Adi Abdulwahab SDHSONET
Adi Abdulwahab SDHSONET
Adi Abdulwahab SDHSONET
abdulwahabadi@live.com
Abstract- As more and more traffic is being 565 Mbps in Europe. The problem was the high cost of
delivered in Ethernet format, carriers are realizing bandwidth and digital devices. The solution that was
the advantages to converging on a pure Ethernet created then, was a multiplexing technique, allowed for
infrastructure, but are not able to do so with the combining of slightly non synchronous rates.
Ethernet as presently defined. New ITU-T Information is sent over an optical fiber by turning the
Recommendations provide features essential for light off and on in the fiber. The presence of light
operational maintenance of Ethernet networks. indicates a “1” while the absence of light indicates a
Recently proposed mechanisms for configuring “0”. Just knowing this much that we can send and
point-to-point connections in Ethernet networks receive bits across an optical link, but how do we
close another gap between Ethernet and extract the information from those bits? This is where
SONET/SDH networks. Finally, although there are SONET/SDH comes in. SONET/SDH defines the low
a lot of similarities between SONET and SDH, there level framing protocol used on these optical links. By
are some significant differences, especially in “framing”, we mean a block of bits (or octets) which
terminology. For the sake of understanding, I will have a structure, and which utilize some technique
focus this paper on using the SONET terminologies. which allows us to find the boundaries of that frame
structure. Parts of the block may be devoted to
I. INTRODUCTION overhead for the network provider to use to manage the
network.
In the beginning, telephone calls were handled in the
analog domain. Later, digital transmission was
introduced and messages from multiple users could be
transmitted over one single copper pair. Also the need
for faster and better mode of communication lead to the
use of fiber optics which meant that one circuit could
carry many more telephone calls. [2]
Then, optical communication was seen as replacement
for the older wire or microwave communications they
had been using for years. But then they encountered a
practical problem. Vendors of optical communications
equipment had used their own framing techniques on
the optical fiber. Once you selected a vendor, you were
stuck with that vendor for all the equipment in that
optical network. Thus leading to the concept of
standards in optical communications. It’s extremely Table 1: SDH/SONET data rates
important to recognize that the first standards for
optical communications were focused on handling
voice circuits, and especially legacy plesiochronous
channels like DS-1s and DS-3s. If you keep this fact in
mind, many of the odd things about SONET and SDH
will make more sense. At the time these standards were
developed, the tremendous volumes of data traffic had
not appeared and most people did not foresee it.[3]
In the early 80's digital systems became more and more
complex, yet there was huge demand for some features
that were not supported by the existing systems. The
demand was mainly to high order multiplexing through
a hierarchy of increasing bit rates up to 140 Mbps or
II. CHARACTERISTICS OF SDH/SONET Line Terminating Equipment: LTE provides the
function that originates and terminates
Communication between various localized networks is line signals. SONET line terminating equipment can
costly because of differences in digital signal originate, access, modify, or terminate
hierarchies, encoding techniques and multiplexing line overhead in any combination
strategies. For example, the DS1 signals consist of 24
voice signals and one framing bit per frame. It has a III. SHD/SONET FRAME STRUCTURE
rate of 1.544 Mbps. DS1 uses the AMI encoding
scheme, it robs a bit from an eight-bit byte for Each SONET STS-1 (Synchronous Transport Signal)
signaling. Therefore, it has a rate of 56 kbps per Frame is represented by 9 rows of 90 bytes. Each
channel. But with the B8ZS bipolar violation-encoding SONET frame is transmitted row by row in
scheme, every bit is used for transmission. Therefore, it 125usec(microseconds). The math for achieving this
has a rate of 64 Kbps per channel. The CEPT-1(E1) transmission rate is as follows:
signal consist of 30 voice signals and 2 channels for 9 rows x 90Bytes = 810 bytes or 6480 bits. Each frame
framing and signaling, its rate is 2.048 Mbps. is sampled once every 125µsec or 8000 frames/sec
Therefore communication between different networks 8000 frames/sec x 6480 bits/frame = 51.84 Mbits/sec
requires complicated multiplexing / de-multiplexing, (Speed of STS-1 SONET payload envelope).[4]
coding/decoding process to convert a signal from one As illustrated in Figure 2, the STS-1 contains the
format to another format.[5] To solve this problem Synchronous Payload Envelope (SPE) with the data
SONET standardize the rates and formats. The payload(s). Its value is 87 octets. An actual packet or
Synchronous Transport Signal (STS) is the basic cell within an SPE can span multiple SONET Frames.
building block of SONET optical interfaces with a rate In the SONET Frames, the first 3 columns make up the
of 51.84 Mbps. The STS consists of two parts, the STS SONET Transport Overhead, which consists of 27
payload (data, carries the information) and the STS octets. The SONET Transport Over head is divided up
overhead (carries the signaling and protocol such that the STS Section Overhead (SOH) consumes 9
information). octets, while the STS Line Overhead (LOH) consumes
A basic SDH/SONET network requires some basic 18 Octets for a combined SONET Transport Overhead
components. Firstly, 3 add/drop multiplexers that of 27 octets. Both the SOH and LOH are used by the
function as path termination equipment and line SONET Operations, Administration and Maintenance
termination equipment and 2 regenerators. (OA&M) function to support network management
facilities. The SOH fields are used by a receiving
SONET multiplexer to synchronize onto the SONET
signal. The LOH fields are used:
VI. IP OVER SONET SDH networks are mature and have contributed much
to the telecommunications and
The explosive growth in Internet traffic has created the networking industry. Given the rise of Internet and
need to transport IP on high-speed links. In the days of IP/data-oriented traffic, there is room
low traffic volume between IP routers, bandwidth for improvement. Virtual concatenation and LCAS are
partitions over a common interface made it attractive to some of the mechanisms emerging
carry IP over a frame relay and/or an ATM backbone. from the standards track that offer some relief. They
As the traffic grows, it is becoming more desirable to are also tools to help manage the
carry IP traffic directly over the synchronous optical migration toward a more convergent packet-oriented
network (SONET), at least in the core backbone with multiservice network.
very high pairwise demand. Currently, the focus of IP
transport continues to be data-oriented. However, a REFERENCES
significant trend in the industry, with the emergent [1] Cavendish, D. et al.: ‘New transport services for
demand for the support of real-time IP services (e.g., IP next-generation SONET/SDH systems’, IEEE
telephony), is the development of routers with Communication. Mag., 2002, pp. 80–87
sophisticated quality of service (QoS) mechanisms. IP [2] Bonenfant, P., and Rodriguez-Moral, A.: ‘Generic
backbone providers are seeking expedient, cost- framing procedure: The catalyst for efficient data
effective solutions for providing high-capacity over transport network’, IEEE Communication.
interconnection between gigarouters.[4] IP-over- Mag., 2002, pp. 72–79
SONET technology is a leading solution to this need. [3] ITU-T Rec. G.707, ‘Network node interface for
Apart from some flaws with the early IP-over-SONET the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)’, 2000
specification which have subsequently been fixed, IP [4] ITU-T Rec. G.7042, ‘Link capacity adjustment
directly over SONET using HDLC provides a robust, scheme for virtual concatenation’, 2001
reliable, bandwidth-efficient solution for the transport [5] R. Clauberg, P. Buchmann, A. Herkersdorf, and D.
of IP from 155 Mb/s to 2.4 Gb/s rates. Extensions to J. Webb, “Design
the specification will be necessary to extend the methodology and experience with a large
transmission range to 9.8 Gb/s. The Simplified Data communication chip,” IEEE Design and Test of
Link is one such extension. Based on architectural Computers, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 86–94, July–Sept.
motivations, optical wavelength-division multiplexing 2000.
is considered the most cost-effective transport solution
in the long-term evolution of IP backbone networks.