The Three Levels of Comprehension: Schema Theory and Reading Comprehension
The Three Levels of Comprehension: Schema Theory and Reading Comprehension
The Three Levels of Comprehension: Schema Theory and Reading Comprehension
https://wehavekids.com/education/Reading-Comprehension-Theory
Schema theory is an explanation of how readers use prior knowledge to comprehend and learn from
text (Rumelhart, 1980). The term "schema" was first used in psychology by Barlett as "an active
organization of past reactions or experiences" (1932,p.201), later schema was introduced in reading by
Rumelhalt (1980), Carrell (1981) and Hudson (1982) when discussing the important role of background
knowledge in reading comprehension (all cited in An, 2013). The fundamental principle of the schema
theory assumes that written text does not carry meaning by itself. Rather, a text only provides directions
for readers as to how they should retrieve or construct meaning from their own previously acquired
knowledge (An, 2013).
According to schema theory, comprehending a text is an interactive process between the reader’s
background knowledge and the text. Efficient comprehension requires the ability to relate the textual
material to one's own knowledge. As Anderson (1977, p.369) point out, "every act of comprehension
involves one’s knowledge of the world as well". Reading comprehension operates in two directions,
from bottom up to the top and from the top down to the bottom of the hierarchy. Bottom-up processing
is activated by specific data from the text, while top-down processing starts with general to confirm
these predictions. These two kinds of processing are occurring simultaneously and interactively, which
adds to the concept of interaction or comprehension between bottom-up and top-down processes
(Carrel and Eiserhold, 1983. Cited in An, 2013).
1. The Literal Level: It is simply what the text says and what actually happens in
the story. This is a very important level of understanding because it provides the
foundation for more advanced comprehension. It focuses on reading the passages,
hearing the words or viewing the images. It involves identifying the important and
essential information. With guidance, students can distinguish between the important
and less important ideas.
2. The Inferential Level: It involves determining what the text means. Determining
inferential meaning requires you to think about the text and draw a conclusion. , the
focus shifts to reading between the lines, looking at what is implied by the material
under study. It requires students to combine pieces of information in order to make
inferences about the author's intent and message. Guiding students to recognize these
perceived relationships promotes understanding and decreases the risk of being
overwhelmed by the complexities of the text being view, heard or read.
3. The Critical Level: In this level we are analyzing or synthesizing information and
applying it to other information. Understandings at the literal and interpretive levels are
combined, reorganized and restructured at the critical level to express opinions, draw
new insights and develop fresh ideas. Guiding students through the applied level shows
them how to synthesize information, to read between the lines and to develop a deeper
understanding of the concepts, principles, and implications presented in the text.
Long ago, far away in the country, the people of a small town had an infestation of rats.
The people of the town could not handle the rats any longer so they urged their mayor
to do something about the infestation. In discussion with his men, the mayor had a
visitor at the door. It was a strange looking man with a pipe who said that said he was
the Piped Piper and he can get rid of the rats for the town. His terms were that the
mayor pays him one hundred dollars ($100) if he does. The mayor wanted to pay him
five hundred dollars ($500) but the piper was satisfied with the $100. The piper blew his
pipe and the rats followed him out of the town. The town’s people no longer had a rat
problem. The mayor then refused to pay the piper so he played his pipe once more and
this time, took the town’s children; never for their parents to see them again.
References