STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND

DESIGN REPORT
FOR
Residential Building
of

NIR KUMARI RAI

PREPARED BY: Enginagar Construction Pvt. Ltd.

July 14, 2017

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3

1.1 ABOUT THIS REPORT ........................................................................................................................ 3

1.2 ABOUT THE STRUCTURE
...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 ANALYSIS
PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................................ 3

2. DETAILED PARAMETERS OF THE BUILDING ......................................................................................

4

2.1 GENERAL PARAMETERS ...................................................................................................................... 4

2.2 STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS
.................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 SOIL
PARAMETERS ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.4
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
....................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 DESIGN BASIS
................................................................................................................................... 5

3. LOADING ........................................................................................................................................ 6

3.1 DEAD LOADS

(DL) ............................................................................................................................. 6
3.2 LIVE LOADS (LL)
............................................................................................................................... 6 3.3
EARTHQUAKE LOADS (EL)
................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 LOAD
COMBINATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 7
4. DESIGN CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................
8

4.1 LIMIT STATE METHOD ........................................................................................................................ 8

5. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE .....................................................................................................

9

5.1 GRIDS AND NODE NUMBERS ............................................................................................................. 10

5.2 COLUMNS AND BEAMS SECTIONS
....................................................................................................... 11 5.3 LOADING ON THE STRUCTURE
............................................................................................................. 12
6. ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE .....................................................................................................
....14

6.1 SUPPORT REACTIONS

..........................................................................................................................14 6.2 BENDING
MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAMS ................................................................................. 15 6.3
 MODEL TIME PERIODS AND AUTO SEISMIC LOADS TO HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS ............................................ 19

7. DESIGN OF THE
STRUCTURE ....................................................................................................... ....20

7.1 DESIGN OF COLUMNS AND BEAMS .......................................................................................................20

8. DESIGN SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 38

8.1 BEAM DESIGN ................................................................................................................................. 38

8.2 COLUMN DESIGN

................................................................................................................................ 38 8.3
SLAB DESIGN
.................................................................................................................................... 39

8.4 STAIRCASE DESIGN ............................................................................................................................ 40 8.5

FOOTING DESIGN .............................................................................................................................. 43
9. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................
52

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 About this REPORT

This report deals with methodology of the structural analysis and design of a residential building
and its results. This report includes different parameters for the analysis and design of the
structure. The design results are shown in a very convenient tabular format.

The principal aim of the structural design is to prepare necessary construction detail of structural
system so as to possess adequate strength, stiffness and stability during the action of all possible
loads in its life span. Accordingly, the structural design data are presented in the report.

1.2 About the Structure

The structure which is analysed and design is a three storied residential building. It is going to be
constructed it Gokarneswor. It is a RCC‐Framed structure.

1.3 Analysis procedure

The structure has been modelled, analysed and designed in a computer software “SAP2000”.
The software has very good analysis and design capability which are verified in the verification
problems included in the package. It is a Finite Element Method (FEM) based software and
requires modelling of the structure by finite‐elements. Beams and columns are modelled with
line (or frame) elements, while the slabs and roofs are modelled with area‐elements.
 Page 3 of 46

2. DETAILED PARAMETERS OF
THE BUILDING
Different parameters are listed below. Building Height

Fundamental Time period

2.1 General
Parameters : Residential Building

Building Type : Gokarnashwor Ward No: 01

Location :Mrs. Nir Kumari Rai

Owner : 457, 460

Plot no : 3080.81 sq. ft (As per Lal Purja)

Site plan area : 932.08 square feet

Plinth Area : 2.5

No of Storey : 2.86 m (centre‐to‐centre)

Floor Height : 230mm for outer Walls, 115mm for partition

Wall thickness :1m

Parapet Height : 8.58 m

Total Ht

2.2 Structural : Isolated Footing System : Rectangular:

Parameters :(12”x12” )
Foundation Type
: 9”x14”
Columns
: Two‐way, 5” (127mm)
Beams
: 127 mm slab
Slabs
: Brick wall non‐load bearing
Staircase
: RCC Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
Walls
: 8.58 m
Structural System
: 0.37sec

Page 4 of 46
2.3 Soil Parameters
Soil Type : Medium soil (Type II)

Bearing Capacity : 150 KN/m2 at foundation level

2.4 Material Properties

Cement : Ordinary Portland cement (OPC)

Concrete Grade : M20 for all beams, columns, slab and staircase…

Steel Grade (for reinforcement) : Fe500

2.5 Design Basis

The building is designed following the standard codes and norms. The different
codes
used for the structural design are

i. IS456:2000 [Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete] for Design of
Concrete Structures. ii. IS1893:2002 [Criteria for earthquake resistant design of
structure] for Earthquake load calculation.
iii. IS875:1987 [Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for
buildings and structures] for Other Load calculation.
iv. SP16:1980 [Design aids for reinforced concrete to IS456:1978] for design of
the structural members.
v. IS13920:1993 [Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected
to seismic forces] for Ductile Detailing of the structural members.

3. LOADING

All loadings are derived bases on different parts of IS875. Earthquake load is calculated
based on IS1893:2000.

3.1 Dead Loads (DL)

These are the permanent load which is not supposed to change during the structure’s design
life. The dead loads included in the design are:
a. Self‐weight of the structure
i. RCC (beams and columns) : 25 KN/m3
ii. RCC (slab) : 25 KN/m3 iii.
Steel: 78.5 KN/m3
b. Wall‐loads

Page 6 of 49
 i. 2.4m full ht wall
9” wall=11kN/m
4” wall=6kN/m
(30% opening is considered wherever
necessary) ii. 1.0m parapet wall 4”
wall=2.5kN/m

c. Finishing on floors
i. Floors: 1 KN/m2 ii. Staircase:
1.0KN/m2

3.2 Live Loads (LL)

These are the loads that may vary its intensity and/or position during design life. Live
loads for different rooms and roofs are calculated as per the functional requirement as
specified in IS875 code.
a. Live loads on floor
i. Room: 2 KN/m2 ii. Balconies : 3
KN/m2
iii. Staircase: 3 KN/m2 iv. Lavatory (toilet): 2 KN/m2
b. Live loads on roof
i. Accessible roof: 1.5 KN/m2

3.3 Earthquake Loads (EL)

Earthquake load has been calculated based on IS1893:2000. Basically, horizontal seismic
forces shall be considered for the structures that depend on different parameters.
Different parameters for generating earthquake loads are:

a. Seismic Zone : V (as per classification if IS1893)

b. Zone Factor (Z) : 0.36
c. Importance Factor : 1 (for residential building)
d. Reduction Factor (R) : 5 (for SMRF)
e. Soil type : Medium
f. Spectral Acceleration (Sa/g) : depends on time period and soil type.
g. Hor. Seismic Coefficient (Ah) : . .
h. Seismic Weight of Bldg (Ws) : DL+0.25LL (for LL≤3) OR DL+0.5LL(for LL>3)
i. Base Shear (VB) : Ah * Ws
3.4 Load Combinations
Different load combinations are generated as per IS1893:2002, since earthquake load is
considered from same code. The load combinations are:

Page 7 of 49
 Load Combination Combination Name a. 1.5 (DL + LL)
: UDCON2
b. 1.2 (DL + LL +‐ EL)
i. 1.2 (DL + LL + ELx) :UDCON3
ii. 1.2 (DL + LL ‐ ELx) :UDCON4
iii. 1.2 (DL + LL + ELy) :UDCON5
iv. 1.2 (DL + LL ‐ ELy) :UDCON6
c. 1.5 (DL +‐ EL)
i. 1.5 (DL + ELx) :UDCON7
ii. 1.5 (DL ‐ ELx) :UDCON8
iii. 1.5 (DL + ELy) :UDCON9
iv. 1.5 (DL ‐ ELy) :UDCON10
d. 0.9 DL +‐ 1.5 EL
i. 0.9 DL + 1.5 ELx :UDCON11
ii. 0.9 DL ‐ 1.5 ELx :UDCON12
iii. 0.9 DL + 1.5 Ely :UDCON13
iv. 0.9 DL ‐ 1.5 Ely :UDCON14
where:

DL = Dead Loads

LL = Live Loads

EL = Earthquake load
ELx = Earthquake load in +ve x‐direction

ELy = Earthquake load in +ve y‐direction

4. DESIGN CRITERIA

The concrete structures are designed using Limit State Method which is incorporated in
IS456:2000.

4.1 Limit State Method

It is based on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design loads and design
strengths of the materials. These design loads and design strengths are obtained by applying
partial safety factors for characteristic loads and strengths of the materials as concrete and
steels.

The limit state method of design covers different criteria for design. The two major criteria are

a. Limit State of Collapse:

The limit state of collapse of the structure or part of the structure could be assessed
from rupture of one or more critical sections and from buckling due to elastic or plastic

Page 8 of 49
 instability (including effects of sway where appropriate) or overturning. The resistance
to bending, shear, torsion and axial loads at every section shall not be less than the
appropriate value at that section produced by the probable most unfavourable
combination of loads on the structure using the appropriate partial safety factors.
b. Limit State of Serviceability:
It includes limit for deflection and cracking or local damage. Excessive deflection and
cracks adversely affects the finishes, efficiency and appearance of the structure and it
may impair protection to embedded reinforcements too.
Cracking Limit state: the surface width of the cracks should not, in general, exceed
0.3mm in members where cracking is not harmful and does not have any serious
adverse effects upon the preservation of the reinforcing steel nor upon the durability of
the structure.
Deflection limit states for concrete members are:
i. The final deflection due to all loads including the effects of temperature, creep and
shrinkage and measured from the as‐cast level of the supports of floors, roofs and
all other horizontal members, should not normally exceed span/250
ii. The deflection including the effects of temperature, creep and shrinkage occurring
after erection of partitions and the application of finishes should not normally
exceed span/350 or 20mm whichever is less.

5. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE

The structure is modelled in SAP2000 v 19

Three Dimensional Views

Page 9 of 49
Figure 3‐D view of building

Page 10 of 49
5.1 Grids and Node Numbers at Base Level

Page 11 of 49
5.2 Columns and Beams Sections

Page 12 of 49
5.3 Loading on the structure

MASONARY WALL LOAD IN BEAMS

Page 13 of 49
 STAIR DEAD LOAD IN BEAMS

STAIR LIVE LOAD IN BEAMS

NOTE:

• The loads on slab like Live load, Floor Finish,Internal wall etc. are assigned as code and
the values are mentioned at earlier pages.
• The parapet wall load in beams is calculated and assigned with values 2.5KN/m.

Page 14 of 49
 6. ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE

The structure is analysed in SAP2000 non linear version 19. Different analysis outputs are
shown.

6.1 Support Reactions

Joint reactions at Footing Level

Page 15 of 49
 6.2 BMD,SFD,AFD,Torsion DIAGRAM (ENVELOPE)

MOMENT 3-3

V 2-2

Page 16 of 49
AXIAL FORCE

Page 17 of 49
TORSION

Page 18 of 49
Page 19 of 49
TABLE: Modal Periods And Frequencies

TABLE: Auto Seismic Loads To Horizontal Diaphragms

 Page 19 of 43

7. DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE

7.1 Design of Columns and Beams

Analysis and design of the structure is done by SAP2000 non linear version 19 The required
longitudinal reinforcement of the column and beam are as follows:

Page 20 of 43
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT PLAN VIEW

FIRST FLOOR

Page 22 of 49
 SECOND FLOOR

ROOFFLOOR LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT Y-Z VIEW

Page 23 of 49
A-A

B-B

Page 24 of 49
C-C

D-D

Page 25 of 49
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT X-Z VIEW

1-1

Page 26 of 49
Page 27 of 49
Page 28 of 49
 Project
CRITICAL BEAM
Job Number
Engineer

Page 29 of 49
SAP2000

Page 30 of 49
 Indian IS 456-2000 BEAM SECTION DESIGN Type: Ductile Frame Units: N, mm, C
(Summary)

L=4445.000
Element : 26 D=355.000 B=230.000 bf=230.000 Station Loc : 4295.000
ds=0.000 dct=25.000 dcb=25.000
Section ID : beam E=22360.680 fc=20.000 Lt.Wt. Fac.=1.000
Combo ID : UDCON9 fy=500.000 fys=500.000

Gamma(Concrete): 1.500
Gamma(Steel) : 1.150

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
-45832171 3586836.394 73198.358 91122.260

Design Moments, Mu3

Factored Torsion Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
-45832171 5366494.349 0.000 -51198665

Longitudinal Reinforcement for Moment and Torsion (Mu3, Tu)

Required +Moment -Moment Minimum
Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
Top (+2 Axis) 414.155 0.000 414.155 175.272
Bottom (-2 Axis) 207.077 0.000 0.000 207.077

Shear Reinforcement for Shear and Torsion (Vu2, Tu)

Rebar Shear Shear Shear Shear
Asv/s Ve Vc Vs Vp
0.578 87663.717 43825.366 68790.256 36437.047

Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion and Shear (Tu, Vu2)

Rebar Torsion Shear Core Core
Asvt/s Tu Vu b1 d1
0.456 3586836.394 73198.358 200.000 325.000

Page 31 of 49
 7/14/2017 1:25 PM
Project
CRITICAL COLUMN
Job Number
Engineer

Page 32 of 49
SAP2000

Page 33 of 49
 Indian IS 456-2000 COLUMN SECTION DESIGN Type: Ductile Frame Units: N, mm, C
(Summary)

L=2870.200
Element : 81 B=300.000 D=300.000 dc=56.000
Station Loc : 2870.200 E=22360.680 fc=20.000 Lt.Wt. Fac.=1.000
Section ID : col fy=500.000 fys=500.000
Combo ID : UDCON10 RLLF=1.000

Gamma(Concrete): 1.500
Gamma(Steel) : 1.150

AXIAL FORCE & BIAXIAL MOMENT DESIGN FOR Pu, Mu2, Mu3
Rebar Design Design Design Factored Factored
Area Pu Mu2 Mu3 Mu2 Mu3
1170.338 60893.677 9194291.225 43875241.2 9194291.225 43875241.2

AXIAL FORCE & BIAXIAL MOMENT FACTORS

K L Initial Additional Minimum
Factor Length Moment Moment Moment
Major Bending(M3) 1.000 2870.200 17550096.47 0.000 1217873.549
Minor Bending(M2) 1.000 2870.200 -4801892.5 0.000 1217873.549

SHEAR DESIGN FOR Vu2,Vu3

Rebar Shear Shear Shear Shear
Asv/s Vu Vc Vs Vp Major Shear(V2)
0.333 29616.070 46108.408 29280.000 25977.599
Minor Shear(V3) 0.333 23574.763 46108.408 29280.000 23574.763

JOINT SHEAR DESIGN (INFORMATIVE ONLY)

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint
Ratio VTop VuTot Vc Area Major Shear(V2) 0.262
0.000 105422.575 0.402 90000.000
Minor Shear(V3) 0.237 0.000 95256.496 0.402 90000.000

(1.1) BEAM/COLUMN CAPACITY RATIOS (INFORMATIVE ONLY)

Major Minor Ratio
Ratio
0.550 0.499

Page 34 of 49
 7/14/2017 1:16 PM

BEAM REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED

REINFORCEMENT
STOREY END INTERMEDIATE
TOP BUTTOM TOP BUTTOM
2‐16Ø TH +1‐16Ø EXT 2‐16Ø TH +1‐12Ø EXT 2‐16Ø TH 2‐16Ø TH
First Floor Beam
603 mm2 515 mm2 402 mm2 402 mm2

2‐16Ø TH +1‐16Ø EXT 2‐16Ø TH +1‐12Ø EXT 2‐16Ø TH 2‐16Ø TH

Second Floor Beam 2 2 2
603 mm 515 mm 402 mm 402 mm2

Roof Floor, Plinth & 2‐12Ø TH 2‐12Ø TH 2‐12Ø TH 2‐12Ø TH

Foundation Beam 226 mm 2
226 mm2 226 mm 2
226 mm2
STIRRUPS: S1: 8mm @100 mm C/C
S2: 8mm @ 150 mm C/C

COLUMN REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED

STOREY REINFORCEMENT AREA (mm2)

First storey
C1 1257
4‐16mm + 4‐12mm
(12"*12")
Second storey
C1 (12"*12") 4‐16mm + 4‐12mm 1257

Page 35 of 49
 Third storey
1257
C1 (12"*12") 4‐16mm + 4‐12mm

Slab Design

Slab thickness t 125 mm Sunken Depth 325 mm

Concrete fck fy 20 MPa Sunken Slab
Steel 500 MPa Load

Loading
Slab Load

Dead Load DL3.125 KN/m

Dead Load DL 3.125 Total LoadFiller Loadm5 KN/m
Live Load LL KN/m
WskFL11.74 KN/
FF+WALL Load WL 2.000 3.0 KN/m
Factored Load WskuLive
KN/m 1.0 KN/m
Load LL18 KN/m
2.500 Finishes Load WL
KN/m
Total Load Ws 7.625 KN/m
Slab Factored Load Wsu 11 KN/m
Slab Type Data
Regular
Longer Span 11
(ly) KN/m
Shorter Span 1.00
(lx) 4.44 m

Loading on edges one

way two way w*lx/2.=(w*lx/2) + (1-(1/3)*(lx/ly)
Wlonger 17 KN/m .= 4.44+
m
Wshorter 17 KN/m
Load
ly/lx ratio
one waytwo way
Moments .=w*lx2/ 8=αx * w*lx2 Slab type
Mx 13 KN-m
.=αy
My 13 KN-m

.=Mulim > Mux or Muy .= 5*W*l4/(384EI)

2 )
Thickness Check OK
.=w*lx/3
Refer art 4 SP Astx16
Deflection 16 mm
Ch Area of
pg 51-80 Steel 298 sqmm

Spacing required in mm *
8# 10#
x y x y x
169 c/c 169 c/c 264 c/c 264 c/c 380 c/c w*lx2
.=ast of bar*1000/ast req
Final Ast x y
provided Asty
8# 150 c/c 8
pg 298 sqmm

Page 36 of 49
 21or

Refer Table 5-44 SP 16

12# 16#
y x x
380 c/c 676 c/c 676 c/c

# 150 c/c

Page 37 of 49
 DOG ‐LEGGEED STAIRCASE DESIGN
RA RB

Thickness
floor to of waist Total
T1 L1 F1 L2 T2 Fw g Fw Riser Tread floor ht(H) slab(t) depth(D) T3 T4
0.23 0 1.42 1 0.23 1 0.05 1 0.175 0.25 2.86 0.106 0.127 0.23 0.23
t= (1/20 to 1/25)of span

Page 38 of 49
 Load per m horizontal width
In going portion In Landing portion
Total
load
on Total
going load on
Factore landing Factore
per
d load per d load
meter
on meter on
Effect Self wt Self wt of hor.
Total going hor. landing
ive of waist waist slab Wt of FF Wt of Dead L.L Width portion Width( portion
Span( slab(w'g) on plan(wg) steps(wst) steps(wf) load(wd ) (kN/ (W) (wu)kN/ L.L W) (wu)kN/
l)m kN/m kN/m kN/m kN/m kN/m m2) kN/m m Wg Wf Total(wd) (kN/m2) kN/m m
2.65 3.175 3.8755814 2.1875 1 7.0631 3 10.06 15.095 3.175 1 4.175 3 7.175 10.7625

Page 39 of 49
fck Xu lim
20 Fe250 Fe415 Fe500
0.53d 0.48d 0.46d
0.1325 0.12 0.115

Page 40 of 49
Page 41 of 49
 394 KN
289 KN
3 KN-m

-4 KN-m
1 Footing Size Design F3

Load
Design Load Moment in x dir Moment in y dir

Column size 300 mm

Pu P 300 mm
SBC Mux 1.93 sqmm
Muy
Footing Size required
cx cy q 150 KN/sqm
Footing Size Provided
127 KNm2 1.50 meters
A req
Area Provided Net
upward pressure L

B 1.50 meters
A prvd 2.25 meters

Zx 0.56
Zx 0.56

Nup

Footing Size OK

0.600
0.600
34 KN-m

34 KN-m
2 Slab Design
lx ly

Bending Moment in x dir Mx

Bending Moment in y dir My

Concrete fck 20 MPa

Steel fy
500 MPa

Page 42 of 49
 Ast across x direction 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 905 sqmm
324 KN
Ast across y direction 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 905 sqmm
0.245 MPa
1.118 MPa
Design Of Isolated Footing
2 of 3 3 One Way
45 Shear
KN along x direction
0.067 MPa
Vu1 ζv
0.260 MPa
1477 KN
ζc
Vc1

One Way Shear Check OK One

173 KN
Way Shear along y direction

4 Vu1 ζv

ζc
Vc1

One Way Shear Check OK

Two Way Shear

Vu2 ζv ks*ζc Vc1

Two Way Shear Check OK

5

Page 43 of 49
 Design Of Isolated Footing 3 of 3
L= 1.50 meters

300

B=1.50 meters

200 mm

12 mm dia@ 125 mm c/c 12 mm dia@ 125 mm c/c

Design Of Isolated Footing

Page 44 of 49
2 of 3

3 One Way Shear along x direction

Vu1 ζv

ζc
Vc1

One Way Shear Check OK One

Way Shear along y direction

4 Vu1 ζv

ζc
Vc1

One Way Shear Check OK

471 KN
0.356 MPa
Two Way Shear
1.118 MPa
Vu2 ζv ks*ζc Vc1
97 KN
0.121 MPa Two Way Shear Check OK
5
0.260
1477 MPa
KN

208 KN

Page 45 of 49
 Design Of Isolated Footing 3 of 3
L= 1.80 meters

300

B=1.80 meters

200 mm

12 mm dia@ 125 mm c/c 12 mm dia@ 125 mm c/c

DESIGN A STRAP FOOTING when the external column is very near or on the property line Given:
fck 20 n/mm² fy 500 n/mm²
Bearing capacity of soil‐ fb 150 kn/m²
Boundry column‐A
la la 304.8 mm
ba ba304.8 mm
Column‐B
lb

Consider
Factored load 1m width of slab
on col.A 263 kn 1000 mm
Max. Ultimate
Factored moment
load on col.B 26.049794 Kn‐m
500 kn
Required‐d1 Provided depth‐d1 d2 97.151073 mm
c/c distance bet. Columns 4.44 m
lb304.8 mm bb bb304.8 mm 450 mm
(a) Proportioning of the Base mm For drawing
200 mm
Working load on col.A 175.33333 kn Not factored
Working load on col.B 333.33333
355 kn Not factored Let the width of strap beam‐
bmm For Self wt. Of footing‐10%(PA+PB) 50.866667 kn drawing
Total working load 559.53333 kn
Required area of footing‐Af 3.7302222 m²
Lf1 0.921115 m
Use dia of
Provide 12
Providedwidth
Lf1 of footing‐Bf 1.5
1.5 m
m
steel
Cantilever
Lf2 projection of slab beyond beam 0.5725
0.9868148 mm
0.15 0.2
Provided Lf2 1.7 m
Area provided‐Af 4.8 m²
Total ultimate load from columns 763 Kn
Upward intensity of soil pressure ‐Pu/Af Page 46 of 49 158.95833 Kn/m²
(b) Design of footing slab
max. Width of column 304.8 mm
 8
d1
0.25 0.3
d2
6
Provided 3
effective depth‐ 9
d1 4

m
m

Bf
Required‐Ast 153.563
b1 63 mm² b2
spacing 736.1
Lf1 118 Lf2
mm
provide c/c dist 1 For
of bar 5 drawi
0 ng

m
m

Area tuc 75
provided 3.6
pt0.19126 m
9% m²

SF at the inner face of the col.A ‐190.3243 KN

SF at the edge E of the footing 94.65625 KN
SF at edge F 94.65625 KN
SF at the inner edge of col.B 260.99025 KN
SF at outer edge of col.B ‐166.334 KN
Point of zero SF from inner face D of col.A 0.7982144 M

MuK ‐104.9652 KN‐M Tension at top

MuE ‐86.17661 KN‐M
MuH 58.017299 KN‐M
MuG 43.591687 KN‐M
MuF ‐80.45781 KN‐M
Max hogging moment (nagative) 104.9652 KN‐M 0.3130152 N/mm²
Required depth d 333.40159 mm
Shear resisted by conc.‐Vuc 49.756379 KN
Vud 28.374063 KN < OK
Distribution steel:Requid.Ast 540 mm²
Assume dist. steel dia 12 mm spacing 209.33333 mm
Say 150 mm
(c) Design of strap Beam
Net upward pressure/ m length of beam‐wu 238.4375 KN/m Downward pressure under
col.Aw1 862.86089 KN/m
Downward pressure under col.B‐w2 1640.4199 KN/m

Page 47 of 49
 550

col‐A col‐B
Bf

b1 b2

Lf1 Lf2

0.6976

C D E F G H J

0.3048

Provide Total depth of beammm For drawing

Effective depth, d 500 mm
Required Ast at top 521.08325 mm²
Assume dia of bar 16 mm
no. of bars required 2.59297 nos
Provide 3 nos of 16 mm dia at top
Steel at bottom of beam 277.74466 mm²
Min.steel required 301.75 mm²
Provide 301.75 mm²
Assume dia of bar 16 mm
no. of bars required 1.5015426 nos
Provide 3 nos of 16 mm dia at bottom
Side face reinforcement 177.5 mm²
Assume dia of bar 12 mm
no. of bars required 1.5702406 nos
Provide 2 nos of 12 mm dia at both faces of beam
Design of Shear reinforcement:
Max shear at face of col.A 190.32425 KN pt 0.3396507 %
INTERPOLATION for tuc value
% steel τuc
Input heigher value from table 0.25 0.36
Input lower value from table 0.5 0.48
τuc 0.403032 N/mm²
Shear resisted by concrete 71.53824 KN Shear resisted by min.stirrups 71 KN
Shear to be resisted by vertical stirrups 118.78601 KN
Assume dia of stirrups 8 mm Assume legs of stirrups 2 Spacing s
183.98126 mm saymm zone of shear reinforcement 189.72645 mm
say 1m
100
provide 8 mm 2 legged stirrups for 1 m dist. From D to N
Min. shear reinforcement:
Assume dia of stirrups 8 mm Assume legs of stirrups 2 Spacing s 307.80845 mm

say provide 8 mm 2 legged stirrups for other dist.

150 mm

Page 48 of 49
 8. CONCLUSIONS
A Residential building has been fully designed using a computer program, SAP2000 nonlinear version 19.
All the required design details has been calculated and presented.

Best‐approach has been adopted for most‐economical design, yet fulfilling all the requirements
for important building. Due considerations has been given to all room requirements and
probable increase in load.

Reinforcements are quite satisfactory and they are so balanced for easier material handling and
concreting. Due attention has been made in reinforcement congestion and size and number of
bars are balanced for easiest and safest construction. In some places, more than required
reinforcement is provided for feasibility during construction.

During construction, it is mandatory to follow IS13920, regarding provision of stirrups and ties, development
lengths, splices and other detailing.

Page 49 of 49