Bridge Aesthetics Guide - Fred Gottemoeller
Bridge Aesthetics Guide - Fred Gottemoeller
Bridge Aesthetics Guide - Fred Gottemoeller
“Ugliness
“Uglinessisisnot
notconsciously
consciouslydesigned
designedinto
intoaa
project.
project. ItItcreeps
creepsininwhen
whendecisions
decisionsare
are
made
madewithout
withoutconsidering
consideringvisual
visual
consequences.”
consequences.”
Public
PublicAgency
AgencyOfficial
Official
Our Design Philosophy
Aesthetics
Aestheticsshouldn’t
shouldn’tbe:
be:
• •An
Anafterthought
afterthought
• •Dismissed
Dismissedas asan
aninconvenience
inconvenience
• •Intimidating
Intimidating
Aesthetics
Aestheticsshould
shouldbe:
be:
• •Integral
Integraltotothe
thedesign
designofofour
ourbridges
bridges
• •Determined
Determinedthrough
throughaacollaborative
collaborativeprocess
process
with
withall
allrelevant
relevantstakeholders
stakeholders
“Efficiency,
“Efficiency,economy
economyand
andelegance,
elegance,all
allconsidered
considered
equally”
equally”
David
DavidBillington
Billington
Bridge Aesthetics Sourcebook
Bridge Aesthetics Sourcebook
Bridge Aesthetics Sourcebook
Bridge Aesthetics Sourcebook
The Ten Determinants of Appearance
1. Horizontal and Vertical Geometry
2. Superstructure Type
3. Pier / Support Placement / Span
Arrangement
4. Abutment Placement and Height
5. Superstructure Shape
6. Pier Shape
7. Abutment Shape
8. Color
9. Texture, Ornamentation and Details
10. Lighting, Signing and Landscaping
#1 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry
• Bridge geometry is often very complex.
• Few bridges
– Are located on straight alignments
– Have flat horizontal deck surfaces
– Have supports oriented at right angles to the superstructure
– Have constant cross section widths
– Are located on a flat site
#1 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry
• Multiple variations in structure geometry may result in
visually unappealing bridges
Vertical curvature
http://www.hpcbridgeviews.com/images/colorado-
RichmondHill.jpg
#2 Superstructure Type
• Combining multiple superstructure types can result in
visual discord and a lack of integrity
• Is relatively inexpensive
• Is subjective
• Is much more complex than most
people realize
Color Options
• Practical Considerations
– Maintenance
– Lamping and Energy
– Physical Constraints
– Color Rendering
– Wildlife Concerns
– Light Pollution
Lighting – Aesthetic Considerations
• Past Workshops
IBC – June 2009, Pittsburgh, PA
TRB – January 2010, Washington, D.C.
Rutgers – April 2010, Piscataway, NJ
PENNDOT – April 2010, Harrisburg, PA
• Upcoming Workshops
IBC – June 2010, Pittsburgh, PA
TRB – January 2011, Washington, D.C.
Workshop Agenda
• Introduction
• Break
• Historic Considerations
• Design Context
• Lunch
• Design Exercise
• Break
• Closing Remarks
Design Exercise