E Learning Deaf People
E Learning Deaf People
E Learning Deaf People
net/publication/4204715
CITATIONS READS
32 2,257
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Intelligence, Emotional Intelligence, Consciousness, Metacognition, Giftedness. Theories, Models, Technologies. View project
Patient-Centric ICTs based Healthcare for children with learning, physical and/or sensory disabilities View project
All content following this page was uploaded by John Vrettaros on 05 June 2014.
Abstract – This paper presents a Learning System (LS) possible for a student with ‘less’ measured hearing to actually
which offers Greek Sign Language videos in be able to understand what is being said better than another
correspondence to every text in the learning environment. student who has ‘more’ measured hearing. Hearing disability
The system is designed notably for deaf adults for the can change over time, and can also involve tinnitus (‘hearing
purpose of their lifelong vocational and educational ‘internally generated’ sounds) or additional disabilities [1]
training. In the LS, the special needs of Deaf learners are (e.g. visual).
satisfied, e.g. bilingual information (text and sign GSL [4] is a natural visual language used by the members
language), high level of visualization, interactive and of the Greek Deaf Community with several thousands of
explorative learning, and the potential of learning in peer native or non-native signers. Research on the grammar of GSL
groups via video conferencing. In this environment, for the per se is limited; some work has been done on individual
first time, Greek signers are able to learn in their own aspects of its syntax negation [11], morphology [12], as well
language, the sign language. In addressing the above as on applied and educational linguistics including comparison
context, the LS is adapted to the specific learning problems with spoken language [15]. It is assumed that GSL as we now
of the target group, i.e. deaf adolescents and young adults. know it is a combination of the older type of Greek sign
The provided content is bilingual. Bilingual experiments language dialects with French sign language influence [13, 14,
(spoken and signed language) in schools of the deaf and 15].
hearing impaired have shown that the use of sign language This paper presents a learning system (LS) which offers
in the classroom enhance reading competence significantly. Greek Sign Language videos in correspondence to every text
The basic objective of the present e-learning environment in the learning environment. The system is designed notably
is the support of the equal rights of Deaf people for their for deaf adults for the purpose of their lifelong vocational and
access and real attendance in the vocational and educational training. In the LS, the special needs of deaf
educational training. The development of LS and this learners are satisfied, as e.g. bilingual information (text and
paper has been supported by Leonardo Da Vinci sign language), high level of visualization, interactive and
Framework Program, “DELFE” project, of European explorative learning, and the possibility of learning in peer
Union. groups via video conferencing. In this environment, for the
first time, Greek signers are able to learn in their own
Index Terms – e-learning, sign language, video, e-content, language, the sign language.
vocational training, deaf people.
OTHER PROJECTS AND STANDARDS
UNDERSTANDING THE NEEDS OF E-STUDENTS
WITH HEARING DISABILITY At the web site of World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) we
drew useful information that has to do with the creation of
During the last ten years a tremendous application of ICT and accessible html pages for the Deaf and hard hearing persons.
e-content has been remarked on the European VET sector For any time-based multimedia presentation, synchronize
(Vocational and Educational Training). A variety of target equivalent alternatives with the presentation. A time-based
groups, that were facing inclusion problems in the labour presentation can include any form of multimedia, such as a
market, have set the motivation for the realization of projects movie, animation or slide show. Equivalent alternatives to
and strategies aiming at the rehabilitation of the certain these types of presentations are captions (which provide
population. This context has been mainly addressed by actions access to audio tracks) and audio descriptions (which provide
of e-learning and e-content development. However, few of the access to visual tracks). They have already explained the need
above actions have been devoted to the learning and inclusions to provide a textual transcript for any audio track or video
problems Deaf people are facing. track, and a textual description of the video track. However, it
It is important to note that every student has his or her must be admitted that a text transcript alone is not the ideal
own individual needs. Although it is possible to ‘measure’ and method for providing an equitable experience for persons with
describe a person’s hearing ability in a variety of ways, disabilities. It is widely accepted that on-screen captioning
understanding speech is a very complex process that can allows Deaf and hard-of-hearing people to more fully
involve the eyes as well as ears and brain. It is therefore appreciate the experience of a movie or multimedia
1
Dr. Drigas Athanasios, Coordinator of Net Media Lab, NCSR Demorktos, dr@imm.demokritos.gr
2
Mr Kouremenos Dimitris, Computer Engineering M.Sc., Net Media Lab, NCSR Demokritos, dkourem@imm.demokritos.gr
3
Mr Kouremenos Stylianos, Computer Engineering, Net Media Lab, NCSR Demokritos & Technical University of Athens, skourem@imm.demokritos.gr
4
Mr John Vrettaros, Project Manager, Net Media Lab, NCSR Demokritos, jvr@imm.demokritos.gr
0-7803-9141-1/05/$20.00 © 2005 IEEE July 7 – 9, 2005, Juan Dolio, Dominican Republic
ITHET 6th Annual International Conference
T1A-1
ITHET 6th Annual International Conference, July 7 - 9, 2005, Juan Dolio, Dominican Republic, TC2-17Session T1A
production. A separate textual transcript that must be read In addressing the above context, the LMS is adapted to
after the fact does not provide an equivalent experience [2]. the specific learning problems of the target group, i.e. deaf
The Access Board is an independent U.S. Federal Agency adolescents and young adults. The provided content is
charged with developing accessibility requirements and bilingual. Bilingual experiments (spoken and signed language)
guidelines, assisting in the implementation of accessible in schools of the deaf and hearing impaired have shown that
solutions, and enforcing accessibility standards for federally the use of sign language in the classroom furthers reading
funded facilities. In 1998, Congress amended the competence significantly. The basic objective of the present e-
Rehabilitation Act to include Section 508, requiring all U.S. learning environment is the support of the equal rights of Deaf
Federal Agencies to make their electronic information people for their access and real attendance in the vocational
accessible to people with disabilities. Compliance with the and educational training.
requirements set out by the Access Board in Section 508 is The above context is further verified by a requirements’
usually referred to as "ADA Compliant." analysis study performed in the DELFE project [8]. For the
At this point, it must be noted that the presented e- purpose of this study, we wrote a questionnaire concerning the
learning system, namely DELFE [8], is compliant to the familiarization of the Deaf students with the new technologies
Section 508 [3] for technology-related programs and activities. and their possible technological knowledge. The title of the
questionnaire was ‘‘the diagnosis of educational needs of the
USERS’ REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS hearing impaired on the new technologies’’. In the paragraph
The Greek Sign Language (GSL) is a natural visual language to follow, we present some statistical results that were derived
used by the members of the Greek Deaf Community with from a certain question (see Table 1, figure 1). The question
several thousands of native or non-native signers. According was the following: ‘‘would you like to have more friendly
to the Office for the Disabled people in Greece there are Information in Internet? Please describe how you would like
100000 people with special needs in Greece. About 10000 of it?’’
them are Deaf and hard of hearing. Unfortunately, the
TABLE 1
statistics show that the unemployment increasing rate of the STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR THE DEAF PEOPLE
disabled people in Greece are three to four times higher than
the corresponding rate of the remaining population. Two main
Not at all A bit A lot Uninterested
reasons can be identified for these special employment 14 19 15 1
conditions: One, an inadequate estimate of the performance Text
3 8 37 1
abilities of the deaf, and, secondly, the communicative More pictures and
problems between deaf and hearing colleagues [4, 5]. Animation
The internet has proven to be a boon for people with Sign Language 1 9 31 8
disabilities. But just as it is important to design buildings with 1 6 39 3
Sign Language and
accessibility in mind, the same is true for the internet.
Text
Flexibility is the key to accessibility. It's important to keep in
mind that people will be using a variety of technologies to E-MATERIAL FOR DEAF
access your home page. Keeping your page accessible mean
keeping such options open. In an age of intelligent Sign Language and Text
Sign Language
HTTP/WWW servers that can query clients about their
More pictures and Animation
feature-lists [6]. Text
The choice of the technical advanced video in the e-
learning system plays an important role. Video technologies
offer great possibilities for better telecommunication between
Deaf Students
For the video clip we took into account certain criteria for
the quality of video, like CIF video format and the speed of
128-384Kbps. In this case the details in motion can be
reproduced so that fingers, eyes and mouth are distinguishable
even for signs consisting of both hands and arms moving with
all fingers displayed.
Finally, we present the student tools of the system where
all the included features can be seen.
The system provides the following features that are
properly adapted to the users’ special requirements:
• Search: tool of content retrieval according to search FIGURE 3
keywords.
• Site map: a map of the site links and structure.
1.1 User Level
• Glossary: a glossary with the main terms of ICT in Sign
Language. There are three user levels in the system, namely, teacher,
• Content extraction: tool of content extraction for further student and administrator.
study at home. 1.2 Teacher
• My tracker: a tracker of the statistics of the student
activities in each course. This tool helps the teacher track • The teacher is provided the ability of announcing the new
the student progress. course via e-mail (electronic post), or via web bulletin
• My tests & Surveys: Evaluation of the student’s board (newsgroup - team of discussions).
progress via asynchronous tests from the teacher. • Moreover, the teacher is able of escaping from the frames
of the course and via special link to browse additional
The system gives the choice of selecting the speed of the material for better and more thorough understanding.
video depending on the line capacity allocated to the student. • He/she has also the ability of separating the class in
This is performed through the selection of the quality of smaller teams at the duration of the course for the
graphics and video. The system also allows the off-line realisation of small work and then of linking the class.
downloading of the Sign language content for better real time He/she can pose tests or questions of consolidation and
quality. assign homework.
Now, we may turn our discussion to the e-learning models • Finally, the teacher may answer and announce the
supported by our system. The system is based on questions of the students via asynchronous means of
asynchronous surveillance of the educational process and communication (web bulletin board, e-mail, chat).
synchronous communication through chat. In the paragraphs
to follow, we present the users of the system and some usage
[2] Chuck, L. & Geoff, F., “Techniques for Web Content Accessibility [9] Kouremenos, S. & Kouremenos, D. & Domoxoudis, S. & Drigas,
Guidelines 1.0”, W3C Note 6, 11-2000, A., “Statistical Analysis of Sign Language Videoconference
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT-TECHS. Traffic in Multipoint Sessions over IP”, The 4th Conference on
VideoConference and Emerging Technologies, Gallaudet
[3] 508 Law (29 U.S.C.,794d), Ҥ1194.22 Web-based intranet and University, Washington D.C., April 18-20, 2004.
internet information and applications”, Congress amended the
Rehabilitation Act to require Federal agencies, 1998, [10] Katsogiannou, M., “The Greek Sign Language, another way of
http://www.section508.gov/. communication”, Translatum Journal and the Author, 2002.
[4] Antzakas, K. & Woll, B., “Head Movements and Negation in [11] Lampropoulou, V., “Meeting the needs of deaf children in Greece.
Greek Sign Language”, Gesture Workshop, City University of A systematic approach”, Journal of the British Association of
London, 2001, 193--196. Teachers of the Deaf, 1992, 33--34.
[5] Kyle, J. G. & Woll, B., “Sign Language: the study of deaf people [12] Lampropoulou, V., “Beginning the research of Greek Sign
and their language”, Cambridge University Press, 1985. Language”, Athens XII World Congress of the World Federation of
the Deaf. Vienna, Austria, 6 - 15 July 1995.
[6] Dr Drigas, A. & Vrettaros, I. & Kouremenos, D., “Teleeducation
and e-learning services for teaching English as a second language [13] Bellugi, U. & Fischer, S. “A comparison of Sign language and
to Deaf people, whose first language is the Sign Language”, spoken language”, Cognition, 1972, 1, 173—200.
WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications,
[14] Kyle, J. G. & Woll, B., “Sign Language: the study of deaf people
Issue 3, Volume 1, September 2004.
and their language”, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[7] Gunnar, H., “Quality Measurement on Video Communication for
[15] Karen, N., “Creating Accessible HTML”,
Sign Language”, 1997,
http://www.deaflibrary.org/accessibility.html.
http://www.omnitor.se/textversion/english/qualityonvideo.html.
FIGURE 2