1 EM Tensor Comparison: X y Z X Z y y Z X Z y X

1
EM Tensor Comparison
This document compares the electromagnetic field tensor presented in A

Student’s Guide to Vectors and Tensors (SGVT) to the equivalent tensor
in several other texts. It is not meant to provide additional information
about this tensor, but rather to help you understand why the tensor may
appear different when you encounter it elsewhere. This initial document
will compare the EM field tensor as presented in SGVT to the versions
presented in Griffiths’ Introduction to Electrodynamics, Jackson’s Clas-
sical Electrodynamics, and Shadowitz’s The Electromagnetic Field ; I’ll
add the versions of other texts based on readers’ suggestions.
The electromagnetic field tensor presented in Section 6.2 of SGVT has
the following form:
−Ex /c −Ey /c −Ez /c

 
0
 Ex /c 0 −Bz By 
F αβ =  .
 Ey /c Bz 0 −Bx 
Ez /c −By Bx 0
Notice that this is the contravariant form of the EM field tensor (in both
indices), so the first thing to check when making comparisons between
texts is that you’re using the same form with respect to contravariant
and covariant indices.
In Griffiths’ Introduction to Electrodynamics, the doubly contravariant
EM field tensor is presented as
 
0 Ex /c Ey /c Ez /c
 −Ex /c 0 Bz −By 
F µν =  −Ey /c −Bz

0 Bx 
−Ez /c By −Bx 0
2 EM Tensor Comparison
which differs by a minus sign from the version presented in SGVT. This
difference is attributable to the fact that Griffiths uses the sign conven-
tion of placing a minus sign on the time component and a plus sign on
the spatial components of four-vectors, and the opposite convention is
used in SGVT.
In Jackson’s Classical Electrodynamics, the doubly contravariant EM

field tensor is given as
0 −Ex −Ey −Ez
 
Ex 0 −Bz By 
F αβ = 


 Ey Bz 0 −Bx 
Ez −By Bx 0
In this case, the sign convention is the same as that used in SGVT,
but the electric-field terms do not contain the factor of 1/c included in
the SGVT version. The reason for this difference is that Jackson uses
Gaussian rather than SI units for all chapters after Chapter 10 of the
latest (third) edition of his book (that’s what the little “G” means after
the chapter headings on the top of the even pages). You can understand
the impact of those units by looking at Table 3 in the Appendix of the
Jackson text. There he indicates that you should make the following
substitutions to convert his equations between systems:
~
E
~ in SI
E → √ in Gaussian system
4π0
r
~ in SI mu0 ~
B → B in Gaussian system
4π
√
J~ in SI → 4π0 J~ in Gaussian system
If you make the appropriate conversions in the EM field tensor (as well
as in the expression relating the derivatives of the field-tensor elements
to the four-current), you can get to Maxwell’s Equations in the same
manner described in Section 6.2 of SGVT.
EM Tensor Comparison 3
In Shadowitz’s The Electromagnetic Field, the doubly contravariant EM

field tensor is written as
cBz −cBy −Ex
 
0
 −cBz 0 cBx −Ey 
F JK =  cBy −cBx

0 −Ez 
Ex Ey Ez 0
This appears quite different from the other versions of this tensor dis-
cussed above, but notice that a large part of this difference comes about
because the electric-field terms appear in the fourth row and column
rather than in the first row and column as in the previous versions.
The reason for this difference is that Shadowitz writes four-vectors with
the time component in the last position (after the spatial components)
rather than in the first position. Additionally, the EM field tensor pre-
sented by Shadowitz is essentially c times the EM field tensor in SGVT,
so Ex /c in SGVT becomes Ex in Shadowitz, and Bx in SGVT becomes
cBx in Shadowitz.
To compensate for this difference when deriving Maxwell’s
p Equations
from the EM field tensor, Shadowitz includes a factor of µ0 /0 in front
of his four-current (J) term:
r
∂Fij µ0
= Ji
∂xj 0
so if you pull the multiplicative factor of c out of Shadowitz’s EM tensor
and divide it into the four-current term, this becomes
r r
1 µ0 √ µ0
Ji = µ0 0 Ji
c 0 0
s
µ20 0
= Ji = µ0 Ji
0
√
where the fact that c = 1/ µ0 0 has been used, making the final ex-
pression consistent with the four-current term in SGVT.
References
Griffiths, D., Introduction to Electrodynamics, Benjamin-Cummings 1999.
Jackson, J.D., Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley 1999.
Shadowitz, A., The Electromagnetic Field, McGraw-Hill 1975.

1 EM Tensor Comparison: X y Z X Z y y Z X Z y X

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 EM Tensor Comparison: X y Z X Z y y Z X Z y X

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 EM Tensor Comparison: X y Z X Z y y Z X Z y X

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

This document compares the electromagnetic field tensor presented in A

−Ex /c −Ey /c −Ez /c

In Jackson’s Classical Electrodynamics, the doubly contravariant EM

In Shadowitz’s The Electromagnetic Field, the doubly contravariant EM

Griffiths, D., Introduction to Electrodynamics, Benjamin-Cummings 1999.

Jackson, J.D., Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley 1999.

Shadowitz, A., The Electromagnetic Field, McGraw-Hill 1975.

You might also like