Final
Final
Final
Composite Column
By
Ajay Gelot
(16MCLC08)
Major Project
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
(Computer Aided Structural Analysis And Design)
By
Ajay Gelot
(16MCLC08)
Under the Guidance of
Dr. Sharad Purohit
a) The major project comprises of my original work towards the Degree of Master of
Technology in Civil Engineering (Computer Aided Structural Analysis and Design) at
Nirma University and has not been submitted elsewhere for a degree.
b) Due acknowledgment has been made in text to all other material used.
Ajay Gelot
Certificate
This is to certify that Major Project entitled “Development of Interaction Curve
for Composite Column” submitted by Ajay Gelot (16MCLC08),towards the partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Technology in Civil Engineering
(Computer Aided Structural Analysis and Design) of Nirma University, Ahmedabad is
the record of work carried out by him under my supervision and guidance. In my opinion,
the submitted work has reached a level required for being accepted for examination. The
results embodied in this thesis, to the best of my knowledge, haven’t been submitted to
any other university or institution for award of any degree or diploma.
First of all, I would like to thank my Guide Dr. Sharad P. Purohit, Professor, De-
partment of Civil Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University. He has always
been supportive for my dissertation work. Also, his excellent knowledge has guided me
to fundamentally understand the several aspects of the project work.
Also, I would like to thank Prof. Arth Patel, Department of Civil Engineering, In-
stitute of Technology, Nirma University, for guiding me in making the computer program.
His past experience in computer programming really helped me in simplifying the pro-
gram.
Further, I would like to thank Dr. Paresh Patel, Head, Department of Civil Engineer-
ing, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, and also Dr. Alka Mahajan, Director,
Institute of Technology, Nirma University, for providing all the required resources for the
project work.
Also, I would like to thank Dr. Vikas Lakhera, Head, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, for allowing me to use several
sophisticated instruments in workshop.
Also, I would like to thank Mr. Jayesh Patel, Assistant, Central workshop, for help-
ing me in making the Grooves on steel plates. Also I am thankful to Jashvant Sir for
teaching me to do a proper welding and cutting. And all the other Laboratory assistant
in workshop for showing their humble support and guidance in the Workshop.
Last but not the least, I am Sincerely thankful to all of my classmate for supporting
and motivating me.
Ajay Gelot
(16MCLC08)
Abstract
Composite Columns like Concrete Filled Tube, Concrete Encased Steel Section and Con-
crete Encased and Filled Steel Tube Section are most widely adopted, worldwide, in Tall
Buildings and Heavy Structures. These Sections are primarily designed for axial load due
to gravity and uniaxial/bi-axial moments. Realizing complexity in analytical solution
for column design, mostly they are designed using force-moment (P-M) interaction curve
given by various codes like Eurocode-4, AISC-2010, ACI-381-05, and AIJ-2001. Amongst
all the design codes, Eurocode-4 and AISC-2010 provides a most simplified method for the
development of P-M interaction curve that can be used for composite column design. In
India, use of composite column is quite limited and when used design of complete column
is carried out by other country’s code, as no dedicated Indian Standard code is available
till date. Thus, design engineers practice in India do not have P-M interaction curve
for steel section available in Indian market. Therefore, there is a need to develop P-M
interaction curve for steel section pertaining to Indian market using simplified method as
described in Eurocode-4.
In the major project work, P-M interaction curves for different types of composite column
sections like Rectangular circular Concrete Filled Tube, Rectangular Circular Full Con-
crete Encased Steel Section and Rectangular Circular Concrete Encased and Filled Steel
Tube are developed through computer programming in Visual Basics-2012. The Com-
puter Program is developed using Eurocode EN 1994-1-1:2004, where in plastic stress
axis moves across the cross-section of the composite column. P-M interaction curve is de-
veloped by determining plastic axial load resistance and plastic moment resistance with
reference to plastic stress axis. Check for safety and stability of the composite column is
an integral part of the program developed. Program is also capable to generate design
report for composite column design and stability against local buckling. The project work
also includes experimental investigation on behavior of medium Circular Square Concrete
Filled Tube subjected to Axial (P) and Eccentric (P-M) loading. Ten numbers of test
specimens, five each of Circular and Square Concrete Filled Tube, are prepared for the
Axial and Eccentric loading. Test specimen with Eccentricities of 10 mm, 20 mm, 30 mm,
and 35 mm are fabricated for the testing. It has been found that all specimens shows
failure mode as Buckling. Wherein outer fiber of composite column shows Tension, while
other side of composite column shows compression and hence undergoes local buckling.
Apart, comparison among experimental values of P-M curve and analytical values, for-
mer yields higher P-M values which are 34% and 15% higher as compared to analytical
solution respectively. A slenderness effect on composite columns is also investigated. Two
numbers of test specimens for medium and slender composite column are also prepared
and tested under pure axial gravity loading, while slender column shows predominantly
buckling behavior, medium column shows a bulging failure.
xiii
Declaration v
Certificate vii
Acknowledgement ix
Abstract xi
Contents xix
1 Introduction 1
1.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.1 Composite Beam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.2 Composite Slab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1.3 Composite Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Need of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3 Objective of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4 Scope of the Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.5 Layout of the Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2 Literature Survey 9
2.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Design Philosophies for Composite Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3 Experimental Behaviour of Composite Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
xv
CONTENTS xvi
3.3 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
References 263
2.1 Details of Specimen with Studs, Wire Mesh , and Cross Ties. . . . . . . . . 10
2.2 Compression Load-Shortening Curve of 300 mm Column . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3 Compression Load-Shortening Curve of 600 mm Column . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.4 Compression Load-Shortening Curve of 900 mm Column . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5 Details of Test Specimens. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.6 Failure Modes of the Specimen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.7 Axial Load-Displacement, Non-Greased and Greased, 30 MPa Concrete . . 16
2.8 Axial Load-Displacement, Non-Greased and Greased, 85 MPa Concrete . . 17
xxi
LIST OF FIGURES xxii
7.31 Interaction Curve of Circular Concrete Encased Steel Column with respect
to X-Axis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
7.32 Interaction Curve of Circular Concrete Encased Steel Column with respect
to Y-Axis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
7.33 Check for Inequality ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
10.25Rupture of Steel Tube and Crushing of Concrete under Axial Load . . . . 229
10.26Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Interaction Curve for Circular
CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
10.27Failure mode of Circular CFT for various Eccentricity of Loading . . . . . 231
10.28Dimension of Tensile Test Coupon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
10.29Cup and Cone Failure of the Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
10.30Stress Strain Curve of Tensile Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
10.31Arrangement of Strain Gauges and LVDT on Square CFT subjected to
Eccentric Loading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
10.32Experimental Test Setup for Square CFT subjected to Eccentric Loading . 234
10.33Axial Strain on Face , B, of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
10.34Horizontal Strain on Face , A, of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
10.35Axial Strain on Face , D, of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
10.36Axial Displacement of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
10.37Central Displacement on Face, B, of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
10.38Top Displacement on Face, B, of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
10.39Bottom Displacement on Face, B, of Square CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
10.40Behaviour of Square CFT under Eccentric Loading . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
10.41Tensile Cracks on Infilled Concrete on Face B of Specimen . . . . . . . . . 239
10.42Crushing of Infilled Concrete on Face D of Specimen . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
10.43Attachment of Concrete with the Steel Tube at the Local Buckling Region. 240
10.44Test Setup for Square CFT subjected to Axial Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
10.45Experimental Test Setup for Square CFT under Axial Load . . . . . . . . 241
10.46Axial Displacement of Circular CFT under Axial Load . . . . . . . . . . . 242
10.47Displacement at Top, Center, and Bottom Height on Face B . . . . . . . . 242
10.48Strain on Various Faces of specimen under Axial Load . . . . . . . . . . . 243
10.49Failure mode of Square CFT under Axial Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
10.50Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Interaction Curve for Square
CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
10.51Failure mode of Square CFT for Various Eccentricity of Loading . . . . . 245
10.52Load-Strain results for Specimen-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
10.53Load-Strain results for Specimen-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
10.54Load-Displacement results for Specimen-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
10.55Load-Displacement results for Specimen-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
10.56Load-Axial Displacement results for Specimen-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
10.57Load-Axial Displacement results for Specimen-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
10.58Failure Mode of Medium Circular CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
10.59Location of Strain Guage and LVDT for Slender Circular CFT . . . . . . . 251
10.60Experimental Setup for Slender Circular CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
10.61Load-Strain results for Specimen-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
10.62Load-Strain results for Specimen-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
10.63Load-Displacement results for Specimen-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
10.64Load-Displacement results for Specimen-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
10.65Load-Axial Displacement results for Specimen-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
10.66Load-Axial Displacement results for Specimen-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
10.67Failure Mode of Slender Circular CFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
10.68Failure Mode of Both Medium and Slender Circular CFT . . . . . . . . . . 257
List of Tables
xxvii
LIST OF TABLES xxviii
Introduction
1.1 General
When two or more materials are used together in one member then it is called composite
element. The main advantage of composite element is that the properties of each individ-
ual member can be combined to form a single unit that performs better overall than its
separate constituents parts. The most common form of composite element in construction
is a steel-concrete composite.
As a material concrete works well in compression, but it has less resistant in tension.
Steel, However, is very strong in Tension, even when it is used in a relatively small
amounts. Steel- Concrete Composite element use concrete’s compressive strength along-
side steel’s resistance to tension, and when tied together this results in a highly efficient
unit that is commonly used for structures such as multistory buildings and bridges.
Composite structural elements include the composite beam, composite slab, and com-
posite column. Together this structural system is very efficient.
Now Steel beam and Concrete Slab can be connected using the natural bond or any
Mechanical devices like Studs. Through This bond horizontal shear is transferred from
Concrete slab to Steel beam. If Bonding is not properly provided then slip will occur
between slab and steel beam. Figure 1.1 shows the composite beams with natural bond
1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 2
between steel beam and concrete and Figure 1.2 shows the steel beam connected to con-
crete with the help of studs.
Steel beam can be connected to the concrete by providing full shear connection and partial
shear connection. When strain profiles is continuous between two beams hence when slip
between the two beams is zero then it is said to be connected using full shear connection,
as shown in Figure 1.3 When strain profile is not continuous between two beams hence
there will be some slip between the two beams then it is said to be connected using partial
shear connection, as shown in Figure 1.4.
• Keeping the span and loading unaltered; a more economical steel section (in terms
of depth and weight) can be achieved in composite construction compared with
conventional non-composite construction.
• As the depth of beam reduces, the construction depth reduces, resulting in enhanced
headroom.
• Because of its larger stiffness, composite beams have less deflection than steel beams.
• Composite construction provides efficient arrangement to cover large column free
space.
• Composite construction is amenable to “fast-track” construction because of using
rolled steel and pre-fabricated components, rather than cast-in-situ concrete.
• Encased steel beam sections have improved fire resistance and corrosion.
Recently, Composite slab form of deck sheet has become very popular in practical use.
Such type of concrete floor is used when concrete floor has to be finish quickly and where
medium level of fire protection to steel work is sufficient. However Composite slab with
deck sheeting is unsuitable where heavy concentrated loading and dynamic loading such
as in bridge.The alternative composite floor in such cases consists of reinforced or pre-
stressed slab over steel beams connected together to act monolithically.
Figure 1.5, shows the composite slab with profiled deck sheet . This metal deck should be
able to resist actions due to wet concrete and other construction instruments. Metal deck
sheet initially supports the wet concrete hence no extra form-work is required to compos-
ite beam. When concrete gets hardened it will acts as a tensile reinforcement. This metal
sheet is generally laid transverse to the beam. Also, it is connected to the beam with
the help of studs at their edge. Generally Metal deck sheet provides more than required
tensile reinforcement to the concrete. Also it is economical in terms of consumption of
concrete and moreover it expedite the construction.
• It develops adequate composite action with concrete to resist the imposed loading.
• It stabilizes the compression flanges of the beams against lateral buckling, until
concrete hardens.
• Greater stiffness of composite beams results in shallower depths for the same span.
Hence lower storey heights are adequate resulting in savings in cladding costs, re-
duction in wind loading and savings in foundation costs.
In a composite column both the steel and concrete would resist the external loading
by interacting together by bond and friction. Supplementary reinforcement in the con-
crete encasement prevents excessive spalling of concrete both under normal load and fire
conditions.In composite construction, the bare steel sections support the initial construc-
tion loads, including the weight of structure during construction. Concrete is later cast
around the steel section, or filled inside the tubular sections. The concrete and steel are
combined in such a fashion that the advantages of both the materials are utilized effec-
tively in composite column. The lighter weight and higher strength of steel permit the
use of smaller and lighter foundations.
Several types of composite column is being used for the composite construction. Cir-
cular Concrete Filled Tube(CFT) is widely used composite column. Concrete is generally
filled in the hollow section hence no additional formwork is required for the construction.
Figure 1.6 shows the several type of composite column. Concrete Filled Tube may or may
not be provided with the longitudinal reinforcement. Generally this longitudinal rein-
forcement plays a vital role when such column is exposed to the fire. Also Fully concrete
encased steel section type composite column eliminates the buckling of steel section hence
more efficiently steel section can be utilized. Also Steel section is completely surrounded
by the concrete hence it also shows the good performance when it is subjected to the fire.
Nowadays, Concrete Encased and Filled Steel Tube is being used as a composite column.
In which concrete is filled inside the hollow tube and also steel tube is completely encased
in the concrete as shown in Figure 1.6. This section again shows good performance when
it is subjected to the fire.
• Identical cross sections with different load and moment resistances can be produced
by varying steel thickness, the concrete strength and reinforcement. This allows
the outer dimensions of a column to be held constant over a number of floors in a
building, thus simplifying the construction and architectural detailing.
When Composite Column is subjected to Axial load as well as bending moment, In-
teraction Curve becomes necessary to design it. Further, In Steel Framed Structure, it
is advisable to encased the steel section in concrete to protect it against the fire. Hence
to design such a Concrete Encased Steel Section it is necessary to have a Interaction Curve.
Initially EN 1994-1-1(2004) has given the simplified method to plot the Interaction Curve
for Composite Column. Moreover, In India a dedicated code is not available to design
Composite Column so one has to depend on EN 1994-1-1(2004) to design a composite
column.
7 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
• Also, To understand behavior of composite column under axial load & uniaxial
bending.
d. Derive mathematical formulation to plot Interaction curve for various Composite Col-
umn Like Rectangular, Square, and Circular Concrete Filled Tube, with or without
longitudinal reinforcement, Fully Concrete Encased Steel Section, Concrete Encased
and Filled tubular column, which can be easily constructed based on the availability
of section in Indian context.
e. Develop Computer Program using Visual Basics 2012 for development of Interaction
Curve and to produce design report.
Chapter 2, includes literature review which contains details related to the advance-
ment in composite structural element.
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 8
Chapter 4, include the step by step procedure for the development of computer program
to generate Interaction curve for rectangular Concrete Filled Tube composite column in
Visual Basic 2012.
Chapter 5, include the step by step procedure for the development of computer pro-
gram to generate Interaction curve for circular Concrete Filled Tube composite column
in Visual Basic 2012.
Chapter 6, include the step by step procedure for the development of computer pro-
gram to generate Interaction curve for Rectangular Full concrete encased Steel Section in
Visual Basic 2012.
Chapter 7, include the step by step procedure for the development of computer pro-
gram to generate Interaction curve for Circular Full concrete encased Steel Section in
Visual Basic 2012.
Chapter 8, include the step by step procedure for the development of computer pro-
gram to generate Interaction curve for Rectangular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube in
Visual Basic 2012.
Chapter 9, include the step by step procedure for the development of computer pro-
gram to generate Interaction curve for Circular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube in
Visual Basic 2012.
Chapter 11, include the Summary, Conclusion and Future Scope of The Work.
Chapter 2
Literature Survey
2.1 General
This chapter includes the details regarding the literature that has been followed to un-
derstand the design philosophy, advancement in composite structural element.
9
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY 10
Specimens, in which ordinary concrete was used as encased concrete, showed sudden fall
in strength after the peak load because or early spalling. Also, specimen, in which welded
wire mesh was provided as reinforcement, showed the sudden fall in strength after peak
load. Specimen, in which U-cross ties were used as reinforcement, showed the greatest
peak load among all the eccentrically loaded column. Also, In all the specimens, peak
strength agreed with the predictions of the strain compatibility method. Ductility of the
specimens, in which ordinary concrete was encased, was limited because of the spalling of
the concrete after the peak load. CEFT columns are expected to be more vulnerable to
the premature spalling of the concrete encasement. Thus, seismic performance of CEFT
members needs to be verifies under cyclic lateral loading.
Figure 2.1: Details of Specimen with Studs, Wire Mesh , and Cross Ties.
Chen et al.[10] discussed the seismic behavior of full encased steel concrete column, when
it is designed based on chinese standard JGJ138-2001. Steel-concrete composite structural
systems has good rigidity, formability, and consume less construction time. Also, it has
excellent seismic performance. Seismic behavior of steel-concrete composite members is
related to factors like, axial compression, shear span ratio, steel ratio, reinforcement ratio,
stirrups ratio, and embedded depth ratio. The main objective of this study to investigate
the performance of full encased steel-concrete composite columns under seismic loading
by varying parameters like Axial compression ratio, shear span ratio, stirrups ratio, and
embedded depth ratio. Total 26 specimens were casted and they were divided into two
batch, First batch was further divided into three groups, all groups has different axial
compression ratio, and stirrups ratio. Second batch has fixed axial compression ratio but
different stirrups ratios. Axial load and lateral load were applied on the specimen in
two phases. First phase includes load before yielding in which initially 20% of calculated
capacity of specimen were applied laterally and then 10% of calculated capacity of speci-
men were applied as increment after every cycle. In second phase, loading after yielding,
4y increment was applied after every cycle and this displacement was maintained for 3
loading cycle. During the testing lateral load was measured using the sensor installed
on actuator and lateral displacement was measured using displacement meter. During
11 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY
the testing, initially horizontal cracks at the bottom of column was observed and then
this cracks were extended to the steel flange of encased section with the increment of
loading, then vertical cracks were observed under the reverse loading. All the specimens
behaved approximately elastic up to yield loading. Also hysteresis plots showed the great
energy dissipation capacity of specimens. From this experimental work author concluded
that keeping the axial force compression ratio constant and increasing the stirrups ratio,
specimen shows better deformation capacity and the strength decay comes slowly. Also,
ductility reduces with increment in axial compression ratio. Also stirrups ratio can be
reduced to 85% over the current value given in JGJ138-2001.
Verma et al.[11] Current codal provision, doesn’t provide any information regarding
the ultimate capacity of column made from high strength concrete and high grade of
steel section. Author has investigated the flexural deformation behavior of high strength
square concrete-filled steel tube experimentally. The main objective of the research work
is to investigate flexural capacity of square concrete filled tube by changing the (b/t)
ratio, and when it is subjected to axial load of 20% or 40% of ultimate axial load carrying
capacity of section. CFT test specimen of size 305 mm and length of 4 m was prepared.
Grade of encased concrete was 110 MPa. Material properties of steel section were pre-
pared by conducting the tensile test on the coupons obtained from the core of tube. A
test specimen was subjected to axial load of either 20% or 40% of ultimate axial load car-
rying capacity and end rotation was applied by creating equal and opposite force at the
top of column using hydraulic ram. In plane displacement of specimens were measured
using the LVDTs. After the experiment it was found out that initial flexural stiffness
doesn’t get increase with increasing the nominal yield stress or the level of axial load.
Also, increasing the (b/t) ratio of steel tube reduces the initial flexural stiffness. Also,
secondary flexural stiffness increases with the increase in the axial load. So initial and
secondary flexural stiffness of CFT column can be predicted reasonably using uncracked
transformed and cracked transformed sectional properties. Moment resisting capacity of
high strength square CFT columns can be predicted using the ACI guidelines.
Ekmekyapar and AL-Eliwi [12] As the current codal provision doesn’t provide de-
sign guidelines for Circular concrete filled tube column made from high strength concrete
and high yield strength of steel section. Author has experimentally investigated the total
18 circular concrete filled tube specimens. For Experiments ratio of length to diameter,
ratio of diameter to thickness, grade of concrete, were consider as main parameters. Steel
sections having yield strength 235 MPa and 355 MPa were used. It has diameter of 114.3
mm and thickness was varied from 2.74 mm to 5.9 mm. So by varying the thickness of
the section ratio of diameter to thickness was varied during this investigation. Concrete
of strength 56MPa, 66MPa, 107MPa, were used as infilled concrete. Also length of the
column was varied as 300 mm, 600 mm, and 900 mm during this investigation. Thick mica
plate was attached at the bottom of the specimen before filling the concrete to restrict the
infilled concrete. These plates were removed before the testing of the specimens. From
the experimental results author has calculated the strength index (SI) as :
Nu
SI =
As × fy + 0.85fc × Ac
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY 12
Figure 2.2 Shows the compression load versus shortening graph for column having 300 mm
length. From the Experiment it was found that specimens which has length as 300 mm was
failed because of crushing of concrete and yielding of steel section. Local buckling was also
observed in those specimens, so they were considered as short column. While specimens
which have length 600 mm showed the interaction between global and local failure modes,
hence they are considered as medium column, refer Figure 2.3. And Steel column which
has length 900 mm showed the buckling failure, hence it has been considered as long
column, refer Figure 2.4. As the grade of concrete increase axial compression capacity of
the specimen also increases. And for a single ratio of diameter to thickness, as the length
of the specimen increases, the axial compression capacity and SI index decreases.
Gen-tian et al.[13] In this paper, ten slender steel reinforced concrete composite columns
are tested under the eccentric loading. The effect of concrete strength, slenderness of col-
umn and eccentricity of axial load on the ultimate load carrying capacity has been studied.
13 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY
Further those results were compared with the ultimate load carrying capacity of slender
column obtained from ACI and Chinese specifications.
Test series consisted of 10 slender columns with compressive strength of concrete varies
from 41.2 MPa to 61.9 MPa, and steel shape I10 (h × bf × tw × tf = 100 mm × 68 mm
× 4.5 mm × 7.6 mm), with yield stress 379 MPa, was encased in concrete. The length
of columns were 2.6m, 3.2m or 4.1 m. 4 nos of 12 mm diameter bars were provided as
longitudinal reinforcement and stirrups of diameter 6 mm were provided at spacing of 150
mm C/C. Table 2.1 shows the details of the specimens.
Loading was applied with the help of hydraulic universal testing machine. The deflection
in the bending plane was measured with the help of linear variable displacement transduc-
ers (LVDTs). It were installed at the five different location along the length of the column.
Test results showed that Specimens from E1 to E4 showed no spalling of concrete and very
few tensile cracks at about 90% of maximum load. These columns showed the explosive
type of failure. However for specimen with high eccentricity , E6, E8 and E10, showed
the tensile cracks only at 30% of maximum load. In these specimens horizontal bending
cracks appear on the tensile face.
The column failure was observes in the region 500 mm above and below the mid point of
the column. Loss of concrete cover and the further increase of the axial load led to the
buckling of the flange of the steel section.
Strength of the composite column was calculated based on the specification given in ACI
381-05, EC2, China Specifications and those values were compared with the experimental
values. The mean ratio of experimental load and calculated load turn out to be 1.22 for
ACI 381-05, 0.97 for EC2, 1.21 for china specifications. From this it can be concluded that
ACI 381-05 gives more conservative results and EC2 gives slightly less conservative results.
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY 14
Kim et al.[14] In this paper, the behavior of composite column with high strength
steel(800MPa) and high strength concrete(100 MPa) under eccentric loading has been
investigated. Five fully encased square Column C1-C4, and Circular Column C5, While
two partial encased steel column C6 and C7 were tested. The specification of the all the
column is shown in figure 2.5.
Test parameters were the type and yield strength of steel, spacing of transverse reinforce-
ment and eccentricity of axial load. The eccentricity ratio, which is the ratio of eccentricity
of axial load to the Lateral dimension of column, was taken as 0.46 for C1, C3, C4, and
C6, While for column C2, and C7 it was taken as 0.23 , and for Column C5 it was taken
as 0.4. All the column except C3, were more confined, as the spacing between lateral ties
was less in compare to C3. Also, to analyze the behavior of the specimens, non-linear
analysis was performed, considering the strain compatibility. The results of experiments
and numerical analysis showed that during the tensile test of high strength steel, no ap-
parent yield plateau has been observed hence 0.2% offset yield strength was measured and
15 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY
yield strain was estimated as 0.0045, and 0.0039 for 913 MPa , and 806 MPa strength of
steel. The ultimate compressive strain of concrete was about 0.003, which was less than
the yield strain of the high-strength steel.
In fully encased composite specimens C1–C5, the first peak load was determined by the
complete spalling of the concrete cover and after the first peak load steel section was
started to yield. In the specimens that were well confined by lateral rebars, the load-
carrying capacity increased to the second peak load.
In the partially encased composite specimens C6 and C7, Compression flange of the
steel section yielded first then after spalling of concrete cover was started. Load carrying
capacity was continued to decrease after the first peak load.
All test specimens, including the test specimens with inadequate confinement and a low
eccentricity ratio , showed the ductile behavior and all the specimens had maintained the
moment carrying capacity after the delamination of cover and ultimately specimens failed
because of the crushing of the concrete.
Also the interaction curve was plotted using the current design code, like ACI 318-08,
Eurocode 4, AISC 360-10, of composite columns and their results were compared with
the experimental and numerical results. From that it can be said that ACI 318-08 under-
estimated the load carrying capacity of the specimens. While Eurocode 4 overestimates
the load carrying capacity of specimens. Nonlinear numerical analysis showed the good
agreement with the test results.
Giakoumelis and Lam[15] In this Paper behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tube
with various concrete strengths under axial load is presented. The effect of steel tube
thickness, the bond strength between the concrete and the steel tube, and confinement
of concrete are examined. Column strength which is measured experimentally has been
compared with the values predicted by Eurocode-4, Australian Standard, and American
codes. Total 15 specimens were tested 36, 60, 100 MPa concrete strength, with D/t ratio
from 22.9 to 30.5. All specimens were of diameter 114 mm and with wall thickness OF
3.6 mm, 5.0 mm. All specimens were of length 300 mm to eliminate the slenderness effect.
Typical mode of failure was local buckling. As Shown in Figure 2.6., Loss of strength
due to bond strength between concrete and steel tube is negligible for normal strength
concrete CFT, Refer Figure 2.7. For high strength concrete loss of strength due to bond
strength is more critical, refer Figure 2.8.
Further experimental results were compared with the values predicted by the EC4, ACI
318-95, and As3 600 and As4 100. Ratio of Experimental Axial load resistance and Axial
load resistance predicted by EC4 was varied between 0.881 to 1.217. Hence it can be said
that EC4 provides a good prediction of Axial capacity of CFT columns. For the 3.6 mm
steel tube the prediction of ACI and AS is more reliable than that for the thick one. ACI
and AS predicts around 31% , and 39 % higher value for 3.6 mm and 5.0 mm thick steel
tube respectively. The ACI and AS appeared to be very conservative. Further it can be
concluded that as the concrete strength increases the effect of the bond of the concrete
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY 16
and the steel tube became more critical. For Normal concrete strength, the reduction
on the axial capacity of the column due to bonding was negligible. For high-strength
concrete, the variation between Non-Greased and Greased was 17%. Moreover, Eurocode
4 provides a good prediction of the axial strength of concrete filled steel tube columns,
17% was the largest difference between the experimental and calculated value in axial
capacity. The predicted axial strength using ACI and AS were 35% lower than the results
obtained from experiments.
2.4 Summary
In this Chapter, one literature related to the design of Concrete filled tube has been men-
tioned. This literature has been used to understand the design process of Concrete filled
tube. While other literature shows the experimental behavior of CEFT, Full encased
Steel concrete column, High strength Concrete filled tubes under several different types
of loading respectively.
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE SURVEY 18
Chapter 3
3.1 General
1. It is only apply for the design of composite column and composite compression
members with concrete encased sections, partially encased section and concrete
filled rectangular and circular tubes.
2. It applies to column and compression members with steel grades S235 to S460 and
normal weight concrete of strength classes C20/25 to C50/60.
5. This method only applies to design of member which is doubly symmetrical and
uniform cross section over the member length.
6. The influence of local buckling of steel section on the resistance shall be considered
in design.
7. The effect of local buckling may be neglected for a steel section fully encased in
concrete.
19
CHAPTER 3. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR COMPOSITE COLUMN AS PER EN
1994-1-1:2004 20
2. As shown in Figure 3.1, For a fully encased steel section limit to the maximum
thickness of concrete cover that may be used in calculation are:
M axCz = 0.3h
M axCy = 0.4b
3. The longitudinal reinforcement that may be used in calculation should not exceed
6% of the concrete area.
4. The ratio of the depth to width of the composite cross-section should be within the
limits 0.2 and 5.
fyk
fyd =
γm
7. Design strength of longitudinal bar is given by,
fsk
fsd =
γs
8. when steel section is covered by concrete then design strength of concrete can be
taken as 0.85fcd
9. When concrete is filled in steel tube then design strength of concrete can be taken
as fcd
where,
fck = Characteristic strength of concrete refer EN 1992-1-1.
γc = partial safety factor for concrete,refer EN 1992-1-1.
fsk = Yield strength of steel reinforcement, refer EN 1992-1-1.
γs = partial safety factor for steel reinforcement, refer EN 1992-1-1.
fyk = Yield strength of steel section, refer EN 1993-1-1.
γm = partial safety factor for steel section, refer EN 1993-1-1.
CHAPTER 3. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR COMPOSITE COLUMN AS PER EN
21 1994-1-1:2004
3.2.3.1 Point A
Figure 3.3, shows the stress block to obtain the maximum axial load carrying capacity of
composite column. At point A moment of resistance of the section will be zero. Maximum
axial load carrying capacity of section can be calculated as :
Where,
Npl,Rd = Ultimate axial load Resistance of Composite Column.
Ac = Area of Concrete.
Aa = Area of Steel Section.
As = Area of longitudinal reinforcement.
3.2.3.2 Point B
Figure 3.4, shows the stress block to obtain plastic moment of resistance of composite
column. At point B axial load carrying capacity of the composite column will be zero.
To obtain Plastic moment of resistance of column it is essential to obtain the hn . It can
be obtained by Comparing the Compressive force in composite column with tensile force.
Net axial load carrying capacity of the section can be obtained by subtracting the total
tensile force in section from the total compressive force in section, which will turn out to
be zero.
Net Plastic moment of resistance can be obtained by subtracting the total moment of
resistance in tension region from the total moment of resistance in compressive region of
stress block. Moment is calculated from the center of the column.
CHAPTER 3. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR COMPOSITE COLUMN AS PER EN
1994-1-1:2004 22
3.2.3.3 Point C
Figure 3.5, shows the stress block to obtain the axial load carrying capacity and moment
of resistance at the point C. Stress axis will be below the center line of section at a distance
hn
Net axial load carrying capacity of the section can be obtained by subtracting the total
tensile force in section from the total compressive force in section.
Net Plastic moment of resistance can be obtained by subtracting the total moment of
resistance in tension region from the total moment of resistance in compressive region of
stress block. Moment is calculated from the center of the column.
3.2.3.4 Point D
Figure 3.6, shows the stress block to obtain the axial load carrying capacity and moment
of resistance at the point D. Here, Stress axis of stress block is coincide with the center
line of the composite column.
CHAPTER 3. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR COMPOSITE COLUMN AS PER EN
23 1994-1-1:2004
Net axial load carrying capacity of the section can be obtained by subtracting the to-
tal tensile force in section from the total compressive force in section, which will turb out
to be half then the axial load carrying capacity of composite column obtained at point C.
Net Plastic moment of resistance can be obtained by subtracting the total moment of
resistance in tension region from the total moment of resistance in compressive region of
stress block. Moment is calculated from the center of the column. Point D will give the
maximum plastic Moment of the resistance of the composite column.
3.3 Summary
In this Chapter the several assumptions, scope, and limitations of design philosophy of
the Eurocode-4 has been explained. Moreover This chapter includes the procedure to plot
the simplified interaction curve for the composite column.
Chapter 4
4.1 General
Simplified method given in Eurocode-4, gives the procedure to locate only four points on
the interaction curve of the composite column. However, Actual behaviour of composite
column can only be known if all the points on the interaction curve are known. All
the points on Interaction Curve can be obtained by moving plastic stress axis across the
cross-section of the composite column.
25
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 26
4.4.1 General
In this section step by step procedure to develop a computer program to generate Interac-
tion Curve for the Rectangular Concrete filled tube column is explained. Further Actual
Programming shown in this section has been done in Visual Basic 2012.
Also, As Shown in Figure 4.4, Various Load combinations for which Rectangular Concrete
filled tube column is required to design can also be added in to the table.
Here,
Nu = Axial Load acting on Rectangular Composite Column.
MuxTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxD = Design Moment with respect to x- axis.
MuyD = Design Moment with respect to y-axis.
MuxD is obtained as the maximum of MuxTop and MuxBot . While MuyD is obtained as
the maximum of MuyTop and MuyBot .
Sectional Properties for the rectangular steel section has been calculated according to
Annexure-A of IS 4923 : 1997 using the following formulas.
3
Aa = 2t (B − 4t) + (D − 4t) + πt
2
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 28
(D − 4t)3 1 (B − 4t) t3
2
Iax =t + + (B − 4t) (D − t) t +
6 2 3
2
πt4
3136 2 9π (D − 4t) + 56t
405 − 2 + 3πt
108 π 18π
(B − 4t)3 1 (D − 4t) t3
2
Iay =t + + (D − 4t) (B − t) t +
6 2 3
2
πt4
3136 2 9π (B − 4t) + 56t
405 − 2 + 3πt
108 π 18π
Where,
Aa = Area of Steel Section.
Iax = Moment of Inertia of Steel Section about x-axis.
Iay = Moment of Inertia of Steel Section about y-axis.
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
29 RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN
Area and Moment of Inertia of Longitudinal reinforcement bars can be calculated as,
π
As = 4 × × φ2
4
π π
Isx = 4 × φ4 + × φ2 × Y 12
64 4
π π
4
2 2
Isy =4 ×φ + ×φ ×Y2
64 4
Where,
φ = Diameter of Longitudinal Bars.
As = Area of Longitudinal Bars.
Isx = Moment of Inertia of longitudinal bars about x-axis.
Isy = Moment of Inertia of longitudinal bars about y-axis.
4.4.3.3 Concrete
Area and Moment of Inertia of the concrete region can be calculated as,
Ac = (B − 2t) × (D − 2t) − As
(B − 2t) × (D − 2t)3
Icx = − Isx
12
(D − 2t) × (B − 2t)3
Icy = − Isy
12
Where,
Ac = Area of Concrete.
Icx = Moment of Inertia of Concrete along x-axis.
Icy = Moment of Inertia of concrete along y-axis.
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 30
As per the Clause 6.7.3 EN 1994 1-1 : 2004, Maximum percentage of longitudinal rein-
forcement has been limited to 6%. Percentage of the longitudinal reinforcement bars, Pt,
can be calculated as,
As × 100
Pt =
Ac
Under the axial compression, Rectangular steel section can be susceptible to buckle locally.
Eurocode-4, relates the local buckling of the steel section with its aspect ratio. Local
buckling can be prevented by limiting the aspect ratio of steel section. Maximum limit
for the aspect ratio has been given in Table 6.3 of EN 1994 -1-1 : 2004. Which can be
given as,
s
D 235
max = 52
t fy
Where,
D = Depth of the steel section.
t = thickness of steel section.
fy = yield stress of steel section.
π 2 EIx,ef f
Ncr,x =
L2
π 2 EIy,ef f
Ncr,y =
L2
Where,
Kc = Correction factor that should be taken as 0.6.
L= Length of the composite column.
α = Imperfection factor, which can be taken as 0.21 for buckling class a.
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
Where,
Ac = Area of Concrete
Aa= Area of Steel Section
As = Area pf longitudinal Reinforcement
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M3 = 0
M3 = 0
C3 = 0
M3 = 0
C3 = 0
M1 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 40
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M3 = 0
M3 = 0
C3 = 0
M3 = 0
C3 = 0
M1 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 48
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
Nu,Rd = C1 + C2 + C3 − T 1 − T 2
Also, Once the Moment of resistance due to concrete ,M1, Moment of resistance due to
Steel section, M2, and Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement , M3, is
known then Ultimate Plastic Moment of resistance , Mu,Rd can be obtained as,
Mu,Rd = M 1 + M 2 + M 3
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
49 RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN
4.5 Summary
In this chapter, Complete procedure to generate Interaction curve for Rectangular Con-
crete filled tube has been explained. A Computer Program to design the Rectangular
Concrete filled tube for several load combinations has been explained.
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 50
5.1 General
Simplified method given in Eurocode-4, gives the procedure to locate only four points on
the interaction curve of the composite column. However, Actual behaviour of composite
column can only be known if all the points on the interaction curve are known. All
the points on Interaction Curve can be obtained by moving plastic stress axis across the
cross-section of the composite column.
51
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 52
Also, As Shown in Figure 5.4, Various Load combinations for which Circular Concrete
filled tube column is required to design can also be added in to the table.
Here,
Nu = Axial Load acting on Circular Composite Column.
MuxTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxD = Design Moment with respect to x- axis.
MuyD = Design Moment with respect to y-axis.
MuxD is obtained as the maximum of MuxTop and MuxBot . While MuyD is obtained as
the maximum of MuyTop and MuyBot .
π 2
D − (D − 2t)2
Aa =
4
π 4
D − (D − 2t)4
Ia =
64
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 54
Where,
Aa = Area of Steel Section.
Ia = Moment of Inertia of Steel Section.
π π π π π
Is = 4 × φ4 + × φ2 × y12 + 2 × φ4 + × φ2 × y22 + 2 × φ4
64 4 64 4 64
Where,
φ = Diameter of Longitudinal Bars.
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
55 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN
5.4.3.3 Concrete
Area and Moment of Inertia of the concrete region can be calculated as,
π
(D − 2t)2 − As
Ac =
4
π
(D − 2t)4 − Is
Ic =
64
Where,
Ac = Area of Concrete.
Ic = Moment of Inertia of Concrete.
Where,
D = Diameter of the steel section.
t = thickness of steel section.
fy = yield stress of steel section.
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 56
EIef f = Ea Ia + Es Is + Kc Ec Ic
π 2 EIef f
Ncr =
L2
ω = 0.5 1 + α (λ − 0.2) + λ2
Where,
Kc = Correction factor that should be taken as 0.6.
L= Length of the composite column.
α = Imperfection factor, which can be taken as 0.21 for buckling class a.
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
!
D
− hn
α = 2 × cos−1 2
R
Compressive force due to Concrete,
fcd
C1 = × Ac
1000
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
R2
fyd π×α
C2 = × Aa − × − sinα
1000 2 180
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M3 = 0
!
D
− hn
θ = 2 × cos−1 2
r
!
D
−1 2
− hn
α = 2 × cos
R
Compressive force due to Concrete,
r2
fcd π×θ
C1 = × Ac − × − sinθ
1000 2 180
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 60
T2 = 0
M3 = 0
!
D
− hn
θ = 2 × cos−1 2
r
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
61 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN
!
D
− hn
α = 2 × cos−1 2
R
Compressive force due to Concrete,
r2
fcd π×θ π 2
C1 = × Ac − × − sinθ + × φ
1000 2 180 4
!
D
hn −
θ = 2 × cos−1 2
r
!
D
hn −
α = 2 × cos−1 2
R
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
fcd r π×θ π 2
C1 = × × − sinθ − × φ
1000 2 180 4
!
D
hn −
θ = 2 × cos−1 2
r
!
D
hn −
α = 2 × cos−1 2
R
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
fcd r π×θ
C1 = × × − sinθ
1000 2 180
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
2
r2
fyd R π×α π×θ
C2 = × × − sinα − × − sinθ
1000 2 180 2 180
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
67 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN
C3 = 0
fsd
T2 = × As
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
fcd 4 3 3 θ
M1 = × × r × sin
106 6 2
M3 = 0
!
D
hn −
α = 2 × cos−1 2
R
Compressive force due to Concrete,
C1 = 0
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 68
C3 = 0
M1 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
fyd
T1 = × Aa
1000
fsd
T2 = × As
1000
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
Nu,Rd = C1 + C2 + C3 − T 1 − T 2
Also, Once the Moment of resistance due to concrete ,M1, Moment of resistance due to
Steel section, M2, and Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement , M3, is
known then Ultimate Plastic Moment of resistance , Mu,Rd can be obtained as,
Mu,Rd = M 1 + M 2 + M 3
CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE COLUMN 70
6.1 General
Simplified method given in Eurocode-4, gives the procedure to locate only four points on
the interaction curve of the composite column. However, Actual behaviour of composite
column can only be known if all the points on the interaction curve are known. All
the points on Interaction Curve can be obtained by moving plastic stress axis across the
cross-section of the composite column.
73
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 74
Figure 6.2, shows the flowchart for the development of computer program for the gener-
ation of Interaction curve for the Rectangular Full concrete Encased Steel Section.
Figure 6.2: Flow Chart for the Rectangular Concrete Encased Steel Section
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
75 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Also, As Shown in Figure 6.4, Various Load combinations for which Rectangular Concrete
Encased column is required to design can also be added in to the table.
Here,
Nu = Axial Load acting on Rectangular Concrete encased steel section.
MuxTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxD = Design Moment with respect to x- axis.
MuyD = Design Moment with respect to y-axis.
MuxD is obtained as the maximum of MuxTop and MuxBot . While MuyD is obtained as
the maximum of MuyTop and MuyBot .
add 2nd layer of reinforcement. Area and Moment of Inertia of Longitudinal reinforcement
bars can be calculated as,
π
As0 = (ns0 ) × × φ2
4
π
As1 = (ns1 ) × × φ2
4
π
As2 = (ns2 ) × × φ2
4
π
As3 = (ns3 ) × × φ2
4
As = As0 + As1 + As2 + As3
π π
Isx = (ns0 + ns3 ) × × φ4 + × φ2 × Y 02 +
π 64 4
4 π 2 2
π
4
(ns2 ) × × φ + × φ × Y 2 + (ns1 ) × ×φ
64 4 64
π π π
Isy = (ns0 + ns1 + ns2 ) × × φ4 + × φ2 × X02 + (ns3 ) × × φ4
64 4 64
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
77 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Where,
φ = Diameter of Longitudinal Bars.
ns0 = Numbers of reinforcement in 0 layer.
ns1 = Numbers of reinforcement in 1 layer.
ns2 = Numbers of reinforcement in 2 layer.
ns3 = Numbers of reinforcement in 3 layer.
As0 = Area of 0 layer reinforcement.
As1 = Area of 1st layer reinforcement.
As2 = Area of 2nd layer reinforcement.
As3 = Area of 3rd layer reinforcement.
As = Area of Longitudinal Bars.
Isx = Moment of Inertia of longitudinal bars about x-x axis.
Isy = Moment of Inertia of longitudinal bars about y-y axis.
6.4.3.3 Concrete
Area and Moment of Inertia of the concrete region can be calculated as,
Ac = Bc × Dc − Aa − As
Bc × Dc3
Icx = − Iax − Isx
12
Dc × Bc3
Icy = − Iay − Isy
12
Where,
Ac = Area of Concrete.
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 78
EIef f = Ea Ia + Es Is + Kc Ec Ic
π 2 EIef f
Ncr =
L2
ω = 0.5 1 + α (λ − 0.2) + λ2
Where,
Kc = Correction factor that should be taken as 0.6.
L= Length of the composite column.
α = Imperfection factor, which can be taken as 0.34 for buckling class b (about x-x axis),
0.49 for buckling class c (about y-y axis).
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
6.4.5.4 When Stress axis is at , (0.5Dc -Y0) < hnx < 0.5(0.5Dc -D)
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Ac − (Bc × hnx − 0.5 (As0 + As3 ))]
1000
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × Aa
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd
C3 = × [As − 0.5 (As0 + As3 )]
1000
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 82
Figure 6.9: Stress Axis at (0.5Dc -Y0) < hnx < 0.5(0.5Dc -D)
M2 = 0
6.4.5.5 When Stress axis is at, 0.5(0.5Dc -D) < hnx < 0.5(0.5Dc -D) +tf
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Ac − (Bc × hnx − 0.5 (As0 + As3 ) − B f (0.5D − (0.5Dc − hnx)))]
1000
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × [Aa − B f (0.5D − (0.5Dc − hnx))]
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd
C3 = × [As − 0.5 (As0 + As3 )]
1000
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
83 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Figure 6.10: Stress Axis at 0.5(0.5Dc -D) < hnx < 0.5(0.5Dc -D) +tf
6.4.5.6 When Stress axis is at , 0.5(0.5Dc -D) +tf < hnx < (Dc -Y2)
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Ac − (Bc × hnx − 0.5 (As0 + As3 )
1000
−B f × tf − tw (0.5D − tf − (0.5Dc − hnx))]
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 84
Figure 6.11: Stress Axis at 0.5(0.5Dc -D) +tf < hnx < (Dc -Y2)
6.4.5.7 When Stress axis is at,(Dc -Y2) < hnx < (0.5Dc -0.5φ)
Figure 6.12: Stress Axis at (Dc -Y2) < hnx < (0.5Dc -0.5φ)
φ3
2fsd
M3 = × 0.5 (As0 + As3 ) Y 0 + 0.5As2 × Y 2 +
106 6
6.4.5.9 When Stress axis is at,0.5Dc < hnx < (0.5Dc +Y2)
Figure 6.14: Stress Axis at 0.5Dc < hnx < (0.5Dc +Y2)
6.4.5.10 When Stress axis is at ,(0.5Dc +Y2) < hnx < 0.5Dc + (0.5D-tf )
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Bc × (Dc − hnx) − 0.5 (As0 + As3 )
1000
−B f × tf − tw (0.5D − tf − (hnx − 0.5Dc))]
Figure 6.15: Stress Axis at (0.5Dc +Y2) < hnx < 0.5Dc + (0.5D-tf )
Figure 6.16: Stress Axis at 0.5Dc + (0.5D-tf ) < hnx < 0.5Dc +0.5D
6.4.5.11 When Stress axis is at ,0.5Dc + (0.5D-tf ) < hnx < 0.5Dc +0.5D
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Bc × (Dc − hnx) − 0.5 (As0 + As3 ) − B f × (0.5Dc + 0.5D − hnx)]
1000
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × [B f × (0.5Dc + 0.5D − hnx)]
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd
C3 = × [0.5 (As0 + As3 )]
1000
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad × Aa
T1 = − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd × As
T2 = − C3
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
M1 = × [Bc × (Dc − hnx) × (0.5Dc − 0.5 (Dc − hnx)) − 0.5 (As0 + As3 ) Y 0
106
−B f × (0.5Dc + 0.5D − hnx) × (hnx − 0.5Dc + 0.5 (0.5Dc + 0.5D − hnx))]
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
2fad
M2 = ×[B f × (0.5Dc + 0.5D − hnx) × (hnx − 0.5Dc + 0.5 (0.5Dc + 0.5D − hnx))]
106
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
91 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
6.4.5.12 When Stress axis is at ,0.5Dc +0.5D < hnx < 0.5Dc + Y0
Figure 6.17: Stress Axis at 0.5Dc +0.5D < hnx < 0.5Dc + Y0
C2 = 0
M2 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M1 = 0
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
T2 = 0
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
95 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
6.4.6.2 When Stress axis is at, 0 < hny < 0.5Bc -X0
T2 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
6.4.6.3 When Stress axis is at, 0.5Bc -X0 < hny < 0.5Bc -0.5Bf
Figure 6.22: Stress Axis at 0.5Bc -X0 < hny < 0.5Bc -0.5Bf
M2 = 0
6.4.6.4 When Stress axis is at, 0.5Bc -0.5Bf < hny < 0.5Bc -0.5tw
Figure 6.23: Stress Axis at 0.5Bc -0.5Bf < hny < 0.5Bc -0.5tw
φ3
2fsd
M3 = × 0.5 (As0 + As1 + As2 ) × X0 +
106 6
6.4.6.6 When Stress axis is at, 0.5Bc < hny < 0.5Bc +0.5Bf
Figure 6.25: Stress Axis at 0.5Bc < hny < 0.5Bc +0.5Bf
6.4.6.7 When Stress axis is at, 0.5Bc +0.5Bf < hny < 0.5Bc +X0
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Dc × (Bc − hny) − 0.5 (As0 + As1 + As2 )]
1000
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
C2 = 0
Figure 6.26: Stress Axis at 0.5Bc +0.5Bf < hny < 0.5Bc +X0
M2 = 0
6.4.6.8 When Stress axis is at, 0.5Bc + X0 < hny < 0.5Bc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd
C1 = × [Dc × (Bc − hny)]
1000
C2 = 0
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 102
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
103 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
C3 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
Nu,Rd = C1 + C2 + C3 − T 1 − T 2
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 104
Also, Once the Moment of resistance due to concrete ,M1, Moment of resistance due to
Steel section, M2, and Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement , M3, is
known then Ultimate Plastic Moment of resistance , Mu,Rd can be obtained as,
Mu,Rd = M 1 + M 2 + M 3
Figure 6.29: Interaction Curve of Rectangular Concrete Encased Steel Column with Re-
spect to X-Axis.
6.5 Summary
In this chapter, Complete procedure to generate Interaction curve for Rectangular Con-
crete Encased Steel Section has been explained. A Computer Program to design the
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
105 RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Figure 6.30: Interaction Curve of Rectangular Concrete Encased Steel Column with re-
spect to Y-Axis.
Rectangular Concrete Encased Steel Section for several load combinations has been ex-
plained.
CHAPTER 6. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 106
Chapter 7
7.1 General
Simplified method given in Eurocode-4, gives the procedure to locate only four points on
the interaction curve of the composite column. However, Actual behaviour of composite
column can only be known if all the points on the interaction curve are known. All
the points on Interaction Curve can be obtained by moving plastic stress axis across the
cross-section of the composite column.
107
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 108
Figure 7.2, shows the flowchart for the development of computer program for the gener-
ation of Interaction curve for the Circular Full concrete Encased Steel Section.
Figure 7.2: Flow Chart for the Circular Concrete Encased Steel Section
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
109 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Also, As Shown in Figure 7.4, Various Load combinations for which Circular Concrete
Encased column is required to design can also be added in to the table.
Here,
Nu = Axial Load acting on Circular Concrete encased steel section.
MuxTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxD = Design Moment with respect to x- axis.
MuyD = Design Moment with respect to y-axis.
MuxD is obtained as the maximum of MuxTop and MuxBot . While MuyD is obtained as
the maximum of MuyTop and MuyBot .
π
As2 = (4) × × φ2
4
As = As0 + As1 + As2
π π π π π
Isx =2× × φ4 + × φ2 × Y 02 + 4 × × φ4 + × φ2 × Y 22 + 2 × × φ4
64 4 64 4 64
π π π π π
4 2 2 4 2 2 4
Isy = 2× × φ + × φ × X1 + 4 × × φ + × φ × X2 + 2 × ×φ
64 4 64 4 64
Where,
φ = Diameter of Longitudinal Bars.
As0 = Area of 0 layer reinforcement.
As1 = Area of 1st layer reinforcement.
As2 = Area of 2nd layer reinforcement.
As = Area of Longitudinal Bars.
Isx = Moment of Inertia of longitudinal bars about x-x axis.
Isy = Moment of Inertia of longitudinal bars about y-y axis.
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
111 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
7.4.3.3 Concrete
Area and Moment of Inertia of the concrete region can be calculated as,
π
Ac = × Dc2 − Aa − As
4
Dc4
Icx = − Iax − Isx
64
Dc4
Icy = − Iay − Isy
64
Where,
Ac = Area of Concrete.
Aa = Area of Steel Section.
Icx = Moment of Inertia of Concrete about x-x axis.
Icy = Moment of Inertia of Concrete about y-y axis.
As × 100
Pt =
Ac
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 112
EIef f = Ea Ia + Es Is + Kc Ec Ic
π 2 EIef f
Ncr =
L2
ω = 0.5 1 + α (λ − 0.2) + λ2
Where,
Kc = Correction factor that should be taken as 0.6.
L= Length of the composite column.
α = Imperfection factor, which can be taken as 0.34 for buckling class b (about x-x axis),
0.49 for buckling class c (about y-y axis).
generated. In these program Plastic stress axis, which is denoted as hnx, is moving form
hnx=0, to the hnx=Dc .
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
7.4.5.3 When Stress axis is at, 0< hnx < Frc -Y0
−1 Frc − hnx
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α
C1 = × Ac − − sin α
1000 2 180
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × Aa
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd
C3 = × As
1000
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
115 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
7.4.5.4 When Stress axis is at , Frc -Y0 < hnx < Frc -0.5D
Figure 7.9: Stress Axis at Frc -Y0 < hnx < Frc -0.5D
−1 Frc − hnx
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π 2
C1 = × Ac − − sin α − × φ
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × Aa
1000
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 116
M2 = 0
7.4.5.5 When Stress axis is at , Frc -0.5D < hnx < Frc -(0.5D-tf )
Figure 7.10: Stress Axis at Frc -0.5D < hnx < Frc -(0.5D-tf )
−1 Frc − hnx
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π 2
C1 = × Ac − − sin α − × φ − B f × (hnx − (Frc − 0.5D))
1000 2 180 4
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
117 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
fsd π 2
C3 = × As − × φ
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
7.4.5.6 When Stress axis is at , Frc -0.5D +tf < hnx < Frc -Y2
−1 Frc − hnx
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π
C1 = × Ac − − sin α − × φ2 − B f × tf
1000 2 180 4
−tw × (hnx − (Frc − 0.5D + tf ))
fad
C2 = × [Aa − B f × tf f − tw × (hnx − (Frc − 0.5D + tf ))]
1000
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 118
Figure 7.11: Stress Axis at Frc -0.5D +tf < hnx < Frc -Y2
fsd h π i
C3 = × As − × φ2
1000 4
Figure 7.12: Stress Axis at Frc -Y2 < hnx < Frc
7.4.5.7 When Stress axis is at , Frc -Y2 < hnx < Frc
−1 Frc − hnx
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π
C1 = × Ac − − sin α − 3 × × φ2 − B f × tf
1000 2 180 4
−tw × (hnx − (Frc − 0.5D + tf ))]
7.4.5.9 When Stress axis is at, Frc < hnx < Frc +Y2
Figure 7.14: Stress Axis at Frc < hnx < Frc +Y2
−1 hnx − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π
C1 = × − sin α − 3 × × φ2 − B f × tf
1000 2 180 4
−tw × (Frc + 0.5D − tf − hnx)]
7.4.5.10 When Stress axis is at, Frc +Y2 < hnx < Frc +0.5D-tf
Figure 7.15: Stress Axis at Frc +Y2 < hnx < Frc +0.5D-tf
−1 hnx − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
123 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
7.4.5.11 When Stress axis is at , Frc +0.5D-tf < hnx < Frc +0.5D
−1 hnx − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π 2
C1 = × − sin α − × φ − B f × (hnx − (Frc + 0.5D − tf )) ]
1000 2 180 4
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 124
Figure 7.16: Stress Axis at Frc +0.5D-tf < hnx < Frc +0.5D
fad
C2 = × [B f × (hnx − (Frc + 0.5D − tf ))]
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd hπ i
C3 = × × φ2
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Figure 7.17: Stress Axis at Frc +0.5D < hnx < Frc +Y0
7.4.5.12 When Stress axis is at , Frc +0.5D < hnx < Frc +Y0
−1 hnx − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α π 2
C1 = × − sin α − × φ
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
C2 = 0
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd hπ i
C3 = × × φ2
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd
T2 = × As − C3
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
0.85fcd 4 3 3 α
π
2
M1 = × × Frc × sin − ×φ ×Y0
106 6 2 4
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
M2 = 0
Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
2fsd π 2
i
M3 = × × φ × Y 0
106 4
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 126
Figure 7.18: Stress Axis at Frc +Y0 < hnx < 2Frc
7.4.5.13 When Stress axis is at Frc +Y0 < hnx < 2Frc
−1 hnx − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π × α
C1 = × − sin α
1000 2 180
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
127 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 128
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
129 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
7.4.6.2 When Stress axis is at, 0< hny < Frc -X1
−1 Frc − hny
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α
C1 = × Ac − × − sin α
1000 2 180
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × Aa
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd
C3 = × As
1000
Tensile force due to steel section,
T1 = 0
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
T2 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 130
Figure 7.22: Stress Axis at Frc -X1 < hny < Frc -X2
7.4.6.3 When Stress axis is at, Frc -X1 < hny < Frc -X2
−1 Frc − hny
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α π 2
C1 = × Ac − × − sin α − × φ
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × Aa
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
fsd π 2
i
C3 = × As − × φ
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd
T2 = × As − C3
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
0.85fcd 4 3 3 α
π
2
M1 = × × Frc × sin − × φ × X1
106 6 2 4
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
M2 = 0
Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
2fsd π 2
i
M3 = × × φ × X1
106 4
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
131 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
7.4.6.4 When Stress axis is at, Frc -X2 < hny < Frc -0.5Bf
Figure 7.23: Stress Axis at Frc -X2 < hny < Frc -0.5Bf
−1 Frc − hny
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α π 2
C1 = × Ac − × − sin α − 3 × × φ
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × Aa
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
fsd π 2
i
C3 = × As − 3 × × φ
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd
T2 = × As − C3
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
0.85fcd 4 3 3 α
π
2 π 2
M1 = × × Frc × sin − × φ × X1 − 2 × × φ × X2
106 6 2 4 4
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
M2 = 0
Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
2fsd π 2 π 2
i
M3 = × × φ × X1 + 2 × × φ × X2
106 4 4
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 132
Figure 7.24: Stress Axis at Frc -0.5Bf < hny < Frc -0.5tf
7.4.6.5 When Stress axis is at, Frc -0.5Bf < hny < Frc -0.5tf
−1 Frc − hny
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α π 2
C1 = × Ac − × − sin α − 3 × × φ − 2 × tf × (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f ))
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × [Aa − 2 × tf × (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f ))]
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
fsd π 2
i
C3 = × As − 3 × × φ
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd
T2 = × As − C3
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
0.85fcd 4 3 3 α
π π
M1 = 6
× × Frc × sin − × φ2 × X1 − 2 × × φ2 × X2
10 6 2 4 4
−2 × tf × (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f )) × (Frc − hny + 0.5 (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f )))]
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
2fad
M2 = ×[2 × tf × (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f )) × (Frc − hny + 0.5 (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f )))]
106
Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
2fsd π 2 π 2
i
M3 = × × φ × X1 + 2 × × φ × X2
106 4 4
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
133 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
−1 Frc − hny
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
0.85fcd Ac
C1 = ×
1000 2
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad Aa
C2 = ×
1000 2
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd As
C3 = ×
1000 2
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd
T2 = × As − C3
1000
Moment of resistance due to Concrete,
φ3
0.85fcd 4 3 3 α
π
2 π 2
M1 = × × Frc × sin − × φ × X1 − 2 × × φ × X2 − 2 ×
106 6 2 4 4 6
−2 × tf × (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f )) × (Frc − hny + 0.5 (hny − (Frc − 0.5B f )))
− (D − 2tf ) × (hny − (Frc − 0.5tw )) × (Frc − hny + 0.5 (hny − (Frc − 0.5tw )))]
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 134
7.4.6.7 When Stress axis is at, Frc +0.5tw < hny < Frc +0.5Bf
Figure 7.26: Stress Axis at Frc +0.5tw < hny < Frc +0.5Bf
−1 hny − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α π 2
C1 = × × − sin α − 3 × × φ − 2 × tf × (Frc + 0.5B f − hny) ]
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
fad
C2 = × [2 × tf × (Frc + 0.5B f − hny)]
1000
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
fsd h π i
C3 = × 3 × × φ2
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd
T2 = × As − C3
1000
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
135 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
7.4.6.8 When Stress axis is at, Frc +0.5Bf < hny < Frc +X2
Figure 7.27: Stress Axis at Frc +0.5Bf < hny < Frc +X2
−1 hny − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α π 2
C1 = × × − sin α − 3 × × φ
1000 2 180 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
C2 = 0
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
fsd π i
C3 = × 3 × × φ2
1000 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fad
T1 = × Aa − C2
1000
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 136
M2 = 0
7.4.6.9 When Stress axis is at, Frc +X2 < hny < Frc +X1
Figure 7.28: Stress Axis at Frc +X2 < hny < Frc +X1
−1 hny − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α π 2
C1 = × × − sin α − × φ
1000 2 180 4
C2 = 0
M2 = 0
7.4.6.10 When Stress axis is at, Frc +X1 < hny < 2Frc +X1
Figure 7.29: Stress Axis at Frc +X1 < hny < 2Frc +X1
−1 hny − Frc
α = 2 cos
Frc
Compressive force due to Concrete,
2
0.85fcd Frc π×α
C1 = × × − sin α
1000 2 180
C2 = 0
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION 138
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
C1 = 0
C2 = 0
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
139 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Nu,Rd = C1 + C2 + C3 − T 1 − T 2
Also, Once the Moment of resistance due to concrete ,M1, Moment of resistance due to
Steel section, M2, and Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement , M3, is
known then Ultimate Plastic Moment of resistance , Mu,Rd can be obtained as,
Mu,Rd = M 1 + M 2 + M 3
7.5 Summary
In this chapter, Complete procedure to generate Interaction curve for Circular Concrete
Encased Steel Section has been explained. A Computer Program to design the Circular
Concrete Encased Steel Section for several load combinations has been explained.
CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
141 FULL CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL SECTION
Figure 7.32: Interaction Curve of Circular Concrete Encased Steel Column with respect
to Y-Axis.
8.1 General
Simplified method given in Eurocode-4, gives the procedure to locate only four points on
the interaction curve of the composite column. However, Actual behaviour of composite
column can only be known if all the points on the interaction curve are known. All
the points on Interaction Curve can be obtained by moving plastic stress axis across the
cross-section of the composite column.
143
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 144
Figure 8.2: Flow Chart for the Rectangular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
145 RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
Also, As Shown in Figure 8.4, Various Load combinations for Rectangular concrete en-
cased and filled tube which is required to design can also be added in to the table.
Here,
Nu = Axial Load acting on Rectangular concrete encased and filled tube.
MuxTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxD = Design Moment with respect to x- axis.
MuyD = Design Moment with respect to y-axis.
MuxD is obtained as the maximum of MuxTop and MuxBot . While MuyD is obtained as
the maximum of MuyTop and MuyBot .
Figure 8.3: Input Required for Rectangular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube
(B − 4t)3 1 (D − 4t) t3
2
Iay =t + + (D − 4t) (B − t) t +
6 2 3
2
πt4
3136 2 9π (B − 4t) + 56t
405 − 2 + 3πt
108 π 18π
Where,
Aa = Area of Steel Section.
Iax = Moment of Inertia of Steel Section about x-axis.
Iay = Moment of Inertia of Steel Section about y-axis.
π
As0 = (ns0 ) × × φ2o
4
π
As1 = (ns1 ) × × φ2o
4
π
As3 = (ns3 ) × × φ2o
4
As,out = As0 + As1 + As3
π
As,in = (ns4 ) × × φ2in
4
As = As,out + As,in
π π π
Isx = (ns0 + ns3 ) × × φ4o + × φ2o × Y 02 + ns1 × × φ4o
64 4 π 64
4 π 2 2
+ns4 × × φin + × φin × Y 4
64 4
π π π
Isy = (ns0 + ns1 ) × × φ4o + × φ2o × X12 + ns3 × × φ4o
64 4 π 64
π
+ (ns4 ) × × φin + × φin × X42
4 2
64 4
Where,
φo = Diameter of Longitudinal Bars outside the steel Tube.
φin = Diameter of Longitudinal Bars inside the Steel Tube.
ns0 = nos of bars in 0 Layer Reinforcement,4.
ns1 = nos of bars in 1st Layer Reinforcement,2.
ns3 = nos of bars in 3rd Layer Reinforcement,2.
ns4 = nos of bars in 4th Layer Reinforcement,4.
As0 = Area of 0 layer reinforcement.
As1 = Area of 1st layer reinforcement.
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 148
8.4.3.3 Concrete
Area and Moment of Inertia for the Inside concrete and outside concrete region can be
calculated as,
Where,
Ac,in = Area of Concrete inside the Rectangular Tube.
Ac,out = Area of Concrete Outside the Rectangular Tube.
Ac = Total Area of Concrete.
Icx = Moment of Inertia of Concrete about x-x axis.
Icy = Moment of Inertia of Concrete about y-y axis.
EIef f = Ea Ia + Es Is + Kc Ec Ic
π 2 EIef f
Ncr =
L2
ω = 0.5 1 + α (λ − 0.2) + λ2
1
χ= √
ω+ ω 2 + λ2
Where,
Kc = Correction factor that should be taken as 0.6.
L= Length of the composite column.
α = Imperfection factor, which can be taken as 0.21 for buckling class a for both x-x
axis,and y-y axis.
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M2 = 0
C2 = 0
M2 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
165 RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
C3 = 0
C4 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
M2 = 0
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
169 RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
M3 = 0
M2 = 0
C2 = 0
M2 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 180
C4 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
Nu,Rd = C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 − T 1 − T 2
Also, Once the Moment of resistance due to outside concrete ,M1,Moment of resistance
due to inside concrete ,M2, Moment of resistance due to Steel section, M3, and Moment of
resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement , M4, is known then Ultimate Plastic Moment
of resistance , Mu,Rd can be obtained as,
Mu,Rd = M 1 + M 2 + M 3 + M 4
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
181 RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
Figure 8.31: Interaction Curve of Rectangular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube with
respect to X-Axis.
Where,
MuxD = Design Moment of the composite column about x-axis.
MuyD = Design Moment of the composite column about y-axis.
MuxL = Moment of resistance for the acting axial load, Nu about x-axis.
MuyL = Moment of resistance for the acting axial load, Nu about y-axis.
8.5 Summary
In this chapter, Complete procedure to generate Interaction curve for Rectangular Con-
crete Encased and Filled Steel Tube has been explained. A Computer Program to design
the Rectangular Concrete Encased and Filled Steel Tube for several load combinations
has been explained.
CHAPTER 8. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 182
Figure 8.32: Interaction Curve of Rectangular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube with
respect to Y-Axis.
9.1 General
Simplified method given in Eurocode-4, gives the procedure to locate only four points on
the interaction curve of the composite column. However, Actual behaviour of composite
column can only be known if all the points on the interaction curve are known. All
the points on Interaction Curve can be obtained by moving plastic stress axis across the
cross-section of the composite column.
183
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 184
Also, As Shown in Figure 9.4, Various Load combinations for Circular concrete encased
and filled tube which is required to design can also be added in to the table.
Here,
Nu = Axial Load acting on Circular concrete encased and filled tube.
MuxTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyTop = Bending Moment acting at the top of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to x-axis.
MuyBot = Bending Moment acting at the Bottom of column with respect to y-axis.
MuxD = Design Moment with respect to x- axis.
MuyD = Design Moment with respect to y-axis.
MuxD is obtained as the maximum of MuxTop and MuxBot . While MuyD is obtained as
the maximum of MuyTop and MuyBot .
Figure 9.3: Input Required for Circular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube
9.4.3.3 Concrete
Area and Moment of Inertia for the Inside concrete and outside concrete region can be
calculated as,
π
Ac,in = × (Ds − 2t)2 − As,in
4
π
Ac,out = × Ds2 − Aa − Ac,in − As,in − As,out
4
Ac = Ac,in + Ac,out
π
Ic = × Ds4 − Ia − Is
64
Where,
Ac,in = Area of Concrete inside the Circular Tube.
Ac,out = Area of Concrete Outside the Circular Tube.
Ac = Total Area of Concrete.
Ic = Moment of Inertia of Concrete about X and Y axis.
EIef f = Ea Ia + Es Is + Kc Ec Ic
π 2 EIef f
Ncr =
L2
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
189 CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
ω = 0.5 1 + α (λ − 0.2) + λ2
1
χ= √
ω+ ω 2 + λ2
Where,
Kc = Correction factor that should be taken as 0.6.
L= Length of the composite column.
α = Imperfection factor, which can be taken as 0.21 for buckling class a for both x-x
axis,and y-y axis.
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
−1 0.5D − hnx
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
Compressive force due to Outside Concrete,
" !#
(0.5D)2
0.85fcd π × α1 π
C1 = × Ac,out − × − sin α1 − × φ2o
1000 2 180 4
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
−1 0.5D − hnx
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 194
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
−1 0.5D − hnx
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
−1 0.5D − hnx
β = 2 cos
0.5Ds
−1 0.5D − hnx
γ = 2 cos
0.5Ds − t
Compressive force due to Outside Concrete,
"
(0.5D)2
0.85fcd π × α1 π
C1 = × Ac,out − × − sin α1 − × φ2o
1000 2 180 4
ns2 π (0.5Ds)2
π×β
2
− × × φo − × − sin β ]
2 4 2 180
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
197 CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
−1 0.5D − hnx
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
−1 0.5D − hnx
β = 2 cos
0.5Ds
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 200
−1 0.5D − hnx
γ = 2 cos
0.5Ds − t
Compressive force due to Outside Concrete,
"
(0.5D)2
0.85fcd π × α1 π
C1 = × Ac,out − × − sin α1 − × φ2o
1000 2 180 4
ns2 π (0.5Ds)2
π×β
2
− × × φo − × − sin β ]
2 4 2 180
Compressive force due to Inside Concrete,
" !#
(0.5Ds − t)2
fcd π×γ π ns4 π
C2 = × Ac,in − × − sin γ − × φ2in − × × φ2in
1000 2 180 4 2 4
Compressive force due to Steel Section,
" !#
(0.5Ds)2 (0.5Ds − t)2
fyd π×β π×γ
C3 = × Aa − × − sin β − × − sin γ
1000 2 180 2 180
Compressive Force due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
fsd π ns2 π π ns4 π i
C4 = × As − × φ2o − × × φ2o − × φ2in − × × φ2in
1000 4 2 4 4 2 4
Tensile force due to steel section,
fyd × Aa
T1 = − C3
1000
Tensile Force due to Longitudinal Reinforcement,
fsd × As
T2 = − C4
1000
Moment of resistance due to Outside Concrete,
0.85fcd 4 3 3 α1 π 2 ns2 π 2
M1 = × × (0.5D) × sin − × φo × Y 0 − × × φo × Y 2
106 6 2 4 2 4
4 3 3 β
− × (0.5Ds) × sin ]
6 2
Moment of resistance due to Inside Concrete,
fcd 4 3 3 γ
π
2
n
s4 π 2
M2 = × × (0.5Ds − t) × sin − × φin × Y 3 − × × φin × Y 4
106 6 2 4 2 4
Moment of resistance due to Steel Section,
2fyd 4 3 3 β 4 3 3 γ
M3 = × × (0.5Ds) × sin − × (0.5Ds − t) × sin
106 6 2 6 2
Moment of resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement,
h
2fsd π 2 ns2 π 2
π
2
M4 = × × φo × Y 0 + × × φo × Y 2 + × φin × Y 3
106 4 2 4 4
n π
s4
+ × × φ2in × Y 4 ]
2 4
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
201 CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
ns5 φ3in
fcd 4 3 3 γ
π
2
n
s4 π 2
M2 = × × (0.5Ds − t) × sin − × φin × Y 3 − × × φin × Y 4 − ×
106 6 2 4 2 4 2 6
−1 hnx − 0.5D
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
−1 hnx − 0.5D
β = 2 cos
0.5Ds
−1 hnx − 0.5D
γ = 2 cos
0.5Ds − t
Compressive force due to Outside Concrete,
"
(0.5D)2
0.85fcd π × α1 π
C1 = × × − sin α1 − × φ2o
1000 2 180 4
ns2 π (0.5Ds)2
π×β
2
− × × φo − × − sin β ]
2 4 2 180
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
203 CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
−1 hnx − 0.5D
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
−1 hnx − 0.5D
β = 2 cos
0.5Ds
−1 hnx − 0.5D
γ = 2 cos
0.5Ds − t
Compressive force due to Outside Concrete,
"
(0.5D)2
0.85fcd π × α1 π
C1 = × × − sin α1 − × φ2o
1000 2 180 4
ns2 π (0.5Ds)2
π×β
2
− × × φo − × − sin β ]
2 4 2 180
Compressive force due to Inside Concrete,
" #
(0.5Ds − t)2
fcd π×γ
C2 = × × − sin γ
1000 2 180
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 206
M2 = 0
−1 hnx − 0.5D
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
Compressive force due to Outside Concrete,
" #
(0.5D)2
0.85fcd π × α1 π n s2
π
C1 = × × − sin α1 − × φ2o − × × φ2o
1000 2 180 4 2 4
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
−1 hnx − 0.5D
α1 = 2 cos
0.5D
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 210
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
C2 = 0
C3 = 0
C4 = 0
M2 = 0
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 212
M3 = 0
M4 = 0
Nu,Rd = C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 − T 1 − T 2
Also, Once the Moment of resistance due to outside concrete ,M1,Moment of resistance
due to inside concrete ,M2, Moment of resistance due to Steel section, M3, and Moment of
resistance due to longitudinal reinforcement , M4, is known then Ultimate Plastic Moment
of resistance , Mu,Rd can be obtained as,
Mu,Rd = M 1 + M 2 + M 3 + M 4
Figure 9.23: Interaction Curve of Circular Concrete Encased and Filled Tube with respect
to both X or Y-Axis.
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
213 CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE
Where,
MuxD = Design Moment of the composite column about x-axis.
MuyD = Design Moment of the composite column about y-axis.
MuxL = Moment of resistance for the acting axial load, Nu about x-axis.
MuyL = Moment of resistance for the acting axial load, Nu about y-axis.
9.5 Summary
In this chapter, Complete procedure to generate Interaction curve for Circular Concrete
Encased and Filled Steel Tube has been explained. A Computer Program to design the
Circular Concrete Encased and Filled Steel Tube for several load combinations has been
explained.
CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTION CURVE FOR THE CIRCULAR
CONCRETE ENCASED AND FILLED TUBE 214
Chapter 10
Experimental Investigation on
Behaviour of Concrete filled tube
10.1 General
The Aim of the Study is to investigate the behaviour of Concrete Filled Tube under ec-
centric as well we Axial Loading. As Interaction curve obtained from Analytical work, as
explained earlier, can be compared with the Interaction curve obtained experimentally.
Experimental Interaction curve can be obtained by applying Eccentric loading on speci-
men. It was applied in such a way that specimen has uniform moment across its length.
Moreover this investigation has been done for Circular and Square CFT. Test setup, Ex-
perimental results for both the type of Specimens has been given. Further, Experimental
Investigation on effect of slenderness on behaviour of Circular CFT under Axial loading
has been shown. Moreover, Its Experimental results has been compared with the results
obtained analytically.
215
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 216
As it was only a trial testing, Strain guages and LVDTs were not attached to the section.
Only the reading of Axial displacement with load has been taken. Test results are shown
in Table 10.2.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
217 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
Table 10.2: Comparision of Analytical and Experimental Results for Hollow Circular Steel
Tube
Figure 10.4: Failure Mode of Hollow Circular Steel Tube subjected to Axial Loading
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 218
Table 10.3: Experimental Results for Circular Hollow Steel Tube under Eccentric Loading
Figure 10.6: Behaviour of Circular HollowFigure 10.7: Local Buckling of Circular Hol-
Steel Tube under Eccentric Load low Steel Tube under Eccentric Load
and direction of Strain Gauges and LVDTs. Moreover Figure 10.9 shows the experimental
test setup for the Circular CFT under eccentric loading.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 220
Figure 10.8: Arrangement of Strain Gauges and LVDT on Circular CFT subjected to
Eccentric Loading
As shown in Figure 10.8. Three Strain Gauges were attached on the specimen. First
one was attached vertically on the Tensile face, B, of the specimen. Second Strain gauge
was attached horizontally on the front side, A, of the specimen. Third strain gauge
was attached vertically on the compression face, D, of the specimen. Strain results were
obtained using the Data Acquisition System having 16 Channel. Experimental values of
strain for Tensile face, B, Front Face, A, and Compression Face, D, has been shown in
Figure 10.10,Figure 10.11, and Figure 10.12 respectively. In those figure E10, E20, E30,
E35, represents the eccentricity as 10mm, 20mm, 30mm, 35mm respectively.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
221 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
Figure 10.9: Experimental Test Setup for Testing under Eccentric Loading
mm from the top of specimen.Second LVDT has been placed at the center of specimen.
The third one was attached at the distance of 50 mm from the bottom of the specimen.
Displacement due to Central, Top, and Bottom LVDT has been shown in Figure 10.14,
Figure 10.15, and Figure 10.16 respectively. Because of Improper attachment of Top and
bottom LVDT on a specimen with the eccentricity of 35, the results has been discarded.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
223 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
steel tube but it can completely prevent the local buckling of steel tube. Further the
tested specimen has been cut by using the welding machine, as shown in Figure 10.18.
After cutting the specimen it was observed that the tensile cracks were developed on
Tensile side of the specimen. Those cracks has been shown in Figure 10.19.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
225 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
To start the interaction curve, It was necessary to test the specimen under pure axial
load. So one specimen was tested under purely axial load.
Strain Gauges having length 5 mm and LVDTs having length 100 were attached to Spec-
imen. Figure 10.20 shows the location of the Strain guages and LVDT attached on spec-
imen. As Shown in Figure 10.21, Circular CFT was tested under axial load. four strain
gauge was attached on the specimen. On face A strain gauge was horizontally attached.
On face B strain gauge was vertically attached. On face C Strain gauge was vertically
attached. And on the face D stain gauge was horizontally attached.
When Circular CFT was tested under axial load then ultimate load of resistance was
obtained as 748.75 kN. Experimental strain values on Face A, B, C, and D has been
shown in Figure 10.23 respectively.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
227 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
Figure 10.20: Arrangement of Strain Gauges and LVDT on Circular CFT subjected to
Axial Load
Figure 10.21: Experimental Test Setup for Circular CFT under Axial load
Under the Purely axial load Medium Circular CFT showed the bulging. Local buckling
was also observed on the specimen, as shown in Figure 10.24. Moreover, Steel tube was
started to rupture from the bottom, as shown in Figure 10.25. It is expected that because
of hoop pressure such rupture of steel tube was observed.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 228
Figure 10.22: Axial and Central Displacement of Circular CFT under Axial Load
Figure 10.25: Rupture of Steel Tube and Crushing of Concrete under Axial Load
Figure 10.26: Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Interaction Curve for Circular
CFT
results, while in the case of Eccentric loading experimental results were on average 34%
higher than analytical factored results. Moreover Table 10.7 compares the experimental
results with Unfactored Analytical results. In Unfactored analytical results Partial factor
of Safety for Concrete and Steel has been taken as 1. In case of Axial loading experimental
results are 20 % higher than the unfactored analytical results, While In case of eccentric
loading experimental results are on average 11 % higher than the unfactored analytical
results .Hence It can be concluded that Eurocode-4 Can be used to predict the strength
of the Circular CFT with good accuracy. Moreover, As it was expected, with the increase
in the eccentricity the ultimate axial load reduces. Also Buckling was the major failure
mode of the specimen as shown in Figure 10.27. Moreover Local buckling has also been
observed in some of the specimen. So It can also be concluded that local buckling of
steel tube can be delayed by using the infilled concrete but it can not be prevented. Also
Cutting of the specimen showed the perfect bond between steel tube and infilled concrete.
Table 10.6: Comparison of Analytical Factored Results with Experimental Results for
Circular CFT
Table 10.7: Comparison of Analytical Unfactored Results with Experimental Results for
Circular CFT
Figure 10.27: Failure mode of Circular CFT for various Eccentricity of Loading
Figure 10.29. The Stress strain curve for Tensile Coupon has been shown in Figure 10.30.
The results of the Tensile test has been shown in Table 10.8
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 232
of specimens. Strain gauges of length 5 mm and LVDTs of length 100 mm were attached
on the Specimen. Figure 10.31 shows the locations of strain guages and LVDT attached
on the specimen. While Figure 10.32 Shows the experimental test setup for the Square
CFT under eccentric loading. Three Strain gauge was attached on the different face of
the specimen. On face A, Strain gauge was horizontally attached. On face B and D, It
was Vertically attached. All the strain Guage was attached at the centre of the Specimen.
Results of Strain was obtained using Data Acquisition System having 16 channel. Exper-
imental values of strain for Tensile face, B, Front Face, A, and Compression Face, D, has
been shown in Figure 10.33,Figure 10.34,and Figure 10.35 respectively. In those figure
E10, E20, E30, E35, represents the eccentricity as 10mm, 20mm, 30mm, 35mm respec-
tively. Erroneous strain results was obtained on tensile face B, and compressive face D,
for 30 mm and 20 mm eccentricity respectively. Hence those results were discarded in
plotting Figure 10.33, and Figure 10.35.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 234
Figure 10.31: Arrangement of Strain Gauges and LVDT on Square CFT subjected to
Eccentric Loading
Figure 10.32: Experimental Test Setup for Square CFT subjected to Eccentric Loading
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
235 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
Axial Displacement of specimen has been measured using LVDT. Experimental Axial
displacement has been shown in Figure 10.36. Three LVDTS has been placed along the
tensile face, B, of the Specimen. First LVDT has been attached at the distance of 100
mm from the top of specimen. Second LVDT has been placed at the center of specimen.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 236
The third one was attached at the distance of 50 mm from the bottom of the specimen.
Displacement due to Central, Top, and Bottom LVDT has been shown in Figure 10.37,
10.38, and 10.39 respectively.
steel tube but it can completely prevent the local buckling of steel tube. After the testing
one specimen which was tested for 35 mm eccentricity has been cut by using the welding
machine on Tensile Face, B, and Compressive face, D. After the cutting the specimen
tensile cracks on the concrete was observed on face B side, As shown in Figure 10.41. On
Face D side crushing of concrete was observed, as shown in Figure 10.42. Local buckling
was was observed on face D side. Initially it was assumed that at the region of local
buckling, concrete has been detached from the steel tube but after cutting the section it
was found that concrete was completely intact with the steel tube, as shown in Figure
10.43.
To start the interaction curve, It was necessary to test the specimen under pure axial
load. So one specimen was tested under purely axial load.
Figure 10.44 shows the location of Strain Gauges and LVDTs. And As shown in Fig-
ure 10.45, Square CFT was tested under axial load. On face A two strain gauge was
horizontally attached at distance 30 mm from Top of specimen and at the center of the
specimen. On face B strain gauge was vertically attached. And on the face D stain gauge
was horizontally attached.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
239 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
When Square CFT was tested under axial load then ultimate load of resistance was
obtained as 628.6 kN. Experimental strain values on Face A, B, and D has been shown
in Figure 10.48.
Under the Purely axial load Square CFT showed the bulging. Local buckling was also
observed on the specimen, as shown in Figure 10.49.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 240
Figure 10.43: Attachment of Concrete with the Steel Tube at the Local Buckling Region.
Figure 10.44: Test Setup for Square CFT subjected to Axial Load
Figure 10.45: Experimental Test Setup for Square CFT under Axial Load
steel tube has been considered as 1.5 and 1.15 respectively. When Square CFT is tested for
axial load then experimental results are 72 % higher than the factored analytical results.
When Square CFT is tested under Eccentric loading then on average experimental results
were 60% higher than analytical factored results. Moreover Table 10.11 compares the
experimental results with Unfactored Analytical results. In Unfactored analytical results
Partial factor of Safety for Concrete and Steel has been taken as 1. In case of Axial loading
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
243 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
experimental results are 33 % higher than the unfactored analytical results, While In case
of eccentric loading experimental results are on average 25 % higher than the unfactored
analytical results.Hence It can be concluded that Eurocode-4 can be used to predict the
strength of the Square CFT with good accuracy. Moreover, As it was expected, with the
increase in the eccentricity the ultimate axial load reduces except for 35 mm eccentricity
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 244
Figure 10.50: Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Interaction Curve for Square
CFT
where ultimate Axial load value increases than that of 30 mm eccentricity. Also Buckling
was the major failure mode of the specimen as shown in Figure 10.51. Moreover Local
buckling has also been observed in some of the specimen. So It can also be concluded
that local buckling of steel tube can be delayed by using the infilled concrete but it can
not be prevented. Also Cutting of the specimen showed the perfect bond between steel
tube and infilled concrete. Moreover Infilled Concrete has also took the shape of circular
ring, completely attached with steel tube on compression face D in local buckling region.
Table 10.10: Comparison of Analytical Factored Results with Experimental Results for
Square CFT
Figure 10.51: Failure mode of Square CFT for Various Eccentricity of Loading
Experimental Displacement: LVDT was used to measure the lateral as well as axial
displacement. LVDTs were attached at the Top, Center, and Bottom of the Specimen.
Result for all the LVDT for both the specimen has been shown in Figure 10.54 and Figure
10.55 respectively. In Figure 10.55 lateral displacement at bottom is not shown because
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 248
during the testing LVDT got detached from the specimen. Axial displacement of the both
specimen has been shown in Figure 10.56 and Figure 10.57 respectively.
When Circular Medium CFT was tested under the Axial load, It showed the interaction
for buckling and bulging in its failure mode. Initially Bulging at the bottom of he specimen
was started to appear and once load was started to reduce specimen started to buckle at
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 250
the budged region. Figure 10.58 shows the final failure mode of the specimen.
Figure 10.59: Location of Strain Guage and LVDT for Slender Circular CFT
Experimental Strain: Strain was measure on three face of the specimen. Results
of strain was extracted using the Data Acquisition system having 16 channel. Results of
strain for both specimen has been shown in Figure 10.61 and Figure 10.62 respectively.
In Figure 10.62 results for Axial strain on face B has not been plotted because it got
detached from specimen during the lifting the preparation of test setup.
Experimental Displacement: LVDT was used to measure the lateral as well as axial
displacement. LVDTs were attached at the TOP, Center, and Bottom of the Specimen.
Result for all the LVDT for both the specimen has been shown in Figure 10.63 and Figure
10.64 respectively. Axial displacement of the both specimen has been shown in Figure
10.65 and Figure 10.66 respectively.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 252
10.8 Summary
In this chapter, Experimental Investigation on Circular and square CFT subjected to
eccentric loading has been shown. Medium Circular and Square CFT was tested for ec-
centricity of 10 mm, 20 mm, 30 mm, 35 mm in Universal Testing Machine. Experimental
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
255 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
results then further compared with analytical results. Also, It has been seen that exper-
imental results were on average around 11 % more than the analytical results in case of
Circular CFT. While for Square CFT experimental results were only 25 % higher than the
analytical results. Further Experimental investigation on effect of slenderness on Circular
CFT has been shown. Here also, experimental results were compared against the analyt-
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 256
Table 10.15: Comparison of Analytical and Experimental results for Circular CFT under
Axial Loading
ical results. From the experiment it was found that experimental results were around 29
% higher than analytical results.
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
257 CONCRETE FILLED TUBE
Figure 10.68: Failure Mode of Both Medium and Slender Circular CFT
CHAPTER 10. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOUR OF
CONCRETE FILLED TUBE 258
Chapter 11
11.1 Summary
In the Present Study, design of Rectangular and Circular Concrete Filled Tube, Rectangu-
lar and Circular Concrete Encased Steel Section and Rectangular and Circular Concrete
Encased and Filled Steel Tube is attempted. Both, Simplified method as per EN 1994-1-
1:2004 as well as plastic design method are used. A Computer Programming to develop
P-M Interaction Curve has developed in Visual Basics (VB) for each column, as mention
earlier, for the Steel Sections used in Indian Construction field. A design report that
includes P-M Interaction Charts along with check for Inequality Ratio can be generated
from the developed Computer Program.
Further, an Experimental work has been conducted, wherein Circular and Square Con-
crete Filled Tube are tested under Eccentric Loading. Specimens 10 in numbers equally
distributed both Circular Concrete Filled Steel Tube and Square Concrete Filled Steel
Tube, One considered for loading eccentricity of 0 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm, 30 mm and 35
mm. Specimens are tested using Universal Testing Machine (UTM) of Capacity 1000 kN.
Strain Gauges of 5 mm length are attached on the Tensile Face, Compression Face, and
Front Face of the Specimen. Strain Produced in the Specimen is measured using the Data
Acquisition System of 16 Channel. Failure mode of the Specimens are studied which are
found to be buckling. Further, experimental results are compared with analytical solution
obtained using Computer Program through Visual Basic for Composite Column.
259
CHAPTER 11. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE SCOPE OF THE
WORK 260
11.2 Conclusions
Based on analytical and Experimental Studies as well as parametric studies carried out on
various types of Composite Columns, Following important Conclusions are derived and
summarized in chronological order of study undertaken.
• Measurement of Axial and Central displacement proves that Circular CFT under
axial loading undergoes buckling.
• Axial Strains measured for Circular CFT on two faces shows almost identical oppo-
site results which establishes compression in the section. Similarly, Horizontal Strain
measured on two faces shows identical results establishes homogeneity of section.
• Experimental Study carried out on Circular and Square CFT under eccentric loading
yields high Axial Strength and moment Capacity as compared to analytical axial
strength and moment capacity both with partial safety factor and without partial
safety factor consideration. This is attribute to confinement of concrete with Steel
Tube.
• Axial and transverse strain results of both Circular and Square CFT under Eccen-
tric Loading shows uniform Compression and Tensile Strain on set of bending and
reduction in Loading Capacity with increment in Load Eccentricity.
• Central Displacement measured for both Circular and Square CFT under Eccentric
Loading also proves the fact that bending of the Column is followed by initial axial
Shortening as well as reduced capacity of the Column with increment of Eccentric
Loading.
• It has been observed that Circular CFT undergoes more uniform bending failure as
compared to Square CFT, wherein Former buckles at center while later buckles at
corner bottom end.
CHAPTER 11. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE SCOPE OF THE
261 WORK
• It is also observed from the experimental studies on CFT Specimen that Local
Buckling of the Steel Tube can be delayed by infilled concrete but it cannot be
prevented.
• Dissection of CFT Specimen shows that Concrete do not loose contact with the
tube even at the stage of local buckling which is generally assumed in theoretical
studies.
[1] Johnson R.P “Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete” Blackwell Scientific Pub-
lications,USA.
[2] IS 11384-1985 “ Code of Practice for Composite Construction in Structural Steel and
Concrete”
[3] “Design Guideline for Composite Beam”-The Institute for Steel Development and
Growth(INSDAG).
[4] BS EN 1994-1-1 :2004 “ Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structure : General
Rules and Regulation for Buildings”
[5] Davison B. and Owens G.W. “Steel Designer’s manual ” Wiley Blackwell Publica-
tions, USA.
[7] Patel H., and Panchal V.R., “Development of P-M Interaction Chart for Concrete
Filled Tube (CFT) Composite Columns”, Journal of Advance Research in Science
and Engineering, Volume 5, Issue No. 4, 2016.
[8] Leon R.T. “ Design of Composite Columns : The American Approach” Arabian
Journal for Science and Engineering, SPRINGER, 37, 381-398,2012
[9] Park H., Lee H.,Choi I., Kim S., and Park S., “Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column
Encased with Thin Precast Concrete”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE,
141(12), 2015.
[10] Chen C., Wang C., and Sun H., “Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of
Full Encased Steel-Concrete Composite Columns”, Journal of Structural Engineers,
SPRINGER, 140(6), 2014.
[11] Verma A., Ricles J., Sause R., and Lu L., “Experimental Behavior of High Strength
Square Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Beam-Columns”, Journal of Structural Engineer-
ing, ASCE,128(3), 309-318, 2002.
[12] Ekmekyapar T., and Baraa J.M., “Experimental Behavior of Circular Concrete Filled
Steel Tube Columns and Design Specifications” Journal of Thin-Walled Structures,
ELSEVIER, 105, 220-230, 2016.
263
BIBLIOGRAPHY 264
[13] Zhao G., ZHANG M., and Yong-he L., “Behavior of Slender Steel Concrete Com-
posite Columns in Eccentric Loading” Journal of Shanghai University, SPRINGER,
13(6), 481-488, 2009
[14] Kim C., Park H., Chung K. and Choi I., “Eccentric Axial Load Testing for Concrete-
Encased Steel Columns using 800 MPa Steel and 100 MPa Concrete” Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE, 138, 1019-1031, 2012.
[15] Giakoumelis G., and Lam D., “Axial Capacity of Circular Concrete-Filled Tube
Columns” Journal of Construction Steel Research, ELSEVIER, 60, 1049-1068, 2003.
Appendix A
A.1 General
Appendix A includes the details of experimental results related to different types of com-
posite column under Axial and Eccentric Loading.
Pu Axial Displacement
(kN) (mm)
0 0
50 0.57
100 0.92
150 1.11
200 1.48
250 1.96
300 3.6
325 6
330 7.7
331.3 8.8
265
APPENDIX A. EXPERIMENTAL TESTING RESULTS OF CONCRETE FILLED
TUBE UNDER AXIAL AND ECCENTRIC LOADING 266
B.1 General
Coding for the design of Six different type of composite column, which includes Rectan-
gular CFT, Circular CFT, Rectangular full concrete encased Steel Section, Circular Full
Concrete Encased Steel Section, Rectangular Concrete encased and filled steel tube, and
Circular Concrete encased and filled steel tube has been done. Here the coding for only
Rectangular CFT has been given. The coding has been done in Visual Studio Basics.
The Programming has been done according to the Eurocode-4. Moreover, User can de-
sign composite column for several load cases simultaneously. Further this program is also
linked with the Microsoft Excel through which user can obtained the design report easily.
281
B.2 Coding for Design of Rectangular CFT
Imports ZedGraph
Imports System.IO
Imports System.Text
Imports System.Data.DataTable
Imports Excel = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel
Public Class Form1
Dim B As Double
Dim D As Double
Dim t As Double
Dim fck As Double
Dim yst As Double
Dim fy As Double
Dim pc As Double
Dim ps As Double
Dim pr As Double
Dim fcd As Double
Dim fyd As Double
Dim fsd As Double
Dim Aa As Double
Dim dia As Double
Dim Ass As Double
Dim Ac As Double
Dim Nplrd As Double
Dim delta As Double
Dim pt As Double
Dim Iax As Double
Dim Iay As Double
Dim Isx As Double
Dim Isy As Double
Dim Icx As Double
Dim Icy As Double
Dim y1 As Double
Dim y2 As Double
Dim LB As Double
Dim LBE As Double
Dim Ec As Double
Dim Ea As Double
Dim Es As Double
Dim EIx As Double
Dim EIy As Double
Dim Ncrx As Double
Dim Ncry As Double
Dim L As Double
Dim Lemdax As Double
Dim lemday As Double
Dim xiax As Double
Dim xiay As Double
Dim zetax As Double
Dim zetay As Double
Dim Np As Double
Dim Nplx As Double
Dim Nply As Double
Dim ANplx As Double
Dim AMplx As Double
Dim CNplx As Double
Dim DNplx As Double
Dim BNplx As Double
Dim BMrdx As Double
Dim CMrdx As Double
Dim DMrdx As Double
Dim ANply As Double
Dim AMply As Double
Dim CNply As Double
Dim DNply As Double
Dim BMrdy As Double
Dim BNply As Double
Dim CMrdy As Double
Dim DMrdy As Double
Dim Wpsx As Double
Dim Wpcx As Double
Dim Wpax As Double
Dim Wpsy As Double
Dim Wpcy As Double
Dim Wpay As Double
Dim hnx As Double
Dim hny As Double
Dim Wcnx As Double
Dim Wanx As Double
Dim Wsnx As Double
Dim Mnx As Double
Dim Wcny As Double
Dim Wany As Double
Dim Wsny As Double
Dim Mny As Double
Dim Nu As Double
Dim MuxT_inp As Double
Dim MuyT_inp As Double
Dim MuxB_inp As Double
Dim MuyB_inp As Double
Dim Muxmax_inp As Double
Dim Muymax_inp As Double
Dim X As Integer
Dim MuxL As Double
Dim MuyL As Double
Dim alphax As Double
Dim alphay As Double
Dim alpha As Double
Dim C1 As Double
Dim C2 As Double
Dim C3 As Double
Dim T1 As Double
Dim T2 As Double
Dim M1 As Double
Dim M2 As Double
Dim M3 As Double
Dim CC As Double
Dim TT As Double
Dim Nxx(502) As Double
Dim Mxx(502) As Double
Dim Nyy(502) As Double
Dim Myy(502) As Double
Dim i As Integer
Dim j As Integer
Dim k As Integer
Dim ii As Integer
Dim jj As Integer
Dim kk As Integer
Dim iii As Integer
Dim jjj As Integer
Dim kkk As Integer
Dim iiii As Integer
Dim jjjj As Integer
Dim kkkk As Integer
Dim cover As Double
Dim h As Integer
Dim p As Integer
Dim pp As Integer
Dim q As Integer
Dim qq As Integer
Private Sub Form1_Load(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
Zed.Hide()
Zed2.Hide()
End Sub
Private Sub fcktext_SelectedIndexChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
fcktext.SelectedIndexChanged
fck = Val(fcktext.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub pconcretetext_TextChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
pconcretetext.TextChanged
pc = Val(pconcretetext.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub ysttext_SelectedIndexChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
ysttext.SelectedIndexChanged
yst = Val(ysttext.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub psteelsection_TextChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
psteelsection.TextChanged
ps = Val(psteelsection.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub fytext_SelectedIndexChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
fytext.SelectedIndexChanged
fy = Val(fytext.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub covertext_TextChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
covertext.TextChanged
cover = Val(covertext.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub preinforcement_TextChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
preinforcement.TextChanged
pr = Val(preinforcement.Text)
End Sub
Private Sub widthtext_TextChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles
widthtext.TextChanged
B = Val(widthtext.Text)
End Sub
ElseIf (((0.5 * D - y1) < hnx) And (hnx <= 0.5 * D)) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * ((B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (B * (D - hnx) - (B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t))
C3 = (fsd / 1000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = (fsd * Ass / 1000) - C3
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((B - 2 * t) * (hnx - t) * (0.5 * D - t - 0.5 *
(hnx - t)) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y1)
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * (B * hnx * (0.5 * D - 0.5 * hnx) - (B - 2 * t)
* (hnx - t) * (0.5 * D - t - 0.5 * (hnx - t)))
M3 = (2 * fsd / 1000000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y1)
ElseIf (0.5 * D < hnx) And hnx < (0.5 * D + y1) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * ((B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (B * (D - hnx) - (B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t))
C3 = (fsd / 1000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = (fsd * Ass / 1000) - C3
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t) * (0.5 * D - t - 0.5
* (D - hnx - t)) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y1)
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * (B * (D - hnx) * (0.5 * D - 0.5 * (D - hnx)) -
(B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t) * (0.5 * D - t - 0.5 * (D - hnx - t)))
M3 = (2 * fsd / 1000000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y1)
ElseIf ((0.5 * D + y1) < hnx) And (hnx < (D - t)) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * ((B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t))
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (B * (D - hnx) - (B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t))
C3 = 0
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = (fsd * Ass / 1000)
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t) * (0.5 * D - t - 0.5
* (D - hnx - t)))
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * (B * (D - hnx) * (0.5 * D - 0.5 * (D - hnx)) -
(B - 2 * t) * (D - hnx - t) * (0.5 * D - t - 0.5 * (D - hnx - t)))
M3 = 0
jj = 1
kk = 1
ii = 1
For Me.hny = 0 To B Step (B / 500)
If hny = 0 Then
C1 = fcd * Ac / 1000
C2 = fyd * Aa / 1000
C3 = fsd * Ass / 1000
T1 = 0
T2 = 0
M1 = 0
M2 = 0
M3 = 0
ElseIf ((t < hny) And (hny < (0.5 * B - y2))) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * (Ac - (D - 2 * t) * (hny - t))
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (D * (B - hny) - (D - 2 * t) * (B - t - hny))
C3 = (fsd / 1000) * (4 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = 0
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5 *
(hny - t)))
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * ((D * hny * (0.5 * B - 0.5 * hny)) - (D - 2 *
t) * (hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5 * (hny - t)))
M3 = 0
ElseIf (((0.5 * B - y2) < hny) And (hny <= 0.5 * B)) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (D * (B - hny) - (D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t))
C3 = (fsd / 1000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = (fsd * Ass / 1000) - C3
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5 *
(hny - t)) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y2)
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * (D * hny * (0.5 * B - 0.5 * hny) - (D - 2 * t)
* (hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5 * (hny - t)))
M3 = (2 * fsd / 1000000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y2)
ElseIf (0.5 * B < hny) And hny < (0.5 * B + y2) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (D * (B - hny) - (D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t))
C3 = (fsd / 1000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia)
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = (fsd * Ass / 1000) - C3
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5
* (B - hny - t)) - 2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y2)
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * (D * (B - hny) * (0.5 * B - 0.5 * (B - hny)) -
(D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5 * (B - hny - t)))
M3 = (2 * fsd / 1000000) * (2 * 0.785 * dia * dia * y2)
ElseIf ((0.5 * B + y2) < hny) And (hny < (B - t)) Then
C1 = (fcd / 1000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t))
C2 = (fyd / 1000) * (D * (B - hny) - (D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t))
C3 = 0
T1 = (fyd * Aa / 1000) - C2
T2 = (fsd * Ass / 1000)
M1 = (fcd / 1000000) * ((D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5
* (B - hny - t)))
M2 = (2 * fyd / 1000000) * (D * (B - hny) * (0.5 * B - 0.5 * (B - hny)) -
(D - 2 * t) * (B - hny - t) * (0.5 * B - t - 0.5 * (B - hny - t)))
M3 = 0
For Me.ii = jj To kk
Nyy(ii) = C1 + C2 + C3 - T1 - T2
Myy(ii) = M1 + M2 + M3
Next
jj = jj + 1
kk = kk + 1
Next
'--------------------------------zedchart---------------------------------'
Call creategraph1(Zed)
Call creategraph2(Zed2)
Zed.Show()
Zed2.Show()
X = DataGridView1.RowCount
For Me.L = 0 To X - 2
Nu = DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(1).Value
MuxT_inp = (DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(2).Value)
MuyT_inp = (DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(3).Value)
MuxB_inp = (DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(4).Value)
MuyB_inp = (DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(5).Value)
If MuxT_inp < 0 Then
MuxT_inp = -1 * MuxT_inp
Else
MuxT_inp = MuxT_inp
End If
End If
DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(6).Value = Muxmax_inp
DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(7).Value = Muymax_inp
End If
If ((Nyy(i) < Nu) And (Nyy(i - 1) > Nu)) Then
MuyL = Myy(i - 1) - ((Nyy(i - 1) - Nu) * (Myy(i - 1) - Myy(i)) /
(Nyy(i - 1) - Nyy(i)))
End If
Else
If ((Nxx(i) < Nu) And (Nxx(i - 1) > Nu)) Then
MuxL = Mxx(i - 1) - ((Nxx(i - 1) - Nu) * (Mxx(i - 1) - Mxx(i)) /
(Nxx(i - 1) - Nxx(i)))
End If
If ((Nyy(i) < Nu) And (Nyy(i - 1) > Nu)) Then
MuyL = Myy(i - 1) - ((Nyy(i - 1) - Nu) * (Myy(i - 1) - Myy(i)) /
(Nyy(i - 1) - Nyy(i)))
End If
End If
Next
DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(8).Value = Math.Round(MuxL, 4)
DataGridView1.Rows(L).Cells(9).Value = Math.Round(MuyL, 4)
End Sub
'--------------------------Major Axis Graph-----------------------'
oSheet.Range("L69").Value = fcktext.Text
oSheet.Range("L70").Value = ysttext.Text
oSheet.Range("L71").Value = fytext.Text
oSheet.Range("K74").Value = pconcretetext.Text
oSheet.Range("K75").Value = psteelsection.Text
oSheet.Range("K76").Value = preinforcement.Text
oSheet.Range("K79").Value = Aa
oSheet.Range("K80").Value = Iax
oSheet.Range("K83").Value = Estext.Text
oSheet.Range("K84").Value = Ertext.Text
oSheet.Range("K85").Value = Ectext.Text
oSheet.Range("K88").Value = fcd
oSheet.Range("K89").Value = fyd
oSheet.Range("K90").Value = fsd
oSheet.Range("K93").Value = Ass
oSheet.Range("K94").Value = Ac
oSheet.Range("K97").Value = pt
oSheet.Range("K101").Value = Nplrd
oSheet.Range("K104").Value = delta
oSheet.Range("K108").Value = Isx
oSheet.Range("K109").Value = Icx
oSheet.Range("K110").Value = Iax
oSheet.Range("K114").Value = Isy
oSheet.Range("K115").Value = Icy
oSheet.Range("K116").Value = Iay
oSheet.Range("K119").Value = locallabel.Text
oSheet.Range("K126").Value = EIx
oSheet.Range("K128").Value = Ncrx
oSheet.Range("K129").Value = Lemdax
oSheet.Range("K132").Value = xiax
oSheet.Range("K133").Value = zetax
oSheet.Range("K141").Value = EIy
oSheet.Range("K143").Value = Ncry
oSheet.Range("K144").Value = lemday
oSheet.Range("K147").Value = xiay
oSheet.Range("K148").Value = zetay
iii = 1
jjj = 1
kkk = 1
For Me.hnx = 0 To D Step (D / 500)
Next
oSheet = oBook.Worksheets(3)
iiii = 1
jjjj = 1
kkkk = 1
Next
oBook.save()
oExcel.Quit()
oExcel = Nothing
oBook = Nothing
oSheet = Nothing
MessageBox.Show("REPORT GENERATED")
End Sub
End Class