Marginal Costing Icai Material

CHAPTER 14
MARGINAL COSTING
LEARNING OUTCOMES
 Explain the meaning and characteristics of Marginal Costing.

 Describe the meaning of CVP Analysis and apply the same in
making short-term managerial decisions.
 Describe the meaning and application of Break-even point,
Margin of safety, Angle of incidence etc. and apply the same
in making computations.
 Calculate and explain the various formulae used in CVP
analysis.
 Apply the concepts of marginal costing and CVP analysis in
short-term decision making.
 Differentiate between Marginal Costing and Absorption
Costing.
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

14.2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Meaning of Marginal Cost

and Marginal Costing
Break-even Analysis
Marginal Costing
Characteristics of Marginal
Costing
Marginal of Safety
Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP)
Analysis
Angle of Incidence
Short-term Decision
making
Contribution Ratio
14.1 INTRODUCTION
As discussed in the first chapter ‘Introduction to Cost and Management
Accounting’, the cost and management accounting system, by provision of
information, enables management to take various decisions. Marginal Costing is a
technique of cost and management accounting which is used to analyse
relationship between cost, volume and profit.
In order to appreciate the concept of marginal costing, it is necessary to study the
definition of marginal costing and certain other terms associated with this
technique. The important terms have been defined as follows:
1. Marginal Cost: Marginal cost as understood in economics is the incremental
cost of production which arises due to one-unit increase in the production
quantity. As we understood, variable costs have direct relationship with volume of
output and fixed costs remains constant irrespective of volume of production.
Hence, marginal cost is measured by the total variable cost attributable to one unit.
For example, the total cost of producing 10 units and 11 units of a product is
`10,000 and `10,500 respectively. The marginal cost for 11th unit i.e. 1 unit extra
from 10 units is `500.

MARGINAL COSTING 14.3
Marginal cost can precisely be the sum of prime cost and variable overhead.
Example 1: Arnav Ltd. produces 10,000 units of product Z by incurring a total cost
of ` 3,50,000. Break-up of costs are as follows:
(i) Direct Material @ ` 10 per unit, ` 1,00,000,
(ii) Direct employee (labour) cost @ ` 8 per unit, ` 80,000
(iii) Variable overheads @ `2 per unit, ` 20,000
(iv) Fixed overheads ` 1,50,000 (upto a volume of 50,000 units)
In this example, if Arnav Ltd. wants to know marginal cost of producing one extra
unit from the current production i.e. 10,001st unit. The marginal cost would be the
change in the total cost due production of this 10,001st extra unit. The extra cost
would be `20, as calculated below:
10,000 10,001 units Change in
units Cost
(A) (B) (c) = (B) - (A)
(i) Direct Material @ `10 per unit 1,00,000 1,00,010 10

(ii) Direct employee (labour) cost 80,000 80,008 8
@ `8 per unit
(iii)Variable overheads @ `2 per 20,000 20,002 2
unit
(iv) Fixed overheads 1,50,000 1,50,000 0
Total Cost 3,50,000 3,50,020 20
2. Marginal Costing: It is a costing system where products or services and

inventories are valued at variable costs only. It does not take consideration of
fixed costs. This system of costing is also known as direct costing as only direct
costs forms the part of product and inventory cost. Costs are classified on the basis
of behavior of cost (i.e. fixed and variable) rather functions as done in absorption
costing method.
3. Direct Costing: Direct costing and Marginal Costing is used synonymously at
various places. But the relation of costs with respect to activity level must be
understood. Some costs are variable at batch level but fixed for unit level whereas
others are variable at production line level but fixed for batches and units.

Example 2: Arnav Ltd. produces 10,000 units of product Z by incurring a total cost
of `4,80,000. Break-up of costs are as follows:
(i) Direct Material @ `10 per unit, `1,00,000,
(ii) Direct employee (labour) cost @ `8 per unit, `80,000
(iii) Variable overheads @ `2 per unit, `20,000
(iv) Machine set up cost @ `1,200 for a production run (100 units can be
manufactured in a run)
(v) Depreciation of a machine specifically used for production of Z `10,000
(iv) Apportioned fixed overheads `1,50,000.
Analysis of the costs:
10,000 10,001 Change in Direct Cost
units units Cost
(A) (B) (c) = (B) - (A)
(i) Direct Material 1,00,000 1,00,010 10 Unit level Direct
@ ` 10 per unit Cost.
(ii) Direct employee 80,000 80,008 8 Unit level Direct
(labour) cost @ Cost.
` 8 per unit
(iii) Variable 20,000 20,002 2 Unit level Direct
overheads @ `2 Cost.
per unit
(iv) Machine set up 1,20,000 1,21,200 1,200 Batch level Direct
cost Cost
(v) Depreciation of 10,000 10,000 0 Product level Direct
a machine Cost.
(vi) Apportioned 1,50,000 1,50,000 0 Department level
fixed overheads Direct Cost
Total Cost 4,80,000 4,81,220 1,220
In the example, the direct cost of producing 10,001st unit is 1,220 but it is not the
marginal cost of producing one extra unit rather marginal cost of running one extra
production run (batch).
4. Differential and Incremental Cost: Differential cost is difference between
the costs of two different production levels. It is a relative representation of

costs for two different levels that results in the increase or decrease in cost.
Incremental cost, on the other hand, is the increase in the costs due to change in
the volume or process of production activities. Incremental costs are sometime
compared with marginal cost but in reality, there is a thin line difference between
the two. Marginal cost is the change in the total cost due to production of one
extra unit while incremental cost can be both for increase in one unit or in total
volume. In the Example 2 above, ` 1,220 is the incremental cost of producing one
extra unit but not marginal cost for producing one extra unit.
14.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF MARGINAL COSTING

The technique of marginal costing is based on the distinction between product
costs and period costs. Only the variables costs are treated as the costs of the
products while the fixed costs are treated as period costs which will be incurred
during the period regardless of the volume of output. The main characteristics of
marginal costing are as follows:
1. All elements of cost are classified into fixed and variable components.
Semi-variable costs are also analyzed into fixed and variable elements.
2. The marginal or variable costs (as direct material, direct labour and variable
factory overheads) are treated as the cost of product.
3. Under marginal costing, the value of finished goods and work–in–progress
is also comprised only of marginal costs. Variable selling and distribution
are excluded for valuing these inventories. Fixed costs are not considered for
valuation of closing stock of finished goods and closing WIP.
4. Fixed costs are treated as period costs and are charged to profit and loss
account for the period for which they are incurred.
5. Prices are determined with reference to marginal costs and contribution margin.
6. Profitability of departments and products is determined with reference to
their contribution margin.
14.3 FACTS ABOUT MARGINAL COSTING

Some of the facts about marginal costing are depicted below:
Not a distinct method: Marginal costing is not a distinct method of costing like
job costing, process costing, operating costing, etc., but a special technique used
for managerial decision making. Marginal costing is used to provide a basis for the

interpretation of cost data to measure the profitability of different products,

processes and cost centres in the course of decision making. It can, therefore, be
used in conjunction with the different methods of costing such as job costing,
process costing, etc., or even with other techniques such as standard costing or
budgetary control.
Cost Ascertainment: In marginal costing, cost ascertainment is made on the basis of
the nature of cost. It gives consideration to behaviour of costs. In other words, the
technique has developed from a particular conception and expression of the nature
and behaviour of costs and their effect upon the profitability of an undertaking.
Decision Making: According to traditional or total cost method, as opposed to
marginal costing, the classification of costs is based on functional basis. Under this
method the total cost is the sum total of the cost of direct material, direct labour,
direct expenses, manufacturing overheads, administration overheads, selling and
distribution overheads. In this system, other things being equal, the total cost per
unit will remain constant only when the level of output or mixture is the same from
period to period. Since these factors are continually fluctuating, the actual total
cost will vary from one period to another. Thus, it is possible for the costing
department to say one day that an item costs `20 and the next day it costs `18.
This situation arises because of changes in volume of output and the peculiar
6ehavior of fixed expenses included in the total cost. Such fluctuating
manufacturing activity, and consequently the variations in the total cost from
period to period or even from day to day, poses a serious problem to the
management in taking sound decisions. Hence, the application of marginal costing
has been given wide recognition in the field of decision making.
14.4 DETERMINATION OF COST AND PROFIT

UNDER MARGINAL COSTING
For the determination of cost of a product or service under marginal costing, costs
are classified into variable and fixed. All the variable costs are part of product and
services while fixed costs are charged against contribution margin.
Cost and Profit Statement under Marginal Costing
Amount Amount (`)

(`)
Revenue (A) xxx

Product Cost:
- Direct Materials xxx
- Direct employee (labour) xxx
- Direct expenses xxx
- Variable manufacturing overheads xxx
Product (Inventoriable) Costs: (B) xxx xxx
Product Contribution Margin {A – B} xxx
- Variable Administration overheads xxx
- Variable Selling & Distribution overheads xxx xxx
Contribution Margin: (C) xxx
Period Cost: (D)
Fixed Manufacturing expenses xxx
Fixed non-manufacturing expenses xxx xxx
Profit/ (loss) {C – D} xxx
(i) Product (Inventoriable) Costs: In the case of merchandise inventory, these

are the costs which are associated with the purchase and sale of goods. In the
production scenario, such costs are associated with the acquisition and
conversion of materials and all other manufacturing inputs into finished
product for sale. Hence, under marginal costing, variable manufacturing costs
constitute inventoriable or product costs.
Finished goods are measured at product cost. Work-in-process (WIP) inventories
are also measured at product cost on the basis of percentage of completion (Please
refer Process & Operation costing chapter)
(ii) Contribution: Contribution or contribution margin is the difference between
sales revenue and total variable costs irrespective of manufacturing or non-
manufacturing.
Contribution (C) = Sales Revenue (S) – Total Variable Cost (V)
It is obtained by subtracting variable costs from sales revenue. It can also be

defined as excess of sales revenue over the variable costs. The contribution concept
is based on the theory that the profit and fixed expenses of a business is a ‘joint
cost’ which cannot be equitably apportioned to different segments of the business.
In view of this difficulty the contribution serves as a measure of efficiency of

operations of various segments of the business. The contribution forms a fund for
fixed expenses and profit as illustrated below:
Example:
Variable Cost = `50,000, Fixed Cost = ` 20,000,
Selling Price = ` 80,000
Contribution = Selling Price – Variable Cost
= ` 80,000 – ` 50,000 = ` 30,000
Profit = Contribution – Fixed Cost
= ` 30,000 – ` 20,000 = `10,000
Since, contribution exceeds fixed cost; the profit is of the magnitude of ` 10,000.
Suppose the fixed cost is ` 40,000 then the position shall be:
Contribution – Fixed cost = Profit or,
= ` 30,000 – ` 40,000 = - ` 10,000
The amount of `10,000 represent extent of loss since the fixed costs are more than
the contribution. At the level of fixed cost of `30,000, there shall be no profit and
no loss.
(iii) Period Cost: These are the costs, which are not assigned to the products
but are charged as expenses against the revenue of the period in which they
are incurred. All fixed costs either manufacturing or non-manufacturing are
recognised as period costs in marginal costing.
14.5 ABSORPTION COSTING

Absorption Costing is the practice of charging all costs, both variable and
fixed to operations, processes or product.
In absorption costing the classification of expenses is based on functional basis
whereas in marginal costing it is based on the nature of expenses. In absorption
costing, the fixed expenses are distributed over products on absorption costing basis
that is, based on a pre-determined level of output. Since fixed expenses are constant,
such a method of recovery will lead to over or under-recovery of expenses depending
on the actual output being greater or lesser than the estimate used for recovery. This
difficulty will not arise in marginal costing because the contribution is used as a fund
for meeting fixed expenses.

(For understanding the difference between marginal and absorption costing

along with the presentation of information to management under the said two
costing techniques, students are advised to refer Para 14.14)
14.6 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF

MARGINAL COSTING
ADVANTAGES
1. Simplified Pricing Policy: The marginal cost remains constant per unit of
output whereas the fixed cost remains constant in total. Since marginal cost
per unit is constant from period to period within a short span of time, firm
decisions on pricing policy can be taken. If fixed cost is included, the unit
cost will change from day to day depending upon the volume of output. This
will make decision making task difficult.
2. Proper recovery of Overheads: Overheads are recovered in costing on the
basis of pre-determined rates. If fixed overheads are included on the basis
of pre-determined rates, there will be under- recovery of overheads if
production is less or if overheads are more. There will be over- recovery of
overheads if production is more than the budget or actual expenses are less
than the estimate. This creates the problem of treatment of such under or
over-recovery of overheads. Marginal costing avoids such under or over
recovery of overheads.
3. Shows Realistic Profit: Advocates of marginal costing argues that under the
marginal costing technique, the stock of finished goods and work-in-progress
are carried on marginal cost basis and the fixed expenses are written off to
profit and loss account as period cost. This shows the true profit of the period.
4. How much to produce: Marginal costing helps in the preparation of break-
even analysis which shows the effect of increasing or decreasing production
activity on the profitability of the company.
5. More control over expenditure: Segregation of expenses as fixed and
variable helps the management to exercise control over expenditure. The
management can compare the actual variable expenses with the budgeted
variable expenses and take corrective action through analysis of variances.
6. Helps in Decision Making: Marginal costing helps the management in taking
a number of business decisions like make or buy, discontinuance of a
particular product, replacement of machines, etc.

7. Short term profit planning: It helps in short term profit planning by B.E.P
charts.
LIMITATIONS
1. Difficulty in classifying fixed and variable elements: It is difficult to
classify exactly the expenses into fixed and variable category. Most of the
expenses are neither totally variable nor wholly fixed. For example, various
amenities provided to workers may have no relation either to volume of
production or time factor.
2. Dependence on key factors: Contribution of a product itself is not a guide
for optimum profitability unless it is linked with the key factor.
3. Scope for Low Profitability: Sales staff may mistake marginal cost for total
cost and sell at a price; which will result in loss or low profits. Hence, sales
staff should be cautioned while giving marginal cost.
4. Faulty valuation: Overheads of fixed nature cannot altogether be excluded
particularly in large contracts, while valuing the work-in- progress. In order
to show the correct position fixed overheads have to be included in work-in-
progress.
5. Unpredictable nature of Cost: Some of the assumptions regarding the
behaviour of various costs are not necessarily true in a realistic situation. For
example, the assumption that fixed cost will remain static throughout is not
correct. Fixed cost may change from one period to another. For example,
salaries bill may go up because of annual increments or due to change in pay
rate etc. The variable costs do not remain constant per unit of output. There
may be changes in the prices of raw materials, wage rates etc. after a certain
level of output has been reached due to shortage of material, shortage of
skilled labour, concessions of bulk purchases etc.
6. Marginal costing ignores time factor and investment: The marginal cost
of two jobs may be the same but the time taken for their completion and the
cost of machines used may differ. The true cost of a job which takes longer
time and uses costlier machine would be higher. This fact is not disclosed by
marginal costing.
7. Understating of W-I-P: Under marginal costing stocks and work in progress
are understated.

14.7 COST-VOLUME-PROFIT (CVP) ANALYSIS

Meaning: It is a managerial tool showing the relationship between various ingredients
of profit planning viz., cost, selling price and volume of activity. As the name suggests,
cost volume profit (CVP) analysis is the analysis of three variables cost, volume and
profit. Such an analysis explores the relationship between costs, revenue, activity levels
and the resulting profit. It aims at measuring variations in cost and volume.
Assumptions:
1. Changes in the levels of revenues and costs arise only because of changes
in the number of product (or service) units produced and sold – for
example, the number of television sets produced and sold by Sony
Corporation or the number of packages delivered by Overnight Express. The
number of output units is the only revenue driver and the only cost driver.
Just as a cost driver is any factor that affects costs, a revenue driver is a
variable, such as volume, that causally affects revenues.
2. Total costs can be separated into two components; a fixed component that
does not vary with output level and a variable component that changes with
respect to output level. Furthermore, variable costs include both direct
variable costs and indirect variable costs of a product. Similarly, fixed costs
include both direct fixed costs and indirect fixed costs of a product
3. When represented graphically, the behaviours of total revenues and total
costs are linear (meaning they can be represented as a straight line) in
relation to output level within a relevant range (and time period).
4. Selling price, variable cost per unit, and total fixed costs (within a
relevant range and time period) are known and constant.
5. The analysis either covers a single product or assumes that the proportion
of different products when multiple products are sold will remain
constant as the level of total units sold changes.
6. All revenues and costs can be added, subtracted, and compared without
taking into account the time value of money. (Refer to the FM study
material for a clear understanding of time value of money).
Importance
It provides the information about the following matters:
1. The behavior of cost in relation to volume.
2. Volume of production or sales, where the business will break-even.

3. Sensitivity of profits due to variation in output.

4. Amount of profit for a projected sales volume.
5. Quantity of production and sales for a target profit level.
Impact of various changes on profit:
An understanding of CVP analysis is extremely useful to management in budgeting
and profit planning. It elucidates the impact of the following on the net profit:
(i) Changes in selling prices,
(ii) Changes in volume of sales,
(iii) Changes in variable cost,
(iv) Changes in fixed cost.
14.7.1 Marginal Cost Equation
The contribution theory explains the relationship between the variable cost and
selling price. It tells us that selling price minus variable cost of the units sold is the
contribution towards fixed expenses and profit. If the contribution is equal to fixed
expenses, there will be no profit or loss and if it is less than fixed expenses, loss is
incurred. Since the variable cost varies in direct proportion to output, therefore if
the firm does not produce any unit, the loss will be there to the extent of fixed
expenses. These points can be described with the help of following marginal cost
equation:
Marginal Cost Equation = S -V = C = F ± P

Where,
S = Selling price per unit, V = Variable cost per unit, C = Contribution,
F = Fixed Cost,
Marginal Cost Statement
(`)
Sales xxxx
Less: Variable Cost xxxx
Contribution xxxx
Less: Fixed Cost xxxx
Profit xxxx

14.7.2 Contribution to Sales Ratio (Profit Volume Ratio or P/V ratio)

This ratio shows the proportion of sales available to cover fixed costs and profit.
Contribution represent the sales revenue after deducting variable costs. This ratio
is usually expressed in percentage.
Contribution Change in contribution / Profit

P / V Ratio = ×100 or, P/V Ratio = ×100
Sales Change in sales
A higher contribution to sales ratio implies that the rate of growth of contribution
is faster than that of sales. This is because, once the breakeven point is reached,
profits shall grow at a faster rate when compared to a product with a lesser
contribution to sales ratio.
By transposition, we have derived the following equations:
(i) C = S × P/V ratio
C
(ii) S=
P / VRatio
14.7.3 Break-Even Analysis

Break-even analysis is a generally used method to study the CVP analysis. This
technique can be explained in two ways:
(i) In narrow sense it is concerned with computing the break-even point. At this
point of production level and sales there will be no profit and loss i.e. total
cost is equal to total sales revenue.
(ii) In broad sense this technique is used to determine the possible profit/loss at
any given level of production or sales.
14.8 METHODS OF BREAK -EVEN ANALYSIS

Break even analysis may be conducted by the following two methods:
(A) Algebraic computations
(B) Graphic presentations
(A) ALGEBRAIC CALCULATIONS
14.8.1 Breakeven Point
The word contribution has been given its name because of the fact that it literally
contributes towards the recovery of fixed costs and the making of profits. The

contribution grows along with the sales revenue till the time it just covers the fixed cost.
This is the point where neither profits nor losses have been made is known as a break-
even point. This implies that in order to break even the amount of contribution
generated should be exactly equal to the fixed costs incurred. Hence, if we know how
much contribution is generated from each unit sold we shall have sufficient information
for computing the number of units to be sold in order to break even. Mathematically,
Fixed costs
Break-even point in units =
Contributi on per unit
Example 3: ABC Ltd. manufacturing a single product, incurring variable costs of `

300 per unit and fixed costs of ` 2,00,000 per month. If the product sells for
` 500 per unit, the breakeven point shall be calculated as follows;
Fixed costs ` 2,00,000
Break- even point in units = = = 1,000 units
Contribution per unit `200
Total fixed cost

Break- even points (in Value) = × Sales
Contribution
Total fixed cost
Break- even point (in Value) =
P / V Ratio
14.8.2 Cash Break-even point
When break-even point is calculated only with those fixed costs which are payable
in cash, such a break-even point is known as cash break-even point. This means
that depreciation and other non-cash fixed costs are excluded from the fixed costs
in computing cash break-even point. Its formula is –
Cash fixed costs

Cash break- even point =
Contribution per unit
ILLUSTRATION 1
MNP Ltd sold 2,75,000 units of its product at ` 37.50 per unit. Variable costs are
` 17.50 per unit (manufacturing costs of ` 14 and selling cost ` 3.50 per unit). Fixed
costs are incurred uniformly throughout the year and amounting to ` 35,00,000
(including depreciation of ` 15,00,000). There are no beginning or ending inventories.
Required:
COMPUTE breakeven sales level quantity and cash breakeven sales level quantity.

SOLUTION
Fixed cost ` 35,00,000
Break even Sales Quantity = =
Contribution margin per unit `20
= 1,75,000 units
Cash Fixed Cost ` 20,00,000
Cash Break-even Sales Quantity = =
Contribution margin per unit `20
=1,00,000 units.
14.8.3 Multi- Product Break-even Analysis
In a multi-product environment, where more than one product is manufactured by
using a common fixed cost, the break-even point formula needs some adjustments.
The contribution is calculated by taking weights for the products. The weights
may be of sales mix quantity or sales mix values. The calculation of Multi-Product
Break-even analysis can be understood with the help of the following example.
Example 4: Arnav Ltd. sells two products, J and K. The sales mix is 4 units of J and
3 units of K. The contribution margins per unit are ` 40 for J and ` 20 for K. Fixed
costs are ` 6,16,000 per month.
Sales mix (in quantity) is 4 units of Product- J and 3 units of Product- K
i.e. Sales ratio is 4 : 3
Composite contribution per unit by taking weights for the product sales quantity
4 3
=Product J- ` 40 × + Product K- `20 × = `22.86 + `8.57 = `31.43
7 7
Common Fixed Cost `6,16,000
Composite Break-even point = =
Composite Contribution per unit `31.43
= 19,600 units
4
Break-even units of Product-J = 19,600 × = 11,200 units
7
3
Break-even units of Product- K = 19,600 × = 8,400 units
7

ILLUSTRATION 2
You are given the following particulars CALCULATE:

(a) Break-even point
(b) Sales to earn a profit of ` 20,000
i. Fixed cost ` 1,50,000
ii. Variable cost ` 15 per unit
iii. Selling price is ` 30 per unit
SOLUTION
Fixed cost `1,50,000
(a) Break-even point (BEP) = = = 10,000 Units
Contribution per unit * `15
* (Contribution per unit = Sales per unit – Variable cost per unit = ` 30 - `15)
(b) Sales to earn a Profit of ` 20,000:

Fixed cost+Desired profit
= ×Selling price per unit
Contribution per unit
`1,50,000+ `20,000
= ×`30 = ` 3,40,000
`15
Or
Fixed cost+Desired profit `1,70,000 `1,70,000
= = = ` 3, 40,000
P / V Ratio P / V Ratio 50%
Contributi on
PV Ratio = × 100
Sales
ILLUSTRATION 3
A company has a P/V ratio of 40%. COMPUTE by what percentage must sales be
increased to offset: 20% reduction in selling price?
SOLUTION
Desired Contribution 0.40
Revised Sales Value = = = 1.6
Revised P / VRatio * 0.25

This means sales value to be increased by 60% of the existing sales.

Revised Contribution 0.80- 0.60
*Revised P/V Ratio = = = 0.25
Revised Selling Price 0.80
Desired Contribution 0.40

Required Sales Quantity = = =2
Revised P / VRatio *×Revised Selling Price 0.25×0.80
Therefore, Sales value to be increased by 60% and sales quantity to be doubled to

offset the reduction in selling price.
Proof:
Let selling price per unit is `10 and sales quantity is 100 units.
Data before change in selling price:
(`)
Sales (`10 × 100 units) 1,000
Contribution (40% of 1,000) 400
Variable cost (balancing figure) 600
Data after the change in selling price:

Selling price is reduced by 20% that means it became `8 per unit. Since, we have
to maintain the earlier contribution margin i.e. `400 by increasing the sales quantity
only. Therefore, the target contribution will be `400.
The new P/V Ratio will be
(`)
Sales 8.00
Variable cost 6.00
Contribution per unit 2.00
P/V Ratio 25%
DesiredContribution `400
Sales Value = = = `1,600
Revised P / VRatio 0.25
Sales value `1,600
Sales quantity = = = 200 units
Selling price per unit `8

ILLUSTRATION 4
PQR Ltd. has furnished the following data for the two years:
2019 2020
Sales ` 8,00,000 ?
Profit/Volume Ratio (P/V ratio) 50% 37.5%
Margin of Safety sales as a % of total sales 40% 21.875%
There has been substantial savings in the fixed cost in the year 2020 due to the
restructuring process. The company could maintain its sales quantity level of 2019 in
2020 by reducing selling price.
You are required to CALCULATE the following:
(i) Sales for 2020 in Value,
(ii) Fixed cost for 2020 in Value,
(iii) Break-even sales for 2020 in Value.
SOLUTION
In 2019, PV ratio = 50%
Variable cost ratio = 100% - 50% = 50%
Variable cost in 2019 = ` 8,00,000 × 50% = ` 4,00,000
In 2020, sales quantity has not changed. Thus, variable cost in 2020 is ` 4,00,000.
In 2020, P/V ratio = 37.50%
Thus, Variable cost ratio = 100% − 37.5% = 62.5%
4,00,000
(i) Thus, sales in 2020 = = `6,40,000
62.5%
In 2020, Break-even sales = 100% − 21.875% (Margin of safety) = 78.125%
(ii) Break-even sales = 6,40,000 × 78.125% = ` 5,00,000
(iii) Fixed cost = B.E. sales × P/V ratio
= 5,00,000 × 37.50% = `1,87,500.

(B) GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF BREAK EVEN CHART

14.8.4 Break-even Chart
A breakeven chart records costs and revenues on the vertical axis and the level of
activity on the horizontal axis. The making of the breakeven chart would require
you to select appropriate axes. Subsequently, you will need to mark costs/revenues
on the Y axis whereas the level of activity shall be traced on the X axis. Lines
representing (i) Fixed costs (horizontal line at ` 2,00,000 for ABC Ltd), (ii) Total costs
at maximum level of activity (joined to the Y-axis where the Fixed cost of ` 2,00,000
is marked) and (iii) Revenue at maximum level of activity (joined to the origin) shall
be drawn next.
The breakeven point is that point where the sales revenue line intersects the total
cost line. Other measures like the margin of safety and profit can also be measured
from the chart.
The breakeven chart for ABC Ltd (Example-3) is drawn below.
` 000
14.8.5 Contribution Breakeven chart

It is not possible to use a breakeven chart as described above to measure
contribution. This is one of its major limitations especially so because contribution
analysis is literally the backbone of marginal costing. To overcome such a limitation,
accountants frequently resort to the making of a contribution breakeven chart
which is based on the same principles as a conventional breakeven chart except for
that it shows the variable cost line instead of the fixed cost line. Lines for Total cost
and Sales revenue remain the same. The breakeven point and profit can be read off
in the same way as with a conventional chart. However, it is also possible to read
the contribution for any level of activity.

Using the same example of ABC Ltd as for the conventional chart, the total variable
cost for an output of 1,700 units is 1,700 × `300 = `5,10,000. This point can be
joined to the origin since the variable cost is nil at zero activity.
` 000
The contribution can be read as the difference between the sales revenue line and
the variable cost line.
14.8.6 Profit-volume chart
This is also very similar to a breakeven chart. In this chart the vertical axis represents
profits and losses and the horizontal axis is drawn at zero profit or loss.
In this chart each level of activity is taken into account and profits marked
accordingly. The breakeven point is where this line interacts the horizontal axis. A
profit-volume graph for our example (ABC Ltd) will be as follows,
` 000
Loss

The loss at a nil activity level is equal to ` 2,00,000, i.e. the amount of fixed costs.
The second point used to draw the line could be the calculated breakeven point or
the calculated profit for sales of 1,700 units.
Advantages of the profit-volume chart
1. The biggest advantage of the profit-volume chart is its capability of depicting
clearly the effect on profit and breakeven point of any changes in the variables.
The following example illustrates this characteristic,
Example 5:
A manufacturing company incurs fixed costs of `3,00,000 per annum. It is a single
product company with annual sales budgeted to be 70,000 units at a sales price of
`300 per unit. Variable costs are `285 per unit.
(i) Draw a profit volume graph, and use it to determine the breakeven point.
The company is deliberating upon an increase in the selling price of the
product to `350 per unit. This shall be required in order to improve the quality
of the product. It is anticipated that despite increase in the selling price the
sales volume shall remain unaffected, however, the fixed costs shall increase
to `4,50,000 per annum and the variable costs to `330 per unit.
(ii) Draw on the same graph as for part (a) a second profit volume graph and give
your comments.
Solution
Figure showing changes with a profit-volume chart
` 000

Working notes (i)

The profit for sales of 70,000 units is ` 7,50,000.
(`’000)
Contribution 70,000 × (`300 – `285) 1050
Fixed costs 300
Profit 750
This point is joined to the loss at zero activity, ` 3,00,000 i.e., the fixed costs.
Working notes (ii)
The profit for sales of 70,000 units is ` 9,50,000.
(`’000)
Contribution 70,000 × (`350 – `330) 1400
Fixed costs 450
Profit 950
This point is joined to the loss at zero activity, ` 4,50,000 i.e., the fixed costs.
Comments:
It is clear from the graph that there are larger profits available from option (ii). It
also shows an increase in the break-even point from 20,000 units to 22,500 units,
however, the increase of 2,500 units may not be considered large in view of the
projected sales volume. It is also possible to see that for sales volumes above
30,000 units the profit achieved will be higher with option (ii). For sales volumes
below 30,000 units option (i) will yield higher profits (or lower losses).
ILLUSTRATION 5
You are given the following data for the year 2020 of Rio Co. Ltd:
Variable cost 60,000 60%

Fixed cost 30,000 30%
Net profit 10,000 10%
Sales 1,00,000 100%
FIND OUT (a) Break-even point, (b) P/V ratio, and (c) Margin of safety. Also DRAW
a break-even chart showing contribution and profit.

SOLUTION
Sales - Variable Cost 1,00,000 - 60,000
P / V ratio = = = 40%
Sales 1,00,000
Fixed Cost 30,000
Break Even Point = = = ` 75,000
P / V ratio 40%
Margin of safety = Actual Sales – BE point = 1,00,000 – 75,000 = ` 25,000
Break even chart showing contribution is shown below:
Cost and Revenue (` thousands)
Break-even chart
ILLUSTRATION 6
PREPARE a profit graph for products A, B and C and find break-even point from the
following data:
Products A B C Total
Sales (`) 7,500 7,500 3,750 18,750
Variable cost (`) 1,500 5,250 4,500 11,250
Fixed cost (`) --- --- --- 5,000

SOLUTION
Statement Showing Cumulative Sales & Profit
Sales Cumulative Variable Contributio Cumulative Cumulative

Sales Cost n Contribution Profit
(`) (`) (`) (`) (`) (`)
A 7,500 7,500 1,500 6,000 6,000 1,000
B 7,500 15,000 5,250 2,250 8,250 3,250
C 3,750 18,750 4,500 (750) 7,500 2,500
Profit in `
(+) 5,000
`3,250
(+) 2,500 `2,500
`1,000
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,00012,500 15,000 17,500 20,000

BEP Sales in `
(-) 2,500
Profit Line
(-) 5,000
Loss in `
Break Even Point (BEP) = ` 12,500
14.9 LIMITATIONS OF BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS

The limitations of the practical applicability of breakeven analysis and
breakeven charts stem mostly from the assumptions underlying CVP which
have been mentioned above. Assumptions like costs behaving in a linear fashion
or sales revenue remain constant at different sales levels or the stocks shall remain
constant period after period are unrealistic. Similarly, the assumption that the only
factor which influences costs is the ‘activity level achieved’ is erroneous because
other factors like inflation also have a bearing on costs.

14.10 MARGIN OF SAFETY

The margin of safety can be defined as the difference between the expected level
of sale and the breakeven sales. The larger the margin of safety, the higher is the
chances of making profits. In the Example-3 if the forecast sale is 1,700 units per
month, the margin of safety can be calculated as follows,
Margin of Safety = Projected sales – Breakeven sales
= 1,700 units – 1,000 units
= 700 units or 41% of sales.
The Margin of Safety can also be calculated by identifying the difference between
the projected sales and breakeven sales in units multiplied by the contribution per
unit. This is possible because, at the breakeven point all the fixed costs are
recovered and any further contribution goes into the making of profits. It also can
be calculated as:
Profit
Margin of Safety =
P / V Ratio
ILLUSTRATION 7
A company earned a profit of ` 30,000 during the year 2020. If the marginal cost and
selling price of the product are ` 8 and ` 10 per unit respectively, FIND OUT the
amount of margin of safety.
SOLUTION
Selling price- Variable cost per unit `10- `8
P/V ratio = = = 20%
Selling price `10
Profit 30,000
Margin of safety = = = ` 1,50,000
P/V ratio 20%
ILLUSTRATION 8
A Ltd. Maintains margin of safety of 37.5% with an overall contribution to sales ratio
of 40%. Its fixed costs amount to ` 5 lakhs.
CALCULATE the following:
i. Break-even sales
ii. Total sales

iii. Total variable cost

iv. Current profit
v. New ‘margin of safety’ if the sales volume is increased by 7 ½ %.
SOLUTION
(i) We know that: Break- even Sales (BES) × P/V Ratio = Fixed Cost
Break-even Sales (BES) × 40% = ` 5,00,000
Break- even Sales (BES) = ` 12,50,000
(ii) Total Sales (S) = Break Even Sales + Margin of Safety
S = ` 12,50,000 + 0.375S
Or, S – 0.375S = ` 12,50,000
Or, S = ` 20,00,000
(iii) Contribution to Sales Ratio = 40%
Therefore, Variable cost to Sales Ratio = 60%
Variable cost = 60% of sales = 60% of 20,00,000
Variable cost = 12,00,000
(iv) Current Profit = Sales – (Variable Cost + Fixed Cost)
= ` 20,00,000 – (12,00,000 + 5,00,000) = ` 3,00,000
(v) If sales value is increased by 7 ½ %
New Sales value = ` 20,00,000 × 1.075 = ` 21,50,000
New Margin of Safety = New Sales value – BES
= ` 21,50,000 – ` 12,50,000 = ` 9,00,000

14.11 VARIATIONS OF BASIC MARGINAL COST

EQUATION AND OTHER FORMULAE
i. Sales – Variable cost = Fixed cost ± Profit/ Loss
By multiplying and dividing L.H.S. by S
S(S − V)
ii. = F+P
S
 S−V
iii. S × P/V Ratio = F + P or Contribution  P/V Ratio = 
 S 
iv BES × P/V Ratio = F ( at BEP profit is zero)
Fixed Cost
v BES =
P / V Ratio
Fixedcost
vi P/V Ratio =
BES
vii S × P/V Ratio = Contribution (Refer to iii)
Contributi on
viii P/V Ratio =
Sales
ix (BES + MS) × P/V Ratio = Contribution (Total sales = BES + MS)
x (BES × P/V Ratio) + (MS × P/V Ratio) = F + P
By deducting (BES × P/V Ratio) from L.H.S. and F from R.H.S. in (x) above,
we get:
xi M.S. × P/V Ratio = P
Change in profit
xii P/V Ratio =
Change in sales
Change in contribution
xiii P/V Ratio =
Change in sales
Contributi on
xiv Profitability =
Key factor
Profit
xv Margin of Safety = Total Sales – BES or .
P / V ratio

Xvi BES = Total Sales – MS

Total sales - BES
Margin of Safety Ratio =
Total sales
ILLUSTRATION 9
By noting “P/V will increase or P/V will decrease or P/V will not change”, as the case
may be, STATE how the following independent situations will affect the P/V ratio:
(i) An increase in the physical sales volume;
(ii) An increase in the fixed cost;
(iii) A decrease in the variable cost per unit;
(iv) A decrease in the contribution margin;
(v) An increase in selling price per unit;
(vi) A decrease in the fixed cost;
(vii) A 10% increase in both selling price and variable cost per unit;
(viii) A 10% increase in the selling price per unit and 10% decrease in the physical
sales volume;
(ix) A 50% increase in the variable cost per unit and 50% decrease in the fixed cost.
(x) An increase in the angle of incidence.
SOLUTION
Item no. P/V Ratio Reason

(i) Will not change
(ii) Will not change
(iii) Will increase
(iv) Will decrease
(v) Will increase
(vi) Will not change
(vii) Will not change Reasoning 1
(viii) Will increase Reasoning 2
(ix) Will decrease Reasoning 3
(x) Will increase Reasoning 4

A 10% increase in both selling price and variable cost per unit.
Reasoning 1. Assumptions: a) Variable cost is less than selling price.
b) Selling price `100 variable cost ` 90 per unit.
100 − 90
c) P/V ratio = = 10%
100
10% increase in S.P. = `110
10% increase in variable cost = `99
110 − 99
P/V ratio = = 10% i.e. P/v ratio will not change
10
Reasoning 2. Increase or decrease in physical sales volume will not change P/V
ratio. Hence 10% increase in selling price per unit will increase P/V
ratio.
Reasoning 3. Increase or decrease in fixed cost will not change P/V ratio. Hence
50% increase in the variable cost per unit will decrease P/V ratio.
Reasoning 4. Angle of incidence is the angle at which sales line cuts the total cost
line. If it is large, it indicates that the profits are being made at higher
rate. Hence increase in the angle of incidence will increase the P/V
ratio.
14.12 ANGLE OF INCIDENCE

This angle is formed by the intersection of sales line and total cost line at the break-
even point. This angle shows the rate at which profit is earned once the break-
even point is reached. The wider the angle the greater is the rate of earning
profits. A large angle of incidence with a high margin of safety indicates extremely
favourable position.
The shaded area in the graph given below is representing the angle of incidence.
The angle above and below the break-even point shows the rate of earning
profitability (loss). Wider angle denotes higher rate of earnings and vice-versa.

280
L ine
les
260
Sa
240
220
200
ea
it Ar
180 of
Pr Line
Cost and Sales (Rs. ‘ 000)
C ost
Margin Angle of Total
Cost and Sales (` '000)
160 of incidence
Safety Break even point
140
120 Variable cost
100
80
ea
Ar
60 oss
L
40 Margin
of Fixed cost
20 Safety
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
B.E.sales Actual sales

Volume of sales (Unit ‘000)
14.13 APPLICATION OF CVP ANALYSIS IN

DECISION MAKING
As discussed earlier CVP analysis is used as an evaluation tool for managerial decisions.
In this chapter we will discuss the use of CVP Analysis for short term decision making.
Before going into illustration, let us discuss the decision making framework.
14.13.1 Framework for Decision Making
Step 1: Identification of Problem
Step 2: Indentification of Options
Step 3: Evaluation of the Options
Step 4: Selection of the Option

Step-1: Identification of Problem

Every organisation has its own objectives, and goals are set to achieve these
objectives. To reach at the goal, actions are to be taken. For example, if an
organisation wants to be a cost leader in the industry it operates in, it has to achieve
3Es in its all activities. 3Es means economy in inputs, efficiency in process and
operations and effectiveness in output. An entity that exists for profit may identify
few areas (problem areas) which if worked on can add to the profit or wealth
maximisation. For example, Arnav Ltd. a manufacturer of Steel products, has
identified that it can be leader in the industry if it can produce steel products at
lower cost than its rival. Here the goal should be (problem area) low cost
production.
Step- 2: Identification of Options
After identification of problem(s), the next step is identification of options to
achieve the goal (to answer the problem). Every possible options need to be
explored. In the above example, the Arnav Ltd. may have the following options for
low cost production:
(a) Purchase of inputs from specialised market- Local vs Import
(b) Make the input in its own factory- Make or Buy
(c) Bulk purchase to avail discount offer- How much to purchase
(d) Make in-house- Make vs Outsource
(e) Bulk processing- How much to produce
(f) Using efficient machine for manufacturing- Old machine vs New machine
(g) Optimisation of key resources- Product mix decisions etc.
Step- 3: Evaluation of the Options
After identification of options, each option is to be evaluated against the objective
criteria. An entity with objective of making profit may evaluate options on the basis
of financial measures like impact of profit or loss, market share, overall impact on
profitability, return on investment etc. Non-financial factors like customer
satisfaction, impact on existing market/ customer, ethics of decision are also
evaluated.
This step is a very important and may be grouped into two tasks
(i) Identification of Cost and Benefits of each options
(ii) Estimation of amount of each options

Step-4: Selection of option:

After evaluation of the options, the best option is selected and implemented.
14.13.2 Principles for Identification of Cost and Benefits for
measurement
The cost and benefit of an option is identified for measurement if it passes the
principles of Controllability and Relevance.
(i) Controllability: Those cost and benefits which arise due to choice of an
option. In other words, benefits received and cost incurred are directly related with
the choice of the option. Thus, the costs and benefits which are controllable are
considered for measurement for making decision.
(ii) Relevance: The costs which are controllable need to be relevant for decision
making. This means all controllable costs are not relevant for decision making
unless it differs under the two options. Thus, a cost is treated is relevant only if
(a) it is a future cost and (b) it differs under two options under consideration.
For Example, Arnav Ltd. wants to manufacture 1,000 additional units of Product X.
It is considering either to manufacture in its own factory or to outsource to job
workers. In this example cost of raw materials to manufacture additional 1,000 units
is controllable as it arises due to management’s decision to make additional units.
But it is not relevant for making choice between manufacturing in-house and
outsource to job workers, as under the both options, the raw materials cost would
be same.
Hence, for decision making purpose only those cost and benefits are identified for
measurement which are both Controllable and Relevant.
Below is an analysis of few costs for its relevance:
Cost Relevance Reason

(i) Historical Irrelevant The cost has already been incurred and do
Cost not affect the decision. Example: Book value
of machinery etc.
(ii) Sunk Cost Irrelevant The cost which are already paid either for
goods or services availed or to be availed.
Example: Raw material purchased and held
in store without having replacement cost,
Cost of drawing, blueprint etc.

(iii) Committed Irrelevant The committed costs are the pre-agreed

Cost cost which cannot be revoked under the
normal circumstances. This is also a sunk
cost. Examples: Cost of materials as per rate
agreement, Salary cost to employees etc.
(iv) Opportunity Relevant The opportunity cost is represented by the
Cost forgone potential benefit from the best
rejected course of action. Had the option
under consideration not chosen, the benefit
would come to the organisation.
(v) Notional or Relevant Notional costs are relevant for the decision
Imputed Cost making only if company is actually forgoing
benefits by employing its resources to
alternative course of action. For example,
notional interest on internally generated
fund is treated as relevant notional cost only
if company could earn interest from it.
(vi) Shut-down Relevant When an organization suspends its
Cost manufacturing operations, certain fixed
expenses can be avoided and certain extra
fixed expenses may be incurred depending
upon the nature of the industry. By closing
down the manufacturing, the organization
will save variable cost of production as well
as some discretionary fixed costs. This
particular discretionary cost is known as
shut-down cost.
14.13.3 Principles of Estimation of Costs and Benefits

After identification of the costs and benefits, it is now required to be quantified i.e.
the cost and benefit should be measured and estimated. The estimation is done by
following the two principles as discusses below:
(i) Variability: Variability means by how much a cost or benefit increased or
decreased due to the choice of the option. Variable costs are the cost which differs
under the different volume or activities. On the other hand, fixed costs remain same
irrespective of volume and activities.

(ii) Traceability: Traceability of cost means degree of relationship between the

cost and the choice of the option. Direct costs are directly assigned to the option
on the other hand indirect costs needs to be apportioned to the option on some
reasonable basis.
For Example, Arnav Ltd. wants to manufacture 1,000 units of Product X. It is
considering to manufacture the same in its own factory. To manufacture in its own
factory it requires 1,000 hours of employees and a specialised machine. In this
example, employee cost for labour of 1,000 hours is variable cost for in-house
manufacturing and it is directly traceable. Cost of machinery is also direct cost but
so far as traceability of the machinery cost is concerned it is direct cost for 1,000
units as a whole but indirect cost for a unit.
Hence, the cost and benefits of an option is measured at directly traceable and
variable costs.
14.13.4 Short-term Decision Making using concepts of CVP Analysis
Management uses marginal costing and CVP concepts for making various
decisions. In this chapter we will learn how the concepts of marginal costing and
CVP is applied for analysis of identified options for short-term decision making.
Generally, short-term decisions are related with temporary gaps between demand
and supply for available resources. The areas of short term decision may be
classified into two broad categories:
(i) Decisions related with excess supply, such as:
(a) Processing of Special Order
(b) Determination of price for stimulating demand
(c) Local vs Export sale
(d) Determination of minimum price for price quotations
(e) Shut-down or continue decision etc.
(ii) Decisions related with excess demand, such as:
(a) Make or Buy/ In-house-processing vs Outsourcing
(b) Product mix decision under resource constraints (limiting factors)
(c) Sales mix decisions
(d) Sale or further processing etc.

What is a Limiting Factor? Limiting factor is anything which limits the activity of
an entity. The factor is a key to determine the level of sale and production, thus it
is also known as Key factor. From the supply side the limiting factor may either be
Men (employees), Materials (raw material or supplies), Machine (capacity), or
Money (availability of fund or budget) and from demand side it may be demand
for the product, other factors like nature of product, regulatory and environmental
requirement etc. The management, while making decisions, has objective to
optimise the key resources upto maximum possible extent.
ILLUSTRATION 10
A company can make any one of the 3 products X, Y or Z in a year. It can exercise its
option only at the beginning of each year.
Relevant information about the products for the next year is given below.
X Y Z
Selling Price (` / unit) 10 12 12
Variable Costs (` / unit) 6 9 7
Market Demand (unit) 3,000 2,000 1,000
Production Capacity (unit) 2,000 3,000 900
Fixed Costs (`) 30,000
Required
COMPUTE the opportunity costs for each of the products.
SOLUTION
X Y Z
I. Contribution per unit (`) 4 3 5

II. Units (Lower of Production / Market Demand) 2,000 2,000 900
III. Possible Contribution (`) [ I × II ] 8,000 6,000 4,500
IV. Opportunity Cost* (`) 6,000 8,000 8,000
(*) Opportunity cost is the maximum possible contribution forgone by not producing
alternative product i.e. if Product X is produced then opportunity cost will be maximum of
(` 6,000 from Y, ` 4,500 from Z).

ILLUSTRATION 11
M.K. Ltd. manufactures and sells a single product X whose selling price is ` 40 per
unit and the variable cost is ` 16 per unit.
(i) If the Fixed Costs for this year are ` 4,80,000 and the annual sales are at 60%
margin of safety, CALCULATE the rate of net return on sales, assuming an
income tax level of 40%
(ii) For the next year, it is proposed to add another product line Y whose selling
price would be ` 50 per unit and the variable cost ` 10 per unit. The total fixed
costs are estimated at ` 6,66,600. The sales mix of X : Y would be 7 : 3.
DETERMINE at what level of sales next year, would M.K. Ltd. break even? Give
separately for both X and Y the break-even sales in rupee and quantities.
SOLUTION
(i) Contribution per unit = Selling price – Variable cost
= `40 – `16 = `24
` 4,80,000
Break-even Point = = 20,000 units
`24
Actual Sales – Break - even Sales
Percentage Margin of Safety =
Actual Sales
Actual Sales – 20,000units

Or, 60% =
Actual Sales
∴ Actual Sales = 50,000 units
(`)
Sales Value (50,000 units × `40) 20,00,000
Less: Variable Cost (50,000 units × `16) 8,00,000
Contribution 12,00,000
Less: Fixed Cost 4,80,000
Profit 7,20,000
Less: Income Tax @ 40% 2,88,000
Net Return 4,32,000
 ` 4,32,000 
Rate of Net Return on Sales = 21.6%  ×100 
 `20,00,000 

(ii) Products
X Y
(`) (`)
Selling Price 40 50
Less: Variable Cost 16 10
Contribution per unit 24 40
Sales Ratio 7 3
Contribution in sales Ratio 168 120
Based on Weighted Contribution
24 ×7 + 40 ×3
Weighted Contribution = = ` 28.8 per unit
10
Total Fixed Cost 6,66,600
Total Break-even Point = = = 23,145.80 units
Weighted Cost 28.80
Break-even Point
7
X = ×23,145.80 = 16,202 units
10
or 16,202 × ` 40 = ` 6,48,080
3
Y = ×23,145.80 = 6,944 units or 6,944 × ` 50 =` 3, 47,200
10
Based on distributing fixed cost in the weighted Contribution Ratio
Fixed Cost
168
X = ×6,66,600 = ` 3,88,850
288
120
Y = ×6,66,600 = ` 2,77,750
288
Break-even Point
Fixed Cost 3,88,850
X = = = 16,202 units or ` 6, 48,000
Contribution per unit 24
Fixed Cost 2,77,750
Y = = = 6,944 units or ` 3, 47,200
Contribution per unit 40

ILLUSTRATION 12
X Ltd. supplies spare parts to an air craft company Y Ltd. The production capacity of
X Ltd. facilitates production of any one spare part for a particular period of time. The
following are the cost and other information for the production of the two different
spare parts A and B:
Part A Part B
Per unit
Alloy usage 1.6 kgs. 1.6 kgs.
Machine Time: Machine P 0.6 hrs 0.25 hrs.
Machine Time: Machine Q 0.5 hrs. 0.55 hrs.
Target Price (`) 145 115
Total hours available Machine P 4,000 hours
Machine Q 4,500 hours
Alloy available is 13,000 kgs. @ ` 12.50 per kg.

Variable overheads per machine hours Machine P: ` 80
Machine Q: ` 100
Required
(i) IDENTIFY the spare part which will optimize contribution at the offered price.
(ii) If Y Ltd. reduces target price by 10% and offers ` 60 per hour of unutilized
machine hour, CALCULATE the total contribution from the spare part
identified above?
SOLUTION
(i)
Part A Part B
Machine “P” (4,000 hrs) 6,666 16,000
Machine “Q” (4,500 hrs) 9,000 8,181
Alloy Available (13,000 kg.) 8,125 8,125
Maximum Number of Parts to be manufactured 6,666 8,125
(Minimum of the above three)

(`) (`)
Material (`12.5 × 1.6 kg.) 20.00 20.00
Variable Overhead: Machine “P” 48.00 20.00
Variable Overhead: Machine “Q” 50.00 55.00
Total Variable Cost per unit 118.00 95.00
Price Offered 145.00 115.00
Contribution per unit 27.00 20.00
Total Contribution for units produced …(I) 1,79,982 1,62,500
Spare Part A will optimize the contribution.
(ii)
Part A
Parts to be manufactured numbers 6,666
Machine P : to be used 4,000
Machine Q : to be used 3,333
Underutilized Machine Hours (4,500 hrs. – 3,333 hrs.) 1,167
Compensation for unutilized machine hours (1,167hrs. × `60) (II) 70,020
Reduction in Price by 10%, Causing fall in Contribution of `14.50 96,657
per unit (6,666 units × `14.5) (III)
Total Contribution (I + II – III) 1,53,345
ILLUSTRATION 13
The profit for the year of R.J. Ltd. works out to 12.5% of the capital employed and the
relevant figures are as under:
Sales……………………………………………………………… ` 5,00,000
Direct Materials………………………………………………… ` 2,50,000
Direct Labour…………………………………………………….. ` 1,00,000
Variable Overheads…………………………………………… ` 40,000
Capital Employed……………………………………………… ` 4,00,000
The new Sales Manager who has joined the company recently estimates for next year
a profit of about 23% on capital employed, provided the volume of sales is increased
by 10% and simultaneously there is an increase in Selling Price of 4% and an overall
cost reduction in all the elements of cost by 2%.
Required
FIND OUT by computing in detail the cost and profit for next year, whether the
proposal of Sales Manager can be adopted.

SOLUTION
Statement Showing “Cost and Profit for the Next Year”
Particulars Existing Volume, Costs, etc. Estimated Sale,
Volume, etc. after 10% Increase Cost, Profit, etc.*
(`) (`) (`)
Sales 5,00,000 5,50,000 5,72,000
Less: Direct Materials 2,50,000 2,75,000 2,69,500
Direct Labour 1,00,000 1,10,000 1,07,800
Variable Overheads 40,000 44,000 43,120
Contribution 1,10,000 1,21,000 1,51,580
Less: Fixed Cost #
60,000 60,000 58,800
Profit 50,000 61,000 92,780
(*) for the next year after increase in selling price @ 4% and overall cost reduction by 2%.
(#) Fixed Cost = Existing Sales – Existing Marginal Cost – 12.5% on `4,00,000
= `5,00,000 – `3,90,000 – `50,000 = `60,000
 `92,780 
Percentage Profit on Capital Employed equals to 23.19%  x 100 
 ` 4,00,000 
Since the Profit of `92,780 is more than 23% of capital employed, the proposal of
the Sales Manager can be adopted.
14.14 DISTINCTION BETWEEN MARGINAL AND

ABSORPTION COSTING
The distinctions in these two techniques are illustrated by the following diagrams:
Absorption Costing Approach

Marginal Costing Approach

14.14.1 The main points of distinction between marginal costing and
absorption costing are as below:
Marginal costing Absorption costing

1. Only variable costs are Both fixed and variable costs are
considered for product costing considered for product costing and
and inventory valuation. inventory valuation.
2. Fixed costs are regarded as Fixed costs are charged to the cost of
period costs. The Profitability production. Each product bears a
of different products is judged reasonable share of fixed cost and thus the
by their P/V ratio. profitability of a product is influenced by the
apportionment of fixed costs.
3. Cost data presented highlight Cost data are presented in conventional
the total contribution of each pattern. Net profit of each product is
product. determined after subtracting fixed cost
along with their variable costs.
4. The difference in the magnitude The difference in the magnitude of
of opening stock and closing opening stock and closing stock affects
stock does not affect the unit the unit cost of production due to the
cost of production. impact of related fixed cost.
5. In case of marginal costing the In case of absorption costing the cost per
cost per unit remains the same, unit reduces, as the production increases
irrespective of the production as it is fixed cost which reduces, whereas,
as it is valued at variable cost the variable cost remains the same per
unit.

14.14.2 Difference in profit under Marginal and Absorption costing

The above two approaches will compute the different profit because of the difference
in the stock valuation. This difference is explained as follows in different circumstances.
1. No opening and closing stock: In this case, profit / loss under absorption
and marginal costing will be equal.
2. When opening stock is equal to closing stock: In this case, profit / loss
under two approaches will be equal provided the fixed cost element in both
the stocks is same amount.
3. When closing stock is more than opening stock: In other words, when
production during a period is more than sales, then profit as per absorption
approach will be more than that by marginal approach. The reason behind
this difference is that a part of fixed overhead included in closing stock value
is carried forward to next accounting period.
4. When opening stock is more than the closing stock: In other words, when
production is less than the sales, profit shown by marginal costing will be
more than that shown by absorption costing. This is because a part of fixed
cost from the preceding period is added to the current year’s cost of goods
sold in the form of opening stock.
The presentation of information to management under the two costing techniques
is as under:
Income Statement (Absorption costing)
(` )
Sales XXXXX
Production Costs:
Direct material consumed XXXXX
Direct labour cost XXXXX
Variable manufacturing overhead XXXXX
Fixed manufacturing overhead XXXXX
Cost of Production XXXXX
Add: Opening stock of finished goods XXXXX
(Value at cost of previous period’s production)
XXXXX

Less: Closing stock of finished goods XXXXX

(Value at production cost of current period) .
Cost of Goods Sold XXXXX
Add: (or less) Under (or over) absorption of fixed
Manufacturing overhead XXXXX
Add: Administration costs XXXXX
Selling and distribution costs XXXXX XXXXX
Total Cost XXXXX
Profit (Sales – Total cost) XXXXX
Income Statement (Marginal costing)
(` )
Sales XXXXX
Variable manufacturing costs:
– Direct material consumed XXXXX
– Direct labour XXXXX
– Variable manufacturing overhead XXXXX
Cost of Goods Produced XXXXX
Add: Opening stock of finished goods XXXXX
(Value at cost of previous period)
Less: Closing stock of finished goods (Value at current variable
cost)
Cost of Goods Sold XXXXX
Add: Variable administration, selling and dist. overhead XXXXX
Total Variable Cost XXXXX
Add: Selling and distribution costs
Contribution (Sales – Total variable costs) XXXXX
Less: Fixed costs (Production, admin., selling and dist.) XXXXX
Net Profit XXXXX

It is evident from the above that under marginal costing technique the
contributions of various products are pooled together and the fixed overheads are
met out of such total contribution. The total contribution is also known as gross
margin. The contribution minus fixed expenses yields net profit. In absorption
costing technique cost includes fixed overheads as well.
ILLUSTRATION 14
Wonder Ltd. manufactures a single product, ZEST. The following figures relate to ZEST
for a one-year period:
Activity Level 50% 100%

Sales and production (units) 400 800
(`) (`)
Sales 8,00,000 16,00,000
Production costs:
- Variable 3,20,000 6,40,000
- Fixed 1,60,000 1,60,000
Selling and distribution costs:
- Variable 1,60,000 3,20,000
- Fixed 2,40,000 2,40,000
The normal level of activity for the year is 800 units. Fixed costs are incurred evenly
throughout the year, and actual fixed costs are the same as budgeted. There were no
stocks of ZEST at the beginning of the year.
In the first quarter, 220 units were produced and 160 units were sold.
Required:
(a) COMPUTE the fixed production costs absorbed by ZEST if absorption costing is
used?
(b) CALCULATE the under/over-recovery of overheads during the period?
(c) CALCULATE the profit using absorption costing?
(d) CALCULATE the profit using marginal costing?

SOLUTION
(a) Fixed production costs absorbed: (` )
Budgeted fixed production costs 1,60,000
Budgeted output (normal level of activity 800 units)
Therefore, the absorption rate: 1,60,000/800 = ` 200 per unit
During the first quarter, the fixed production
cost absorbed by ZEST would be (220 units × ` 200) 44,000
(b) Under /over-recovery of overheads during the period: (` )
Actual fixed production overhead 40,000
(1/4 of ` 1,60,000)
Absorbed fixed production overhead 44,000
Over-recovery of overheads 4,000
(c) Profit for the Quarter (Absorption Costing)
(`) (`)
Sales revenue (160 units × ` 2,000): (A) 3,20,000
Less: Production costs:
- Variable cost (220 units × ` 800) 1,76,000
- Fixed overheads absorbed (220 units × ` 200) 44,000 2,20,000
Add: Opening stock --
 `2,20,000  (60,000)
Less: Closing Stock  ×60units 
 220units 
Cost of Goods sold 1,60,000
Less: Adjustment for over-absorption of fixed (4,000)
production overheads
Add: Selling & Distribution Overheads:
- Variable (160 units × `400) 64,000
- Fixed (1/4th of ` 2,40,000) 60,000 1,24,000
Cost of Sales (B) 2,80,000
Profit {(A) – (B)} 40,000

(d) Profit for the Quarter (Marginal Costing)
(`) (`)
Sales revenue (160 units × ` 2,000): (A) 3,20,000
Less: Production costs:
- Variable cost (220 units × ` 800) 1,76,000
Add: Opening stock --
 `1,76,000  (48,000)
Less: Closing Stock  ×60units 
 220units 
Variable cost of goods sold 1,28,000
Add: Selling & Distribution Overheads:
- Variable (160 units × `400) 64,000
Cost of Sales (B) 1,92,000
Contribution {(C) = (A) – (B)} 1,28,000
Less: Fixed Costs:
- Production cost (40,000)
- Selling & distribution cost (60,000) (1,00,000)
Profit 28,000
SUMMARY
♦ Marginal Cost: Marginal cost as understood in economics is the incremental
cost of production which arises due to one-unit increase in the production
quantity. Marginal cost is measured by the total variable cost attributable to
one unit.
♦ Marginal Costing: It is a costing system where products or services and
inventories are valued at variable costs only. It does not take consideration of
fixed costs.
♦ Absorption Costing: A method of costing by which all direct cost and
applicable overheads are charged to products or cost centers for finding out
the total cost of production. Absorbed cost includes production cost as well as
administrative and other cost.

♦ Contribution: Contribution or contribution margin is the difference between

sales revenue and total variable costs irrespective of manufacturing or non-
manufacturing.
♦ Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis: It is an analysis of reciprocal effect of
changes in cost, volume and profitability. Such an analysis explores the
relationship between costs, revenue, activity levels and the resulting profit. It
aims at measuring variations in cost and volume.
♦ Contribution to Sales Ratio (Profit Volume Ratio or P/V ratio): This ratio
shows the proportion of sales available to cover fixed costs and profit.
Contribution represent the sales revenue after deducting variable costs.
♦ Break-even Point (BEP): The level of sales where an entity neither earns profit
nor incurs loss. BEP is indicated in both quantity and monetary value terms.
♦ Margin of Safety (MOS): The margin between sales and the break-even sales
is known as margin of safety. It can either be indicated in quantitative or
monetary terms.
♦ Angle of Incidence: This angle is formed by the intersection of sales line and
total cost line at the break-even point. This angle shows the rate at which
profits is earned once the break-even point is reached.
♦ Limiting (Key) factor: Limiting factor is anything which limits the activity of
an entity. The factor is a key to determine the level of sale and production, thus
it is also known as Key factor.
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE

MCQs based Questions
1. Under marginal costing the cost of product includes:
(a) Prime costs only.
(b) Prime costs and variable overheads.
(c) Prime costs and fixed overheads.
(d) Prime costs and factory overheads.
2. Reporting under marginal costing is accomplished by:
(a) Treating all costs as period costs.
(b) Eliminating the work-in-progress inventory account.

(c) Matching variable costs against revenue and treating fixed costs as
period costs.
(d) Including only variable costs in income statement.
3. Period costs are:
(a) Variable costs.
(b) Fixed costs.
(c) Prime costs.
(d) Overheads costs.
4. When sales and production (in units) are same then profit under:
(a) Marginal costing is higher than that of absorption costing.
(b) Marginal costing is lower than that of absorption costing.
(c) Marginal costing is equal to that of absorption costing.
(d) None of the above.
5. When sales exceed production (in units) then profit under:
(a) Marginal costing is higher than that of absorption costing.
(b) Marginal costing is lower than that of absorption costing.
(c) Marginal costing is equal than that of absorption costing.
(d) None of above.
6. The main difference between marginal costing and absorption costing is
regarding the treatment of:
(a) Prime cost.
(b) Fixed overheads.
(c) Direct materials.
(d) Variable overheads.
7. Under profit volume ratio, the term profit:
(a) Means the sales proceeds in excess of total costs.
(b) Here mean the same thing as is generally understood.

(c) Is a misnomer, it in fact refers to contribution i.e. (sales revenue-variable

costs).
(d) None of the above.
8. Factors which can change the break-even point:
(a) Change in fixed costs.
(b) Change in variable costs.
(c) Change in the selling price.
(d) All of the above.
9. If P/V ratio is 40% of sales then what about the remaining 60% of sales:
(a) Profit.
(b) Fixed cost.
(c) Variable cost.
(d) Margin of safety.
10. The P/V ratio of a product is 0.6 and profit is ` 9,000. The margin of safety is:
(a) ` 5,400
(b) ` 15,000
(c) ` 22,500
(d) ` 3,600
Theoretical Questions
1. EXPLAIN and ILLUSTRATE break-even point with the help of break-even chart.
2. WRITE a short note on Angle of Incidence.
3. DISCUSS basic assumptions of Cost Volume Profit analysis.
4. DISCUSS the practical application of Marginal Costing.
5. DISCUSS the points of difference between absorption costing and marginal
costing
6. WRITE a short note on Margin of safety.

Practical Questions
1. If P/V ratio is 60% and the Marginal cost of the product is ` 20. CALCULATE
the selling price?
2. The ratio of variable cost to sales is 70%. The break-even point occurs at 60%
of the capacity sales. Find the capacity sales when fixed costs are ` 90,000.
Also COMPUTE profit at 75% of the capacity sales.
3. You are required to-
(`)
(i) DETERMINE profit, when sales = 2,00,000
Fixed Cost = 40,000
BEP = 1,60,000
(ii) DETERMINE sales, when fixed cost = 20,000
Profit = 10,000
BEP = 40,000
4. A company has made a profit of ` 50,000 during the year 2019-20. If the
selling price and marginal cost of the product are ` 15 and ` 12 per unit
respectively, FIND OUT the amount of margin of safety.
5. (a) If margin of safety is ` 2,40,000 (40% of sales) and P/V ratio is 30% of
AB Ltd, CALCULATE its (1) Break even sales, and (2) Amount of profit on
sales of `9,00,000.
(b) X Ltd. has earned a contribution of `2,00,000 and net profit of `1,50,000
of sales of ` 8,00,000. What is its margin of safety?
6. A company sells its product at ` 15 per unit. In a period, if it produces and
sells 8,000 units, it incurs a loss of ` 5 per unit. If the volume is raised to
20,000 units, it earns a profit of ` 4 per unit. CALCULATE break-even point
both in terms of Value as well as in units.
7. You are given the following data:
Sales Profit
Year 2019 ` 1,20,000 8,000
Year 2020 ` 1,40,000 13,000

FIND OUT –
(i) P/V ratio,
(ii) B.E. Point,
(iii) Profit when sales are ` 1,80,000,
(iv) Sales required earn a profit of ` 12,000,
(v) Margin of safety in year 2020.
8. The product mix of a Gama Ltd. is as under:
Products
M N
Units 54,000 18,000
Selling price ` 7.50 ` 15.00
Variable cost ` 6.00 ` 4.50
FIND the break-even points in units, if the company discontinues product ‘M’
and replace with product ‘O’. The quantity of product ‘O’ is 9,000 units and
its selling price and variable costs respectively are ` 18 and ` 9. Fixed Cost is
` 15,000.
9. Mr. X has ` 2,00,000 investments in his business firm. He wants a 15 per cent
return on his money. From an analysis of recent cost figures, he finds that his
variable cost of operating is 60 per cent of sales, his fixed costs are ` 80,000
per year. Show COMPUTATIONS to answer the following questions:
(i) What sales volume must be obtained to break even?
(ii) What sales volume must be obtained to get 15 per cent return on
investment?
(iii) Mr. X estimates that even if he closed the doors of his business, he
would incur ` 25,000 as expenses per year. At what sales would he be
better off by locking his business up?
10. A company had incurred fixed expenses of ` 4,50,000, with sales of
` 15,00,000 and earned a profit of ` 3,00,000 during the first half year. In the
second half, it suffered a loss of ` 1,50,000.

CALCULATE:
(i) The profit-volume ratio, break-even point and margin of safety for the
first half year.
(ii) Expected sales volume for the second half year assuming that selling
price and fixed expenses remained unchanged during the second half
year.
(iii) The break-even point and margin of safety for the whole year.
11. The following information is given by Star Ltd.:
Margin of Safety ` 1,87,500
Total Cost ` 1,93,750
Margin of Safety 3,750 units
Break-even Sales 1,250 units
Required:
CALCULATE Profit, P/V Ratio, BEP Sales (in `) and Fixed Cost.
12. A single product company sells its product at ` 60 per unit. In 2019, the
company operated at a margin of safety of 40%. The fixed costs amounted
to ` 3,60,000 and the variable cost ratio to sales was 80%.
In 2020, it is estimated that the variable cost will go up by 10% and the fixed
cost will increase by 5%.
(i) FIND the selling price required to be fixed in 2020 to earn the same P/V
ratio as in 2019.
(ii) Assuming the same selling price of ` 60 per unit in 2020, FIND the
number of units required to be produced and sold to earn the same
profit as in 2019.
13. (a) You are given the following data for the coming year for a factory.
Budgeted output 8,00,000 units

Fixed expenses ` 40,00,000
Variable expenses per unit ` 100
Selling price per unit ` 200

DRAW a break-even chart showing the break-even point.

(b) If price is reduced to ` 180, what will be the new break-even point?
14. A company has three factories situated in north, east and south with its Head
Office in Mumbai. The management has received the following summary
report on the operations of each factory for a period:
(` in ‘000)
Sales Profit
Actual Over/(Under) Actual Over/(Under)
Budget Budget
North 1,100 (400) 135 (180)
East 1,450 150 210 90
South 1,200 (200) 330 (110)
CALCULATE for each factory and for the company as a whole for the period:
(i) the fixed costs. (ii) break-even sales.
15. An automobile manufacturing company produces different models of Cars.
The budget in respect of model 007 for the month of March, 2020 is as under:
Budgeted Output 40,000 Units

` In lakhs ` In lakhs
Net Realisation 2,10,000
Variable Costs:
Materials 79,200
Labour 15,600
Direct expenses 37,200 1,32,000
Specific Fixed Costs 27,000
Allocated Fixed Costs 33,750 60,750
Total Costs 1,92,750
Profit 17,250
Sales 2,10,000

CALCULATE:
(i) Profit with 10 percent increase in selling price with a 10 percent
reduction in sales volume.
(ii) Volume to be achieved to maintain the original profit after a 10 percent
rise in material costs, at the originally budgeted selling price per unit.
16. An Indian soft drink company is planning to establish a subsidiary company
in Bhutan to produce mineral water. Based on the estimated annual sales of
40,000 bottles of the mineral water, cost studies produced the following
estimates for the Bhutanese subsidiary:
Total annual costs Percent of Total Annual
Cost which is variable
Material 2,10,000 100%
Labour 1,50,000 80%
Factory Overheads 92,000 60%
Administration Expenses 40,000 35%
The Bhutanese production will be sold by manufacturer’s representatives who

will receive a commission of 8% of the sale price. No portion of the Indian
office expenses is to be allocated to the Bhutanese subsidiary. You are
required to
(i) COMPUTE the sale price per bottle to enable the management to realize
an estimated 10% profit on sale proceeds in Bhutan.
(ii) CALCULATE the break-even point in rupees sales as also in number of
bottles for the Bhutanese subsidiary on the assumption that the sale
price is ` 14 per bottle.
17. XYZ Ltd. has a production capacity of 2,00,000 units per year. Normal capacity
utilisation is reckoned as 90%. Standard variable production costs are ` 11
per unit. The fixed costs are `3,60,000 per year. Variable selling costs are ` 3
per unit and fixed selling costs are `2,70,000 per year. The unit selling price
is ` 20.
In the year just ended on 30th June, 2020, the production was 1,60,000 units
and sales were 1,50,000 units. The closing inventory on 30th June was 20,000
units. The actual variable production costs for the year were ` 35,000 higher
than the standard.

(i) CALCULATE the profit for the year

(a) by absorption costing method and
(b) by marginal costing method.
(ii) EXPLAIN the difference in the profits.
18. The following are cost data for three alternative ways of processing the
clerical work for cases brought before the LC Court System:
A B C
Manual (`) Semi-Automatic (`) Fully-Automatic (`)
Monthly fixed costs:
Occupancy 15,000 15,000 15,000
Maintenance --- 5,000 10,000
contract
Equipment lease --- 25,000 1,00,000
Unit variable costs
(per report):
Supplies 40 80 20
Labour `200 `60 `20
(5 hrs × `40) (1 hr × `60) (0.25 hr × `80)
Required:
(i) CALCULATE cost indifference points. Interpret your results.
(ii) If the present case load is 600 cases and it is expected to go up to 850
cases in near future, SELECT most appropriate on cost considerations?
19. XY Ltd. makes two products X and Y, whose respective fixed costs are F1 and
F2. You are given that the unit contribution of Y is one fifth less than the unit
contribution of X, that the total of F 1 and F2 is `1,50,000, that the BEP of X
is 1,800 units (for BEP of X, F2 is not considered) and that 3,000 units is
the indifference point between X and Y.(i.e. X and Y make equal profits at
3,000 unit volume, considering their respective fixed costs). There is no
inventory buildup as whatever is produced is sold.
Required
FIND OUT the values F1 and F2 and units contributions of X and Y.

20. Prisha Limited manufactures three different products and the following
information has been collected from the books of accounts:
Products
A B C
Sales Mix 40% 35% 25%
Selling Price ` 300 ` 400 ` 200
Variable Cost ` 150 ` 200 ` 120
Total Fixed Costs ` 18,00,000
Total Sales ` 60,00,000
The company has currently under discussion, a proposal to discontinue the

manufacture of Product C and replace it with Product E, when the following
results are anticipated:
Products
A B E
Sales Mix 45% 30% 25%
Selling Price ` 300 `400 ` 300
Variable Cost ` 150 `200 ` 150
Total Fixed Costs ` 18,00,000
Total Sales ` 64,00,000
Required:
(i) CALCULATE the total contribution to sales ratio and present break-even
sales at existing sales mix.
(ii) CALCULATE the total contribution to sales ratio and present break-even
sales at proposed sales mix.
(iii) STATE whether the proposed sales mix is accepted or not?
ANSWERS/ SOLUTIONS
Answers to the MCQs based Questions
1. (b) 2. (c) 3. (b) 4. (c) 5. (a) 6. (b)

7. (c) 8. (d) 9. (c) 10. (b)

Answers to the Theoretical Questions
1. Please refer paragraph 14.8
Answers to the Practical Questions
1. Variable Cost = 100 – P/V Ratio
= 100 – 60 = 40
If Variable cost is 40, then selling price = 100
If Variable cost is 20, then selling price = (100/40) × 20 = ` 50
2. Variable cost to sales = 70%, Contribution to sales = 30%,
Or P/V Ratio 30%
We know that: BES × P/V Ratio = Fixed Cost
BES × 0.30 = ` 90,000
Or BES = ` 3,00,000
It is given that break-even occurs at 60% capacity.
Capacity sales = ` 3,00,000 ÷ 0.60 = ` 5,00,000
Computation of profit of 75% Capacity
75% of capacity sales (i.e. ` 5,00,000 × 0.75) = ` 3,75,000
Less: Variable cost (i.e. ` 3,75,000 × 0.70) = ` 2,62,500
= ` 1,12,500
Less: Fixed Cost =` 90,000
Profit =` 22,500
3. (i) We know that: B.E. Sales × P/V Ratio = Fixed Cost

or ` 1,60,000 × P/V ratio = ` 40,000

P/V ratio = 25%
We also know that Sales × P/V Ratio = Fixed Cost + Profit
or ` 2,00,000 × 0.25 = ` 40,000 + Profit
or Profit = ` 10,000
(ii) Again B.E. Sales × P/V ratio = Fixed Cost
or ` 40,000 × P/V Ratio = ` 20,000
or P/V ratio = 50%
We also know that: Sales × P/V ratio = Fixed Cost + Profit
or Sales × 0.50 = ` 20,000 + ` 10,000
or Sales = ` 60,000.
Contribution
4. P/V Ratio = × 100
Sales
= [(15 – 12)/15] × 100
= (3/15) x 100 = 20%
Marginal of Safety = Profit ÷ P/V Ratio
= 50,000 ÷ 20% = ` 2,50,000
100
5. (a) Total Sales = 2,40,000 × = ` 6,00,000
40
Contribution = 6,00,000 × 30% = ` 1,80,000
Profit = M/S × P/V ratio = 2,40,000 × 30% = ` 72,000
Fixed cost = Contribution – Profit
= 1,80,000 – 72,000 = ` 1,08,000
Fixed Cost 1,08,000
(1) Break-even Sales = = = ` 3,60,000
P / V ratio 30%
(2) Profit = (Sales × P/V ratio) – Fixed cost

= (9,00,000 × 30%) – 1,08,000 = ` 1,62,000

(b) P/V ratio = = = 25%
Sales 8,00,000
Profit 1,50,000
Margin of safety = = = ` 6,00,000
P/V ratio 25%
Alternatively:
Fixed cost = Contribution – Profit
= ` 2,00,000 – `1,50,000 = ` 50,000
B.E. Point = ` 50,000 ÷ 25% = ` 2,00,000

Margin of Safety = Actual sales – B.E. sales
= 8,00,000 – 2,00,000 = 6,00,000
6. We know that S – V =F+P
∴ Suppose variable cost = x, Fixed Cost = y
In first situation:
15 × 8,000 - 8,000 x = y – 40,000 (1)
In second situation:
15 × 20,000 - 20,000 x = y + 80,000 (2)
or, 1,20,000 – 8,000 x = y – 40,000 (3)
3,00,000 – 20,000 x = y + 80,000 (4)
From (3) & (4) we get x = ` 5, Variable cost per unit = ` 5
Putting this value in 3rd equation:
1,20,000 – (8,000 × 5) = y – 40,000
or, y = ` 1,20,000
Fixed Cost = ` 1,20,000
S − V 15 − 5 200 2
P/V ratio = = × 100 = = 66 %.
S 15 3 3
Suppose break-even sales = x
15x – 5x = 1,20,000 (at BEP, contribution will be equal to fixed cost)
x = 12,000 units.

or, Break-even sales in units = 12,000, Break-even sales in Value

= 12,000 × 15 = `1,80,000.
7.
Sales Profit
Year 2019 ` 1,20,000 8,000
Year 2020 ` 1,40,000 13,000
Difference ` 20,000 5,000
Difference in profit
(i) P/V Ratio = × 100 = 5,000 × 100 = 25%
Difference in Sales 20,000
(`)
Contribution in 2019 (1,20,000 × 25%) 30,000
Less: Profit 8,000
Fixed Cost* 22,000
*Contribution = Fixed cost + Profit
∴ Fixed cost = Contribution - Profit
Fixed cost 22,000
(ii) Break-even point = = = ` 88,000
P/V ratio 25%
(iii) Profit when sales are `1,80,000 (`)

Contribution (`1,80,000 × 25%) 45,000
Less: Fixed cost 22,000
Profit 23,000
(iv) Sales to earn a profit of `12,000

Fixed cost + Desired profit 22,000 + 12,000
= = `1,36,000
P/V ratio 25%
(v) Margin of safety in 2020 –

Margin of safety = Actual sales – Break-even sales
= 1,40,000 – 88,000 = ` 52,000.

8. N = 18,000 units
O = 9,000 units
Ratio (N : O) = 2:1
Let
t = No. of units of ‘O’ for BEP
2t = No. of units of ‘N’ for BEP
Contribution of ‘N’ = ` 10.5 per unit
Contribution of ‘O’ = ` 9 per unit
At Break Even Point:
10.5 x (2t) + 9 x t -15,000 = 0
30t = 15,000
t = 500 units
BEP of ‘N’ = 2t
= 1,000 units
BEP of ‘O’ = t= 500 units
9.
Particulars (`)
Suppose sales 100
Variable cost 60
Contribution 40
P/V ratio 40%
Fixed cost = ` 80,000
(i) Break-even point = Fixed Cost ÷ P/V ratio =80,000 ÷ 40% or ` 2,00,000
(ii) 15% return on ` 2,00,000 30,000
Fixed Cost 80,000
Contribution required 1,10,000
Sales volume required = ` 1,10,000 ÷ 40% or ` 2,75,000
(iii) Avoidable fixed cost if business is locked up = ` 80,000 - ` 25,000
= ` 55,000

Minimum sales required to meet this cost: ` 55,000 ÷ 40%

or ` 1,37,500
Mr. X will be better off by locking his business up, if the sale is less than
` 1,37,500
10. (i) In the First half year:
Contribution = Fixed cost + Profit
= 4,50,000 + 3,00,000 = ` 7,50,000

P/V ratio = ×100 = × 100 = 50%
Sales 15,00,000
Fixed cost 4,50,000
Break-even point = = × 100 = ` 9,00,000
P/V ratio 50%
Margin of safety = Actual sales – Break-even point
= 15,00,000 – 9,00,000 = ` 6,00,000

(ii) In the second half year:
Contribution = Fixed cost – Loss
= 4,50,000 – 1,50,000 = ` 3,00,000

Fixed cost - Loss 3,00,000
Expected sales volume = = = ` 6,00,000
P / V ratio 50%
(iii) For the whole year:

Fixed cost 4,50,000 × 2
B.E. point = = = `18,00,000
P/V ratio 50%
Profit 3,00,000 − 1,50,000

Margin of safety = = = ` 3,00,000.
P/V ratio 50%
3,750units
11. Margin of Safety (%) =
3,750units+1,250units
= 75%
`1,87,500
Total Sales = = ` 2,50,000
0.75

Profit = Total Sales – Total Cost

= ` 2,50,000 – ` 1,93,750
= ` 56,250
Profit
P/V Ratio = ×100
Marginof Safety (` )
`56,250
= ×100
`1,87,500
= 30%
Break-even Sales = Total Sales × [100 – Margin of Safety %]
= ` 2,50,000 × 0.25
= ` 62,500
Fixed Cost = Sales × P/V Ratio – Profit
= ` 2,50,000 × 0.30 – ` 56,250
= ` 18,750
12. (i) Profit earned in 2019:
Particulars (`)
Total contribution (50,000 × ` 12) 6,00,000
Less: Fixed cost 3,60,000
Profit 2,40,000
Selling price to be fixed in 2020:
Revised variable cost (` 48 × 1.10) 52.80
Revised fixed cost (3,60,000 × 1.05) 3,78,000
P/V Ratio (Same as of 2019) 20%
Variable cost ratio to selling price 80%
Therefore, revised selling price per unit = ` 52.80 ÷ 80% = ` 66

(ii) No. of units to be produced and sold in 2020 to earn the same
profit:
We know that Fixed Cost plus profit = Contribution
(`)
Profit in 2019 2,40,000
Fixed cost in 2020 3,78,000
Desired contribution in 2020 6,18,000
Contribution per unit = Selling price per unit – Variable cost per unit.
= ` 60 – ` 52.80 = ` 7.20.
No. of units to be produced in 2020 = ` 6,18,000 ÷ ` 7.20 = 85,834 units.
Workings:
1. PV Ratio in 2019
(`)
Selling price per unit 60
Variable cost (80% of Selling Price) 48
Contribution 12
P/V Ratio 20%
2. No. of units sold in 2019

Break-even point = Fixed cost ÷ Contribution per unit
= ` 3,60,000 ÷ ` 12 = 30,000 units.
Margin of safety is 40%. Therefore, break-even sales will be 60%
of units sold.
No. of units sold = Break-even point in units ÷ 60%
= 30,000 ÷ 60% = 50,000 units.
13. (a) Contribution = S – V = ` 200 – ` 100 = ` 100 per unit.
Fixed cost 40,00,000
B.E. Point = = = 40,000 units
Contribution per unit `100
(b) When selling price is reduced

New selling price = ` 180

New Contribution = ` 180 – ` 100 = ` 80 per unit.

` 40,00,000
New B.E. Point = = 50,000 units.
` 80
The break-even chart is shown below:
200
(Rs.'00000)
'00000)
ine
esl e
l lin
Sa le s
160 sa
Revenue (`
e w
N
andRevenue
line
l c ost
a
120 Tot
Costand
B.E.P.
Cost
80 New break-even point
Fixed cost line

40
0
20 40 50 60 80 100
Output ('000 units)
14. Calculation of P/V Ratio (`‘ 000)
Sales Profit
North : Actual 1,100 135
Add : Under budgeted 400 180
Budgeted 1,500 315
Diferenece in Profit 315 − 135 180
P/V ratio = = = × 100 = × 100 = 45%
Difference in Sales 1,500 − 1,100 400

(` ‘000)
Sales Profit
East : Actual 1,450 210
Less : Over budgeted (150) (90)
Budgeted 1,300 120
90
P/V ratio = × 100 = 60%
150
(`’ 000)
Sales Profit
South : Actual 1,200 330
Add: Under budgeted 200 110
Budgeted 1,400 440
110
P/V ratio = × 100 = 55%
200
(i) Calculation of fixed cost
Fixed Cost = (Actual sales × P/V ratio) – Profit
North = (1,100 × 45%) – 135 = 360
East = (1,450 × 60%) – 210 = 660
South = (1,200 × 55%) – 330 = 330
Total Fixed Cost 1,350
(ii) Calculation of break-even sales (in `’ 000)
Fixed Cost
B.E. Sales =
P/V ratio
360
North = = 800
45%
660
East = = 1,100
60%
330
South = = 600
55%
Total 2,500

15. (i) Budgeted selling price = 2,10,000 lakhs/ 40,000 units = `5,25,000 per unit.
Budgeted variable cost = 1,32,000 lakhs/ 40,000 units = ` 3,30,000 per unit.
Increased selling price = `5,25,000 + 10% = ` 5,77,500 per unit
New volume 40,000 – 10% = 36,000 units
Statement of Calculation of Profit:
(` In lakhs)
Sales 36,000 units at ` 5,77,500 = 2,07,900
Less: Variable cost: 36,000 × `3,30,000 = 1,18,800
Contribution 89,100
Less: fixed costs 60,750
Profit 28,350
(ii) Budgeted Material Cost = 79,200 Lakhs/ 40,000 Units = `1,98,000 per Unit
Increased material cost = `1,98,000×110% = 2,17,800

Labour cost 15,600 lakhs/ 40,000 units = 39,000
Direct expenses, 37,200 lakhs/ 40,000 units = 93,000
Variable cost per unit 3,49,800
Budgeted selling price per unit 5,25,000
Contribution per unit (5,25,000 – 3,49,800) 1,75,200
Fixed costs+Profit 60,750 lakhs + 17,250 lakhs

Sales volume = =
Contribution Per Unit `1.752 lakhs
= 44,521 units are to be sold to maintain the original profit

of ` 17,250 lakhs.
16. (i) Computation of Sale Price Per Bottle

Output: 40,000 Bottles
Particulars (`)
Variable Cost:
Material 2,10,000
Labour (`1,50,000 × 80%) 1,20,000
Factory Overheads (`92,000 × 60%) 55,200

Administrative Overheads (`40,000 × 35%) 14,000

Commission (8% on `6,00,000) (W.N.-1) 48,000
Fixed Cost:
Labour (`1,50,000 × 20%) 30,000
Factory Overheads (`92,000 × 40%) 36,800
Administrative Overheads (`40,000 × 65%) 26,000
Total Cost 5,40,000
Profit (W.N.-1) 60,000
Sales Proceeds (W.N.-1) 6,00,000
 ` 6,00,000  15
Sales Price per bottle  
 40,000 Bottles 
(ii) Calculation of Break-even Point
Sales Price per Bottle = `14
` 4,44,000 (W.N.- 2)
Variable Cost per Bottle = = `11.10
40,000 Bottles
Contribution per Bottle = `14 − `11.10 = `2.90

Break -even Point:
Fixed Costs
(in number of Bottles) =
Contribution per Bottle
`92,800
= = 32,000Bottles
`2.90
(in Sales Value) = 32,000 Bottles × `14
= `4,48,000
Working Note
W.N.-1
Let the Sales Price be ‘x’
8x
Commission =
100
10x
Profit =
100

8x 10x
x = 4,92,000 + +
100 100
100x - 8x - 10x = 4,92,00,000
82x = 4,92,00,000
x = 4,92,00,000 / 82 = `6,00,000
W.N.-2
Total Variable Cost (`)
Material 2,10,000
Labour 1,20,000
Factory Overheads 55,200
Administrative Overheads 14,000
Commission [(40,000 Bottles × `14) × 8%] 44,800
4,44,000
17. Income Statement (Absorption Costing) for the year ending
30th June 2020
(`) (`)
Sales (1,50,000 units @ `20) 30,00,000
Production Costs:
Variable (1,60,000 units @ `11) 17,60,000
Add: Increase 35,000 17,95,000
Fixed (1,60,000 units @ `2*) 3,20,000
Cost of Goods Produced 21,15,000
Add: Opening stock (10,000 units @ `13) * 1,30,000
22,45,000
 ` 21,15,000  2,64,375
Less: Closing stock  ×20,000 units 
 1,60,000 units 
Cost of Goods Sold 19,80,625
Add: Under absorbed fixed production overhead 40,000
(3,60,000 – 3,20,000)
20,20,625

Add: Non-production costs:

Variable selling costs (1,50,000 units @ `3) 4,50,000
Fixed selling costs 2,70,000
Total cost 27,40,625
Profit (Sales – Total Cost) 2,59,375
* Working Notes:
1. Fixed production overhead is absorbed at a pre-determined rate based
on normal capacity, i.e. `3,60,000 ÷ 1,80,000 units = ` 2.
2. Opening stock is 10,000 units, i.e., 1,50,000 units + 20,000 units –
1,60,000 units. It is valued at `13 per unit, i.e., `11 + `2 (Variable +
fixed).
Income Statement (Marginal Costing) for the year ended
30th June, 2020
(`) (`)
Sales (1,50,000 units @ `20) 30,00,000
Variable production cost (1,60,000 units @ 17,95,000
`11 + `35,000)
Variable selling cost (1,50,000 units @ `3) 4,50,000
22,45,000
Add: Opening Stock (10,000 units @ `11) 1,10,000
23,55,000
Less: Closing stock
 `17,95,000  2,24,375
 ×20,000 units 
 1,60,000 units 
Variable cost of goods sold 21,30,625
Contribution (Sales – Variable cost of 8,69,375
goods sold)
Less: Fixed cost – Production 3,60,000
– Selling 2,70,000 6,30,000
Profit 2,39,375

Reasons for Difference in Profit: (`)

Profit as per absorption costing 2,59,375
Add: Op. stock under –valued in marginal costing 20,000
(`1,30,000 – 1,10,000)
2,79,375
Less: Cl. Stock under –valued in marginal closing 40,000
(`2,64,375 – 2,24,375)
Profit as per marginal costing 2,39,375
18. (i) Cost Indifference Point
A and B A and C B and C

(`) (`) (`)
Differential Fixed Cost (I) `30,000 `1,10,000 `80,000
(`45,000 – (`1,25,000 – (`1,25,000 –
`15,000) `15,000) `45,000)
Differential Variable Costs (II) `100 `200 `100
(`240 –`140) (`240 – `40) (`140 – `40)
Cost Indifference Point (I/II) 300 550 800
(Differential Fixed Cost / Cases Cases Cases
Differential Variable Costs per
case)
Interpretation of Results
At activity level below the indifference points, the alternative with lower
fixed costs and higher variable costs should be used. At activity level
above the indifference point alternative with higher fixed costs and
lower variable costs should be used.
No. of Cases Alternative to be Chosen

Cases ≤ 300 Alternative ‘A’
300 ≥ Cases ≤ 800 Alternative ‘B’
Cases ≥ 800 Alternative ‘C’
(ii) Present case load is 600. Therefore, alternative B is suitable. As the

number of cases is expected to go upto 850 cases, alternative C is most
appropriate.

19. Let Cx be the Contribution per unit of Product X.

Therefore, Contribution per unit of Product Y =Cy=4/5Cx = 0.8Cx
Given F1 + F2 = 1,50,000,
F1 = 1,800Cx (Break even Volume × Contribution per unit)
Therefore, F2 = 1,50,000 – 1,800Cx.
3,000Cx –F1 =3,000 × 0.8Cx – F2 or 3,000Cx – F1 =2,400 Cx-F2 (Indifference Point)
i.e., 3,000Cx – 1,800Cx = 2,400Cx – 1,50,000 + 1,800Cx
i.e., 3,000Cx = 1,50,000, Therefore, Cx = ` 50/- (1,50,000 / 3,000)
Therefore, Contribution per unit of X = ` 50
Fixed Cost of X = F1 = ` 90,000 (1,800 × 50)
Therefore, Contribution per unit of Y is ` 50 × 0.8 = ` 40 and
Fixed Cost of Y = F2 = ` 60,000 (1,50,000 – 90,000)
The Value of F1 = ` 90,000, F2 = ` 60,000 and X = ` 50 and Y = ` 40
20. (i) Calculation of Contribution to sales ratio at existing sales mix:
Products
Total
A B C
Selling Price (`) 300 400 200
Less: Variable Cost (`) 150 200 120
Contribution per unit (`) 150 200 80
P/V Ratio 50% 50% 40%
Sales Mix 40% 35% 25%
Contribution per rupee of sales (P/V
20% 17.5% 10% 47.5%
Ratio × Sales Mix)
Present Total Contribution (` 60,00,000
` 28,50,000
× 47.5%)
Less: Fixed Costs ` 18,00,000
Present Profit ` 10,50,000
Present Break-Even Sales
` 37,89,473.68
(` 18,00,000/0.475)

(ii) Calculation of Contribution to sales ratio at proposed sales mix:
Products
A B E Total
Selling Price (`) 300 400 300
Less: Variable Cost (`) 150 200 150
Contribution per unit (`) 150 200 150
P/V Ratio 50% 50% 50%
Sales Mix 45% 30% 25%
Contribution per rupee of sales
22.5% 15% 12.5% 50%
(P/V Ratio x Sales Mix)
Proposed Total Contribution ` 32,00,000
(` 64,00,000 × 50%)
Less: Fixed Costs ` 18,00,000
Proposed Profit ` 14,00,000
Proposed Break-Even Sales ` 36,00,000
(` 18,00,000/0.50)
(iii) The proposed sales mix increases the total contribution to sales ratio
from 47.5% to 50% and the total profit from ` 10,50,000 to ` 14,00,000.
Thus, the proposed sales mix should be accepted.

Marginal Costing Icai Material

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Marginal Costing Icai Material

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Marginal Costing Icai Material

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER 14

 Explain the meaning and characteristics of Marginal Costing.

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Meaning of Marginal Cost

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

(i) Direct Material @ `10 per unit 1,00,000 1,00,010 10

2. Marginal Costing: It is a costing system where products or services and

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

14.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF MARGINAL COSTING

14.3 FACTS ABOUT MARGINAL COSTING

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

interpretation of cost data to measure the profitability of different products,

14.4 DETERMINATION OF COST AND PROFIT

Amount Amount (`)

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

(i) Product (Inventoriable) Costs: In the case of merchandise inventory, these

Contribution (C) = Sales Revenue (S) – Total Variable Cost (V)

It is obtained by subtracting variable costs from sales revenue. It can also be

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

14.5 ABSORPTION COSTING

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

(For understanding the difference between marginal and absorption costing

14.6 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

14.7 COST-VOLUME-PROFIT (CVP) ANALYSIS

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

3. Sensitivity of profits due to variation in output.

Marginal Cost Equation = S -V = C = F ± P

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

14.7.2 Contribution to Sales Ratio (Profit Volume Ratio or P/V ratio)

Contribution Change in contribution / Profit

14.7.3 Break-Even Analysis

14.8 METHODS OF BREAK -EVEN ANALYSIS

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Example 3: ABC Ltd. manufacturing a single product, incurring variable costs of `

Total fixed cost

Cash fixed costs

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Sales mix (in quantity) is 4 units of Product- J and 3 units of Product- K

i.e. Sales ratio is 4 : 3

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

You are given the following particulars CALCULATE:

(b) Sales to earn a Profit of ` 20,000:

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

This means sales value to be increased by 60% of the existing sales.

Desired Contribution 0.40

Therefore, Sales value to be increased by 60% and sales quantity to be doubled to

Data after the change in selling price:

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

(B) GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF BREAK EVEN CHART

14.8.5 Contribution Breakeven chart

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Working notes (i)