Structural Design of Railways and Pavements Group 5
Structural Design of Railways and Pavements Group 5
Structural Design of Railways and Pavements Group 5
and Pavements
Bridge Deck- portion of a railway bridge that supplies a means of carrying the
track rails.
Ballasted Bridge
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
A structural design project may be divided into three phases, i.e. planning,
design and construction.
The geometric design of a railway track includes all those parameters which
determine or affect the geometry of the track. These parameters are as follows.
1. Gradients in the track, including grade compensation, rising gradient, and
falling gradient.
Gradients are provided to negotiate the rise or fall in the level of the railway
track.
∙ A rising gradient is one in which the track rises in the direction of the
movement of traffic and a down or falling gradient is one in which the
track loses elevation in the direction of the movement of traffic.
∙ A gradient is normally represented by the distance travelled for a rise or
fall of one unit.
∙ Sometimes the gradient is indicated as per cent rise or fall. For example, if
there is a rise of 1 m in 400 m, the gradient is 1 in 400 or 0.25%.
(b) Pusher or helper gradient - When the gradient of the ensuing section is so
steep as to necessitate the use of an extra engine for pushing the train, it is
known as a pusher or helper gradient.
(c) Momentum gradient - is steeper than the ruling gradient and can be
overcome by a train because of the momentum it gathers while running on the
section.
(d) Gradients in station yards - are quite flat due to the following reasons.
∙ To prevent standing vehicles from rolling and moving away from the yard
due to the combined effect of gravity and strong winds.
∙ To reduce the additional resistive forces required to start a locomotive to
the extent possible.
(a) On BG tracks, 0.04% per degree of the curve or 70/R, whichever is minimum
Example: Find the steepest gradient on a 2° curve for a BG line with a ruling
gradient of 1 in 200.
Solution
Requirements of a pavement
• Sufficient thickness to distribute the wheel load stresses to a safe value on the
sub-grade soil,
2. Surface Texture
∙ fine-textured soils-soils consisting mainly of silts and clays with very small
particle sizes.
∙ coarse-textured soils-soils consisting mainly of sands and gravel with much
larger particles.
VI. SPECIAL SOIL TESTS FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN-The results obtained from these
tests are used individually in the design of some pavements, depending on
the pavement design method used.
Load
• Conventional layered flexible pavement- are layered systems with high quality
expensive materials are placed in the top where stresses are high, and low
quality cheap materials are placed in lower layers.
• Seal coat- is a thin surface treatment used to water-proof the surface and to
provide skid resistance.
• Binder course- This layer provides the bulk of the asphalt concrete structure. Its
chief purpose is to distribute load to the base course.
• Sub-base course- is the layer of material beneath the base course and the
primary functions are to provide structural support, improve drainage, and
reduce the intrusion of fines from the sub-grade in the pavement structure.
• Top soil or sub-grade- is a layer of natural soil prepared to receive the stresses
from the layers above. It is essential that at no time soil sub-grade is
overstressed.
Failure of flexible pavements- The major flexible pavement failures are fatigue
cracking, rutting, and thermal cracking. The fatigue cracking of flexible
pavement is due to horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the asphaltic
concrete.
Rigid pavements- have sufficient flexural strength to transmit the wheel load
stresses to a wider area below.
Traditionally fatigue cracking has been considered as the major, or only criterion
for rigid pavement design. The allowable number of load repetitions to cause
fatigue cracking depends on the stress ratio between flexural tensile stress and
concrete modulus of rupture.
AASHTO Design Method- The AASHTO method for design of highway pavements
is based primarily on the results of the AASHTO road test that was conducted in
Ottawa, Illinois.
Design Considerations
The factors considered in the AASHTO procedure for the design of flexible
pavement as presented in the 1993 guide are:
• Pavement performance
• Traffic
• Materials of construction
• Environment
• Drainage
•Reliability
A general equation for the accumulated ESAL for each category of axle load is
obtained as
ESALi = equivalent accumulated 18,000lb (80 kN) single-axle load for the axle category
Grn = growth factor for a given growth rate r and design period n
AADTi = first year annual average daily traffic for axle category i
The objective of the design using the AASHTO method is to determine a flexible
pavement Structural Number (SN) adequate to carry the projected design
ESAL.
1. Link
a. https://www.arema.org/files/pubs/pgre/PGChapter8.pdf b.
https://www.teachengineering.org/lessons/view/cub_brid_lesson02 c.
https://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/tvm/1100_LnTse/401_lnTse/plain/plain.html d.
http://www.orsc.co.jp/english/tec/con08_4.html#:~:text=Prestressed%2
0concrete%20pavements%20are%20designed,their%20relatively
%20thi nner%20thickness%20design
e. https://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/~vmtom/1100_LnTse/403_lnTse/plain/