Feedback.p 1227325482
Feedback.p 1227325482
Feedback.p 1227325482
2. Analyse the elements and the sources of brand equity and be able to
identify patterns of managing and sustaining brand strategy.
Assessment Method
You will be assessed by an individual ref lective report (40%), which will be based on a group presentation.
The f irst assessment relates to the identif ication, description and evaluation of the marketing strategies used by a company of your
choice to create competitive advantage. The group presentation is a f ormative assessment and will be f ollowed by a ref lective
statement analysing your contribution, the overall team ef f ectiveness f or achieving the task .
Task 1a Presentation (Weighted at 0% formative assessment – from which you will receive feedback)
Competitive Analysis and Comparative Advantage
You and your fellow team members (maximum 5 members, minimum 3) work for Interbrand, which is a major brand and
strategy organisation. You are interns and you are also ambitious. They have asked you to choose one of the following:
2.) Waitrose
4.) Lidl
6.) Thorntons
7.) BodyShop
9.) Airbnb
11.) Spotif y
Group Task:
Conduct a brief analysis and evaluate the competitive positioning of your chosen brand in its market.
Suggested structure and key areas include:
- Introduction
- Market analysis, identifying the key trends and the nature of competition
- Key competitors and their market share
- Core marketing strategy of the key competitors
- Points of differentiation of the key competitors
- Competitive positioning of your chosen brand
- The competitive advantage of your chosen brand
- Suggestions/recommendations for your chosen brand based on its competitive advantage
Requirements:
A set of PowerPoint slides, bullet points, diagrams, graphs, figures, etc.:
The Presentation should last f or 20 minutes, f ollowed by a 10 minute Q&A session led by your tutor(s).
2
*Feedback will be given at the end of the group presentation. It is important that you / group members note / record the f eedb ack.
This will help you recall the points more clearly and deeply.
Submission
We do not need paper copies submitted, just an e-copy, which needs to be submitted via the link on Breo.
The unit focuses on the analysis of competitive marketing and brand management strategies at national and international level s.
Current Research and Thinking: Your tutors are research active. This suggests that, as it is expected from Master’s level stu dents, you will be
guided through the latest developments of the literature and you will learn to think as researchers yourself. Developing this way of thought
will equip you with a number of skills which will prove very useful during the rest of your studi es but most importantly when you enter the
workplace.
The unit will equip you with knowledge related to ethical, legal and cultural issues and their development in different socia l and
technological contexts. You will familiarise yourself with different e thical and legal standards applied in the industry.
3
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page .
You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
3rd Class – 40-49% Lower 2nd – 50-59% Upper 2nd – 60-69% 1st Class – 70%+
SATISFACTORY... CONTENT / GOOD... MARKETING
LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXCELLENT...
INSIGHT & APPLICATION. VERY GOOD... MARKETING
TOPIC. ADDRESSES PART OF MARKETING INSIGHT &
DEMONSTRATING BREADTH, DEPTH & INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
THE TASK. SOME ERRORS / APPLICATION.
A CLEAR INTEGRATION OF BREADTH, DEPTH &
OMISSIONS IN CONTENT/ BREADTH, DEPTH &
LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTEGRATION OF
UNDERSTANDING THEORY. INTO WORK IS LITERATURE/EXAMPLES
INTEGRATION OF
OF THE SUBJECT INCONSISTENT APPLICATION OF LITERATURE/EXAMPLES
APPROPRIATE TO THE INTO WORK IS ABOVE
SOME CORRECT INTO WORK IS
(25%) CONTEXT AND ATTEMPTS AVERAGE.
THEORY/PRINCIPLES/CONCEPTS IMPRESSIVE.
TO BE CONSISTENT.
EXCELLENT... LEVEL OF
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/
CRITICAL EVALUATION
GOOD... LEVEL OF VERY GOOD... LEVEL OF &/OR REFLECTION
MARKETING SATISFACTORY... MARKETING DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ CLEARLY DEVELOPING
CRITICAL EVALUATION CRITICAL EVALUATION POINTS IN THE
APPLICATION INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
&/OR REFLECTION BUT &/OR REFLECTION & A FEW APPROPRIATE WAY WITH
AND BREADTH, DEPTH &
MORE IDEAS/POINTS IDEAS/POINTS COULD THOROUGH
INTEGRATION OF INTEGRATION OF CONSIDERATION OF ALL
COULD BE ADDRESSED BENEFIT FROM FURTHER
LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTO POSSIBILITIES.
LITERATURE WORK IS APPROPRIATE, BUT /DEVELOPED FURTHER. DEVELOPMENT &/OR
EVALUATION/COMPARISON.
(30%) NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLIED.
THE BEST WORK WILL BE
HIGHLY DEVELOPED AND
FOCUSED AND
ATTEMPTS A HOLISTIC
TREATMENT OF THE
TASK/PROBLEM.
SATISFACTORY... BASIC GOOD…INSIGHT &
EXCELLENT...
DISCUSSION EVIDENCE OF APPLICATION. VERY GOOD... MARKETING
MARKETING INSIGHT &
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ BREADTH, DEPTH & INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
/ANALYSIS APPLICATION.
CRITICAL EVALUATION &/OR INTEGRATION OF BREADTH, DEPTH &
/CRITICAL BREADTH, DEPTH &
REFLECTION BUT SOME POINTS LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTEGRATION OF
EVALUATION INTEGRATION OF
SUPERFICIALLY MADE SO NEED INTO WORK IS LITERATURE/EXAMPLES
LITERATURE/EXAMPLES
&/OR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. APPROPRIATE TO THE INTO WORK IS ABOVE
INTO WORK IS
REFLECTION LIMITED CRITICAL EVALUATION CONTEXT AND ATTEMPTS AVERAGE.
IMPRESSIVE.
(MAINLY DESCRIPTIVE) TO BE CONSISTENT.
(30%)