NETTUR TECHNICAL TRAINING FOUNDATION

CP15 – DIPLOMA IN MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING AND SMART FACTORY

FOUNDATION CLASS
FEEDBACK FORM
Please rate the foundation level session on the scale indicated. Your comments are most valued.
Please enter your feedback in the word format with font Calibri, size 11, and color black. Enter the value for the parameter columns
Subject: ELECTRONICS - II
Master Trainer Name: Mrs.Lakshmipriya P
Local Subject In-charge Name: Methila.M
Centre: KTC

Unacceptable

Outstanding
Needs work

Very good

Excellent
Good
Fair
SL NO. PARAMETERS

RATINGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 The Topic
a. Have the topic started with a general introduction to understand the concepts. 6
b. How relevant was the general concepts with the technical topic. 5
2 The Presenter
a. Time Management. 5
b. Enthusiasm. 6
c. Interaction with the audience. 5
3 The Presentation
a. Information was presented in an organized manner. 5
b. Used case-based methods; related information to practical problems. 4
c. Quality of audiovisual aids. 5
4 The Content
a. Volume and complexity of the information was appropriate. 5
b. Related content to current evidence in the works. 5
5 The Outcome
a. How much can you relate the topic with your practical. 6
b. How much have you understood the topic related to the real time world. 5
6 What were the two best things about the session & Master trainer?
1 Classes are covered with related information to practical problems.
2 Interaction with the audience.
7 What two things about the session would you like to see improved?
1 Quality of audiovisual aids & Simulation on related topics .
Other comments:
 NETTUR TECHNICAL TRAINING FOUNDATION
CP15 – DIPLOMA IN MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING AND SMART FACTORY
FOUNDATION CLASS
FEEDBACK FORM
Please rate the foundation level session on the scale indicated. Your comments are most valued.
Please enter your feedback in the word format with font Calibri, size 11, and color black. Enter the value for the parameter columns
Subject: Pneumatics & Hydraulics
Master Trainer Name: Mr.Battula Rajesh Kumar
Local Subject In-charge Name: Methila.M
Centre: KTC

Unacceptable

Outstanding
Needs work

Very good

Excellent
Good
Fair
SL NO. PARAMETERS

RATINGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 The Topic
a. Have the topic started with a general introduction to understand the concepts. 5
b. How relevant was the general concepts with the technical topic. 6
2 The Presenter
a. Time Management. 5
b. Enthusiasm. 6
c. Interaction with the audience. 5
3 The Presentation
a. Information was presented in an organized manner. 5
b. Used case-based methods; related information to practical problems. 4
c. Quality of audiovisual aids. 5
4 The Content
a. Volume and complexity of the information was appropriate. 5
b. Related content to current evidence in the works. 5
5 The Outcome
a. How much can you relate the topic with your practical. 5
b. How much have you understood the topic related to the real time world. 5
6 What were the two best things about the session & Master trainer?
1 Explaining the concepts clearly multiple times.
2 Clearing the doubts without hesitation
7 What two things about the session would you like to see improved?
1 Quality of audiovisual aids.
2
Other comments: