Qcs Ep MT 01 Rev05 Aytb

Praise the Lord!!! Halleluiah!!! Glory to God, King of Kings, Prince of Peace!!!!
ENGINEERING PROCEDURE
QCS / EP / MT – 01.
Revision : 05
ENGINEERING PROCEDURE FOR

MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION
Date of Issue : 20th November, 2011

Date of Revision-01 : 27th December 2011
Date of Revision-02 : 25th December 2013
Date of Revision-03 : 30th March 2015
Date of Revision-04 : 13th September 2015
Date of Revision-05 : 28th July 2018
Total Pages: 15 (Fifteen)

Page: 1of 15.
Approved By:
ASNT NDT Level III
NESAN CHARLES
ASNT # 2000696
QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

QCS/EP/MT-01.
Issue Date 28th July 2018

ENGINEERING PROCEDURE FOR MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION Revision 05
Page 2 of 15
REVISION SUMMARY:
Rev. Para No. Page Changes

No No.
Added “ verifying System performance and sensitivity of
1 8 13
wet & dry particles”
Figure 1 & Added Figure 1 & 2 Figure of System performance test
1 14
Figure 2 plate and magnetic strip respectively.
ASME B31.1 updated to 2012 Version.
2 3 4 ASME B31.3 updated to 2010 Version.
API 1104 updated to 2010 Version.
3 General all Removed the client and project name
4 3 4 Updated Edition Version
5 2.0 4 Updated Edition Version
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:
ASNT NDT Level – III # 200696 Signature

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 3 of 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. Scope ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4
2. Technique .................................................................................................................................................................... 4
3. Reference .................................................................................................................................................................... 4
4. Personnel ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4
5. Safety ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4
6. Equipment and material ...................................................................................................................................... 5
7. Lighting ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5
8. Surface Preparation ............................................................................................................................................... 7
9. General Requirement ............................................................................................................................................ 7
10. Demagnetization ...................................................................................................................................................... 8
11. Post Cleaning ............................................................................................................................................................. 9
12. Interpretation and Evaluation........................................................................................................................... 9
13. Acceptance Standard ............................................................................................................................................ 9
14. Documentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 10
Table – 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Attachment 1............................................................................................................................................................................ 11
Figure-1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure-2 ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Exhibit – 1 Report Format ................................................................................................................................................. 15
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 4 of 15
1.0. SCOPE:
This procedure gives details required for the Magnetic Particle Examination of weld joints
and components conducted in accordance with requirements of referenced codes and
standard.
2.0. TECHNIQUE:
Detailed, written, MT examination procedures of Attachments 1 shall be used during all
examinations.
3.0. REFERENCES:
ASME Section V – 2017 Edition

ASME Section VIII -2017 Edition.
ASME B31.1 - 2016 Edition.
ASME B31.3 - 2016 Edition.
ASTM – E709 Standard guide for magnetic particle Testing.
ASTM 1444 Standard Practice for magnetic particle Testing.
SAEP 1144 – Magnetic Particle Examination
SAEP 1142 – Qualification of Non-Saudi Aramco NDT Personnel 2014 Edition
API- 1104 Addendum 2014
AWS D1.1 2015 23rd Edition
4.0. PERSONNEL:
All personnel performing Magnetic Particle Testing or evaluation of results, shall be

qualified and certified as minimum MT Level-II as per written practice of Quality Control
Services complying with ANSI/ASNT CP - 189 edition 2011
5.0. SAFETY:
The inspector shall be responsible for compliance with applicable safety rules in handling
and usage of magnetic particle materials and equipment. A hot work permit shall be
obtained as necessary.
Adequate ventilation shall be provided when performing an MT examination in confined
areas to prevent inhalation of harmful materials.
Prolong skin contact with the petroleum distillate shall be avoided.
Flammable inspection materials shall be kept away from open flame and sparks.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:
Praise Praise
the Lord!!! Halleluiah!!!
the Lord!!! Glory to
Halleluiah!!! God,toKing
Glory God,ofKing
Kings, Prince Prince
of Kings, of Peace!!!!
of Peace!!!!

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 5 of 15
6.0. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS:

Electromagnetic Yoke: Yokes shall be AC/DC and capable of lifting 10 lbs in AC mode and
40 lbs in DC modes at the maximum pole spacing that will be used. The Yoke must be used
in the AC mode, unless otherwise stated.
- Black Lights
- UV light Meter.
Dry magnetic powders, wet magnetic particles, contrast paint and cleaning solvents shall
be of given make or equivalent:
- Magnaflux, Ardrox, Sherwin, Parker
Where the background contrast is required to be enhanced white contrast paint in spray
cans of the given make or equivalent shall be used.
- Magnaflux, Ardrox, Sherwin, Parker
All equipment and consumables to be used shall be from Saudi ARAMCO approved list.
7.0 LIGHTING:
7.1 The minimum light intensity at the examination surface/Site shall be 1076 lux
(100ftc).
7.2 Fluorescent MT examinations performed in the field require a minimum ultraviolet
light intensity of 3000 µW/cm² at the examination surface, or 1000 µW/cm ² in a
darkened area (ambient white light intensity is 22 lx (2 ftc) or less).
7.3 Ultraviolet (UV) and white light intensities shall be measured at the examination
surface and recorded prior to performing an MT examination. Details of UV light
utilization and equipment requirements are as given below:
7.3.1 Examinations requiring the use of ultraviolet light shall be conducted in a
darkened area of 22 lux (lx) [2 foot candles (ftc)] or less of white light
intensity as measured at the surface to be tested. Every attempt shall be
made to darken the area as much as possible prior to conducting a
fluorescent magnetic particle examination through the use of a blanket,
hood, or portable booth.
7.3.2 The ultraviolet light intensity at the examination surface shall be measured
- At least every 4 hours.
- Whenever the work location is changed.
- After changing a component of the unit such as a filter or Bulb

7.3.3 The Light intensity shall be checked with Calibrated Light meter.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 6 of 15
Table - 1
Ultraviolet (UV) Light Intensity Log
UV LIGHT MFG: _________________ UV LIGHT MODEL #:_______________________

UV LIGHT S/N:___________________
Date Intensity@15 Inches Location Time Technician Remark:

(µW/cm²) Name:
NOTE:
It shall be mentioned in the remark of the table-1 if the density has taken due to either after
changing a component of the unit (such as a filter or bulb) or a UV light unit failure.
7.4 Light Intensity:

7.4.1 The ultraviolet light intensity shall be determined using a UVP Model J-221
Long Wave UV Meter, Spectroline DSE-100X, DME-365, or equivalent. The
light meters shall be calibrated every 6 months and bear an authentic seal
which presents the date calibration was accomplished and the next due
date.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 7 of 15
7.4.2 A minimum of 3000 µW/cm² is required for field inspections in areas of

ambient white light which exceed 2 ftc as measured at the examination
surface. A minimum value of 1000 µW/cm² is required for work in a
darkened area of 2 ftc or less.
7.4.3 Ultraviolet light intensity shall be measured at the examination surface
prior to the fluorescent MT examination. The light sensor shall be placed
on the surface to be tested. The black light should be centered
perpendicular (90°) to the light sensor at a distance of 15 inches (38.1
cm). The light should be maneuvered in such a manner as to monitor the
light meter and achieve the highest intensity reading.
8.0 SURFACE PREPARATION:

8.1 All surfaces to be examined and any adjacent area within 1 inch (25.4 mm) of the
examination area shall be free of rust, scale, slag, sand, grease, paint (contrast paint
is acceptable), oily films, or other interfering conditions. Part surface temperature
shall not exceed 600°F (316°C) when using dry particles or 122°F (50°C) when using
wet particles.
8.2 As cast, as rolled, as forged, or as welded surfaces are satisfactory if clean and the
weld blends smoothly into the base metal without undercutting. Unusually rough or
non-uniform examination surfaces which would interfere with the formation and/or
interpretation of indications shall be properly conditioned prior to examination.
Conditioning may be in the form of wire brushing, sanding, or other approved
methods that will not smear or otherwise mask discontinuities of interest.
8.3 MT examinations performed on thin (a maximum of 0.002 inch [0.05 mm] thick),
smooth, nonconductive, and/or nonmagnetic coatings, such as paint or corrosion
inhibitor coatings, are allowable provided the applied magnetic field at the
examination surface is verified as sufficient with a magnetic field indicator. Coatings
should be completely removed from all points where electrical contact is made.
8.4 Areas where electrical contact will be made on the examination piece shall be
thoroughly cleaned to provide low resistance electrical connections to reduce the
possibility of arc strikes.
9.0 General Requirements

9.1 The recommended examination methods and techniques described in the following
paragraphs apply to all MT methods.
9.2 The temperature shall not exceed 600°F (316°C) for dry particles or 122°F (50°C)
for wet particles.
9.3 Ensure, that the light intensity is adequate to perform the examination.
9.4 Clean the examination surface and adjacent area within 3 inches (76.2 mm) of the
examination area.
9.5 A visual inspection of the examination surface shall be performed prior to
magnetization to verify the surface cleaning operation was thorough and complete,
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 8 of 15
to identify gross discontinuities, and to identify areas of interest where an indication

will be expected to occur. Prior to performing a fluorescent MT examination, the
examination surface should be scanned with UV light to assure that all contaminants
have been removed.
9.6 The surface to be tested and 1 inch (25.4 mm) of adjacent area shall be examined
for evidence of particle accumulations unless otherwise specified. Indications shall
be interpreted to determine the cause of the accumulation and the indication size
evaluated to the appropriate acceptance criteria. The surface to be tested shall be
examined in suitable increments. Adjacent examination areas shall overlap a
minimum of 10%.
9.7 Two (2) separate examinations shall be carried out on each area to be tested. The
second examination shall be with the lines of flux perpendicular (90°) to those
used for the first examination in that area. A different method of magnetization
may be used for the second examination. When possible, a circular magnetization
shall be followed with longitudinal magnetization.
9.8 The method of MT examination selected for use shall provide an applied magnetic
field having sufficient strength to produce satisfactory indications but not strong
enough to cause masking of indications.
9.9 After a defect is thought to have been removed and prior to making weld repairs,
the area shall be reexamined by MT or any suitable NDT method to assure the
defect has been eliminated or reduced to an acceptable size.
9.10 AC yokes shall be tested for adequate magnetization strength prior to use each day
by being able to pick up a 10 lb. steel weight. Similarly, DC yokes shall be tested
using a 40 lb. steel weight.
9.11 Where magnetization field strength is uncertain, an ASME pie guage or Burmah
castrol strip may be used to verify adequate magnetization of a part.
10 DEMAGNETISATION:
10.1 When the presence of residual magnetism within the piece could interfere with
subsequent processing or usage, the piece shall be demagnetized. Residual
magnetism shall not exceed ±2 gauss. Demagnetization shall always be
performed on parts, which are to be welded after an MT examination has been
performed to prevent arc blow.
10.2 The presence or absence of residual magnetism shall be demonstrated and verified
using a calibrated Gaussmeter, Magnetic Field Meter, or a Hall Effect Probe
Gaussmeter and recorded on the MT Inspection Report form.
10.3 Demagnetization shall be accomplished using yoke method.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 9 of 15
11.0 POST CLEANING:

11.1 Following each MT examination, the part being examined shall be cleaned to
remove all residual magnetic particle materials. Any method that will remove all
residual MT materials from the part surface and does not harm the part is
considered acceptable.
11.2 A visual examination of the part being examined shall be performed at the
conclusion of the post-cleaning operation to assure that the cleaning was thorough
and complete, all residual magnetic particle examination materials have been
removed, and that the part was not damaged in any way.
11.3 If wet fluorescent MT examination was performed, the part shall be scanned with
the blacklight to assure that post-cleaning was adequate.
12.0 INTERPRETATION AND EVALUATION:

All indications shall be interpreted and evaluated in accordance with the appropriate
acceptance criteria after each individual examination and the results recorded on the MT
Examination Report Form MT-01 . Exhibt-1
13.0 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS:
13.1. Acceptance criteria for API STD 570, API STD 620, API STD 650, and API
STD 653 are in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Division 1.
13.2. Acceptance Criteria for ASME B31.4 and B31.8 are in accordance with API
STD 1104.
Acceptance criteria for examinations performed to ASME B31.1; ANSI/ASME B31.3;
ASME Section VIII, Division 1; API STD 1104; and AWS D1.1 are as below.
Acceptance Criteria
1. ANSI/ASME B31.1 Power Piping
The following relevant indications are unacceptable:
1.1 Any cracks or linear indications.
1.2 Rounded indications with dimensions greater than 3/16 inch (4.8mm).
1.3 Four or more rounded indications in a line separated by 1/16 inch (1.6
mm) or less edge to edge.1.4 Ten or more rounded indications in any 6 square
inches (3,870 mm²) of surface with the major dimension of this area not to exceed
6inches (150 mm) with the area taken in the most unfavorable location relative to
the indications being evaluated.
2. ASME B31.3 Chemical Plant and Refinery Piping
Any cracks or linear indications are unacceptable.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 10 of 15
3. ASME Section VIII, Division 1

3.1 Indications with any major dimension greater than 1/16 inch
(1.6 mm) shall be considered relevant. All surfaces to be
examined shall be free of:
3.2 Relevant linear indications
3.2.1 Relevant rounded indications greater than 3/16 inch (4.8 mm).
3.2.2 Four or more rounded defects in a line separated by 1/16 inch (1.6
mm) or less (edge to edge) except where the specification for the material
establishes different requirements for acceptance so far as defects are concerned.
4. API STD 1104 Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities

Any indication with a dimension greater than 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) shall be
considered relevant. Relevant indications shall be unacceptable when any of the
following conditions exist:
4.1 Linear indications evaluated as crater cracks or star cracks which
exceed 5/32 inch (3.96 mm) in length.
4.2 Linear indications evaluated as cracks other than crater cracks or
star cracks.
4.3 Linear indications evaluated as incomplete fusion (IF) and exceed
1 inch (25.4 mm) in total length in a continuous 12 inch (304.8
mm) length of weld or 8% of the weld length.
4.4 Individual or scattered porosity (P) shall be unacceptable when
any of the following conditions exists:
4.5 The size of an individual pore exceeds 1/8 inch (3.17 mm) or 25%
of the thinner of the nominal wall thicknesses joined.
4.6 Cluster porosity (CP) in any pass except the finish pass shall be
unacceptable when any of the following conditions exist:
4.7 An individual pore within a cluster exceeds 1/16 inch
(1.6 mm).
4.8 The CP diameter exceeds ½ inch (12.7 mm).
4.9 The aggregate length of CP in a continuous 12 inch (304.8 mm)

length of weld exceeds ½ inch (12.7 mm).
14.0 DOCUMENTATION
Results of the examination shall be recorded in the Report Format Form MT-01 Exhibit-1.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 11 of 15
Attachment 1
Electromagnetic Yoke Technique

1. Scope
1.1 This procedure covers the use of an Alternating Current (AC) yoke for the
examination of ferrous materials for surface indications using wet or dry
particles and the continuous method.
1.2 This method shall only be used to detect surface discontinuities using AC
current. Half Wave Direct Current (HWDC) may be used for verification of
discontinuities and special applications. Unless otherwise specified, the
current control on the yoke shall be set at maximum.
1.3 The prod technique should not be used on highly polished or machined
surfaces due the possibility of arc damage to the surface.
2. Equipment
Magnetization is to be performed using a Electromagnetic Yoke that shall
demonstrate adequate magnetization force by being able to lift a 10 lb. weight for
AC and 40 lbs. for DC.
Dry powder shall be chosen to provide the greatest contrast between the powder
and the background. It is recommended to apply a light application of white paint
before application of the wet visible technique.
3. Procedure
3.1 The yoke shall be placed in contact with the surface to be examined and
energized.
3.2 While maintaining the magnetic field, apply the magnetic particles so that
a light, uniform coating settles on the examination surface.
3.3 For the dry technique, while maintaining the magnetic field, remove the
excess particles by using a low air pressure air stream from a hand
actuated rubber bulb. For the wet technique, allow the solution to drain
from the part while maintaining the magnetic field.
3.4 Observe the particle formation during application and excess particle
removal.
3.5 For the wet fluorescent technique, the black light shall be warmed up for 5
minutes prior to the examination and external visible light shall be
excluded from the examination area.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 12 of 15
4. Direction of Magnetization
4.1 Two separate examinations shall be carried out on each area. The yoke
shall be placed so the magnetic field during the second examination is
approximately perpendicular (90°) to the field of the first examination
forming an "X" pattern. The legs of the yoke shall be positioned for
maximum contact with the surface being tested.
4.2 For welds on flat surfaces, the yoke shall be placed across the weld at an
angle of 30°-45° from the long axis of the weld. The second examination
shall be perpendicular to the first.
4.3 For examining circumferential (pipe) and fillet welds, the yoke shall be
initially positioned so the legs straddle the weld or the area of interest and
the applied field is perpendicular to the long axis of the weld. For the
second examination, the yoke legs shall be positioned parallel to the long
axis of the weld, on the crown of the weld or immediately beside the weld.
Caution shall be exercised when performing successive shots to note the
position of the legs (poles) on the previous shot. Assure the area of the
established field sufficiently overlaps the area of the previous field,
especially at the pole positions of the previous field.
5. Examination Coverage
5.1 Yoke leg spacing shall be between a minimum of 3 inches (76.2 mm) and
a maximum of 8 inches (203.2 mm). Shorter spacing may be used to
compensate for the geometry of the area being examined or to increase
sensitivity, but leg spacing less than 3 inches (76.2 mm) is not
recommended due to the strength of the longitudinal magnetic field at the
poles.
5.2 The area to be examined shall be limited to a maximum distance of one-

fourth (¼) of the spacing on either side of a centerline joining the two
yoke poles.
6 Inspection
The surface to be tested and 1 inch (25.4 mm) of additional adjacent area shall be
examined for evidence of particle accumulations. Interpret and evaluate all
indications to the appropriate acceptance criteria after each examination. Record
all pertinent information on the MT report. Attach a sketch of the area examined
and all permanent records.
7. Post Examination Cleaning
Remove all residual magnetic particle materials from the part examined. Perform a
visual inspection to assure the post cleaning operation was thorough and complete
and the part was not damaged.
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 13 of 15
8.0 Verifying System Performance and sensitivity of dry and wet magnetic particles:
A practical way to evaluate the performance and sensitivity of the dry or wet magnetic
particles or overall system performance, or both, is to use representative test parts with
known discontinuities of the type and severity normally encountered during actual
production inspection. This system performance verify and sensitivity test are not required
to the materials that are not recovered or reused, or both, such as material packaged in
aerosol containers.
8.1 Verifying System Performance:

A magnetic particle system performance test plate, such as shown in Fig. 1
is useful for testing the overall performance of wet or dry techniques using yokes.
Recommended minimum dimensions are ten inches per side and nominal thickness
of one inch .The check shall be performed by finding the number of notches with
the un-used samples and shall be recorded. If used sample gives less number of
notches than the un- used sample, then the in –use material will be unacceptable.
The unacceptable used material shall be discarded.
Parts used for verification will be demagnetized, cleaned thoroughly
following the examination, and checked under black or visible light, as appropriate
to the examination process, to ensure that residual indications do not remain. It
shall be verified on starting of each day of the work.
8.2 Sensitivity of the Particles:

The sensitivity of the particles shall be verified in starting of each day
shift. The magnetically encoded pattern in magnetic stripes (Fig 2), can
serve as a tool to evaluate magnetic particle inspection materials. Particles
are attracted to the magnetic gradients formed in the stripe when the
stripe has been magnetically encoded with a pattern of flux reversals. The
encoding of the stripe can be controlled to provide gradients of varying
magnitude. Particles can be evaluated for sensitivity when observed to see
how small a gradient can generate a particle indication.
8.2.1 Wet Method Materials:

Wet method materials may be poured, sprayed or otherwise
applied to the stripe, as they would be used for MPI. Excess bath
shall be allowed to flow away from the stripe. The stripe shall be
observed under suitable illumination for the formation of particle
indications. Observations shall be noted as to the quantity of
particle indications and the clarity thereof.
8.2.2 Dry Method Materials:

Dry method materials shall be poured, dusted, blown or
otherwise applied to the stripe, as they would be used for MPI.
Excess powder shall be removed with a gentle blowing action. The
stripe shall be observed under suitable illumination for the
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 14 of 15
formation of particle indications. Observations shall be noted as to

the quantity of particle indications and the clarity thereof.
Figure 1: MAGNETIC PARTICLE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TEST PLATE
Figure :2 MAGNETIC STRIPE
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

QCS/EP/MT-01.

Page 15 of 15
Exhibit – 1. FORM MT -01

Date: Request No.:
MAGNETIC PARTICLE TEST REPORT
Client: Location: Project/J.O. No.: Surface
Temperature:
Procedure: Reference Code: Calibration: Surface
10Lb 40Lb Condition:
MT Yoke Mg. S/N Method Particle Light Intensity Material Mg Batch
AC White Light: White
Visible Contrast
HWDC Wet
FWDC Black Light:
Fluorescent Particle
Dry Attached:
Light meter NA:
SR Drawing/ Equipment / Line Weld W.S Dia. Defect Details and Result Remark
# ISO Reference No Thick location Accept/
Reject
Number
Sketch:
Signature: ______________ ______________ __________________ ___________________
Name : ____________ _______________ ________________ _______________

MT Technician Interpreted By Reviewed / Verified By Approved By
NESAN CHARLES
Approved by:

Qcs Ep MT 01 Rev05 Aytb

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Qcs Ep MT 01 Rev05 Aytb

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Qcs Ep MT 01 Rev05 Aytb

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Praise the Lord!!! Halleluiah!!! Glory to God, King of Kings, Prince of Peace!!!!

ENGINEERING PROCEDURE FOR

Date of Issue : 20th November, 2011

Total Pages: 15 (Fifteen)

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

Rev. Para No. Page Changes

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

ASME Section V – 2017 Edition

All personnel performing Magnetic Particle Testing or evaluation of results, shall be

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

6.0. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS:

- After changing a component of the unit such as a filter or Bulb

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

UV LIGHT MFG: _________________ UV LIGHT MODEL #:_______________________

Date Intensity@15 Inches Location Time Technician Remark:

7.4 Light Intensity:

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

7.4.2 A minimum of 3000 µW/cm² is required for field inspections in areas of

8.0 SURFACE PREPARATION:

9.0 General Requirements

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

to identify gross discontinuities, and to identify areas of interest where an indication

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

11.0 POST CLEANING:

12.0 INTERPRETATION AND EVALUATION:

13.0 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS:

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

3. ASME Section VIII, Division 1

3.2 Relevant linear indications

4. API STD 1104 Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities

4.9 The aggregate length of CP in a continuous 12 inch (304.8 mm)

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

Electromagnetic Yoke Technique

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

5.2 The area to be examined shall be limited to a maximum distance of one-

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

8.1 Verifying System Performance:

8.2 Sensitivity of the Particles:

8.2.1 Wet Method Materials:

8.2.2 Dry Method Materials:

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

Issue Date 28th July 2018

formation of particle indications. Observations shall be noted as to

Figure 1: MAGNETIC PARTICLE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TEST PLATE

Figure :2 MAGNETIC STRIPE

QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES Procedure Control No.

UV LIGHT MFG: _ UV LIGHT MODEL #:_______

Signature: _____

Name : ____ _ _____