Leadership, Positive Organizational Behavior, and Psychological Capital
Leadership, Positive Organizational Behavior, and Psychological Capital
Leadership, Positive Organizational Behavior, and Psychological Capital
Organizational Behavior,
and Psychological Capital
MODULE 7
● Leadership is all about making and helping people to reach their maximum
potential and motivating them to reach a common goal.
○ Commitment towards the tasks and duties allocated.
○ Ability to communicate well, taking ownership of the tasks.
○ Honesty and integrity.
○ Ability to make the right decisions and that too at the right time.
○ Creativity and innovation.
○ Ability to inspire others.
2
Intelligence
● General mental ability, g, id often called IQ in everyday language.
● People who have high mental abilities are more likely to be viewed as leaders in
their environment. They tend to have high emotional intelligence too. They
demonstrate a high level of self-awareness, motivation, empathy, and social
skills.
1. Openness- openness to experience
2. Conscientiousness
3. Extraversion
3
4. Agreeableness
5. Neuroticism
Self-Esteem
● The degree to which people are at peace with themselves and have an overall
positive assessment of their self-worth and capabilities seems to be relevant to
whether they will be viewed as a leader.
Integrity
● Leaders whose integrity is questioned lose their trustworthiness, and they hurt
their company’s business along the way.
Leader Behaviors
Researches at Ohio State University of Michigan led to the discovery of two broad
categories of behaviors:
Authentic Leadership
● Embraces the value of its key advice is “be yourself”. We all have different
backgrounds, different life experiences, and different role models.
Servant Leadership
● Defines the leader’s role as serving the needs of others. The primary mission of
the leader is to develop employees and help them reach their goals.
● When situational favorableness is medium, a high LPC leader— one who is able
to personally like coworkers who are difficult to work with—- is more likely to
succeed.
high levels of ability and when decisions to be made are personally relevant to
them.
4. Achievement-oriented leaders set goals for employees and encourage them to
reach their goals. This style is likely to be effective when employees have both
high levels of ability and high levels of achievement motivation.
● Autocratic (A2)
○ The leader independently makes the decision, but the difference with
autocratic style 1 is that the leader has a bit more time and gathers
information from team members or external parties.
8
● Consultative 1 (C1)
○ The leader adopts a consulting role and actively takes the lead to
have team members individually give their opinion about the
situation, the problem,
○
○ and the decision to be made. Here, the team’s involvement is
higher than in the autocratic decision-making style. However, the
decision is still made by the leader; he can choose to disregard the
team’s opinion and input when these haven’t changed his outlook
on the situation.
● Consultative 2 (C2)
○ Where the leader requests the individual opinions from the team
members in the first consulting style, he brings the team together in
a group meeting for a discussion in the second. Ideas and
suggestions are asked for in this meeting. Here, the leader shares
the problem and the situation with the group, but eventually, the
leader is still the one to individually make the decision.
● Group II (G2)
○ The group as a whole makes the decision. The leader presents the
situation and the problem to the group, identifies alternatives, and
makes a consensus decision. The leader purely plays the role of
facilitator and accepts the decision of the group without
considering his own opinion or vision.
Behavioral Theory
● Evolved in the 1950s.
● Ohio State Leadership Studies
○ Consideration: The friendly leaders are attentive and supportive to the
concerns of their subordinates and create an excellent relationship with
them. This was termed as ‘people-oriented behavior’.
○ Initiating structure: The leaders are mostly concerned with achieving
goals and following schedule and work structure. For such leaders,
subordinates are just mere resources that must be utilized through
performance. This was termed as ‘task-oriented behavior’.
● University of Michigan
○ Support
○ Goal emphasis
○ Work facilitation
○ Interaction facilitation
Leadership Styles
● Leadership style is the relatively consistent manner and approach of providing direction,
implementing plans, and motivating people. As seen by the employees, it includes the total
a pattern of explicit and implicit actions performed by their leader (Newstrom, Davis, 1993).
● The first major study of leadership styles was performed in 1939 by Kurt Lewin who led a
group of researchers to identify different styles of leadership (Lewin, Lippit, White, 1939). This
early study has remained quite influential as it established the three major leadership styles:
○ Authoritarian or Autocratic - the leader tells his or her employees the tasks to be done
and the manner of doing it, without getting their advice or feedback; though this style
may sound quite “bossy”, such is suitable during situations where the leader have all
relevant information to solve the problem and employees are well-motivated, but there is
○ Participative or Democratic - the leader allows one or more employees to join in the
the decision-making process, but the leader normally maintains the authority to make final
○ Delegative or Laissez-faire (free-rein) - the leader allows the employees to make the
decisions, however, the leader is still responsible for the decisions that are made; this is
an ideal style to be used if the leader has great trust and confidence in his people
Although good leaders use all three styles, with one of them normally dominant, bad
11
Role of Intelligence
● Intelligence has bben regarded to be fixed at birth and it has been largely used
ass a predictor of school, job, and life success. In recent years nurture versus
nature debates have been renewed on intelligence and there has been some
recognition of multiple intelligences.
Emotional Intelligence
● EI has not yett met the criteria of POB that is why has not yet been a major part of
the latter. The major reaaspn for such is due to the limited research support for a
valid measure of EI and its relationship with performance outcomes. The synergy
created by combining emotion and intelligence becomes a potentially powerful
positively oriented construct for understanding and application to the study and
application of organizationalbehavior.
13