Week 2 Proposal
Week 2 Proposal
Week 2 Proposal
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
Ugwumadu, Obianuju C.
Department of Project Management Technology,
Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria
Received: July 15, 2018 Accepted: August 20, 2018 Online published: August 27, 2018
doi:10.5296/ijhrs.v8i3.13555 URL: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v8i3.13555
Abstract
For some time, the banking sector in Nigeria has been witnessing incessant labour turnover.
The study focused on the factors motivating employee loyalty and employee retention in the
deposit money banks. This study used descriptive survey research design. Four banks namely
First Bank of Nigeria, United Bank for Africa, Guaranty Trust Bank and First City Monument
Bank were randomly selected for the study. The sample size for the study consists of 190
employees out of the total population of 360 employees. A set of self constructed
questionnaire was used for data collection. 118 copies of the questionnaire that were correctly
completed out of the 190 copies which were administered were used for the study.
Percentages, frequency and mean ranking were used to analyze the data collected. The result
showed that training and development (3.95) and promotion (3.86) were the main motivating
factors for employee loyalty while training and development (4.01) and job security (3.90)
were the best ranked employee retention factors. The implication of the result is that, apart
from training and development, the better motivating factors for employee loyalty and
employee retention are not the same. The result of the hypothesis showed a strong positive
relationship between employee retention and loyalty factors in deposit money banks(r = 0.83).
It is recommended that management should provide quality training and development
programmes as important motivating factors for both employee loyalty and employee
retention. The inclusion of other major motivating factors in the organizations’ HRM policy
will be an added advantage.
300 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
301 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
302 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
ii. ascertain the relationship between factors motivating employee loyalty and retention in
the banks.
1.4 Research Hypothesis
Only one null hypothesis was formulated for the study:
H01: There is no significant relationship between employee retention factors and employee
loyalty factors in the deposit money banks
2. Literature Review
2.1 Conceptual Review
2.1.1 Concept of Retention
Retention is defined as a voluntary move by an organization to create an environment, which
engages employees for long term and with primary aim of preventing the loss of competent
employees from the organization as this could have adverse effects on productivity and
service delivery (Oginni, Dunmade & Ogunwole, 2018). The retention of high performing
employees has become more challenging for managers. Such employees are quite mobile and
frequently move from one job to another because many organizations want to attract and
poach them at a time. Luna-Arocas and Camps (2008) believe that maintaining a stable
workforce is one of the key sources of sustainable competitive advantage for organizations. It
is one thing to employ staff; it is another effort to retain them. Any organization that does not
retain its staff will be incurring costs of recruitment, training and retraining as well as
employee disloyalty. Employee retention is important to the overall success of any
organization. In this study, employee retention is viewed from the perspective of employees’
willingness to remain in the organization based on availability of motivating factors.
2.1.2 Concept of Loyalty
Kumar and Shekhar (2012) described loyalty as the willingness to put one’s personal needs
aside for the betterment of a relationship. It refers to a person’s preparedness to defend
another person or entity irrespective of the opinion of others. According to Antoncic and
Antoncic (2011), employees are loyal when they believe in the objectives of the company,
accept the objectives as their own, work for their common welfare, and want to stay in the
company. Employee loyalty is a deliberate commitment to further the best interests of one’s
employer, even when doing so may demand sacrificing some aspects of one’s self-interest
beyond what would be required by one’s legal and other moral duties. A loyal employee is
such that is willing to work in that organization, thinking or believing that to work in the
organization is the best option for him. For this purpose, the employee tries his best for the
success of the organization to ensure that it survives.
2.2 Theoretical Review
This study is based on equity theory by Adam Smith. Smith (1965) in the theory posits that
employees seek to maintain equity between the input that they bring into a job and the
outcome they receive from it against the perceived inputs and outcomes of other employees.
303 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
Employee input include effort, loyalty, hard work, commitment, skill, ability, adaptability,
flexibility, tolerance, determination, heart and soul, enthusiasm, trust in our boss and superiors,
support of colleagues and subordinates as well as personal sacrifice while the output include
pay, salary, expenses, perks, benefits, pension arrangements, bonus and commission - plus
intangibles - recognition, reputation, praise and thanks, interest, responsibility, stimulus, travel,
training, development, sense of achievement and advancement and promotion.
Equity theory proposes that individuals who perceive themselves as either under-rewarded or
over rewarded will experience distress, and that this leads to efforts to restore equity within
the organization. This theory appears appropriate for this study and it is used as the
theoretical framework.
2.3 Empirical Review
Employee loyalty and retention have attracted empirical studies recently due to their
importance. Logan (2000) found that opportunity to learn and do new things enhance
employee retention. It can be deduced that organizations that allow employee assertiveness
and use of their initiative in carrying out their duties will enhance employee loyalty and
retention. According to Clarke (2001), employees remain where there is strong relationship
with colleagues in the workplace. This can be viewed from the perspective of team building
for task accomplishments and interactions beyond the office. It can lead to team
encouragement for the achievement of set goals.
Samuel and Chipunza (2009) studied the use of motivational variables as a panacea for
employee retention and turnover reduction among employees of two private and two public
sector organizations in South Africa. The study which was based on cross-sectional survey
research design had a total population of 1800 employees and a sample size of 145
respondents. A self constructed questionnaire was used for data collection and Chi-square test
of association was used in testing the hypothesis formulated at 0.05 level of significance. The
result of the study indicated that intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors to a very large
extent influenced both private and public sector employees to remain on their job.
Specifically, training and development, challenging/interesting work, freedom for innovative
thinking and job security were found to influence employee retention in both private and
public organizations.
Nyamekye (2012) carried out a study to investigate the impact of motivation on the retention
of employees in Standard Chartered Bank, Ghana Limited. A total of 180 respondents were
selected for the study and regression analysis was used for data analysis. The result of the
study showed that motivational factors such as salary and fringe benefits were rated as most
important to the workforce of the bank, followed by job security and relationship with
co-workers. Other strategies rated important to the workforce are recognition, training
opportunities, openness and trust, promotional opportunities, and effective communication.
Sinha and Sinha (2012) studied the factors affecting employee retention among 100
employees holding middle managerial positions in two organizations from heavy engineering
industry in India. In EEPL three factors ranked in order of importance are competence and
304 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
relationship oriented, scholastic and futuristic oriented and developmental and reward
oriented. In MBPL, relationship oriented came first, followed by competence and scholastic
oriented and thirdly by reward oriented. Also, the employees of both companies found their
organizations retention factors adequate and suitable for them although the factors differ in
order of importance to the employees. The implication of this result is that what is good for
one set of employees may not motivate the other set based on individual differences and
interests.
Khuong and Tien (2013) worked on factors that have direct and indirect influence on
employee loyalty through job satisfaction among bank workers in Ho Chi Minh City
(HCMC), Vietnam. The study involved 201 employees of 11 banks. Multiple regression,
factor and path analyses were used to analyse the collected primary data. The study revealed
that job satisfaction, organizational environment and incentives among others were related to
organizational loyalty. The researchers recommended that those factors need to be provided
in the workplace for employee loyalty.
Osibanjo, Salau and Falola (2014) studied the relationship between motivational factors
(salary, promotion, incentives, award, relationships and benefits); employee retention and job
satisfaction in the Nigerian banking industry. The survey research design was adopted and
primary data were obtained through a self- administered questionnaire from the sample size
of three hundred and seventy six (376) respondents. AMOS 21 Structural Equation Model
(SEM) was used to analyse the data. The result showed that salary and promotion have strong
positive implications for employee retention. Similarly, incentives and benefits were also
found to have positive effects on job satisfaction. However, award and relationships were
found to have negative effects on job satisfaction.
Dama and Isah (2015) investigated the influence of training and development on staff
retention and loyalty among bank workers in Adamawa State, Nigeria. The sample size of the
research was 197 and the instrument used was a set of questionnaire. Using regression for
data analysis, they found that training and development positively affect staff retention and
loyalty.
Mwangi and Omondi (2016) conducted their study on factors influencing staff retention in
Equity Bank Limited, Kenya with 100 employees at various levels of management as study
sample. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics such as mean and standard
deviation and inferential statistics that include correlation and regression analysis. The study
revealed that financial and non–financial needs, reward system and training are factors
driving employee loyalty.
Oginni, Dunmade and Ogunwole (2018) examined employee’s work expectations,
satisfaction and labour turnover in the service industry in Nigeria. Data collected with the use
questionnaire from 542 respondents in three states were analyzed using correlation and
regression analysis. The study found a positive and strong relationship among the variables
and recommended that management should understand employees work expectations at the
point of entry. This will enable management to harmonize employee job expectations with
organizational expectations for the benefit of all stakeholders. The result showed positive
305 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
The validity of the research instrument (questionnaire) was determined using content
validity approach by ensuring that the instrument clearly defined some concepts and
constructs used to frame the items that highlight the concept or constructs used. The
reliability of the research instrument was measured using test-retest approach to test
the consistency level of the instrument employed for the study. The reliability
coefficient being r=0.8which is adequate.
4. Results
4.1 Response Rate per Bank
The 190 copies of questionnaire were distributed to the four banks as follows: FBN 63 copies
were administered with 41 retrieved, FCMB got 37 with 23 retrieved, UBA got 48 with 29
retrieved and GTB got 42 with 25 retrieved. In all 118 copies representing 62.1% were
306 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
307 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
308 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
309 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
310 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
311 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
Clarke, K. F. (2001). What businesses are doing to attract and retain employee—becoming an
employer of choice. Employee Benefits Journal, 34-37.
Dama, J. L., & Isah, M. B. (2015). Effect of training and development on employee’s
retention in Selected commercial banks in Adamawa State. European Journal of Business and
Management, 7(36), 96-101.
Fitz-Enz, J. (1990). Getting and keeping good employees. Personnel Journal, 67(8), 25–29.
Garg, P., & Rastongi, R. (2006). New model of job design motivation employees
performance. Journal of Management Development, 62(1), 25-33.
Gberevbie, D. E. (2008). Staff recruitment, retention strategies and performance of selected
public and private organizations in Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Covenant University,
Ota, Nigeria
Kassa, T. (2015). Employee motivation and its effect on employee retention in Ambo Mineral
Water Factory. International Journal of Advance Research in
Computer Science and Management Studies, 3(3), 10-21.
Khuong, M. N., & Tien, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing employee loyalty directly and
indirectly through job satisfaction: A study of banking sector in Ho Chi Minh City.
International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review, 1(4), 81-95.
Kumar, D. N. S., & Shekhar, N. (2012). Perspectives envisaging employee loyalty: A case
analysis. Journal of Management Research, 12(2), 100-112. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1033786746?accountid=14407
Lockwood, N. R. (2006). Talent management drivers for organisational success. Society for
Human Resources Management Research Quarterly Journal, 51(6), 1-11.
Logan, J. K. (2000). Retention tangibles and intangibles: More meaning in work is essential,
but good chair massages won’t hurt. Training and Development Journal, 54(4), 48-50.
Luna-Arocas, R., & Camps, J. (2008). A model of high performance work practices and
turnover intentions. Personnel Review.
Lyria, R. K. (2013).Effect of talent management on organizational performance in companies
listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. Unpublished PhD thesis, Jomo Kenyatta
University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.
Mehta, S., Singh, T., Bhakar, S., & Sinha, B. (2010). Employee loyalty towards organization.
International Journal for Business Management and Economic Resources, 1(1), 98-108.
Messmer, M. (2000). Orientations programs can be key to employee retention. In Strategic
Finance Journal, 81(8), 12-15.
Mwangi, E. K., & Omondi, M. (2016). Factors influencing staff retention in the banking
industry in Kenya: A case study of Equity Bank Limited. The Strategic Business and Change
Journal of Management, 3(20), 428-454.
312 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org
International Journal of Human Resource Studies
ISSN 2162-3058
2018, Vol. 8, No. 3
Copyright Disclaimer
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to
the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
313 http://ijhrs.macrothink.org