VCD777 [English] – Page 1 of 8

[18 August 2008]

Adhyatmik Ishwariya Vishwa Vidyalaya

God Fatherly University
www.pbks.info a1spiritual@sify.com

VCD No.777, Audio Cassette No.1263,

dated 7.10.07, at Bangalore -1
Clarification of Murli dated 30.1.68 (for BKs)

Om Shanti. Today’s morning class is of 30th January 1968.The spiritual father sits and
explains to the spiritual children. Who is the spiritual father and who is the bodily father? The
spiritual father means the father of souls and the bodily father means the father of human beings.
So, spiritual father sits in the father of human beings and explains to the spiritual children.
Human beings are body conscious. He doesn’t explain to body conscious human beings. He
explains to the children who have sat in soul conscious stage. So, at first, the children have got
the introduction of the father. When a small child takes birth, it first gets the introduction of its
parents. Even amongst you there are numberwise ones according to their effort who got the
introduction of the creator father. Who should we call as the creator father? Should we call the
father of the point-like souls, the spiritual father as the creator father? Or is it some other
personality whom should we call the creator father? The point-like souls are eternal,
imperishable. There is no question of creating them at all. And the father of souls, the spiritual
father, even he is not created. He is also eternal and imperishable. So, the spiritual father is
neither a creator nor does he create the spiritual children. He only comes and gives the
knowledge of soul. So, the children come to know that they are souls. Nevertheless, it is not like
this that the soul was not there at first. The children know this too. The father alone is the highest
on high. And one has to say only his praise. ‘The highest on high and the praise worthy’
(Mahimavant), does this happen in the corporeal world or in the incorporeal world? The question
of highest on high and lowest of low arises in the corporeal world. There is a praise of the
highest on high when he performs the highest on high role in this corporeal world. People also
praise- Om shivay namah (I, a soul bow to Shiv). Om is prefixed to Shiv. They also say- shivay
namah (I bow to Shiv). Brahmay namah (I bow to Brahma), Vishnuay namah (I bow to Vishnu),
this doesn’t suit. Shivay namah (I bow to Shiv) suits. For Brahma and Vishnu, it will be said –
Brahma devtay namah (I bow to Brahma, a deity). When Brahma becomes a deity, one bows
before him. Vishnu devtay namah (I bow to Vishnu, a deity). So, by attaching (the word) ‘devta’,
the word becomes attractive (shobhayman). So, one would have to say devta (deity). But the
highest on high is ‘Bhagwan’ (God). There is a difference between Bhagwan (God) and deity.
When someone comes to the exhibition etc., first one should certainly tell them about the glory
of the highest on high father. He is the Supreme father. There is no other father higher than him.
The children forget. While explaining, they don’t remember that how should they narrate the
glory of the father.

First, explain that He is the supreme father, teacher and Guru as well. He is the only one
who performs a role in the form of the father as well; he sows the seed of knowledge and gives
inheritance at last. He is also the teacher in between and performs the role of Guru at last. So,
one will have to remember all the three. If one remembers the father, then one will get
inheritance of joy and peace through the relation of the father. If one remembers the teacher, then
one will get the depth of each and every matter and if one remembers the Guru, then one will get
the true salvation (sadgati). (Someone said something.). Yes, one has to remember Shivbaba
alone. Moreover, one has to remember in all the three forms, one has to make this firm.
VCD777 [English] – Page 2 of 8
[18 August 2008]

Whether as a father, whether as a teacher, whether as a Sadguru (true preceptor),

Shivbaba is the actor in all the three forms. So, first, one has to praise the father. Certainly you
know, only then you praise (the father). Then, they consider (thok dete hai) such a highest on
high God to be in mud and wall (thikkar-bhittar). So, such souls, who are like thikkar that is a
lump of mud; who will break away, who will disperse if they get a little kick from Maya. God is
considered to be pervasive in them.

Those who sit or stand as an obstacle like a bhit i.e. a wall in the path of knowledge;
God is considered to be present in such ones. If he is said to be in a human being, even then it is
alright. A human being is called as the progeny of Manu. The one who does thinking and
churning is called as a human being. In a way, one cannot say (God is) in human beings too. He
doesn’t remain in one particular human body always.

He certainly takes loan. Any soul doesn’t take the support of anyone else’s body. He
himself says- I take their support. So, at first one has to be made firm on the main issue. The
highest on high father whom we praise, is the true father. He is called as the truth God father. He
himself narrates to us the true story of Satyanarayan. And the truth father alone makes us
Narayan from Nar (the man).

The kingdom of these Laxmi- Narayan was there, wasn’t it? Certainly, their kingdom was
in the Golden age. How did he become SatyaNarayan? The entire world becomes false; all the
human beings become false. The story of one SatyaNarayan is sung in the world of false people.
So, how did he become such a truthful one? When was he made truthful like that? Who made
him? And when was this true story of SatyaNarayan narrated? When did he teach the Rajyog for
becoming Narayan from Nar? Now, you understand all these things. All other human beings
have connection (Yog) with human beings. It doesn’t happen so that the connection of a human
being is with an incorporeal one. And even that incorporeal one is not just for the sake of saying,
but with an understanding of what the incorporeal is and what the corporeal is, what the
incorporeal one is, how the one who is incorporeal (Nirakari) becomes without vices (Nirvikari),
egoless (Nirhankari).

Does he become incorporeal, without vices and egoless, when he is in the corporeal form
or is there this praise without the corporeal? So, one should have a knowledge about that too.
Even though, now-a-days they establish a connection with Shiv, they worship him but they don’t
know that Shiv, whom they worship. They don’t understand anything at all. They have just
placed a ling made up of stone in the temple; that is all. They apply a dot (bindi) on that and
keep worshipping. They don’t know why this ling of stone has been made in the Iron Age. In
scriptures, the matter of a golden ling has been mentioned, a Silver ling is also mentioned, a
Copper ling is famous as well and a ling of iron and stone is also kept.

But, what does it mean? Hm? Does Shiv pass through these four stages? The Supreme
soul Shiv doesn’t pass through the four stages. He is ever benevolent (Sadashiv). But the body in
which he enters in a permanent form, that passes through four stages in the entire kalp (cycle of
5000 years). It is because that soul is coloured by the company as well.

They also understand that Prajapita Brahma will certainly be present in this corporeal
world. It is not possible that Prajapita Brahma is not there in the corporeal world and subjects are
there. Wherever the 5 to 7 billion subjects exist and until the subjects exist, Praja pita will
certainly be present in this corporeal world. They are confused. They think that first Prajapita
Brahma should be in the Golden age. If Prajapita Brahma were in the Golden age, then why has
the subtle world been shown? They don’t understand the meaning at all. That Prajapita is also in
the bondage of Karma (karmabandhan). With whom is the bondage of karma?
VCD777 [English] – Page 3 of 8
[18 August 2008]

It has been said that if Bap Dada want to, they can go back. So, can the one who goes
back have bondage of Karma? Then? (Someone said- he has stopped for the children.). He is a
father, so a father cannot go back without doing benefit to the children. He is in bondage of
karma, then certainly he has some bondage of karma with the children. (Someone said- the
children will also have bondage of karma, won’t they?) The children will indeed have first. The
Father cannot go leaving the children.

Two fathers are sitting in only one personality. One is the father of souls and another is
the father of all human beings. He is always Karmateet (beyond the effect of actions). Who? The
spiritual father is always (atit) beyond karma. He remains detached from the bondage of karma
even while He performs karma through the bodily organs. And He is himself the giver of the
knowledge. There is only one father who gives the knowledge. There are two unlimited fathers.
But, the giver of knowledge is only one spiritual father. When he comes and gives you the
knowledge, then narrate it to the others. Who comes? When the spiritual father comes and gives
you the knowledge, then narrate it to the others. Who should narrate? Arey, even amongst the
children, who is the child who should narrate?

The spiritual father is the one who comes; he comes from the spiritual world. He comes
and gives the knowledge to you first. When it was said in the vani of ‘68– ‘to you’, so, was that
‘you’ present before (the father) in ‘68? He was not present, but (Baba) said it by emerging
(him). When I give you the knowledge, then narrate it to the others.

If one doesn’t have the knowledge, then how can one narrate it to the others? You have
to give the introduction of the father. It is very easy and (you) should explain just on Alaf. Just
like in the basic knowledge, the picture of 32 rays has been prepared and the picture of
incorporeal point of light has been kept in the middle (of that). If someone explained on it, then
will anyone understand the subject of the 32 virtues, that the incorporeal one has 32 virtues?
Nobody will understand it. That is why, one should explain on Alaf. One is a point (bindu) which
is called as Nukta in Urdu. Then there is an Alaf, the vertical stick (khada danda). And then in
the second number, there is a horizontal stick (pada danda) Bay.

So, one should explain on Alaf- this is the unlimited father of all the souls. There is no
difficulty in giving the introduction to someone. It is very simple. But if the one, who is
explaining, himself doesn’t have faith, then he cannot explain to anyone. When can the one who
explains explain? When he himself has faith. The more firm the faith with which one explains,
the faster it will sit in other’s intellect. For example, there are the ignorant human beings,
similarly if the one who has a faithless intellect sits and explains to someone, then they too will
come in the list of ignorant people. If one doesn’t have the faith oneself and he makes show off
of the knowledge in front of others, if he starts giving introduction of the father then, will such
ones be called as knowledgeable or ignorant? If one doesn’t give the knowledge, then it means
that he is ignorant. The one who is soul conscious will have the knowledge. If one doesn’t have
the knowledge, then he is a devotee, consider that he is body conscious.

We are souls; our father is the Supreme father Supreme soul. He is our teacher as well as
Guru. Prajapita Brahma is also there, isn’t he? But, how did Prajapita come in the subtle world?
The praja (subjects) are here, in this world. So, Prajapita is also in this world. The father has told
the occupation of Prajapita Brahma too, he has also told the occupation of Vishnu. It has been
told for Shankar that he has no role at all. If he doesn’t have any role, then what should one
understand, is there Shankar or not? When there is no role, then what will he do, if he is present?
A role is performed through bodily organs. Shankar is shown to be sitting in remembrance. So,
remembrance is a matter related to the intellect. One cannot see anybody performing Karma by
the mind and intellect. That is why; it has been told that it is as if he doesn’t have any role at all.
VCD777 [English] – Page 4 of 8
[18 August 2008]

But it is not like this that Shankar does not exist. Those devotees have combined Shankar
with Shiv. Who combined Shiv and Shankar? Why did the devotees combine them? Why did the
intellectuals [knowledgeable ones] explain both separately? The devotees don’t have the third
eye of the knowledge. Do they see the corporeal one or the incorporeal one through the ignorant
eyes? (Someone said-the corporeal one.). Did many amongst the so-called Brahmakumar-
kumaris see the corporeal Brahma or did they follow the versions of the incorporeal father Shiv?
They saw the corporeal one. So, should they be called as ignorant or knowledgeable? Hm?
(Some one said-ignorant). They saw the corporeal one and could not understand the incorporeal
one in him, so, it is as if they became ignorant. So, the devotees combined both Shiv and
Shankar into one. But, why did those devotees not combine Shiv and Brahma into one? Hm?

It is because Brahma does not reach to such a stage of effort that he would become
incorporeal, without vices and egoless like Shiv, so that even the consciousness of the subtle
body would finish. About Shankar, they will understand later on that he has achieved the stage
equal to the father. Then, they think that Shankar performs the destruction. This has also been
cooked up. Actually, does Shankar perform the destruction in practical or do the shaktis, the
destroyers; the destroyer-of-the-demons (sangharkarini, aasur sanharani shaktiya) perform the
task of the destruction? This is the praise of the Shaktis (consorts). So, they have cooked up
these issues. Nevertheless, it is not true that the world will be burnt into ashes by Shankar
opening his eye. This is a matter in the unlimited sense.

This is the praise of the confluence aged Brahmin world that even the soul of Shankar is
at first a Brahmin in the form of an effort-maker in the confluence aged Brahmin world. Just like
the other Brahmins are incomplete, he too is in an incomplete stage. But when he opens the third
eye of knowledge while in a seed-like stage and in a complete soul conscious stage, then
disintegration (vightan) takes place in the old Brahmin world. Just like it happened in the year
‘76. Such a fire of the knowledge emerges, which burns the ones who are like Ravan,
Kumbhakarna, Meghnad. And the ones who have a firm soul conscious stage, do not get harmed
by the heat. So, does the destruction take place by Shankar opening his eye? They think that the
destruction of the outside world takes place by opening the eye and that he might be having a
third physical eye. It is not true. This is about the eye of knowledge.

When the true knowledge sits in the intellect, the destruction of demoniac sanskar and
demoniac atmosphere takes place. It is not true that when he opens the eye, the world gets burnt
into ashes. These are bombs. Natural calamities take place. The bombs blast and the Earth
becomes imbalanced. When the balance is disturbed, massive earthquakes occur, volcanoes
erupt, and because the Earth shakes, the biggest population of the world which lives in the
multistory buildings; they all get buried and die.

So, see, Shankar has been made sinful. Is the task of destruction dirty or good? (Someone
said- it is a good task). Is it a good task? When the destruction takes place, they will shout so
much cries of despair. They will become so sorrowful. (Someone said-the sinful karma of
everyone gets burnt into ashes due to it.) For e.g., there is some king, he gives punishment to a
thief, robber, murderer, but practically, who gives him the punishment of Death (mrutyudand),
the cremator (chandal) or the king? Hm? The cremator gives. The king has only given the
judgment so that the good should be distinguished from the bad. The cremator gives the
punishment of death. Similarly, the one who is Prakruti, i.e. nature, when she becomes very
much degraded (ati tamsi), then she becomes instrumental in causing the destruction of the
entire world.

If Shankar performs destruction, then as if Shankar will belong to the demoniac

community. Does the destruction take place due to purity or due to impurity? The destruction
VCD777 [English] – Page 5 of 8
[18 August 2008]

takes place due to impurity. Will Shankar be called as impure or pure? Brahma, Vishnu, Shankar
are shown as the subtle world dweller angels. Those who don’t have any relation with the people
dwelling on the land (farsh ki duniyavale) are called angels. If relations are attached with bodily
beings, then they are called as sinful. If there is no relation at all, then whom does he remember?
One father and none else. The father, whom he remembers, is always incorporeal, without vices
and egoless. So, how can Shankar belong to the demoniac community? And on one side, it is
said- Dev, Dev, Mahadev. Tridev (three deities) are the biggest Deities amongst the 33 crore (330
million) deities. And the superior deity amongst the three deities is Mahadev. Then, how can
deities belong to the demoniac community?

These pictures of Trimurti etc. are not accurate. Towards which pictures the hint has
been given? The picture of Trimurty which was prepared with the divine visions, even for that it
has been said that these are not accurate. It is because the face of Brahma has been shown in all
the three idols (Murtiya). The face which has been shown in the form of Vishnu and in the form
of Shankar, from those the mustache of Brahma has been removed. The face is the same, as it is.
(Someone said-Baba it has been told - Trimurty etc. it means that all the four pictures are not
accurate). The picture of Trimurty is in all the four pictures. The one which is Trimurty is there
in all the four pictures, isn’t it? So, all these are meaningless pictures.

What does ‘all’ mean? All these four pictures are meaningless. The Trimurty, World cycle
(Gola), The Tree, The Ladder become meaningless because there is no true picture of the
Trimurty in them. How can Vishnu be present with the ornaments in the subtle world? This is not
the question of the subtle world at all. Will the sustenance through Vishnu take place in the
subtle world or in the corporeal world? The sustenance takes place in the corporeal world. The
meaning of the ornaments etc. is different. These ornaments have been shown as a symbol of the
virtues. These are the ornaments of the divine virtues. If one understands like this, even then it is
alright. Otherwise, even that is not alright. You will say-these are the scriptures, pictures etc. of
the Bhakti marg (path of devotion). In the path of devotion they understand with superstition that
Vishnu must be a personality having four arms. That is not possible there.

This Prajapita Brahma is also a bodily being. There are so many children. So, all these
pictures etc are for worship etc. in the path of devotion. How can Prajapita Brahma be present
there in the subtle world? The father has explained that this Brahma is Vyakta (manifest) but that
one is Avyakta (unmanifest). When he becomes Avyakta, he becomes an angel in the subtle
world.

The second page of the vani of 30th January 1968. The supreme abode, the subtle world
are there practically, aren’t they? It is a matter of stage. One goes to the subtle world, doesn’t
one? So, these pictures etc. are not accurate. The father sits and explains the meaning of these,
that what the meaning of Brahma is. If there are words, then they have meanings, haven’t they?
The names are given on the basis of tasks, aren’t they? So, the father explains the true meaning.

Prajapita Brahma, who was a human being, himself, becomes an angel afterwards.
Prajapita Brahma becomes an angel, then does the corporeal body remain or not remain? It
remains. Then, is there a connection with those dwelling on the land or not? Hm? He becomes an
angel, so the relation with the people dwelling on the land ends. After becoming an angel, here it
is shown regarding kingship as well. Then, these will rule. If these pictures of the subtle world
are not there, even then there will be a difficulty in understanding.

In fact, this form of Vishnu with four arms is not there as well. The ones who are from
the path of devotion don’t have the clarification of the form which has the four arms. The Father
comes and explains. Arms mean helpers. Some become cooperative in a righteous form and
VCD777 [English] – Page 6 of 8
[18 August 2008]

some become cooperative in a leftist form. Vishnu has four arms. Two are in the righteous form
and two are in the leftist form. What does cooperative in the righteous form mean? Those two
arms meaning the two co-operative souls never looked at the bad qualities of anyone. What did
they see in every child? They saw only their virtues. They never described about their bad
qualities. They did not see the bad qualities even while looking at it.

And (what about) the leftist hands? Mahakal and Mahakali. What is their role? Hm?
Their role is that they see the virtues as well as the bad qualities through the third eye. But, when
the bad qualities are seen, then will one get coloured by the company of those bad qualities or
not? (Someone said something.). Will they not get coloured? Hm? Will the task become difficult
or easy? (Someone said-it will become difficult.). If one looks at bad qualities of someone, and if
someone is such an effort-maker that he looks into only virtues, he does not see the bad qualities
even while looking at them. So, who will be benefited? For the one who looks at virtues it will
be easy. The one who does, will get (jo karega so payega). The one who resides above (God) has
come. He knows his task. So, by looking at the bad qualities, one certainly gets affected by it to
some extent or the other.

So, two souls are the co-operatives in the form of leftist. The task is difficult, even then
they are co-operative. So, the four arms have been shown in the form of helpers. These four arms
become co-operative in the Godly task. The four-armed form which has been shown in the path
of devotion doesn’t have any meaning. The father sits and explains here. Because we have to
become pure from impure through the Father. So, will we become pure from impure in the subtle
world? It is not a matter of the subtle world at all. The soul has to become pure. After becoming
pure, we will go back to our abode. When a soul achieves a pure stage i.e. complete stage, then
will it remain bound within this body or will it fly up? It will not feel good to remain in the body
at all. It will become detached (upram).

Of course souls live in the incorporeal world. There are corporeal (people) in this world.
As regards the rest, there is no main story of the subtle world. The angels of the subtle world are
not praised in the Deity religion. In which religion are angels praised? (Someone said-Islam).
Angels are praised among Christians and Muslims. They don’t believe in deities. Why don’t they
believe? Hm? (Someone said- they don’t recognize corporeal). It is because; the Christians and
the Muslims who get converted into other religions do not take 84 births at all. The ones who
didn’t take complete 84 births at all, they cannot study directly from the Supreme father
Supreme soul and become deities. What do they become? After leaving the physical body, what
do they become? They become subtle bodied beings. So, there is the praise of angels in their
religions, there is no praise of deities.

Now the father explains the secret of the subtle world as well. Whereas it is told in
Murli- what is the subtle world? It is nothing. So, what is the secret? The subtle world (Sookshm
vatan) means the subtle stage of the mind and intellect. It is such a subtle stage where the soul
forgets the corporeal body, the relations of the body and the materials related to the body. That
which is called a subtle stage (Aakari stage). It remains in thinking and churning of the
knowledge, it remains in the planning of new world, or the intellect remains in Godly service.
The intellect becomes detached from this corporeal world and its occupations.

They are in fact numberwise. The supreme abode (Moolvatan), then the subtle world and
then the physical world. The highest stage is of the supreme abode. But, no one can directly go
to the supreme abode (Moolvatan) until he achieves a subtle stage of thinking and churning.
Whoever comes, first of all, one should give them the introduction of the father, that the father is
a resident of the supreme abode (Moolvatan) and he always resides in the supreme abode. He
comes in this world, comes in the corporeal world, comes in a sinful world, comes in a sinful
VCD777 [English] – Page 7 of 8
[18 August 2008]

body and comes among sinful ones; even so he remains in an incorporeal stage of the Supreme
Abode. He is the father.

Even in the path of devotion they say-Baba, Baba, oh God! don’t they? But, they only
don’t recognize. They always say- Shiv Parmatmay namah (I bow to Shiv, the supreme soul),
they never say Shiv, the Deity. What? They will not say Shiv, the Deity. But, what about
Shankar? They will say Shankar is a deity. It means that Shiv is God and Shankar is a deity.
They say-Brahma devtay namah (I bow to Brahma, the deity). Shiv is called as the Supreme
soul. He is also called as the Supreme Father Supreme Soul.

Then, little indeed is he called as omnipresent? Hm? When should he be called

omnipresent? He will be called omnipresent when he enters each and every soul. But, does he
enter each and every soul? Or does he enter that supreme soul who performs the supreme role,
role of a hero among all souls? He enters only one. He comes in only one( Ekvyapi), he doesn’t
come as omnipresent. He has to perform the duty of transforming the sinful into pure, hasn’t he?
If he will enter everybody and start making the sinful ones into pure ones, then will they remain
sinful itself or will they become pure? Hm? Will all effort-makers be alike? No.

The highest on high father comes, and then certainly, he would be entering only the
highest on high. Just like, Abraham, Buddha, Christ come, do they enter the highest on high
deities, do they enter the highest deities who are numberwise ones, Or do they enter the deity
souls who descend at the end of Kaliyug (Iron age)? They enter the numberwise deity souls.
Similarly, those religious fathers are numberwise high. They will not be called as the highest on
high. But this is the highest on high father. Such a highest on high father will certainly enter in
the highest on high actor, only then he can perform the duty of making the sinful into pure ones.

So, will he come in mud and wall (thikkar-bhittar) for making sinful into pure ones? If he
comes in a lump of mud (thikkar), then the ones whose company he will keep, they will also
become of mud like intellect (thikkar buddhi). If he comes in a stone-like intellect, then the ones
whose company he will keep, they will also become of a stone-like intellect [pattar buddhi].
This knowledge of omnipresence is called as terrible darkness (Ghor andhiyara). But, even this
is predetermined in the drama. What? The spread of the knowledge of omnipresence. In which
Age (Yug) does it spread? This knowledge spreads in the Copper and the Iron Age that the
Supreme soul is omnipresent. Where does the shooting take place? (Someone said- in the
confluence age). How? No Brahmakumar-kumari over here says that the Supreme soul is
omnipresent. (Someone said- they sit and give Drishti). They do not say so but they perform
such an action practically, due to which it sits in the intellect of the people that these are forms of
the Supreme soul. They do not understand anything. The Father comes and explains-Yada
yadahi dharmasya, glanirbhavati bharat. Whenever such a defamation of the Supreme Father
Supreme soul takes place in India (Bharat), that- God is pervasive in mud and wall and in every
particle, I come at that time. It has been written in Sanskrit in scriptures. Whatever has been
written in the scriptures, in which language has it been written? (Someone said-in Sanskrit). It
has been written in Sanskrit. Of where are the scriptures a memorial? They are a memorial of the
path of devotion itself. The memorials which have been made in the path of devotion, where is
their foundation laid? The foundation is laid in the Confluence Age.

What does Sanskrit mean? The meaning of Sanskrit is the one which is reformed. Will it
be called as the reformed knowledge when one starts understanding it, or will the knowledge
which one doesn’t understand at all be called as the reformed one? Someone reads out a Shloka
in Sanskrit (A Sanskrit couplet), the gathering doesn’t understand anything. So, will it be called
as knowledge for the gathering or is it like- to cast pearls before swine [Bhaiske aage been
VCD777 [English] – Page 8 of 8
[18 August 2008]

bajana ], will it be called as ignorance? That is a matter of ignorance. Knowledge is the one
which gives understanding.

Whatever was narrated through Brahma, will that be called as Sanskrit or Vedvani? That
was Vedvani. Vedvani has been written in the Vaidik language in the path of devotion. Sanskrit
was prepared afterwards. Similarly, the Murlis which were narrated through Brahma, the
knowledge that emerged from his mouth, is Vedvani. Nobody understands its meaning. Many
matters have been clarified later on in the Sanskrit language. So, father comes and explains its
meaning.

It has been written in Geeta-Yada yadahi dharmasya, when defamation of religion takes
place…. So, the defamation of which religion takes place? Whichever other religions are there in
the world, are already irreligiousness in the name of religion. They are not religions at all.
Actually, the Ancient deity religion (Devidevta Sanatan Dharm) gets defamed. It has been
written-Sambhavami yuge yuge , I come in every Yug (Age). Then, it has been written-he is
omnipresent. What meaning do those people give after narrating the Shloka- you children should
observe that as well. You have to go there and say that we do not understand its meaning. So,
they will narrate immediately. Little indeed will they understand that these are some
Brahmakumar-kumaris? Although you have a white dress, but there is no stamp of
Brahmakumari affixed on you. If any male goes and asks, then they will narrate immediately. If
you come to know what meaning they give, then Baba will explain its meaning. One should give
the report to Baba. But no such child is there. This Chinmayanand and so on go; they go
everywhere. Wherever you go you should listen to them and come. You can also ask, ‘we didn’t
at all understand its meaning’. See, what they narrate.

All the remaining pictures that are there are for explaining in detail. (Baba) explains such
immeasurable knowledge. Make the ocean into ink; even then it doesn’t have an end. Then the
matter of a second is also narrated here. You have to just give the introduction of the father. He is
the only one father who is the purifier of the sinful ones (patit pavan) and the unlimited father.
And that father himself is the creator of heaven. All the other human beings do get the title of
father, they indeed become a father but nobody establishes heaven. Why don’t they? Hm?
Because no one is the father. Many have indeed become fathers in the world; Abraham, Buddha,
Christ, Guru Nanak became fathers of the highest category. 1.5 billion to 2 billion Christians
have considered Christ as their father. But, there is no father among those fathers who always
remains in the self stage. For this reason, none of them can establish heaven. This is the only
father who is called as Ever Benevolent (sadashiv) because he always remains in the self stage.
And he alone establishes heaven. We are his children, brothers among each other….