Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
328 views

Drilled Cast-In-Place Pile Design Based On ACI 318-19: Project: Client: Design By: Job No.: Date: Review by

This document provides a design summary for a drilled cast-in-place pile based on ACI 318-19 standards. It includes input data such as concrete strength, pile dimensions, and load values. The analysis checks the pile for limitations, flexural and axial capacity, and shear capacity. While most criteria are satisfied, the analysis finds the shear reinforcement spacing is unsatisfactory based on the code. It also determines the pile head condition would be pinned based on the tension development length criteria not being met.

Uploaded by

afvilavilanoriega
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
328 views

Drilled Cast-In-Place Pile Design Based On ACI 318-19: Project: Client: Design By: Job No.: Date: Review by

This document provides a design summary for a drilled cast-in-place pile based on ACI 318-19 standards. It includes input data such as concrete strength, pile dimensions, and load values. The analysis checks the pile for limitations, flexural and axial capacity, and shear capacity. While most criteria are satisfied, the analysis finds the shear reinforcement spacing is unsatisfactory based on the code. It also determines the pile head condition would be pinned based on the tension development length criteria not being met.

Uploaded by

afvilavilanoriega
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PROJECT : PAGE :

CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Drilled Cast-in-place Pile Design Based on ACI 318-19

DESIGN CRITERIA
1. ASSUME FIX HEAD CONDITION IF Ldh & Lhk COMPLY WITH THE TENSION DEVELOPMENT. OTHERWISE PINNED AT TOP.

2. FROM PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS & REACTIONS, DETERMINE MAX SECTION FORCES OF SINGLE PILE, Pu, Mu, & Vu.

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4.5 ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 24 in
PILE LENGTH L = 35 ft
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD Pu = 100 k
FACTORED MOMENT LOAD Mu = 200 ft-k
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD Vu = 20 k
PILE VERT. REINF. 8 # 7
SEISMIC DESIGN (ACI 18.13.4) ? Yes
LATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 4 @ 6 in o.c.
(spacing 3.0 in o.c. at top end of 10.0 ft.)
(2018 IBC 1810.3.9 & ACI 18.13.4)

( Ldh = 11 in & Lhk = 16 in )

THE DESIGN IS INADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS
fc ' = 4.5 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory] (2018 IBC Table 1808.8.1)
D= 24 in > MAX( L / 30 , 12 in) [Satisfactory] (2018 IBC 1810.3.5.2)

CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY


     2
  f C'  2   c     c   , for 0   c   o  s E s , for  s   ty
e
 fC    o    o   , f S
 '
 f y , for  s   ty
  e f C , for  c   o

 
2  e f 'C  fy  ty , for compression controlled
o  ,  ty  , t  
Ec Es  ty  0.003 , for tension controlled
'
E c  57 f C , E s  29000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu  0.003

f Pmax =F f [ 0.85 fc' (Ag - Ast) + fy Ast] = 1040 kips., (at max axial load, ACI 318-19 22.4.2)
where F = 0.8 , ACI 318-19 22.4.2
f = 0.65 (ACI 318-19 21.2) > Pu [Satisfactory]
Ag = 452 in2. Ast = 4.80 in2.
(cont'd)

Note:
1. Between compression & tension controlled is
Transition, which the f should be by linear
f Pn (k) interpolation. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2.2 & Fig. R10.4.2.1)
500 2. ACI 318-19 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2b) and keeps
be (22.2.2.4.1) and ecu (Fig. R21.2.2a) the same.
But AISC 360/341-16 has different f (0.9 only) and
be (1.0 or 0.7).
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

f Mn (ft-k)
Solid Black Line - Tension Controlled
Solid Red Line - Transition
Dash Line - Compression Controlled

f Mn = 238 ft-kips @ Pu = 100 kips > Mu [Satisfactory]


r max = 0.06 (ACI 318-19 18.7.4.1) rprovd = 0.011
rmin = 0.01 (ACI 318-19 18.7.4.1& 10.6.1.1) [Satisfactory]

CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY


f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) = 92 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
> Vu [Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318-19 21.2)
A0 = 316 in2. Av = 0.40 in2. fy = 60 ksi
Vc = 2 (fc')0.5A0 = 42.4 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) = 80.3 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5.1)
smax = 10.5 (2018 IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) sprovd = 6 in
smin = 1 [Satisfactory]
rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = 0.009 > rs,provd = 0.008 [Unsatisfactory] (ACI 318-19 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

DETERMINE FIX HEAD CONDITION


  
requird  e d b f y
L dh  MAX  , 8d b , 6 in  
  provided 55 f '  13 db =
 c  11 in
(ACI 318-19 25.4.3)

Lhk = 16 in, (ACI 318-19 25.4)

where db = 0.875 in
r required / r provided = 1 ( A s,reqd / A s,provd , ACI 318-19 25.4.10.2)
ye = 1.0 (1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
l = 1.0 (normal weight)
h = 0.7 (#11 or smaller, cover > 2.5" & side >2.0",
ACI 318-19 25.4.3.2)

You might also like