Module 1 - SCM (18me653) PDF
Module 1 - SCM (18me653) PDF
MODULE 1
Introduction
The supply chain encompasses all activities involved in the transformation of goods
from the raw material stage to the final stage, when the goods and services reach the end
customer. Supply chain management involves planning, design and control of flow of
material, information and finance along the supply chain to deliver superior value to the
end customer in an effective and efficient manner. As can be seen from the definition, the
supply chain not only includes manufacturers, suppliers and distributors but also
transporters, warehouses and customers themselves.
Traditionally, firms have focused their energies on three main functions: purchasing,
manufacturing and distribution. Transport and storage activities within individual functions
and across functions have not received adequate attention, and have usually been handled
by the department managing the logistical aspects of the company. Initially, supply chain
management focused on the internal integration of activities in these three functional areas
with the logistics function. Gradually, firms realized that these activities have to be
coordinated, not just within a firm, but across the entire supply chain, keeping in mind the
material/product flow, right from the vendor to the end customer. To integrate material
flow across the chain, information and financial flow across the chain also have to be
integrated. As shown in Figure 1.1, a typical supply chain involves managing all the three
flows in the chain.
1. The First Revolution (1910–1920): Vertical Integrated Firms Offering Low Variety
of Products.
The first major revolution was staged by the Ford Motor Company where they had
managed to build a tightly integrated chain. The Ford Motor Company owned every part
of the chain right from the timber to the rails. Through its tightly integrated chain, it could
manage the journey from the iron ore mine to the finished automobile in 81 hours.
Ford innovated and managed to build a highly efficient, but inflexible supply chain
that could not handle a wide product variety and was not sustainable in the long run.
General Motors, on the other hand, understood the demands of the market place and offered
a wider variety in terms of automobile models and colours. Ford’s supply chain required a
long time for set-up changes and, consequently, it had to work with a very high inventory
in the chain. Till the second supply chain revolution, all the automobile firms in Detroit
were integrated firms. Even traditional firms in India, like Hindustan Motors, were highly
integrated firms where the bulk of the manufacturing was done in-house.
Gradually, when Toyota and other Japanese firms tried to set up assembly plants in
different parts of the world, they realized that they would have to take their suppliers also
along with them. In actual practice, the Toyota supply chain also had certain rigidities, such
as a permanent relation with suppliers, which could become a liability over a period of
time. This, in turn, led to the third revolution spearheaded by couple of progressive
companies like Dell Computers, Apple Inc., and Bharti Airtel, which offered, it customers
the luxury of customization with loosely held supplier networks.
Dell computers allows customers to configure their own laptops (in terms of
processors, video cards, screen sizes, memory, etc.) and track the same in their production
and distribution systems. Apple offers personal digital devices to its customers and iPod is
a classic example. However, it is not just about the product. Apple allows the consumer to
have a personalized user experience through the features and services. Users can
personalize the music and other media content on their device through the various features
available on iPod. Similarly, Bharti Airtel allows services like My Airtel through which
customer can have unique personalized experience.
In summary, we have moved from single product (Model T black colour) to wide
variety as offered by Toyota to customization as offered by companies such as Dell
computers, Apple, and Bharti Airtel. Organizations have moved from offering products to
offering user experiences, which are a bundle of goods and services selected by the user.
This has changed the way supply chains are configured to deliver value.
Manufacturing managers decide where to locate the company based on the costs of
production. That's led to a lot of jobs outsourcing in technology to India and China.
Many call centers have outsourced to India and the Philippines.
Natural disasters are becoming an increasing threat that can disrupt any part of the supply
chain. The United Nations Refugee Agency reported their frequency has doubled in the
last 20 years due to global warming. The impact on local productivity can last decades after
an event. If a disaster is bad enough, it can slow global growth. In 2011, Japan's
earthquake and the resultant tsunami created the most damage to the world's supply of
automobiles, electronics, and semiconductor equipment. The wings, landing gears, and
other major airline parts are also made in Japan, so the quake disrupted the production
of Boeing's 787 Dreamliner. U.S. gross domestic product slowed in 2011 as 22 Japanese
auto part plants suspended production.
4. Shift in power structure in the chain. In every industry, the entities closer to customers
are becoming more powerful. With increasing competition, a steadily rising number of
products are chasing the same retail shelf space. Retail shelf space has not increased at the
pace at which product variety has increased. So there have been cases of retailers asking
for slotting allowance when manufacturers introduce new products in the market place.
Savvy firms have started talking about trade marketing and treating dealers and retailers as
their customers while simultaneously trying to woo the retailers aggressively. There is a
clear shift in the power structure. Retailers have realized that they are powerful entities in
the chain and hence expect the manufacturers to be more responsive to their needs and
demands. Discount retailers like Wal-Mart have been asking their suppliers to replenish
the supplies on a daily basis based on actual sales data from their point-of-sales systems.
In general, manufacturers are forced to respond more quickly to the customers’ demands,
because of changes in the power structure within the chain.
5. Globalization of manufacturing. Over the past decade, tariff levels have come down
significantly. Many companies are restructuring their production facilities to be at par with
global standards. Unlike in the past, when firms use to source components, produce goods
and sell them locally, now firms are integrating their supply chain for the entire world
market. For example, companies like ABB have developed some global centers of
excellence for each of their product lines that take care of the global market. General
Motors is talking about a world car and has been designing a few cars for global markets.
In the telecommunications and electronics industry, companies usually get their chips from
Taiwan, test them in Europe and finally integrate them with other products in the United
States of America to sell in the international market. This has made managing supply chains
extremely complicated. Unlike information and finance flow, which can be managed
electronically, materials and products have to move physically, and as this movement can
even be across continents, managing supply chains is now an extremely complex issue.
Supply Chain Operation: The time horizon here is weekly or daily, and during this phase
companies make decisions regarding individual customer orders. At the operational level,
supply chain configuration is considered fixed, and planning policies are already defined.
The goal of supply chain operations is to handle incoming customer orders in the best
possible manner. During this phase, firms allocate inventory or production to individual
orders, set a date that an order is to be filled, generate pick lists at a warehouse, allocate an
order to a particular shipping mode and shipment, set delivery schedules of trucks, and
place replenishment orders. Because operational decisions are being made in the short term
(minutes, hours, or days), there is less uncertainty about demand information. Given the
constraints established by the configuration and planning policies, the goal during the
operation phase is to exploit the reduction of uncertainty and optimize performance.
The design, planning, and operation of a supply chain have a strong impact on
overall profitability and success. It is fair to state that a large part of the success of firms
like Wal-Mart and Dell can be attributed to their effective supply chain design, planning,
and operation.
Pull and push systems in the supply chain process view are presented in the above figure. These
systems determine as to when to respond to customer order with minimal supply chain cost.
Processes in a pull system are executed when a customer order arrives at the retailer. The retailer
then fulfills the order based on actual demand. In basic terms, a customer pulls inventory from the
retailer’s shelf. While the push system does the opposite. Processes are executed in response to
forecast and speculation based on demand signal. Push system enables the supplier to push
inventory closer to the customer to compensate for demand variability.
Supplier
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
However, given the complexities in today’s supply chain, players above need to be enabled with
additional capabilities to survive. The chain must extend to accommodate other supply chain
participants. The extended supply chain is where supplier’s suppliers are added in the upstream
side and customer’s customers on the downstream supply chain. These providers help the
company’s supply chain more secure and agile. They provide a range of needed solutions to all
participants in the supply chain. For instance, an IT company provides an ERP system to the
business extending its capability from real-time information sharing to global compliance to
customer analytics. We will look at how your shirt gets to the retail shelf and ultimately to you as
the end user.
The figure above shows that it took several steps to move one material to the next until a shirt
becomes available in the retail shelf for the customer to buy. Simply put, a shirt travels from
different levels of processes and players within the supply chain network. Supplier tier 2 has its
supply chain so as tier 1, the manufacturer and so on. Each of them manages its activities adding
value to the creation of a shirt. That illustration unlocks basic understanding about the supply
chain.
However, as illustrated in Figure 1.4, firms must recognize the nature of trade-offs between the
supply chain cost (marginal cost) and customer service. If a firm wants to improve its performance
on the customer service front, it must accept deterioration in performance on the cost front and
vice versa. For example, if a pizza company delivering pizzas in 40 minutes wants to deliver in 20
minutes, its costs would increase. An efficient frontier, shown in Figure 1.4, provides a lower
envelope, below which a firm cannot choose to operate. Efficient firms can choose to operate on
any point of the efficiency frontier.
Fig. 1.5: (a) Revenue impact of service level (b) Profit impact of service level.
A company will need to conduct market research to determine the revenue and contribution
potential of increased customer service. Further, customer profitability analysis must be carried
out to identify the right market segments. Similarly, while planning sales promotions, marketing
and supply chain strategists should work together to ensure that the supply chain is well equipped
to handle any additional demand in a profitable way. Thus, well-managed firms always consider
marketing and supply chain decisions in tandem, and not independently.
Shorter lead time, higher responsiveness, higher reliability and higher product variety lead to better
customer service. Improvement in performance on any of these four fronts will result in higher
costs. Depending on customer expectations and product characteristics, different dimensions of
the supply chain have varying levels of impact on the overall value of customer service.
Fig. 1.6: Interaction between supply chain lead time and delivery lead time.
As shown in Figure 1.6, a typical firm sources material, manufactures components, assembles the
product and delivers the finished product to the end customer, with each of these activities having
a certain lead time. If we aggregate all the four lead times, we get the supply chain lead time, which
is the total time required for the supply chain to carry out all activities from the beginning to the
end.
A critical characteristic of the supply chain is the customer order penetration point or decoupling
point. There are essentially three types of supply chains characterized by the customer order
penetration point: make to stock (MTS), make to order (MTO) and configure to order (CTO).
Figure 1.7 is a conceptual representation of these three types of supply chains. If customers expect
their order (an order can either be a formal document or even an informal instruction, e.g., a
customer asking a retailer for a tube of tooth paste is treated as an order) to be fulfilled
instantaneously, then the supply chain is in the MTS business. If the supplier gives enough time to
the firm to assemble the product before delivery, it is in the CTO business. If the customer gives
enough time to the manufacturer to carry out the complete set of operations (source, make,
assemble and deliver) after placing the order, it is in the MTO business. Typically, firms in the
consumer products business operate on an MTS basis where the customer expects the products to
be on the shelf at the retailer’s outlet. Equipment manufacturers typically operate with an MTO
supply chain where all the activities are started after getting the order. A firm in the pizza home
delivery business is in the CTO business, because your pizza is configured the way you want, with
the toppings of your choice, using ingredients kept in readiness, prior to an order. CTO is also
known as assemble to order (ATO) or build to order (BTO) business model.
Push–Pull Boundary of the Supply Chain : Order delivery lead time also can be used for
drawing a push–pull boundary of the supply chain. All the processes in the supply chain are divided
into two categories based on their position in a supply chain with respect to the customer order
point. As shown in Figure 1.8, all the processes carried out before the customer order point are
managed through the push approach, and all the processes carried out after the customer order are
managed through the pull approach. The interface between the push-based processes and the pull-
based strategy is known as the push–pull boundary. All the processes managed by pull approaches
do not face any uncertainty because they are carried out against specific orders. As they are
executed against specific customer orders, they operate on customer pull and, hence, are known as
pull based processes. On the other hand, processes prior to the customer order are executed based
on forecast, and as there is no known customer pull in this case, these activities are pushed within
the chain; thus, they are known as push-based processes.
The inventory at the push–pull boundary is used to decouple the push and the pull
processes. Firms like Asian Paints and Dell Computers are able to assemble and deliver a wide
variety of finished goods demanded by the end customer from relatively few components stocked
at the push–pull boundary. In MTS supply chains, the push–pull boundary is at the end of chain
and all processes are managed using the push approach. In MTO supply chains, all processes are
managed using the pull approach and the push–pull boundary is located at the beginning of the
chain. In CTO supply chains, the push–pull boundary is usually positioned after component
manufacturing.
Responsiveness
Responsiveness captures the firm’s ability to handle the uncertainty of market demand. In addition
to delivery lead time, supply chains have also been characterized on the basis of the nature of
demand uncertainty faced by products in the market place. Based on the nature of demand
uncertainty, products can be classified as functional products or innovative products. Functional
products (grocery) are those that satisfy the basic needs of a customer and therefore have low
variety, stable and predictable demand, long life cycles and low profit margins. Innovative
products (fashion and technology products) are those that try to satisfy a broad range of customers’
wants and have the following features: high variety, unstable and very-hard-to-predict demand,
short life cycles, high profit margins and frequent stock-outs and markdowns. See below table, for
details on the differences of various aspects of demand for different product categories.
Physical function is the process of converting materials into parts, then to finished products and
then transporting them across the various stages of the chain. Relevant costs incurred are due to
production, transportation and inventory storage. The market mediation function ensures that the
variety of products reaching the market matches the needs of the customers. Relevant costs
incurred are due to demand supply mismatch, resulting in either obsolescence or lost sales and
dissatisfied customers. In the case of functional products, the focus is on meeting predictable
demand cost effectively, while for innovative products, the focus is on meeting unpredictable
demand cost effectively. As shown in Figure 1.9, firms must ensure an appropriate match between
the type of supply chain and the nature of product characteristics.
Delivery Reliability
As discussed in the earlier section, delivery lead time is an important dimension of customer
service, and delivery reliability essentially captures the degree to which a firm is able to service its
customers within the promised delivery time. Delivery reliability measures the fraction of
customer demand that is satisfied within the promised delivery lead time. For firms operating on
an MTS model, the percentage of orders getting served from the stock is known as product
availability, also commonly referred to as service level in supply chain literature. Similarly, for
companies offering products based on the CTO or MTO model, delivery reliability captures the
percentage of orders that are delivered within the promised delivery lead time. Given the nature of
demand and supply uncertainty, it is obviously more expensive to provide higher levels of service.
Essentially, firms have to tradeoff inventory costs and stock-out costs to arrive at the optimum
service level. In the MTS business, a firm has to keep higher inventory if it is to offer higher levels
of service. Firms in the CTO business will have to hold higher inventory before the order
penetration point and after that slack capacity in the system if they want to offer higher delivery
reliability to customers. Firms in the MTO business will have to work with slack capacity in the
entire system if they want to offer high delivery reliability. In general, firms will have to arrive at
an optimal trade-off between cost (costs related to high inventory and slack capacity) and service
level while deciding on this issue. In the industrial products category, performance on the delivery
reliability front is monitored and the supplier is usually chosen based on performance on this front.
Product Variety
The quantum of variety offered by a firm is an important dimension of customer service. In the
past couple of years, a “variety explosion” has taken place in most product categories. Higher
product variety offers greater choices to the customer who is likely to get a product that fits closest
to his or her actual requirements. Some firms like Dell Computers and National Panasonic go to
the extent of allowing their customers to design their own products. Obviously, higher variety
would lead to greater complexity, resulting in higher supply chain costs. Some firms have found
that variety explosion has affected firm profitability in an adverse way. Firms like P&G have
worked on product rationalizations and have reduced overall product variety. While deciding the
optimum level of product variety, a firm has to manage trade-offs with other dimensions of
customer service like order lead time. For example, if you go to a fast food outlet, you know there
is less variety but expect food to be served in a few minutes; in a restaurant, you are ready to wait
for 15–20 minutes but do expect a greater variety.
chain terms so that meaningful supply chain benchmarking can be carried out. It has developed
the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model as the industry standard for supply chain
management. Several supply chain software vendors have adopted the SCOR performance
measures in their performance management module. SCOR recognizes six major processes: Plan,
Source, Make, Delivery, Return, and Enable. As per the SCOR model, supply chain performance
measures fall under the following five broad categories:
• Cost
• Assets (Asset Management Efficiency)
• Reliability
• Responsiveness
• Agility