Test Series: April, 2021

MOCK TEST PAPER 2

FINAL (NEW) COURSE
PAPER 1: FINANCIAL REPORTING
ANSWERS
1. (a) Balance Sheet of Master Creator Private Limited as at 31 st March, 20X2
Particulars Working/ (Rs.)
Note
reference
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 1 49,87,750
Capital work-in-progress 2 20,01,600
investment Property 3 15,48,150
Financial assets
Other financial assets (Security deposits) 4,62,500
Other non-current assets (capital advances) 4 17,33,480
Current assets
Inventories 5,98,050
Financial assets
Investments (55,000 + 5,000) 5 60,000
Trade receivables 6 7,25,000
Cash and cash equivalents 7 1,16,950
Other financial assets 8 1,27,370
Other current assets (Prepaid expenses) 8 90,000
TOTAL ASSETS 1,24,50,850
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity share capital A 10,00,000
Other equity B 28,44,606
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
8% Convertible loan 11 60,60,544
Long term provisions 5,24,436
Deferred tax liability 12 2,20,700
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables 13 6,69,180
Other financial liabilities 14 1,19,299
Other current liabilities (TDS payable) 15 81,265

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Current tax liabilities 9,30,820
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 1,24,50,850
Statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 st March, 20X2
A. Equity Share Capital
Balance (Rs.)
As at 31 st March, 20X1 10,00,000
Changes in equity share capital during the year -
As at 31 st March, 20X2 10,00,000
B. Other Equity
Retained Equity Total
Earnings component of (Rs.)
(Rs.) Compound
Financial
Instrument
(Rs.)
As at 31 st March, 20X1 21,25,975 - 21,25,975
Total comprehensive income for the year
(25,00,150 + 5,000 - 85,504- 21,25,975) 2,93,671 - 2,93,671
Issue of compound financial instrument
during the year - 4,24,960 4,24,960
As at 31 st March, 20X2 24,19,646 4,24,960 28,44,606
Disclosure forming part of Financial Statements:
Proposed dividend on equity shares is subject to the approval of the shareholders of the
company at the annual general meeting and not recognized as liability as at the Balance Sheet
date. (Note 9)
Notes/ Workings: (for adjustments/ explanations)
1. Property, plant and equipment are tangible items that: (a) are held for use in the
production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for administrative
purposes; and (b) are expected to be used during more than one period. Therefore, the
items of PPE are Buildings (Rs. 37,50,250) and Vehicles (Rs. 12,37,500), since those
assets are held for administrative purposes.
2. Property, plant and equipment which are not ready for intended use as on the date of
Balance Sheet are disclosed as “Capital work-in-progress”. It would be classified from
PPE to Capital work-in-progress.
3. Investment property is property (land or a building—or part of a building—or both) held
(by the owner or by the lessee as a right-of-use asset) to earn rentals or for capital
appreciation or both, rather than for:
(a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes;
or
(b) sale in the ordinary course of business.
Therefore, Land held for capital appreciation should be classified as Investment property
rather than PPE.
2

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 4. Assets for which the future economic benefit is the receipt of goods or services, rather
than the right to receive cash or another financial asset, are not financial assets.
5. Current investments here are held for the purpose of trading. Hence, it is a financial
asset classified as FVTPL. Any gain in its fair value will be recognised through profit or
loss. Hence, Rs. 5,000 (60,000 – 55,000) increase in fair value of financial asset will be
recognised in profit and loss.
6. A contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity is a
financial asset. Trade receivables is a financial asset in this case and hence should be
reclassified.
7. Cash is a financial asset. Hence it should be rec lassified.
8. Other current financial assets:
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Interest accrued on bank deposits 57,720
Royalty receivable from dealers 69,650
Total 1,27,370
Prepaid expenses does not result into receipt of any cash or financial asset. However, it
results into future goods or services. Hence, it is not a financial asset.
9. As per Ind AS 10, ‘Events after the Reporting Period’, If dividends are declared after the
reporting period but before the financial statements are approved for issue, the dividends
are not recognized as a liability at the end of the reporting period because no obligation
exists at that time. Such dividends are disclosed in the notes in accordance with Ind AS 1 ,
Presentation of Financial Statements.
10. ‘Other Equity’ cannot be shown under ‘Non-current liabilities’. Accordingly, it is
reclassified under ‘Equity’.
11. There are both ‘equity’ and ‘debt’ features in the instrument. An obligation to pay cash
i.e. interest at 8% per annum and a redemption amount will be treated as ‘financial
liability’ while option to convert the loan into equity shares is the equity element in the
instrument. Therefore, convertible loan is a compound financial instrument.
Calculation of debt and equity component and amount to be recognised in the
books:
S. No Year Interest amount @ Discounting factor @ Amount
8% 10%
Year 1 20X2 5,12,000 0.91 4,65,920
Year 2 20X3 5,12,000 0.83 4,24,960
Year 3 20X4 5,12,000 0.75 3,84,000
Year 4 20X5 69,12,000 0.68 47,00,160
Amount to be recognised as a liability 59,75,040
Initial proceeds (64,00,000)
Amount to be recognised as equity 4,24,960

* In year 4, the loan note will be redeemed; therefore, the cash outflow would be
Rs. 69,12,000 (Rs. 64,00,000 + Rs. 5,12,000).

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Presentation in the Financial Statements:
In Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended on 31 March 20 X2
Finance cost to be recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss Rs. 5,97,504
(59,75,040 x 10%)
Less: Already charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss (Rs.5,12,000)
Additional finance charge required to be recognised in the Statement
of Profit and Loss Rs. 85,504

In Balance Sheet as at 31 March 20X2

Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Other Equity (8% convertible loan) 4,24,960
Non-current liability
Financial liability [8% convertible loan – [(59,75,040+ 5,97,504– 60,60,544
5,12,000)]

12. Since entity has the intention to set off deferred tax asset against deferred tax liability and
the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off taxes, hence their balance on net basis
should be shown as:
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Deferred tax liability 4,74,850
Deferred tax asset (2,54,150)
Deferred tax liability (net) 2,20,700
13. A liability that is a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to
another entity is a financial liability. Trade payables is a financial liability in this case.
14. ‘Other current financial liabilities’:
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Wages payable 21,890
Salary payable 61,845
Interest accrued on trade payables 35,564
Total 1,19,299
15. Liabilities for which there is no contractual obligation to deliver cash or other financial
asset to another entity, are not financial liabilities. Hence, TDS payable should be
reclassified from ‘Other current financial liabilities’ to ‘Other current liabilities’ since it is
not a contractual obligation.
(b) The loans from ABC Bank carry interest @ 10% and 12% for 5 year term and 3 year term
respectively. Additionally, there is a processing fee payable @ 1% on the principal amount on
date of transaction. It is assumed that ABC Bank charges all customers in a similar manner
and hence this is representative of the market rate of interest.
Amortised cost is computed by discounting all future cash flows at market rate of interest.
Further, any transaction fees that are an integral part of the transaction are adjusted in the
effective interest rate and recognised over the term of the instrument.

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Hence loan processing fees shall be reduced from the principal amount to arrive the value on
day 1 upon initial recognition.
Fair value (5 year term loan) = 10,00,000 – 10,000 (1% x 10,00,000) = 9,90,000
Fair value (3 year term loan) = 8,00,000 – 8,000 (1% x 8,00,000) = 7,92,000.
Now, effective interest rate shall be higher than the interest rate of 10% and 12% on 5 year
loan and 3 year loan respectively, so that the processing fees gets recognised as interest over
the respective term of loans.
2. (a) Calculation of discounting factor based on yield @ 6% p.a.
Date Spot rate at Forward rate for Discount factor @ 6%
indicated 30th September p.a. on quarter basis
date 20X1
1st April, 20X1 76 0.971
30th June 20X1 74 0.985
30th September, 20X1 72 71 1
Determination of fair value change
1st April, 30th June, 30th September,
20X1 20X1 20X1
a Nominal value in Rs. @ Rs. 76 / USD 7,600 7,600 7,600
b Nominal value in USD (100 kg for USD
100) 100 100 100
c Forward rate for 30 th September, 20X1 76 74 71
d Value in Rs. (b x c) 7,600 7,400 7,100
e Difference (a-d) 0 200 500
f Discount factor (as calculated in the
above table) 0.971 0.985 1
g Fair value (e x f) 0 197 500
h Fair value change for the period 0 197 303*
* 500 – 197= 303
Journal Entries
Date Particulars Dr. Cr.
1st April, 20X1 No entry as initial fair value is zero
30th June, 20X1 Future Contract Dr. 197
To Cash Flow Hedge Reserve (Other Equity)- OCI 197
(Being Change in Fair Value of Hedging Instrument
recognised in OCI accumulated in a separate component
in Equity)
30th September, Future Contract Dr. 303
20X1 To Cash Flow Hedge Reserve (Other Equity) - OCI 303
(Being change in fair value of the hedging instrument
recognised in OCI)
30th September, Bank/Trade Receivable Dr. 7,200

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 20X1 To Revenue from Contracts with Customers 7,200
(Being sale of 100 kgs. of copper for USD 100
recognised at spot rate of Rs. 72 for USD 1)
30th September, Cash Flow Hedge Reserve (Other Equity) - OCI Dr. 500
20X1 To Revenue from Contracts with Customers 500
(Being fair value change in forward contract reclassified
to profit and loss and recognised in the line item affected
by the hedge item)
30th September, Bank / Cash Dr. 500
20X1 To Future Contract 500
(b) In the given case, Lessee calculates the ROU asset and the lease liabilities before
modification as follows:
Lease Liability ROU asset
Year Initial Lease Interest Closing Initial Depreciation Closing
value payments expense @ balance Value balance
8%
a b c = a x 8% d = a-b + c e f g
1 4,02,600* 60,000 32,208 3,74,808 4,02,600 40,260 3,62,340
2 3,74,808 60,000 29,985 3,44,793 3,62,340 40,260 3,22,080
3 3,44,793 60,000 27,583 3,12,376 3,22,080 40,260 2,81,820
4 3,12,376 60,000 24,990 2,77,366 2,81,820 40,260 2,41,560
5 2,77,366 60,000 22,189 2,39,555 2,41,560 40,260 2,01,300
6 2,39,555 2,01,300
* Initial value of ROU asset and lease liability = Annual lease payment x annuity factor @ 8%
= 60,000 x 6.71 = Rs. 4,02,600
At the effective date of the modification (at the beginning of Year 6), Lessee remeasures the
lease liability based on:
(a) a five-year remaining lease term,
(b) annual payments of Rs. 35,000 and
(c) Lessee’s incremental borrowing rate of 6% p.a.
Present value of modified lease = Annual lease payment x annuity factor @ 6% = 35,000 x
4.212 = 1,47,420
Lessee determines the proportionate decrease in the carrying amount of the ROU Asset on the
basis of the remaining ROU Asset (i.e., 3,000 square metres corresponding to 50% of the
original ROU Asset).
50% of the pre-modification ROU Asset (Rs. 2,01,300) is Rs. 1,00,650
50% of the pre-modification lease liability (Rs. 2,39,555) is Rs. 1,19,777.50.
Consequently, Lessee reduces the carrying amount of the ROU Asset by Rs. 1,00,650 and the
carrying amount of the lease liability by Rs. 1,19,777.50. Lessee recognises the difference
between the decrease in the lease liability and the decrease in the ROU Asset
(Rs. 1,19,777.50 – Rs. 1,00,650 = Rs. 19,127.50) as a gain in profit or loss at the effective
date of the modification (at the beginning of Year 6).

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Lessee recognises the difference between the remaining lease liability of Rs. 1,19,777.50 and
the modified lease liability of Rs. 1,47,420 (which equals Rs. 27,642.50) as an adjustment to
the ROU Asset reflecting the change in the consideration paid for the lease and t he revised
discount rate.
3. (a) Consolidated Balance Sheet of David Ltd as on 1 st April, 20X1 (Rs. in lakh)
Amount
Assets
Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment 850.00
Investment 500.00
Current assets:
Inventories 400.00
Financial assets:
Trade receivables 600.00
Cash and cash equivalents 350.00
Others 600.00
Total 3,300.00
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share capital - Equity shares of Rs. 100 each 514.00
Other Equity 1,067.49
Non Controlling Interest 173.70
Non-current liabilities:
Financial liabilities:
Long term borrowings 500.00
Long term provisions (100+80+23.81) 203.81
Deferred tax 11.00
Current liabilities:
Financial liabilities:
Short term borrowings 300.00
Trade payables 520.00
Provision for law suit damages 10.00
Total 3,300.00
Working Notes:
a. Fair value adjustment- As per Ind AS 103, the acquirer is required to record the assets
and liabilities at their respective fair value. Accordingly, the PPE will be recorded at
Rs. 450 lakh.
b. The value of replacement award is allocated between consideratio n transferred and post
combination expense. The portion attributable to purchase consideration is determined
based on the fair value of the replacement award for the service rendered till the date of
the acquisition. Accordingly, Rs. 3 lakh (6 x 2/4) is considered as a part of purchase
7

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 consideration and is credited to David Ltd equity as this will be settled in its own equity.
The balance of Rs. 3 lakh will be recorded as employee expense in the books of Parker
Ltd over the remaining life, which is 1 year in this scenario.
c. There is a difference between contingent consideration and deferred consideration. In the
given case, Rs. 30 lakh is the minimum payment to be paid after 3 years and accordingly
will be considered as deferred consideration. The other element is if company meet
certain target then they will get 25% of that or Rs. 30 lakh whichever is higher. In the
given case, since the criteria is the minimum what is expected to be paid, the fair value of
the contingent consideration has been considered as zero. The impact of time value on
deferred consideration has been given @ 8%.
d. The additional consideration of Rs. 25 lakh to be paid to the founder shareholder is
contingent to him/her continuing in employment and hence this will be considered as
employee compensation and will be recorded as post combination expenses in the
income statement of Parker Ltd.
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Purchase Consideration Rs. in lakh
Particulars Amount
Share capital of Parker Ltd. 400
Number of shares 4,00,000
Shares to be issued 2:1 2,00,000
Fair value per share 50
Purchase consideration (2,00,000x70%xRs. 50 per share) (A) 70.00
Deferred consideration after discounting Rs. 30 lakh for 3 years
@ 8% (B) 23.81
Replacement award - Market based measure of the acquiree award
ie Fair value of original award (6) x ratio of the portion of the
vesting period completed (2) / greater of the total vesting period (3)
or the original vesting period (4) of the acquiree award ie (6 x 2 / 4)
(C) 3.00
Purchase consideration (A+B+C) 96.81
2. Allocation of Purchase consideration
Particulars Book Fair FV
value value adjustment
(A) (B) (A-B)
Property, plant and equipment 600 450 (150)
Investment 200 200 -
Inventories 100 100 -
Financial assets: -
Trade receivables 200 200 -
Cash and cash equivalents 200 200 -
Others 300 300
Less: Financial Liabilities
Long term borrowings (300) (300) -
Long term provisions (80) (80) -
8

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Deferred tax (55) (55) -
Financial Liabilities
Short term borrowings (170) (170) -
Trade payables (320) (320) -
Contingent liability - (10) (10)
Net assets (X) 675 515 (160)
Deferred tax asset on fair value adjustment
(160 x 40%) (Y) 64 160
Net assets (X+Y) 579
Non-controlling interest (NCI)
(579 x 30%) rounded off 173.70
Capital reserve (Net assets – NCI – PC) 308.49
Purchase consideration (PC) 96.81
3. Computation of Consolidated amounts of consolidated financial statements
David Parker Ltd. PPA Total
Ltd. (pre- Allocation
acquisition)
Assets
Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment 400 600 (150) 850
Investment 300 200 500
Current assets:
Inventories 300 100 400
Financial assets:
Trade receivables 400 200 600
Cash and cash equivalents 150 200 350
Others 300 300 600
Total 1,850 1,600 (150) 3300
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share capital- Equity shares 500
of Rs. 100 each
Shares allotted to Parker Ltd.
(2,00,000 x 70% x Rs. 10 per 14 514
share)
Other Equity
Other Equity 700 700
Replacement award 3 3
Security premium
(2,00,000 shares x 70% x Rs. 40) 56 56
Capital reserve 308.49 308.49
Non-controlling interest 0 173.70 173.70

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Non-current liabilities:
Financial Liabilities
Long term borrowings 200 300 500
Long term provisions 100 80 23.81 203.81
Deferred tax 20 55 (64) 11
Current liabilities:
Financial Liabilities
Short term borrowings 130 170 300
Trade payable 200 320 0 520
Liability for lawsuit damages 10 10
Total 1,850 925 525 3,300
(b)
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Fair value as at 1 st April, 20X1 13,750
Increase due to Price change [250 x {60 - (13,750/250)}] 1,250
Increase due to Physical change [250 x {75-60}] 3,750
Fair value as at 31 st March, 20X2 18,750
4. (a) Calculation of the liability and equity components on 6% Convertible debentures:
Present value of principal payable at the end of 4 th year (Rs. 1,80,000 thousand x 0.74)
= Rs. 1,33,200 thousand
Present value of interest payable annually for 4 years (Rs. 1,80,000 thousand x 6% x 3.31)
= Rs. 35,748 thousand
Total liability component = Rs. 1,68,948 thousand
Therefore, equity component = Rs. 1,80,000 thousand – Rs. 1,68,948 thousand
= Rs. 11,052 thousand
Calculation of finance cost and closing balance of 6% convertible debentures
Year Opening balance Finance cost Interest paid Closing
Rs. in ’000 @ 8% @ 6% balance
Rs. in ’000 Rs. in ’000 Rs. in ’000
a b = a x 8% c d=a+b-c
31.3.20X2 1,68,948 13,516 10,800 1,71,664
31.3.20X3 1,71,664 13,733 10,800 1,74,597
Finance cost of convertible debentures for the year ended 31.3. 20X3 is Rs. 13,733 thousand
and closing balance as on 31.3.20X3 is Rs. 1,74,597 thousand.
Calculation of Basic EPS Rs. in ’000
Profit for the year 39,000
Less: Dividend on preference shares (80,000 thousand x Rs. 0.05) (4,000)
Profit attributable to equity shareholders 35,000
Weighted average number of shares = 20,00,00,000 + {5,00,00,000 x (9/12)}

10

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 = 23,75,00,000 shares or 2,37,500 thousand shares
Basic EPS = Rs. 35,000 thousand / 2,37,500 thousand shares
= Rs. 0.147
Calculation of Diluted EPS Rs. in ’000
Profit for the year 39,000
Less: Dividend on preference shares (80,000 x 0.05) (4,000)
35,000
Add: Finance cost (as given in the above table) 13,733
Less: Tax @ 25% (3,433.28) 10,300
45,300
Weighted average number of shares = 20,00,00,000 + {5,00,00,000 x (9/12)} + 10,00,00,000
= 33,75,00,000 shares or 3,37,500 thousand shares
Diluted EPS = Rs. 45,300 thousand / 3,37,500 thousand shares
= Rs. 0.134
(b)
Particulars Year 20X0-20X1 Year 20X1-20X2
Annual Salary Rs. 30,00,000 Rs. 30,00,000
No. of working days (A) 300 days 300 days
Leaves Allowed 10 days 10 days
Leaves Taken (B) 7 days 13 days
Therefore, No. of days worked (A – B) 293 days 287 days
Expense proposed to be recognized by Rs. 30,00,000 Rs. 30,00,000
Infotech Ltd.
Based on the evaluation above, Mr. Niranjan has worked for 6 days more (293 days –
287 days) in 20X0-20X1 as compared to 20X1-20X2.
Since he has worked more in 20X0-20X1 as compared to 20X1-20X2, the accrual concept
requires that the expenditure to be recognized in 20X0-20X1 should be more as compared to
20X1-20X2.
Thus, if Infotech Ltd. recognizes the same expenditure of Rs. 30,00,000 for each year, it would
be in violation of the accrual concept.
The expenditure to be recognized will be as under:
Particulars Year 20X0-20X1 Year 20X1-20X2
Annual salary (A) Rs. 30,00,000 Rs. 30,00,000
No. of working days (B) 300 days 300 days
Salary cost per day (A ÷ B) Rs. 10,000 per day Rs. 10,000 per day
No. of days worked (from above) 293 days 287 days
Expense to be recognised:
In 20X0-20X1:Rs. 30,00,000 + [Rs. 10,000 per
day x 3 days (leaves unutilized expected to be Rs. 30,30,000
utilized subsequently)]
In 20X1-20X2:Rs. 30,00,000 – [Rs. 10,000 per
day – 3 days (excess leave utilized in Rs. 29,70,000
20X1-20X2)]

11

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Journal Entry for 20X0-20X1
Employee Benefits Expense Account Dr. 30,30,000
To Bank Account 30,00,000
To Provision for Leave Encashment 30,000
Journal Entry for 20X1-20X2
Employee Benefits Expense Account Dr. 29,70,000
Provision for Leave Encashment Account Dr. 30,000
To Bank Account 30,00,000
5. (a) In the instant case, the quarterly net profit has not been correctly stated. As per Ind AS 34,
Interim Financial Reporting, the quarterly net profit should be adjusted and restated as follows:
(i) The treatment of bad debts is not correct as the expenses incurred during an interim
reporting period should be recognised in the same period. Accordingly, Rs. 50,000
should be deducted from Rs. 20,00,000.
(ii) Recognising additional depreciation of Rs. 4,50,000 in the same quarter is correct and is
in tune with Ind AS 34.
(iii) Treatment of exceptional loss is not as per the principles of Ind AS 34, as the entire
amount of Rs. 28,000 incurred during the third quarter should be recognized in the same
quarter. Hence Rs. 14,000 which was deferred should be deducted from the profits of
third quarter only.
(iv) As per Ind AS 34 the income and expense should be recognised when they are earned
and incurred respectively. As per para 39 of Ind AS 34, the costs should be anticipated or
deferred only when:
(i) it is appropriate to anticipate or defer that type of cost at the end of the financial
year, and
(ii) costs are incurred unevenly during the financial year of an enterprise.
Therefore, the treatment done relating to deferment of Rs. 5,00,000 is not correct as
expenditures are uniform throughout all quarters.
Thus, considering the above, the correct net profits to be shown in Interim Financial
Report of the third quarter shall be Rs. 14,36,000 (Rs. 20,00,000 -Rs. 50,000 - Rs.14,000
- Rs. 5,00,000).
(b) In determining the transaction price, Buildings Limited separately estimates variable
consideration for each element of variability ie the early completion bonus and the quality
bonus.
Buildings Limited decides to use the expected value method to estimate the variable
consideration associated with the early completion bonus because there is a range of possible
outcomes and the entity has experience with a large number of similar contracts that provide a
reasonable basis to predict future outcomes. Therefore, the entity expects this method to best
predict the amount of variable consideration associated with the early completion bonus.
Buildings Ltd.’s best estimate of the early completion bonus is Rs. 2.125 crore, calculated as
shown in the following table:

Bonus % Amount of bonus (Rs. in Probability Probability-weighted

crore) amount (Rs. in crore)
15% 3.75 25% 0.9375
12

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 10% 2.50 40% 1.00
5% 1.25 15% 0.1875
0% - 20% -
100% 2.125

Buildings Limited decides to use the most likely amount to estimate the variable consideration
associated with the potential quality bonus because there are only two possible outcomes
(Rs. 2 crore or Rs. Nil) and this method would best predict the amount of consideration
associated with the quality bonus. Buildings Limited believes the most likely amount of the
quality bonus is Rs. 2 crore.
Total variable consideration = 4.125 crore (2.125 crore + 2 crore).
(c) Paragraph 20 of Ind AS 115, inter alia, states that, “An entity shall account for a contract
modification as a separate contract if both of the following conditions are present:
(a) the scope of the contract increases because of the addition of promised goods or services
that are distinct (in accordance with paragraphs 26–30); and
(b) the price of the contract increases by an amount of consideration that reflects the entity’s
stand-alone selling prices of the additional promised goods or services and any
appropriate adjustments to that price to reflect the circumstances of the particular
contract.
In accordance with the above, it may be noted that a contract modification should be accounted
for prospectively if the additional promised goods or services are distinct and the pricing for
those goods or services reflects their stand-alone selling price.
In the given case, even though the remaining services to be provided are distinct, the
modification should not be accounted for as a separate contract because the price of the
contract did not increase by an amount of consideration that reflects the standalone selling
price of the additional services. The modification would be accounted for, from the date of the
modification, as if the existing arrangement was terminated and a new contract created (i.e. on
a prospective basis) because the remaining services to be provided are distinct.
AB Ltd. should reallocate the remaining consideration to all of the remaining services to be
provided (i.e. the obligations remaining from the original contract and the new obligations ).
AB Ltd. will recognise a total of Rs.4,20,000 (Rs.1,20,000 + Rs.3,00,000) over the remaining
four-year service period (one year remaining under the original contract plus three additional
years) or Rs.1,05,000 per year.
(d) Paragraph 41 of Ind AS 8 states as follows: “Errors can arise in respect of the recognition,
measurement, presentation or disclosure of elements of financial statements. Financial
statements do not comply with Ind AS if they contain either material errors or immaterial errors
made intentionally to achieve a particular presentation of an entity’s financial position, financial
performance or cash flows. Potential current period errors discovered in that period are
corrected before the financial statements are approved for issue. However, material errors are
sometimes not discovered until a subsequent period, and these prior period errors are
corrected in the comparative information presented in the financial statements for that
subsequent period.”
In accordance with the above, the reclassification of expenses from finance costs to other
expenses would be considered as correction of an error under Ind AS 8. Accordingly, in the

13

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 financial statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2, the comparative amounts for the
year ended 31 st March 20X1 would be restated to reflect the correct classification.
Ind AS 1 requires an entity to present a third balance sheet as at the beginning of the
preceding period in addition to the minimum comparative financial statements if, inter alia, it
makes a retrospective restatement of items in its financial statements and the restatement has
a material effect on the information in the balance sheet at the beginning of the preceding
period.
In the given case, the retrospective restatement of relevant items in statement of profit and
loss has no effect on the information in the balance sheet at the beginning of th e preceding
period (1 st April 20X0). Therefore, the entity is not required to present a third balance sheet.
6. (a) Ind AS 102 defines grant date and measurement dates as follows:
(a) Grant date: The date at which the entity and another party (including an employee) agree
to a share-based payment arrangement, being when the entity and the counterparty have
a shared understanding of the terms and conditions of the arrangement. At grant date the
entity confers on the counterparty the right to cash, other assets, or equity instruments of
the entity, provided the specified vesting conditions, if any, are met. If that agreement is
subject to an approval process (for example, by shareholders), grant date is the date
when that approval is obtained.
(b) Measurement date: The date at which the fair value of the equity instruments granted is
measured for the purposes of this Ind AS. For transactions wit h employees and others
providing similar services, the measurement date is grant date. For transactions with
parties other than employees (and those providing similar services), the measurement
date is the date the entity obtains the goods or the counterparty renders service.
Applying the above definitions in the given scenarios following would be the conclusion
based on the assumption that the approvals have been received prospectively:
Scenario Grant date Measureme Base for grant date Base for
nt date measurement date
(i) 30th June, 30th June, The date on which the For employees, the
20X1 20X1 scheme was approved measurement date is
by the employees grant date
(ii) 1st April, 30th July, The date when the entity The date when the
20X1 20X1 and the counterparty entity obtains the
entered a contract and goods from the
agreed for settlement by counterparty
equity instruments
(iii) 30th 30th The date when the For employees, the
September, September, approval by measurement date is
20X1 20X1 shareholders was grant date
obtained

(b) Items impacting the Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1 (Rs.)
Current service cost 1,75,000
Gains and losses arising from translating the monetary assets in foreign 75,000
currency
Income tax expense 35,000
Share based payments cost 3,35,000

14

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Items impacting the other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1 (Rs.)
Remeasurement of defined benefit plans 2,57,000
Changes in revaluation surplus 1,25,000
Gains and losses arising from translating the financial statements of a foreign
operation 65,000
Gains and losses from investments in equity instruments designated at fair
value through other comprehensive income 1,00,000

(c) (a) A Ltd. has entered into an arrangement wherein against the borrowing, A Ltd. has
contractual obligation to make stream of payments (including interest and principal). This
meets definition of financial liability.
(b) Let’s compute the amount required to be settled and any differential arising upon one time
settlement at the end of 6 th year –
 Loan principal amount = Rs. 10,00,000
 Amount payable at the end of 6 th year = Rs. 12,54,400 [10,00,000 x 1.12 x 1.12
(Interest for 5 th & 6th year in default plus principal amount)]
 One time settlement = INR 13,00,000
 Additional amount payable = Rs. 45,600
The above represents a contractual obligation to pay cash against settlement of a financial
liability under conditions that are unfavorable to A Ltd. (owing to additional amount p ayable in
comparison to amount that would have been paid without one time settlement). Hence the
rescheduled arrangement meets definition of ‘financial liability’.
(d) Either
The major changes in Ind AS 2 vis-à-vis AS 2 with respect to following are as follows:
(i) Machinery Spares: AS 2 explains that inventories do not include spare parts, servicing
equipment and standby equipment which meet the definition of property, plant and
equipment as per AS 10, Property, Plant and Equipment. Such items are accounted for in
accordance with AS 10. Ind AS 2 does not contain specific explanation in respect of such
spares as this aspect is covered under Ind AS 16.
(ii) Subsequent Assessment of Net Realisable Value (NRV): Ind AS 2 provides detailed
guidance in case of subsequent assessment of net realisable value. It also deals with the
reversal of the write-down of inventories to net realisable value to the extent of the
amount of original write-down, and the recognition and disclosure thereof in the financial
statements. AS 2 does not deal with such reversal.
(iii) Cost Formulae: AS 2 specifically provides that the formula used in determining the cost of
an item of inventory should reflect the fairest possible approximation to the cost incurred
in bringing the items of inventory to their present location and condition whereas Ind AS 2
does not specifically state so and requires the use of consistent cost formulas for all
inventories having a similar nature and use to the entity.
OR

15

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

 Determining whether a good or service represents a performance obligation on its own or is
required to be aggregated with other goods or services can have a significant impact on the
timing of revenue recognition. While the customer may be able to benefit from each promised
good or service on its own (or together with other readily available resources), they do not
appear to be separately identifiable within the context of the contract. That is, the promised
goods and services are subject to significant integration, and as a result will be treated as a
single performance obligation.
This is consistent with a view that the customer is primarily interested in acquiring a single
asset (a water purification plant) rather than a collection of related components and services.

16

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India