Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    One Way Anova

    Uploaded by

    Indri widya dwi indriani
    The document contains statistical analysis comparing test scores of students in a hybrid learning group and a conventional learning group. It shows that the mean pre-test score was higher for the conventional group, but the mean post-test score was higher for the hybrid group. An ANOVA analysis found a statistically significant difference in pre-test scores between the groups but not in post-test scores. This suggests the hybrid learning approach was more effective at improving test scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    One Way Anova

    Uploaded by

    Indri widya dwi indriani
    15 views3 pages
    The document contains statistical analysis comparing test scores of students in a hybrid learning group and a conventional learning group. It shows that the mean pre-test score was higher for the conventional group, but the mean post-test score was higher for the hybrid group. An ANOVA analysis found a statistically significant difference in pre-test scores between the groups but not in post-test scores. This suggests the hybrid learning approach was more effective at improving test scores.

    Original Title

    one way anova

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains statistical analysis comparing test scores of students in a hybrid learning group and a conventional learning group. It shows that the mean pre-test score was higher for the conventional group, but the mean post-test score was higher for the hybrid group. An ANOVA analysis found a statistically significant difference in pre-test scores between the groups but not in post-test scores. This suggests the hybrid learning approach was more effective at improving test scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views3 pages

    One Way Anova

    Uploaded by

    Indri widya dwi indriani
    The document contains statistical analysis comparing test scores of students in a hybrid learning group and a conventional learning group. It shows that the mean pre-test score was higher for the conventional group, but the mean post-test score was higher for the hybrid group. An ANOVA analysis found a statistically significant difference in pre-test scores between the groups but not in post-test scores. This suggests the hybrid learning approach was more effective at improving test scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    0

    Descriptives

    POSTEST

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

    HYBRID LEARNING 15 28.07 3.011 .777 26.40 29.73 24 35

    KONVENSIONAL 15 25.13 2.924 .755 23.51 26.75 22 30

    Total 30 26.60 3.276 .598 25.38 27.82 22 35

    Test of Homogeneity of Variances

    POSTEST

    Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

    .018 1 28 .894

    ANOVA

    POSTEST

    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Between Groups 64.533 1 64.533 7.325 .011

    Within Groups 246.667 28 8.810

    Total 311.200 29

    Descriptives

    PRETEST

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

    HYBRID LEARNING 15 19.33 2.582 .667 17.90 20.76 15 24

    KONVENSIONAL 15 21.07 1.870 .483 20.03 22.10 18 24

    Total 30 20.20 2.384 .435 19.31 21.09 15 24

    Test of Homogeneity of Variances

    PRETEST

    Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

    2.939 1 28 .097
    ANOVA

    PRETEST

    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Between Groups 22.533 1 22.533 4.435 .044

    Within Groups 142.267 28 5.081

    Total 164.800 29

    Descriptives

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

    PRETEST HYBRID LEARNING 15 19.33 2.582 .667 17.90 20.76 15 24

    KONVENSIONAL 15 21.07 1.870 .483 20.03 22.10 18 24

    Total 30 20.20 2.384 .435 19.31 21.09 15 24

    POSTEST HYBRID LEARNING 15 28.07 3.011 .777 26.40 29.73 24 35

    KONVENSIONAL 15 25.13 2.924 .755 23.51 26.75 22 30

    Total 30 26.60 3.276 .598 25.38 27.82 22 35

    Test of Homogeneity of Variances

    Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

    PRETEST 2.939 1 28 .097

    POSTEST .018 1 28 .894

    ANOVA

    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    PRETEST Between Groups 22.533 1 22.533 4.435 .044

    Within Groups 142.267 28 5.081

    Total 164.800 29

    POSTEST Between Groups 64.533 1 64.533 7.325 .011

    Within Groups 246.667 28 8.810

    Total 311.200 29

    You might also like