18
18
18
TOPIC-1
The Pallavas
• After the decline of the Sangam Age in the Tamil country, the Kalabhra rule lasted
for about 250 years.
• Thereafter, the Pallavas established their kingdom in Tondaimandalam with its
capital at Kanchipuram. Their rule continued till Tondaimandalam was captured and
annexed by the Imperial Cholas in the beginning of the tenth century A.D.
Political History
• Sirnhavishnu (560-90)
• He is considered the first important Pallava ruler, though Pallavas existed even
during the time of Samudragupta’s invasion of south India.
• He is credited with capturing the territory of the Cholas and humiliating his other
southern neighbours including Ceylon.
• He followed Vaishnavism, as is evident from archaeological evidence.
• Mahendravarman I (590-630)
• During his reign began the long drawn out struggle between the Pallavas and the
Chalukyas.
• He was defeated by Pulakesin II and a part of his kingdom was occupied.
• Narasimhavarman I (630-68)
• He is considered the greatest of the Pallava rulers and is credited with repelling the
second invasion of Pulakesin II, killing him and capturing the Chalukyan capital,
Badami. Hence he assumed the title of `Vatapikonda’ (Conqueror of Vatapi).
• He also defeated the Cholas, the Cheras and the Pandyas, thus becoining supreme in
south India.
• He sent two naval expeditions to Ceylon and helped his ally, a Ceylonese prince, to
capture the throne of Ceylon.
• He was a great builder having constructed Mamallapuram and the various buildings
in it.
• Another significant thing about his reign was the visit of Hiuen Tsang to Kanchi.
• Mahendravarman II (668-70)
• He ruled for a very short period, since he was killed by Chalukya king,
Vikramaditya I (son of Pulakesin II).
• Paramesvaravarman 1 (670-700)
• Narasimhavarman II (100-28)
• His rule is marked by peace and prosperity, literary activity, and the construction of
large and beautiful temples like the Shore temple at Mamallapuram and the
Kailasanatha temple at Kanchi.
• He is also said to have sent embassies to China; and maritime trade flourished
during his reign.
• Paramesvaravarman II (728-31)
• The Pallava kingdom again had to face defeat and humiliation during his reign.
• The Chalukya, Vikramaditya II attacked the Pallava capital and Paramesvaravarman
had to conclude a humiliating treaty with him.
• When the Pallava ruler tried to retaliate, he was killed by the Ganga ally of the
Chalukyas.
• Nandivarman II (731-96)
• The Chalukya, Vikramaditya II again invaded and captured the Pallava capital
during his reign, but Vikramaditya showed consideration and restraint in treating the
vanquished, the only instance of restraint in the whole of the suicidal
Chalukya-Pallava conflict, and withdrew from Kanchi without destroying it.
• Nandi soon strengthened himself and defeated the Chalukya ally, the Gangas. But he
had to meet defeat at the hands of the Pandyas. And after this defeat, he concentrated
on domestic matters.
• He was a worshipper of Vishnu and a great patron of learning.
• During his reign, several old temples were renovated and new ones like the
Vaikuntaperumal temple at Kanchi were constructed.
• Successors of Nandivarman II were Dantivarman (796-847), Nandivarman III
(847-69), Nripatunga (869-99) and Aparajita (899-903).
• The last nail in the coffin was driven by Aditya Chola by defeating Aparajita Pallava
towards the end of the ninth century AD.
• However, the Pallava chiefs continued to exist till the end of the 13th century AD as
feudatories.
Fine Arts
• Music, dance and painting had also developed under the patronage of the Pallavas.
• The Mamandur inscription contains a note on the notation of vocal music.
• The Kudumianmalai inscription referred to musical notes and instruments.
• The Alwars and Nayanmars composed their hymns in various musical notes.
• Dance and drama also developed during this period.
• The sculptures of this period depict many dancing postures.
• The Sittannavasal paintings belonged to this period.
• The commentary called Dakshinchitra was compiled during the reign of
Mahendravarman I, who had the title Chittirakkarapuli.
• According to Bilhana, the author of Vilawnankacharita and the court poet of one of
the Kayani Chalukyan rulers, their original home of the Chalukyas was Ayodhya.
• Also, the later Chalukyan inscriptions lay claim to Ayodhya as their ancestral home,
but all this seems to have been done to claim legitimacy and respectability.
• According to another opinion the Chalukyas were related to Gurjaras, but there is no
direct evidence for this opinion also.
• The Chalukyas, according, to third opinion, were a local Kanarese people, who
improvised into the ruling varna under Brahmanical influence. The third opinion
seems to be more probable, though there is no sufficient evidence for this also.
• The Western Chalukyas ruled over an extensive area in the Deccan for about two
centuries after which the Rashtrakutas became powerful.
• The family of Western Chalukyas had its offshoots like the Eastern Chalukyas of
Vengi and the Chalukyas of Kalyani.
• Pulakesin I was the founder of the Chalukya dynasty who eestablished a small
kingdom with Vatapi or Badami as its capital.
Political History
• Kirtivarman I (566-97)
• The son and successor of Pulakesin I, he expanded the kingdom by wars against the
Kadambas of Banavasi and the Nalas of Bastar.
• Mangalesa (597-609)
• On the death of Kirtivarman, his brother Mangalesa became the regent, since his son,
Pulakesin II was a minor.
• Mangalesa plundered the territories of Gujarat, Khandesh and Malwa.
Administration
• The central government under the Chalukyas of Badami exercised a paternalistic
control over the village administration, which was unlike the administrative practice
of south India.• The main difference between the Chalukyan administration and that
of south Indian rulers like Pallavas and Cholas, was that the south India rulers allowed
a great amount of autonomy to the village administration, while the Chalukyas of
western Deccan did not.
• The Chalukyas of Badami are said to have been a great maritime power.
• Pulakesin II, with 100 ships, attacked and captured the capital of a hostile country.
• The army of the Chalukyas consisted of a small standing army, but mainly of feudal
levies.
• Army officers have been used in civil administration whenever an emergency arose.
Religion
• The Badami Chalukyas were Brahmanical Hindus, but respected other faiths too.
• Great importance came to be attached to Vedic sacrifices and rituals.
• Pulakesin I, the founder of the dynasty, performed the asvamedha sacrifice.
• Quite a few Brahmanical treatises were also composed during this period.
• Apart from the orthodox form of Brahmanism, Puranic religion also grew popular
under the Chalukyas. It was, in fact, this popularity that gave momentum to the
building of temples in honour of Vishnu, Siva and other gods.
• From the account of Hiuen Tsang, it is clear that Buddhism was on the decline in
western Deccan. This decline of Buddhism in western Deccan was in keeping with its
general decline throughout India from the fifth and sixth centuries AD.
• But Jainism, on the other hand, was steadily increasing its popularity, and the
decline of Buddhism, in fact, helped it.
– Among the temples at Badami, the Muktheeswara temple and the Melagutti
Sivalaya are notable for their architectural beauty.
– A group of four rock-cut temples at Badami are marked by high workmanship. The
walls and pillared halls are adorned by beautiful images of gods and human beings.
UNIT-V
Political History
Rajaraja I (985 – 1014 A.D.)
• Under Rajaraja I and his son Rajendra I the Chola power reached its highest point of
glory.
• His military conquests were:
• By these conquests, the extent of the Chola empire under Rajaraja I included the
Pandya, Chera and the Tondaimandalam regions of Tamil Nadu and the Gangavadi,
Nolambapadi and the Telugu Choda territories in the Deccan and the northern part of
Ceylon and the Maldive Islands beyond India.
• Rajaraja assumed a number of titles like Mummidi Chola, Jayankonda and
Sivapadasekara.
• Rajaraja was a devout follower of Saivism.
• Rajaraja completed the construction of the famous Rajarajeswara temple or
Brihadeeswara temple at Tanjore in 1010 A.D.
• Rajaraja also helped in the construction of a Buddhist monastery at Nagapattinam.
– Mahinda V, the king of Sri Lanka attempted to recover from the Cholas the
northern part of Ceylon. Rajendra defeated him and seized the southern Sri
Lanka. Thus the whole of Sri Lanka was made part of the Chola Empire.
– He reasserted the Chola authority over the Chera and Pandya countries.
– He defeated Jayasimha II, the Western Chalukya king and the river
Tungabadhra was recognised as the boundary between the Cholas and
Chalukyas.
– His most famous military enterprise was his expedition to north India. The
Chola army crossed the Ganges by defeating a number of rulers on its way.
Rajendra defeated Mahipala I of Bengal. To commemorate this successful
north-Indian campaign Rajendra founded the city of Gangaikondacholapuram
and constructed the famous Rajesvaram temple in that city. He also excavated
a large irrigation tank called Cholagangam on the western side of the city.
– Another famous venture of Rajendra was his naval expeditionto Kadaram or
Sri Vijaya. It is difficult to pin point the real object of the expedition.
Whatever its objects were, the naval expedition was a complete success. A
number of places were occupied by Chola forces. But it was only temporary
and no permanent annexation of these places was contemplated. He assumed
the title Kadaramkondan.
• Rajendra I had put down all rebellions and kept his empire intact and at the death of
Rajendra I the extent of the Chola Empire was at its peak.
• The river Tungabadhra was the northern boundary. The Pandya, Kerala and Mysore
regions and also Sri Lanka formed part of the empire.
• He gave his daughter Ammangadevi to the Vengi Chalukya prince and further
continued the matrimonial alliance initiated by his father.
• Rajendra I assumed a number of titles, the most famous being Mudikondan,
Gangaikondan, Kadaram Kondan and Pandita Cholan.
• Like his father he was also a devout Saiva and built a temple for that god at the new
capital Gangaikondacholapuram.
• He made liberal endowments to this temple and to the Lord Nataraja temple at
Chidambaram.
• He was also tolerant towards the Vaishnava and Buddhist sects.
• After Rajendra I, the greatness of the Chola power was preserved by rulers like
Kulottunga I and Kulottunga III.
• Kulottunga I was the grandson of Rajendra I through his daughter Ammangadevi.
• Kulottunga I succeeded the Chola throne and thus united the Vengi kingdom with
the Chola Empire.
• During Kulottunga I reign Sri Lanka became independent. Subsequently, Vengi and
the Mysore region were captured by the western Chalukyas.
• Kulottunga I sent a large embassy of 72 merchants to China and maintained cordial
relations with the kingdom of Sri Vijaya.
• Under Kulottunga III the central authority became weak.
• The rise of the feudatories like the Kadavarayas and the emergence of the Pandya
power as a challenge to Chola supremacy contributed to the ultimate downfall of the
Chola Empire.
• Rajendra III was the last Chola king who was defeated by Jatavarman
Sundarapandya II.
• The Chola country was absorbed into the Pandya Empire.
Chola Administration
Central Government
• The Cholas had an excellent system of administration.
• The emperor or king was at the top of the administration.
• The extent and resources of the Chola Empire increased the power and prestige of
monarchy.
• The big capital cities like Tanjore and Gangaikondacholapuram, the large royal
courts and extensive grants to the temples reveal the authority of the king.
• They undertook royal tours to increase the efficiency of the administration.
• There was elaborate administrative machinery comprising various officials called
perundanam and sirudanam.
Revenue
• The land revenue department was known as puravuvarithinaikkalam.
• All lands were carefully surveyed and classified for assessment of revenue.
• The residential portion of the village was called ur nattam. These and other lands
such as the lands belonging to temples were exempted from tax.
• Besides land revenue, there were tolls and customs on goods taken from one place to
another, various kinds of professional taxes, dues levied on ceremonial occasions like
marriages and judicial fines.
• During the hard times, there were remission of taxes and Kulottunga I became
famous by abolishing tolls and earned the title – Sungam Tavirtta Cholan.
• The main items of government expenditure were the king and his court, army and
navy, roads, irrigation tanks and canals.
Military Administration
• The Cholas maintained a regular standing army consisting of elephants, cavalry,
infantry and navy.
• About seventy regiments were mentioned in the inscriptions.
• The royal troops were called Kaikkolaperumpadai.
• Within this there was a personal troop to defend the king known as Velaikkarar.
• Attention was given to the training of the army and military cantonments called
kadagams existed.
• The Cholas paid special attention to their navy.
• The naval achievements of the Tamils reached its climax under the Cholas.
• They controlled the Malabar and Coromandal coasts. In fact, the Bay of Bengal
became a Chola lake for sometime.
Provincial Administration
• The Chola Empire was divided into mandalams and each mandalam into valanadus
and nadus.
• In each nadu there were a number of autonomous villages.
• The royal princes or officers were in charge of mandalams.
• The valanadu was under periyanattar and nadu under nattar.
• The town was known as nagaram and it was under the administration of a council
called nagarattar.
Village Assemblies
• The system of village autonomy with sabhas and their committees developed
through the ages and reached its culmination during the Chola rule.
• Two inscriptions belonging to the period of Parantaka I found at Uttiramerur provide
details of the formation and functions of village councils. According to them village
was divided into thirty wards and each was to nominate its members to the village
council.
• The qualifications to become a ward member were:
a. Those who had been members of the committees for the past three years.
b. Those who had failed to submit accounts as committee members.
c. Those who had committed sins.
d. Those who had stolen the property of others.
• From the persons duly nominated, one was to be chosen for each ward by kudavolai
system for a year.
• The names of eligible persons were written on palm-leaves and put into a pot.
• A young boy or girl would take out thirty names each for one ward.
• They were divided into six variyams such as samvatsaravariyam, erivariyam, thotta
variyam, pancha variyam, pon variyam and puravuvari variyam to take up six
different functions of the village administration.
• The committee members were called variyapperumakkal.
• They usually met in the temple or under a tree and passed resolutions.
• The number of committees and ward members varied from village to village.
Socio-economic Life
UNIT-V
TOPIC-3
Pandyan Empire
Pandyan Kingdom was located in Tamil Nadu, South India. It started around 6th
century BC and ended around the 15th century AD.
Pandyan kingdom extended during the Sangam age comprised the present districts of
Madurai, Tirunelveli, Ramnad in Tamil Nadu. Madurai was the capital
city and Korkai the chief Port of the kingdom, which became the great centres of
trade and commerce. The Sangam literature provides a long list of Pandyan kings out
of which some of them became most popular. Madhukudumi
Peruvazhthi performed many sacrifices to celebrate his victories. Therefore, he was
given a title Palyagasalai.
Another Pandyan king Bootha Pandiyan was a great warrior and also the patron of
Tamil poets. Ariyappadaikadantha Nedunjeliyan was also a famous Pandyan ruler. He
gave death sentence to the hero of Silappathigaram (epic), Kovalan, by mistake for
which he gave his own life when he came to know the truth.Another important ruler
was Thalaiyalanganathu Nedunjeliyan who was believed to have ruled around 210
A.D, defeated the combined forces of Chera, Chola and five other minor states at a
place called Thalaiyalanganam, which is mentioned in a 10th century inscription. He
also patronized a number of Tamil poets including Mangudi Maruthanar. The
Pandyan kingdom was having trade with Roman Empire which profited traders and
made kingdom wealthy and prosperous. Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan ruled Pandyan
Empire from 1251-61 A.D was known as ‘Second Rama’ for plundering the islands of
Sri Lanka.The Pandyan rule started declining from the early 14th century when
dispute arose between the claimants for succession of throne and one of claimant ask
for a help from Delhi sultan, Alauddin Khilji, which resulted in an invasion by sultan
under the leadership of Malik Kafur. The Muslim invasion led to the disappearance of
the Pandyans.
Battle of Talikota
However, these classical traditions were entirely pre-Christian in spirit, character and
expression. And it makes sense that they were revived during the Renaissance period
because this period was singularly characterised by a rejection of and rebellion against
the stranglehold of the Church that had pushed Europe into the Heart of Darkness for
at least a thousand years.
What we today know as the finer aspects of modern Western civilisation are therefore
the combined appropriations of this pre-Christian heritage. Indeed, right from the
names of behemoth corporations of today like Oracle, Amazon, and Nike, the
influence of ancient Greece and Rome have been indelibly, subconsciously implanted
in the DNA of the modern West and westernised Indians as well.
This cultural phenomenon applies in equal measure to one of the world’s greatest
empires: the Vijayanagara Empire. If Abhijata (pristine) Hinduism continues to
survive in whatever form in South India today, the entire credit for it still rests on the
shoulders of this Empire for building such a sturdy foundation way back in the mid
14th century CE.
One can still witness the numerous evidences of this grandeur in the temples built
during that era (some of which continue to flourish even today), in Dharmic rituals,
endowments, holdovers of administrative concepts, in the arts, in the way festivals are
celebrated (Mysore Dussera being the greatest and world-renowned example) and so
on.
The period during which the foundations for the Vijayanagara Empire were laid by
the intrepid Harihara and Bukkaraya (known as the Sangama Brothers) under the
spiritual guidance of Maharshi Vidyaranya was truly happening and exciting. Not
only did they lead from the front but inspired countless others to do the same.
O King! The city, which is called Madhurapuri for its honeyed loveliness, has
now become the city of cruel beasts; it now lives up to its earlier name of
Vyaghrapuri, the city of tigers because humans don’t dwell there (anymore). [1]
Those temples of Gods, which used to reverberate with the sacred melody of the
mridangam, now echo the dreadful howls of jackals. [5]
During the days of Pandyas, our women used to bathe in [river] Taamraparni,
whose waters turned white from the sandal-paste applied to their breasts. My
lord! Now she’s coloured only in red from the currents of blood flowing into her
from all the cows slaughtered by its wicked occupiers all over the country. [13]
O King! I cannot bear to look at the countenance of those Dravida ladies who
were bounteously endowed with beauty. Ravished horribly by the scourging
Turushkas, these delicate women now sport lifeless lips and exhale hot breaths,
and their abundant tresses that have come undone are painful to the eyes. I don’t
have the words to describe the suffering and dishonour painted on their faces,
which know neither redemption nor protection. [15]
Gangadevi’s lament did not fall on deaf ears. By 1370 CE, a determined Kumara
Kampana had succeeded in annihilating the sputtering vestiges of the
infamous Madurai Sultanate by routing Nasir-ud-din, the so-called Sultan who ruled
Madurai.
This period also witnessed swift conquests and the beginning of the consolidation of
all territories in South India and eventually paved the way for making Vijayanagara
the most unassailable and prosperous empire in South India for the next two
hundred-odd years. The Vijayanagara Empire thus stood as the sweeping and
insurmountable political Vindhya shielding all of South India from the relentless and
barbaric depredations of Muslim armies.
Yet, as the poet says, when fate summons, monarchs must obey. And so is it with
empires. As with the downfall of the Roman Empire, so with the downfall of the
Vijayanagara Empire.
It occurred on January 23, 1565 in that fateful Battle of Talikota, or what I call
the Sunset Battle of the Hindus.
We can reasonably trace the seeds of this Sunset Battle to “Aliya” (literally:
son-in-law) Rama Raya, the son-in-law of Krishnadevaraya. Rama Raya was a valiant
commander, a tactful and fearsome warrior who had led several successful campaigns
under Krishnadevaraya. He was also an able administrator and a skilful diplomat.
Rama Raya was also endowed with a fatal flaw: an unquenchable thirst for power,
haughtiness and overconfidence in his own abilities. He was also given to excessive
sensual indulgence.
After Krishnadevaraya’s death, the throne passed on to his younger brother, Achyuta
Raya who died in 1542 CE. His nephew, Sadashiva Raya was then a minor. Rama
Raya seized this opportunity and eventually put Sadashiva Raya under virtual house
arrest.
Acting as regent, he quickly took control of state power and replaced officers in
important positions with people personally loyal to him. However, till the end, he
could not become king because he had not descended from the royal lineage of the
Rayas of Vijayanagara.
However, his luck did eventually run out when the Sultans realised that they had a
common foe in Rama Raya.
In 1589 CE, Qasim Ferishta took up a position with the Sultan of Bijapur and then
wrote the history of the Talikota Battle, 24 years after the incident. Some historians do
not consider this as an eyewitness or accurate account because a quarter of a century
is long enough for several legends and cooked-up historical tales to emerge.
Around 1560 CE, Rafiuddin Shirazi joined the services of the Bijapur ruler Ali Adil
Shah and was eventually promoted to the post of prime minister. He lived for 24 years
after the Talikota Battle and left behind eyewitness accounts of the battle.
This is also corroborated by Mirza Ibrahim Zubairi, who invokes his account of the
battle in his Busateenus-Salateen.
Upon the request of Ali Adil Shah, Rama Raya marched against the Ahmednagar
kingdom and successfully raided it. Equally, on occasion, the Nizam of Ahmednagar
and Qutub Shah of Golconda had sought Rama Raya’s assistance to teach Ali Adil
Shah a lesson.
In the foregoing instance, Rama Raya successfully wrested the Raichur doab on
behalf of these two kings, angering Ali Adil Shah who then sought the advice of his
close aides. Two of these aides, Kishwar Khan Lary and Abu Turab Shirazi
recommended an alliance of all the Bahamani kings temporarily forgetting mutual
hostilities. And further that this grand alliance should march against Rama Raya. As
we’ve seen, Qutub Shah of Golconda and Hussain Nizam Shah of Ahmednagar had
tasted bitter defeat at the hands of Rama Raya on several occasions. Indeed, after
Rama Raya’s successful campaign against him on behalf of Ali Adil Shah of Bijapur,
Nizam Shah was so stricken with mortal fear that he abandoned even the thought of
marching against Adil Shah.
And so, the Sultans of Bijapur, Ahmednagar and Golconda entered into a joint pact.
Accordingly, Chand Bibi (popularly known for her defence of Ahmednagar against
the forces of the Mughal emperor, Akbar), daughter of Hussain Nizam Shah was
married to Ali Adil Shah I of Bijapur, a marriage of political expediency. Likewise,
Murtajabiz the son of the Sultan of Ahmednagar, was married to Adil Shah’s sister.
All parties of this alliance agreed to wage war against Vijayanagara after the marriage
celebrations were over.
That done, Adil Shah sent an emissary to Rama Raya’s court with a message: give up
the key forts of Raichur and Mudgal. Rama Raya sent the emissary back with a
contemptuous refusal. The same contempt was reserved for the emissaries that
followed.
The combined forces of Bijapur, Ahmednagar and Golconda began to march towards
Vijayanagara. Because Bidar’s Sultan, Burhan Imadul Mulk was a sworn enemy of
Hussain Nizam Shah, he refused to join the coalition. The coalition army eventually
reached and pitched camp at a spot near Talikota, which fell under the domain of the
Bijapur Sultan.
The battle that followed occurred at Tavarekere (today’s Tangadi or Rakkasatangadi),
southwest of Talikota.
He followed this up with another force of sizeable strength and numbers. Historians
peg the total strength of the Vijayanagara military force as comprising one lakh
horsemen and five lakh infantry.
The task of the advance contingent was to prevent the Bahamani forces from crossing
the Krishna river. The force had massive canons forming the leading front.
Additionally, sturdy forts at strategic points along the Krishna river were designed to
impede the enemy’s attempts at crossing it.
Spies of the Bahamani army reported that there were some places situated about
two-three miles along the river line that were unguarded and could help the army
cross the river.
Adil Shah conferred with his allies and sought their permission to conduct the war by
stealth because whatever Rama Raya’s other faults, the Vijayanagara army was a
formidable fighting machine, and all of his adversaries had tasted humiliating defeats
at his hands in the past.
Accordingly, Adil Shah ordered his men to adopt this strategy: pretend to attempt
crossing the river at a few points and then turn back and then actually try to cross the
river from a different place.
When the Vijayanagara army witnessed this, they realised that the enemy’s attempts
were futile and abandoned their existing positions, thereby falling neatly into the
enemy’s trap. Adil Shah’s strategy proved hugely successful.
The Bahamani army quickly tied up the canons with strong chains. In his cocksure
certainty that this was a minor battle, Rama Raya had not even made a Plan B, forget
a contingency plan.
Neither did he learn any lesson when he saw that he was outwitted. He led from the
front and ordered his army to randomly attack the Bahamani force. There was no
strategy, no discipline.
Even worse, he didn’t heed the advice of his ministers who had pleaded with him to to
mount a horse. Instead Rama Raya sat in his throne on the elephant. He bombastically
motivated his soldiers with the war cry, “We are not cowards to be scared of this
insignificant war! Go on, fight!”
As blood-curdling as the cry was, it simply didn’t work. The scattered and
indisciplined manner in which his soldiers fought began to take its toll. Rama Raya
quickly realised this, dismounted, and spread out a heap of enormous quantities of
gold, precious stones, and coins and declared that the one who displays the maximum
valour would be rewarded with untold wealth and would be royally honoured.
This motivation helped breathe fresh zest into the soldiers who began hacking their
way into the Bahamani force. The left flank of the Bahamani force was decimated and
what was left of it began to retreat.
This turn of events greatly worried Nizam Shah, Qutub Shah and Ali Barid.
Nizam Shah put up the Rahtaanat sign in front of his tent. This sign signifies a
holy Islamic oath that the Muslim soldier would die in jihad and attain jannat (heaven).
It also meant that no matter what would happen, no Muslim soldier should run away
from this Jihad.
And so, the combined forces of Nizam Shah, Qutub Shah, Ali Adil Shah and Ali
Barid attacked the “Hindu army which was continually gaining an upper hand”.
Ali Adil Shah managed to chase away Rama Raya’s brother, Tirumala Raya all the
way up to Kanauj [it is unclear which place this refers to but it is definitely not the
famed Kanauj in Uttar Pradesh]. He then turned his attention to Rama Raya. He
attacked Rama Raya from the rear while Qutub Shah and Nizam Shah faced him head
on.
Even as the battle raged on, an enormous chunk of Muslim soldiers in Rama Raya’s
army either defected to the enemy camp or became deserters by refusing to fight on
the side of the “infidel” army.
This was apparently motivated by the treacherous Gilani Brothers who were among
Rama Raya’s trusted commanders. There are varying versions of this slice of the
battle but constraints of space don’t permit discussing this aspect in any detail.
Faced with this kind of multi-pronged assault, panic struck Rama Raya when he
realised that there was no force defending his right flank. Some historians aver that
this was because he was unaware of Tirumala Raya’s flight away from the battle.
Meanwhile, a lowly officer (havaldar) named Rumi Khan fired two canons at the
Vijayanagar force, taking a heavy toll and scattering the soldiers. He then climbed up
his elephant and charged at Rama Raya’s elephant. In the ensuing fight, Rama Raya’s
bodyguard was killed and the 90-year old head of the Empire fell down from his
palanquin, wounded. He was surrounded by enemy soldiers who didn’t know who he
was including Rumi Khan who had toppled Rama Raya’s elephant.
But the game was given away when the Brahmin Dalapatiraya yelled, “Stop! Don’t
you dare harm Rama Raya!”
And just like that, Rumi Khan realised that his hour of triumph was etched in these
words. With all the contempt he could muster, Rumi Khan had Rama Raya lifted by
the trunk of his elephant and presented him before Nizam Shah. The Sultan, in a bid
to humiliate Rama Raya, offered him a seat and mocked, “All well?”
The nonagenarian said nothing; he merely touched his forehead (indicating that fate
had reduced him to this). At this point, the court physician Hakim Kasim Baig
stormed into the tent and said, “What are you doing! Exchanging pleasantries with a
captured prisoner? Kill him now! If the Bijapur Sultan comes here, he will spare
him.”
Nizam Shah immediately chopped off Rama Raya’s head, affixed it to the tip of a
spear and had it paraded outside. It is said that Rama Raya’s severed head was thrown
in a gutter in Bijapur; other accounts hold that it was sent to Kashi.
The sight of the slain Raya’s head propelled a full-blown retreat of the Vijayanagara
army. However, they were unable to flee very far. The morale of the Muslim army
which had redoubled after Rama Raya’s death now reached a feverish heat of
murderous passion when it spotted the Hindu army retreating.
The warriors of Islam chased them and slaughtered everyone in sight. An area
spanning about twenty miles was littered with dead bodies, the earth bloody. The
victorious soldiers of Islam took untold riches in the form of coins, jewellery and
slaves: both male and female.
One account says that it took twelve days to count the dead bodies that lay in the
region from “Ali Kandi” to Vijayanagara and estimates the number of people killed
as Ten Lakh.
In the six months that the Bahamani coalition was camped in Vijayanagara, every
single house, temple, building and habitation “in a radius spanning twenty
leagues was burned down.”
Rear View of a Random Temple at Hampi. Pic shot by Sandeep Balakrishna
The grand Hampi was reduced to a wasteland. Even today, it is known by the tragic
Kannada moniker, Haalu Hampi (Ruined Hampi). And this is how Hampi was
reduced from being the global centre of awesome wealth and refined culture to merely
becoming a tourist spot.
The Hindus of South India never recovered from this mortal blow.
The glory that was scripted by the Tapas of Maharshi Vidyaranya and ably executed
by the intrepid gallantry of Harihara, Bukka and Kumara Kampana’s exploits
culminated more than two hundred years later in the sweeping desolation of Hampi.
The cataclysm of Hampi is the eternal warning of the deep and fundamental values of
culture and civilisation, of history, of reason, of common sense, and of the stupor
induced by prosperity.
And this is the warning that Hampi will tell every “tourist” who will pause and listen
to that cautionary voice behind this desolation.