Process of Site Selection
Process of Site Selection
Process of Site Selection
ARPL PRESENTATION
5:00-8:00 PM (FRIDAY)
PARAMETERS OF SITE
SELECTION AND
ANALYSIS
THE PROCESS OF
SITE SELECTION:
The site selection process - indicates
the practice of new facility location,
both for business and government.
Site selection involves measuring the
needs of a new project against the
merits of potential locations.
BORJA,ELISHA
PREPARED BY:
CALIBA,CHESKA KATE
Step 1: Confirm
Readiness Recommended Activities
The purpose of the readiness review
is to assess when to begin the formal - Review Feasibility Study and other
and informal site selection activities, to documents such as Project
determine whether there are any requirements; Site cost assumptions;
significant changes in the assumptions Relocation cost assumptions; Project
of the Feasibility Study and Site and approvals and funding; and Project
Design Prospectus, and to identify any schedule.
emerging issues and information that
can impact site selection. - Confirm status of project approvals
and funding
Duration: 2 Weeks
Step 2: Develop
Work Plan
Composing a Site Selection Work Plan:
- To provide guidance to ensure that site selection is performed accurately
and completely;
- To ensure that the appropriate experts and professionals participate at
the right time;
- To complete the site selection tasks in an efficient manner - to keep
stakeholders informed and aid in reaching consensus for the
recommended sites/s.
Duration: 2 Weeks
Recommended Activities:
- Selection of Site Investigation Team
- Compile Offers
Compile information from submitted offers and all other sources to establish the long list of potential sites.
Step 4: Long List Evaluation
Evaluate
Long List
In this step, the Site Investigation Team—using their
knowledge of the project and its requirements,
technical factors, and financial factors—reviews
and evaluates the long list.
Communicate
Select Short Short List to
Typically, the three (3) most suitable sites that List of Sites Stakeholders
satisfy the evaluation criteria compose the short
list for further analysis.
- Notify Offerors
Offerors are notified if their sites have been accepted for the short list and further study. Offerors
whose sites did not meet the minimal (“Go/No Go”) criteria also are notified, and their offers are
returned.
Criteria Categories for Evaluation of the Long-Listed Sites
Step 5: Evaluation of Short List
Conduct detailed
Evaluate Short List/Recommend Site(s) describes site evaluation
the detailed evaluation process to develop the
recommendation for site selection. The purpose of
this step is to evaluate the short-listed sites and to
recommend a final site selection. This step of the Communicate/ Prepare final Site
site selection process historically has been the review Investigation
most difficult. The inherent pressures and conflicts recommendations Report
all come into focus with the completion of the final
detailed analysis and evaluation. The team may
avoid many of these complications by following a Selection of
structured and thorough process. Recommend
final site(s) preferred
site(s)
Duration: 25 Weeks
- Conduct Detailed Site Evaluation
This is the final evaluation of the short-listed sites. This activity focuses on completion of the
required environmental reports and other studies necessary to finish the final Site Investigation
Report.
- Communicate/Review Recommendations
The Team Leader communicates the status of the proposed preferred site(s) to customer agency
representatives and other stakeholders to solicit their final input about the preferred site(s).
https://qdoc.tips/parameters-of-site-selection-rexeldocx-pdf-free.html?
fbclid=IwAR0EVS04MD81GlKNwSC_mNtRY65N1055eoJRif-Bi10s0hkMO8fEV6dSr7Q
https://www.gsa.gov/cdnstatic/GSA_Site_Selection_Guide_R2-sY2-i_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdf