Bloom
Bloom
Bloom
o Site Map
o About
o Leadership
o Training
o Learning
o History
o Knowledge
o Performance
o Java
o Etc.
o News
o Blog
Contents
o Cognitive Domain
o Affective Domain
o Psychomotor Domain
o Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
o Next Steps
o Reference
Related Resources
Bloom's Taxonomy of
Learning Domains
The Three Types of Learning
There is more than one type of learning. A committee of colleges, led by Benjamin Bloom (1956), identified three
domains of educational activities:
Since the work was produced by higher education, the words tend to be a little bigger than we normally use.
Domains can be thought of as categories. Trainers often refer to these three categories as KSA (Knowledge, Skills,
and Attitude). This taxonomy of learning behaviors can be thought of as “the goals of the learning process.” That is,
after a learning episode, the learner should have acquired new skills, knowledge, and/or attitudes.
The committee also produced an elaborate compilation for the cognitive and affective domains, but none for the
psychomotor domain. Their explanation for this oversight was that they have little experience in teaching manual
skills within the college level (I guess they never thought to check with their sports or drama department).
This compilation divides the three domains into subdivisions, starting from the simplest behavior to the most
complex. The divisions outlined are not absolutes and there are other systems or hierarchies that have been devised
in the educational and training world. However, Bloom's taxonomy is easily understood and is probably the most
widely applied one in use today.
Cognitive Domain
Evaluation: Make judgments about the Examples: Select the most effective solution. Hire the
value of ideas or materials. most qualified candidate. Explain and justify a new
budget.
Affective Domain
The affective domain (Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia, 1973) includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally,
such as feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes. The five major categories are listed
from the simplest behavior to the most complex:
Psychomotor Domain
The psychomotor domain (Simpson, 1972) includes physical movement, coordination, and use of the motor-skill
areas. Development of these skills requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance,
procedures, or techniques in execution. The seven major categories are listed from the simplest behavior to the most
complex:
Set: Readiness to act. It includes mental, Examples: Knows and acts upon a sequence
physical, and emotional sets. These three sets of steps in a manufacturing process.
are dispositions that predetermine a person's Recognize one's abilities and limitations.
response to different situations (sometimes called Shows desire to learn a new process
mindsets). (motivation). NOTE: This subdivision of
Psychomotor is closely related with the
“Responding to phenomena” subdivision of the
Affective domain.
Taxonomies
As mentioned earlier, the committee did not produce a compilation for the psychomotor domain model, but others
have. The one discussed above is by Simpson (1972). There are two other popular versions:
Dave's (1975):
o Imitation — Observing and patterning behavior after someone else. Performance may be of
low quality. Example: Copying a work of art.
o Manipulation — Being able to perform certain actions by following instructions and practicing.
Example: Creating work on one's own, after taking lessons, or reading about it.
o Precision — Refining, becoming more exact. Few errors are apparent. Example: Working and
reworking something, so it will be “just right.”
o Articulation — Coordinating a series of actions, achieving harmony and internal consistency.
Example: Producing a video that involves music, drama, color, sound, etc.
o Naturalization — Having high level performance become natural, without needing to think
much about it. Examples: Michael Jordan playing basketball, Nancy Lopez hitting a golf ball, etc.
Harrow's (1972):
Lorin Anderson, a former student of Bloom, revisited the cognitive domain in the learning taxonomy in the mid-
nineties and made some changes, with perhaps the two most prominent ones being, 1) changing the names in the
six categories from noun to verb forms, and 2) slightly rearranging them (Pohl, 2000).
This new taxonomy reflects a more active form of thinking and is perhaps more accurate:
The six steps of Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating uses the same
key words or verbs as shown in the table in the Cognitive Domain section.
Next Steps
Reference
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David
McKay Co Inc.
Dave, R. H. (1975). Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. (R. J. Armstrong, ed.). Tucson, Arizona:
Educational Innovators Press.
Harrow, A. (1972) A Taxonomy of Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York:
David McKay.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of
Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of
Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.
Simpson E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC:
Gryphon House.
Notes
Search