers List
6. Monitor the customers satisfaction RCD.110 Risk Register
Measures of Effectiveness
With Whom? Customers Satisfaction

Performance to plan
CEO Resource Utilization
Quality Manager Safety
Senior Technician Employee Development

QUALITY MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION JD.02 Version 3
The Quality Manager manages the calibration laboratory operating systems such as quality systems and laboratory report formats. He/She documents,
implements, and reviews quality procedures and monitors the quality system to ensure compliance with the Copper Mountain Technologies objectives and
ISO/IEC 17025. He/She reports the status of quality programs to the Laboratory Head and CEO through formal and informal communication. The Quality
Manager issues corrective actions when required. The Quality Manager is authorized to review all laboratory data with respect to the calibration laboratory
quality system. The Quality Manager has the authority to require that procedures be amended or discontinued, or analysis suspended or repeated.
Direct work is the assuring the effectiveness of quality system and documents management.
With what? How?
Accommodation International, region or national standards or

Environment Conditions others recognized specifications
QMS.01 Quality Manual
Inputs Process Steps Outputs
1. Waiting for an event: Update, Response, QMS.01 Quality Manual with annexes
Responses, Feedbacks and Suggestions
Suggestion, Complaint, Non-conformity, Audit JD.01 to JD.04 Job Descriptions
RCD.010 Personnel List
Reflect the event in documentation RCD.050 Documents List
RCD.020 Accommodation Data List
Initialization actions when non-conformity RCD.051 Master List
Logger database
Perform cause analysis RCD.052 Structure of folders
QMS.GNR.02 Calibration Lab Housekeeping
Implement corrective and/or preventive RCD.070 Non-conformity Record
RCD.030 Equipment List
actions RCD.071 Corrective Action Plan
RCD.032 Equipment Test Results
2. Analyze quality system, search opportunities RCD.080 Internal Audit Schedule
RCD.033 Equipment Label Sample
3. Continuously improve quality system RCD.081 Internal Audit Records
RCD.042 Calibration Schedule
4. Permanently perform document control RCD.110 Risk Register
RCD.040 Calibrations List
RCD.060 Customers List
RCD.061 Complaints List
Measures of Effectiveness
RCD.070 Non-conformity Record
RCD.071 Corrective Action Plan RCD.070 Nonconformities Records
RCD.080 Internal Audit Schedule RCD.061 Complaints List
RCD.090 Management Reviews Plan Who?
Formal and Informal Communication
RCD.091 Management Reviews Records
Quality Manager
RCD.110 Risk Register

SENHOR TECHNHCHAN JOB DESCRHPTHON JD.03 Version 3

TOese PecOniciMns conducP Mssigned lMborMPory work in Ois/Oer MreM of responsibiliPy Mnd Mlso perform mMinPenMnce, wOen possible, of lMborMPory
equipmenP in Ois/Oer MreM of responsibiliPy Mnd mMinPMin POe MppropriMPe mMinPenMnce logs. TOese PecOniciMns sOMll noPify POe IMborMPory HeMd wOen dMPM
fMlls ouPside POe quMliPy MccepPMnce criPeriM. TOese PecOniciMns sOMll Mlso noPify POe QuMliPy MMnMger of Mny quMliPy problems. TOe PecOniciMns reporP Po
IMborMPory HeMd.
DirecP work is mePOods developmenP Mnd vMlidMPion, equipmenP mMinPenMnce, invenPories purcOMse, Mnd ouPpuP cMlibrMPion dMPM MpprovMl.
With what? How?
EquipmenP HnPernMPionMl, region or nMPionMl sPMndMrds or

AccommodMPion oPOers recognized specificMPions
EnvironmenP CondiPions Scope of MccrediPMPion
RCD.043 MePOods IisP
Process Steps QMS.EQP.01 EquipmenP mMnuMl
QMS.SDD.01 SofPwMre Design DescripPions
1. Define Mn insPrumenP specificMPion Po be
cOecked during cMlibrMPion
2. Define M mePOod for cMlibrMPion from
RCD.043 or develop M new mePOod Outputs
3. Define uncerPMinPy Mnd PrMceMbiliPy
Inputs requiremenPs in QMS.TRC.01 for new mePOod RCD.043 MePOods IisP
4. Add new issue QMS.CAI.01 Mnd QMS.GNR.01 QMS.TRC.01 TrMceMbiliPy Guide
HnsPrumenPs SpecificMPion 5. Fill in RCD.043 for POe new mePOod QMS.CAI.01 PerformMnce TesP MMnuMl
HnvenPories Mnd iPs user mMnuMls 6. SelecP Pype, specs Mnd mMnufMcPurer if QMS.GNR.01 CMlibrMPion Work Flow
RCD.100 Suppliers IisP required for MbsenP invenPories or services QMS.GNR.01.1 Workflow COeck lisP
QMS.GNR.01.1 Workflow COeck IisP 7. PlMce order for MbsenP invenPories VMlidMPed HnvenPories (EquipmenP, ePc.)
RCD.040 CMlibrMPion IisP 8. Receive requesPed invenPories Mnd cOeck iP QMS.EQP.01 EquipmenP mMnuMl
RCD.041 CMlibrMPion CerPificMPe E. CorrecP QMS.EQP.01 if needed RCD.030 EquipmenP IisP
RCD.030 EquipmenP IisP 10. Fill in RCD.030, RCD.032, RCD.033, RCD.032 EquipmenP TesP ResulPs
RCD.120 VMlidiPy ScOedule RCD.043, RCD.050, RCD.100, if MpplicMble RCD.033 EquipmenP IMbel
11. Deliver invenPories Po work plMces RCD.050 DocumenPs IisP
12. HmplemenP QMS.CAI.01 Mnd QMS.GNR.01 RCD.120 VMlidiPy ScOedule
13. COeck mePOod implemenPMPion Mnd
received cMlibrMPion dMPM in QMS.GNR.01.1
14. COeck Mnd Mpprove RCD.040, RCD.041
15. PeriodicMlly equipmenP verificMPion Measures of Effectiveness
With whom? 16. MoniPor vMlidiPy of resulPs
RCD.070 NonconformiPies Records
ConsulPing Engineer AmounP of Mmends in CMlibrMPion Docs

JD.04 Version 1
CALIBRATION TECHNICIAN JOB DESCRIPTION

These technicians conduct assigned laboratory work in his/her area of responsibility. These technicians shall notify the Senior Technician when data falls outside the
acceptance criteria. These technicians shall also notify the Quality Manager of any quality problems. The technicians report to the Senior Technician.
Direct work is an instrument calibration and maintenance of output calibration data.
Equipment QMS.GNR.01 Calibration Work Flow Instruction

Accommodation QMS.CAL.01 Performance Test Manual
Environment Conditions VNAPT software
Equipment Manuals
1. Review Requirements Instrument Under Test

Instrument Under Test 2. Fill in Work Flow Check List RCD.040 Calibrations List
Customer Requirements 3. Perform Calibration RCD.041 Calibration Certificate
RCD.042 Calibration Schedule 4. Fill in Calibration Certificate QMS.GNR.01.1 Work Flow Check List
5. Fill in job row in Calibration List RCD.021 Environmental Condition Records
Calibration Technician RCD.070 Nonconformities Records

EndofDoc

Calibration Laboratory Quality Manual: Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Revision: 1 Date: November 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Calibration Laboratory Quality Manual: Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Revision: 1 Date: November 2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Calibration Laboratory Quality Manual: Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Revision: 1 Date: November 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Copper Mountain Technologies

Document Name: QMS.01:2018

DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 2 of 58 Revision: 1

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 3 of 58 Revision: 1

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 4 of 58 Revision: 1

7.9 Complaints ................................................................................................................................................ 25

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 5 of 58 Revision: 1

Approver: Laboratory Head

Approver: Consulting Engineer

Document Reviewer: Quality Manager

Document Owner: Quality Manager

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 6 of 58 Revision: 1

ISO/IEC Guide 99 International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts

ISO/IEC Guide 98-4 Uncertainty of measurement – Part 4: Role of measurement uncer-

3 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 7 of 58 Revision: 1

4.1.2 The laboratory management is committed to impartiality.

4.1.5 If a risk to impartiality is identified, the laboratory is able to demonstrate how it

4.2.2 When the laboratory is required by law or authorized by contractual arrange-

4.2.4 Personnel, including any committee members, contractors, personnel of external

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 8 of 58 Revision: 1

5.5 The laboratory has (annex B):

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 9 of 58 Revision: 1

d) reporting to laboratory management on the performance of the management system

5.7 Laboratory management ensures that:

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 10 of 58 Revision: 1

6.3 Facilities and environmental conditions

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 11 of 58 Revision: 1

activities and that can influence the results.

6.4.6 Measuring equipment is calibrated when:

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 12 of 58 Revision: 1

6.4.12 The laboratory takes practicable measures to prevent unintended adjustments of

6.5 Metrological traceability

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 13 of 58 Revision: 1

c) direct realization of the SI units ensured by comparison, directly or indirectly, with

6.6 Externally provided products and services

6.6.2 The laboratory has a procedure and retains records for:

6.6.3 The laboratory communicates its requirements to external providers for:

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 14 of 58 Revision: 1

7.1 Review of requests, tenders and contracts

7.1.3 When the customer requests a statement of conformity to a specification or

7.1.5 The customer is informed of any deviation from the contract.

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 15 of 58 Revision: 1

peated and any amendments are communicated to all affected personnel.

7.1.7 The laboratory cooperates with customers or their representatives in clarifying

7.2 Selection, verification and validation of methods

7.2.1 Selection and verification of methods

7.2.1.2 All methods, procedures and supporting documentation, such as instructions,

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 16 of 58 Revision: 1

7.2.2 Validation of methods

7.2.2.1 The laboratory validates non-standard methods, laboratory-developed methods

7.2.2.4 The laboratory retains the following records of validation:

7.4 Handling of calibration items

Document Name: QMS.01:2018 Page 17 of 58 Revision: 1

7.4.4 When items need to be stored or conditioned under specified environmental

7.5 Technical records

7.6 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty