Detail Project Report

Integrated Watershed
Management Programme –III

BAGPAT (IWMP-III BAGPAT)
DETAIL PROJECT REPORT (DPR)
Submitted by:
BSA RAMGANGA COMMAND
PROJECT, MEERUT, U.P.
Department of Land Resources,
Ministry of Rural Development,
Government of India
DETAIL PROJECT REPORT (DPR) OF
Integrated Watershed Management Programme –III BAGPAT
(IWMP-III BAGPAT)
Submitted by
BSA RAMGANGA COMMAND PROJECT
MEERUT
Department of Land Resources,

Ministry of Rural Development,
Government of India
BLOCK : BINAULI
TEHSIL : BARAUT
DISTRICT : BAGPAT
2
Contents
S. No. Particular Page No.
1 Executive summary 5
2 Introduction 7
3 Project Objective 7
4 Basic information 8
5 Village wise detail of watershed 13
6 Demographic feature 14
7 Land feature 24
8 Climatic and hydrological feature 29
9 Detail of existing livelihood for poor 23
10 PRA exercise social maps 33
11 Problem typology of the watershed 43
12 SWOT Analysis 45
13 Proposed land use 54
14 Socio economic analysis of the project 57
15 Planning process 63
16 Entry Point Activity 75
3
17 Estimate 76
18 Horticulture Development for Water Shed management 92
19 Farming System and Micro Enterprises 94
20 Estimate of Goat Unit for SHG 102
21 Drawing of NADEP compost structure 110
22 Demonstration 113
23 Pasture Management 122
24 Role of vegetative coverage in soil conservation work 123
25 Establishment of Farm Implement Center 128
26 Economic Analysis 129
27 Constitution of PIA, WDT, USER GROUP 131
28 Phasing of work financial & Physical 139
29 Work Calendar 146
30 Location (Road map) 148
31 Micro watershed map of Bagpat 149
4
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Bagpat-III
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The IWMP-III Bagpat watershed comprises of nineteen villages namely Grampanchayay – Pusar, Adampur, Adreeshpur,
Mangauli, Kanharh, Gangauli, Mojijabad Nagal, Dodhat, Chittamkheri, Nirpura, Teekari, Padla,Padli, Viddhyavati,Bamrauli,
Shahajahapur,Biral, block Bonauli of Bagpat district of Uttar Pradesh. This watershed has been identified by the state department
under
Integrated Watershed Management Programme scheme by proper prioritization of different parameters for watershed
selection Criteria. The watershed is located in the north of Bagpat district. It lies between longitude 770 7’30’’to 770 12’30’’
Latitude 290 22’30’’to29030’ (Code No. 2C6A3a3i. 2C6A3a3d. 2C6A3a3e. 2C6A3a3h. 2C6A3a3g. 2C6A3a3f. 2C6A3a4a.
2C6A3a4j. 2C6A3a4i. 2C6A3a4b. 2C6A3a4c. 2C6A3a4h. )Its altitude ranges from22Oto 236m above the mean sea level (MSL).
The total area of watershed is 7308.88 ha.
The climate of the region is characterized as arid to semi-arid with average annual rainfall less 650 mm annually with an
average of 35 rainy days. Out of which about 85 percent is received during the monsoon season from July to September. The area
receives very less rainfall in the winter season. Temperature ranges from as high as 440C in the May-June to as low as 20to30C during
December-January. The trend of rainfall is highly erratic and maximum water goes as runoff.
The topmost portion (western & northwest part) of the watershed is flat with occasional depressions. These soils are sandy,
sandy loam the soils of the flat area are loamy sand to sand with occasional thin layers of silt in small patches. The middle portion of
watershed is relatively flat land with fine soil texture. These soils are black in colour and are inherently high in fertility status. Soil
texture is silty clay loam particularly in depressions and loam in the elevated portion.
Agriculture is the main occupation of the dwellers of the watershed. The main crops raised are wheat, sugarcane, mustard,
gram, bar sesame and pearl millet. Most of the lands are kept fallow during the kharif season. Mustard and wheat are the most
preferred crops grown during the rabi season. About 38% area under agriculture is cropped during kharif season in the watershed.
Among various crops bajra shares maximum area (25%), followed by sesame (10%), jowar (5%) and pulses i.e. black gram and green
gram (2%).
5
Natural vegetation of the watershed is very poor. The forest vegetation is predominant with Vilayati Babul (Prosopis juliflora)
followed by Babul (Acacia nilotica). There are occasional occurrence of Neem plants (Azadirachta indica), Papdi (Holopteila
integrifolia), Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo), Karanj (Pongamia glabra) and Chonkra (Prosopis cineraria). There is no grass land in the
watershed. Grass patches are seen only on the bunds, road sides and other such places. The principal grasses are Anjan grass, Munj
and Gandher.
The problem of erosion of the watershed is to be tackled by harvesting additional water in existing water harvesting structures,
which have lost most of their capacity due to siltation and creating new water bodies. Water stored in the water harvesting structures
shall be properly recycled to provide supplemental irrigation at critical growth stages of crops and for the establishment of fruit
orchards and forest trees. In agricultural land will treated with buding along with minor leveling. Waste land will be treated with the
engineering measures like staggered trenches and a forestation etc.
BUDGET FOR THE VARIOUS COMPONENTS IS GIVEN BELOW:
S. No. Budget Component Total (Lakhs)
A MANAGEMENT COSTS 12% 59.93
B PREPARATORY PHSES 10%
49.944
C WATERSHED WORKS
a. WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT WORKS 50%
249.72
b. LIVILIHOOD PROGRAMME(Community based) 10%
49.944
c. PRODUCTION SYATEM AND MICRO ENTERPRISES 13%
64.973
D CONSOLIDATION PHASE 5%
24.972
G. TOTAL
499.440
1. Watershed area 7308.88 ha
2. Rain fed area 4625.00 ha
3. Treatable area 4162.00 ha
4. Total expenditure on project 499.44 lakes
6
Introduction
IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed with Code No. (Code No. 2C6A3a3i. 2C6A3a3d. 2C6A3a3e. 2C6A3a3h. 2C6A3a3g.
2C6A3a3f. 2C6A3a4a. 2C6A3a4j. 2C6A3a4i. 2C6A3a4b. 2C6A3a4c. 2C6A3a4h. ) , having area 4759.00 ha located in north-west
part of BAGPAT district of Uttar Pradesh has been taken up by,(PIA) Bhoomi Sanrakshan Adhikari Ramganga command
Project, Meerut ( UP) for development under National Watershed Development Project for Rain-fed Areas (NWDPRA) scheme
funded by Department of Land Resources Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India. The IWMP-III Bagpat watershed has
been also taken up program implementation comprising of development and management plan during next five years (2010-11 to 14-
15). The details of the project plan are described as follows.
Project Objectives:
1. Conservation, development and sustainable management of natural resources including
their uses.
2. Enhancement of agricultural production and productivity in a sustainable manner.
3. Restoration of ecological balance in the degraded and fragile rain-fed ecosystem.
4. Reduction in regional disparity between rain-fed and irrigated areas.
5. Creation of sustainable employment opportunities for the rural community for livelihood
security
7
Basic Information and Location:
Location of the watershed
Name of the district BAGPAT
Name of the Block Binauli, Baraut
Name of the Gram Panchayats Pusar ,Adampur, Idreeshpur, Kanharh, Gangauli, Mojijabad Nagal,
Dodhat, Nirpura, Teekari, Padla, Padli, Himtpur sujati, Bamrauli,
Viddhyavati,Shahajahapur,Biral,
Name of the habitations Chittamkheri, Mangrauli
Longitude 770 25’30’’to 770 22’30’’
Latitude 290 15’0’’to29012 0’
Elevation from MSL:
Highest Elevation in the watershed (above MSL) 235.00
Lowest Elevation in the watershed (above MSL) 220.00
Relief Height difference (m) 15.00
8
The IWMP-III Bagpat watershed in Binauli block of Bagpat district ( U.P.) is located on Meerut-Baraut high way about 40 km
from Bagpat and 20 km from Baraut Tahsil between longitude 770 25’30’’to 770 22’30’’ Latitude 290 15’0’’to29012 0’
Source: India. gov.in/maps/Fig 1.

Location of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed
9
Fig 2
10
Fig 3:Delineation of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed on toposheet
11
Area:
Total area of the watershed is 7308.88 ha treatable area 4162.00 ha
Shape:
The watershed shape is elongated type. The maximum length and width of the watershed are 11500 m and 3850 m, respectively
with the length: width ratio of 2.99 : 1
Physiographic:
The watershed is in the mid of the Krishna and Hindan river having precipitous slopes and drains into the river Hindan through
Drains stream near Varnava village. (Krasna > Hindan> Yamuna > Ganga) About 33.5 % of the watershed area has slope more than 6
% and upright ridges. The top of the watershed exhibits extremely precipitous and manifesting moderate to severe erosion class. The
lower portion of the watershed has moderate slopes (less than 2.3%). At the outlet of the watershed small gullies are noticed, covered
with sparse vegetation. Total 6 ( 1st order -2 numbers, 2nd order- 3 numbers and 3rd order -1 number) numbers of streams of
different orders are found in the watershed, with total stream length 202020 m. of Stream characteristics of the watershed are
presented in the Table .
Stream characteristics of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed
Stream order Stream Number Mean stream length (m)

1st order 2 510
2nd order 3 560
3rd order 1 950
Total 6 2020
12
IWMP-III BAGPAT
Area of
S.no. N0. of Micro micro Name Gram Panchayat
watershed watershed Pusar Adampur mangauli Idarisgpur Kanharh Mo.Nagal Gangauli Dodhat Chitmkheri Nirpura Teekari Him.sujti Padli Begmabad
1 2C6A3a3i 726.5668 130.14 67.99 99.10 178.25 251.08
2 2C6A3a3d 793.5392 253.43 210.62 179.39 150.10
3 2C6A3a3e 683.6970 226.22 457.47
4 2C6A3a3h 568.3095 78.06 415.15 75.11
5 2C6A3a3g 748.1759 683.10 65.10
6 2C6A3a3f 830.6675 196.51 266.70 367.45
7 2C6A3a4a 578.0250 294.86 123.57 159.60
8 2C6A3a4j 356.2245 74.00 135.23 147.00
9 2C6A3a4i 514.7664 225.00 289.76
10 2C6A3a4b 602.9255 335.26 267.66
11 2C6A3a4c 596.3393 486.23 110.10
12 2C6A3a4h 309.6500 184.55 125.10
Total 7308.89 383.57 356.67 278.49 376.32 415.15 653.98 561.56 1050.55 139.10 544.78 1506.92 537.36 253.36 251.08
Treated Area 4162.00 218.42 203.10 158.58 214.29 236.40 372.40 319.78 598.23 79.21 310.22 858.11 306.00 144.27 142.98
Total cost 499.44 26.21 24.37 19.03 25.72 28.37 44.69 38.37 71.79 9.51 37.23 102.97 36.72 17.31 17.16
4% 19.98 1.05 0.97 0.76 1.03 1.13 1.79 1.53 2.87 0.38 1.49 4.12 1.47 0.69 0.69
50% 249.72 13.11 12.19 9.52 12.86 14.18 22.34 19.19 35.89 4.75 18.61 51.49 18.36 8.66 8.58
13
1. Demographic feature:
Total population of project area having Twelve micro watersheds (contains) 18 villages and 86748 people and also average
family size 5.83 persons. Peoples are the most important resource for the project. These data details obtained from PRA exercise in
social mapping and house hold survey by WDT and watershed committee.
(a) Population
Out of the total population 86748 the watershed, a majority i.e. more than 75 % has farming as their major source of livelihood
followed by 18 % labour and 7 % service + business class.
Human population in the IWMP-III Bagpat watershed
Name of Grampanchayat
S. Particular
Begmaba Total
No.
Pusar Adamp Mangauli Idarisg Kanh Mo.Na Gangaul Dodhat Chitmkh Nirpur Teekar Him.sujti Padli d
ur pur arh gal i eri a i
1 No. of families 641 359 457 623 356 1632 1223 2385 199 2733 2238 935 642 455 14878
In watershed
2 Human 3849 2157 2285 3738 2140 8160 7343 14314 1195 16398 13429 5608 3852 2275 86748
population
3 Male 1991 1187 1256 2055 1177 4488 4038 7872 657 9018 7308 3084 2118 1251 47500
4 Female 1858 970 1029 1682 963 3672 3304 6442 537 7379 6131 2524 1733 1024 39248
Total 13819 2157 2285 3738 2140 8160 7343 14314 1195 16398 13429 5608 3852 2275 86748
Children 133 203 218 378 205 421 1286 1002 108 983 826 358 1348 155 7624
6 S.C.male 457 234 194 398 267 358 345 316 72 1008 316 322 658 265 5210
7 S.C.Female 373 191 156 325 198 257 283 258 59 825 259 257 539 212 4192
Total 830 425 350 723 267 615 629 574 132 1833 576 579 1197 477 9402
14
(b)Livestock Details:
Total livestock population of the watershed is 19281 Buffalo is preferred as milch animal compared to cow, but milk yield is
very low. Goats are also kept for milk as well as for meat purpose. The breakup of livestock population is as follows
1. Livestock population in IWMP-III Bagpat watershed
S.N. Type of Animals Existing Nos. Milk production Milk quantity sold Income generated per
(Ltrs/day) (Ltrs/day) annum (lac)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Cow 3556 3.5 889000 778.05
2 Buffalo 19281 6.5 115685 8445
3 Goat/sheep 1986 1 1898 123.91
4 Ox 185 - - -
5 He buffalo 2025 - - -
6 Poultry 12685 - - -
7 Piggery 584 - - -
8 Other animals (specify) - - - -
2. Village wise live stock detail
SNo. Villages Buffaloes Cows Bullocks Goat Hen Pig
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Pusar 943 345 25 23 - -
2 Adampur 336 95 55 110 - --
3 Idarish Pur 736 178 21 - 20 20
4 Kanhar 444 115 106 8 - -
5 Mojijabad Nagal 615 210 118 140 40 3
6 Dodhat 2406 632 110 120 150 110
7 Nipura 3120 834 229 995 300 100
8 Tikari 6278 546 1200 283 117 263
9 Himmat Pur ,Sujati 1275 173 25 110 12 -
10 Parli 1115 65 205 175 26 12
11 Gangauli 1355 253 91 10 - 73
12 Magrauli 477 100 25 10 20 3
13 Chittamkheri 181 110 - - - -
15
(c) Operational holding & socio-economic status:
The cauterization of the villagers according to their land holding is necessary for better targeting project benefits and selection
of stock holders for various activities. This will help in maintaining for focus on the poor and economic up-lift-ment.
S. Total No of Land Holding(ha) Annual Gross Income(Rs) Total

No. H.Hs BPL in Laces Area
Type Rain fed Irrigated
SC ST Others SC ST Others SC ST Others Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Marginal 5106 - 90.25 - 2124.45 - - 681.60 10.56 157.44 168 2224.82
(wet1.25acdry2.50ac) -
2 Small farmer 10393 - - - 921.90 - - 277.40 - 141.49 141.49 1885.69

(Wet2.5acdry 5.00ac) -
3 Big farmer 2794 - - 1014.44 - - 126.00 . 237.19 237.19 3198.37
-
4 Landless 2405 218 - - - - - . - . 0.003 -
16
Land holding
Majority of the farmers are in the category of marginal (< 1 ha) and small (1-2 ha) with average land holding of about 2.4 ha.
These small land holding are further scattered at different places, which makes cultivation very difficult. Distribution of farm families
according to the size of the land holdings are given in the following table:
Distribution of farm families according to their size of landings
Land
SN holding Adamp manga Kanha Mo.N Chitmk Him. Begma Total
Pusar ur uli Idarisgpur rh agal Gangauli Dodhat heri Nirpura Teekari .sujti Padli bad
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18
Marginal 63 61 45 107 1229 862 305 297 255 1124 361 93 96 5106
(wet1.25acdry 208
2.50ac)
2 Small 447 458 1077 495 618 1229 911 922 35 1465 2310 280 62 84 10393
farmer
(Wet2.5acdry
5.00ac)
3 Big farmer 32 21 94 254 34 201 185 695 16 380 610 160 51 61 2794
4 Landless 96 88 37 145 117 38 229 339 21 225 210 128 322 410 2405
5 Total 638 628 1416 929 876 2697 2187 2261 369 2325 4254 929 528 651 20698
6 S.C 115 70 35 92 97 118 121 223 30 215 90 336 8 16 1566

7 S.T. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
17
(d) Employment Generation
Labour migration in search of gainful employment is one of the major problems in the remote watershed in particular. Casual
employment opportunities to the tune of more than 1.855 lakes will be generated during the implementation of the project activities.
However, a change in the land use pattern and adoption of new enterprises is needed.
Migration: Seasonal migration is one of the key features of dry land area and draught prone region normally youth man and women
migrate to different places living behind them the old and children at home. These data obtained by WDT and Watershed committee
though PRA exercise and house hold survey.
S.No. No. of persons Distance of

migrating No. of days per Major reason(s) destination of Occupation Income from Remark
M F Total Year of migration Migration from migration Occupation
migration the village(km)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1865 452 2317 About 3month Not sufficient 40 Labour 3600/month -

work Work
Lower wages in
rural area than
urban area
18
(e) Details of CBOs already existing: People institution and platform are essential mechanism for participate development.
This institution empowers the communities and facilitates oriented planning and institution of project. These also ensure that the
implementation is in a transparent and essentials manner. There are 8 SHG existing.
SNo. Type Total no. CBOs N0. members No. of ST in each No. of SC in each No. of BPL in each No. of 0thers in Bank Linkage
of category category category each category
Group With With With To N0.of Amount
Only Only both tal Group M F Tota M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Tota SHGs (RS)
men women l l
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
2
(i)Landl 45 3 58 - - -* 14 8 22 - - - - - - 7 NA
ess 3
1 SHG 8 3 - 11 (ii)MF 173 63 - - - - - - - - - 58 - 63 11 NA
(iii)SF - - - - - - - - -
(iv)LF - - - - - - - - -
Total 8 3 - 11 263 3 121 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 NA
3
(i)Landl
ess - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 UGS - - - -
(ii)MF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(iii)SF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(iv)LF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 WUA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 VO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19
(f) Infrastructure facilites :
Infrastructure social factures

The availability of infrastructure and institution indicate the social capital at the villages. The watershed has moderate
communication facilities and all twelve villages are approachable through pacca road. Literacy rate in the watershed is very low
because all villages are having education up to junior high school. All the villages are electrified and have TV & telephonic
connection. Nearest small market is at Dadhat about 4-5 km and nearest big market of Baraut is about 20 km from the watershed.
Religious and ritual features are almost common as in other part of the U.P. Small land holding (average less than 2 ha) with large
family size (average7 person) and more than 45 % of the labour force of the total population living below poverty line indicate poor
socio economic status of the watershed community. However, strong community spirit among the villager’s show positive indication
for the success of any programmed to be implemented in participatory mode. Traditionally the entire village community participates in
the individual works. Soil map of one of the watershed village drawn by villagers themselves, depicting various village features is
shown in following table:
SNo. Type of Infrastructure No. / Quantity Status

1 2 3 4
1 Education institutions
• Angwady 65 Continue
• Primary school 20 Continue
• Secondary school 8 Continue
• Govt. collage - Continue
• Vocational institutions - -
2 Service institutions - -
• Bank 8 Continue
• Post office 7 Continue
20
• Primary Health care center 4 Continue
• Veterinary center 2 Continue
• Market / shanties 4 Continue
3 N0. of bore wells / pump sets(functional) 945 Continue
4 No. OF Milk collection center(union society,pvt.Agency, oters) 7 Continue
Total quantity of surplus milk na Continue
5 Road connectivity to main road by anal weather Road(yes/no) yes
6 Bus Facility (Yes/No) yes
7 No. of HHs provided electricity yes
8 Others specify (..........................................)
9 No. of HHs with Access to drinking water 1
10 Access to Agro Industries (Yes/No.) -
11 Any other facilities (specify..................................)
21
Venn diagram
In the Venn diagram, farmer’s perception was recorded for importance and role of different development
intuition in relation to infrastructure in the villages. Importance has been depicted with size of the circle and
role with distance from village circle
Post office
Block
Bank
Electricity Drinking
water source
IWMP III
Teekari
PHC
Pr. School
Market
Vet Hospital
Venn Diagram of village Teekari
22
2. Land features
(a) Land use pattern:
This information will provide the land use detail in the village area under forest tree cover pasture as follows should be known to
generate various solutions and obtains for the development of the selected project as well as watershed area. The watershed has
diversified land uses namely agriculture, waste land (open scrub), seasonal water bodies etc. The varied present land use and area
under different categories in watershed is shown in following Table. The mixed land use followed in the watershed is almost similar in
other parts of the UP. During PRA exercise, the villagers prepared land use.
Present land under different categories in the IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed
(Total category wise area of concern villages)
S.No Village Land uses (ha)

. Agricultural Waste land(all types) Seasonal water bodies Village, road etc. Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Pusar 339.906 43.675 7.432 10.331 401.344
2 Adampur 264.614 33.207 8.603 15.397 321.821
3 Idarish Pur 320.367 56.221 8.985 26.433 412.006
4 Kanhar 415.149 41.531 6.670 31.247 494.597
5 Mojijabad Nagal 653.986 23.015 4.056 28.050 709.107
6 Dodhat 1050.750 106.514 6.513 25.927 1189.704
7 Nipura 901.525 15.250 19.500 29.750 911.878
8 Tikari 1358.045 3.315 10.665 51.207 1423.232
9 Himmat Pur Sujati 427.263 53.770 12.298 26.300 519.631
10 Parli 260.892 16.172 4.017 32.668 313.749
11 Gangauli 461.00 40.106 3.083 19.372 473.561
12 Magrauli 418.256 15.651 4.235 6.238 394.380
13 Chittamkheri 139.039 60.478 0.954 3.633 204.104
14 Begmabad 452.235 7.561 5.156 2.058 467.104
Total 7308.88 514.466 102.167 308.611 8236.1274
23
(b) Details of CPR
Normally CPR community’s properties resources are given priority in planning and implementation the watershed project. In this
regard the type extends and area available for treatment is important from the planning prospective. These details have obtained by
secondary data through WDT and Watershed committee.
S. CPR Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha.)

No. Particulars Area owned/in possession of
Pvt. Govt. PRI Any other Pvt. Govt. PRI Any other
Persons (Sp.Dept.) (Pl.Specify) Persons (Sp.Dept.) (Pl.Specify)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Wasteland/Degrated land 2723.520 - 198.00 - 4022.817 - - -
2 Pastures 25.78 - - - 8.23 - - --
3 Orchards - - - - - - - -
4 Village Woodlot - - - - - - - -
5 Forest - 129.657 - - - 95.00 - -
6 Village Ponds/Tanks 346.00 - - - 23.69 - - -
7 Community Buildings 18.160 - - - 12.263 - - -
8 Weekly markets - - - - --- - - -
9 Permanent markets - - - - - - - -
10 Temples/Places of worship 4.372 - - - - - - -
11 Others (Pl. Specify) - - - - - - -
Total 3117.832 129.657 198.00 - 4067.00 95.00 - -
24
(c) Agriculture implements
These agricultural implement indicate the level of agriculture mechanization in the project area and availabilities of various farm
machinery and tools.
S.N. Implements Nos. Remarks
1 2 3 4
1 Tractor 210
2 Sprayers-manual/power 65
3 Cultivators/Harrows 185
4 Seed drill 16
(d) Crop classification:

Crops classification gives on idea how much area is in intensive cultivation and the scope for agriculture Development in single
cropped areas and the objective would be to provide food and employment security.
Crop Calendar: The present crop calendar in the watershed comprise of fallow-mustard, fallow-wheat, sugarcane-wheat, bajra-
mustard, wheat, mustard, jowar-wheat, jowar-mustard, black gram-wheat, black gram-mustard, green gram-wheat, green gram-
mustard, fallow-berseem etc. Fallow-mustard is the most prevailing crop rotations on the agricultural lands both in rain-fed and
irrigated conditions in the watershed. Organized vegetable cultivation, fruit plantation and traditional agro-forestry systems are
lacking widely in the watershed. The limited vegetable cultivation in the watershed is confined either to kitchen gardens or to the
irrigated conditions in a scattered manner on extremely small area with view to meet out the domestic demand for vegetables. The
cultivation of cash crops other than the mustard also lacks in the watershed
S.N. Crop Classification Area (Hact.)
1 2 3
1 Single Crop 1818.00
2 Double Crop 1250.00
3 Multiple Crop 1094.00
4 Relay Crops -
25
(e) Crops & cropping pattern:
Season wise, crop wise and whether they are irrigated area not detail obtained from resource mapping and revenue record
production and productivities and cost of cultivation is obtained through focus group discussion and secondary data of agricultural
statics for the concern project area.
S.N Season Crop Rain fed Irrigated Total

Sown
Area Product Product Cost of Area Produ Prod Cost of Area Produ Rat Prod Cost of
cultivatio cultivati e
(Hac ivity ion Hact. ctivity uction Hact. ctivity uction cultivation
n on Rs/
t.) (Kgs/Ha.) (Ton/yr (Kg/Ha) (Ton/yr) (Rs./Hac (Kg/Ha) ha (Ton/yr) (Rs./Hact
) (Rs./Hact. t
)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 Kharif Jwar 235 906 122.31 18120 12 1050 12.6 21000 147 978 20 134.91 19560
Maize 10 2300 23 36800 55 2430 133.65 38880 65 2365 16 156.65 37840
Arhar 55 980 53.9 58800 0 0 0 0 55 980 40 53.9 58800
Munge/urd 25 400 10 26000 5 450 2.25 29250 30 425 45 12.25 27625
Sugarcane 1746 610 1065.06 1525 290 700 203 1750 2036 655 2.5 1268.06 1638
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Rabi Wheat 1389 3669 5096.24 51366 124 4010 497.24 56140 1513 3839.5 14 5593.48 53753
Mustard 21 1000 21 24000 0 0 0 0 21 1000 24 21 24000
Berseem 15 2500 37.5 6250 15 2550 38.25 6375 30 4437.5 2.5 75.75 11094
Pea 10 1229 12.29 61450 0 - 0 0 10 1229 50 12.29 61450
3 Summer Tomato 0 0 0 - 12 1200 14.4 18000 12 1200 15 14.4 18000
Ladyfinger 0 0 0 - 5 1250 6.25 18750 5 1250 15 6.25 18750
Cucurbits 15 1050 15.75 15750 15 1050 15 15.75 15750
Total 3478 684 - - 4162
26
(f) Soil Classification
Sail type, slope and erosion status are the critical for the planning soil and water conservation. These details obtained by
transect of the project area and soil sampling.
Fine textured alluvial soils
These soils are the most extensive soil group found in the Binauli IWMP-III Bagpat watershed. The middle portion of
watershed is relatively flat land with fine soil texture. These soils are Yellow in colour and are inherently high in fertility status. These
yellow soils are calcareous and on drying develop numerous some and fissures. Soil texture is silty clay loam particularly in
depressions and loam in the elevated portion. The soils of the lower horizon are invariably heavier than the surface, being a zone of
compaction and invariably a zone of chikni mitty in the form of hard soil, A subsurface indurate pan of clay or mixtures of both
locally called as chikni mitty soils are prevalent, which impede the downward movement of water thereby creating problems of high
runoff.
Coarse textured alluvial soils
These soils are lying mostly near the adjoining areas of Krishna River near the outlet and around the lower portion of river
down steam of watershed. These soils are coarser in texture and are relatively poor in fertility status. The soils are loamy sand in
texture. These soils also occupy significant area of the watershed.
So. Soil Type Total Based on Depth (cms) Based on Slop (%) (Mention Area Erosion
No. extent (Mention area in Hact.) in Hact. (mention area in Hact.)
(Hact.
) V.Shallo Shallow Moderatly Deep Very Nearly Moderat Strong steep Water Win
w (7.5-22.5) d (45.0- deep Level e slope (>15) d
(0-75) eed (22.5- 90.0) (>90) (0-2) e slope (6-15) Sheet Ril Gully
45.00) (2-6)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 Sandy Soil 3653.9 2631.04 840.15 182.78 -
7 3811.61 3288.99 208.26 - 2535 1268 343 NA
2 Sandy Loam 2923.2 2104.31 671.23 147.66 0 -
Soil 0
3 Loam Soil 731.71 462.90 168.36 36.16 64.29
Total 7308.8 5198.25 1679.74 366.60 64.29
27
4. Climate &Hydrological feature
Intensity of draught and flood in village and others metrological data gives the brides eye view for the watershed in term of
whether and physical parameters.
The watershed falls under the semi-arid region of tropical climate. The average annual precipitation is 650 mm spreading over
35 rainy days. Most of the rainfall (about 85 %) is received during July to September. The rainfall is of moderate to high intensity. The
area receives no or scanty rainfall in the winter season. The temperature variation ranges from as high as 440C in the month of May -
June to as low as1- 30C in December - January.
(a) Irrigation facilities
S.No. Type of the Source Nos. Irrigated area in Hac. Remark
1 2 3 4 5
1 M.I.tanks - - -
2 Open wells - - -
3 Bore Wells 568 1420
4 Canal irrigation - -
5 Natural spring head - - -
28
(b) Status of Water Table
S.No. Name of the farmer S.No. Source(open/ Date of Depth of water Source located Remar
bore recording table for ground level at(right/middle/valley ks
well) (in mts) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Shri Mukesh s/o Jagmer 1 bore well 25-2-11 17.50 valley
2 Shri Pradeep s/o Indarpal 1 bore well 27-2-11 21.00 ridge
3 Shri Syam Singhs/o Lalchand 1 bore well 27-1-11 20.50 middle
4 Shri Sahdevs/o Jaypal 1 bore well 16-1-11 19.40 middle
5 Shri Rakesh s/oShivsaran 1 bore well 17-2-11 19.60 middle
6 Shri Verendar s/o Vijaypal Kishanpal 1 bore well 28-2-11 22.00 ridge
(c) Quality of Drinking Water

One of the objectives of the watershed project is to insure at least drinking water even during time of drought
S.No. Source Location Date of No. of samples Specific remarks of stage of ground water reasons for
(Bore/well/OHS) collection of collected the lab report development over
etc sample (safe/semi critical/ exploitation
critical/over exploited)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Hand pump maxim in 25-2-11 1 Check by safe -
side Pradhan
side Pradhan
side Pradhan
4 Hand pump some on 16-1-11 1 Check by unsafe due to sugar
road Pradhan mill
5 Bore 0n Road 17-2-11 1 Check byPradhan safe -
29
(d) Availability of Drinking Water
S.No. Item Units Quantity Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day 662110
2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day 593580
3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 7412 hand pump
a) Functional Nos. 5830 hand pump
b) Need repairs Nos. 1250 hand pump
c)Defunct Nos. 332 hand pump
4 Shortfall if any Ltrs/day 68530
5 No. of families getting drinking water from out side the Micro Nos. NA
watershed area
6 Requirement of new drinking water sources (if any) Nos. 8 Overhead community tank
(e) Ground Water Structures to be repaired:
S.No. Type of structure No. available

No. to be Repaired No. to be rejuvenated No. with no Total
interventions
required
1 Indian mark hand pump and traditional 1062 332 188 1580
hand pumps
Total 1062 332 188 1580
30
5. Details of Existing Livelihoods
The information of the existing livelihood activities in the project area is essential to understand the scope of introducing how
livelihood as well as an estimate for no of family to be covered for income generating activities.
Pre-project
S.N. Name of activity No. of beneficiaries average income
per HH(Rs.)
SC ST Others Total Women
1 Cows Dairy 25 - 387 412 11 2850
Buffaloes 55 - 198 253 118 3850
Goat, Sheep 56 - 191 247 8 2400
2 Poultry 102 - - 102 15 2500
3 Piggery 22 - 22 12 2300
4 Others - - - - - -
31
PRA EXERSISE
&
SOCIAL MAPS
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
PROBLEM TYPOLOGY
OF
THE WATERSHED
42
Problem Identification and Prioritization:
Food sufficiency, economic growth and environmental security has identified as the major issues to be addressed in the
watershed area. The area has moderate to steep slope hence highly prone to soil erosion. Efficiency soil depth is unlimited and
spatially useful for good crop growth. Poor lively hood, poor farming system & poor livestock.
Problems identified and prioritized the transect walk and PRA exercise in all 13 villages have pooled and list of 10 (ten)
problems representing the whole watershed was prepared. Rank of the problem of all 13 villages was workout by the matrix ranking
procedure. Lack of irrigation water is the greatest problem experienced by the people followed by low productivity of field crops, lack
of fodder availability and lower production of livestock.
S.No. Problems Rank

1 Low production of Agriculture crops 7
2 Lack of irrigation water with poor water productivity 8
3 Lack of drinking water as well as for house hold uses 3
4 Non availability of fuel wood 6
5 Lack of inputs like quality seeds, fertilizers, pesticides etc. 2
6 Poor management and health care facilities for milch and other animals 5
7 Lack of fodder availability and lower productivity of animal 5
8 Lack of medical, educational and transportation facilities peoples 4
9 Deterioration in soil health and fertility (decrease of Soil Organic Matter status ) 7
10 Un /under employment for rural youth and out migration 6
43
STRENGTH, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITY AND THREAT (SWOT) ANALYSIS
A SWOT analysis of watershed is is a useful decision support tool presented as below:
STRENGTH (S) WEAKNESS (W)

1- Work culture is traditional activities 1- Poor water management
2- Close ethnic tier 2- Resource poor farmers
3- Road at the top as well as outlet of the watershed 3- Out migration of youth
4- Hard working man power 4- Low and erotic rain fall
5- Resource pool of crop genetic diversity 5- Fragile geography
6- Awareness of farmers about watershed management 6- Fragmented land holding
program 7- Heavy infestation of wild animals
7-Well established CPR maintaining and sharing system 8- Problem of fuel and fodder
8- Well maintained seasonal water bodies
9- Social outlook of the community towards
OPPORTUNITIES(O) THREATS (T)
1- Wide range of annual and perennial crops 1-Prone to adverse climate like drought and extreme
2- Scope of regular employment opportunity to check temperature
out migration 2- High market risk
3- Strengthening of existing irrigation system 3- Social conflicts owing to PRI & WSM policies and local
4- Conductive climate for rain fed crop diversification politics.
5- Good scope for agro forestry and dry land horticulture. 4- Weak coordination among line departments
6- Potential for collective active action and management of 5- Lack of expertise of implementing agencies in different
CPRs. aspect of WSM
44
1. Climate:
The watershed falls under the semi-arid region of tropical climate. The average annual precipitation is 650 mm spreading over
35 rainy days. Most of the rainfall (about 85 %) is received during July to September remaining 15 of rains occur during winter
season. The rainfall is of moderate to high intensity. The area receives no or scanty rainfall in the winter season. The temperature
variation ranges from as high as 440C in the month of May - June to as low as 1- 30C in December - January. Frost and fog are the
common phenomenon in the month of December and January.
2. Geo-morphology and Soils:

A. Geo-morphology
The IWMP-III Bagpat watershed is located North corner of the Bagpat district. The entire watershed is topographically divided into
three major landforms. Accordingly, the soils of watershed can be grouped into two major categories. Such as
i) Plain land
ii) Ravenous land
B. Soils
1. Fine textured alluvial soils
These soils are the most extensive soil group found in the Binauli IWMP-III Bagpat watershed. The middle portion of
watershed is relatively flat land with fine soil texture. These soils yellow are in colour and are inherently high in fertility status. These
yellow soils are calcareous and on drying develop numerous some cracks and fissures. Soil texture is silty clay loam particularly in
depressions and loam in the elevated portion. The soils of the lower horizon are invariably heavier than the surface, subsurface
indurate pan of hard soil or clay or mixtures of both locally called as chikni mitty soils are prevalent, which impede the downward
movement of water thereby creating problems of high runoff.
45
2. Coarse textured alluvial soils
These soils are lying mostly near the adjoining areas of Krashana River near the outlet and around the lower portion of river
down steam of watershed. These soils are coarser in texture and are relatively poor in fertility status. The soils are loamy sand in
texture. These soils also occupy significant area of the watershed.
2. Drainage
Due to prevalence of mild to steep slopes and presence of a number of drainage lines in the watershed, the drainage system is
adequate. The watershed forms part of Ganga basin.
3. Vegetation / Natural vegetation
Natural vegetation of the watershed is very poor. The forest vegetation is predominant with Vilayati Babul (Prosopis
juliflora) followed by Babul (Acacia nilotica). There are occasional occurrence of Neem plants (Azadirachta indica), Papdi
(Holopteila integrifolia), Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo), Karanj (Pongamia glabra) and Chonkra (Prosopis cineraria). There is no grass
land in the watershed. Grass patches are seen only on the bunds, road sides and other such places. The principal grasses are Anjan
grass, Munj, Kans and Gandher.
Forests
The watershed has vast tract of denuded boulder and rock wasteland. These wastelands do not have any tree vegetation. It
typically falls under “Northern tropical thorn forest” according to Champion and Seth classification of forest type of India.
Horticulture/Agro-forestry
No horticulture and Agro forestry practices were observed in the watershed.
Agro forestry
The agriculture fields of the village have some forest or horticultural plantation. At places, some isolated trees of Acacia
nilotica can be seen, whose frequency is less than one thirteen per running length of 100 m. The agro-forestry practices are highly
lacking in the watershed though it has good potential under existing dispositions and may play a vital role particularly with respect to
minimization of cropping risk, build up soil fertility and productivity, soil conservation, partly meeting out the fire wood demand of
rural community and moreover, optimizing the economical return from system as a whole under typical semi arid climate in the
46
watershed. The other agro-forestry systems like agri-silvi, silvi-pastoral, bund and boundary plantations also have good potential to
cater the fire wood and fodder demands of the rural community in the watershed. The existing area under agro-forestry is almost
negligible. Prosopis juliflora may be planted as block or sole plantation specifically on marginal and degraded lands in the watershed.
The agro-forestry interventions comprising of ber, bail, aomla, guava, popular etc may be applied for benefit of the farmers under rain-
fed to irrigated production systems on leveled to sloping and marginal agricultural using proper planting techniques and termite
control measures. The multipurpose trees may also help in supplementing fire wood and fodder demands of the rural community in the
watershed and may be planted as hedge rows on rain-fed, marginal and degraded lands.
Horticulture:
There is no back yard horticulture or commercial horticultural plantation in the villages except few scattered mango and guava
fruit plants The subtropical fruits and vegetables have very good potential in the watershed. The fruit trees h limited in number like
mango, guava, papaya, lemon, lime, ber, aonla well ,mango as vegetables like cucurbits, okra, radish, tomato, cauliflower, cabbage,
garlic, onion, brinjal, chilly but they are found surviving well in the watershed villages. Organized orchards, commercial vegetable
cultivation, horti-agri and other systems of agro-forestry etc are lacking but have good potential in the watershed.
.
4. Agriculture, horticulture and agro–forestry
The agriculture land use constitutes about 57% of the total watershed area. Both rain-fed and irrigated agriculture are practiced
in the watershed. Mono cropping is dominant in the rain fed production system while double cropping is limited to the irrigated lands,
which constitutes about 30% of the total area under agriculture. Rain-fed agriculture is mostly mono cropping with invariably low
productivity. These areas constitute about 70% of total agriculture area. The food and livelihood security is primarily driven by the
natural weather factors of rain and its distribution specifically across the cropping season. Only about 37% area under agriculture is
cropped during kharif season in the watershed. Among various crops bajra, urd, shares maximum area (15%), followed by sesame
(10%), jowar (5%) and pulses i.e. black gram and green gram (2%). Farmers use high yielding varieties of bajra (JK, Pioneer, Aarti,
Boss, PAC 9444, Mahyco Bajra) and sesame (Nitya) which are mostly truthfully lebelled seed from private seed companies. The
productivity of kharif crops is low and fluctuates depending upon rainfall pattern, use of fertilizer and incidence of diseases and insect
47
pests. Low yielding local varieties of jowar are grown without fertilization for grain and fodder production. The local jowar varieties
are one of the various constraints in fodder production in the watershed. The green fodder production through various sources like
crops, grasses and limited forest trees is clearly inadequate for maintaining proper health of existing animals. Also no use of manure
and fertilizer in sesame, no seed treatment with Rhizobium culture in pulses are the other salient production constraints in the
watershed. Watershed has good scope for lowland and semi deep water rice cultivation in seasonally submerged area, which remains
unutilized during kharif season. Almost in all villages of the watershed, no compost pits exists and fresh to semi decomposed farm
yard manure is applied directly to the agriculture fields. The green manures like dhaincha, sun-hemp, neel have good potential in the
watershed however the practice of green manure is meager and unpopular in the watershed, in spite of the fact that organic matter
status as well as fertility of the agricultural soils are poor to fairly good. The cultivated fallow lands dominate in the watershed which
contributes to accelerated soil erosion as well as runoff yields in the watershed.
Various agricultural land uses in the watershed are extended to diversified land capabilities starting from marginal to good
class II lands. The watershed distinctly has three types of lands i.e. leveled, sloping and degraded and undulating. The agriculture is
practiced on all these soil types though the productivity considerably varies. The total area under agriculture in the watershed is about
7308.88 ha out of which 3650.ha is irrigated while 4162.00 ha are under rain-fed agriculture. The water (both irrigated and drinking)
is most scarce natural resource in the watershed. The operation of tube wells for irrigation of agricultural crops frequently leads to the
drinking water problem to the farmers of watershed forcing them to carry drinking water from out side the watershed area. The
agricultural field bunds are common in the watershed, however, they frequently breach on heavy rains adversely affecting the in situ
percolation of rain water in the soils.
The agriculture soils in the watershed have diversified texture i.e. loam sand, silty clay loam and sandy which are located in
patches through out the watershed. The heavy soils are almost kept fallow during rainy season. The agricultural soils also have hard
soil at variable depths. The irrigation water is conveyed in earthen channels and surface irrigation methods following mainly border
method or flood method of irrigation by the farmers in the watershed. These factors substantially reduce the water use efficiency of
limited available and valuable irrigation water in the watershed. The quality of irrigation water needs to be tested for assessing fitness
of the quality for irrigation and other purposes.
48
Among Rabi crops, mustard occupies the largest area under agriculture (70 to 80%) followed by the wheat (10%) and pulses
like gram and lentil (5%). Farmers are using high yielding varieties of rabi crops like Karan, Krishna, Kranti, Sharda, Moti, Chambal,
Nath, Sona, Raj Luxmi, Pioneer, T-59, Rohini, AK-47 in mustard and UP 343, UP 2329, UP 2338, HD 2009 and even very old
varieties like Lok-1 in wheat crop. Beside this, desi varieties of gram and lentil are also used by the farmers. Imbalanced fertilizer use
in the rabi crops both under rain-fed and irrigated areas, absence of S containing fertilizers and inadequate pest control measures with
respect to aphid and white blister in mustard and pod borer in gram are some of the reason of low productivity of these crops.
The agricultural productivity is primarily driven by the amount and distribution of rain water specifically during two cropping
seasons i.e. rabi and kharif. Productivity of kharif crops is also affected by the late onset or early withdrawal of monsoon as well as
intermittent droughts of variable duration and intensity. The farmers also do not have suitable cropping systems to deal aberrant
weather. Weeds impose considerable constraint in productivity of both kharif and rabi crops under irrigated as well as rain-fed
production system. Farmers undertake normally one manual weeding in mustard and other valuable crops however, practice is energy
and time consuming. Use of weedicide is rare in the watershed.
The mixed cropping is in practice in limited area with kharif crops like bajra +urd, jowar +urd, but it is not only irrational but
also unscientific and beset with low productivity. Subsequent Rabi crops in general and mustard crop in particular are raised on
residual soil moisture under rain-fed production system during post monsoon season. Imbalanced use of fertilizers is common in not
only rabi and kharif crops but also in rain-fed and irrigated production system. The recommended deep plowing for enhanced in situ
residual soil moisture conservation and higher production is also not followed in the watershed. The shallow plowing tractor drawn
tillage implements are available with the farmers in the watershed but deep plowing implements yet need to be introduced.
The soil fertility/health restoration practices like green manuring, crop rotations and intercropping specifically with legumes,
use of FYM/ compost, Vermicompost, bio fertilizers, soil and water conservation measures, use of brought up or in situ mulches are
widely lacking in the watershed. The soil and water conservation measures are limited to mechanical/ earthen measures created by the
state Govt. agencies. Conservation agronomical measures like seeding and plowing across the slope, weed mulching, agro-forestry,
vegetative barriers etc also completely lack in the watershed.
49
The majority of farmers of the watershed are facing considerable problem of fire wood, fodder due to meager or almost
negligible forest area, lack of traditional agro-forestry practices and pastures. Cow dung, Stover of mustard, sesame and dhaincha and
scattered trees of Prosopis juliflora are main sources of fire wood specifically to small, marginal and landless farmers in the
watershed. The organized orchards as well as forest area are widely lacking in the watershed. The watershed has a good potential of
fruit and forest tree species like ber, bail, aonla, papaya, guava, citrus species, lasoda, karonda, ramda, , shisam, , tamarind, neem,
popular, Acacia, Palash, Prosopis juliflora as agro-forestry systems both under rain-fed and irrigated production systems on leveled to
sloping agriculture lands as well as on degraded lands provided proper planting techniques involving appropriate termite control
measures are used. The multipurpose trees have also very good potential for supplementing fuel and fodder demands in the watershed
and may be included in appropriate land use options. Sole forestry plantation of Prosopis juliflora on degraded and marginal lands also
have good potential in the watershed to cater the need of firewood demand. The main source of green fodder for animals is limited to
jowar, berseem and grasses in the watershed. Though the vegetables have good potential in the watershed however, their cultivation is
limited mostly to kitchen gardens. Almost all tropical/ sub tropical vegetable may be successfully grown in the watershed. The
vegetables grown in the watershed are cucurbits, okra, radish, tomato, cauliflower, cabbage, garlic, onion, brinjal and chilly etc.
Rehabilitation of waste lands with appropriate drought hardy species like Prosopis juliflora, introduction of suitable multi-
purpose trees, promoting agro-forestry on agricultural lands with appropriate fruit and forest species, suitable vegetative barriers on
sloping lands can of high future value in meeting out not only fire wood and fodder demands in the watershed but also for soil and
water conservation, rehabilitation of wasteland and substantial income generation for socio-economic upliftment of farmers in the
watershed.
Indigenous technological knowledge (ITK)
The agriculture is an old traditional practice of farmers in the watershed who have improved themselves with passage of the
time according to their domestic need and technological reforms in the nearby areas. The villagers have their traditional village ponds,
practice of field bunding which typically constitute agriculture related Indigenous technological knowledge in the watershed. The
mustard being a cash/ fire wood crop of the watershed is being cultivated in self designed manner by the farmers. However, limited
fertilizer application specifically the DAP came in to practice since about 20 years.
50
Natural resource base
Out of total area 7308.88.00 ha area of IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed, an area of 5279.00 ha (72.24 %) is under rain fed
agriculture and 261827.00 ha (25.00%) under waste land, (1451.00 ha is untreatable area), seasonal water bodies occupying about
1094.73 ha (14.98%) and village land and road etc. is 181.96 Ha (2.49 %). Main sources of irrigation are the seasonal water bodies for
pre sowing irrigation only. Transact of the watershed showed typical land use profile consisting of plain agricultural land and ravinous
lower ridge Importance of development institutions
Means of communication
IWMP-III Bagpat watershed can approach either from all villages (5-6 km) or all villages are also interconnected by village
Pucca road. One side of the watershed (Valley) is having Block Baraut, Boundary.
51
5. Dependency on forest for fuel wood and fodder:
a) Fuel wood
Villagers in the village do not use LPG to meet their cooking energy requirements. The main source of fuel is from cow dung
cake, woody stem of Arhar and Mustard crop. About 90 percent of the domestic energy requirement is met from the agro-byproduct
and cow dung cake. Rest is met out from the forest outside the village and watershed boundary. Most preferred fuel wood is Nilotica
aciatica. Fuel wood is obtained from the forest standing along the river Krishna situated outside the watershed boundary.
b) Fodder:
Villagers do not have any significant dependency on forest based fodder as these resources are not available in the project area.
Availability of food grain, fodder, fuel and employment is as follows:
Item
S.No. Availability in a year
(No. of days)
1 2 3
1 Food grains (Wheat, Rice and pulses) 280
2 Work (no. of days/annum) 210
3 Green Fodder (Abundant/Sufficient/Source) 115
4 Dry Fodder (Abundant/Sufficient/Source) 195
5 Fuel (Abundant/Sufficient/Source) 185
52
6. Proposed Land Use
Watershed management plan for IWMP-III Bagpat watershed is proposed with specific objectives of food efficiency and
income and employment generation with environmental security. In plan preparation due importance is given to topology, land
suitability, irrigation potentiality, prevailing forming systems, micro-farming situation, farmers preferences and priorities along with
economic and environmental securities, crop and tree selection and area distribution is done as per farmers priorities revealed through
PRA exercise. Technological options are blended with the indigenous knowledge based on the latest available research/experimental
findings for this region. Due attention is given to resource of the farmers and adjustments has made in capital intensive/high resource
demanding technological outputs while making them adoptable to the resource poor farmers. Emphasis is given on maximum use of
Farmyard Manure (FYM) and green manuring. The proposed land use plan of watershed is given as below:
Present and Proposed land use plan of the selected watershed:
S.No. Land use Present (ha) Proposed(ha)

1 Agriculture
a Rain fed 4625.00 4162.00
(i) Crop 3650.00 3727.76
(ii)Agro-forestry 90.26 433.28
b Irrigated (Tub well) 630.81 1093.52
(i)Assured - -
(ii)Partial (private resource) 271.74 429.11
2 Wasteland 1271.26 1105.00
(i)Afforestation - 343.00
(ii)Pasture 25.08 25.08
(iii)Untreatable 373.00 373.00
3 Village land 384.54 384.54
Total 7308.88 7308.88
53
WATER RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AND SOIL CONSERVATION
MEASURES
Status of Present Water Resources Utilization: There is no natural water body in the selected area which may use for
irrigation. Present assured/Partial irrigation is done by private tube wells.
Proposed Plan for Irrigation of Water Resources: Sprinkler sets for irrigation from private tube well are distributed by Agriculture
Department to Tube well holders on the basis of & Irrigation group. Effort will made to help the tube well holders of selected area to
form group and to get sprinkler sets. Therefore, more area will be irrigated by the available irrigation water.
New Water Harvesting Structures: In the 330.00 ha area new and renovation of existing watershed harvesting structure / Gully Plug
/ Earthen C.D. will be constructed for water harvesting.
Ground Water Recharge: In order to augment the flow in the drainage line, it is necessary to undertake moisture and water recharge
measure in the watershed area. For the purpose of ground water recharge 42 Nos of recharge filters and 70 of recharge pits are
planned in the selected area. Detail is given in detail estimate enclose
Crop Production: In the light of the land capability classification of the watershed and need of the farmers, the reallocation of
watershed area rainfed and irrigated lands has been done for improving productivity, income generation and maintaining ecological
balance. The production crop management plan has the following salient features:
Sustainable and Eco-friendly Farming System: This farming System will be achieved in the following manner:
a) Recycling of crop and farm residues in the Integrate plant Nutrients System (IPNS)
b) Provision of legumes incorporation in the existing cropping system.
c) Rapid composting; using crop residue, domestic & farm waste and cattle dung
d) Mulching and Crop Residue Management: Sources of mulch material includes weeds, pruning from agro-foresting trees
and in situ grown legumes and green manure crops. The concept of live mulching is based on the principle of mixed cropping
whereby a fast growing legumes is established before or simultaneously along with a widely spaced seasonal grain crops such
54
maize is incorporated into the soil at an appropriate stage to act as a mulch. Application of organic mulch material 4-5 t / ha is
recommended.
e) Green Manuring: To improve the organic matter and physical condition of the soils , green manuring crops like Dhaincha
and sun hemp which supply 20-30 t / ha of green mutter and 85-125 kg/ha of Nitrogen shall be raised and incorporated in to the
soil. In 1966, ha area green manuring is planned.
f) Seed Treatment with Bio fertilizers Culture: The seed of leguminous crop like black gram, lentil, gram, arhar, pea, etc.
should be treated with Rhyzobium and PSB culture before sowing. While non legume will be treated with other suitable bio
fertilizers.
g) Tillage operation: It is advisable to carry out tillage operation like ploughing followed by planking just after the harvest of
Kharif crops. This will be helpful in conserving moisture for sowing and germination of Rabi crop in addition, coverage of soil
surface with milch material is also recommended to ensure the soil moisture.
h) Introduction of Improved Seeds/Varieties: Short duration and high yielding varieties suitable for this region have been
proposed in long duration verities. Demonstrations of High Yielding Varieties (HYVs) of different crops in 257.32.00 ha is
planned in the watershed however for self sufficiency in seed requirement farmers of the watershed will be involved to produce
required quantity of seed of the recommended crop varieties.
i) Sowing Methods: Agronomical practices like contour cultivation, FIRB, seed drilling, strip or inter-cropping, optimum time of
sowing , optimum plant population by keeping proper distance through line sowing and placement of fertilizer below the seed
will help in enhancing the crop yields without involving monetary inputs.
j) Control of Insects Pest and Diseases: Pod borer in gram is the major insect in the watershed area leading to loss in crop
productivity. Similarly white blister is also a strategies common disease in the mustard crop pests and diseases will also be
demonstrated in the watershed the management of these insects, for benefit of the growers.
k) Dry Land Horticulture: In the selected area 325.0 ha land is planned for horticulture and agro horticulture. Species like aonla,
guava, ber, bel, lemon will be planted at suitable spacing in the watershed.
55
SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT
Sustainability and Environmental Security:
In the proposed watershed management plan of IWMP-III Bagpat proper blending of bio engineering measures will be
applied. The proposed land use plan will improve the land utilization index and crop diversification index significantly as compared to
existing one. It will help in maintaining ecosystem integrity on sustained basis.
Economic Analysis:
Economic analysis of the project is carried out by taking direct benefits and costs, considering 30 year project life at 10%
discount rate. For the purpose of economic analysis, whole watershed development plan is divided into four sectors namely
agriculture (rainfed and irrigated), pure horticulture, agro-horticulture and silvi pastoral (Silvi-Pastoral + sericulture). Net present
value (NPV), Benefit:Cost Ratio (BCR), Payback Period (PBR) and internal rate of return (IRR) criteria is employed to judge the
economic efficiency of each enterprise, sector and project as a whole.
Labour Requirement:
Labour requirement was found to be the maximum during Oct.–Nov, when the harvesting of kharif and sowing of rabi crops
are done simultaneously. The crucial periods are March/April coinciding harvesting and threshing of Rabi crops and July/August when
sowing of kharif crops take place. Other income generating enterprises having potential during the remaining period can be planned.
Crop Calendar:
The present crop calendar in the watershed comprise of fallow-mustard, arhar-wheat, bajra-wheat, bajra-mustard, sesame-wheat,
sesame-mustard, jowar-wheat, jowar-mustard, black gram-wheat, black gram-mustard, green gram-wheat, green gram-mustard,
fallow-berseem, etc. Fallow-mustard is the most prevailing crop rotations on the agricultural lands both in rain-fed and irrigated
conditions in the watershed. Organized vegetable cultivation and medicinal and aromatic crops in fruit plantation and traditional agro-
forestry systems are lacking widely in the watershed. The limited vegetable cultivation in the watershed is confined either to kitchen
gardens or to the irrigated conditions in a scattered manner on extremely small area with view to meet out the domestic demand for
vegetables. The cultivation of cash crops other than the mustard also lacks in the watershed.
56
Historical timeline
An historical timeline is the chronological record of important events in the history of the village which is useful in understanding its
background in the context of IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed. Historical timeline depicting important events in respect of different
villages of the watershed was prepared through PRA. Historical timeline for village Teekri is given in following Table .
Historical time line for village Teekari
S.N0. Activities Year
1 Established 1720
2 Opening up Primary school 1945
3 Kacha road 1955

4 Introduction of Tractor 1970
5 Bituminous road 1970
6 First Tube well 1980
7 First Motorcycle 1980
8 Electricity in the village 1980
9 Temple renovation 1980
10 TV and DVD player 1988
11 Establishment of Gobar gas plant 1990
12 Introduction of thresher 1990
13 Over head water tank 2004
14 Planning for watershed project 2010
57
SOIL AND LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
A. Soil morphology
The IWMP-III Bagpat watershed is located south west corner of the Bagpat district. The entire watershed is topographically divided
into three major landforms. Accordingly, the soils of watershed have been grouped in three major categories.
i) Plain land
ii) Ravinous land
Soil profile- A representative soil profile (Dominant soil-Table 8)
1-1.5 m (medium texture soil- black in colour)
5-6 m
(Locally called “Potni soil”-Clay mixed with sandy)
Parent material/Regolith
58
B. Morphology of a typical soil profile of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed (dominant soil)
Horizon Depth (cm) Morphology
yellow in color, clay content 28%, with free CaCO3, sticky when moist, hard when dry, high elasticity,
A 0-150 fissures and cracks, occasional occurrence of free calcium carbonate granules pH 8.3-8.7
Whitish-yellow in colour, high effervescence with dilute HCl, very fine mixed with free CaCO3 and
B 150-600 granules, very hard when dry, compact & indurate hard pan, restricting development of root and
downward water transmission (locally called as Potni soil)
C > 600 Red and white sandstone, Regolith (Parent material)
C. Soil characteristics and fertility status

Soil characteristics pertaining to soil fertility of various classes occurring around different villages are given in following Table
Soil properties LCC II LCC IV LCC VII/VIII
Sand (%) 47.04 75.04 73.04
Silt (%) 24.6 18.6 20.3
Clay (%) 28.36 6.36 6.66
Texture Sandy clay loam Loamy sand Loamy sand
pH (1: 2) 8.41 8.67 6.85
EC (dS m-1) 0.47 0.12 0.16
Organic carbon (%) 0.37 0.12 0.19
Available N (kg ha-1) 316 173 224
Available P (kg ha-1) 29 15 5-8
Available K (kg ha-1) 189 325 230
*Values correspond to soil fraction < 2mm
59
Land Capability Classification (LCC)
Land capability classification was done to classify the soils in different groups based upon the limitations and to emphasize the
hazards prevailing in the watershed under different kinds of soils. Initially reconnaissance survey was carried out for entire watershed
in order to find out the different topo-sequences, landforms, and soil depth and erosion hazards. This was followed by the detailed
investigation of selected landforms to bring out the LCC classes of the IWMP-I BBagpat Watershed. Three classes of land capability
namely II, IV, and VII were demarcated in the watershed. The areas under different classes are sown in table.
Area under different land capability class under IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed
S.No. Land Capability Class Area (ha)
1 II 4348.16
2 IV 1315.56
3 VII 1168.90
4 VIII 476.26
Total 7308.88
Land capability class II (Yellow)
This group is one of the most extensive LCC class of the IWMP-III Bagpat watershed. This group of soil is occupying around
2855.40 ha of the watershed area. The soils are clay loam or silty clay loam in texture. The land under this class is nearly level to mild
sloping area of watershed is seasonally waterlogged comes under this LCC class, primarily found near the earthen check. These areas
are subject to water logging in most part of the year. The lands are almost flat, silty clay or clay loam in texture, deep and very mild
slopping. These lands have no major limitations other than occasional water logging. During rabi season, the water is drained out and
60
cultivation is carried out. These lands potentially very productive but due to water logging during the rainy season, it could not be
brought out under cultivation during the kharif season. The mapping unit for this class is given as under:
Land capability class IIe = scl-d5/B-e1
Land capability class IV (Blue)
A considerable area of watershed i.e. 1315.56 ha is under class IV. This class is found in lower portion i.e. near the outlet of
watershed. The soils are coarser in texture (loamy sand/sand), deep, susceptible to erosion hazard and undulating in topography. Rill
and initiation of gully can be seen near the outlet of the watershed. Where soils are coarser in texture and shallow in depth, is also
coming under this class. The mapping unit for this class is as follows:
Land capability class IVe = ls-d5/C-e3, IVes = ls-d3/D-e3
Land capability class VII/VIII (Brown/Purple)
These lands are occupying an area of 761.10 ha of the watershed. This class of land is mostly found in waste land are of
watershed. The soils are very shallow underlying hard soil, steep slope (>30%) and coarser in texture. Mostly hard soils are found
under this class. Class VII and VIII are intermixed in top of the foot ridge of watershed. Mostly class VIII (476.26 ha) lands are
located on sloppy plain area, where soil depth is almost negligible. Soils with admixture of gravels fragments are found in these
classes of lands. The mapping unit for this class of land is as follows:
Land capability class VIIe = gls-d1/H/I-e4
Conclusions
The land capability classification of IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed provides reasonable good information with regard to
capability of soil that could be used for agriculture, agri-horticulture, and silviculture and pasture development. The majority of land
form is coming under class II, which give an insight of good agriculture production potential of this watershed. The productivity of
these lands could be further enhanced by adoption of simple soil & water conservation measures like mild leveling, bunding, diversion
drain and in-situ moisture conservation practices. The reasonable area is under class VII indicating greater potential of this watershed
for forestry and pasture development. The major physical limitations in case of agriculture soils are the sub soil hardness, low water
infiltrability and slope. The most pronounced limitation of soil depth was noticed followed by severe erosion hazard and coarse soil
texture. A small portion of watershed is under seasonally waterlogged. The soils under waterlogged area could be used for some other
beneficial farming activities during the kharif season also.
61
PLANNING PROCESS
62
Ground water recharge:
In order to augment the
flow in the drainage line, it is
necessary to undertake
moisture conservation and
water recharge measure in the
watershed area. For the purpose
of ground water recharge, the
area of the upper side of some
villages is recommended for
ground water recharge. For
ground water recharge and
moisture conservation, contour
staggered trenches (2m in
length with cross section of
0.3 X 0.3 m and having
intensity of 150 trenches / ha)
may be constructed covering
an area 50 ha and 10 numbers
of recharge filter are proposed
in the watershed. Details of the
recharge filter are given in Fig.
4
Fig. 4
63
Detailed estimate of recharge filter
Cost of Recharge filter with connecting pipe to the defunct well or bore well at IWMP-IIII Bagpat watershed
.
EST MATE OF PERCOLATION TANK
PERTICULAR quantity
S.No Item of 'W ork No. L B H/D
1 E/w in foundation I 2.35 2.35 1.5 8.28m
2 C:C.Work (I :3:6) in foundation Long wall 2 2.35 0.5 1.5 0.352
C:C.Work (I :3:6) in foundation Short ..all 2 1.35 0.5 0.15 0.203 0.555cMT
3 B/w 1:4 in wall Long \\all 2 2.2 0.35 2.5 3.85
B/w 1:4 in wall Short wall 2 1.5 0.35 2.5 2.625 6.475
4 Plaster (1:4) outside 4 2.35 2.5 23.5
Plaster (1:4) inside 4 1.5 2.5 15 38.50sqm
5 100 mm. dia PYC pipe for filter pit I 8 0 0 8.00m
6 Barring for recharge shaft I 13.00m 0 0 13.00 m
7 Coarse Sand in Shaft I 3.14x.0.125x0.1254x4.30 0.21
8 B/Ballast 40 mm gauge I 3.14x.0.125x0.1254x4.30 0.21
9 Stone Grit 12-20 mm. gauge I 3.14x.0.125x0.1254x4.30 0.21
10 Coarse sand for pits I 1.50 x 1.50 x 0.50= 1.13
MATERAIL REQUIRED IN WORK
S.No. Work qty Bricks Cement StoneGrite PVCPipe Sand

1 CC work 1 :3:6 0.555 189 2.53 0 0 0.255
2 B/w 1:4 6.4 75 3000 12.95 0 0 I. 748
3 Plaster 38.5 0 4.24 0 0 5.77
4 Shaft Material 13.00m 0 0 0.21 0 0.21
filling and filler 0 0 0 8 1.31
Total 3189 20 0.21 8 7.545
Rate 3200 290 1500 250 1500

Amount 10405 5800 315 2000 11317.5
Total 29837
Labour charge cost of material 40% 11935
Carriage Charges cost of material 10% 2984
44756
Say 44800 per unit
64
Drawing of Bathroom& Cloth Changing Room for Woman
3.43 m
2.42 m
0.10 m 0.23
2.70
0.30
D.P.C.
0.45 2.5 cm
0.15
1.96 m 0.10 0.10
2.97 m 0.37
DESCRIPTION
1. Brick work - 1:4
2. Door size - 0.80 m x 1.80 m
3. D.P.C. –2.5 cm- 1:2:4.
4. C.C.W. – 1:4:8.
5. R.C.C. of roof - 1:2:4.
6. Window size - 0.75 m x 0.60 m.
7. Plastering work – 1:4.
8. Lintel – 1:2:4. R.C.C.
65
Detail estimate of proposed woman cloth changing and bath room:
S.N. Description of work No. Length Width Height/Depth Quantity
(M) (M) (M)
1 Earth work in digging 2 3.30 0.60 0.80 3.168
2 1.33 0.60 0.80 1.276
1 1.33 0.30 0.80 0.319
Total 4.763 cum
2 C.C.W. 1:4:8 in foundation 2 3.11 0.37 0.10 0.230
2 1.36 0.37 0.10 0.100
1 1.36 0.15 0.10 0.020
Total 0.350 cum
3 Brick work 1:6 in foundation up to plinth 2 3.11 0.37 0.15 0.345
2 1.36 0.37 0.15 0.150
1 1.36 0.11 0.15 0.022
2 2.97 0.23 0.75 1.024
2 1.50 0.23 0.75 0.517
1 1.50 0.11 0.75 0.123
Super Structure 2 2.97 0.23 2.70 3.688
2 1.50 0.23 2.70 1.863
1 1.50 0.11 2.70 0.445
Total 8.177 cum
4 D.P.C. 1:2:4 2 2.97 0.23 0.025 0.034
2 1.50 0.23 0.025 0.017
1 1.50 0.11 0.025 0.004
Total 0.005 cum
5 Lintel 1:2:4 for door 2 1.00 0.23 0.10 0.046
R.C.C. for window 2 0.75 0.23 0.10 0.034
Total 0.080 cum
6 Deduction from Brick work
door 1 0.80 0.23 1.80 0.331
window 2 0.80 0.23 0.60 0.220
Total 0.882 cum
Net brick masonary work 8.177 - 0.882 7.295 cum
7 Plastering 1:4 2 3.11 - 3.00 18.66
2 1.96 - 3.00 11.76
4 1.20 - 2.70 12.96
4 1.50 - 2.70 16.20
2 1.20 1.50 - 3.60
Total 63.18
Deduction for doors 1 0.80 - 1.80 1.44 sq.m
66
Net plastering work 63.18 – 2.88 60.30 sq.m
8 Flooring C.C.W. 1:4:8 2 1.50 1.20 0.075 0.270 cum
C.C.W. 1:2:4 2 1.50 1.20 0.025 0.090 cum
9 white washing 2 3.11 - 3.00 18.66

2 1.96 - 3.00 11.76
4 1.20 - 2.70 12.96
4 1.50 - 2.70 16.20
2 1.20 1.50 - 3.60
Total 63.18 sq.m
Deduction for doors 1 0.80 - 1.80 1.44 sq.m
Net white washing 63.18 - 2.88 60.30 sq.m
10 Roof R.C.C. 1:2:4 1 3.57 1.96 0.10 0.699 cum
Consumption of materials;
S. Particulars Quantity Cement Coarse sand Brick G.S.B M.S. Bar 8 10-20 m.m. Door No. Lime (kg.)
N. (Bags) (cum) (Nos) (m3) mm Grit
1 C.C.W. 1:4:8 0.620 cum 2.10 0.279 - 0.576 - - - -

2 C.C.W. 1:2:4 0.095 cum 0.57 0.039 - - - 0.080 - -
3 R.C.C. 1:2:4 0.779 cum 4.75 0.327 - - 0.0079/61.15 0.662 - -
kg
4 Brick work 1:4 7.295 cum 13.13 1.969 3356 - - - - -
5 Plastering 1:4 60.300 m2 6.63 0.904 - - - - - -
6 White washing 60.300 m2 - - - - - - - 6.00
7 Doors 2 Nos - - - - - 0.742 2 -

Total 27.18 3.868 3356 0.576 0.0079/61.15 0.742 2 Nos. 6.00
kg
Say 27 3.870 3360 0.576 0.0079/61.15 0.742 2 Nos. 6.00
kg
67
Labour rate
S.No. Particulars Quantity Rate Amount
1. Earth Work 4.76 cum 33.33/cum 158.65
2. C.C.W. 1:4:8 0.620 cum 492.00/cum 305.04
3. C.C.W. 1:2:4 0.095 cum 492.00/cum 46.74
4. R.C.C.1:2:4 0.779 cum 560.00/cum 436.24
5. Brick work 7.295 cum 370.00/cum 2699.15
6. Plastering 60.300 m2 40.00/m2 2412.00
7. White washing 60.300 m2 2.70/m2 162.81
8. Curing 7.295 cum 25.00/cum 182.37
9. Chowkidar 6 Man days 100.00/Man day 600.00
Total Rs. 7,014.66
Cost of materials
S.No. Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs) Amount
1. Cement 27 bags 290/bag 7830
2. Coarse sand 3.87 cum 1500/cum 5805
3. Bricks 3360 Nos. 3200/thousand 10752
4. M.S. Bar 8 mm Ø 61.15 Kg. 400/qtl 2446
5. G.S.B 25-40 m 0.576 cum 855/cum 492.48
6. G.S. Grit 10-20 mm 0.742 cum 1250/cum 927.50
7. Doors with frame 2 Nos. 3850.00 each 7700.00
8. White lime 6 Kg. 8.00/kg 48.00
Total Rs. 35,952
Labour charges
Total Cost
1. Cost of materials 35952
2. Labour charges 7,014.66
Total Rs. 42968
Say Rs. 43000 only
68
DRAWING OF RECHARGE PITS
DESCRIPTION.
A – 0.10 x 0.20 Grit.
B – Coarse Sand.
C - 0.10 x 0.20 Grit.
D – 025 x 0.50 Grit.
E – Cut Stone / Random Rubble.
F – Brick wall 0.11 m x 0.25 m Width channel
Note: All dimensions are in meter
69
Detail estimate of recharge pit & channel of length 1.50 m
S.No. Description of Work No. L B D/H Quantity

1. Earth work in cutting 1 3.14 x 0.75 x 0.75 - 1.50 2.64 cum
2. Laying of Brick blast 1 3.14 x 0.75 x 0.75 - 0.60 1.059 cum
3 Laying G.S.B. 25-50 mm 1 3.14 x 0.75 x 0.75 - 0.45 0.794 cum
4. Laying of G.S.Grit 10-20 mm 1 3.14 x 0.75 x 0.75 - 0.15 0.264 cum

5. Laying of G.S.B. 25-50 mm 1 3.14 x 0.75 x 0.75 - 0.15 0.264 cum
6. Earth work 1 1.50 0.50 0.40 0.30 cum
7. Brick work 1:4 1 1.50 0.47 0.11 0.077 cum
10. Brick work 1:4 1x2 1.50 0.11 0.15 0.049 cum
Total of (9.) + (10.) Brick work 1:4. 0.126 cum
11. Plastering 1:4 1x2 1.50 0.56 - 1.680 m2
Abstract of measurement
1. Earth work 2.64 + 0.30 2.94 cum

2. Laying of Brick ballast 1.059 cum
3. Laying of G.S.B. 25-50 mm 0.794 + 0.264 1.058 cum
4. Laying of G.S.Grit 10-20 mm 0.264 cum
5. Laying of coarse sand 0.264 + 0.070 0.334 cum
6. Brick work 11cm 1:4 0.126 cum
7. Plastering 1:4 1.680 m2
70
Consumption of material
S.No. Description of work Quantity Cement Brick (nos) Khanda G.S.B. 25- G.S.Grit Coarse
(bag) (cum) 50 mm 10-20 mm Sand
(cum) (cum)
1. Laying of Brick Blast 1.059 cum - - 1.059 - - -
2. Laying of G.S.B. 1.058 cum - - - 1.058 - -
3. Laying of G.S.Grit 0.264 cum - - - - 0.264 -
4. Brick work 1:4 0.126 cum 0.17 60 - - - 0.030
5. Plastering 1:4 1.680 m2 0.18 - - - - 0.025
Total 0.35 60 1.059 1.058 0.264 0.389
Cost of materials
1. Bricks Blast 1.059 cum 1025/cum 1085.47
2. Cement 0.35 Bags 290/Bag 102.00
3. Brick 60 nos 3200/Thousand 192.00
4. Coarse Sand 0.389 cum 1500/cum 583.00
5. G.S.B. 25-50 mm 1.058 cum 855/cum 904.59
6. G.S.Grit 0.264 cum 1500/cum 396
Total Rs. 3262
Labour charges
1. Earth work 2.94 cum 36.66/cum 107.78
2. Brick blast 1.059 cum 33.33/cum 35.29
3. G.S.B. laying 1.058 cum 33.33/cum 35.26
4. G.S.Grit laying 0.264 cum 33.33/cum 8.79
5. Brick work 1:4 0.126 cum 370.00/cum 46.62
6. Plastering 1:4 1.680 m2 40.00/m2 67.20
7. Curing 0.126 cum 25.00/cum 3.15
Total Rs. 315.22
71
Total Expenditure
1. Cost of materials 3262.00
2. Labour Charges 315.22
Total Rs. 3577.20
Say Rs. 3580.00
Detail estimate of recharge tank
S.No. Description of Work No. L. B. D./H. Quantity

1. Earth Work 1 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.24 cum
2. Brick Work 1 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.029
2 0.52 0.11 0.30 0.034
2 0.30 0.11 0.30 0.019
Total 0.082 cum
3. Plastering 4 0.30 - 0.30 0.360
2 0.52 - 0.11 0.114
2 0.30 - 0.11 0.066
1 0.30 0.30 - 0.090
Total 0.630 m2
4. Steel Filter 4” Ø 1 1 nos.
5. P.V.C. Pipe 110 mm Ø 1 1.00 - - 1.00 m
Consumption of materials
S.No. Description of Work Quantity Cement Coarse Sand Brick P.V.C. Pipe Steel Filter
(bags) (cum) (nos.) 110 mm Ø
1. Brick Work 1:4 0.082 cum 0.11 0.019 39 - -
2. Steel Filter 4” 1 nos. - - - - 1 nos.
3. P.V.C. Pipe 110 mm Ø 1.0 m - - - 1.00 m -
4. Plastering 0.63 m2 0.06 0.009 - - -
Total 0.17 0.055 39 1.00 m 1 nos.
72
Cost of materials
2. Cement 0.17 bags 290/Bag 49.00
3. Brick 39 nos. 3200/Thousand 124.00
4. Steel Filter 4” Ø 1 nos. 25.00 each 25.00
5. P.V.C. Pipe 110 mm Ø 1.00 m 110/m 250
Total Rs. 531
Labour Charge
2. Sand Brick ballast 0.027 cum 33.33/cum 0.89
3. Brick Work 0.082 cum 370.00/cum 30.34
4. Plastering 0.63 m2 40.00/m2 25.20
5. Fixing of pipe & filter - - 25.00
Total Rs. 90.22
Total Expenditure
1. Cost of materials 531.00
2. Labour Charge 90.22
Total Rs. 621.00
Say Rs. 620.00 only
Total expenditure of soaking pit & silting tank
1. Soaking Pits 3580.00
2. Silting Tank 620.00
Total Rs. 4200.00
Say Rs. 4200.00 only
73
Entry point activities:
S.N. Village Work Amt. (Rs Lack)
1 Pusar Kharnja Repair With channel 180m 1.05
2 Adampur Community center roof R:C:C 5.00x3.70 0.97
3 Idarish Pur Kharnja Repair With channel 300m 1.90
4 Kanhar Kharnja Repair With channel 320m 2.20
5 Mojijabad Nagal Kharnja new With channel 270m 2.47
6 Dodhat - -
7 Nipura Kharnja Repair With channel 325m 2.46
8 Tikari -
9 Himmat Pur ,Sujati Kharnja Repair With channel 3808m 2.28
10 Parli Kharnja Repair With channel 190m 1.08
11 Gangauli Kharnja new With channel 225m 2.30
12 Magrauli Kharnja Repair With channel 125m 1.33
13 Chittamkheri Kharnja Repair With channel 200m 1.25
14 Begmabad Kharnja Repair With channel 80m 0.69
Total 19.98
74
75
Gabion check dams will be constructed in the watershed:
Details of the gabion check dams and other treatments are given in following table. Estimate for Gabion Check Dam (span - 8m)
for drainage line treatment
Sr.No. Particulars No. L B D Quantity

Super structure
1. Earthwork 1 No. 8.00 1.00 0.50 4.0 cum
2. Wire netting
(i) Upto spillway 37.20 sqm
(ii) Head wall extension 12.00 sqm
Total 2 (i) and (ii) 49.20 sqm
3. Collection of stone
(i) Upto spillway 1 No. 8.00 1.00 1.20 9.60 cum
(ii) Head wall extension 2 Nos. 1.50 1.00 0.60 1.80 cum
Total 3 (i) and (ii) 11.40 cum
Hand packing of stone
4. Same as item No.3 11.40 cum
into GI wire cages
Apron construction
5. Earth work 1 No. 8.00 1.50 0.50 6.00 cum
6. Wire netting 21.5 sqm
7. Collection of stones 1 8.00 1.50 0.50 6.00 cum
Same as
8. Hand packing of stones 6.00 cum
item No.7
Total quantities
Earth work (4+6) cum 10 cum
Wire netting (37.20+21.5) sqm 58.7 sqm

Collection of stones (11.4+6.0) cum 17.4 cum
Hand packing (11.4+6.0) cum 17.4 cum
GI wire 10 SWG 58.7 sqm@ Rs.1.28 kg/sqm 75.14 kg
76
Abstract of cost (for gabion check dam of span - 8m)
Sr.No. Particulars Quantity Rate/unit Amount (Rs.)
1. Earthwork 10 cum Rs.90/cum 900.00
2. Cost of GI wire 10 SWG 75.14 kg Rs.40/kg 3005.60
Collection and transportation of stone by @ Rs.
3. 17.4 cum 7830.00
head load upto 100 m distance 450/cum
Hand packing of
stones in GI wire
4. 17.4 cum RS.88/cum 1531.20
cages and tilting of
Boxes
5. Wire netting (labour charges) 58.70 sqm @ Rs. 5/sqm 293.50
Total 13560.30
Contingencies 3% 406.80
Grand Total 13967.10
Say Rs. 14000.00 per structure
77
DRAWING OF KRISHAK VIKAS MANCH
DRAWING OF PLATFOR A
0.40
6.00 0.60
5.00
0.15
0.05
ISOMETRIC
0.95 VIEW
5.00 0.15
OF PLATFORM
(CHABUTRA)
0.95
G.L.
G.L. DESCRIPTION
0.40
0.05
0.40
A’
0.10
0.80 1.00
1. SECTION- 1:4:8.
C.C.W. AT A-A’
2. Brick masonry- 1:4
3. Plastering- 1:4
4. Raised Pointing- 1:3.
78
DETAIL ESTIMATE OF KRISHAK VIKAS MANCH
S.No. Description of Work No L. B. D/H Quantity
.
1. Earth work in foundation
Long Wall 2 8.00 1.20 1.10 21.12
Short Wall 2 4.00 1.20 1.10 10.56
Total 31.68 cum
2. C.C.W. 1:4:8
Long Wall 2 6.60 1.00 0.15 1.98
Short Wall 2 3.60 1.00 0.15 1.08
Total 3.06 cum
3. Brick work 1:4 in foundation & super structure
1st Footing.
Long Wall 2 6.40 0.80 0.40 4.096
Short Wall 2 3.80 0.80 0.40 2.432
nd
2 Footing
Long Wall 2 6.20 0.60 0.40 2.976
Short Wall 2 4.00 0.60 0.40 1.920
Super Structure
Long Wall 2 6.00 0.40 0.90 4.320
Short Wall 2 4.20 0.40 0.90 3.024
Total 18.768 cum
4. Earth work in filling 1 5.20 4.20 0.75 16.38 cum
5. C.C.W. 1:4:8 1 5.20 4.20 0.15 3.276 cum
6. C.C.W. 1:2:4 1 6.00 5.00 0.05 1.500 cum
7. Raised Pointing 1:3
Long Wall 2 6.00 - 0.90 10.80
Short Wall 2 5.00 - 0.90 9.00
Total 19.80 m2
79
ABSTRACT OF WORK
1. Earth Work 31.68 + 16.38 48.06 cum
2. C.C.W. 1:4:8 3.060 + 3.276 6.336 cum
3. Brick Work 1:4 18.568 cum
4. C.C.W. 1:2:4 1.500 cum
5. Raised Pointing 1:3 19.80 m2
CONSUMPTION OF MATERIALS
S.No. Particulars Quantity Cement Coarse Bricks G.S.B. 25- Stone Grit
(cum) Sand 40 mm 10-20 mm
(cum) (cum) (cum)
1. C.C.W 1:4:8 6.336 cum 21.54 2.851 - 5.892 -

2. Brick Masonary 18.768 cum 45.04 6.381 9400 - -
3. C.C.W. 1:2:4 1.500 cum 9.15 0.630 - - 1.275
4. Raised Pointing 19.800 m2 0.91 0.093 - - -
Total 76.64 11.995 9400 5.892 1.275
Say 77 Bags 12.000 9400 5.900 1.280
COST OF MATERIALS
1. Cement 77 Bags 290/Bag 22330.00
3. Bricks 9400 3200/ th. 30080.00
4. G.S.B. 25-40 mm 5.900 cum 1000/cum 5900.00
5. G.S. Grit 10-20 mm 1.280 cum 1250.00/cum 1600.00
Total Rs. 77910
80
LABOUR CHARGES
2. C.C.W. 1:4:8 6.336 cum 494.00/cum 3129.98
3. C.C.W. 1:2:4 1.500 cum 494.00/cum 741.00
4. Brick Masonary 1:4 18.768 cum 370.00/cum 6944.16
5. Raised Pointing 1:3 19.800 m2 51.61/cum 1021.87
6. Curing Charges 18.768 cum 25.00/cum 469.20
7 Chowkidar 6 Man Days 100.00/Man Day 600.00
.
Total Rs. 14,736.73
Total Expenditure
1. Cost of Materials 77910.00
Total Rs. 92647.00
Say Rs. 92700.00 only
81
DRAWING OF TREE GUARD
DESCRIPTION.
1. Brick work = 1:4.
2. Plastering = 1:4.
3. Thickness of wall = 0.11 m.
4. Total height of brick guard = 0.32 + 1.50 = 1.82 m.
Tree 5. Diameter = 1.2 m.
Brick
Guard
0.32 m
1.50 m
G.L. G.L.
1.20 m
82
Detail estimate of brick guard:
S.No. Description of work No. L B D/H Quantity

1. Earthwork for tree 1 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.216
In foundation 1 3.14x1.09 0.20 0.30 0.205
Total 0.421
2. Brick work 1:4 Solid Glazed
In foundation 1 3.14x1.09 0.11 0.40 0.151 -
In super structure with glazed 1 3.14x1.09 0.11 0.48 - 0.181
Solid 1 3.14x1.09 0.11 0.08 - 0.030
Glazed 1 3.14x1.09 0.11 0.40 - 0.151
Solid 1 3.14x1.09 0.11 0.16 0.060 -
Total 0.211 0.362
3. Plastering 1:4 1 3.14x1.20 - 0.07 0.264
1 3.14x1.20 - 0.15 0.565
1 3.14x1.09 - 0.07 0.239
Total 1.068 m2
S.No. Description of work Quantity Brick Nos. Cement Coarse

Bags Sand
1. Brick work 11 cm thick 1:4 0.211 cum 100 0.29 0.050
Brick work glazed 0.362 cum 86 0.25 0.043
2. Plastering 1:4 1.068 m2 - 0.11 0.016
Total 186 0.65 0.109
Say 190 0.65 0.110 cum
83
Cost of Materials:

nd
1. Brick II class 190 nos. 3650.00 693.50
2. Cement 0.65 Bags 290.00 189.00
3. Coarse sand 0.110 cum 1500.00 165.00
Total Rs. 1047.00
Labour Charges

2. Brick work 0.391 cum 370.00/cum 144.67
3. Plastering 1.068 m2 40.00/m2 42.72
Total Rs. 203.87
Head load and transportation 20% of material cost - Rs. 191.87

Total Expenditure
1. Material 1047.00
2. Labour 203.87
3. Head load and transportation 191.87
Total Rs. 1442.00
Say Rs. 1450.00 only.
84
DRAWING OF C.B., S.B., P.B., AND M.B. (Not to Scale)
0.70
0.50
0.90
0.70
2.60 3.40
2
(C.B., Cross-Section – 1.085 m ) (S.B., Cross-Section – 1.845m2)
0.70
0.50
4.60
0.50
1.50
(Field Bund, Cross-Section – 0.50 m2) (S.B. /P.B. /M.B., Cross-Section – 3.445 m2)
(All dimensions in Meter)
85
DRAWING OF EARTHEN CHEKDAM / GULLY PLUG
(Not to Scale)
2.00
1.50
2.10
9.90 12.00
(C.D. /G.P., Cross-Section – 11.97 m2) (C.D. /G.P., Cross-
Section – 17.50 (W.H.B., Cross-Section – 22.00 m2)

2.50
2.75
13.50
(All dimensions in Metre)
86
DESIGN OF CONTOUR BUND
Type of Soil Sandy loam

Rain fall -24 hr in cm -25 cm
Field Stop -1%
Vertical Interval (VI) = [s/3+2] x 0.3
= [1/3+2] x 0.3
= 0.70 m
Horizontal Interval (HI) = 100 x V.I/s
= 100 x 0.7/1
Height of bund h = Re=maximum rainfall in cm
=
=
= 0.59
Say 0.60 m
Free board =15% of height minimum -10 cm
Height = 0.60 + 0.10
= 0.70 m
Taking top width of bund 0.50 m and side slope 1.5:1
Then base of Bund = 0.50 + (1.50 d) x 2
= 2.60 m
Cross-Section of bund = (0.50 + 2.60) x 0.70 / 2
= 1 .085 m2
Length of bund = 100 s / V.I.
= 100 x 1 / 0.70
=142.85 m/ha
Say 150 m/ha
Earth work/ha = 150x1.085
= 162.75 cum
Cost Rs. / ha = 162.75 x 39.16 = 6373.29
Say 6375.00
87
DESIGN OF SUBMERGENCE BUND
Types of soil –Clay Rainfall intensity for 24 hrs – 25cm
Field slope 3% V.I.=[s/3+2]x0.30
=0.90 m
Horizontal Interval = (100xV.I.)/s = (100x0.90)/3
=30 m
Height of bund h= = = = 0.67 m. Say 0.70m
Free board 20% of height minimum 20cm
Total Height =0.90m
Taking top width of bund 0.70m and side slope 1.5:1
Bottom of bund = 0.70+2 x 1.5d

= 0.70+2.70
= 3.40
Cross Section of Submergence Bund = (0.70+3.40) x 0.90 / 2
= 1.845 m2
Length of bund = 100 s / V.I.
= (100 x 3) /0.90
= 333 m
Feasible length 100 + 25 + 25
= 150 m
Earth work/ha =150 x 1.845
=276.75
Cost per ha =276.75 x 39.16
=10,837.53
Say 10,850=00
88
TYPICAL SECTION OF FIELD BUND
Top width = 0.50 m
Side slope = 1:1
Height of bound = 0.50 m
Bottom Width = 1.50 m
Cross section = (0.50+1.50)x0.50/2 = 0.50 m2
Length per hectare = 200 m
Earthwork = 200 x 0.50 = 100 cum
Cost 39.16/cum = Rs. 3916.00
Cost per hectare = Rs. 3916.00
TYPICAL SECTION OF P.B., M.B., S.B.

Top width = 0.70 m
Side slope = 1.5:1
Height = 1.30 m
Bottom = 4.60 m
Cross section = (0.70+4.60)x1.30/2
= 3.445 m2
Cost/ meter = Rs. 142.oo
TYPICAL SECTION OF EARTHEN CHECK DAM / GULLY PLUG

Top width = 1.50 m
Side slope = 2:1
Height = 2.10m
Cross section = (1.50 + 9.90) x 2.10 / 2
= 11.97 m2
Cost per meter = Rs. 551.45
89
TYPICAL SECTION OF CHECK DAM / GULLY PLUG
Top width = 2.00m
Side slope = 2:1
Height = 2.50 m
Cross Section = (2.00 + 12.00) x 2.50 / 2
= 17.50 m2
Cost /meter = Rs. 839.12
TYPICAL SECTION OF W.H.B
Top width = 2.50 m

Side slope = 2:1
Height = 2.75 m
Cross section = (2.50 + 13.50) x 2.75 / 2
= 22.00 m2
Per meter cost = Rs. 1085.92
90
HORTICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
Horticulture is an important component of land use management. Now India is the second largest producer of fruits in the
world after Brazil. However, 53% of the total geographical area of the country is degraded due to various reasons. Fruit trees and fruit
based systems are the viable alternatives for economic utilization of such lands. The basic philosophy behind the conservation
horticulture is the use of available resources and skillful choice of fruits. The use of available soil moisture , collection of the runoff
water from the catchment area to make up the deficit requirements as well as in situ water harvesting techniques are some of the
measures . The in situ water harvesting techniques should be used for growing trees in such a way that each tree has its own micro
catchment area. The success of the conservation of horticulture entirely depends on the selection of economically viable hardy
varieties of fruit crops resistant to moisture stress or drought and other adverse climate conditions. The fruit crops selected for
degraded lands must be such that their maximum growth take place during the period of maximum water availability in the soil and
should have low demand.
The main constraints which restrict development of the horticulture land use in degraded lands are enumerated below:
(A) Basic constraints
1- Lack of suitable agro-techniques for degraded lands
2- Lack of trained resource persons
3- Inadequate dissemination of the technologies
4- Lack of community approach
5- High biotic interference
6- Lack of infrastructure including marketing.
(B) Soil constraints

1- Poor nutrient status of the soil
2- Physical impediment
3- Moisture stress / water logging / inadequate drainage.
(C) Plant related constraints

1- Problem of plant establishment
2- Physiological disorders
3- Fruit drop and poor productivity
4- Incidence of insects-pests.
However , apart from the above mentioned constraints, the measure bottleneck in horticulture development are poor
technological advancements, high initial establishment cost, high input demand , timely operation and seasonal shortage of labours,
etc.
91
CONCEPTS AND ADVANTAGES OF CONSERVATION HORTICULTURE
Conservation horticulture or horticulture land use based on soil and water conservation principle is a suitable alternative for
utilization and management of land under rainfed conditions. Thus horticulture development in watershed management appears to be
the most appropriate technique for sustained productivity as well as for restoration of degraded lands. In fact, horticulture system meet
all the basic needs-food, fruits, fodder, fuel and timber besides, providing employment and sustaining a number of products for
industries.
The fruit trees grown with crops can provide fuel from pruned shoots and dried branches, leaf fodder for animals and leaf
litter that can be utilized as mulch material and organic matter the leaf litter of deciduous fruit trees not only protects the top soil from
the impact of raindrops but also improve soil structure, reduces evapotranspiration, increases infiltration and add to the nutrient status
of soil. Therefore conservation based horticulture land use system assumes great significance as fruit trees on degraded lands provide
higher returns and offer alternative opportunity in non-arable areas where cropping may not be possible.
CONSERVATION HORTICULTURE PRACTICES
Some of the important practices are given below
1. Selection of Suitable Fruits Types: For the success of conservation horticulture, selection of hardy varieties resistant to diseases
and pests and use of local or other hardy root stocks for raising fruit-trees is of great importance. The major part of the reproductive
cycle ie. Period from flowering to fruiting must also fall during maximum water availability period and the root ripening must be
completed before the onset of dry summer (April-May).
Ber, Guava, Karonda, Bel, Amla, Lemon, and Grave etc. are the plants which fulfill this requirement and all these fruit plants are most
suitable for UP. West region.
2. Planting Techniques: For degraded lands, pits should be dug of 1m x 1m x 1m size, the excavated soil is mixed with Farmyard
Manure (FYM) @ 5-10kg/pit with doses of potash and phosphorous and some insecticide / pesticide (numicide / aldrex) for prevention
of white ant. Planting of the fruits plants should be done with the onset of monsoon.
3. Use of Root Stokes: Budding and grafting on the wild root stock gives benefit of the establishment root and in turn provides better
quality fruits with high field potential. For example, Ziziphun mauritiana, a wild ber can be successful budded with scion of improved
cultivars, This practice is only successful where sizable patch of wild root stock is available. The budded/grafted stock needs intensive
management as it is required to be protected from the wild animals, birds, insects, pests etc. The wild root stock develops efficient top
root to provide moisture and nutrients to the scion. Alma. Bel is other examples of raising the improved cultivation the wild root stock.
4. In Situ Water Harvesting: Since on sloppy lands, runoff water is considerably higher, therefore, it should be harvested and used.
The run off can be utilized for growing fruit plants in such a way that each tree in the established plants is at the time of fruit setting
and fruiting. Moisture available at this critical period improves the fruit yield.
92
Runoff water will be harvested and stored in tanks during the rains. The stored water will be utilized at the time when the fruit
trees show moisture stress during dry months. Counter trenches will dug between the rows of fruit trees because this is effective in
conserving moisture and providing soil erosion.
Mulching: Mulching is practiced to conserve moisture. It prevents the loss of moisture by evaporation and improve water intake by
the soils. Various organic (Straw, hay, manure, tree leaves, dry wads) Mulches are used for mulching. Use of plastic mulch has been
taken in rainfed and dryfarrming conditions to increase the productivity by minimizing evapotranspiration losses.
Drip Irrigation: Drip irrigation saves water by 40 to 70 percent and two to three times mare area can be irrigated with the same
amount of available water. It has the advantages that it ensures uniform distribution of water, provides perfect control over water
application and minimizing the losses during convergence and seepage.
Farming system and Micro Enterprises

Traditional cropping system is adopted by the farmer in the project area. So that other source of income is limited. It is essential to
diversify the farming system for the prosperity of the farmers. The following system shell be insure the improvement of farming
system as well as micro enterprises:
Farming System
• Vermi- composting and organic farming.
• Dairy
• Goat Farming
• Fisheries
• Poultry
• Fruit and vegetable farming
• Agro forestry
• Beekeeping
• Pig Farming
• Silviculture
Micro Enterprise
• Mini Dal Mil
• Rice Polisher
• Oil Speller
• Mini Crasher for Sugar Production
• Purchases Shop
93
• Mobile Repairing Shop
• Cycle/Motorcycle Repairing Shop
• Hand Pump Repairing Shop
Their estimate is given as under

Social Forestry
Through social forestry farmers can gain extra income other than agriculture. Sagaun and Popular plantation is proposed under
social farming their sample estimate is given below:-
• Popular plantation
• Sagaun plantation
• Shoo babool
Livelihood activities for land less people and SHG

The following revenue generating activities in dal farming in the project area for the poorers, land less people and SHG to their
prosperity
• Dairy Development
• Goat Farming
• Poultry
• Nursery
• Tailoring
• Vermi compost
• Organic Patricides Prop
• Food grain packaging & marketing
• Preparation of by Product of Agriculture Production
Live Stock Development

• Sterilization Deshi bull and ox.
• Devouring of cattle
• Artificial Inseminations
• Balance Feeding
• Proper medical facilities provide
• Awareness Trading Programme
In forest farming: To full fill the gap of fuel vilaitee babool plantation in waste land proposed Vilaitee Babool – 1.00 Hact.
94
Estimate of orchard Development in the watershed with Fencing
A-HORTICULTURE Mango Orchard
S.N0. Particulars Quantities rate amount remark

1 Soil working 1Mx1Mx1M
size pits1000No.incuding of refilling 1000 35 35000
2 Application of Farmyard manure 1000 2 2000
including cost
3 Cost of NPK mixture neemicide 1000 1.5 1500
Cost of plant(including transportationand planting 1000 35 35000
4
Casualty replacement@10 of
5 itemNo.4 100 35 3500
6 Cost of weeding and hoeing 1000 2 2000
Total 79000
7 Contingency unforeseen (3%) 2370
Total 81370
Say 81500
Maintenance cost I year
15% of 1st year 12220
For next 5year i.e.12220x5 61100
142600
8 Fencing 50000
Total
cost 192600
Farmer share 40% 77040
Govt. share 60% 115560
95
Estimate of Mango Orchard Development in the watershed
size pits 215No.incuding of refilling 215 35 7525
including cost
3 Cost of NPK mixture, neemicide 215 1.5 322.5
including
Cost of plant( transportation 215 35 7525
4 and planting
5 itemNo.4 21 35 735
Total 16967.5
7 Contingency unforeseen (3%) 509.025
Total 17476.525
Say 17500
Maintenance cost IIyear15% of 1st year 2625

8 Cost of raising agricultural crops7500/ha 7500
Total
cost 38125

96
A. HORTICULTUREWITH JAYTROFA
size pits1000No.incuding of refilling 1000 35 35000
including cost
3 Cost of NPK mixture,neemicide 1000 1.5 1500
Cost of plant(including transportation and planting 1000 35 35000
4
Casualty replacement@10 of itemNo.4
5 100 35 3500
Total 79000
7 Contingency unforeseen(3%) 2370
Total 81370
Say 81500
Maintenance cost IIyear
15% of 1st year 12220
142600
Total
cost 142600
97
A. HORTICULTURE Papaya Plantation
including cost
3 Cost of NPK mixture,neemicide 1000 1.5 1500
4
Casualty replacement@10 of itemNo.4
5 100 10 1000
6 Cost of weddings and hoeing 1000 2 2000
Total 26500
7 Contingency unforeseen(3%) 795
Total 27295
Say 27300
15% of 1st year 4095
35490
8 Fencing 50000
Total
cost 85490
98
Estimate of Papaya plantation Development in the watershed
B AGRI-HORTICULTURE Popular Plantation

including cost
3 Cost of NPK mixture,neemicide 215 1.5 322.5
4
5 Casualty replacement@10 of itemNo.4 21 35 735
Total 16967.5
7 Contingency unforeseen (3%) 509.025
Total 17476.525
Say 17500
Maintenance cost I year
8 Cost of raising agricultural crops7500/ha 7500
Total
cost 38125

99
Estimate of Orchard Development in the watershed with Fencing
A. HORTICULTURE Mango Orchard
including cost
3 Cost of NPK mixture,neemicide 100 60 6000
including
Cost of plant( transportation 100 30 3000
4 and planting
5 itemNo.4 10 30 300
Total 14000
7 Contingency unforeseen (3%) 420
Total 14420
Say 14500
25375
8 Fencing 14500
Total
cost 39875
100
Establishment of Goat Units for S.H.G.’s formed in I.W.M.P. –III BAGPAT Project
District Meerut is situated in U.P.West region where the number of sheep is very less and they are small in nature. Goat
population is appreciable and in fact, it is the major source of livelihood for poor people of the district. In the state, on an average, 16
kg of meat is obtained from a goat, if they are deformed twice, there shall be increment of 4 kg in meat on an average, benefiting the
farmers of the state.
Deworming and vitamins, mineral- supplement to the goats shall enhance their productivity and also improve anti-body
response and protection level through vaccination, i.e., importance in efficiency of vaccination. More productivity and assured health
and low mortality shall result into adoption of more farmers to goat farming with the formation of more S.H.G.’s and in turn
availability of goats for processing units. Goat excreta shall be of immense help in enrichment of soil fertility.
Goat husbandry is profitable in western UP due favorable geo-climate conditions and land pattern. Goats thrive well in dry and
semi-dry climate with bushes and thorny vegetation. Presently in this area, farmers rear goats for their livelihood. If goat husbandry
would be transformed to intensive husbandry, there shall be more economic stability of farmers, more profit sharing and availability of
running capital for future expansion. Keeping in view the above facts, goat units shall be formed in the area in intensive way. A
register of S.H.G. will be maintained by Secretary of S.H.G. in the supervision of W.D.T. member. The details of beneficiaries of
S.H.G. including the breed of goat reared, breeding and feeding status, deworming status, deaths, post mortem conducted claim
settlement and working status of unit will be maintained in the register. Ten Goat Units are proposed in III.I.W.M.P. Project for
S.H.G. One unit constituting 20 goats and 1 buck will be distributed to one S.H.G.
Preferences shall be given in consecutive years in purchasing the goats and bucks for new units, from old units for which
database maintained shall be of use and it should be assured by buy back arrangement.
Financial Component
S.No. Component Amount
1. Cost of 20 goats of improved breed (not less than 6 months of age) @ Rs. 4000.00 each 80000.00
2. Cost of 1 buck of improved breed @ Rs. 5000.00 5000.00
3. Cost of insurance @ 11.63 / unit 1220.00
4. Feed cost for 3 months @ 250 gm/ day for goats @ Rs. 11.84/ 250 gm 22375.00
5. Provision of deworming, mineral and vitamin supplement, treatment, vaccination @ Rs.160/ animal 3360 .00
6. The expense including monitoring expenses, register and records @ Rs. 170.00/ unit 170.00
Total Rs. 112125.00
Say Rs. 112125.00
101
Dairy Farming
Regarding income generating activities through Self Help Group, landless and marginal farmers are advised to use three or four
Hybrid cow or two or three buffalos of MURRA or NEELI breed, for their lively hood.
Estimate of Livestock Development Activities
Total number of female animals: Buffalo - 19281

Cow - 3556
Total - 22837
1. Artificial Insemination (A.I.): 33% of total animals per year, i.e. 7536
Amount required for A.I. by BAIF @ 125/ animal.
Total Amount Rs. 942000
2. Vaccination: Total number of animals in I.W.M.P. I - 22837 nos.
1. H.S. + B.Q. @ 6.50 148440
2. F.M.D. @10.50 239788 (Twice in a year)
Total Amount Rs.776497
3. Deworming: Adult animals 22837
Child animals - 1450
Albendazole for 22837animals @ 40.56 926268
1450 child animals @20.28 29406
Total Amount Rs. 955674
4. Mineral Mixture: Agrimine Forte Cheated for 22837 animals @ 125.00 Rs. 285462
GRAND TOTAL - Rs. 2959633
102
Sample Estimate for Nursery Establishment IWMP-III BAGPAT Area 1.0 ha.
S.NO. Items Unit Rate Amount
1 New Nursery Survey, Clarence, leveling ha 1 100 100
2 Tillage work upto 0.30 mts. 1 525 525
3 Bunding & Partition, Channel, Ha 525 525

road, (lOx1.25 mts.) and mixing of manure
4 Preparation of seed showing No. 800 12 9600

5 Seed Showing in Bags No. 20,000 15.80/000 316
6 Plantation Development in Bags. No. 800 0.16 128
7 Purchasing of soil, sand & Cmt. 194 966.37 18747.58
FYM(30x40cm) for Bags.
8 Pesticides mixing in Bags No. 20000 3600/000 72000
9 Pesticide purchasing & No. 20000 10.89/000 475.8
Utilization. 12.90/000
10 Irrigation & sowing of seed No. 20000 88/000 1760
(Preparation of Pricks) -
11 Printing work No. 20000 90/000 1800
12 Changing of Place & yielding No. 20000 124/000 2480
13 Changing place after 6 month No. 20000 84/000 16800
14 Nirai & Gudai of Orchards No. 20000 27/000 540
Total 125796
103
Detail Estimate for 1.00 Hact. Afforestation work in Project IWMP –III BAGPAT
S..No. Detail of work Unit Quantity Rate Amount Remark
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Safety Trenching at Running mt. 500 34.48 17240
Border of area 1.2-1.0/2X.90
2 Clearance of Plantation Spot area Ha 1 157 157
3 Excavation of pits (0.60rnXO.60rnXO.60m) Nos. 1000 7.16 7160
Purchasing of Farmyard
4 manure (0.50 ct./fit) Cu 500 8.5 4250
S. Filling of pits with mixing farmyard Nos. 1000 0.8 800
manure..06mX.06mX.06m
6 Cartage for Plants @3% loss Nos. 1030 3.93 4047.9
7 Local Cartage of Plants Nos. 1000 1.412 1412
8 Plantation work Nos. 1000 4.3 4300
9 Irrigation of Plants (16ton) Nos. 16000 2.299 36784
10 Mulching, Trraining and prooning of Nos. 4000 0.52 2080
Plant (4 tunes)
Urea &11
Pesticides spray (2Tone) Nos. 2000 0.5 1000100
12 Plantation labour (July to march) Nos. 78xl 100 7800
13 Purchasing of Plants. Nos. 1000 50 50000
Steel Board for
14 Identification. Nos. 1 1800 1800
Total - - - 138831
104
Name of plan Citrus
Row to row distance-6mts.
Plant to Plant distance- 6mts.
Plants Area -1.00 ha.
Plant Population - 278 Nos.
Estimate for 1.00 ha Area,.
S.No. Items Unit Qty. Rate(Rs) Amount.
1 2 3 4 5 6
4448
1 Pit alignment Nos 278 6/pits
2 Excavation of foundation Nos 278 3/pits 834

( 0.60xO.60xO.60)
3 Filling of Pit with Fertilizers Nos 278 0.60/pits 167

4 Purcharge of seed ling Nos 278 50.00/pits 139
with transportation.
5 FYM with In-secticides. Nos 278 0.80/pits 222
6 Plantation of seed ling. Nos 278 4.30/pits 1195
7 Display Board Nos 1 Nos. 1800 each 1800
Total Rs 8805
105
Sample Estimate for Production System & Micro Enterprises.
Estimate for demonstration: 40% amount Expend in Kharif Crop & 60% Amount Expended in Rabi crops
against allocated fund for production system & micro enterprises.
Management:
• Selection of seed; Draught resistance high yielding variety.
• Integrated Nutrient Management use 50% ( FYM + Bio fertilizers)
• Integrated Weed & Paste management. 50% Chemical fertilizers
• Water Application; Sleeted Crops in Kharif & Rabi Season
Kharif - Bajara, TiI, Moong, Urd, Fodder Bajara, Ohaincha.Rabi - Mustard, Wheat. Lantil, Gram, Jou (fodder), barseem.
Name of the Kharif crops / per ha. cost

S Item
N Bajara Til Urd Moong Bajarafodder
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Quantity of seed in kg 6 kg 4kg 15kg 15kg 15-20kg
Cost Rs./kg 200 150 125 100 200
Cast of seed 1200 600 1875 1500 3000
2 Use of Fertilizer
Quantity of Urea in kg 80 15 4.5 4.5 85
Rates/kg 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3
Amount 424 79.5 23.85 23.85 450.5
Quantity of DAP in kg 65 45 45 45 65
Rates / kg 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
Amount In Rs. 682.5 472.5 472.5 472.5 682.5
Quantity of MOP in kg 35 25 17.5 17.5 5.1
Rates/kg 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
Amount 178.5 127.5 89.25 89.25 26.01
3 Past and weed manage Rs.2500Rs./ha. 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500
Water Application per ha. 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 4985 3779.5 4960.6 4585.6 6659.01
106
Cost per ha demonstration for Rabi crops
Items Name of Rabi crops/ per ha. Cost.

S.N
o. Mustard Wheat Lental Gram Jou Barseen
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Quantity of seed kg. 4.5 120-130 50 kg 15 100 30
Seed cost Rs/ Kg 160 22 125 100. 20 120
Cast of seed 640 2640 6250 1500 2000 5100
2 Use of Fertilizer
Quantity of Urea in kg 85 kg 105 - - 87.5 26kg
Rates 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3
Amount' 450.5 556.5 - - 463.75 137.8
Quantity of DAP in kg 65 kg 65 kg 65 kg 65 kg 55 kg 45 kg
Rates / kg 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
Amount 682.5 682.5 682.5 682.5 577.5 472.5
Quantity of MOP in kg 35 35 kg 25 kg 25 kg 42.50 kg 17 kg
Rate 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
Amount 86.7 178.5 127.5 127.5 216.75 86.75
3 Paste & weed management 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500
2500 Rs./ ha.
4 Water Application 3000 7500 1500 1500 1500 20000
Total cost/ ha. 7359 14057 11060 14810 7258 28297
Say Total 7400 14000 11 000 15,000 7300 28300
107
Sample Estimate for Income generating activities through S.H.G. for land less & marginal formers
A. Goat farming
1 Purchase of Male Goat @ 3000 each 60000
2 Purchase of Male Goat @ 5000 each 5000
3 Medical Treatment @ 50 Rs each/year 1050
Total 66050
Benefit 700 to1000 Rs. Per Goat due to milk & selling of goats
B. Poultry farming :(Broiler)
1. Cost of Chuja (Van Raja) 50 No.@ Rs 15 7500
2. Cartage 500
3. Medicine/-Medical Treatment 200
4.Cage, housing etc. 5000
Total 6200
C Beekeeping
1.Purchage of bee box 10 no.@3000/box 30000
2 .Colony 10 @1000 Rs/ colony 10000
3.Equipments & Tools etc 10000
Total 50000
D. Mini Dal Plant
1. Purchase of Machine 15000
2. Seed money for Purchasing grain 50000
3.Sick machine Bag etc. 5000
Total 70000
E. Nursery Unit Total 50000
108
DRAWING OF NADEP COMPOST STRUCTURE
2.40
0.23
3.00
1.20
3.46
PLAN
0.30
DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION 1. Brick work = 1:4.
2. Plastering = 1:4.
3.46 3. Thickness of wall = 0.23 m.
4. Total height of Structure = 1.20 + 0.30 = 1.50 m.
(Not to Scale)
109
Preparation of compost by NADEP method
Nadef is the name of inventor of this method. In this method glazed pit of brick masonry above Ground level is made as shown
in the drying. In this method by using a little quantity of cow during, and crop residue, leaf of trees, straw and other organic materials.
The method of filling up the pit is below.
First of all best soil of pond or field is spread in the bottom of pit as least 3” thickness and then one layer of 6” thickness and other
agriculture waste is made then best soil is spread on it and on this layer the liquid made of cow dung is spread to wet the crop residue,
straw etc. this method is repeated until the pit is net completely filled up. On the top layer of this material a bulk is made and then the
pit is closed by earthen gara. Water is spread on the top of bulk and from glazed side weekly. This process is repeated to moist the
filling material always. The decomposition in filling material started and within six month filled material becomes compost khad.
Estimate of compost by NADEP method

1. Earth Work
Long Wall 2 3.60 0.30 0.30 0.648
Short Wall 2 2.33 0.30 0.30 0.419
Total 1.067 cum
2. Brick Work 1:4
Long Wall Solid 2 3.46 0.23 0.90 1.432
Short Wall Solid 2 2.40 0.23 0.90 0.993
Total 2.425 cum
Long Wall Glazed 2 3.46 0.23 0.60 0.954
Short Wall Glazed 2 2.40 0.23 0.60 0.662
Total 1.616 cum
3. Plastering Work
Long Wall 2 3.46 - 0.60 4.152
Short Wall 2 2.40 - 0.60 2.880
Top of Long Wall 2 3.46 0.23 - 1.591
Top of Short Wall 2 2.40 0.23 - 1.104
Total 9.727 m2
110
Abstract of work
S.No. Particulars Quantity
1. Earth Work 1.06 cum
2. Brick Work 1:4 2.425 + 1.616/ 2 3.233 cum
3. Plastering 1:4 9.727 m2
S.No. Particulars Quantity Cement Coarse Bricks (nos.)
(Bags) Sand
(cum)
1. Brick work 1:4 3.233 cum 5.82 0.873 1487
2. Plastering 1:4 9.727 m2 1.07 0.146 -
Total 6.89 1.019 1487
Say 7 Bags 1.02 cum 1500 nos.
Cost of materials
1. Cement 7 Bags 255.00/ Bag 1785.00
2. Coarse Sand 1.02 cum 910.00/ cum 928.20
3. 1st class Brick Work 1:4 1500 nos. 4050.00/ Thousand 6075.00
Total Rs. 8,788.20
Labour charges
1. Earth Work 1.06 cum 36.66/ cum 30.85
2. Brick Work 3.233 cum 370.00/ cum 1196.21
3. Plastering 9.727 m2 40.00/ m2 389.08
Total Rs. 1616.14
Total Expenditure
1. Cost of Materials 8788.20
Total Rs. 10,404.34
Say Rs. 10,400.00 only
111
DEMONSTRATIONS
A. Demonstration of wheat
Variety recommended for Bagpat Irrigated: PBW 550, DBW16 &17 Un-irrigated: C 306, Raj 3765, Raj 1555
Seed rate -100 -125 Kg/ha Requirement of fertilizers/ha N-150 Kg, P-75 Kg, K-75 Kg
Estimate of demonstration of wheat in watershed (per ha)
S.No. Particulars Quantity Rate(Rs) Amount Remark
1 Tillage operation or preparation of 1.0ha 1000.00/ha 1000.00 Since the project is to
field for sowing be operated in a
2 Cost of seed 100kg 25/kg 1800.00 participatory
3 Sowing by seed drill 1.0ha 1000.00/ha 1000.00 Mode, contribution in
4 D.A.P. 18:46 160kg 573.00/ 50 kg 1833.60 form of the tillage,
5 Urea 210kg 270.00/ 50 kg 1134.00 sowing, irrigation and
6 Potash (M.O.P.) 150kg 300.00/50kg 900.00 harvesting done by
7 Irrigation(three irrigation) 1.00ha 650.00/ha 650.00 farmer is not included
8 Harvesting 1.00ha 2000.00/ha 2000.00 in the estimates
Total 12217.00
Say 12220.00
Hence demonstration cost of wheat /ha is Rs. 12220.00
112
B. Demonstration of Arhar
Variety recommended for Bagpat: UPAS 120, Pusa 992, ICPL 151, Pusa 33
Seed rate -15 Kg/ha Requirement of fertilizers/ha N-20 Kg, P-60 Kg, K-40 Kg
Estimate of demonstration of Arhar in watershed (per ha)
1 Tillage operation or preparation 1.0ha 1000.00/ha 1000.00 Since the project is to be
of field for sowing operated in participatory
2 Cost of seed 15kg 85/kg 1275.00 Mode, contribution by the
3 Sowing by seed drill 1.0ha 1000.00/ha 1000.00 farmer in the form of
4 D.A.P. 18:46 130kg 573.00/ 50 kg 1490.00 tillage, operation, sowing
5 Potash (M.O.P.) 100kg 300.00/50kg 300.00 and harvesting provided by
6 Plant protection 1.0ha 1000/ha 1000.00 participating farmers,
7 Irrigation 1.00ha 650.00/ha 650.00 hence this cost is not
8 Harvesting 1.00ha 2000.00/ha 2000.00 included in the estimates.
Total 8715.00
Say 8720.00
113
C. Demonstration of Lentil
Variety recommended for Bagpat: PL 4, PL 306,PL 5etc
Estimate of demonstration of Lentil in watershed (per ha)
3 Sowing by seed drill 1.0ha 1000.00/ha 1000.00 farmer in the form of tillage,
4 D.A.P. 18:46 130kg 573.00/ 50 kg 1490.00 operation, sowing and
5 Potash (M.O.P.) 100kg 300.00/50kg 300.00 harvesting provided by
6 Plant protection 1.0ha 1000/ha 1000.00 participating farmers, hence
7 Irrigation 1.00ha 650.00/ha 650.00 this cost is not included in
8 Harvesting 1.00ha 2000.00/ha 2000.00 the estimates.
Total 12540.00
Say 12550.00
114
D. Demonstration of Gram/Pea
Variety recommended for Bagpat: Gram: Avrodhi, WCG 1,2, K8 etc Pea: Aparna, Azad pea 5,Arkil P 6
Estimate of demonstration of Gram/Pea in watershed (per ha)
3 Sowing by seed drill 1.0ha 1000.00/ha 1000.00 farmer in the form of tillage,
4 D.A.P. 18:46 130kg 573.00/ 50 kg 1490.00 operation, sowing and
5 Potash (M.O.P.) 100kg 300.00/50kg 300.00 harvesting provided by
6 Plant protection 1.0ha 1000/ha 1000.00 participating farmers, hence
7 Irrigation 1.00ha 650.00/ha 650.00 this cost is not included in
8 Harvesting 1.00ha 2000.00/ha 2000.00 the estimates.
Total 13815.00
Say 13820.00
115
E. Demonstration of Mustard
Variety recommended for Bagpat Irrigated: Pusa Bold, Pusa Gold, Kranti, etc Un-irrigated: Kiran , Varuna
Seed rate -5-6 Kg/ha Requirement of fertilizers/ha N-100 Kg, P-40 Kg, K-20 Kg
Estimate of demonstration of mustard in watershed (per ha)
7 Irrigation &Plant Protection 1.00ha 950.00/ha 950.00 farmer is not included
Total 5860.00
Say 5860.00
116
F. Demonstration of Hybrid Bajra
Variety recommended for Bagpat Irrigated:
Estimate of demonstration of Hybrid Bajra in watershed (per ha)
7 Irrigation &Plant Protection 1.00ha 950.00/ha 950.00 farmer is not included
Total 6722.00
Say 6220.00
117
Demonstration of agro-horticulture using plastic drum of 200 lit. capacity
District Meerut is situated in U.P WEST region where there is scarcity of water and in summer temperature rises up to 420c
causing upper layer of fields dry and therefore mortality rate of plants is very high. Farmers usually like to grow grain crops only.
They are not interested in horticulture because of less holding. The production of crops decreases below the tree.
Therefore to promote horticulture with crops a demonstration model using plastic drums for horticulture is made. Mainly crops
roots go in to the soil up to “4-5” in cereal crops and “6-9” in pulses. Using plastic drums the plants will be planted 50-60 cm below
the ground level which is below the root zone of crops. Therefore trees will not able to take nutrients from upper layer of fields and
there will no effect of plants on crops.
In summer season up to 1 to 1.50m depth of soil becomes dry causes more mortality rate of plants, using drums plants are
planted below 50-60 from Ground level and in rainy and winter season up to February roots of plants goes below 2.10m below where
moisture will be available and plants will be safe in summer also. Using barbed wire fencing the plants will be protected by others.
Therefore, it is hoped that farmers will adapt this procedure for Agro-forestry and will become prosperous.
Detail estimate of demonstration of horticulture and mixed cropping for 1.00 ha.

1. Earth work in cutting 156 3.14 x 1.20 - 1.35 793.54
Trench 156 1.50 0.75 0.75 131.62
Fencing Poll 133 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.064
Total 926.22 cum
2. Farm yard manure 156x10 1560 kg
3. Filling of earth work with farm yard manure 156 3.14 x 1.00 - 1.20 587.80 cum
4. C.C.W. 1:2:4 for fencing poll 133 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.064 cum
5. Angle iron for poll 133 1.80 - - 239.40 m
6. Barbed wire 3 400 - - 1200.00 m
7. Plants 156 - - - 156 nos.
8. Plastic drums (200 litre) 156 - - - 156 nos.
118
CONSUMPTION OF MATERIALS
S.No. Description of Work Quantity Farmyard Cement Coarse G.S.Grit Angle Barbed Planting
Manure Bags Sand 10-20 Iron (m) Wire Drum
(kg) (nos) (cum) mm (kg) (nos)
1. C.C.W. 1:2:4 1.064 cum - 6.49 0.446 0.883 - - -
2. Angle iron 239.4 m - - - - 239.40 - -
3. Barbed wire 1200.0 m - - - - - 1200.0 -
4. Farmyard manure 1560.0 kg 1560 kg - - - - - -
5. Plastic drum 156 nos. - - - - - - 156
Total 1560.0 kg 6.49 0.446 0.883 239.40 1200.0 156
Say 1560.0 kg 6.50 0.450 cum 0.900 239.40 1200.0 156
bags cum m
COST OF MATERIALS
1. Farm yard manure 1560.0 kg 10.00/kg 15600.00
2. Barbed wire 1200.0 m/120.0 kg 60.50/kg 7260.00
3. Angle iron 239.40 m/785 kg 40.50/kg 31792.50
4. Plastic drum 156 nos 690.00 each 107640.00
5. Cement 6.50 bags 255.00/bag 1657.50
6. Coarse sand 0.450 cum 910.00/cum 409.50
7. G.S.Grit 10-20 mm 0.900 cum 1250.00/cum 1125.00
8. Plants 156 nos 18.00 each 2808.00
Total Rs. 1,68,292.50
LABOUR CHARGES
2. C.C.W. 1:2:4 1.064 cum 492.00/cum 523.88
3. Fixing of angle iron 10 Man Days 100/Man Day 1000.00
4. Fixing of barbed wire 15 Man Days 100/Man Day 1500.00
Total Rs. 58,527.85
119
Total Expenditure
1. Cost of materials 1,68,292.50
2. Labour Charges 58,527.85
Total Rs. 2,26,819.50.00
Say Rs. 2,26,820.00 only
Demonstration of green manuring

Green Manuring is very useful but due to sowing of Kharif season crop, lack of suitable type of seeds, and limitation of
moisture, it is not widely practiced. Green Manuring brings immediate advantage because of its quick decomposition where as FYM
and compost improves the soil physical condition in the long-run. Benefits of Green Manuring accrue from substitution of chemical
fertilizers, enhance soil biological activities and erosion control due to vegetative cover.
Sesbania Species (Dhaincha) and Crotolaria Juneea (Sunhemper Sanai) are most common green manure crops. They
accumulate about 100 kg N/ha in their biomass and 64-88% of this is derived from atmosphere. Apart from direct benefit of green
Manuring as a source of nutrients and organic matter, it has the capacity to mobilize soil phosphorus and other nutrients. It also helps
in reclamation of problem of soil, e.g., Sesbania helps in removing exchangeable sodium and reclamation of salt affected soils.
In District BAGPAT more fields are kept fallow and only single crop in Rabi is grown. Therefore, this area is suitable for
Green Manuring. Therefore, in I.W.M.P. IInd Project, efforts will be made to oblise the farmers for Green Manuring
A typical estimate is made for Green Manuring is given below:
Estimate for green manuring in the watershed (per ha)

S.No. Particulars Rate Cost Remark
1 Seed of Sesbania (Dhaincha)25Kg/ha 25.00/Kg 625 Since the project is to be operated in a
2 Tillage operation before sowing and to 1000/ha 2000.00 participatory mode, contribution in
plough the plants of Dhaincha after 40- Before and after the form of tillage will be done by
45 days of sowing for Green Manuring. saring farmers is not included in the
estimate.
Total Rs. 625.00
Therefore cost per hectare of Green Manuring is Rs. 625.00/ha
120
PASTURE MANAGEMENT
Introduction: The sound animal industry in any country centers around good quality feed and fodders. The livestock
population in India is nearly 15%of the total livestock population of the world, tough we have only 2% of the world’s geographical
area. The project on for green and dry fodder requirement in India has been estimated at 1061 and 590 million tons by 2010 A-D,
while the present feed and fodder resources in the country can meet only 4% of the requirement. The grazing intensity is very high i.e.,
26 adult cattle unit (ACU)/ha as against 0.8 ACU in the developing countries.
The importance of grasses for protection and production, the two aspects of soil and water conservation is well known.
Grass is unique in that it is the only resource utilized in situ by grazing. A “grassland” or more appropriately, a “range” is defined as
“the areas which are predominantly covered with grasses or grass like plants and are primarily utilized as for age for grazing animals
or used as hay.” The grasslands are the major sources of food to the animals.
Pasture Management: All grazing areas are referred to as pastures, but ore specifically the term is applied to cultivated grassland used
for grazing. Thus pastures are artificial grasslands with or without non-grass vegetation (such as legumes) that are created with
selected high forage-yielding grass and legume species and with inputs like fertilizers and irrigation and carefully managed to exclude
all other vegetation. Pastures are usually fenced and used either for grazing, for gay and silage making or for both.
Intensive Fodder Production: In areas where the major enterprise of the farmers centers around the milk production. Continuous
supply of green fodder round the year is the basis for success of such as industry. Under the aegis of ICAR’s all India coordinated
Research Project on Forage Crops, several highly productive fodder cropping system have been tested and recommendations made for
their general use. For central region important intensive crop rotations are presented as given below:
Zone wise crop rotations Green fodder yield(t / ha)

Central region
Hybrid Napier +Cowpea-Berseem+Japanrape 286.3
Maize+Cowper-Jowar-Berseem+Japanrape 197.2
Jawar+Cowper-Berseem+Japanrape-Jawer+Cowpea 168.6
Agola of Sugarcane
Conservation on of Forages: In order to sustain animal production, it is essential that the optimum feeding should be maintained
round the year. In India, we have two seasons, rainy season and winter season, when surplus quantities of green fodder is available-
country to this there are 2 to 3 months of lean periods(October-November and April to July) when the fodder availability to animals is
at its low. In the summer months, it is difficult even to meet the maintenance requirements of the animals. Stage of maturity to feed the
animals adequately during the lean period. The conservation of forages could be done in the form of silage from cultivated fodders
121
(legumes and cereals) and also pasture grasses. Forages could also be conserved in the form of hay when dried to its nutrients. This
feed stuff is quantitatively important from both maintenance and nutritional point of view.
Agro-forestry system for fodder production: A number of fodder trees play an important role in human food security through their
function as animal food sources, especially as drought services. Agro-forestry systems consisting of such tress and animals and/or
pasture are called Silvo-Pastoral system.
Silvi-pasture (or Silvo-pastoral system) is the most promising alternate land use system which integrates multipurpose trees,
shrubs, legumes and grasses mostly on non-arable, degraded and marginal lands for optimizing land productivity. It helps in
conservation of vegetation, soil and nutrients and provides forage, timber and fuel wood on a sustainable basis.
Potentials of Semi-arid region for different forage production systems
Region Forge Production Systems

Semi arid cultivated Integration of Agro-Silvi-Pasture, dry land agriculture on lands. Forage-cum- arable crop
lands with Forming on the marginal and sub marginal land and intercropping of legumes
ROLE OF GRASSLAND IN SOIL CONSERVATION

The grass plant itself protects the soil from the forces of water erosion including the impact of rain drops and surface flow.
Grass acts a spring cushion intercepting and broking up the falling rain drops in their way down. Conducting the water down the
blades and stems of the plants and finally allowing it to reach the ground as fine sprays without disturbing the surface. Clamps of grass
plants, in a mechanical way, obstruct-flowing water and reduce its rate of flow.
In fact to control soil erosion whatever technique is adopted, there are four approaches to deal with the problem:
• To condition the soil to make it resistant to determent and transportation and create more absorptive surface layer.
• To cover the soil so that it is protected from the impact of wind and rain drops.
• To decrease the velocity of wind or runoff water.
• To provide safe disposal outlet for surplus run off.
Grass in the nature highly efficient device to protect the soil from destructive forces like rain , wind etc. Grass and legumes
increase the aggregation of soil particles; improve soil structure and water holding capacity of the soil. Grasses gives quicker
protection to eroded lands. To establish gully sides, water ways, gully head and check dams. Grass is perhaps the most effective and
economical tool. It can put to various uses in soil conservation:
• Strip cropping, rotational cropping or lay farming.
• Stabilization of bunds and terraces.
• Stabilization of gullies, diversion or drainage channels.
122
• Stabilization of sand dunes.
• Meadows and pasture on steep slopes
• Fertility builder for eroded soi
In Vedas, Upanishad and Puran, the importance of trees is said. There are 27 Nakshatras in a year and there is one of each
Nakshtra.The people should planted the tree of their Nakshtra, And they should be never destroyed
The name of Nakshtra and their tree are as follows:
S.No. Name of Nakshatras Name of Tree

1. Ashwini Kuchila
2. Bharini Aamla
3. Kritika Goolar
4. Rohini Jaamun
5. Mrigshira Khair
6. Aadra Agar
7. Punarvasu Baans
8. Pushya Peepal
9. Ashalekha Chameli
10. Magha Bar (Banyan)
11. Purvafalguni Dhak
12. Uttarafalguni Pilkhen
13. Hasta Jaai
14. Chitra Bel
15. Swati Arjun
16. Vishakha Babool (Acacia)
17. Anuradha Naagkeshwar
18. Jyeshtha Shambhal
19. Mool Raal Vriksha (Bitumen)
20. Purvaashadha Bait (Cane)
21. Uttaraashadha Panash
22. Shrawan Aak
23. Ghanishtha Jaanthi
24. Shatbhisha Kandab
25. Purvaabhadrapad Aam (mango)
26. Uttaraabhadrapad Nimbu (Lemon)
123
Average cost of Bunding up to field 3 % slope
Average lengths of bunds per ha. 481 m

Cross sectional area of the bunds 0.90 sq m
Total earth for bunding per ha. 432.90cum
a. Average cost of earth work involved in bunding per ha.(@ Rs 40 per cum) Rs.17320.00
b. Average cost of renovation of existing bunds of the cross section 0.05sq. m Rs. 962.00
Total Cost 16358.00

Say Rs. 16360.00 per ha. Cost of bunding
Average cost of minor leveling in the bunded fields
Cost of minor leveling in the bunded fields is Rs. 7500 .00 per ha and about 250 land require minor land leveling in the
watershed. Which will cost about Rs. 18.75 lacks Crop production
Mulching and crop residue management
The sources of mulching material as brought up mulch i.e. litter or pruned material of trees etc are scarce in the watershed.
The weeds, in situ grown legume and multi purpose trees (as hedge row or on marginal and degraded lands) are some of the options
available with growers for mulching the rain-fed crops for moisture conservation, fertility restoration and other purposes. Therefore,
weed mulching and hedge row of MPTs will be demonstrated in the watershed for benefit of the rural community.
Green manuring
Intensive cropping with inadequate application of organic manures i.e. FYM, compost etc, has over exploited the existing
agricultural production system in the watershed. In order to improve the fertility as well as physico-chemical properties of soils green
manuring insitu and ex-situ with suitable crops like dhaincha, sun-hemp and neel are proposed to be demonstrated in the watershed
areas of IWMP-III BAGPAT
124
Vermi-composting
In order to provide quality manure with high nutrient content to various field crops, vegetables and cash crops , to save time
and proper disposal of on farm organic refuse and cow dung as well as to promote organic farming, vermin-composting will be
demonstrated to the farmers so that within a short period they can be able to produce manure from organic waste.
Crop rotation and intercropping
In order to diversify farm produce, minimize the farming risk, mitigate soil erosion, to ensure nutritional security and to
optimize farm return, intercropping of legumes (black gram and green gram) in inter row spaces of bajra are proposed to be
undertaken in the watershed during kharif season. Sustainable and profitable crop- rotations suiting to various needs of the people of
the watershed will be demonstrated.
Bio-fertilizers
The various beneficial bio-fertilizers like nitrogen fixers, phosphate solubliser and organic matter decomposers for both legumes
and non legumes will be demonstrated in the farmer’s field under the watershed villages.
Tillage operations
Deep tillage technology developed at the Agra center holds promising in enhancing post monsoon residual soil moisture
conservation and improving the yield of subsequent mustard crop. This technology is proposed to be demonstrated for benefit of
farmers in the watershed
Introduction of improved seeds of high yielding varieties (HYV)
Replacement of low yielding traditional varieties of jowar, gram and lentil in the villages in the watershed with improved
varieties is necessary for improving the productivity and farm income. These HYVs will be demonstrated in the watershed for the
benefit of the farmers.
Balanced fertilizer use
Inadequate and imbalanced fertilizer use in bajra and jowar during kharif season and in wheat, mustard, gram and lentil in rabi
season are one of the major constraints in agricultural production system of the watershed. Therefore, balanced fertilizer use in
different crops will be demonstrated in the watershed for the benefits of the farming community.
125
Control of insect pest and diseases
Aphid in the mustard and pod borer in gram are the major insects in the watershed areas leading to loss in crop productivity.
Similarly white blister is also a common disease in the mustard crop. The management strategies of these insect pests and diseases
will also be demonstrated in the watershed for benefit of the growers.
Management of the crop
The recommended technology (13.7) of crop management will be demonstrated to the farmers in half plot trial approach so as
to enable the farmers to assess the benefits and impact of each technology or package of practice for their ultimate adoption in the
watershed. The interventions scheduled on prioritization of problems in the crop production following PRA and surveys target
specifically solution of the each and problem related to the crop production as per interventions at 13.7. The specific problems, if any
shall be dealt with contingency budget.
Dry land Horticulture
About 20 ha of land are suitable for horticultural development. Species like Bael and Ber will be planted at suitable spacing in
the watershed
Agri- Horticulture
Aonla and Sahjan would be a suitable horticultural crop to the locality. Therefore, about 5 ha land in the farmers field shall be
selected and brought under Agri-horti system. The cropping system followed will be Bajra and Wheat.
Plantation:
Fuel wood plantation: About 28 ha land will be taken from the waste land falling in the class-VII category in the watershed. These
lands will be planted with species like Prosopis juliflora, Acacia nilotica, Prosopis cineraria and Holoptelia integrifolia.
126
Establishment of Farm Implement Center (FIC)
Establishment of six Farm Implement Center is proposed in watershed management plan of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed,
that will created the Employment to the rural youths besides improving the soil productivity and agriculture production in the
proposed watershed.
The detail expenditure of Farm Implement Center (FIC) is as follows:
S.NO. Particulars No./Unit Unit Cost Rs. Subsidy Total Cost
Cost Lakh Rs. Lakh
a Cost of Implement
1 Tractor 1 4.5 4.5 30% 1.35
2 Laser leveler 1 3.5 3.5 50% 1.75
3 Tractor driver mold broad plough 3 0.4 1.2 50% 0.60
4 Sub Soiler 5 0.3 1.5 50% 0.75
5 Mechanical leveler 2 0.4 0.8 50% 0.40
6 Power sprayer 5 0.1 0.5 50% 0.25
7 Ridge maker 2 0.2 0.4 50% 0.20
8 Ferti –seed-drill 2 0.7 1.4 50% 0.70
9 Raised bed planter 5 0.8 4.0 50% 2.00
Sub Total - - - - 8.00
b Establishment cost and other Expenditure (for five years) - - - - 2.00
Total 10.00
G. Total (Six Unit) 60.00
127
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT
Sustainability and environment security
In the proposed watershed management plan of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed, proper blending of bio engineering measures
will be applied on 60 % of the total watershed area. Based on the results of studies conducted in this region, it is estimated that
more than 50 % of the watershed area will be treated and consequently the soil loss and runoff from the area is expected to be
reduced by 70 % and 65 %, respectively. The proposed land use plan will improve the land utilization index and crop diversification
index significantly as compared to the existing one. It will help in maintaining ecosystem integrity on sustained basis along with
improving the livelihood security of the farming community.
Economic Analysis
Economic analysis of the project was carried by taking direct benefits and costs considering 25 years project life at 10 per cent
discount rate. For this purpose of economic analysis, whole watershed development plan was divided into three sector namely,
agriculture, horticulture and forest/Fuel wood plantation. Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost ratio ( BC ratio criteria were
employed to judge the economic efficiency of each enterprise and sector
Agriculture
In rainfed agriculture, the development cost can be recovered within one year as the present rain fed agriculture is being done on well
maintained field, therefore, does not require much investment. In irrigated agriculture, investment of Rs. 395.71 lacs is proposed to
make. The BC ratio of this sector is 1.8: 1 with in three years pay back period.
Economics of agriculture sector
S.No. Sector Area (ha) NPV (Rs.) BC ratio
1 Irrigated agriculture 630.80 31143000 1.5:1
2 Rainfed agriculture 4625.00 83960000 1.3:1
3 Total 5255.80 115103000 1.4 :1
128
Horticulture
Economic analysis of horticulture plantation in Agri-horti system at IWMP-III Bagpat watershed. Project life is considered to be 25
years and discount rate for NPV estimation is 10%
SN Common Name Area (ha) NPV of Net Benefit (Rs) B:C Ratio
1 Popular 95 31515000 6.4:1
2 $agaun 75 86300000 24:1
3 Guava 75 1425500 4-8:1

4 Papaw 45 1280000 24:1
Total 290 134975500 14.8:1
Economic analysis of fuel wood plantation at IWMP-III BAGPAT watershed. Project life is considered to be 25 years and
discount rate for NPV estimation is 10 %
SN Common Name Scientific name Area (ha) NPV of Net Benefit (Rs) B:C Ratio
1 Vilayati Babul Prosopis juliflora 25 384482 2.1:1
Food sufficiency
Achieving self sufficiency in food production is one of the prime objectives of the project. The status of food requirement and
production before and after the project is presented in Table.
Status of food requirement and availability per annum in IWMP-I Bagpat watershed
Sr. Items Require Before project Proposed

No. ment Availability Deficit or Availability (q/yr) Deficit or surplus (q/yr)
(q/yr) (q/yr) surplus (q/yr)
1 Cereals 1944 1757 -147 2250 + 493
2 Pulses 586 248 -187 1030 + 782
3 Oil seeds 446 4971 +4542 5628 + 657
4 Vegetable 1464 79 -1385 1550 + 86
129
130
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY (PIA)
U.P. Government, Land Development And Water Resources Department section -1 Lucknow has nominates as PIA to Bhoomi
Sanrakshan Unit, Land development and water resources Department Meerut vide letter no-666(10)/54-1-10-1(9)02008 Dated 25-5-2010.
Detail Staffing Pattern of PIA:
S.No. Name Designation Qualification Experience
(Year)
1 Sri S.K.Singh B.S.A. intermiate In Ag.Engg.Diploma 31
2 Sri S.P.banshwar JR.Engr intermiate In Ag.Engg.Diploma 27
3 Sri Gulab .Singh JR.Engr M.A.Econamics, Ag.Engg.Diploma 27
4 Sri Ashok Rastogi Accountant M.Com. 7

5 Sri Mon Pal Singh D/Man B.A. Diploma in Draft man 33
6 Sri Ram Kishor Mishra A.S.C.I. B.Sc.(Ag) 27
7 Sri Ramveer Singh Work in charge B.A. 25
8 Sri Bhoopendra Kumar Work in charge B.A. 21
9 Sri Hari Ram Work in charge intermiate 22
10 Sri Girand Singh Work in charge intermiate 21
11 Sri Jiledar Singh Work in charge intermiate 22
131
Institutional Arrangement at Project level:
Project management Agency (PIA)
The SLNA would evolve appropriate mechanisms for selecting and approving the PIAs, who would be responsible for implementation of
watershed projects in different districts. These PIAs may include relevant line departments. Autonomous organizations under State/Central
Governments, Government Institutes/Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOS).
However, the following criteria may be observed in the selection of these PIAs:
1- They should preferably have prior experience in watershed related aspects or management of watershed development projects.
2- They should be prepared to constitute dedicated Watershed Development Teams.
Selected PIAs will sign a contract/MOU with the concerned DWSUs/District Level Committee as referred in para29 that will spell out
well –defined annual outcomes, against which the performance of each PIA will be monitored each year and evaluated on a regular basis by
institutional evaluators from a panel approved by the SLNA/Departmental Nodal Agency at the central level.
Each PIA must put in position a dedicated watershed development team (WDT) with the approval of DWDU. The WDT will be hired
on contract/deputation. Transfer etc for a term not exceeding the project period. The composition of the WDT will be indicated in the
contract/MOU. No programme funds for DPR and watershed works under any circumstances should be released to either the PIA or Watershed
Committee (WC) unless the composition of the WDT has been clearly indicated in the MOU/contract and the team members are fully in place.
Roles and Responsibilities of the PIA:

The project Implementing Agency(PIA) will provide necessary technical guidance to the Gram Panchayat for preparation of development
plans for the watershed through Participatory Rural Appraisal(PRA) exercise, undertake community organization and training for the village
communities, supervise watershed development activities, inspect and authenticate project accounts, encourage adoption of low cost
technologies and build upon indigenous technical knowledge, monitor and review the overall project implementation and set up institutional
arrangements for post-project operation and maintenance and further development of the assets created during the project period.
The PIA, after careful scrutiny, shall submit the action plan for watershed development project for approval of the DWDU/DRDA and
other arrangements. The PIA shall submit the periodical progress report to DWDU. The PIA shall also arrange physical, financial and social
132
audit of the work undertaken. It will facilitate the mobilization of additional financial resource from other government programmes, such as
NREGA, BRGF, SGRY, National Horticulture Mission, Tribal, Welfare Schemes, Artificial Ground Water Recharging, Greening India, etc.
CONSTITUTION OF W.D.T. BY P.I.A.IWMP-III BAGPAT

One W.D.T. have constituted vide letter No B.S.A/60/I.W.M.P./W.D.T/2010-11 Dated 15-12-1010.
The Detail of W.D.T. is as below
S.No. Name of the member Qualification Experience
year
1 Dr. R.B.Yadav Associate Professor, Ph.D. Agronomy
Deptt. of Agronomy 27
S.V.Patel.University of Agric. &Tech., Meerut
2 Sri Gulab Singh M.A Economics, Diploma in Ag. Engg 27
3 Sri Kiranpal Singh Pawar Diploma in Agriculture 35
4 Smt. Kamlesh Rana B.A. Social Work 15
WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT TEAM:

The WDT is an integral part of the PIA and will be set up by the PIA. Each WDT should have at least four members, broadly with
knowledge and experience in agriculture, soil science, water management, social mobilization and institutional building. At least one of the
WDT members should be a woman. The WDT members should preferably have a professional degree. However, the qualification can be
relaxed by the DWDU with the approval of SNLA in deserving cases keeping in view the practical field experience of the candidate. The WDT
should be located as close as possible to the watershed project. At the same time, it must be ensured that the WDT should function in close
collaboration with the team of experts at the district and state level. The expenses towards the salaries of the WDT members shall be charged
from the administrative support to the PIA. DWDU will facilitate the training of the WDT members.
133
Roles and Responsibilities of WDT:
The WDT will guide the watershed committee (WC) in the formulation of the watershed action plan. An indicative list of the roles and
responsibilities of the WDT would include among other s, the following.
a. Assist Gram Panchayat /Gram Sabha in constitution of the watershed committee and their functioning.
b. Organizing and nurturing User Groups and Self-Help Groups.
c. Mobilizing women to ensure that the perspectives and interests of women are adequately related in the watershed action plan.
d. Conducting the participatory base –line surveys, training and capacity building.
e. Preparing detailed resource development plans including water and soil conservation or redemption etc. to promote sustainable livelihood at
household level.
f. Common property resource management and equitable sharing.
g. Preparing Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the consideration of Gram Sabha.
h. Undertake engineering surveys, prepare engineering drawing and cost estimates for any structure to be built.
i. Monitoring, checking, accessing, and undertaking physical verification and measurement of work done.
j. Facilitating the development of livelihood opportunities for the landless.
k. Maintaining project accounts.
l. Arranging physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken.
m. Setting up suitable arrangements for post-project operation, maintenance and future development of the assets created during the project period
134
DETAIL OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE & SUB WATERSHED COMMITTEE IWMP-III BAGPAT
S. Name Of Date Of Name Of Name Of Female Member Member Of Member Of Member Of Land Less Work WDT
No GramPan Constitut Precedent Secretary Member SC SHG UG UG Member Charge Member
chyat/Vill ion
age
1 Pusar 19-2-11 Shri Shri Smt.Kusum Shri Shri Shri Shri Shri Girend Gulab Singh
.Deshpal Rameswar Chandarpal Surendar Ashokkuma Mukesh Subhash Singh
r
2 Adampur 19-2-11 Shri Shri Pradeep Smt Ganga dei Shri Virendra Shri Shri Shri Shri Girend GulabSingh
Indrapal S/oKhileri VirendraS/o Santrsam Krasnpal Tuhiram Singh
Trilokcha.
3 Idarish 19-2-11 Smt. Rekha Shri Smt. Vabli Shri Raju Shri Shri Shri Babu Shri Gurooba GulabSingh
Devi Ramkishan Rajendar Brajesh Ram Dharmvee x Singh
Pur
r
4 Kanhar 20-2-11 Smt.Munes Shri Shyam Smt Saroj Shri Jaipal Shri Shri Smt. Smt. Gurooba GulabSingh
h singh Ramchand Shreepal Baburam Yograj x Singh
5 Mojijaba 20-2-11 Shri Shri Yashveer Smt. Mannu Shri Shreepal Shri Shri Shri Shri Gurooba GulabSingh
SahaDev Singh Rajendar Naubahar Rampal Virendar x Singh
d Nagal
6 Dodhat 20-2-11 Ch.Vayara Shri Kuldeep Smt Om Kali Shri Pritam Shri Shri Manga Shri Smt. Kailla Gurooba GulabSingh
npawar Singh Rampal Akhatar x Singh
Singh
7 Nipura 20-1-11 Shri Shri Vikash Smt Rajbala Shri Jagpal Shri Shri Gopal Shri Rajpal Shri Girend GulabSingh
Krashanpal Harveer Ompal Singh
Singh
8 Tikari 20-1-11 Shri Shom Shri Pradeep Smt Kaushlaya Shri Ashok Shri Prem Shri Ashok Shri Shri Om Bhoopen GulabSingh
Pal Kshayap Chand Kumar Jashwant Prakash dar
Singh
9 Himmat 19-1-11 Shri Shri Rakesh Smt Sarswati Smt. Bavita Shri ShriYashve Shri Jaidev Shri Vinod Bhoopen GulabSingh
Kishanpal Sharma Naimpal er Singh kumar dar
Pur Sujati
Singh
10 Parli * 19-1-11 Shri Shri Arvind Smt Sudha Shri Rajendra Shri Gareve Shri Harpal Shri Rajpal Shri Vinod Bhoopen GulabSingh
Kuldeep Kumar Devi kumar dar
11 Gangauli 19-1-11 Shri Shri Jitendar Smt Jagveeri Shri Suresh Shri Saudan Shri Shri Shri Girand GulabSingh
Dhamendar Virendar Devendar Ompal Singh
Rathi
hu
135
FORMATION OF SELF HELP GROUP
S.No Name Of Village Name of SHG President Secretary Work
1 Pusar Ramabai, SHG Chandra Pal s/o Kale Ram Ravindra s/o Keerat Singh Stitching & knitting
2 Adampur Vibha, SHG Sant Ram s/o Ratan Singh Virendra Singh s/o Dairy work/FIC Stitching &
Khelari knitting
3 Idarish Pur Utthan, SHG Dharamveer s/o Hari Ram Raju s/o Gopi Dairy work/ FIC/Stitching &
knitting
4 Kanhar Gandi, SHG Ompal s/o Lal Singh Smt. Saroj w/o Budh Dairy work/ Stitching &
Prakash knitting
5 Mojijabad Nagal Durga, SHG Sunil s/o Rajendra Gang s/o Karma Goat keeping/ FIC/Stitching &
knitting
6 Dodhat Uday, SHG Vadpal Singh s/o Bhavar Krishipal s/o Bhoop Goat keeping/ FIC/Stitching &
Singh Singh knitting
7 Nipura Samaj Sudhar, Nadim s/o Akram Shaid s/o Habibur Goat keeping/ FIC/Stitching &
SHG Rahman knitting
8 Tikari Dr. Bheemrao Sava Ram s/o Mahar Singh Budh Prakash s/o Niyadar Goat keeping/ FIC/Stitching &
Ambedkar, SHG knitting
9 Himmat Pur Sujati Kashyap, SHG Sube Singh s/o Bhanwar Ram Fool s/o Braham Goat keeping/ Stitching &
Singh Singh knitting/FIC
10 Chittamkhaeri Rojgar, SHG Rajendra Singh s/o Jai Pawan Kumar s/o Shiv Goat keeping/ Stitching &
Singh Kumar knitting/FIC
11 Gangauli Kashi Ram, SHG Pradeep s/o Shyam Singh Kishori s/o Dash Goat keeping/ Stitching &
knitting/FIC
136
DETAILS OF USER GROUPS
User Groups (U.G) have constituted of homogeneous groups of persons which are more affected by each work/ related activity and has
include those having land holdings within the watershed area.
S.No. Name Of Micro Watershed Area Of Micro Watershed ha Selected Area For No. Of User Group
Treatment Constituted
1 2C6A3a3i 726.56681 413.739 5
2 2C6A3a3d 793.5342 451.8735 5
3 2C6A43a3e 683.69701 389.327 4
4 2C6A3a3h 568.3095 323.6206 4
5 2C6A3a3g 748.1759 426.0447 4
6 2C6A3a3f 830.6675 473.0187 9
7 2C6A3a4a 578.0250 329.153 6
8 2C6A3a4j 356.2245 202.8500 3
9 2C6A3a4i 514.76643 293.1308 6
10 2C6A3a4b 602.9255 343.334 5
11 2C6A3a4c 596.3393 339.58201 8
12 2C6A3a4h 309.650 176.3284 4
Total 7308.88 4162.00 63
137
PHASING OF WORKS (Financial and Physical)
Phasing of various works / activities during different years of the project period for treatable area 4162.00 ha out of total area 7308.88
ha is presented in Table
Financial outlay (Year wise financial outlays (lakh Rs.)
S. Component Unit 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year Total
No
A MANAGEMENT COSTS
Detail project report 4.99 - - - 4.99
Administrative cost- TA&DA, POL / Hiring of vehicles/office
and payment of electricity and phone bill etc. computer, 12.486 12.486 12.486 49.944
stationary and office consumable and Contingency 12.486
Expert for monitoring and evaluation Nos 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.24 4.994
Sub Total 18.726 13.736 13.736 13.728 59.933
B PREPARATORY PHSES
Entry Point Activities like improvement in drinking water
system, Panchayat Ghar Repair Playing park Nos 19.98 - - -- 19.98
With recharge water, Drain Repair Street light etc.
Institutional and capacity building 8.33 8.32 8.32 - 24.97
Sub Total 28.31 8.32 8.32 - 44.95
C WATERSHED WORKS
a Watershed development works
Construction of bunds (graded, contour and field bunds) ha - 250 250 250 650
Renovation of the existing bunds for in situ soil moisture
ha - 230 230 340 800
conservation
Minor leveling of bunded fields ha - 175 175 175 525
Dry land horticulture ha - 80 80 80 240
Construction of recharge filter Nos - 11 11 11 33
Generation of soil health card for individual farmers/land Nos - 20 20 5 45
138
holdings
Community pond Nos - 12 12 12 36
Renovation of existing water harvesting structure Nos - 3 3 3 9
Afforestation and development of silvi-pastoral systems ha - 121 121 122 364
Contour trenching ha - 122 122 122 366
Drainage line treatment (Gabion drop, structures, gully plugs and
Nos - 5 3 2 10
vegetative barriers)
Skill labour - 80 80 90 250
Sub Total
b LIVILIHOOD PROGRAMME(Community based)
Income generating activities through SHG's
25 25 - - 50
for landless and marginal farmers
a. Establishment of Vermi-compost units Units 18 18 - - 36
b. Mushroom cultivation Units 6 - - - 6
c. Bee keeping/others(Goat, Pig etc) Units 6 - - - 6
d. Block plantation of Prosopis juliflora for fire wood Unit - 3 3 - 6
Livestock development activities Unit 6 - - - 6
Sub Total
c PRODUCTION SYATEM AND MICRO ENTERPRISES
Crop production, diversification of agriculture and introduction
ha 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 26.00
of agro-forestry
Demonstration of improved composting system ha 7.00 5.14 6.00 6.14 24.28
Sub Total 13.50 11.64 12.50 12.64 50.28
D CONSOLIDATION PHASE 24.972 24.972
GRAND TOTAL
Note: Unit cost of different activities are given in annexure
139
Physical plan
Phasing of various works / activities during different years of the project period is presented
Physical plan phasing
Activities related to 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year Total
(quantity) (quantity) (quantity) (quantity
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
TA&DA, POL / Hiring of vehicles/office and payment of electricity and phone bill √ √ √ √
etc. computer, stationary and office consumable and Contingency
Expert for monitoring and evaluation √ √ √ √
PREPARATORY PHSES
Entry Point Activities like improvement in drinking water system, school, temple √ - - -
Institutional and capacity building √ √ √ √
WATERSHED WORKS
Watershed development works 1387 1387 1387 4162
Construction of community pond (Nos) 15 10 10 35
Construction of bunds (graded, contour and field bunds - 6270 6278 6264 18812
Renovation of the existing bunds and in situ conservation - 8890 8888 8888 26666
Minor leveling of bunded fields (ha) Lesser Levelling - 175 175 175 266.66
Dry land Horticulture development - 80 80 80 240
Steggered / Contour trenching (ha) - 180 90 40 310
Renovation of existing water harvesting structure (No) - 20 10 5 35
140
Afforestation and silvipastoral development (ha) - 255 125 380
Construction of recharge filter (Nos) - 15 7 3 25
Generation of soil health card for individual farmers/land holdings - 15 10 5 30
Drainage line treatment (gabion structure, gully plugs and vegetative barriers) (Nos) - 5 3 2 10
LIVILIHOOD PROGRAMME(Community based)
Income generating activities through SHG's for landless and marginal farmers 26 12 - 38
a. Establishment of Vermi-compost units - 36 - - 36
b. Mushroom cultivation/Bee keeping - 3 - - 3
c. Bee keeping - 6 - - 6
d. Block plantation for fire wood - - 1000 600 1600
Livestock development activities √ √ √ √
PRODUCTION SYATEM AND MICRO ENTERPRISES

Demonstration and assessment of improved composting system using alternate 40 20 5 - 65
materials (141ermin compost) and nutrient analysis (Nos.)
Introduction of improved crop production practices for kharif crops (ha) 10.00 5.00 2.50 17.50
ii) for rabi crops (ha) 10.00 5.00 2.50 17.50
CONSOLIDATION PHASE = √ -
*Indicates that the activity will be carried out as per head in the respective year.
141
Estimation and costing of the project
Abstract of estimation and costing of the IWMP-III Bagpat watershed
S.No. Total(Rs in
Component
lakes)
A Detail Project Report (D.P.R.) 1% 4.995
B MANAGEMENT COSTS
Administrative cost -TA&DA, POL / Hiring of vehicles/office and payment of electricity and phone bill etc.
computer, stationary and office consumable and Contingency 10% 49.944
Expert for monitoring and evaluation 2% 9.989

Sub Total 13% 64.928
B PREPARATORY PHSES
Entry Point Activities like improvement in drinking water system, Panchayat Ghar Repair Playing park
19.978
With recharge water, Drain Repair Indian hand pump Repair etc. 4%
Institutional and capacity building 5% 24.972
Sub Total 9% 44.949
C WATERSHED WORKS
a Watershed development works
Construction of bunds (graded, contour and field bunds) 30.10
Renovation of the existing bunds for in situ soil moisture conservation 40.00
Minor leveling of bunded fields 34.12

Dry land horticulture 12.00
Construction of recharge filter 15.00
142
Generation of soil health card for individual farmers/land holdings 7.00
Community pond 50.00
Renovation of existing water harvesting structure 5.50
Afforestation and development of silvi-pastoral systems 18.20

Contour trenching 14.30
Drainage line treatment (Gabion drop, structures, gully plugs and vegetative barriers) 16.00
Skill labour 7.50
Sub Total 50% 249.720
b LIVILIHOOD PROGRAMME(Community based)
5.00
Income generating activities through SHG' for landless and marginal farmers
a. Establishment of Vermi-compost units 18.00
b. Mushroom cultivation. Sahtoot and fruit plantation 6.20
c. Bee keeping.Goat.Pig. etc 4.50

d. Block plantation of Prosopis juliflora for fire wood 6.10
Livestock development activities and training, Family planning, Poverty elevation, 10.144
c PRODUCTION SYATEM AND MICRO ENTERPRISES
Crop production, diversification of agriculture and introduction of agro-forestry 8% 39.955
Demonstration of improved composting system 5% 24.972

D CONSOLIDATION PHASE 5% 24.972
GRAND TOTAL 499.440
143
IWMP-III BAGPAT(2010-11)
WORK CALADER YAER 2011-12
District BAGPAT
Particulars Ist.Year 2nd.Year30% 3rd.Year20% 4th.Year30% TOTAL
SL No.
Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy.
1
Administrative Cost 10% 12.49 15.53 15.53 6.39 49.94
Monitering-1%
2
1.25 1.55 1.55 0.64 4.99
3 Evaluation 1%
1.25 1.55 1.55 0.64 4.99
4
Entry Point activities 4% 19.98 19.98
5
Institution Capacity Building-5% 9.99 12.42 6.22 24.97
6 DPR-1% 4.99 4.99
7
WatershedDev.Work 50% 0.00 93.81 1563.50 53.73 895.50 102.20 1703 249.72 4162
8
Livelihood Activity 10% 29.96 9.99 9.99 49.94
9
Production System & Micro
enterprises 13% 19.98 14.98 14.98 14.99 64.93
10 Consoildation-5% 24.97 24.97
Total 99.89 149.83 99.89 149.83 499.44
144
IWMP-III BAGPAT(2010-11)
WORK CALADER YAER 2011-12
District BAGPAT Cost= 499.44
SL
No. Particulars April May June July August September October November December January February March Total
1 2.50%
Administrative Cost 10% 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.91 12.49
Monitering-1%
2 0.25%
1.55 1.25
3 Evaluation 1% 0.25% 1.55 1.25
4 Entry Point activities
4% 4% 4.95 4.95 4.95 19.98
5 Institution Capacity
Building-5% 2% 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.88 9.99
6 DPR-1% 1% 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 4.99
7 Watershed Dev.Work
50% 0% 0.00
8 Livelihoods Activity
10% 6% 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.71 3.73 29.97
9 Production System
& Micro enterprises
13% 4% 4.95 4.95 4.95 19.98
10 Consoildation-5% 0% 0.00
Total 20% 1.86 6.81 6.81 10.51 11.44 11.44 11.44 6.52 4.66 4.01 99.89
145
Expected/Estimated Outcomes of IWMP-II1(2010-1)BAGPAT
1 2 3 4 5
S.No. Item Unit Pre-project Status Post-project Status
1 Status of water table Meters BGL(M) 13 10
Ground water structures repaired/
2 renuvenated /hand pump NO's 350 45
3 Quality of drinking water Quality Normal Improved
4 Availability of drinking water No. of days 280 365
5 Increase in irrigated area Ha. 648.22 1112.05
Change in cropping/land use pattern
6 Area under agricultural crop Ha. 4162.00 4162.00
i Area under single crop Ha. 1818.00 1121.00
ii Area under double crop Ha. 1250.00 1847.00
iii Area under multiple crop Ha. 1094.00 1194.00
iv Cropping intensity % 155.00 175.00
7 Increase in area under vegetation
(tree cover) Ha. 24b 182
8 Increase in area under horticulture Ha. 150 645
9 Area under fuel & fodder Ha. 24 112
Precapita Per-
10 Increase in milk production day/Liters 4 to 5 6 to 7
11 No. of SHGs No's 0 26
12 Increase in Livelihood Rs./Capita/Annum Approx.28800 Approx.34200
13 Migration No's 1341 921
14 SHG Federations formed No's 2
15 Credit linkage with banks No's 0 13
146
147
IWMP –III BAGPAT
Name of Weigh No. of Project Rain fed Treatable area proposed for treatment P.I.A.
Project tage MWS Area (ha) Area (ha) (excluding reserve forests, etc.) (ha)
IWMP-III 102.5 11 6999 4625 4162 S.C.Unit of LDWR
148
149

Detail Project Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detail Project Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detail Project Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Integrated Watershed

Management Programme –III

DETAIL PROJECT REPORT (DPR)

Department of Land Resources,

5 Village wise detail of watershed 13

8 Climatic and hydrological feature 29

9 Detail of existing livelihood for poor 23

10 PRA exercise social maps 33

11 Problem typology of the watershed 43

13 Proposed land use 54

14 Socio economic analysis of the project 57

16 Entry Point Activity 75

18 Horticulture Development for Water Shed management 92

19 Farming System and Micro Enterprises 94

20 Estimate of Goat Unit for SHG 102

21 Drawing of NADEP compost structure 110

23 Pasture Management 122

24 Role of vegetative coverage in soil conservation work 123

25 Establishment of Farm Implement Center 128

26 Economic Analysis 129

27 Constitution of PIA, WDT, USER GROUP 131

28 Phasing of work financial & Physical 139

29 Work Calendar 146

30 Location (Road map) 148

31 Micro watershed map of Bagpat 149

Latitude 290 15’0’’to29012 0’

Elevation from MSL:

Highest Elevation in the watershed (above MSL) 235.00

Lowest Elevation in the watershed (above MSL) 220.00

Relief Height difference (m) 15.00

Source: India. gov.in/maps/Fig 1.

Stream characteristics of IWMP-III Bagpat watershed

Stream order Stream Number Mean stream length (m)

Human population in the IWMP-III Bagpat watershed

S. Total No of Land Holding(ha) Annual Gross Income(Rs) Total

SC ST Others SC ST Others SC ST Others Total

2 Small farmer 10393 - - - 921.90 - - 277.40 - 141.49 141.49 1885.69

6 S.C 115 70 35 92 97 118 121 223 30 215 90 336 8 16 1566

S.No. No. of persons Distance of

1 1865 452 2317 About 3month Not sufficient 40 Labour 3600/month -

Infrastructure social factures

SNo. Type of Infrastructure No. / Quantity Status

Venn Diagram of village Teekari

S.No Village Land uses (ha)

S. CPR Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha.)

(d) Crop classification:

S.N. Crop Classification Area (Hact.)

1 Single Crop 1818.00

2 Double Crop 1250.00

3 Multiple Crop 1094.00

S.N Season Crop Rain fed Irrigated Total

Total 3478 684 - - 4162

(c) Quality of Drinking Water

(e) Ground Water Structures to be repaired:

S.No. Type of structure No. available

S.No. Problems Rank

STRENGTH (S) WEAKNESS (W)

2. Geo-morphology and Soils:

S.No. Land use Present (ha) Proposed(ha)