Rock Elect Tric
Rock Elect Tric
Rock Elect Tric
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Usually, in conventional reservoirs, the rock-electric properties can be explained by Archie's law, and the relative
Pore structure permeability is only considered as a function of fluid saturation. However, as for the complex reservoirs, Archie's
Fluid distribution law fails to accurately describe the rock-electric properties and the relative permeability is not only affected by
Wettability saturation, the reason is that both rock-electric and relative permeability characteristics are influenced by multi-
Curved cylinder-sphere model
factors, including the complex pore structure, fluid distribution, and wettability. Currently, there lacks the
Rock-electric characteristics
Relative permeability
theoretical method to comprehensively study the multi-factors effect on rock-electric and relative permeability
characteristics. In this paper, the curved cylinder-sphere model is developed to illustrate the complex pore-throat
structure, fluid distribution, and wettability in real rocks, which can be characterized by two important para-
meters: the ratio Cd of the curved cylinder radius to the sphere radius and the tortuosity τ. Based on the curved
cylinder-sphere model, and by using Ohm's law, one can carry out the research on the effect of pore geometry,
fluid distribution, and wettability on rock-electric characteristics. Moreover, by combining the curved cylinder-
sphere model with Li's model, the effect of pore structure, fluid distribution, and wettability can be incorporated
into the relative permeability calculation model. By means of the numerical simulation and analysis, it comes to
conclusions that pore structure, fluid distribution, and wettability are the principal factors affecting both rock-
electric and relative permeability characteristics, which may cause different formation factor, resistivity index,
and relative permeability even in those reservoirs with the same porosity and fluid saturation. Besides, the study
demonstrates that the complex pore structure, fluid distribution, and wettability may cause the non-Archie
phenomenon of rock-electric characteristics, in addition, the complex pore structure can lead to the decrease of
water relative permeability and the increase of oil relative permeability, and when the rock wettability changes
from water-wet to oil-wet, water relative permeability increases and oil relative permeability decreases.
Furthermore, by the comparison of the simulation results and Lab data, the important effect of complex pore
structure and fluid saturation is confirmed.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.085
Received 17 November 2017; Received in revised form 21 March 2018; Accepted 23 March 2018
Available online 30 March 2018
0920-4105/ © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
applied to multiphase flow in porous media. Burdine (1953) then took saturation and at a specific water saturation of Sw can be derived:
the tortuosity factor into consideration in the model, which is a function
τ 2o
of fluid saturation. By summarizing the previous work, Corey (1954) Ro = Rw
ϕ (1)
and Brooks and Corey (1966) modified the capillary pressure as a
power function of wetting-phase saturation, and proposed a new model
τ t2
to determine the relative permeability, which has been widely used in Rt = Rw
ϕSw (2)
the field. However, capillary pressure is not only hard to measure but
also not practical for field data processing. Li (2005, 2008, 2011) found where τo is the tortuosity at a 100% water saturation, τo = L′/ L , a di-
a relationship between relative permeability and resistivity index from mensionless quantity whose value is always ≥ 1; τt is the tortuosity at a
the analogy between fluid flow and electric flow properties. Pairoys specific water saturation of Sw, τt = l′/ L , a dimensionless quantity
et al. (2013) improved Li's model by considering residual non-wetting whose value is always ≥ 1; Ro and Rt are the resistance of rocks at a
phase saturation. Ma et al. (2015) derived two-phase relative perme- saturation of 100% and a specific saturation Sw, respectively; Rw is the
ability from resistivity by combining Poiseuille's law with Darcy's law resistance of brine; ϕ is rock porosity.
and introducing tortuosity ratio into the model. Ge (2015) predicted the According to Archie's law, the resistivity index can be written as:
relative permeability based on theory of coupled electricity-seepage
τ t2 1
and capillary bundle model. However, few work is conducted to study I=
and model the important effect of pore structure, fluid distribution, and τ 2o Sw (3)
wettability on the relative permeability. For rocks with simple pore structure, both τo and τt take the value of
In this work, the objective of the study is to study the effect of pore 1, then the resistivity index becomes:
structure, fluid distribution, and wettability on the rock-electric and
1
relative permeability characteristics in two-phase flow medium (water I=
is wetting phase, and oil is non-wetting phase). A curved cylinder- Sw (4)
sphere model is proposed to describe the complex pore-throat structure, Eq. (4) is considered as the simplest form of Archie's law, which can
fluid distribution, and wettability properties, which is described by two be used to describe the resistivity index property of the simple capillary
parameters: the tortuosity and the ratio of curved cylinder radius to model, while it can't illustrate the complex pore structure.
sphere radius. By the comparison of the simulation results and the ex- Li (2008) found a relationship between relative permeability and
perimental data, it shows that the formation factor and the resistivity resistivity index from the analogy between fluid flow and electric flow
index are greatly affected by pore structure, fluid distribution, and properties. Li's model is expressed as:
wettability, and the theoretical results are in good agreement with ex-
1
perimental data, besides, by considering the complex pore structure, Krw = Sw∗
I (5)
fluid distribution, and wettability, the non-Archie phenomenon can be
interpreted. Furthermore, by combining the curved cylinder-sphere Sw − Swi
Sw∗ =
model with Li's model, the pore structure parameters can be introduced 1 − Swi (6)
into the relative permeability model, and the modified model can be
used to model and explain the effect of the complex pore-throat where Sw∗
is normalized saturation, dimensionless unit, Sw is the wet-
structure, fluid distribution, and wettability on the relative perme- ting phase saturation, dimensionless unit, and Swi is the irreducible
ability. saturation of the wetting phase, dimensionless unit.
Substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (5), the relative permeability is ex-
pressed as:
2. Resistivity index and relative permeability in rocks with simple
pore structure τ 2o ∗
Krw = Sw S w
τ t2 (7)
In real reservoirs, pore structure is very complex. However, for the
sake of simplicity, pore model should be simplified to illustrate the pore Burdine (1953) gave an empirical expression of tortuosity ratio,
structure. which is a function of wetting phase saturation:
Usually, reservoir rock is simplified into a unit volume cylinder, and τo S − Swi
= w = Sw∗
pore structure is simplified as a curved cylindrical pore containing oil- τt 1 − Swi (8)
water two-phase flow, as shown in Fig. 1, A is the apparent cross-sec-
Substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (7) yields the relative permeability:
tion area of rock, and is equal to 1.0, L is the length of rock, and equals
1.0; Aw is the apparent cross-section area of effective water flow Krw = Sw∗3 Sw (9)
pathway, l′ is the length of the tortuous water flow pathway and L′ is
the length of the tortuous cylindrical pore. Based on Archie's law Note that the derived Eq. (9) is similar to the semi-empirical relative
(Archie, 1942; Cai et al., 2017), the resistance of rock at a 100% water permeability model proposed by Corey (1954), and the relative per-
meability can be easily inferred from water saturation, but it only
contains the effect of fluid saturation, which is not suitable for complex
reservoir rocks.
Here a real reservoir rock is still simplified into a unit volume cy-
linder with a cross-section area of 1.0 and a length of 1.0, however, the
complex pore structure is considered as a curved cylinder-sphere
model, which is composed of sphere pore and curved cylinder pore, and
Fig. 1. The oil-bearing curved cylinder model. the pore space is fully saturated with water, as shown in Fig. 2. The pore
892
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
structure is described by two parameters: the tortuosity and the curved Fig. 3. Comparison of lab data and simulation results on formation factors, the
cylinder-sphere radius ratio. The tortuosity and the curved cylinder- tortuosity τ = 1.0.
sphere radius ratio Cd are defined as (Johnson and Schwartz, 1989;
Epstein, 1989; Shang et al., 2003; Liu and Tang, 2013):
L′
τ=
L (10)
Rc
Cd =
Rs (11)
where L′ is the effective length of the curved cylinder, L is the straight-
1
line length of the curved cylinder, L = 2 − Rs2 − Rc2 , Rc is the curved
cylinder radius (R c ≤ Rs ), Rs is the sphere radius ( πRs2 < 1 , Rs < 1/ π
), and it is easily found out that 0 < Cd ≤ 1.
As shown in Fig. 2, the volume V of the curved cylinder-sphere
model is divided into two parts: the curved cylinder volume Vc and the
sphere volume Vs without spherical crowns, thus, the pore space vo-
lume V is the volume sum of two parts. Due to the unit volume rock,
porosity ϕ is equal to the pore volume V:
Fig. 4. Comparison of lab data and simulation results on formation factors, the
Rs2 − Rc2 tortuosity τ = 1.25.
ϕ = V = Vs + Vc = 2 ∫ Ss (r ) dr + 2Sc L′
0 (12)
where Ss (r ) and Sc are the cross-section area of the sphere and the
curved cylinder, respectively, Ss (r ) = π (Rs2 − r 2) , Sc = πRc2 . Thus, the
porosity ϕ can be solved as:
2π 3 1
ϕ= Rs 1 − Cd2 (2 + Cd2) + 2πτRs2 Cd2 ⎛ − Rs 1 − Cd2 ⎞
3 ⎝2 ⎠ (13)
Similarly, the resistance of reservoir rock Ro can be expressed as the
sum of the resistance of the curved cylinder part and sphere part.
According to Ohm's law and Archie law, the formation factor F can be
obtained by:
Rs2 − Rc2
R L′ 2dr Lτ 2dr
F= o =
Rw Sc
+ ∫ Ss (r )
=
πRc2
+ ∫ π (Rs2 − r 2)
0
893
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
Fig. 7. Comparison of simulation results and lab data on the resistivity index I,
characteristics of classic Archie law. By the comparison of the simula-
the tortuosity τ = 1.0.
tion results and Lab data, it comes to the conclusion that the simulation
results are in good agreement with lab data by considering the complex
rs2− rc2
pore structure. (1 − 2Rs 1 − Cd2 ) τ 2dr
In addition, the increase of tortuosity also leads to more complex Ft =
π (Rc2 − rc2)
+ ∫ π (Rs2 − r 2) − π (rs2 − r 2)
0
pore structure, Figs. 4 and 5 show that the increasing tortuosity in-
Rs2 − Rc2
creases formation factor F and the nonlinear degree of the F − ϕ re- 2dr (1 − 2Rs 1 − Cd2 ) τ
lationship, it proves that the complex pore structure is critical for the + ∫ π (Rs2 2
− r 2) − πrc
=
π (Rs2 Cd2 − rs2 Cdo
2
)
study of rock-electric properties, which can cause the non-Archie phe- rs2− rc2
894
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
Fig. 10. The resistance changes of sphere part with the tortuosity τ.
Fig. 8. Comparison of simulation results and lab data on the resistivity index I,
ϕ = 0.25, Cd = 0.45, Cdo = 0.50.
895
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
Fig. 12. The changes of relative permeability under different pore structure
parameter Cd and tortuosity τ, Cd = 0.50.
1
Relative Permeability, fraction
0.8
0
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1
Cylinder-Sphere Radius Ratio Cdo of Oil, fraction
Fig. 13. The changes of relative permeability under different pore structure
parameter Cd and oil bead structure parameter Cdo, τ = 1.0. Fig. 16. Spectrogram of water relative permeability Krw, Cd = 0.50.
896
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
The study shows that there is a water film or oil film with a thick-
comparison of Figs. 14–17, one can clearly understand the effect of both
ness of h on the pore surface of water-wet or oil-wet rock, as shown in
the fluid saturation and the fluid distribution on the relative perme-
Fig. 6. Hirasaki (1991) pointed out that the wetting degree is closely
ability. By the comparison among these figures, it is easily found that
related to the thickness of water or oil film in the oil-water-rock system.
water relative permeability increases and oil relative permeability de-
Under the water-wet condition, suppose that there exists a thin layer
creases with the increase of Cdo and water saturation Sw , even though
of water film on the pore surface, which provides the conductive
Cdo is small, water relative permeability is still high at high water sa-
channel and increases the irreducible water saturation, the average
turation.
thickness of water film is denoted as h . It is easily found that the gen-
Also, when porosity is constant and Cd decreases from 0.5 to 0.25,
eralized formation factor Ft is identical to Eq. (17), however, the range
the range of cylinder pore radius rc decreases by nearly half, while the
of rc and rs change, rc ranges from 0 to R c − h , and rs ranges from 0 to
range of sphere pore radius rs is almost unchanged, as shown in Figs. 18
Rs − h .
and 19. Moreover, by the comparison between Figs. 16 and 18, when
Similarly, under the oil-wet condition, there exists a thin layer of oil
both water saturation and oil bead structure remain constant, such as
film on the pore surface, which increases the residual oil saturation and
rs = 0.2, rc = 0.1, it is obvious that water relative permeability in Fig. 18
decreases the effective cross-sectional area of water path, the average
is less than that in Fig. 16, thus, due to the pore structure difference, the
thickness of water film is also denoted as h . Besides, R c is replaced by
relative permeability may be different in those reservoirs with the same
R c − h , and Rs is replaced by Rs − h . The generalized formation factor
porosity and fluid saturation.
Ft can be rewritten as:
rs2− rc2 (R s − h)2 − (R c − h)2
5. The effect of wettability on rock-electric and relative Rt 2dr 2dr
permeability characteristics based on the curved cylinder-sphere
Ft =
Rw
= ∫ Ss − Sso
+ ∫ Ss − Sco
0 rs2− rc2
model 1
2
2dr
In fact, besides the pore structure and fluid distribution, the wett- + ∫ Sc − Sco
ability is also related to the non-Archie phenomenon and relative per- (R s − h)2 − (R c − h)2 (23)
meability results. In the following research, the effect of wettability on Using the same method stated above, by combining with Li's model,
rock-electric and relative permeability characteristics is discussed and the effect of wettability on the relative permeability also can be studied.
analyzed. In order to model the rock-electric and relative permeability char-
acteristics in different wetting conditions, the average thicknesses of
water film and oil film are set to 0.0041 and 0.0205, respectively. The
rock-electric and relative permeability characteristics in water-wet and
oil-wet conditions are depicted in Figs. 20 and 21.
Many scholars have conducted a lot of experimental research and
theoretical analysis on the influence of wettability on the conductivity
of rocks. In oil wet rocks, with the decrease of water saturation, re-
sistivity index increased; in water wet rocks, a layer of water film forms
on the surface of pore, which provides an additional current channel
and increases the content of bound water. Therefore, under the same
water saturation, the resistivity index of oil wet rocks is significantly
higher than that of water wet rocks, as shown in Fig. 20, besides, Fig. 20
also shows that the change of wettability leads to the nonlinear change
of the I − Sw relationship, which means that the rock wettability also
can cause the non-Archie phenomenon; furthermore, the wettability
will also affect the relative permeability characteristics of oil-water
two-phase flow, when the rock wettability changes from oil wet to
water wet, oil relative permeability tends to increase, water relative
Fig. 18. Spectrogram of water relative permeability Krw, Cd = 0.25. permeability tends to decrease, and the isoperm point in the relative
897
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
Fig. 20. The changes of resistivity index in water-wet and oil-wet conditions. Fig. 22. Relative permeability calculated from Li model and new model. in
Boise sandstone ( ϕ = 0.32) at a temperature of 300 °F.
Fig. 21. The changes of relative permeability in water-wet and oil-wet condi-
tions.
Fig. 23. Relative permeability calculated from Li model and new model. in
Berea sandstone ( ϕ = 0.204) at a temperature of 300 °F.
permeability curve moves to the right, these characteristics are shown
in Fig. 21. Generally, the rock-electric and relative permeability char-
acteristics in water-wet and oil-wet conditions simulated by this model
are consistent with previous experimental results.
898
H. Meng Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 166 (2018) 891–899
899