This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on urban transport planning and modal split analysis. [1] It discusses how the choice-abstract theory models people's perceptions of transportation options in terms of attributes. [2] It explains how trip-related variables and travelers' economic characteristics can be incorporated into utility functions. [3] The document provides an example of applying the logit model to estimate the market share and revenues for different transportation modes.
This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on urban transport planning and modal split analysis. [1] It discusses how the choice-abstract theory models people's perceptions of transportation options in terms of attributes. [2] It explains how trip-related variables and travelers' economic characteristics can be incorporated into utility functions. [3] The document provides an example of applying the logit model to estimate the market share and revenues for different transportation modes.
This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on urban transport planning and modal split analysis. [1] It discusses how the choice-abstract theory models people's perceptions of transportation options in terms of attributes. [2] It explains how trip-related variables and travelers' economic characteristics can be incorporated into utility functions. [3] The document provides an example of applying the logit model to estimate the market share and revenues for different transportation modes.
This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on urban transport planning and modal split analysis. [1] It discusses how the choice-abstract theory models people's perceptions of transportation options in terms of attributes. [2] It explains how trip-related variables and travelers' economic characteristics can be incorporated into utility functions. [3] The document provides an example of applying the logit model to estimate the market share and revenues for different transportation modes.
the hypothesis that when making choices, people perceive goods and services indirectly in terms of their attributes, each of which is weighted identically across choices. How are the constant terms in the utility functions, which are meant to capture the effect of variables that are not explicitly included in the model, weighted across modes in attribute specific approach ?
This is done by utilizing any of the modes in the
choice set as the base mode. How to incorporate trip related attributes, that changes the utility of modes, in attribute-specific utility functions ?
By Dummy or Binary-variable technique.
How to incorporate the variables reflecting
the economic characteristics of travellers in utility functions ?
By representing travel cost as percentage of
the income of travellers. Hence, the utility that a traveler in zone i receives when choosing alternative j can be written as, Why utility/disutility of a travel mode needs to be treated as a random quantity ?
Because, the level of utility (Service)
of a mode of travel, as perceived by travellers, varies significantly between individuals based on their personal characteristics. It has been found, based on extensive research, and considerations of simplicity in analysis and possibility of getting closed-form solution, that the Gumbel or Double Exponential distribution will be suited for fitting the random utility term . . A mode Choice situation involving two modes (1 &2), wherein 40 % of travellers make use of mode 1 can be mathematically represented as follows. Where, p(j) is the probability of choice of alternative j m is the number of alternative modes including j
The above is known as the Logit Model of mode
choice. Example1: Application of the Logit Model
A calibration study resulted in the following
utility function: The zonal trip interchange in the target-year is 5,000 person-trips per day. During the target year, trip-makers will have a choice between motorised two-wheeler (M) and city bus (B).
The target-year service attributes of the two
competing modes have been estimated to be as follows : Assuming that the calibrated mode-specific constants are 0.00 for the motorised two-wheeler (i.e., base mode) and -0.10 for the bus mode, apply the logit model to estimate the target-year market share of the two modes and the resulting fare-box revenue of the bus system. Example 2: Introduction of a New Mode It is desired to examine the effect of introducing a Rapid Transit (RT) system in the city of Example 1. A related study has projected that the service attributes of the proposed system for the trip interchanges under consideration will be
Based on professional experience, the mode-
specific constant for the new mode is estimated to be -0.06. Find the market shares of the three modes that will result from implementing the rapid-transit proposal and the effect on the revenues of the public transportation authority, which operates both the city bus and the rapid transit systems.
Solution: Assuming that the attributes of the
existing modes will not be affected by the introduction of the new mode, the utilities of the three alternatives will be Questions ?
Neues verkehrswissenschaftliches Journal - Ausgabe 16: Capacity Research in Urban Rail-Bound Transportation with Special Consideration of Mixed Traffic