Wre Micro Project
Wre Micro Project
Wre Micro Project
“Watershed management
. Program”
2021-2022
ThisMicro-projectssubmittedinpartialfulfillmentofthe
Requirementfortheawardof diplomain
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Undertheguidanceof
Dr.A.W.Pawde
( LecturerinCvilEngineeringDepartment)
SUBMITTED BY
Vishal.R.Shende
DEPARTMENTOF CIVILENGINEERING
GOVERNMENTPOLYTECHINCBRAMHAPURI
2021-2022
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Mr. Vishal . R. Shende of
Fifth semester of " DIPLOMA IN CIVILENGINEERING " has
satisfactorily completed this project entitled"Watershed Management
program " During this year 2021- 2022 in requirement of the partial
fulfillment of Diploma courses civil Engineering.
DR. A. W. PAWDE
(MICRO-PROJECTGUIDE)
SUBMISSION
I am Mr.Vishal R. Shende Roll No. 03 a student of
Third year of Department of Civil Engineering , humbly
completed this microproject in Subject “ Water Resources
Engineering” work from the time to time as described in this report
by ourown skill and study between the period from 2021-
2022.
As per instructions and Guidance of Dr.A.W
Pawde and that, Ihave not copedi the report
or it's any apprecabe part from any other iterative
contravention of thrilling academcethcs.ii
Date:-
Sign
Name:-................................
..............
Contents
4 The Water Crisis: Issues and Concerns
5 Hard Facts
32 Annexures
34 References
Abbreviations
In much of India, very little rainwater is captured, infiltrated and stored as groundwater –
most is lost in runoff to oceans and evaporation, usually taking fertile surface soil with it. In
light of this, the only sustainable and eco-friendly solution to manage and raise groundwater
levels, and revive water resources, is the development of watershed management programs
to harvest, secure and conserve rain water.
1 Thakare, Parag R., Jadhav, Raj A. and Kumawat Hastimal S. 2013. Watershed M anagement-A case study of Satara Tanda
Village. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), (3) 3: 2278-3075.
2 Joshi PK, Jha AK, Wani SP, Sreedevi TK and Shaheen FA. 2008. Impact of Watershed Program and Conditions for
Success: A M eta-Analysis Approach. Global Theme on Agro ecosystems, Report 46. International Crops Research Institute
for the Semi-Arid Tropics and National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research.
3 Rao, Srinivasa., Lal, Ratan., Prasad, Jasti., Gopinath, Kodigal., Singh, Rajbir., Jakkula,Vijay S Kanwar., Sahrawat L.,
Venkateswarlu, Bandi., Sikka, Alok K, and Virmani, Surinder M . 2015. Potential and Challenges of Rainfed Farming in
India. Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press. pp. 113 -114.
Hard Facts
• India's annual per capita availability of water decreased from 6,042 cubic meters in
1947, to 1816 cubic meters in 2001, and was down to 1,545 cubic meters in 2011.
• By 2025, India's annual per capita availability of water will further reduce to 1,340
cubic meters and by 2050, to 1,140 cubic meters.
• 90 % of waste water discharged in rivers fails to meet environmental norms.
• 65% of rainwater runoff goes into the sea.
• In India, the agricultural sector is the biggest user of water, followed by the
domestic and industrial sectors.
Scarce local employment opportunities and the increasing unviability of agriculture due to
water shortages and ever smaller land holdings have accelerated the urban migration of
low-skilled and less-educated rural men. This puts pressure on cities and aggravates
disparities in migrant rights, including access to health, education and basic human rights.
Their families remain behind to battle the financial hardship of rural life, relying heavily on
remittances. The net result is a vicious cycle of grinding poverty, and lack of access to basic
health and education, compounded by a lack of access to basic financial literacy and
inclusion in the absence of credit and social security schemes.
2,40,67,232
1,56,87,157
96,64,000
45,80,074
Maharashtra Chattisgargh
Chhattisgarh Rajasthan Gujarat
Why EdelGive Foundation works in Watershed Projects
Creating sustainable livelihoods is the surest way to help individuals escape the vicious circle
of poverty. The main effect of poverty is the inability to meet essential needs, so creating
sustainable livelihoods has wide-ranging benefits. The key outcome is that individuals can
take charge of their own lives, choose the services and products of which they wish to avail,
and invest in themselves and their future generations, rather than relying on charity or
public services for their basic needs. Rural livelihoods fall into two broad categories: farm
and non-farm based activities. Watershed management programs are a part of farm-based
activities and have several impacts.
Process flow
▪ Research & Scoping of organisations ▪ EdelGive Board Evaluation
▪ Proposal submission ▪ Grant-making by signing MOU
▪ Field and community visit ▪ Monitoring and Evaluation
▪ Due Diligence ▪ Impact Assessment
Framework of evaluation
‘Demand-driven’ rather than ‘supply-driven’ water projects
Implementation through local community, village-level committees and SHGs
Greater involvement of women and vulnerable groups
Greater community participation, contribution and resource-sharing
Integration of traditional and modern techniques for water security
Decentralized process of decision-making
Indigenous solutions to address local problems of water scarcity
Generating demonstrable economic benefits to the community
Equal rights on common property resources
Implementation process
▪ Baseline Survey
▪ Community Mobilisation
▪ Formation of Community-Based Organisations
▪ Village meetings & Participatory Rural Appraisals
▪ Village Development Committees’ Training
▪ Site Identification for Water Shed Structures
▪ Construction and Implementation of Watershed Programs
▪ Community Monitoring and Maintenance
▪ Impact Assessment of Watershed Management Programs
▪ Scaling and Replication of Watershed Programs
History of Watershed Management Programs
Several studies have shown that effective management of natural resources through
watershed management programs delivers sustainable ecological benefits and drives
community development. This includes increasing crop production, recharging groundwater
levels, rejuvenating dried-up rivers and ponds, improving livelihoods, reversing the process
of migration, protecting the environment, boosting women’s empowerment and ensuring
food, fodder and fuel security5.
Over the past thirty years, watershed management programs have produced three major
changes in India. The first generation of watershed projects was introduced in the 1970s,
the second generation by the mid-1980s and the third by the early 1990s 6. However, a
closer examination of current watershed programs and structures reveals that many are still
executed under the first- and second- generation models i.e. with a top-down (rather than a
bottom-up approach) and smaller participation from communities.
III Generation
I Generation
II Generation
1. Pre-Independence Scenario
Agriculture has been the driving force of the Indian economy, both before and after
Independence, and the majority of the rural population was heavily dependent on
5 Joshi PK, Jha AK, Wani SP, Joshi L and Shiyani RL. 2005. Meta-analysis to assess impact of watershed
program and people’s participation. Research Report 8, Comprehensive Assessment of watershed management
in agriculture. InternationalCrops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics and Asian Development Bank.
21 pp.
6 Wani SP, Ramakrishna, Sreedevi TK, Long TD, Thawilkal Wangkahart, Shiferaw B, Pathak and Kesava Rao.
2006. Issues, concepts, approaches and practices in the integrated watershed management. Experience and
lessons from Asia in integrated management of watershed for agricultural diversification and sustainable
livelihoods in Eastern and Central Africa: Lessons and experiences from Semi-Arid South Asia. Proceedings of
the International Workshop held in December 2004 at Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 17–36.
agriculture for its livelihood. The following is cursory glance at references to watershed
irrigation in ancient Indian folklore and literature:
The Satavahanas (1st Century B.C. – 2nd Century A.D.) introduced brick and ring wells
for extraction of water.
Lake and well irrigation techniques were developed on a large scale during the
Pandya, Chera and Chola dynasties in southern India (1st to 3rd Century A.D) and
large dams were built across Cauvery and Vaigai rivers.
In the south, the Pallavas expanded the irrigation systems in the 7th Century A.D. The
famous Cauvery Anicut was built during this period.
The Chola period (985-1205 A.D) witnessed the introduction of advanced irrigation
systems, which brought about prosperity in the Deccan region.
The Rajput dynasty (1000-1200 A.D) promoted irrigation works in northern India.
The 647 sq. Km. Bhopal Lake was built under King Bhoja.
In eastern India, Pal and Sen Kings (760-1100 A.D) built a number of large tanks and
lakes in their kingdoms.
Rajtarangini of Kalhana gives a detailed account of irrigation systems developed in
the 12th Century in Kashmir.
In the Medieval period, Mohammad Bin Tughlaq (1325-1351 A.D.) encouraged the
farmers to build their own rainwater harvesting systems and wells.
Feroze Shah Tughlaq (1351-1388
A.D.) built the Western Yamuna
Canal in 1355 to extend
irrigation facilities in the dry
land tracts of the present-day
Haryana and Rajasthan.
Emperor Shahjahan built many
canals, among them the Bari
Doab or the Hasli Canal.
Under the rule of Rangila
Muhammad Shah, the Eastern
Yamuna Canal was built to
irrigate large tracts in Uttar Pradesh.
The Vijaynagar Kings (1336-1548 A.D.) built large and small storage tanks in the
south.
Anantraj Sagar, a 1.37 km. earthen dam tank, was built along the Maldevi River.
Emperor Krishnadevaraya built the well-known Korangal dam.
Canal irrigation was first introduced by the Bahmani rulers (1388-1422 A.D.) in the
eastern provinces of the Deccan.
An extensive network of canals was subsequently built by Sultan Zain Uddin (1420-
1470 A.D.) in Utpalpur, Nadashaila, and Bijbihara and Advin areas of Kashmir.
2. Post-Independence Scenario
After Independence, the tempo of irrigation development was sharply accelerated with the
objective of attaining self-sufficiency in food grains to meet the needs of a growing
population. Construction of large dams like Bhakra, Hirakud, and Nagarjunasagar were
taken up and completed. The criteria for economic evaluation of these projects were
changed from a purely financial evaluation approach to one of cost-benefit evaluation.
The Government’s Return-on-Investment now became secondary, and the benefit to the
farmer (if at a cost to the Government) became the principal criterion. The development of
irrigation took place in successive plans by leaps and bounds. The country achieved self-
sufficiency in food grains, and import of food grains became a thing of the past. The Second
Irrigation Commission, set up in 1969, while not advocating any major change in the policy
of irrigation development, cautioned in its report that areas like conjunctive use of surface
and groundwater, command area development. The flow of institutional finance was
generally about 60% of the total outlay for groundwater development. Groundwater
development became critical to the economy because of its role in stabilizing agriculture.
There was even greater emphasis on this resource during recurring periods of drought, as
the levels of surface reservoirs dwindled and groundwater provided an alternative.
• The Watershed Committee is constituted by the Gram Sabha to implement the project at
field level. This Watershed Committee consists of at least 10 members, comprising the
members representing Self-Help Groups, User Groups, SC/STs, Women and the Landless,
plus one member from Watershed Development Team.
2. Bottom-up approach
In the early days of watershed management programs, most of the water programs were
mainly ‘agency-driven’ or ‘supply-driven’ rather than ‘demand-driven’ i.e. implementing
agencies developed and implemented water-shed projects with no active participation or
contribution from the community. However, this failed to achieve even the most basic goals
of the projects. On the other hand, the ‘bottom-up’ approach makes sure that watershed
interventions are planned, designed, implemented and monitored by the local community.
3. Integrated approach
Watershed projects must make conscious efforts to recognise the stakes and interests of
small- and large-scale farmers, women and landless labourers at every level, from decision-
making to implementation to project-monitoring. Watershed management programs may
not yield the desired results if the integrated and collective approach is ignored, which
entails the following risks:
5. Ecological conservation
The primary aim of EdelGive’s watershed management programs is the conservation of the
ecosystem and natural resources, and the reversal of the process of climate change and
global warming. Ecological conservation is at the heart of watershed programs, as they
address the root causes of water scarcity and soil degradation. The supplementary projects
of watershed program are forestation programs, horticulture units, drip irrigation methods
and plantations which ensure the sustainability of water programs. Watershed programs
should not be seen in isolation as a practice that merely harnesses agricultural yields,
conserves rainwater or generate livelihoods, but as a holistic process to develop the systems
and practices that enable future generations to enjoy nature in its glorious abundance.
Stakeholders and Partners in Watershed Projects
Founded: 2006
Founder: Anjali Kanitkar
Head: Shraddha Shringarpure
Activities Related to Organisation of Education, Health and Nutrition (AROEHAN) focusses on the
holistic development of tribal communities by working on the issues of health, education, livelihood
and effective governance in the Mokhada area of Thane district of Maharashtra. AROEHAN works in
regions with a peculiar terrain for rainwater harvesting, such as high run offs due to extremely high
rainfall. The undulating and rocky terrain allows little scope for water percolation. Hence,
groundwater reserves are almost empty, and women spend hours walking to fetch their daily
requirement of two pots of water. Water-procurement becomes the most important and time-
consuming daily chore. Water from the wells is also unhygienic, leading to water-borne epidemics.
The Mokhada region has also been notorious for malnutrition deaths. The majority of the population
is dependent on agriculture as their main source of income. Hence, increasing agricultural income is
essential to improving families’ economic status. Similarly, there are many landless households with
seasonal migration, so securing an income for these households through other livelihood options
becomes imperative, in order to reduce migration and mitigate its effects on women and children.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Nashera, Shirasgaon, Adoshi villages of Maharashtra
• Watershed Development Funding: Rs. 2 Crores (2010 – 2016, of which Rs. 52 lakh is for
watershed projectsfrom 2011 – 2016)
• Geography: Water-scarce region
• Main Approach: Check Dams, Drip Irrigation, Building capacity of CBOs, NGOs and local people
Partners of AROEHAN: R. Jhunjhunwala Foundation, Siemens’ Ltd., Oxfam Foundation, Save the
Children, Concern India, BPCL, Tata Motors, All Cargo Logistics, Narottam Seksaria Foundation, Bay
Diligence, Rotary and Lions Clubs et al.
Action for Food Production (AFPRO)
Chhattisgarh
Founded: 1967
Head: Mr. D K Manavalan and Dr. S. Srivastava
AFPRO was established in 1966 as a secular Indian technical service organization. It was registered
(registration No.3516) in 1967 under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860. AFPRO endeavors to
bring together resources of overseas funding agencies, government agencies, financial institutions
and grassroots level NGOs for implementation of developmental projects to improve the quality of
life of weaker sections of the rural community. AFPRO works with and in support of the Government
of India, and for people without regard for caste, creed, race, religion or nationality. AFPRO reaches
out to poor and marginalized communities throughout India, particularly small and marginal farmers
and landless tribals by providing and developing livelihoods through proper natural resource
management. AFPRO works with communities to develop low-cost options for water and sanitation,
food security and rural livelihoods. EdelGiveFoundation supports its water projects in Chhattisgarh.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Kosmi, Tengna, Barpara, Nahanda and Kaparmeta villages of Chhattisgarh
• Watershed Development Funding: Rs. 1.6 Crore (2016 – 2019)
• Geography: water scarce region
• Main Approach: farm ponds, excavation of canals, check dams, ground water resource
estimation for livelihood promotion, formation of farmer groups, exposure visit of farmers.
Partners of AFPRO: Sterlite Technologies, Ultratech, UNICEF, Lafarge India Pvt. Limited, HDFC,
Canadian International Development Agency, International Fund for Agricultural Development,
NABARD, Sir Ratan Tata Trust, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Council for Advancement of
Peoples Action and Rural Technology and many others.
Dilasa Janvikas Pratishthan
Maharashtra
Founded: 1991
Founder: Sanjeev Unhale
Dilasa Janvikas Pratishthan works in the villages of Maharashtra to improve the condition of water,
soil and vegetation along with empowerment of women. Dilasa is a Resource Support Organization
of NABARD in Marathwada under the Indo-German Watershed Development Programme and in
Vidarbha under NABARD’s Holistic Watershed Development Programme. Dilasa has implemented
aquifer management projects in Aurangabad, which is recognized as a landmark concept in
watershed management. Watershed treatments executed include - Farm bunding, Agro
Horticulture, Stone outlets, Grass seeding, Dry land horticulture, Afforestation works - Continuous
Contour Trenches, Earthen Gully Plugs, Drainage Line Treatment, Earthen Nalla Bund, Cement Nalla
Bund, Louse Boulder Structures, Gabions, Women empowerment, training & demonstration, etc.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Jalkotwadi, Manmodi and Aliyabad watersheds in Marathwada region of
Maharashtra
• Watershed Development Funding: Rs. 35 Lakh (2016)
• Geography: Drought prone region
• Main Approach: Earthen nala bunds, loose boulder structures,
Partners of Dilasa Janvikas Pratishthan: NABARD, World Bank, Unicef, KFW-Germany, Mahindra &
Mahindra, United Breweries, ACC Cement, DHFL, CAPART, Johnson & Johnson, Rural development
department of Central & State of Maharashtra and many others.
Gramin Vikas Vigyan Samiti (GRAVIS)
Rajasthan
Founded: 1983
Founders: L. C. and Shashi Tyagi
Head: Dr. Prakash Tyagi
Gramin Vikas Vigyan Samiti (GRAVIS) works in the Thar Desert region of Rajasthan and in
Uttarakhand. The Thar Desert spans over 120,000 square miles, covering the majority of the state of
Rajasthan, and is home to 23 million people, making it the most densely populated desert in the
world. The driest parts experience less than 100 mm of rainfall annually. The fundamental work of
Gravis is the mitigation of drought through watershed programs in the Thar Desert region. Gravis
derives its core principles from Gandhian philosophy of Gram Swaraj, which is village self-rule and
self-sufficiency. Over the last three decades, GRAVIS has done commendable work in developing
watershed models across many villages of Rajasthan.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Dujasar, Kahalaa, Khabia, Jajiya, Meghwalon ki Dhani, Harlaya, Indon ki Dhani,
Bher Bhakhri, Shiv Nagar, Padashla villages of Rajasthan
• Watershed Development Funding: Rs. 97 Lakh (2015 - 2018)
• Geography: Desert / Water scarce region
• Main Approach: Farm pond, Khadin development, Horticulture & Plantations establishment,
De-silting of Naadi, Building capacity of CBOs, NGOs and local people.
Partners of GRAVIS: Canadian International Development Agency, Central Social Welfare Board,
Government of India, Dalyan Foundation, United Nations Development Programme, World Health
Organization, Wells for India, International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas and many
others.
UGAM Gramin Vikas Sanstha
Maharashtra
Founded: 1996
Founder: Jayaji Paikrao
Ugam Gramin Vikas Sanstha works for empowering the most vulnerable sections of the communities
in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra. Ugam believes that the path towards sustainable
development and overcoming economic deprivation is through enhancing livelihood capabilities of
the poor and empowering them through knowledge and skills. Ugam is actively involved in
promotion of environmental and agriculture sustainability through ‘Natural Resource Management’.
Ugam follows an ‘Integrated Rural Development’ approach of working collaboratively on issues of
women, children and youth; creating awareness among the villagers and imparting knowledge and
skills.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Telangwadi, Nimtok, Amdari, Rajdari villages of Maharashtra
• Watershed Development Funding: 1.05 Crores (2015 - 2018)
• Geography: Drought hit and water scarce region
• Main Approach: Shirpur / Dove, Budki Model, Dug well recharge, repairing and Bore well
recharge, Vanrai Bandhara, Check Dams, Farm Ponds etc.
Partners of Ugam: Terre Des Hommes, Japan Consulate, Habitat for Humanity India, Finnish
Society, Institute for Integrated Rural Development, Indian Institute of Science Education and
Research and many others.
UTTHAN
Gujarat
Founded: 1981
Founders: Padma Chowgule, Indu Mishra, Penelope Lane Czarra and Nafisa Barot
Utthan works in the tribal belts and coastal regions of Gujarat among the economically poor and
socially excluded populations, with extremely low health status of women, low education, and high
levels of migration for employment. Its major thrust areas have been: access to safe water and
sanitation as a basic human right; integrating perspective of gender equality and women’s
empowerment; conflict prevention through conflict transformation, peace and justice; and
Livelihood securitythrough protection, conservation and augmentation of natural resources.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Bhamari village of Gujarat
• Watershed Development Funding: Rs. 46 Lakh (2015 - 2017)
• Geography: Drought hit and water scarce region
• Main Approach: Organising communities and women and enhancing their capacities, their
exposures to other farmers groups having best practices, facilitating building of Check dams,
Farm bunds, Gabian structures, Drip Irrigation, Well deepening, etc.
Partners of Utthan: India WASH Forum, NABARD, Indo-German Watershed Development Program,
Water and Sanitation Management Organisation-Swajaldhara Rashtriya Shram Vikas Yojna,
Gender Water Alliance, Global Water Partnership, South Asia Consortium for Interdisciplinary
Waters, Water and Environmental Sanitation Network, Pravah and many others.
Yuva Rural Association
Maharashtra
Founded: 2002
Founder: Dattatray Shankar Patil
Yuva Rural Association (YRA) works to address the rural issues in Western India with its core
existence in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra where YUVA had initiated development
interventions through a network called Vidarbha Lokvikas Manch. At present, YRA works in Natural
Resource Management, Livelihoods, Gender and Governance. YRA works in comparatively backward
regions of Maharashtra which faces numerous problems including farmer's suicides, lack of irrigation
facilities, lack of proper health and education services.
EdelGive Support
• Locations: Bhandarbodi, Wadamba, Mahadula, Panchala, Shivani villages of Maharashtra
• Watershed Development Funding: Rs. 51 Lakh (2016 - 2018)
• Geography: Drought hit and water scarce region
• Main Approach: PHAD structures, Drip Irrigation, Formation of farmers’ groups, exposure
visit of farmers etc.
Partners of YRA: NABARD, Watershed Support Service and Activities Network, VNCS, AME
Foundation, Tribal Development Department, SRTT, Maharashtra State Bio- Diversity Board, Swiss
Aid India, Women and Child Development department. United Nations Development Programme,
UNICEF, NABARD, Watershed Support Service and Activities Network, Swiss Aid India, NACO and
many others.
Glimpses
EdelGive Foundation Supported water projects
2. EdelGive Foundation Annual Reports: 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
(http://www.edelgive.org/resources_reports.php).
3. Joshi PK, Jha AK, Wani SP, Joshi L and Shiyani RL. 2005. Meta-analysis to assess impact of
watershed program and people’s participation. Research Report 8, Comprehensive
Assessment of watershed management in agriculture. International Crops Research Institute
for the Semi-Arid Tropics and Asian Development Bank. 21pp.
4. Joshi PK, Jha AK, Wani SP, Sreedevi TK and Shaheen FA. 2008. Impact of Watershed Program
and Conditions for Success: A Meta-Analysis Approach. Global Theme on Agro ecosystems,
Report 46. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics and National Centre
for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research.
5. Rao, Srinivasa., Lal, Ratan., Prasad, Jasti., Gopinath, Kodigal., Singh, Rajbir., Jakkula,Vijay S
Kanwar., Sahrawat L., Venkateswarlu, Bandi., Sikka, Alok K, and Virmani, Surinder M. 2015.
Potential and Challenges of Rainfed Farming in India. Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press.
pp. 113 -114.
6. Thakare, Parag R., Jadhav, Raj A. and Kumawat Hastimal S. 2013. Watershed Management-A
case study of Satara Tanda Village. International Journal of Innovative Technology and
Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), (3) 3: 2278-3075.
7. Wani SP, Ramakrishna, Sreedevi TK, Long TD, Thawilkal Wangkahart, Shiferaw B, Pathak and
Kesava Rao. 2006. Issues, concepts, approaches and practices in the integrated watershed
management. Experience and lessons from Asia in integrated management of watershed for
agricultural diversification and sustainable livelihoods in Eastern and Central Africa: Lessons
and experiences from Semi-Arid South Asia. Proceedings of the International Workshop held
in December 2004 at Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 17–36.
MicroProjectEvaluationsSheet
Name ofStudent :-Vishal. Ratan Shende
ENROLLMENT NO:- 1815970011
Name ofprogramme:-Civil Engineering
CourseTitle:- Water Resources
Engineering
Semester:-5th
Code:-22501
2. LiteratureReview/
information collection
3. Completionofthe
targetasperprojec
pt
roposal
4. AnalysisofDataan
d representation
5. Qualityofprototype
/ Model
6. ReportPreparation
(B) Individual presentation/Viva(Coverts overtaken armour of
4marks)
7. Presentation
8. Viva
(A) (B)
Process and product Individual Total marks 10th
Assessment(6 Presenta
mar tion/ Viva(4 marks)
ks)
Dated Signature:-