Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

SWOT Analysis

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/352842224

SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A Geo-spatial Analysis Evidence


from Rural Bangladesh

Article · May 2021

CITATIONS READS

0 1,152

5 authors, including:

Nur Mohammad Munia Tahsin


Jahangirnagar University Jahangirnagar University
7 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS    5 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Md. Rakibul Hasan Nihei Takaaki


Jahangirnagar University Tokyo Metropolitan University
4 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS    35 PUBLICATIONS   123 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Climate Change View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Nur Mohammad on 30 June 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
Printed in May 2021, ISSN 1682-422 Jahangirnagar University

SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A Geo-spatial Analysis


Evidence from Rural Bangladesh
Tanjinul Hoque Mollah*
Nur Mohammad**
Munia Tahsin**
Md. Rakibul Hasan**
Takaaki Nihei***
Abstract: The SWOT analysis is an operational tool for detail understanding of NGOs
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threatsin the rural areas of Bangladesh in terms of
savers, borrowers, saving money and total loan outstanding. However, this study used 30
NGOs with 175 branches for SWOT analysis along the Jamuna River. BRAC, Grameen Bank,
RDRS Bangladesh and ASA etc. are a few noteworthy micro-credit organizations, who are
engaging specifically focusing on the poverty alleviation, empowerment and betterment of
living standards of the rural poor. This study is conducted through questionnaire survey,
involving 383 respondents using 95% confidence level with margin of error 5%,and
Geographical Information System (GIS) to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities
and threats of each NGOs. Hereafter, it evaluated the NGOs concentration along with potential
areas in need of such programs. Finally, this paper suggested that the SWOT of the NGOs area
not similar. It indicates that the number of savers, borrowers, saving money, and total loan
outstanding are depending on geographical location, commercial centers, communication and
transportation facilities, and the size of the population in the study site.
Keywords: SWOT, Micro-credit, Poverty, Rural area, Bangladesh

1. Introduction
Non-governmental Organization (NGO) activities started in Bangladesh after the war of
liberation in 1971 for the purpose of relief and rehabilitation (Hashemi, 1999). It is
lawfully founded corporations generated by legal people for the betterment of the rural
poor people that functions independently from any procedure of government in
Bangladesh (Kamal, 1997). In the top thirteen underprivileged countries, NGOs have
been an extensively debated topic right now, although the number of people without
food, clothing, education and basic health care has been saved by NGOs. (Chowdhury et
al., 2004). It is expected that approximately 13,000 NGOs are engaged in micro-credit
operations, whereas nearly about 80% of the villages in Bangladesh are now sheltered
under NGOs activities (Develtere and Huybrechts, 2002). The maximum number of
NGOs are small and there are a few numbers of large NGOs specially Grameen Bank,
RDRS Bangladesh, BRAC and ASA. Self-employment, agricultural training, health,
sanitation, vocational training, economic empowerment, education both formal and non-
formal, livelihood rehabilitation, women's rights, infrastructure development, disaster

*
Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Environment, Jahangirnagar University,
Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh, thmollah@juniv.edu
**
Research Student, Department of Geography and Environment, Jahangirnagar University,
Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh
***
Associate Professor, Department of Regional Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita 10, Nishi 7,
Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
180 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

management, income-generating activities like a business using NGOs credit, rural


plantation and other poverty reduction program are the key sectors in which NGOs have
made numerous contributions to support remoter of Bangladesh (Hashemi, 1999).
In Bangladesh various formal financial institutions specialized government organizations
and non-government financial institutions perform Microcredit programs (MCP)
(Mahmud, 1996; Siddiqi, 1985). The majority of the institutions are working on
improving the economic situation by building their business of the members (Rahman
and Ahmed, 2001). In 2002 around the world, 67.6 million families have been reached
with microcredit, whereas in Asia there are 59.6 million clients and Bangladesh covered
a number of 13 million (22.6%) clients (Microcredit Summit Campaign Report, 2003).
Women are the main focus of the microcredit programs in Bangladesh. NGOs are
working to make empowerment of the women in the rural society (Milli, 1995; Rahman
et al., 2002). Now they can take a decision on child marriage, buying and selling of
properties, family planning and sending daughters to school (Khanam, 2007).
Furthermore, in collaboration with savings facilities, non-productive loan facilities,
insurance facilities, business growth such as production-oriented and management
training as well as marketing support, welfare-related programs such as educational
facilities, health facilities, human rights and eventually social consciousness training,
NGOs have provided credits (Siddiqui et al., 2002; Roodman and Morduch, 2009;
Rogaly, 1996).
In Bangladesh, the ongoing and vital issues are socio-economic development and
poverty alleviation through the NGOs’ provision in the rural parts of Bangladesh,
whereas for poverty alleviation, the micro-credit is thought as one of the important tools
along with community and individual development. The NGOs have been working in
various sectors like education sectors, providing health and sanitation facilities,
agricultural loan and tools, training on environment management, child protection,
vocational training, economic empowerment both men and women, livelihood
rehabilitation, human rights, NGOs credits combined with savings facilities, enterprise
development like production oriented training and management training, marketing
support, reduce child marriage, infrastructure development, disaster management, etc.
However, the main aim of the study is to know the SWOT of local NGOs in the field of
poverty reduction through micro-credit services to the rural poor along the Jamuna River,
Bangladesh. To fulfill the aim, specific objectives are being set for this study includes;
(1) evaluate the involvement of rural poor to micro credit program; and finally, (2)
SWOT analysis for local NGOs using number of borrowers and total outstanding’s along
the river side of Jamuna, Bangladesh.

2. Relevant literature review


Astatistics of the socio-economic situation of the local poor is provided by Haider
(2013)who were engaged in the NGOs microcredit program in his paper titled on the
impacts of NGOs on the socio-economic situation of the poor: a case study in Rajshahi
city, Bangladesh which was published in the international journal of community
development. He used Rajshahi city as a case study. He describes that NGOs are
commonly familiar with their unique ability to reach the grassroots poor people and
bring sustainable improvement of the lives of the rural poor. The focus of this study had
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 181

been on the socio-economic condition of poor people in rural areas formed through local
NGO programs. In the journal of information and knowledge management, Hasnain
described the knowledge and socio-economic development of the rural poor in 2013.
This paper is on the contribution of local NGOs to socio-economic development in
Bangladesh. This paper revealed that in Bangladesh about 22,000 NGOs are in
operations with a view to developing the living standard of their lifestyle. The NGO
facility recipients are the main stakeholders who are involved in receiving the knowledge
transferred by the NGOs. In recent years NGOs have put more attention and efforts on
income generation that having an involvement with micro-credit program, employment
generation in different sectors, giving formal and informal education of rural children
and adults, health, nutrition, family planning, establishment of financial services at the
grassroots level, environment, water supply and sanitation, women’s rights, poultry and
livestock, human rights and legal aid.
Microcredit is known as a way of reducing poverty operationally. There are, however,
critical debates on the feasibility of the microcredit scheme and the profiles of
beneficiaries benefiting from the credit program of local NGOs (Chowdhury et al. 2004).
The recent literature has established that microfinance has various impacts on the
livelihoods of rural poor people. Microcredit has taken millions of poor people out of
poverty and stimulated economic sustainability, particularly women, who are likely to be
able to increase their household income, minimize economic insecurity and, in some
situations, eradicate poverty altogether (Glazer, 2010; Bansal, 2011).In addition, with the
help of microfinance activities, they have experienced improved healthcare, health
services, and greater empowerment (Bauer et al. 2008; Swope, 2005).Their arguments
are supported by Yunus, 2004 in his paper titled on expanding microcredit outreach to
reach the millennium development goals: some issues for attention in the journal of
attacking poverty with microcredit. He said microcredit has a lot of positive effects on
families earning credit from local NGOs. Murdock and Haley (2002) have performed a
widespread study of the effects of microfinance on poverty reduction, and the loan
scheme has a sufficient positive impact on rural villagers' poverty reduction as well as
millennium development goals. These interpretations were approved by the results of an
evaluation study commissioned by the Asian Development Bank (ADB, 2007) on the
effect of microcredit programs on rural families and the position of women of
Bangladesh, Philippines, and Uzbekistan.
The study showed that the microfinance program had a positive effect on the status of
rural poor people through higher volumes of household currency, a formal and non-
formal food education program, greater involvement in big purchasing decisions and
investments, the potential to gain more money by the use of credit by NGOs, a higher
position in business decision-making, gaining new expertise and developing their
network of friends and help networks, and gaining more money. In addition, countries
such as Bangladesh, Nepal, India, Vietnam, China and the Philippines have appointed for
avaluation of MFIs (Microfinance Institutions).These assessments examined the benefits
of the NGO micro-credit scheme, such as improved food and nutrition protection,
housing and wellbeing, school enrollment for children and adults, higher levels of
literacy, food for school-going children, empowerment and mobility for women, focus
on higher average household income, building human resources and assets and
community engagement, self-employmentand employment of family members (Bedson,
2009).
182 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

Panjaitan-Drioadisuryo et al. (1999) had conducted a research titled on Gender, self-


employment and microcredit programs and published it in the journal of the Quarterly
Review of Economics and Finance. They found that 90% of Bank Rakyat Indonesia
(BRI) participants in the study raised their income by entering the credit program of
NGOs and these families crossed the poverty line by developing various sources of
income. Income of only 10 % participants did not increased because of mishandling the
credit by their husbands. Furthermore, Hossain in 2008 had analyzed the community
development and livelihood security and in their analysis, this paper presented at the
Tokyo Peace Builders' Symposium, 2008 and Ghalib et al. (2011) undertook to analyze
whether microcredit minimized poverty and to what degree and to what extent poverty
mitigated.. Their study confirmed that microfinance programs improved deliberately in
education, agricultural system, household income, improved the facilities on health care,
clothing, water supply and sanitation as well as building a quality of dwelling house.
Hossain (2012) studied measuring the impact of BRAC microfinance operations, which
had published in the journal of International Business Research. He sought to measure
the effect of BRAC's microfinance operations on the livelihoods of rural village
borrowers. Since joining the loan scheme of NGOs, the revenue of the Borrower's and
their contribution to family spending grew dramatically. Besides that, he also found that
the volume of monthly savings was not significant, but the approach of the borrowers
towards savings was noticeable. Besides that, Reddy had revealed that microfinance
makes the socio-economic conditions better for the rural poor people in 2000. He found
that “the credit program of MFIs is highly successful, which is evidenced by the high
repayment rate, awareness generated among the target group and beneficial
developmental impact created on the receivers of the credit”. However, there are some
critics disagreeing because poverty cannot be removed with a small amount of money
provided by NGOs. The answer of criticism had found in a statement given by Adam
Smith, 2010 and Ahmed, 2004 in their research. They said “when you have got a little, it
is often easy to get more. The great difficulty is to get that little”. The economic
condition of the needy poor people in the rural areas is so terrible that they do not have
enough opportunities to get little amounts. In addition, this tiny sum is the need for the
vulnerable to support them in revenue producing operations at the right time. (Ahmed,
2004; Ahsan, 2005).

3. Methodology
3.1 Study area
There are 126 unions in the research area in 5 districts along the river side of Jamuna and
30 NGOs working on the study site with 175 sub-branches. Sirajganj, Bogura, Jamalpur,
Gaibandha and the district of Kurigram are part of the study area. The study area covers
the Old Brahmaputra, Jamuna (Young Brahmaputra) floodplain and Ganges River
floodplain which are highly productive for agricultural activities. Floodplains can
facilitate access to fresh water, the fertility of agricultural floodplain land, cheap
transportation and the ease of flat land expansion.
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 183

Figure 1: Study area along the river bank of Jamuna, Bangladesh


Source: Made by the authors, 2020

Numerous non-governmental organizations active in almost every field were located in


the study area. The purpose and scope of their work differ, along with the type of project
they receive funds for. NGOs such as ASA, BRAC, Grameen Bank, RDRS Bangladesh
are NGOs at the national level and operate exclusively throughout the region (Mollah,
184 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

T.H. et al., 2019). In household surveys and Focused Group Discussions (FGD), as well
as in current government studies, a full list of all NGOs currently operating in our
research area is listed below in Table 1.
Table 1: List of NGOs in the study area
No Branch Name Frequency No Branch Name Frequency
1 AKOTA 2 16 PRODIPON 1
2 ARBAN 1 17 PROGRESS 1
3 ARCHES 3 18 RDRS Bangladesh 22
4 ASA 35 19 RSDA 1
Atto Mohila
5 1 20 Sajida Foundation 1
Unnaion Somity
Bhomukhi Mohila
6 1 21 SAP 1
Unnaion Somity
7 BRAC 31 22 SATU 1
8 DORP 1 23 SKS 7
9 GKS 1 24 SSS 6
Thangara Mara Mohila
10 Grameen Bank 31 25 1
Sabuj Songo
TMSS (Thakurgan
11 GUK 9 26 4
Mohila Sobuj Sango)
12 MMS 2 27 UDDIPAN 1
13 NDP 3 28 Uddog 1
14 PDBF 1 29 UDPS 2
15 Porosh 1 30 US 2
Total 175
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020

3.2 Data sources and methods


There were relevant maps both hard copy and soft copy of the study sites, information’s
on micro-credit sectors and data published by the local or national authorities in
Bangladesh were collected and photocopied. For instance, the researchers intended to
conduct a detailed survey on 126 unions of 5 districts during the field work. The union
maps were available in the DLRS (Directorate of Land Records and Surveying) of
Bangladesh. These maps were purchased at that time. The data and information were
collected using questionnaires and interviewing of the selected focus group (e.g. elderly
local people, local community, members of the union parishad, employers and manager
of each NGOs, borrowers and savers of the NGOs), observation and other related
methods. A standard land use map and current crop calendar were prepared of the areas
with the help of local people’s perceptions.
There were 383 questionnaires survey (95% confidence level and 5% margin of error)
conducted randomly and 10 focus group discussions at different levels. Therefore, this
paper makes one common questionnaire sheet, which includes all information’s of
micro-credit sectors. The research interviewed certain groups who participated
a. Local community and individuals (total 383 questionnaire statistically and 10
FGDs- each group consists 7-8 persons where 5/6 are males and 3/2 are female,
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 185

and information gathered includes; strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and


threats of the local NGOs, monthly income of them before and after joining to
local NGOs credit program, distance from the NGOs to the respondents and
facilities had provided by local NGOs).
b. Employees of local NGOs who invest in the credit facilities of 126 unions (focused
group discussions and interviews with 175 branches of 30 NGOs and provided
services to rural poor people).
This study also analyzed the correlation among savers, borrowers, saving deposits and
total loan outstanding. Furthermore, the causes of strength and weakness of each NGOs
were explained by geographical factors as the responsible indicator for the change of up
and downward economic condition.

4. Major findings of SWOT analysis for local NGOs


4.1 Evaluate the involvement of rural poor to micro credit program
Four noteworthy NGOs are working along the river bank of Jamuna like Bangladesh
Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC), Association for Social Advancement (ASA),
Grameen Bankand RDRS Bangladesh (Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Service). Each branch of
local NGOs run by six people: a branch manager, an assistant branch manager, and four
loan officers. The branch manager is specified with the right to accept all transactions
within the branch. Each branch is a profit center and is estimated to fully recoverable
costs between 9 and 12 months. There were total three NGOs information’s like a
number of savers, borrowers, total savings and total outstanding missing because the
branch manager had no information on it and only local NGOs had no borrowers and
outstanding information. In the association for social advancement (ASA), there are
57,085 savers and 56,531 borrowers involve with NGOs credit program and the total
saving deposits and total out standing’s were 30,561,697 BDT and
353,805,656 BDT accordingly (1 USD = 78.7353 BDT). It means that the digits of
savers and borrowers are almost equal and the total outstanding is bigger than the total
saving deposits. Therefore, rural poor people had got more loans and in various income-
generating activities such as business, agricultural sectors, kitchen gardening and poultry
farming, they capitalized money and improved their economic situation and standard of
living. On the other hand, Grameen Bank is facilitating the rural poor with the loan to
alleviate the poverty of individual or group of rural poor people. There are 96,516 savers
and 84,5931 borrowers involve with Grameen Banks credit program and the total saving
deposits and total outstanding’s were 269,509,755 BDT and 484,849,111 BDT
accordingly (1 USD = 78.7353 BDT). However, BRAC encourages rural poor people to
involve in microcredit programs. There are 103,647 savers and 89,050 borrowers involve
with BRACs credit program and the total saving deposits and total outstanding’s were
104,759,268 BDT and 284,864,091 BDT accordingly (1 USD = 78.7353 BDT).
186 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

Figure 2: Total number of savers and borrowers along the river side of Jamuna, Bangladesh, 2020
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020

It means that the number of savers and borrowers are almost equal and the total
outstanding is bigger than the total saving deposit that is same as Grameen Bank. BRAC
is investing more money in the socio-economic improvement of the rural poor people
along the riverside of Jamuna, Bangladesh. Therefore, rural poor people had got more
opportunities to capitalize money in various income yielding activities like the business
and other purposes as well as improved their economic condition and standard of living.
RDRS Bangladesh (Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Service) is working for poverty reduction
and empowerment with rural poor’s economic development by the NGOs credit program
in northern areas of Bangladesh. There are 46,130 savers and 37,115 borrowers involve
with RDRS Bangladesh credit program and the total saving deposits and total
outstanding’s were 53,851,944 BDT and 109,182,834 BDT accordingly (1 USD =
78.7353 BDT).
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 187

Figure 3: Total savings and outstanding of all NGOs along the river side of Jamuna, Bangladesh, 2020
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020

It indicates that the number of savers and borrowers are almost equal whereas the total
outstanding is bigger than the total saving deposit, which is same as Grameen Bank,
ASA, and BRAC. RDRS Bangladesh is also investing more money in the socio-
economic growth of rural poor people, especially in the northern regions of Bangladesh.

4.2 SWOT analysis for local NGOs using number of borrowers and total
outstanding’s
This section shows the member coverage using bubble maps. The MFIs are classified
here into 3 categories (i.e. 3 sizes of Bubbles) based on their total outstanding loans. The
large bubble illustrates the value of outstanding loans more than 10 million taka while
middle and small MFIs represent groups between 5-10 and less than TK 5 million
respectively. Therefore, each bubble also indicates the strength or weakness of the
respective MFIs in terms of borrowed money.
ASA (Association for Social Advancement) is one of the prominent NGO in Bangladesh.
Among the 30 NGOs, ASA is working for social and economic development by
providing credit facilities amid rural poor. For detail understanding of ASA’s strength in
terms of loan outstanding and the number of borrowers in the study sites; the loan
outstanding is categorized into three classes such as less than TK 5 million / MFI,
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is more than Tk 10 million. Besides
that, the total number of borrowers is also sorted into three major groups like (400 to
1,281), (1,282 to 1,789) and last is (1,790 to 2,379). Among 126 unions, a total number
of savers, borrowers, savings deposits and loan outstanding are 57,085, 56,531,
30,561,697 and 353,805,656 respectively. There are 35 branches of ASA are working
188 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

along the river Jamuna. Association for Social Advancement (ASA) is covering 15.07%
savers and 17.53% borrowers respectively among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. The
capacity of ASA along the Jamuna River is not same in terms of providing loans and
their number borrowers. The distribution pattern of loan outstanding is different from
district to district. ASA predominantly provides a loan in the district of Kurigram than
the other districts of the study sites. The loan distribution pattern of ASA is some sort of
uneven in Kurigram district. The loan outstanding of the three branches is more than Tk
10 million, whereas the number of borrowers is only 1,282 to 1,789. Besides that, in the
northern part of Kurigram, the number of borrowers is higher, but the loan amount is
lower that shows inequality in loan distribution. It indicates that once the less number of
borrowers takes a high amount of loan from NGOs, they might drive for bigger
investment in business sectors where economic opportunities are higher than other study
sites. In the middle part of Jamuna River, the number of the borrower is 400 to 1,281
where the loan outstanding is less than Tk 5 Million / MFI. This might happen because,
in the middle part of Jamuna, population density is lower than upper and lower part of
Jamuna River. As a result, the number of NGOs and NGOs activities in credit sectors
also lower. Furthermore, in the lower part of Sirajganj district, the amount of the loan
(more than Tk 10 million) and the number of borrowers (1,790 to 2,379) is higher. It also
shows that the numbers of borrowers are strongly linked with the loan outstanding in the
study sites. In Gaibandha and Jamalpur district, there is some branches borrower number
is higher (1,790 to 2,379), but the loan amount is lower (between TK 5 and 10 million
per MFI) in comparison to the other branches of ASA. Finally, it can be said that higher
number of borrower and outstanding indicates a very high frequency of
growth/commercial centers are situated in the sites where the rate of money transaction is
higher. There is also a risk of returning the allocated loan to the borrowers as the amount
loan per borrowers is very high in comparison to other NGOs (Figure 4a).

Figure 4 (a-d): Comparison between total outstanding and borrowers (ASA, BRAC, Grameen
Bank and RDRS Bangladesh) along the river bank of Jamuna, Bangladesh
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
Livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020

Figure 4b demonstrates the BRACs (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee)


capacity in terms of loan outstanding and the number of borrowers in the study sites. The
BRAC (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee) is one of the prominent and the
famous NGO in Bangladesh that made an enormous contribution to the social and
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 189

economic development by providing credit facilities amid rural poor. The loan
outstanding is categorized into three classes such as less than TK 5 million / MFI,
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is more than Tk 10 million. Besides
that, the total number of borrowers is also sorted into three major groups like (845 to
1,900), (1,901 to 3,229) and last is (3,230 to 7,194). There are 31 branches of BRAC are
working along the river Jamuna. BRAC is covering 27.38% savers and 27.61%
borrowers respectively, among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. It indicates that along the
river Jamuna, BRAC reaches to the higher number of rural poor who are willing to join
in the BRACs credit program. BRACs credit service from the upper to lower stream is
almost equal, except for the district of Kurigram. In Kurigram there are a large number
of branches of BRAC, which provides a loan to the rural people for their economic
purposes. There are only three branches that have a higher loan outstanding (more than
Tk 10 million) along with the higher number of borrowers (3.230 to 7,194). On the other
hand, in between Gaibandha and Kurigram district, there are some branches where
higher concentrations of borrowers (3,230 to 7,194) are located but the loan outstanding
is comparatively poor (less than TK 5 million / MFI). Besides that, in the middle of
Kurigram district where the loan outstanding is higher, but the number of borrowers is
less (1,901 to 3,229). It indicates that, in Kurigram district, there is no proper relation to
loan outstanding and borrowers. In the middle stream of Jamuna, where part of
Gaibandha, Bogura, and Jamalpur districts are located, the number of BRAC branches is
very limited. This might be because here population density is a bit lower with a lack of
transportation and communication facilities. The scenario changes drastically when it
comes to Sirajganj district where the number of borrowers and the loan outstanding are
higher. In some cases, the number of borrowers is medium (1,901 to 3,229) but the loan
amount is higher. There are some areas (middle part of Sirajganj district) that have a
minimum number of the borrower, but the outstanding level belongs in between Tk 5 and
10 million / MFI. The number of branches for BRAC is some sort of satisfactory, but
their spatial distributions are not equal. Finally, it indicates that in Kurigram and
Sirajganj district where the numbers of growth centers are higher, the concentration of
NGOs’ is higher in term of their loan distribution. This step will help to establish new
branches of NGOs in the unserved areas to serve rural poor people who are suffering
from poverty and daily basic needs.
Figure 4c illustrates that the Grameen Banks capacity also in terms of the loan
outstanding and the number of borrowers in the study sites. The loan outstanding of
Grameen Bank is categorized into three classes such as less than TK 5 million / MFI,
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is more than Tk 10 million. Besides
that, the total number of borrowers is also sorted into three major groups like (240 to
1,282), (1,283 to 3,450) and last is (3,451 to 5,509). There are 31 branches of Grameen
Bank are working along the river Jamuna. It covers 25.49% savers and 26.24%
borrowers respectively, among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. In the upper, middle and
lower part of Jamuna River, the number of branches (Grameen Bank) is 15, 6 and 10
respectively. It indicates that in the middle part of Jamuna, Grameen Banks
concentration is less than upper and lower parts. However, in the upper part, the
concentration of Grameen Banks is higher where they disburse loans among borrowers
(1,283 to 3,450) is more than Tk 10 million within 9 branches. Other rest of 6 branches,
the amount of the loan outstanding is between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the
borrowers are varied 1,283 to 3,450 in the study sites. This is because a higher number of
population and commercial centers are situated in the upper part of Jamuna River
especially in the Kurigram district. On the other hand, in the part of the Jamuna, the
190 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

number of branches of GB is lower (6 branches in total) but in the 5 branches, the loan
outstanding is more than Tk 10 million where the number of borrowers is also higher
(3,451 to 5,509). There is only one branch loan outstanding and borrowers are between
TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and 1,283 to 3,450 distinctly. Furthermore, in the lower part
of Jamuna (upper and lower part of Sirajganj district), the services of GB seem to be very
operational and effective as well. Among the 10 branches of GB in the upper and lower
part of Sirajganj district, all branches have better strength in terms of their borrower
(3,451 to 5,509) number and total loan outstanding (more than Tk 10 million).
Figure 4d shows that the RDRSs capacity also in terms of its loan outstanding and the
total number of borrowers in the study sites. The loan outstanding of RDRS is
categorized into three major classes such as (1) less than TK 5 million / MFI, (2)
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is (3) more than Tk 10 million /
MFI. Besides that, the total number of borrowers is also categorized into three major
classes like (490 to 1,185), (1,186 to 2,006) and last is (2,007 to 2,850). There are 22
branches of RDRS are working along the river Jamuna. It covers 12.18% savers and
11.51% borrowers respectively, among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. In the lower
portion of Kurigram district, the number of borrowers is higher ranging in between 2,007
to 2,850 per MFI. In several branches of RDRS in Kurigram district, the loan outstanding
is not very high in comparison to other NGOs as it has been mentioned earlier. The loan
outstanding in several branches is lower (less than TK 5 million / MFI) than the number
of borrowers (2,007 to 2,850). In terms of outstanding, there is only one branch that was
located in the southern part of Kurigram where loan outstanding is higher (more than Tk
10 million / MFI), but the borrower's number is medium (1,186 to 2,006). It indicates
that once a huge amount of loan taken by the borrower for bigger investment is a sign of
great progress for the economic development of individuals. But at the same time, it is
also considered a higher risk for both the NGO and the borrower, if there have a chance
to fails to return the loan.
Apart from the four major NGOs, there are 26 NGOs along with 56 branches were
located who are working for the economic improvement of the poor by providing credit
services to the poor in the study sites. They cover 19.86% savers and 17.10% borrowers
in the study sites respectively. It indicates that the major four NGOs (Grameen Bank,
ASA, BRAC and RDRS Bangladesh) are covering 80.14% of the savers and 82.90% of
the borrowers in the study sites. In Kurigram, there are five NGOs that have a borrower
in between 859 to 2,258, whereas the concentration of NGOs is lower, apart from major
four NGOs. It has been also noticed that very limited number of branches are working in
the middle stream of the Jamuna. In the lower part of Sirajganj district, there are very
few numbers of NGOs are working with the lower number of borrowers and loan
outstanding.

4.3 Correlation analysis and the geographical factors of SWOT analysis


This paper presents a correlation analysis among savers, borrowers, savings deposits,
total loan outstanding (dependent variables) and the remoter’s annual income
(independent variables) to show the relationship between the variables. The analysis of
the correlation shows that the coefficient correlation for savers (r) is equal to 0.731,
indicating a significant relationship between savers and their income (r = 0.731, p <
0.001).This may be because higher-income persons tend to save money with high
interest for the future crisis mainly for the disaster mitigation period. Besides that,
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 191

geographical location is also another reason for saving money and to improve their social
status among the rural community. The correlation coefficient is for borrowers (r)equals
to 0.534 (r = 0.534, p < 0.001) indicating a cabalistic relationship between borrowers and
increase of income. Along the Jamuna, savers are mainly borrowers. As a result of
joining the credit program of NGOs, they borrowed money for the business purpose
where geographical location of the commercial/ growth centers are contributing a lot to
encourage local people to borrow money from the local NGOs. On the contrary, the
correlation coefficient is for saving deposits and total loan outstanding(r) equals to 0.119
and 0.182 accordingly. This results indicate that the relationship between saving deposits
and total loan outstanding with remoter annual income is slightly significant. Finally, the
overall result reveals that geographical location, demographic characteristics of the local
people, spatial distribution of local NGOs and establishment of commercial/ growth
centers are playing acabalistic role to make a better lifestyle of the remoter.

Figure 5: Geographical and anthropogenic factors for the distribution of local NGOs and their
strength and weakness in terms of savers, borrowers, saving deposits and total loan
outstanding’salong the river bank of Jamuna, Bangladesh.
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
Livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020
192 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

5. Conclusion
The discussions lead us to a conclusion that amount of NGOs is not sufficient to serve a
large number of populations in the study sites. In the study sites, it takes proper
management along with equal distribution of local NGOs according to the population
density. Besides that, a total number of borrowers and loan outstanding illustrate the
strength and weakness of the NGOs capacity. Apart from major four NGOs, rest of 26
NGOs of 56 branches need to increase their capacity by involving more savers and
borrowers in the study sites. A number of growth centers are also a backdrop for the
development of the rural economy in the study sites. NGOs are providing more loans to
borrowers habituated close to the near growth centers. But the people habituated far
away from the growth centers are missing from the services of NGOs. If these
organizations establish new growth/commercial centers by providing loans to the poor
people in the remote areas, then the integrated development will have resulted.

References
Adam, A. M., 2010: Financial Openness Induced Growth and Poverty Reduction. The
International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 5: 75-86. Available at:
DOI: 10.3923/ijaef.2011.75.86
Ahmed, S., 2004: Microcredit and Poverty: New Realities and Strategic Issues. In S. Ahmed and
M. A. Hakim (Eds.), Attacking Poverty with Microcredit (2nd ed.) (pp. 23). Dhala-1000,
Bangladesh: The University Press Limited. Available at: http://www.ijset.net/
journal/1706.pdf
Ahsan, A. H. M. K. 2005. Role of NGOs Health, Family Planning and Education Program in
Poverty Reduction in Bangladesh: A Study on BRAC. Pakistan Journalof Social Science,
3(8), 1075-1081. Available at: https://www.medwelljournals.com/abstract/?
doi=pjssci.2005.1075.1081
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2007. Effect of Microfinance Operations on Poor Rural
Households and the Status of Women. Special Evaluation Study. Reference Number: SST:
REG 2007-19. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/15/39503711.pdf
Bansal, D. 2011. Impact of Microfinance on Poverty, Employment and Women Empowerment in
Rural Punjab. (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Economics, Punjabi University,
Patiala, India. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/3031
Bauer, A., Hasan, R., Magsombol, R. and Wan, G. 2008. The World Bank New Poverty Data:
Implications for the Asian Development Bank. SustainableDevelopment Working Paper
Series No. 2. Asian Development Bank. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/
Presntations/New-Poverty-Estimates/Poverty-Data-Implications.pdf
BBS, 2011: Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics
Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh,
Dhaka. Available at: http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/
Image/SubjectMatterDataIndex/YB-2012.pdf
Bedson, J. 2009. Microfinance in Asia-Trends, Challenges and Opportunities (1st ed.).
Queensland, Australia. The Foundation for Development Cooperation. Available at:
http://arcfinance.org/pdfs/pubs/MF_Trends_Challenges_Opportunities.pdf
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 193

BRAC (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee), 1990a: Half yearly report, June 1990,
Dhaka Bangladesh.
Chowdhury, A. F. and Rose, P. 2004. Non-state Provision of Basic Services. Education in
Bangladesh. Mimeo, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Develtere, P., and Huybrechts, A. 2002. Evidence on the Social and Economic Impact of
Grameen Bank and BRAC on the Poor in Bangladesh. Higher Institute ofLabour Studies.
Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Available at: http://www.hiva.be/docs/
paper/p2.pdf
Ghalib, A. K., Malki, I. and Imai, K. S. 2011. The Impact of Microfinance and Its Role in Easing
of Poverty of Rural Households: Estimations from Pakistan. Discussion Paper Series.
Kobe University, Japan. Available at: http://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/
English/DP2011-28.pdf
Glazer, S. 2010. Evaluating Microfinance: Do Small Loans for Poor Entrepreneurs End Poverty?
Global Researcher, 4(4), 81-101. Available at: http://www.interesjournals.org/full-
articles/impact-of-micro-credit-on-thelivelihood-of-borrowers-evidence-from-mekelle-
city-ethiopia.pdf?view=inline
Haider, S. K. U. 2013. The Impacts of NGOs on the Socio-Economic Situation of the Poor: A
Case Study in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. International Journal of Community
Development, 1(1), 35–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11634/233028791301360
Hashemi, S. M., and S. R. Schuler, 1993: Declining and Studying Empowerment: A research
note from Bangladesh, JSI Working Paper No. 3 (Arlington, VA: John Snow Research
and Training Institute, 1993).
Hashemi, S. M., and S. R. Schuler, et al. 1996, Rural Credit Programs and Women's
Empowerment in Bangladesh, World Development 24(4): 635-653. Available at:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/13314_hashemi_etal.pdf
Hasnain, S. S. 2013. The NGOs Knowledge and Socio-economic Development: An Empirical
Investigation in Bangladesh, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. Vol.3,
No.4, 2013 ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online). Available at:
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IKM/article/view/5169
Hossain, M. 2008. Community Development and Livelihood Security: BRAC’s Experience in
Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The Paper Presented to The Tokyo Peace builders’
Symposium 2008, UN House, Tokyo, March 24-25. Available at:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/pko/symposium0803/hossain.pdf.Google
Hossain, M. K. 2012. Measuring the Impact of BRAC Microfinance Operations: A Case Study of
a Village. The Journal of International Business Research. Vol. 5, No. 4; April 2012.
Available at: doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n4p112 and URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n4p112
Kamal, M. 1997. Poverty Measurement Methodology and Poverty Propensity in Bangladesh.
Daridro Parimap Padhati O Bangladeshe Daridror Probonota, BIDS, Dhaka, 1997,
Page-85 to 86.
Khanam, F. 2007. Women Participation in Rural Advancement in Bangladesh: Nature of Poverty
Alleviation and Women Empowerment. M.Sc. Ag. Econ. Thesis, Department of
Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
Mahmud, W. 1996. Employment Patterns and Income Formation in Rural Bangladesh: The Role
of Rural Non-farm Sector. The Bangladesh DevelopmentStudies. Volume, 24: 1-28,
Bangladesh.
194 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019

Microcredit Summit Campaign. 2003. State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2003,
Washington D.C.
Milli, S.N. 1995. Achievement of BRAC on Gender Issues in Agriculture’ Proceedings of a
National Workshop, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka.
Mollah, T.H., Shishir, S., Ullah, W. et al. Assessing NGOs micro-credit programs: a geo-spatial
and socio-economic scenario from rural Bangladesh. Int Rev Econ 66, 79–99 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-018-0315-x
Murdoch, J. and Haley, B. 2002. Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction.
NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014. Available at: www.nyu.edu/wagner/publichtml/
cgibin/workingPapers/wp1014.pdf
Panjaitan-Drioadisuryo, R. D. M. and Cloud, K. 1999. Gender, Self-employment and Microcredit
Programs: An Indonesian Case Study. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,
39(5), 769-779. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)00028-9
Rahman, H.M. and Ahmed, F. 2001. Impact of NGOs on the Socioeconomic Development of
Target population in Some Selected Areas of Bangladesh. Research Report, Bangladesh
Agricultural Research Council.
Rahman, M.M., Mostafa, K. and Abdullah, A.M. 2002. Micro-credit: A Sharp Weapon for
Economic Empowerment of Rural Women. Pp.99-105.
Reddy, G. N. 2000. Empowering Women through Microcredit and Income-Generating
Activities. Towards Empowering Women- Microcredit and Social Mobilization. Available
at: http://www.acrn.eu/resources/Journals/201302c.pdf
Rogaly, B. 1996. Micro-Finance Evangelism, Destitute Women and the Hard Selling of a New
Anti-Poverty Formula. Development in Practice. Volume, 6 (2): pp. 100–112.
Roodman, D. and Morduch, J. 2009. The Impact of Micro-Credit on the Poor in Bangladesh:
Revisiting the Evidence. (Working Paper No. 174). Washington DC: Centre for Global
Development.
Siddiqi, N. 1985. Employment of Women and Appropriate Technology with Special Referable to
Bangladesh, ADAB News. Pp.10-15.
Siddiqui, B. N., Asif, F., Iqbal, S., Hassan, M. Z. Y., Malik, N. A. and Najwa, M. S. 2002.
Impact of Loan Facilities Provided by PRSP for Poverty Alleviation in Farming
Communities of Faisalabad. Journal of Applied Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004.
Swope, T. 2005. Microfinance and Poverty Alleviation. (Dissertation Paper). \]
Available at: www.rollins.edu/olin/rurj/mpa.pdf
Yunus, M. 2004. Expanding Microcredit Outreach to Reach the Millennium Development Goals:
Some Issues for Attention. In S. Ahmed & M. A. Hakim (Eds.), Attacking Poverty with
Microcredit (2nd ed.) (pp. 7-22). Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh: The University Press Limited.
Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1146/4763791439366492dd458
dcd6b975edb0544.pdf

View publication stats

You might also like