SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis
net/publication/352842224
CITATIONS READS
0 1,152
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Nur Mohammad on 30 June 2021.
1. Introduction
Non-governmental Organization (NGO) activities started in Bangladesh after the war of
liberation in 1971 for the purpose of relief and rehabilitation (Hashemi, 1999). It is
lawfully founded corporations generated by legal people for the betterment of the rural
poor people that functions independently from any procedure of government in
Bangladesh (Kamal, 1997). In the top thirteen underprivileged countries, NGOs have
been an extensively debated topic right now, although the number of people without
food, clothing, education and basic health care has been saved by NGOs. (Chowdhury et
al., 2004). It is expected that approximately 13,000 NGOs are engaged in micro-credit
operations, whereas nearly about 80% of the villages in Bangladesh are now sheltered
under NGOs activities (Develtere and Huybrechts, 2002). The maximum number of
NGOs are small and there are a few numbers of large NGOs specially Grameen Bank,
RDRS Bangladesh, BRAC and ASA. Self-employment, agricultural training, health,
sanitation, vocational training, economic empowerment, education both formal and non-
formal, livelihood rehabilitation, women's rights, infrastructure development, disaster
*
Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Environment, Jahangirnagar University,
Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh, thmollah@juniv.edu
**
Research Student, Department of Geography and Environment, Jahangirnagar University,
Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh
***
Associate Professor, Department of Regional Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita 10, Nishi 7,
Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
180 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
been on the socio-economic condition of poor people in rural areas formed through local
NGO programs. In the journal of information and knowledge management, Hasnain
described the knowledge and socio-economic development of the rural poor in 2013.
This paper is on the contribution of local NGOs to socio-economic development in
Bangladesh. This paper revealed that in Bangladesh about 22,000 NGOs are in
operations with a view to developing the living standard of their lifestyle. The NGO
facility recipients are the main stakeholders who are involved in receiving the knowledge
transferred by the NGOs. In recent years NGOs have put more attention and efforts on
income generation that having an involvement with micro-credit program, employment
generation in different sectors, giving formal and informal education of rural children
and adults, health, nutrition, family planning, establishment of financial services at the
grassroots level, environment, water supply and sanitation, women’s rights, poultry and
livestock, human rights and legal aid.
Microcredit is known as a way of reducing poverty operationally. There are, however,
critical debates on the feasibility of the microcredit scheme and the profiles of
beneficiaries benefiting from the credit program of local NGOs (Chowdhury et al. 2004).
The recent literature has established that microfinance has various impacts on the
livelihoods of rural poor people. Microcredit has taken millions of poor people out of
poverty and stimulated economic sustainability, particularly women, who are likely to be
able to increase their household income, minimize economic insecurity and, in some
situations, eradicate poverty altogether (Glazer, 2010; Bansal, 2011).In addition, with the
help of microfinance activities, they have experienced improved healthcare, health
services, and greater empowerment (Bauer et al. 2008; Swope, 2005).Their arguments
are supported by Yunus, 2004 in his paper titled on expanding microcredit outreach to
reach the millennium development goals: some issues for attention in the journal of
attacking poverty with microcredit. He said microcredit has a lot of positive effects on
families earning credit from local NGOs. Murdock and Haley (2002) have performed a
widespread study of the effects of microfinance on poverty reduction, and the loan
scheme has a sufficient positive impact on rural villagers' poverty reduction as well as
millennium development goals. These interpretations were approved by the results of an
evaluation study commissioned by the Asian Development Bank (ADB, 2007) on the
effect of microcredit programs on rural families and the position of women of
Bangladesh, Philippines, and Uzbekistan.
The study showed that the microfinance program had a positive effect on the status of
rural poor people through higher volumes of household currency, a formal and non-
formal food education program, greater involvement in big purchasing decisions and
investments, the potential to gain more money by the use of credit by NGOs, a higher
position in business decision-making, gaining new expertise and developing their
network of friends and help networks, and gaining more money. In addition, countries
such as Bangladesh, Nepal, India, Vietnam, China and the Philippines have appointed for
avaluation of MFIs (Microfinance Institutions).These assessments examined the benefits
of the NGO micro-credit scheme, such as improved food and nutrition protection,
housing and wellbeing, school enrollment for children and adults, higher levels of
literacy, food for school-going children, empowerment and mobility for women, focus
on higher average household income, building human resources and assets and
community engagement, self-employmentand employment of family members (Bedson,
2009).
182 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
3. Methodology
3.1 Study area
There are 126 unions in the research area in 5 districts along the river side of Jamuna and
30 NGOs working on the study site with 175 sub-branches. Sirajganj, Bogura, Jamalpur,
Gaibandha and the district of Kurigram are part of the study area. The study area covers
the Old Brahmaputra, Jamuna (Young Brahmaputra) floodplain and Ganges River
floodplain which are highly productive for agricultural activities. Floodplains can
facilitate access to fresh water, the fertility of agricultural floodplain land, cheap
transportation and the ease of flat land expansion.
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 183
T.H. et al., 2019). In household surveys and Focused Group Discussions (FGD), as well
as in current government studies, a full list of all NGOs currently operating in our
research area is listed below in Table 1.
Table 1: List of NGOs in the study area
No Branch Name Frequency No Branch Name Frequency
1 AKOTA 2 16 PRODIPON 1
2 ARBAN 1 17 PROGRESS 1
3 ARCHES 3 18 RDRS Bangladesh 22
4 ASA 35 19 RSDA 1
Atto Mohila
5 1 20 Sajida Foundation 1
Unnaion Somity
Bhomukhi Mohila
6 1 21 SAP 1
Unnaion Somity
7 BRAC 31 22 SATU 1
8 DORP 1 23 SKS 7
9 GKS 1 24 SSS 6
Thangara Mara Mohila
10 Grameen Bank 31 25 1
Sabuj Songo
TMSS (Thakurgan
11 GUK 9 26 4
Mohila Sobuj Sango)
12 MMS 2 27 UDDIPAN 1
13 NDP 3 28 Uddog 1
14 PDBF 1 29 UDPS 2
15 Porosh 1 30 US 2
Total 175
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020
Figure 2: Total number of savers and borrowers along the river side of Jamuna, Bangladesh, 2020
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020
It means that the number of savers and borrowers are almost equal and the total
outstanding is bigger than the total saving deposit that is same as Grameen Bank. BRAC
is investing more money in the socio-economic improvement of the rural poor people
along the riverside of Jamuna, Bangladesh. Therefore, rural poor people had got more
opportunities to capitalize money in various income yielding activities like the business
and other purposes as well as improved their economic condition and standard of living.
RDRS Bangladesh (Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Service) is working for poverty reduction
and empowerment with rural poor’s economic development by the NGOs credit program
in northern areas of Bangladesh. There are 46,130 savers and 37,115 borrowers involve
with RDRS Bangladesh credit program and the total saving deposits and total
outstanding’s were 53,851,944 BDT and 109,182,834 BDT accordingly (1 USD =
78.7353 BDT).
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 187
Figure 3: Total savings and outstanding of all NGOs along the river side of Jamuna, Bangladesh, 2020
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020
It indicates that the number of savers and borrowers are almost equal whereas the total
outstanding is bigger than the total saving deposit, which is same as Grameen Bank,
ASA, and BRAC. RDRS Bangladesh is also investing more money in the socio-
economic growth of rural poor people, especially in the northern regions of Bangladesh.
4.2 SWOT analysis for local NGOs using number of borrowers and total
outstanding’s
This section shows the member coverage using bubble maps. The MFIs are classified
here into 3 categories (i.e. 3 sizes of Bubbles) based on their total outstanding loans. The
large bubble illustrates the value of outstanding loans more than 10 million taka while
middle and small MFIs represent groups between 5-10 and less than TK 5 million
respectively. Therefore, each bubble also indicates the strength or weakness of the
respective MFIs in terms of borrowed money.
ASA (Association for Social Advancement) is one of the prominent NGO in Bangladesh.
Among the 30 NGOs, ASA is working for social and economic development by
providing credit facilities amid rural poor. For detail understanding of ASA’s strength in
terms of loan outstanding and the number of borrowers in the study sites; the loan
outstanding is categorized into three classes such as less than TK 5 million / MFI,
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is more than Tk 10 million. Besides
that, the total number of borrowers is also sorted into three major groups like (400 to
1,281), (1,282 to 1,789) and last is (1,790 to 2,379). Among 126 unions, a total number
of savers, borrowers, savings deposits and loan outstanding are 57,085, 56,531,
30,561,697 and 353,805,656 respectively. There are 35 branches of ASA are working
188 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
along the river Jamuna. Association for Social Advancement (ASA) is covering 15.07%
savers and 17.53% borrowers respectively among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. The
capacity of ASA along the Jamuna River is not same in terms of providing loans and
their number borrowers. The distribution pattern of loan outstanding is different from
district to district. ASA predominantly provides a loan in the district of Kurigram than
the other districts of the study sites. The loan distribution pattern of ASA is some sort of
uneven in Kurigram district. The loan outstanding of the three branches is more than Tk
10 million, whereas the number of borrowers is only 1,282 to 1,789. Besides that, in the
northern part of Kurigram, the number of borrowers is higher, but the loan amount is
lower that shows inequality in loan distribution. It indicates that once the less number of
borrowers takes a high amount of loan from NGOs, they might drive for bigger
investment in business sectors where economic opportunities are higher than other study
sites. In the middle part of Jamuna River, the number of the borrower is 400 to 1,281
where the loan outstanding is less than Tk 5 Million / MFI. This might happen because,
in the middle part of Jamuna, population density is lower than upper and lower part of
Jamuna River. As a result, the number of NGOs and NGOs activities in credit sectors
also lower. Furthermore, in the lower part of Sirajganj district, the amount of the loan
(more than Tk 10 million) and the number of borrowers (1,790 to 2,379) is higher. It also
shows that the numbers of borrowers are strongly linked with the loan outstanding in the
study sites. In Gaibandha and Jamalpur district, there is some branches borrower number
is higher (1,790 to 2,379), but the loan amount is lower (between TK 5 and 10 million
per MFI) in comparison to the other branches of ASA. Finally, it can be said that higher
number of borrower and outstanding indicates a very high frequency of
growth/commercial centers are situated in the sites where the rate of money transaction is
higher. There is also a risk of returning the allocated loan to the borrowers as the amount
loan per borrowers is very high in comparison to other NGOs (Figure 4a).
Figure 4 (a-d): Comparison between total outstanding and borrowers (ASA, BRAC, Grameen
Bank and RDRS Bangladesh) along the river bank of Jamuna, Bangladesh
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
Livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020
economic development by providing credit facilities amid rural poor. The loan
outstanding is categorized into three classes such as less than TK 5 million / MFI,
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is more than Tk 10 million. Besides
that, the total number of borrowers is also sorted into three major groups like (845 to
1,900), (1,901 to 3,229) and last is (3,230 to 7,194). There are 31 branches of BRAC are
working along the river Jamuna. BRAC is covering 27.38% savers and 27.61%
borrowers respectively, among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. It indicates that along the
river Jamuna, BRAC reaches to the higher number of rural poor who are willing to join
in the BRACs credit program. BRACs credit service from the upper to lower stream is
almost equal, except for the district of Kurigram. In Kurigram there are a large number
of branches of BRAC, which provides a loan to the rural people for their economic
purposes. There are only three branches that have a higher loan outstanding (more than
Tk 10 million) along with the higher number of borrowers (3.230 to 7,194). On the other
hand, in between Gaibandha and Kurigram district, there are some branches where
higher concentrations of borrowers (3,230 to 7,194) are located but the loan outstanding
is comparatively poor (less than TK 5 million / MFI). Besides that, in the middle of
Kurigram district where the loan outstanding is higher, but the number of borrowers is
less (1,901 to 3,229). It indicates that, in Kurigram district, there is no proper relation to
loan outstanding and borrowers. In the middle stream of Jamuna, where part of
Gaibandha, Bogura, and Jamalpur districts are located, the number of BRAC branches is
very limited. This might be because here population density is a bit lower with a lack of
transportation and communication facilities. The scenario changes drastically when it
comes to Sirajganj district where the number of borrowers and the loan outstanding are
higher. In some cases, the number of borrowers is medium (1,901 to 3,229) but the loan
amount is higher. There are some areas (middle part of Sirajganj district) that have a
minimum number of the borrower, but the outstanding level belongs in between Tk 5 and
10 million / MFI. The number of branches for BRAC is some sort of satisfactory, but
their spatial distributions are not equal. Finally, it indicates that in Kurigram and
Sirajganj district where the numbers of growth centers are higher, the concentration of
NGOs’ is higher in term of their loan distribution. This step will help to establish new
branches of NGOs in the unserved areas to serve rural poor people who are suffering
from poverty and daily basic needs.
Figure 4c illustrates that the Grameen Banks capacity also in terms of the loan
outstanding and the number of borrowers in the study sites. The loan outstanding of
Grameen Bank is categorized into three classes such as less than TK 5 million / MFI,
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is more than Tk 10 million. Besides
that, the total number of borrowers is also sorted into three major groups like (240 to
1,282), (1,283 to 3,450) and last is (3,451 to 5,509). There are 31 branches of Grameen
Bank are working along the river Jamuna. It covers 25.49% savers and 26.24%
borrowers respectively, among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. In the upper, middle and
lower part of Jamuna River, the number of branches (Grameen Bank) is 15, 6 and 10
respectively. It indicates that in the middle part of Jamuna, Grameen Banks
concentration is less than upper and lower parts. However, in the upper part, the
concentration of Grameen Banks is higher where they disburse loans among borrowers
(1,283 to 3,450) is more than Tk 10 million within 9 branches. Other rest of 6 branches,
the amount of the loan outstanding is between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the
borrowers are varied 1,283 to 3,450 in the study sites. This is because a higher number of
population and commercial centers are situated in the upper part of Jamuna River
especially in the Kurigram district. On the other hand, in the part of the Jamuna, the
190 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
number of branches of GB is lower (6 branches in total) but in the 5 branches, the loan
outstanding is more than Tk 10 million where the number of borrowers is also higher
(3,451 to 5,509). There is only one branch loan outstanding and borrowers are between
TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and 1,283 to 3,450 distinctly. Furthermore, in the lower part
of Jamuna (upper and lower part of Sirajganj district), the services of GB seem to be very
operational and effective as well. Among the 10 branches of GB in the upper and lower
part of Sirajganj district, all branches have better strength in terms of their borrower
(3,451 to 5,509) number and total loan outstanding (more than Tk 10 million).
Figure 4d shows that the RDRSs capacity also in terms of its loan outstanding and the
total number of borrowers in the study sites. The loan outstanding of RDRS is
categorized into three major classes such as (1) less than TK 5 million / MFI, (2)
between TK 5 and 10 million / MFI and the last one is (3) more than Tk 10 million /
MFI. Besides that, the total number of borrowers is also categorized into three major
classes like (490 to 1,185), (1,186 to 2,006) and last is (2,007 to 2,850). There are 22
branches of RDRS are working along the river Jamuna. It covers 12.18% savers and
11.51% borrowers respectively, among the 30 NGOs in the study sites. In the lower
portion of Kurigram district, the number of borrowers is higher ranging in between 2,007
to 2,850 per MFI. In several branches of RDRS in Kurigram district, the loan outstanding
is not very high in comparison to other NGOs as it has been mentioned earlier. The loan
outstanding in several branches is lower (less than TK 5 million / MFI) than the number
of borrowers (2,007 to 2,850). In terms of outstanding, there is only one branch that was
located in the southern part of Kurigram where loan outstanding is higher (more than Tk
10 million / MFI), but the borrower's number is medium (1,186 to 2,006). It indicates
that once a huge amount of loan taken by the borrower for bigger investment is a sign of
great progress for the economic development of individuals. But at the same time, it is
also considered a higher risk for both the NGO and the borrower, if there have a chance
to fails to return the loan.
Apart from the four major NGOs, there are 26 NGOs along with 56 branches were
located who are working for the economic improvement of the poor by providing credit
services to the poor in the study sites. They cover 19.86% savers and 17.10% borrowers
in the study sites respectively. It indicates that the major four NGOs (Grameen Bank,
ASA, BRAC and RDRS Bangladesh) are covering 80.14% of the savers and 82.90% of
the borrowers in the study sites. In Kurigram, there are five NGOs that have a borrower
in between 859 to 2,258, whereas the concentration of NGOs is lower, apart from major
four NGOs. It has been also noticed that very limited number of branches are working in
the middle stream of the Jamuna. In the lower part of Sirajganj district, there are very
few numbers of NGOs are working with the lower number of borrowers and loan
outstanding.
geographical location is also another reason for saving money and to improve their social
status among the rural community. The correlation coefficient is for borrowers (r)equals
to 0.534 (r = 0.534, p < 0.001) indicating a cabalistic relationship between borrowers and
increase of income. Along the Jamuna, savers are mainly borrowers. As a result of
joining the credit program of NGOs, they borrowed money for the business purpose
where geographical location of the commercial/ growth centers are contributing a lot to
encourage local people to borrow money from the local NGOs. On the contrary, the
correlation coefficient is for saving deposits and total loan outstanding(r) equals to 0.119
and 0.182 accordingly. This results indicate that the relationship between saving deposits
and total loan outstanding with remoter annual income is slightly significant. Finally, the
overall result reveals that geographical location, demographic characteristics of the local
people, spatial distribution of local NGOs and establishment of commercial/ growth
centers are playing acabalistic role to make a better lifestyle of the remoter.
Figure 5: Geographical and anthropogenic factors for the distribution of local NGOs and their
strength and weakness in terms of savers, borrowers, saving deposits and total loan
outstanding’salong the river bank of Jamuna, Bangladesh.
Sources: Made by the authors, 2020; data collected from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Char
Livelihood Program (CLP), census report 2011 and field survey, 2020
192 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
5. Conclusion
The discussions lead us to a conclusion that amount of NGOs is not sufficient to serve a
large number of populations in the study sites. In the study sites, it takes proper
management along with equal distribution of local NGOs according to the population
density. Besides that, a total number of borrowers and loan outstanding illustrate the
strength and weakness of the NGOs capacity. Apart from major four NGOs, rest of 26
NGOs of 56 branches need to increase their capacity by involving more savers and
borrowers in the study sites. A number of growth centers are also a backdrop for the
development of the rural economy in the study sites. NGOs are providing more loans to
borrowers habituated close to the near growth centers. But the people habituated far
away from the growth centers are missing from the services of NGOs. If these
organizations establish new growth/commercial centers by providing loans to the poor
people in the remote areas, then the integrated development will have resulted.
References
Adam, A. M., 2010: Financial Openness Induced Growth and Poverty Reduction. The
International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 5: 75-86. Available at:
DOI: 10.3923/ijaef.2011.75.86
Ahmed, S., 2004: Microcredit and Poverty: New Realities and Strategic Issues. In S. Ahmed and
M. A. Hakim (Eds.), Attacking Poverty with Microcredit (2nd ed.) (pp. 23). Dhala-1000,
Bangladesh: The University Press Limited. Available at: http://www.ijset.net/
journal/1706.pdf
Ahsan, A. H. M. K. 2005. Role of NGOs Health, Family Planning and Education Program in
Poverty Reduction in Bangladesh: A Study on BRAC. Pakistan Journalof Social Science,
3(8), 1075-1081. Available at: https://www.medwelljournals.com/abstract/?
doi=pjssci.2005.1075.1081
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2007. Effect of Microfinance Operations on Poor Rural
Households and the Status of Women. Special Evaluation Study. Reference Number: SST:
REG 2007-19. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/15/39503711.pdf
Bansal, D. 2011. Impact of Microfinance on Poverty, Employment and Women Empowerment in
Rural Punjab. (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Economics, Punjabi University,
Patiala, India. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/3031
Bauer, A., Hasan, R., Magsombol, R. and Wan, G. 2008. The World Bank New Poverty Data:
Implications for the Asian Development Bank. SustainableDevelopment Working Paper
Series No. 2. Asian Development Bank. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/
Presntations/New-Poverty-Estimates/Poverty-Data-Implications.pdf
BBS, 2011: Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics
Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh,
Dhaka. Available at: http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/
Image/SubjectMatterDataIndex/YB-2012.pdf
Bedson, J. 2009. Microfinance in Asia-Trends, Challenges and Opportunities (1st ed.).
Queensland, Australia. The Foundation for Development Cooperation. Available at:
http://arcfinance.org/pdfs/pubs/MF_Trends_Challenges_Opportunities.pdf
SWOT Analysis for Local NGOs: A geo-spatial Analysis Evidence from Rural Bangladesh 193
BRAC (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee), 1990a: Half yearly report, June 1990,
Dhaka Bangladesh.
Chowdhury, A. F. and Rose, P. 2004. Non-state Provision of Basic Services. Education in
Bangladesh. Mimeo, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Develtere, P., and Huybrechts, A. 2002. Evidence on the Social and Economic Impact of
Grameen Bank and BRAC on the Poor in Bangladesh. Higher Institute ofLabour Studies.
Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Available at: http://www.hiva.be/docs/
paper/p2.pdf
Ghalib, A. K., Malki, I. and Imai, K. S. 2011. The Impact of Microfinance and Its Role in Easing
of Poverty of Rural Households: Estimations from Pakistan. Discussion Paper Series.
Kobe University, Japan. Available at: http://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/
English/DP2011-28.pdf
Glazer, S. 2010. Evaluating Microfinance: Do Small Loans for Poor Entrepreneurs End Poverty?
Global Researcher, 4(4), 81-101. Available at: http://www.interesjournals.org/full-
articles/impact-of-micro-credit-on-thelivelihood-of-borrowers-evidence-from-mekelle-
city-ethiopia.pdf?view=inline
Haider, S. K. U. 2013. The Impacts of NGOs on the Socio-Economic Situation of the Poor: A
Case Study in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. International Journal of Community
Development, 1(1), 35–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11634/233028791301360
Hashemi, S. M., and S. R. Schuler, 1993: Declining and Studying Empowerment: A research
note from Bangladesh, JSI Working Paper No. 3 (Arlington, VA: John Snow Research
and Training Institute, 1993).
Hashemi, S. M., and S. R. Schuler, et al. 1996, Rural Credit Programs and Women's
Empowerment in Bangladesh, World Development 24(4): 635-653. Available at:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/13314_hashemi_etal.pdf
Hasnain, S. S. 2013. The NGOs Knowledge and Socio-economic Development: An Empirical
Investigation in Bangladesh, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. Vol.3,
No.4, 2013 ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online). Available at:
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IKM/article/view/5169
Hossain, M. 2008. Community Development and Livelihood Security: BRAC’s Experience in
Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The Paper Presented to The Tokyo Peace builders’
Symposium 2008, UN House, Tokyo, March 24-25. Available at:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/pko/symposium0803/hossain.pdf.Google
Hossain, M. K. 2012. Measuring the Impact of BRAC Microfinance Operations: A Case Study of
a Village. The Journal of International Business Research. Vol. 5, No. 4; April 2012.
Available at: doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n4p112 and URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n4p112
Kamal, M. 1997. Poverty Measurement Methodology and Poverty Propensity in Bangladesh.
Daridro Parimap Padhati O Bangladeshe Daridror Probonota, BIDS, Dhaka, 1997,
Page-85 to 86.
Khanam, F. 2007. Women Participation in Rural Advancement in Bangladesh: Nature of Poverty
Alleviation and Women Empowerment. M.Sc. Ag. Econ. Thesis, Department of
Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
Mahmud, W. 1996. Employment Patterns and Income Formation in Rural Bangladesh: The Role
of Rural Non-farm Sector. The Bangladesh DevelopmentStudies. Volume, 24: 1-28,
Bangladesh.
194 The Jahangirnagar Review: Part II: Social Sciences, Vol. XLIII, 2019
Microcredit Summit Campaign. 2003. State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2003,
Washington D.C.
Milli, S.N. 1995. Achievement of BRAC on Gender Issues in Agriculture’ Proceedings of a
National Workshop, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka.
Mollah, T.H., Shishir, S., Ullah, W. et al. Assessing NGOs micro-credit programs: a geo-spatial
and socio-economic scenario from rural Bangladesh. Int Rev Econ 66, 79–99 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-018-0315-x
Murdoch, J. and Haley, B. 2002. Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction.
NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014. Available at: www.nyu.edu/wagner/publichtml/
cgibin/workingPapers/wp1014.pdf
Panjaitan-Drioadisuryo, R. D. M. and Cloud, K. 1999. Gender, Self-employment and Microcredit
Programs: An Indonesian Case Study. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,
39(5), 769-779. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)00028-9
Rahman, H.M. and Ahmed, F. 2001. Impact of NGOs on the Socioeconomic Development of
Target population in Some Selected Areas of Bangladesh. Research Report, Bangladesh
Agricultural Research Council.
Rahman, M.M., Mostafa, K. and Abdullah, A.M. 2002. Micro-credit: A Sharp Weapon for
Economic Empowerment of Rural Women. Pp.99-105.
Reddy, G. N. 2000. Empowering Women through Microcredit and Income-Generating
Activities. Towards Empowering Women- Microcredit and Social Mobilization. Available
at: http://www.acrn.eu/resources/Journals/201302c.pdf
Rogaly, B. 1996. Micro-Finance Evangelism, Destitute Women and the Hard Selling of a New
Anti-Poverty Formula. Development in Practice. Volume, 6 (2): pp. 100–112.
Roodman, D. and Morduch, J. 2009. The Impact of Micro-Credit on the Poor in Bangladesh:
Revisiting the Evidence. (Working Paper No. 174). Washington DC: Centre for Global
Development.
Siddiqi, N. 1985. Employment of Women and Appropriate Technology with Special Referable to
Bangladesh, ADAB News. Pp.10-15.
Siddiqui, B. N., Asif, F., Iqbal, S., Hassan, M. Z. Y., Malik, N. A. and Najwa, M. S. 2002.
Impact of Loan Facilities Provided by PRSP for Poverty Alleviation in Farming
Communities of Faisalabad. Journal of Applied Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004.
Swope, T. 2005. Microfinance and Poverty Alleviation. (Dissertation Paper). \]
Available at: www.rollins.edu/olin/rurj/mpa.pdf
Yunus, M. 2004. Expanding Microcredit Outreach to Reach the Millennium Development Goals:
Some Issues for Attention. In S. Ahmed & M. A. Hakim (Eds.), Attacking Poverty with
Microcredit (2nd ed.) (pp. 7-22). Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh: The University Press Limited.
Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1146/4763791439366492dd458
dcd6b975edb0544.pdf