Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 165 views

    Sheet Pile Wall Design Based On 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC / ACI 318-19

    Uploaded by

    afvilavilanoriega
    This document provides a design summary and analysis for a sheet pile wall and flagpole footing. For the sheet pile wall: - The cantilever height is 10 ft with a 500 psf surcharge. - Lateral soil pressure is 35 pcf. Seismic pressure is 450 psf for heights over 12 ft. - Pile spacing is 4.0333 ft with 44 in diameter piles reinforced with 16 #11 bars and 6 #6 ties at 8 in. - Calculations check flexural and axial capacity as well as shear. The required embedment depth is 20.51 ft. For the flagpole footing: - The lateral force at the pole top is 104.23 kips

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Sheet Pile Wall Design Based On 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC / ACI 318-19

    Uploaded by

    afvilavilanoriega
    165 views3 pages
    This document provides a design summary and analysis for a sheet pile wall and flagpole footing. For the sheet pile wall: - The cantilever height is 10 ft with a 500 psf surcharge. - Lateral soil pressure is 35 pcf. Seismic pressure is 450 psf for heights over 12 ft. - Pile spacing is 4.0333 ft with 44 in diameter piles reinforced with 16 #11 bars and 6 #6 ties at 8 in. - Calculations check flexural and axial capacity as well as shear. The required embedment depth is 20.51 ft. For the flagpole footing: - The lateral force at the pole top is 104.23 kips

    Original Title

    Shoring

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a design summary and analysis for a sheet pile wall and flagpole footing. For the sheet pile wall: - The cantilever height is 10 ft with a 500 psf surcharge. - Lateral soil pressure is 35 pcf. Seismic pressure is 450 psf for heights over 12 ft. - Pile spacing is 4.0333 ft with 44 in diameter piles reinforced with 16 #11 bars and 6 #6 ties at 8 in. - Calculations check flexural and axial capacity as well as shear. The required embedment depth is 20.51 ft. For the flagpole footing: - The lateral force at the pole top is 104.23 kips

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    165 views3 pages

    Sheet Pile Wall Design Based On 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC / ACI 318-19

    Uploaded by

    afvilavilanoriega
    This document provides a design summary and analysis for a sheet pile wall and flagpole footing. For the sheet pile wall: - The cantilever height is 10 ft with a 500 psf surcharge. - Lateral soil pressure is 35 pcf. Seismic pressure is 450 psf for heights over 12 ft. - Pile spacing is 4.0333 ft with 44 in diameter piles reinforced with 16 #11 bars and 6 #6 ties at 8 in. - Calculations check flexural and axial capacity as well as shear. The required embedment depth is 20.51 ft. For the flagpole footing: - The lateral force at the pole top is 104.23 kips

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 3
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The documents discuss the design of sheet pile walls and flagpole foundations.

    A sheet pile wall design based on code requirements.

    Factors like height, surcharge weight, soil properties, concrete strength, rebar size are considered.

    PROJECT : PAGE :

    CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
    JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
    Sheet Pile Wall Design Based on 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC / ACI 318-19
    INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
    HEIGHT OF CANTILEVER Hcant = 10 ft
    SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 500 psf
    ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL-BEARING PRESSURE IN EMBEDMENT
    Pp = 300 psf / ft
    LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 35 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
    SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE = 450 psf / ft (for Hcant > 12 ft only)

    SOIL SPECIFIC WEIGHT gb = 110 pcf


    CONCRETE STRENGTH f c' = 4 ksi
    VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
    PILE DIAMETER D = 44 in
    PILE SPACING S = 4.0333 ft, o.c.
    PILE VERT. REINF. 16 # 11
    LATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
    LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 6 @ 8 in o.c.

    THE SHORING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.


    ( Hembd = 20.51 ft. Min. Req'D)

    ANALYSIS
    DETERMINE PILE SECTION FORCES AT CANTILEVER BOTTOM
    Hb = 0.5 S Pa (Hcant)2 = 7.06 kips, ASD
    Hs = ws S Pa (Hcant) / gb = 6.42 kips, ASD
    HE = 0.5 S PE (Hcant)2 = 90.75 kips, ASD
    P = S D ws + 0.25 p gc D2 Hcant = 23.23 kips, ASD
    V = Hb + HE + Hs = 104.23 kips, ASD
    M = (Hb /3 + 2HE /3 + Hs /2 ) Hcant = 520.1 ft-kips, ASD

    Pu = 1.2 P = 27.88 kips, SD


    Vu = 1.6 V = 166.76 kips, SD
    Mu = 1.6 M = 832.1 ft-kips, SD

    CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS


    fc ' = 4 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory] (IBC Table 1808.8.1)
    D= 44 in > MAX[( Hcant + Hembd) / 30 , 12 in] [Satisfactory] (IBC 1810.3.5.2)

    CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY

          2 
      f C'  2   c     c   , for 0   c   o  s E s , for  s   ty
    e
     fC    o    o   , f S
     '
     f y , for  s   ty
      e f C , for  c   o


    2 e f C
    '
     fy  ty , for compression controlled
     o  ,  ty  , t  
    Ec Es  ty  0.003 , for tension controlled
    '
    E c  57 f C , E s  29000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu  0.003
    (cont'd)

    Note:
    1. Between compression & tension controlled is
    f Pn (k) Transition, which the f should be by linear
    interpolation. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2.2 & Fig. R10.4.2.1)
    2. ACI 318-19 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2b) and keeps
    0
    be (22.2.2.4.1) and ecu (Fig. R21.2.2a) the same.
    0 500 But AISC 360/341-16 has different f (0.9 only) and
    be (1.0 or 0.7).

    Solid Black Line - Tension Controlled f Mn (ft-k)


    Solid Red Line - Transition f Mn = 1706 ft-kips @ Pu = 28 kips > Mu
    Dash Line - Compression Controlled [Satisfactory]

    CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY


    f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) = 312 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
    > Vu [Satisfactory]
    where f = 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)
    A0 = 1228 in2. Av = 0.88 in2. fy = 60 ksi
    Vc = 2 (fc')0.5A0 = 155.4 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
    Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) = 261.0 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5.1)
    smax = 12 (IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) sprovd = 8 in
    smin = 1 [Satisfactory]
    rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = 0.008 < rs,provd = 0.008 [Satisfactory] (ACI 318-19 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

    DETERMINE PILE EMBEDMENT LENGTH, Hembd, (IBC 1807.3)


    By trials, use pole depth, d = Hembd = 20.51 ft
    Lateral bearing @ bottom, S3 = 2 Pp Min( d , 12' ) = 7.20 ksf
    Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S1 = 2 Pp Min( d / 3 , 12' ) = 4.10 ksf
    Require Depth is given by
    A 4.36 h 
    d 1  1   for nonconstrained 
    2 A  20.51 ft [Satisfactory]

    Where P =V = 104.23 kips


    A = 2.34 P / (D S1) = 16.21
    h =M / V = 4.99 ft
    PROJECT : PAGE :
    CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
    JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
    Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
    INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
    IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 0 no P
    LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 104.23 k
    HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h= 4.989739 ft
    DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b= 3.666667 ft h
    LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.3 ksf / ft
    ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 09 1806.3.4) F= 2
    FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> d = 20 ft

    Use 3.66666666666667 ft dia x 20.51 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level d

    ANALYSIS

    LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  d , 12 '


    LATERAL BEARING @ d/3 : d 
    S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
    3 
    2.34 P
    A
    bS 1
    A 4.36h 
     1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
    REQUIRD DEPTH : 2  A 
    d 
     4.25 Ph , FOR CONSTRAINED
     bS 3

    NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
    LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 104.23 k 104.23 k
    HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h => 5.0 ft 5.0 ft
    DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b => 3.67 ft 3.67 ft
    LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.60 ksf / ft 0.60 ksf / ft

    1ST TRIAL TRY d1 => 20.00 ft 20.00 ft


    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.00 ksf 4.00 ksf
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.63 - -
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.95 ft 9.15 ft

    2ND TRIAL : TRY d2=> 20.47 ft 14.57 ft


    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.09 ksf 2.91 ksf
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.24 - -
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.54 ft 9.15 ft

    3RD TRIAL : TRY d3=> 20.51 ft 11.86 ft


    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.37 ksf
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.12 ksf
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.22 - -
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.52 ft 9.20 ft

    4TH TRIAL : TRY d4=> 20.51 ft 10.53 ft


    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.11 ksf
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.32 ksf
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.21 - -
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.51 ft 9.77 ft

    5TH TRIAL : TRY d5=> 20.51 ft 10.15 ft


    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.03 ksf
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.09 ksf
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.21 - -
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.51 ft 9.95 ft

    You might also like