Performance Measurement II Differential Analysis: The Key To Decision Making - Part I
Performance Measurement II Differential Analysis: The Key To Decision Making - Part I
Performance Measurement II Differential Analysis: The Key To Decision Making - Part I
Chapters 10 & 11
9-1
Learning Objective 1
9-2
The Balanced Scorecard
Management translates its strategy into
performance measures that employees
understand and influence.
Financial Customer
Performance
measures
Internal Learning
business and growth
processes
9-3
The Balanced Scorecard - From
Strategy to Performance Measures
Performance Measures
Financial What are our
Has our financial financial goals?
performance improved?
9-7
The Balanced Scorecard ─ Jaguar Example –
Part 1
Profit
Financial
Contribution per car
Internal
Business Number of Time to
options available install option
Processes
Customer satisfaction
with options Satisfaction
Increases
Number of Time to
options available install option
Employee skills in
installing options
9-10
The Balanced Scorecard ─ Jaguar Example –
Part 4
Profit
Results
Contribution per car Contribution
Increases
Customer satisfaction
with options Satisfaction
Increases
Number of Time to
options available install option Time
Decreases
Employee skills in
installing options
9-11
The Balanced Scorecard ─ Jaguar Example –
Part 5
Results
Profit Profits
Increase
If number
Contribution per car Contribution
of cars sold Increases
and contribution
Cars Sold
per car increase, Number of cars sold Increases
profit should
increase. Customer satisfaction
with options
Number of Time to
options available install option
Employee skills in
installing options
9-12
Differential Analysis: The Key to
Decision Making – Part I
Chapter 11
9-13
Learning Objective 2
9-14
Decision Making – Six Key Concepts
Key Concept #1
Every decision involves choosing from among at least two
alternatives. Therefore, the first step in decision making is
to define the alternatives being considered.
9-15
Decision Making – Six Key Concepts
Key Concept #2
Identify the criteria for choosing among alternatives
• Relevant costs and relevant benefits should be considered
when making decisions.
• Irrelevant costs and irrelevant benefits should be ignored
when making decisions.
9-16
Decision Making – Six Key Concepts
Key Concept #3
Differential analysis - ONLY those costs and benefits that differ
between alternatives are relevant in decision.
• A future cost that differs between any two alternatives is
known as a differential cost.
• A future revenue that differs between any two
alternatives is known as differential revenue.
• An incremental cost is an increase in cost between two
alternatives.
• An avoidable cost is a cost that can be eliminated by
choosing one alternative over another.
9-17
Decision Making – Six Key Concepts
Key Concept #4
Sunk costs are always irrelevant when choosing among
alternatives.
A sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and
cannot be changed regardless of what a manager
decides to do.
Key Concept #5
Future costs and benefits that do not differ between alternatives
are irrelevant to the decision-making process.
9-18
Decision Making – Six Key Concepts
Key Concept #6
Opportunity costs also need to be considered and relevant when
making decisions.
• An opportunity cost is the potential benefit that is given up
when one alternative is selected over another.
9-19
Relevant Costs and Benefits
AC2 Canteen
Relevant
Cost
Cost of walking $10 $0
Relevant Satisfaction of
Benefits $60 $40
the taste
9-20
Relevant Costs and Benefits
AC2 Canteen
Price $35 $ 35
Avoidable Cost /
Incremental Cost
Cost of walking $10 $0
Satisfaction of
$60 $40
the taste
9-21
Keys to Successful Decision-Making
9-22
Different Costs for Different Purposes
9-30
Total and Differential Cost Approaches
The management of a company is considering a new labor-saving
machine that rents for $3,000 per year. Data about the company’s
annual sales and costs with and without the new machine are:
Situation Differential
Current With New Costs and
Situation Machine Benefits
Sales (5,000 units @ $40 per unit) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 -
Less variable expenses:
Direct materials (5,000 units @ $14 per unit) 70,000 70,000 -
Direct labor (5,000 units @ $8 and $5 per unit) 40,000 25,000 15,000
Variable overhead (5,000 units @ $2 per unit) 10,000 10,000 -
Total variable expenses 120,000 105,000 -
Contribution margin 80,000 95,000 15,000
Less fixed expense:
Other 62,000 62,000 -
Rent on new machine - 3,000 (3,000)
Total fixed expenses 62,000 65,000 (3,000)
Net operating income $ 18,000 $ 30,000 12,000
9-31
Total and Differential Cost Approaches
As you can see, the only costs that differ between the
alternatives are the direct labor costs savings and the
increase in fixed rental costs.
Situation Differential
Current With New Costs and
Situation Machine Benefits
Sales (5,000 units @ $40 per unit) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 -
Less variable expenses:
We
Direct materials canunits
(5,000 efficiently analyze the
@ $14 per unit) decision 70,000
70,000 by -
Direct labor looking
(5,000 units at
@ $8 anddifferent
the $5 per unit) costs 40,000
and revenues 25,000 15,000
Variable overhead (5,000 units @ $2 per unit) 10,000 10,000 -
Total variable expenses and arrive at the same 120,000 .
solution 105,000 -
Contribution margin 80,000 95,000 15,000
Less fixed expense: Net Advantage to Renting the New Machine
Decrease in direct labor costs (5,000 units @ $3 per unit) $ 15,000
Other 62,000 62,000 -
Increase in fixed rental expenses (3,000)
Rent on newNet machine
annual cost saving from renting the new machine
- $
3,000
12,000
(3,000)
Total fixed expenses 62,000 65,000 (3,000)
Net operating income $ 18,000 $ 30,000 12,000
9-32
Total and Differential Cost Approaches
Why is
differential
approach Reason 1 Reason 2
desirable ?
• Ignoring irrelevant • Mingling irrelevant costs
data can save with relevant costs may
decision makers cause confusion and
tremendous amounts distract attention away
of time and effort. from the information that
is really critical.
9-33
Learning Objective 3
9-34
Adding/Dropping Segments
9-35
Adding/Dropping Segments
9-36
Adding/Dropping Segments
DECISION RULE
Lovell should drop the digital watch segment
only if its profit would increase.
9-37
Adding/Dropping Segments
Contribution Margin
Solution
Contribution margin lost if digital
watches are dropped $ (300,000)
Less fixed costs that can be avoided
Salary of the line manager $ 90,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000 260,000
Net disadvantage $ (40,000)
9-40
Comparative Income Approach
9-41
Comparative Income Approach
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep Drop
Digital Digital
Watches Watches Difference
Sales $ 500,000 $ - $ (500,000)
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000
Salary of line manager 90,000If the digital watch line
Depreciation
Advertising - direct
30,000
100,000
is dropped, the
Rent - factory space 70,000 company loses
General admin. expenses
Total fixed expenses
30,000
380,000
$300,000 in
Net operating loss $ (80,000) contribution margin.
9-42
Comparative Income Approach
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep Drop
Digital Digital
Watches Watches Difference
Sales $ 500,000 $ - $ (500,000)
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 -
Salary of line manager 90,000
Depreciation
Advertising - direct
On the other hand, the general
50,000
100,000
Rent - factory space factory overhead would be the
70,000
General admin. expenses
Total fixed expenses
same under both alternatives, so it
30,000
400,000
Net operating loss is irrelevant.
$ (100,000)
9-43
Comparative Income Approach
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep Drop
Digital Digital
Watches Watches Difference
Sales $ 500,000 $ - $ (500,000)
9-47
Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs
9-48
Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs
9-49
In Business
9-50
Quick Check 1
Consider the following statements:
I. A division's net operating income, after deducting both traceable and
allocated common fixed costs, is negative.
II. The division's avoidable fixed costs exceed its contribution margin.
III. The division's traceable fixed costs plus its allocated common
corporate costs exceed its contribution margin.
9-51
Quick Check 2
A study has been conducted to determine if one of the departments in
Barry Corporation should be discontinued. The contribution margin in the
department is $60,000 per year. Fixed expenses charged to the
department are $75,000 per year. It is estimated that $34,000 of these
fixed expenses could be eliminated if the department is discontinued.
These data indicate that if the department is discontinued, the
company's overall net operating income would:
A) decrease by $26,000 per year
B) increase by $26,000 per year
C) decrease by $15,000 per year
D) increase by $15,000 per year
9-52
End of Chapter 11 (Part I)
9-53